simulating the solar shadow
DESCRIPTION
Simulating the Solar Shadow. Allen I. Mincer NYU LANL 6/2/05. The General Problem. Integrate the equations: Numerical approach: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
-
Simulating the Solar Shadow Allen I. MincerNYULANL 6/2/05
-
The General ProblemIntegrate the equations:
Numerical approach:
Tried AIM version using kinematic equations and steps with midpoint acceleration, better than 4th order Runge Kutta, OK for Moon but not precise or fast enough for Sun.
-
Old Comparison
-
Stoermer Rule, as Modified by Henrici
-
Aim Modified Version:
-
Some More Calculation Details
-
New Method UsedOld method sent particles from Earth to Moon to find nominal shadow direction, then started at Moon and generated events to Milagro.But D(Earth-Sun) ~ 400 D(Earth-Moon) and A(Sun) ~ 105 A(Moon).Would need to generate ~105 times the events to get the same shadow statistics.Instead, using Liouvilles theorem, isotropic C.R.s + B fields give isotropic C.R.s at Earth, unless absorbed.Generate backwards going C.R.s from Milagro to Sun. Shadow if sun is hit.
-
Preliminary Run10 day run late March.Pick sun position every 100 seconds.For each position, pick energy on E-2.7 spectrum starting at 0.5 TeV.For each position generate 10K events centered on the vertices of a 100 x 100 grid 5 degrees around straight line to sun : 0.1 degree steps in , cos.Run 4 cases: B Earth only Sun dipole parallel to Earths dipole B Earth + Sun dipole parallel to Earths dipole B Earth + Sun dipole perp. to Earths dipole
-
B Earth
-
Solar dipole parallel Earths, No B Earth
-
Solar Dipole parallel Earths
-
Rotating Solar Dipole perp Earths
-
Comparisons
-
Conclusion/conjecture:As B field increases, major change is fewer shadowed particles, since localized B large enough to cause ~degree type shifts will prevent particles from being shadowed.
Build in realistic fields.Improve effective area,Detector resolution.Compare with Solar data shadow under different solar conditions.
To Do: