should we convert from on-premise to on-demand solutions? david leonard director, solution...

Download Should We Convert from On-Premise to On-Demand Solutions? David Leonard Director, Solution Optimization © 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved. CS

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: holly-freeman

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Should We Convert from On-Premise to On-Demand Solutions? David Leonard Director, Solution Optimization 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved. CS
  • Slide 2
  • Our Speakers Kerry Green Union Bank of California Senior Vice President Vendor Management and Shared Services Richard Bradbury Chief Procurement Officer Commonwealth Bank of Australia 2 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 3
  • Options for On-Premise Customers 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved. 3 Hybrid On-Demand Stay on On-Premise and deploy SaaS Emerging Markets Stay on On-Premise but leverage SaaS for Spin-Off / Sub-Divisions Expansion Initial step toward SaaS and lowering TCO Lower Cost and speed of Deployment / Support Clean way to keep data separated Expanding footprint with OnD Conversion to On-Demand Convert from OnP to SaaS Stay on 9r1 Take advantage of point releases and innovation on the Cloud
  • Slide 4
  • Considerations Convert Upstream (Sourcing, Contracts) More conversion activity with our Upstream customers Ariba LIVE 2011 showcased several upstream conversions Convert Downstream (Buyer, Invoice) Steady conversion activity with our Downstream customers Typically see this as part of a broader initiative within the organization (i.e. not just an upgrade) Both conversions discussed today are P2P conversions 4 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 5
  • Union Banks Journey with Ariba Kerry Green, Senior Vice President Vendor Management and Shared Services 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 6
  • Agenda Corporate Overview Where We Started Major Milestones and Future State Why Ariba On Demand Building a Business Case Current Ariba Footprint Project Highlights New Process Change Management Keys to Success 6 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 7
  • Union Bank Corporate Overview Union Bank, N.A., is the primary subsidiary of UnionBanCal. UnionBanCal Corporation is a financial holding company with assets of $89.7 billion at December 31, 2011. UnionBanCal Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., which is a subsidiary of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. Union Bank is a proud member of the Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG, NYSE:MTU), one of the world's largest financial organizations. Union Bank is a full-service commercial bank providing an array of financial services to individuals, small businesses, middle-market companies, and major corporations. The bank has more than 11,000 employees and operated 414 banking offices in California, Oregon, Washington, Texas, and New York, as well as two international offices, on December 31, 2011. Corporate headquarters are in San Francisco, CA Masashi Oka is president and CEO. 7 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 8
  • Where We Started Ariba Buyer implemented across the Bank for Purchasing. Only capturing approx 10% of commodity spend on POs through Ariba Buyer. Not capturing complex spend (e.g. software and professional services, marketing, etc.). A/P was a paper-based process. No end-user visibility into PO status (e.g. ability to see remaining funds on PO or payments against PO). Limited access to financial information to support sourcing projects. 8 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 9
  • Major Milestones and Future State Develop a Strategic Sourcing Organization to support the Bank. Capture and actively source spend areas across the Bank to leverage spend and increase price performance. Design an integrated Source-to-Pay program to increase control and provide detailed commitment and spend data at an end-user level. Increase use of POs to capture spend. Automate the Accounts Payable process. Ability to proactively manage our vendor expenses at the user level. 9 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 10
  • Building a Business Case Why Upgrade (or) Convert to On Demand? Do Nothing Pro: Keep the functionality and technical interfaces we have today. Con: Maintenance increased due to Retired Product Support Program; UB concerns on support of older version over time; Limited functionality to capture complex spend on POs. Upgrade current system Pro: Keep similar feel and functionality as what we have today and get benefits included in each upgrade. Con: No additional functionality to capture complex spend on POs; Behind-the-firewall software upgrades and enhancements will be less frequent; Continued maintenance and infrastructure costs. Replace Buyer with On Demand Pro: Capture significantly more spend on POs through Ariba; Greatly increased functionality; Automates more business processes; Directionally same cost as annual maintenance; Eliminate internal infrastructure costs; Ariba upgrades and enhances more frequently included in the annual cost. Con: May impact how we interface technically with Buyer today; Bank no longer owns the software. 10 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 11
  • Why Ariba On Demand Bank selected Aribas On Demand (SaaS) model. Strong return on investment, plus greatly increased functionality. Ease of implementation, maintenance and ongoing upgrades. Ariba is ERP-agnostic. Improves business process by tying together Purchasing and Payables and automating the functions. Ability to leverage best practice and market leading processes. No additional infrastructure needed, all hosted by Ariba. Reduces existing infrastructure and expense by removing Ariba Buyer and other ad hoc tools. Access to Ariba Discovery for real time market based pricing knowledge. Ariba On Demand made it cost effective to add upstream modules (e.g. Sourcing and SIPM). 11 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 12
  • Project Highlights Converted downstream from CD to On Demand and implemented the Sourcing and SIPM module Deployment Ariba estimated approximately an 18- to 20-week deployment. Actual implementation nine months. Capture of spend on PO Increase spend on PO, with a goal of 50-70% Scalable, best practice, Purchase-to-Pay program As the Bank grows, easier to scale and expand Aribas automated platform vs. the Banks Ariba Buyer platform. 12 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 13
  • New Process Sourcing and Procurement Process Requisition Response Supplier Management Contract Negotiations and Terms Order Lifecycle Mgmt and Tracking Invoicing and Reconciliation Spend Analysis/ Demand Management Category Management Reporting & Analytics Visibility real-time spend and supplier data Compliance programs, process and contract terms Cash management auto triple match, invoice and allocations Services Supplier Relationship Management Unifying sourcing, purchasing and supplier management Streamlines buyer and supplier collaboration More efficient and accurate invoice to payment cycles Real-time visibility for spend and supplier analysis Single platform for any time, milestone or fee-based service Unifying sourcing, purchasing and supplier management Streamlines buyer and supplier collaboration More efficient and accurate invoice to payment cycles Real-time visibility for spend and supplier analysis Single platform for any time, milestone or fee-based service 13 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 14
  • Change Management Keys to Success Change Management is a key to success. Implementation of an overall Communication Plan, including Webex and personal training for super-users; multiple communications to all end users; ad hoc training; etc. Required more resources than suggested. Ariba guidelines severely underestimated the number of hours/resources to implement the system. Recommend strong joint planning sessions with Ariba prior to signing the agreement to understand current environment and future state to streamline implementation. Develop a both a business and technical plan. If moving from behind the firewall to an on-demand system, ensure IT completely understands the impact of the move to their role. Aggressively move spend into the system and have senior management support. Stealthing in the spend is not effective as it is wasting the value of the investment. 14 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 15
  • Commonwealth Banks Move to Ariba On Demand Richard Bradbury Chief Procurement Officer Commonwealth Bank of Australia 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 16
  • Agenda Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) Procurement at CBA Drivers for Change Options and Criteria Our Evaluation Approach Why Ariba On Demand Simple and Easy Program 16 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 17
  • Commonwealth Bank Corporate Overview Total Assets of $704bn Market Cap of $80bn 14 million customers 52,000 staff 17 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 nd largest company in Australia 9 th largest bank in the world by market capitalization Headquarters in Sydney
  • Slide 18
  • Procurement at CBA Regional, centre-led operational model $5 bn non salary and wages annual spend Only capturing approximately $1.3bn of spend on POs through Ariba today Upgraded to Ariba version 8 in June 2008 Poor analytical and reporting capability Procurement Transformation Program underway Project to migrate to Ariba On Demand started February 2012 18 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 19
  • Drivers for Change 19 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved. Lack of ability to leverage spend and source effectively Inability to manage expenses, contracts and supplier at a user level Current platform will be unsupported and incompatible with other systems Incomplete data and therefore visibility of opportunities Poor user experience Lack of visibility of spend and compliance to preferred suppliers Inability to enforce policy How procurement transformation can drive sustainable benefits 1 2 3 Maverick buying and lack of contract management quickly erode value (10-50%) Contractual compliance and continuous improvement Break through performance improvement Time Demand and Sourcing (5-15%) Supplier collaboration (2-5%) Efficiency benefits Strategic sourcing Compliance and supplier relationship management Contract award 1 2 2 3 3 Sourcing capability P2P processes and systems Procurement operating model Sustainable benefits at risk without systems, streamlined process controls Typical procurement benchmark. Indicative savings
  • Slide 20
  • Options and Criteria for Selection OPTIONS Do Nothing Upgrade Ariba On Premise Move to Ariba On Demand Move to alternative software (including ERP) CRITERIA Useability and support of benefits delivery Making it easy for users to do the right thing and comply with policy; Adoption of standard processes; Efficiency of standard tasks; e.g. raising a purchase request Quality data capture and clear reporting and analysis Functionality Can the solutions deliver best practice in capability and effectiveness of processes? Reporting and analytics (BI) formed part of this review Total Cost of Ownership 20 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 21
  • Our Evaluation Approach 21 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved. Assessment CriteriaAssessment AreaAssessment Factors Useability and support of benefits delivery Useability Intuitive User Interface (likely adoption of CBA preferred spend channels) Simple and easy processes Change Management demands Functional and Technical Fit Functional (40%) Fit against Procurement Services Model (Demand, Source, Fulfil and Manage) Emphasis on delivering leading practice capability and processes. Consideration given to BI requirements Implementation (15%) Ease and time to implement Resource availability (internal and external) Level of configuration and customisation Data migration Operational (15%) Integration Flexibility Availability of support skills (internal and external) Strategic (30%) Ability to support our business strategy Alignment with ES Strategy Multi-entity / multi-currency capability Analyst view Total Cost of Ownership Cost Project implementation cost Operational costs including release support Cost of future upgrades
  • Slide 22
  • Why Ariba On Demand? Strong business case Highest level of usability Comprehensive process model Market leader Strong functionality aligned to our services model Easiest to implement Integrates well with other systems Simple to maintain and upgrade Savings on infrastructure 22 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 23
  • 12 month program to implement Ariba on Demand in two phases Address our pain points Change is the key 23 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 24
  • Dont Miss the General Session Panel Today at 5:15 p.m. 2012 Ariba, Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Sustainable Supply Chains through Vested Trading Partner Relationships Long-term, mutually beneficial partnerships between buyers and suppliers are increasingly being described as vested relationships, defined by a shared vision, agreed-upon desired outcomes, transparency, trust, and win-win. Developing such trading partner relationships pays dividends in many ways, particularly when your goal is ensuring a sustainable supply chain. Join Tim Minahan, chief marketing officer for Ariba, as he explores the concept with Kate Vitasek, author of Vested Outsourcing, and Tim McBride, general manager for global finance shared services at Microsoft. Mr. Minahan and his guests will engage with Ariba customers who will talk about such investments at their companies, and the impact they have on their comprehensive sustainability programs. 5:15 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Florentine III and IV