simulations “sharpen” their tools · simulations “sharpen” their tools the community of...

4
Simulations “sharpen” their tools The community of physicists validates the precision of numerical methods April 6, 2016 For several years now, numerical simulations have been recognised as an important method of scientific investigation in the field of the physics of materials (amongst others). With simulations, reality is reproduced, by means of computer calculations, to a necessary degree of approximation (which may produce errors) that experts refer to as “precision”. An article in Science, authored by a large group of scientists from 44 international institutions, marks the beginning of a major process of validation of algorithms and methods which, though different, converge on the same “problems”. The first test was carried out on the equations of state of elemental crystals: the software and methods examined (including the most commonly used today) showed great consistency of predictions, confirming their precision. Among the authors of the article are a number of SISSA research fellows and professors.

Upload: dangdiep

Post on 11-May-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Simulations “sharpen” their tools · Simulations “sharpen” their tools The community of physicists validates the precision of numerical methods April 6, 2016 For several years

Simulations“sharpen”theirtools

ThecommunityofphysicistsvalidatestheprecisionofnumericalmethodsApril6,2016Forseveralyearsnow,numericalsimulationshavebeenrecognisedasanimportantmethodofscientificinvestigationinthefieldofthephysicsofmaterials(amongstothers).Withsimulations,realityisreproduced,bymeansofcomputercalculations,toanecessarydegreeofapproximation(whichmayproduceerrors)thatexpertsrefertoas“precision”.AnarticleinScience,authoredbyalargegroupofscientistsfrom44internationalinstitutions,marksthebeginningofamajorprocessofvalidationofalgorithmsandmethodswhich,thoughdifferent,convergeonthesame“problems”.Thefirsttestwascarriedoutontheequationsofstateofelementalcrystals:thesoftwareandmethodsexamined(includingthemostcommonlyusedtoday)showedgreatconsistencyofpredictions,confirmingtheirprecision.AmongtheauthorsofthearticleareanumberofSISSAresearchfellowsandprofessors.

Page 2: Simulations “sharpen” their tools · Simulations “sharpen” their tools The community of physicists validates the precision of numerical methods April 6, 2016 For several years

Inscience,thereistheory:afairlygeneral“statement”thatdescribestheworld.Forexample(simplifyingsomewhat)takethestatement“theEarthrotatesarounditsownaxisandaroundtheSun”.Totestthistheory,weneedtoproducepredictionsthatweareabletocomparebymeansofmeasurements(whenthesearepossible).Andtodothis,weneedmorespecificmodelstranslatedintoamathematicallanguage.However,theremaybeseveral,slightlydifferentmodelsorevenmodelsbasedonradicallydifferentmethodologiesthatpredictthesamething.Forexample,goingbacktoour“theory”presentedabove,weknowthatitimpliesthatdayandnightalternateontheEarth,sowecandecidetocalculatewhentheSunwillrisetomorrowandthencheckthecorrectnessofofthepredictioninreallife.Thiscanbedoneinseveralways.Byusingarecordofallthesunrisetimesoverthepastmonths,wecantrytoidentifyregularpatternsandproduceamathematicalfunctionthatdescribesthepastandprovidesanestimateofthefuture,includingthetimeatwhichthesunwillrisetomorrow–allwithoutknowinganythingabouttheEarthoritsrotationspeed,etc.Alternatively,wecanusemathematicalmethodstoreconstructthephysicalsystemoftheEarthrevolvingaroundtheSun(enteringdataontheplanet’sdiameter,rotationspeed,axisinclination,etc.),andcalculatetomorrow’ssunrisetimeusingthismethod.Theresultsofthetwomethodscanbecomparedwithreal-lifeobservationandwitheachother.Twotypesoferrorcanoccur:thetheoryiswrong,theEarthdoesnotrevolvearoundtheSunanditisonlybychancethatthepredictionscoincideordonotcoincidewithreality,butsoonerorlatersomemajorinconsistencywillemergeandthetheorywillhavetobereviewed(imaginethatourstartingtheoryhadbeen“theSunrevolvesaroundtheEarth”).Thisisaproblemof“accuracy”andconcernsourknowledgeofreality(andmuchbroaderprocessesofreview,debateandreasoningwithinthescientificcommunity).However,anothertypeofproblemmayarise:thetheoryiscorrect,butthemathematicaltoolsweareusingarewrong,foravarietyofreasons.Inthiscase,wetalkabout“precision”ameasurementthatcanbeobtained,forexample,bycomparingtheresultsofthedifferentmethods:iftheyareconsistent(inourcasetheyyieldthesamesunrisetime)thenwecanconsiderthemtobereliableandcontinuetousethem.This,thoughinafarmorecomplexmanner,iswhatwasdonebythescientists(includingStefanodeGironcoliandAndreaDalCorso,professorsatSISSA/CNR-IOMDemocritos,EmineKüçükbenliSISSAresearchscientist,andPaoloGiannozzi,professorattheUniversityofUdine)forthenumericalsimulationmethodsthatarewidelyusedinthephysicsofmaterials.Indeed,todayphysicistsstudythenatureofmatterbysimulatingitspropertieswithdifferentmethodsand

Page 3: Simulations “sharpen” their tools · Simulations “sharpen” their tools The community of physicists validates the precision of numerical methods April 6, 2016 For several years

software.“Duringanimportantconferenceheldafewyearsago,wecametotheconclusionthatitwastimetodosomethingwehadnotdonebefore–atleastnotsystematically–andwhichchemists,inafieldquiteclosetoours,hadalreadystartedtodo,thatis,totesttheprecisionofourinstruments”,explainsdeGironcoli.“Westartedwithsimplethings,butclearlywestillhavealongwaytogo.Nonethelesstheresultswerepositive”continuesdeGironcoli.Thegroupofscientistsstartedfromthebasisofphysics,theequationofstate,andtesteditonthesimplestmaterials:crystalsmadeupofoneelementonly(doingitforallelementsoftheperiodictable).Wetestednolessthan40methods,implementedwith15differentsoftwarepackages.AmongthemisalsoQuantumESPRESSO,oneofthemostimportantsoftwarepackagescurrentlyinuse,producedbyaconsortiuminwhichalsoSISSAandtheUniversityofUdineparticipate.“Weareverysatisfied:notonlydodifferentsoftwarepackagesimplementingthesamemethodsyieldthesameresults,butnowwealsogetthesameresultswiththemostcommonlyusedmainclassesofmethods(therearetwo)”commentsGiannozzi.Obviously,thisisonlythestart-thegroupisalreadyconsideringextendingthetesttomorecomplexmaterials–butitisstillanimportantconfirmation:“precisionishigh”,concludesdeGironcoli,“sowecanrelaxalittleandconcentrateonaccuracy,thatis,ontheoreticalspeculation”.Amongtheotherinstitutionstakingpartinthestudy,coordinatedbytheGhentUniversity(Belgium),areHarvardUniversity(USA),theUniversitiesofOxfordandCambridge(UK),theÉcolePolytechniqueFédéraledeLausanne(Switzerland),theMax-PlanckInstituteofMicrostructurePhysics(Germany),tonamejustafew.USEFULLINKS:

• OriginalpaperinScience:http://goo.gl/ZoJE2b

IMAGES:

• Bismuthcrystals-Credits:MaximBilovitskiy(Wikimediacommons:https://goo.gl/4fRRNa)

Contact:

Pressoffice:[email protected]:(+39)0403787644|(+39)366-3677586viaBonomea,26534136Trieste

Page 4: Simulations “sharpen” their tools · Simulations “sharpen” their tools The community of physicists validates the precision of numerical methods April 6, 2016 For several years

MoreinformationaboutSISSA:www.sissa.it