smart growth strategy / regional livability footprint project marin co-sponsors county of marin...
TRANSCRIPT
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Marin Co-SponsorsCounty of Marin
County of Marin Congestion Management AgencyGolden Gate Transit
Gray Panthers of Marin CountyInterfaith Coalition for Green Planning
Leadership InstituteLeague of Women Voters of Marin County
Marin County Bicycle CoalitionMarin County Board of SupervisorsNorth Bay Labor Council of AFL-CIO
Sustainable MarinTRANSDEF
Special thanks to the Marin Community Foundation for financial support
of today's workshop.
Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy
Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development
Regional Livability Footprint Project
Marin CountyApril 13, 2002
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• 1 million new jobs
• 1 million more people
• 265,000 daily in-commuters to the region
• 150% increase in aggregate traffic congestion
• Conversion of up to 83,000 acres of open space
• 44% decrease in households able to afford the median priced home from 1995 to 2001
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
BAY AREA TRENDSBAY AREA TRENDS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Through 2020
1995 to 2001
Natural Increase
(“Our own children”)
Net Migration(“Other People”)
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
REGIONAL POPULATION GROWTHREGIONAL POPULATION GROWTH
50%
50%(approximate figures)
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Expand housing?
• Constrain future job growth?
• Expand infrastructure to handle in-commuters?
Find a smarter way to grow
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
CHOICES ABOUT FUTURE GROWTHCHOICES ABOUT FUTURE GROWTH
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Regionwide smart growth land use vision supported by local governments.
• Regulatory changes and fiscal incentives needed to implement vision.
• A set of smart growth land use projections.
PROJECT GOALSPROJECT GOALS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
The Three E’s of Smart Growth and Sustainable Development:
SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLESSMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Prosperous Economy
Quality Environment
Social Equity
• Preserve open space and agricultural land.
• Provide sufficient affordable housing.
• Revitalize central cities and older suburbs.
• Reduce single occupant vehicle trips.
• Foster equitable economic development while minimizing displacement.
• Efficiently accommodate projected growth.
SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLESSMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PROCESSPROCESS
Public Workshop Round OneSeptember and October 2001
Distillationand Analysis
Public Workshop Round TwoApril and May 2002
Final Steps
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Participants included:
- elected officials
- planning staff
- developers
- environmental advocates
- social equity representatives
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONEPUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONE
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Nine public workshopsSeptember and October 2001
Total: 105 countywide smart growth scenarios
• Smart growth principles
• Land use mappingexercise
• Affordable housing
• Regulatory changes and incentives
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONEPUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONE
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLANNING AREASPLANNING AREAS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPES MENUPLACE TYPES MENU
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PLACE TYPES MANUALPLACE TYPES MANUAL
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONEPUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONE
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
POST-WORKSHOP PROCESSPOST-WORKSHOP PROCESS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Distillation MapsDistillation Maps
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
POST-WORKSHOP PROCESSPOST-WORKSHOP PROCESS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Identified three draft regionwide themes and how they would play out in each county.
• Conducted distillation meeting with over 100 local planners and stakeholders.
• Finalized themes and regionwide maps of each alternative.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
DISTILLATION METHODOLOGYDISTILLATION METHODOLOGY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Identify themes that emerged from all nine Round One workshops.
• All components appeared in at least one group’s scenario.
• Alternatives as distinct from each other as possible.
• Similar regional jobs and housing levels in each alternative.
• Allow jobs and housing totals to vary by county according to theme and workshop products.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
DISTILLATION PROCESSDISTILLATION PROCESS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Environment
• Transportation
• Housing
• Social Equity
• Development Feasibility
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ANALYSISANALYSIS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Analysis of Alternatives andCurrent Trends Base Case
TODAY’S WORKSHOPTODAY’S WORKSHOP
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Review results of first round of workshops.
• Review base case, three alternatives and analysis.
• Discuss regional planning principles.
• Discuss needed regulatory changes and incentives.
• Recommend preferred alternative.
Select and refine
a single preferred alternative
for Marin County.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
TODAY’S GOALTODAY’S GOAL
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Spring 2002 Round Two Workshops
Summer 2002 Begin to obtain regulatory changes and incentives
Develop Alternative Projections
November 2002 ABAG Board considers adoption of alternative Projections forecast
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
REMAINING STEPSREMAINING STEPS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• BAASD coordinates a Public Education
and Engagement Campaign.
• ABAG Board considers adoption of
alternative Projections forecast.
• MTC’s Regional Transportation Plan.
• Other regional plans.
• Regulatory changes and incentives.
• Local implementation.
FINAL STEPSFINAL STEPS
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
The Alternatives
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
CURRENT TRENDSCURRENT TRENDS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
EXISTING CONDITIONS: HOUSING UNITS BY COUNTY
Alameda
NapaSan Mateo
Santa Clara
Sonoma
In-commuters
Solano
San Francisco
Contra Costa
Marin
Existing Conditions (2000)
County Households Jobs
Alameda 514,600 725,800
Contra Costa 338,900 360,100
Marin 99,500 123,500
Napa 46,200 59,700
San Francisco 315,600 628,900
San Mateo 254,400 380,400
Santa Clara 567,100 1,077,200
Solano 130,300 129,500
Sonoma 171,500 203,500
Total 2,438,100 3,688,600
CURRENT HOUSEHOLDS AND JOBS
165,000 In-Commuters
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
CURRENT TRENDSCURRENT TRENDS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Base Case
• Relatively dispersed throughout the region. • Northern counties will grow the fastest.
• Southern counties will exhibit the most numeric growth.
• Development at the edges and within core cities.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
CURRENT TRENDSCURRENT TRENDS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Base Case
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
CURRENT TRENDSCURRENT TRENDS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
BASE CASE: HOUSING UNITS BY COUNTY
Alameda
Napa
San Mateo
Santa ClaraSonoma
In-commuters
Solano
San Francisco
Contra Costa
Marin
Change in Change inCounty Housing Jobs
Alameda 64,200 238,800
Contra Costa 81,900 140,500
Marin 11,900 27,000
Napa 12,500 30,100
San Francisco 15,900 102,800
San Mateo 24,100 71,400
Santa Clara 97,800 231,000
Solano 48,900 81,300
Sonoma 44,300 95,600
Total 401,500 1,018,500
GROWTH IN BASE CASE (2000-2020)
1. Central Cities
2. Network of Neighborhoods
3. Smarter Suburbs
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
THE ALTERNATIVESTHE ALTERNATIVES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Most development focused in centers of the region.
• Locates compact, walkable, mixed-income, mixed use development in each county’s largest city or cities.
• Also locates growth in nodes around existing public transit stations.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 1ALTERNATIVE 1
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Central Cities
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 1ALTERNATIVE 1
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Central Cities
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 1ALTERNATIVE 1
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Central CitiesMarin County
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 1 ALTERNATIVE 1
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
ALTERNATIVE #1: HOUSING UNITS BY COUNTY
Alameda
Marin
NapaSan Francisco
San Mateo
Sonoma
Solano
ContraCosta
SantaClara
Change in Change inCounty Housing Jobs
Alameda 140,500 247,400
Contra Costa 121,400 167,100
Marin 11,100 8,300
Napa 10,000 12,600
San Francisco 110,900 150,900
San Mateo 39,400 54,200
Santa Clara 152,700 253,300
Solano 47,700 44,500
Sonoma 34,400 51,100
Total 668,100 989,400
GROWTH IN ALTERNATIVE #1 (2000-2020)
• Locates development in same locations as Alternative 1, but less dense.
• Adds development in additional areas:
– existing transit nodes and major corridors.
– walkable communities.
– existing communities along an expanded transit network.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 2ALTERNATIVE 2
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Network of Neighborhoods
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 2ALTERNATIVE 2
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Network of Neighborhoo
ds
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 2ALTERNATIVE 2
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Network of Neighborho
odsMarin County
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 2ALTERNATIVE 2
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
ALTERNATIVE #2: HOUSING UNITS BY COUNTY
Alameda
Marin
Napa
San Francisco
San Mateo
Sonoma
Solano
SantaClara
ContraCosta
Change in Change inCounty Housing Jobs
Alameda 141,500 242,300
Contra Costa 106,200 130,100
Marin 16,400 29,100
Napa 19,100 27,100
San Francisco 79,800 97,300
San Mateo 37,200 77,300
Santa Clara 164,500 222,900
Solano 54,500 77,600
Sonoma 53,600 82,800
Total 672,800 986,500
GROWTH IN ALTERNATIVE #2 (2000-2020)
• Locates development in same areas as Alternatives 1 and 2, but still less dense.
• New edge development creates communities that are more balanced.
• Additional new smart growth communities.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 3ALTERNATIVE 3
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Smarter Suburbs
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 3ALTERNATIVE 3
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Smarter Suburbs
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 3ALTERNATIVE 3
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Smarter SuburbsMarin County
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
ALTERNATIVE 3ALTERNATIVE 3
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Change in Change inCounty Housing Jobs
Alameda 117,500 219,300
Contra Costa 87,700 140,500
Marin 23,700 31,500
Napa 19,600 34,900
San Francisco 66,100 61,600
San Mateo 32,500 45,700
Santa Clara 199,100 213,500
Solano 67,600 141,700
Sonoma 62,900 93,800
Total 676,700 982,500
GROWTH IN ALTERNATIVE #3 (2000-2020)
ALTERNATIVE #3:2020 HOUSING UNITS BY COUNTY
Alameda
Napa
San FranciscoSan Mateo
Sonoma
Marin
Solano
ContraCosta
SantaClara
The Analysis
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
The Analysis
Environment
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Goals: • Preserve the region’s undeveloped land
• Improve the region’s air quality•Conserve water
ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Greenfield Development in
the Region:
Acres of greenfield converted
ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Greenfield Development
Acres of greenfield convertedAlternative 1 Alternative 2
Alternative 3 Base Case
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT
• Alternatives accommodate much more housing than current trends
• Air emissions remain mostly unchanged relative to Base Case
• More concentrated alternatives perform marginally better
Reduction in Air Emissions forecast over
the next 20 years
Air Quality
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT
Water Consumption in the Region
Average Daily Per Household Water Usage
050
100150200250300350
Current Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3
•In Marin County: decreases by an average of 17% over current usage under the three alternatives
•Region wide: decreases by an average of 12% under the three alternatives region
27% 17% 7%
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT
Water Consumption in Marin County
Average Daily Per Household Water Usage
050
100150200250300350
Current Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3
•In Marin County: decreases by an average of 17% over current usage under the three alternatives
•Region wide: decreases by an average of 12% under the three alternatives region
18% 11% 9%
Transportation
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Goal: Reduce reliance on the single-occupant vehicle.
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION
• Proximity to Transit
• Mode Split
• Auto Ownership
• Commute Time
• Commute Length
• Vehicle Miles Traveled
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION
Located within ⅓ mile of a rail station or ¼ mile of a bus stop served by frequent bus service.
Proximity to Existing Transit in the Region
Current
Conditions
New Development
Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3
Housing near transit
23% 60% 47% 28%
Jobs near transit
36% 68% 59% 31%
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION
Current
Conditions
New Development
Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3
Housing near transit
3% 61% 21% 7%
Jobs near transit
13% 12% 7% 9%
Proximity to Existing Transitin Marin County
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION
The proportion of all trips by walking, bicycle, public transit vs. single occupant vehicle.
Base Case
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Auto (drive alone)
82% 78% 81% 82%
Transit, Walking, Bicycle
18% 22% 19% 18%
Mode Split
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION
Percentage of Zero Vehicle Households:
• Base Case 2020: 8%
• Alternative 1: 11%
• Alternative 2: 10%
• Alternative 3: 9%
Auto Ownership
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION
Commute Time & Length
• Current length: 12 miles
• Current time: 27 minutes
• Both remain essentially unchanged in all three alternatives and the Base Case
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION
Vehicles Miles Traveled in the Region
VMT in millions of miles per day
175 167 172 176
0
50
100
150
200
Base Case Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Housing
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Goal:
Plan for a full range of housing to meet the needs of all current and future Bay Area residents.
HOUSING AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AFFORDABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Mix of units by housing affordability categories:
• Very Low-Income Households (less than 50% AMI)
• Low-Income Households (50 to 80% AMI)
• Moderate-Income Households (80 to 120% AMI)
• Above Moderate-Income Households (120% AMI or more)
(AMI: Area Median Income)
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
HOUSING AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AFFORDABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Past Affordable Housing Production(1988 to 1998)
• 250,000 housing units constructed
• Needed affordable units: 58%
• Actual affordable units: 40%
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
HOUSING AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AFFORDABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
CUMULATIVE HOUSING PRODUCTION 1988-1998
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
Num
ber
of U
nits
Total Units Produced Affordable Units Needed Affordable Units Produced
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
JOBS/HOUSING MATCHJOBS/HOUSING MATCH
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSING, 2000-2020:CURRENT TRENDS VS. ALTERNATE VISION
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
2005 2010 2015 2020
Current Trend Alternatives
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
HOUSING AFFORDABILITYHOUSING AFFORDABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Base Case Alternatives 1,2,3
Per
cent
of Tota
l Housing
Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate
Housing Units Envisioned by
Affordability 2000-2020
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
JOBS/HOUSING RELATIONSHIPJOBS/HOUSING RELATIONSHIP
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Jobs/Housing Match Analysis Areas
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
JOBS/HOUSING RELATIONSHIPJOBS/HOUSING RELATIONSHIP
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Marin County Analysis
Areas
Marin County
Greater San Francisco
4. Marin County
10. Greater San Francisco
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
JOBS/HOUSING RELATIONSHIPJOBS/HOUSING RELATIONSHIP
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
DefinitionsTotal Balance:
Sufficient housing within an analysis area for all
workers working in that area.
New Match: Sufficient, new affordable
housing within an analysis area for all new workers working in that area.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
EXISTING JOBS/HOUSING BALANCEEXISTING JOBS/HOUSING BALANCE
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
60% of the region's
households are located in balanced
analysis areas
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
TOTAL JOBS/HOUSING BALANCETOTAL JOBS/HOUSING BALANCE
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Percent of Total Households in Analysis Areas with a Balance
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Base Case Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
TOTAL JOBS/HOUSING BALANCETOTAL JOBS/HOUSING BALANCE
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
NEW JOBS/HOUSING MATCHNEW JOBS/HOUSING MATCH
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Percent of New Households in Analysis Areas with a Match
0%20%40%60%80%
Base Case Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
NEW JOBS/HOUSING MATCHNEW JOBS/HOUSING MATCH
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Social Equity
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Goals• Implement development patterns that benefit all communities in the region.
• Avoid displacement of existing Bay Area residents and businesses.
SOCIAL EQUITYSOCIAL EQUITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Impoverished Community
The majority of households earn
less than 80% of the County
median income (1990).
SOCIAL EQUITYSOCIAL EQUITY
The Bay Area’s 46 Most Impoverished Neighborhoods
(NCCC 1997)
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
A Range of Communities
Inner-city, poor job/transit access: Bayview Hunters Point
Inner-city, good job/transit access: Central East Oakland
Suburban, good job access: East San Jose
Suburban, poor job access: North Richmond
Rural Community: Boyes Hot Springs
SOCIAL EQUITYSOCIAL EQUITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Growth in the Five Case Study Communities
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Base Case Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Housing Jobs
SOCIAL EQUITYSOCIAL EQUITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Base Case
ALT 1 ALT 2 ALT 3
Improve Jobs/Housing Match Increase Job Supply Provide Increased Retail Services Relieve Overcrowding Improve Transit Access Minimize Displacement
Outcomes of the Alternatives
SOCIAL EQUITYSOCIAL EQUITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Equitable Smart Growth Strategies
• Provide training to current residents to obtain new high-skill jobs locally.
• Match job development to skills of current residents.
• Improve transit access to jobs around the region.
• Provide additional retail facilities.
• Cultivate business opportunities for local residents.
• Alleviate overcrowding.
• Maintain affordability of existing housing.
Development Feasibility
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Goal:
Plan for a smart growth future that can be realized.
DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITYDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• Marketability
• Physical “Fit”
• Financial Feasibility
•Fiscal Impacts
MARKETABILITYMARKETABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
In 2000, 62% of the Bay Area’s total housing stock was single-family units.
New Units 2000-2020 in the Region
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Base Case Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Single Family Multi-Family
MARKETABILITYMARKETABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
In 2000, 69% of Marin County’s total housing stock was single-family units.
New Units 2000-2020 in Marin County
0%20%40%60%80%
100%120%
Year 2000 Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
single family multi-family
MARKETABILITYMARKETABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
BAY AREA POPULATION CHANGEBY AGE 2000-2020
-400,000
-200,000
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
1
Cha
nge
in P
opul
atio
n
0-19
20-24
25-34
35-44
45-49
50-64
65-74
75-79
80+
MARKETABILITYMARKETABILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Shifting demographic patterns create demand for a variety of housing types:
• compact housing near workplaces
• small single-family attached units
• “granny flats” (second units)
• senior housing
PHYSICAL FITPHYSICAL FIT
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Acres of Redevelopment
• Alternative 1: 33,000 acres
• Alternative 2: 41,000 acres
• Alternative 3: 45,000 acres
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITYFINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
• location• timing• economic and local market conditions• land prices• construction costs• regulatory environment• financial requirements of the development
and investment communities• political conditions
Financial feasibility will depend on:
FISCAL IMPACTSFISCAL IMPACTS
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Negative • Potential fiscal drains on local resources • Higher capital costs in urbanized areas with
aging infrastructure
Positive • Save 2% to 6% annually on operating costs • Save up to 40% on capital costs,
particularly in greenfield areas
Incentives and Regulatory Changes
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
INCENTIVES & REGULATORY CHANGES INCENTIVES & REGULATORY CHANGES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Fiscal Reform
• Return property tax to local governments. • Share tax revenue.
• Split property tax rate for land and improvements.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
INCENTIVES & REGULATORY CHANGES INCENTIVES & REGULATORY CHANGES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Financial Incentives
• Reward school districts that create joint school-community facilities. • Link new and existing state housing funding to development of affordable housing.
• Create smart growth zones.
• Target transportation funding to rail and bus nodes.
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATIONKEY ECONOMIC ISSUESKEY ECONOMIC ISSUES
INCENTIVES & REGULATORY CHANGES INCENTIVES & REGULATORY CHANGES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Regulatory Changes
• Create limited exemptions to CEQA for Smart Growth development projects.
• Pass construction defect liability legislation.
• Create and enforce a living wage standard.
Smart Growth Principles
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Economy• Provide adequate housing for the region’s workforce.
• Achieve and maintain jobs/housing balance.
• Focus new development in downtowns to revive business districts.
• Create economic prosperity across the region.
• Provide access to support economic development.
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Environment
• Protect agricultural and undeveloped lands.
• Preserve sensitive habitats to maintain carrying capacity for non-human life.
• Preserve air and water resources.
• Balance open space and development in urbanized areas.
• Provide greater access to open space, parks and greenbelts in urban areas.
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Transportation
• Improve transit, pedestrian and bike
facilities.
• Prioritize mass transit over auto-oriented transportation.
• Increase residential density near transit nodes.
• Extend public transit only to areas with existing or planned adequate densities.
• Encourage development along transit lines.
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Housing
• Provide housing affordable to the Bay
Area population.
• Provide housing appropriate to
workforce and incomes.
• Create jobs near housing.
• Provide housing stability for existing
residents.
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Social Equity
• Provide housing affordable to the full
range of income categories.
• Improve quality of life for existing
residents.
• Create mixed-income communities.
• Prevent and mitigate displacement of
residents and businesses.
• Match new jobs to skills of existing
residents.
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Development Patterns• Design new developments that incorporate principles of density, diversity, access and pedestrian-scale.
• Focus development in existing developed areas.
• Promote mixed-use development to foster walkable communities.
• Implement urban infill as a smart growth strategy.
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECTSMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT
Regional Growth
• Concentrate growth in existing urbanized areas.
• Preserve greenfield sites.
• Balance jobs and housing in all areas.