skip hudspeth and gordon hayhoe 112/20/2015. pavement roughness subjective pilot rating study phase...
TRANSCRIPT
Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe
104/21/23
Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study
Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B737-800 flight simulator for input of real world airport surface elevation profiles.
Phase II - Develop runway and taxiway pavement roughness rating scales for determining pavement condition for maintenance. The rating scales will be based on pilot's subjective ratings in response to simulator cockpit motions.
04/21/23 2
Acknowledgements
Federal Aviation Administration
304/21/23
B737-800 Simulator OverviewSurface Roughness Model Enhancements
Challenges and ResolutionsRoughness Model TestingFuture Work
04/21/23 4
FAA B737-800 Flight Simulator
Located at the FAA’s Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City.
Level D Full Flight Simulator
Six-degree-of-freedom motion system.
High resolution visual display and sound system.
Does not provide real world surface roughness models
504/21/23
Flight Compartment
Host Computer
Motion Control Cabinet
Motion Platform
604/21/23
Visual Display
Visual Image Generator
Interfac
e
Flight Compartment
Host Computer
Motion Control Cabinet
Motion Platform
704/21/23
Visual Display
Visual Image Generator
Interfac
e
Flight Compartment
Host Computer
Motion Control Cabinet
Motion Platform
804/21/23
Visual Display
Visual Image Generator
Interfac
e
Flight Compartment
Host Computer
Motion Control Cabinet
Motion Platform
904/21/23
Visual Display
Visual Image Generator
Interfac
e
04/21/23 10
B737-800 Simulator Motion Platform
Simulator Motion SystemDue to limited travel, sustained accelerations
are not possible.Motion system designed to provides
acceleration onset cueing.Flight model accelerations are filtered to
optimize the available motion response for training maneuvers.
An accelerometer mounted below the pilot seats provides measurement of cockpit vertical accelerations.
1104/21/23
Motion System Inputs from the Flight Model
Receives rigid body accelerations from flight model
Other motion effects are simulated through the use of buffet and special effects generators within the motion system.
These include stall and flap buffets, touchdown bumps, etc.
1204/21/23
Flight Compartment
Host Computer
Motion Control Cabinet
Motion Platform
1304/21/23
Visual Display
Visual Image Generator
Interfac
e
Equations
of Motion
Thrust Weight Atmosphere
Ground Aerodynamics
Simulator Motion System
Simulator Visual System
Simulator Flight Model
1404/21/23
Existing B737-800 Simulator Surface Roughness Model
The simulator provides a generic roughness model using randomly generated vertical surface deviations.
The generic roughness amplitude is selectable with range from 0 to 5.
1504/21/23
Random vs Actual Surface Roughness
04/21/23 16
Generic (random) surface roughness
Regional heavy runway surface roughness
New Surface Roughness ModelReplaces the random roughness generation
with profiles measured on airport pavements.Allows selection of surface profiles from
simulator instructor station.Integrates with existing simulator models.Aligns airport surface profiles with visual
scenes.Provides realistic simulator cockpit motion.
1704/21/23
Surface Profiles Formatted for use on the Simulator
Surface elevation is uniform across width of the profile.
Elevation units changed from inches to feet.
Surface profile sample spacing of four feet.
Profiles were filtered to remove very low frequency variations in elevation.
04/21/23 18
Profile Filtering Example
04/21/23 19
Runway elevation profile before high-pass filtering
Runway elevation profile after high-pass filtering
04/21/23 20
Surface Profile
Strut Model
Gear Forces
04/21/23 21
Surface Profile
Strut Model
Flight Model
Linear /rotational accelerations at CG
04/21/23 22
Surface Profile
Strut Model
Flight Model
Motion System
Aircraft Flexible Modes
The simulator flight model assumes a rigid aircraft body.
However, aircraft body flexing provides a large component of the cockpit acceleration response to surface roughness.
04/21/23 23
04/21/23 24
Cockpit vertical accelerations with rigid body modes
Cockpit vertical accelerations with rigid body and four flexible body modes
Flexible Mode Simulation• Assumes lightly damped linearly flexible
continuous body.• Four flexible modes were modeled.• Implemented on the host computer.• Strut force used to excite the flexible modes.• Outputs vertical accelerations at the cockpit
position.• Cockpit vertical accelerations were
transformed into CG pitch accelerations for transfer to the motion system.
04/21/23 25
Surface Roughness Model EvaluationTests were developed to evaluate the
roughness model performance through the collection of time histories of aircraft and surface profile parameters such as:
Landing gear position along profileSurface height at each gear positionGround speedLanding gear vertical forceC0mputed cockpit vertical accelerationActual cockpit vertical acceleration
04/21/23 26
04/21/23 27Cockpit vertical acceleration - 130
knots
Cockpit vertical acceleration - 100 knots
Cockpit vertical acceleration - 50 knots
Effect of ground speed on cockpit accelerations
04/21/23 28
Cockpit Accelerations: Computed (top) and Measured (bottom)
Rigid Body Only One Flexible Mode
Subjective Pilot EvaluationTwo industry pilots were asked to evaluate the realism of
various runway roughness profiles.The pilots performed the following maneuvers:
Taxiing Takeoffs Landings
The pilot’s feedback indicated that the profile roughness models provided a realistic simulation of the real world runways except for the absence of background tire rumble and cockpit response to centerline lights and concrete joint bumps.
04/21/23 29
SummaryA B737-800 simulator surface r0ughness
model was successfully implemented allowing use of actual airport surface profiles and providing realistic cockpit motion response to the profile elevation changes.
The surface roughness model provided a distinct enhancement over the existing runway random roughness models through the use of selectable real world surface profiles.
04/21/23 30
Further Work
Phase II of this project is currently in progress with a preliminary test of subjective pilot rating tests planned for this summer.
04/21/23 31
04/21/23 32
Contact Information
Gordon F. HayhoeFAA Airport Technology R&D Branch, AJP-6312William J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405 [email protected]
Skip HudspethHudspeth & Associates, Inc.11130 Johnson Davis RoadHuntersville, NC [email protected]