simon bleckly justin swale warrington bc / sefton mbc 11 october 2013
TRANSCRIPT
FINANCIAL SAFEGUARDING
Simon BlecklyJustin Swale
Warrington BC / Sefton MBC
11 October 2013
What are we going to tell you?
Background – why this area is important – and difficult!
Key issues:Personalisation – personal budgets and direct
paymentsClient finances – appointeeship and court of protectionFinancial risk and debt recoveryCorporate financial safeguardingWhistleblowing
Case study – Sefton MBCQuestions
BACKGROUNDLegislation – “Caring for our Future” White
Paper and Care & Support Bill2 key principles of relevance here:
Statutory duty on LAs to promote independence and well-being, reducing reliance on formal care
People should be in control of their own care – personal budgets and direct payments
Think Local Act PersonalTowards Excellence in Adult Social Care
BACKGROUNDDraft Care and Support Bill:Legal entitlement to a personal budgetThe right to request a direct paymentMinimum eligibility criteria – councils must do
written care and support plansCouncils must arrange / provide services to meet the
minimum eligible needsCouncils to have lead responsibility for safeguarding
“Self directed support is a key means of empowering people”
BACKGROUNDAn increasing profile within Audit Plans:
emerging riskInclusion on strategic / directorate risk
registers?LA restructures:
Merger of children’s and adults’ servicesSocial enterprises for ASC
PERSONALISATIONPersonal budgets and direct paymentsNW research 12/13:
Too complex and bureaucraticLack of flexibility and creative use of fundingRules too rigid, LA still promoting “preferred
providers”Making it Real:
Risk enablementFeeling in control and safeDelivered through personal budgets and self-
funding
PERSONALISATIONKey risk issues:Are there personal plans – are they
regularly reviewed?High cost panels – do they consider new
approaches?Effective brokerage services?Are staff more comfortable promoting
“virtual budgets”?Allocating monies before personal plans
agreed
PERSONALISATIONRisks to the client:Person controlling the account not using the money to
pay for careFamily member gaining access to the account and
misusing fundsPerson controlling the account forges accounting
records, payslips etc to claim for services not providedCare worker / personal assistant claims for time not
workedRecipient of DP doesn’t spend the money on appropriate
goodsRecipient does not maintain paperwork to demonstrate
appropriate expenditure
PERSONALISATIONKey controls (1):Prepaid cards:
Transaction limits / limits on cashbackMCC blocking
Staff sharing passwords with users Controls over refunds / ability to set up payments
Regular, risk-based auditing (IA role?)Monitoring turnover of carersMandates for carer’s signaturesEvidence of transactions / wage paymentsLarge transactions on respite / holidaysHours claimed checked to support plan
PERSONALISATIONKey controls (2):Staff vetting (CRB checks on PAs)Recovery of unspent balancesReassessments of care packagesWhistleblowing arrangementsEffective publicity and training
CLIENT FINANCES Appointeeship / Court of Protection
Move away from trusteeshipCentralised systems?Is this seen as a major financial system?LA management of finances a last resort?
CLIENT FINANCES Risk Issues
Delays in setting up arrangementsLack of formal paperwork – still acting as trusteesFailing to notify DWP of deaths / deal with queriesStaff not authorised to withdraw clients’ money /
exceeding authorised limitsLack of documentation relating to benefits
awards, Standing Orders, Direct Debit arrangements
Lack of separation of duties for setting up and administering accounts
CLIENT FINANCES Risk Issues
Lack of separation of duties for recording and reconciling transactions in client records
Lack of management check on accountsHigh balances on appointee accountsNil balances on accountsLack of appropriate skills / knowledge in
specialist areas, e.g. disposal of property
CLIENT FINANCES Controls for client finances in homes:
The home keeps clear records of people’s individual finances
Finances are audited monthly by the home manager or administrator and relatives are informed of transactions
The home ensures that residents receive their full entitlement of benefits and income
Care home staff report concerns about financial abuse through safeguarding procedures, to the OPG or the DWP
Local authority income teams make a safeguarding referral if a person’s care fees are not being paid
The local authority deputy maintains links with care homes in the area
FINANCIAL RISK AND DEBT RECOVERY
Following up on FACS ratings – identifying financial risk
Obtaining all relevant financial details at the assessment stage, e.g. personal pensions
Financial abuse by relatives with control over a client’s finances – safeguarding issue?
LA actions to recover debts on client contributionsTimeliness?Legal position?Best interest?
Care and Support Bill provisions
CORPORATE FINANCIAL SAFEGUARDING
What is financial abuse?“Theft, fraud, exploitation, pressure in connection with
wills, property or inheritance or financial transactions, or the misuse or misappropriation of property, possessions or benefits” (No Secrets)
However:Not all vulnerable adults are unable to protect themselves
from financial abuse and:Not all of those who are ineligible for social care services
are able to protect themselves from financial abuse
CORPORATE FINANCIAL SAFEGUARDING
Why consider financial safeguarding risks?Financial crime / abuse is often under-reportedThere are a wide range of perpetrators – family members,
friends, “professional criminals”, strangers, care workers / other professionals
There are many different types of financial abuse - losses vary from the insignificant to many thousands of pounds
The personalisation agenda can increase potential risksThe impact on the individual can be just as severe as
other types of abuse It can be difficult to identify the symptoms of financial
abuse It can be difficult to get appropriate support and advice
CORPORATE FINANCIAL SAFEGUARDING
What are the risks?
Abuse of a formal position of trust – appointees, deputies, attorneys
Abuse of an informal position of trust – family members, friends / neighbours
Theft of money / property Non-investment fraud, e.g. rogue tradersCold-calling and mass-marketing frauds Identity theft or customer impersonation
CORPORATE FINANCIAL SAFEGUARDING
What are the risks?
Frauds against the individual: Includes scams, mass marketing fraud, identity fraudCurrent estimate of £6.1 billion loss per annumScams and mass marketing - £3.5bn estimated loss per
annum, over 3 million people fall victim each year Identity fraud – over a quarter of all individuals have been
a victim at some time – average loss nearly £500 per person
Over half of the victims of identity fraud are unable to recoup their losses
CORPORATE FINANCIAL SAFEGUARDING
What can we do about these risks?Understand the warning signs – may include:
Sudden inability to pay everyday bills Reminders sent for e.g. utility bills Unexplained withdrawals of money from bank:
Single large amounts Regular smaller amounts (e.g. via ATM)
Loss of ATM / bank card or formal means of identification Personal possessions go missing from home Lack of documentation to support evidence of expenditure / income Unexplained transfer / gift of assets to a relative / someone outside
the family Suspicious changes in wills / power of attorney (particularly LPA)
CORPORATE FINANCIAL SAFEGUARDING
What can we do about these risks?Warning signs (continued):
Visitors whose visits coincide with benefits payment days Evasiveness of people in position of trust when providing
financial information Increased interest and / or involvement on person’s financial
affairs by relatives / friends Significant amounts of junk mail / cold calls Unnecessary goods, services or subscriptions purchased Deterioration in living conditions, e.g. no evidence of cleaning
Note that these are just warning signs – people can make unwise decisions, but still be competent to manage their own financial affairs
CORPORATE FINANCIAL SAFEGUARDINGWhat can we do about these risks? Incorporate these areas in assessments – identify the risks More effective liaison with the council’s financial support
sections: Client finances Income assessment and recovery teams Internal Audit / Legal Services
Early identification of potential outcomes and involvement of external agencies, e.g. DWP, OPG, Police
Awareness of reporting lines, e.g. whistleblowing Training and awareness-raising
WHISTLEBLOWINGEffective whistleblowing arrangements are a key control – but:
Does your whistleblowing procedure cover third party providers?
Do you get referrals in this area?Are all practitioners aware of your procedures and how
to use them?Would you know how to deal with a referral in this area?Is it clear how whistleblowing fits in with safeguarding
referrals and other accountability frameworks?
Sefton MBC – ‘A Real World Case Study 2008 – 2013’
N.B. Names have been changed to protect the guilty
The BackgroundSefton Employee and Relative
Residential Care from 2008
Financial Assessment / Client Contributions
Contact from Care Home May 2012
Safeguarding ‘Investigation’Ascertain Financial Position / Arrears
Ensure Placement is not in Danger
Notify Police
Appointeeship
Not a Disciplinary Matter!!!
Personnel / Internal Audit InvestigationSuspension
Initial IA Support :- Employee Role / Responsibilities- Details of Further Debts- Details of Assets / Property- Employee’s Husband- Legal Advice re Recovery
Personnel Conduct Interviews- Employee Admission
Investigation Findings/Conclusion/OutcomeEmployee WAS AppointeeConsistent Failure to Pay Client
Contributions Since 2008Unacceptable Financial Loss to CouncilFinancial Abuse of Vulnerable AdultDiscredit to the CouncilBreach of TrustEmployee Dismissed
Debt Recovery / Further ActionsDebt Increases
Options for Recovery
Sale of House
Result!!!
Lessons Learnt / Audit ImplicationsLack of Communication / Joined Up
ApproachDelays in Obtaining AppointeeshipWeaknesses in Financial Assessment
ProcessCorrect Raising of Debts &
Communication with Client’s RelativesAre There Others?Debt Recovery Procedures
What have we told you?There is a big culture shift underwayPersonalisation brings both opportunities and
risksRisk assessments may have to change –
financial safeguarding issues can be complexInternal Audit need to have constant dialogue
with managers and practitionersIt’s a great opportunity for Audit to add value
Any Questions?
It’s the last slide!References:“No Secrets: Guidance on protecting vulnerable adults in care” DoH 2000“Caring for our future: reforming care and support” DH consultation 2013“Draft Care & Support Bill” The Stationery Office 2012“A Problem Shared: making best use of resources in adult social care” Think Local Act Personal 2013“Personal Budgets: Taking Stock, Moving Forward” TLAP 2011“Assessment: financial crime against vulnerable adults” SCIE 2011
Links:www.thinklocalactpersonal.org.uk