shell n tube
DESCRIPTION
lab reportTRANSCRIPT
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARAFAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN KIMIA
PROCESS ENGINEERING LABORATORY II(CPE554)
NAME : SHEH MUHAMMAD AFNAN BIN SEH HANAFISTUDENT ID : 2013210382GROUP : EH2214AEXPERIMENT : SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGERDATE PERFORMED : 8TH APRIL 2015SEMESTER : 4PROGRAMME / CODE : EH221/ CPE554SUBMIT TO : MS HABSAH ALWI
No. Title Allocated Marks (%) Marks
1 Abstract/Summary 52 Introduction 53 Aims 54 Theory 55 Apparatus 56 Methodology/Procedure 107 Results 108 Calculations 109 Discussion 20
10 Conclusion 1011 Recommendations 512 Reference 513 Appendix 5
TOTAL MARKS 100Remarks:
Checked by: Rechecked by
--------------------------- ---------------------------
Date: Date :
ABSTRACT
In this experiment, the objective is to determine the efficiency of enhanced concentric
shell-tube heat exchanger using water as the heat exchange medium for counter-current flow heat
exchanger. The experiment was also to evaluate the heat transfer and heat loss for energy balance,
LMTD, heat transfer coefficient, overall heat transfer coefficient (U) and the pressure drop of the
shell and tube heat exchanger. The instrument was combined with thermometer , thus the TT1(hot
in) , TT2(hot out) , TT3(cold in) , TT4( cold out) can be measured. At first, the hot water water
flow rate (FT1) was set to fixed which is 10LPM and cold water flow rate (FT2) was varied.The
experiment then repeated by varied the hot water water flow rate (FT1) and fixing the cold water
flow rate (FT2) to 10LPM . The data is being recorded for temperature and pressure for each flow
rates within 10 minutes interval. From the results, it can be concluded that the pressure drop is
depends on flow rate not the temperature. Furthermore, for shell and tube heat transfer coefficient
is depends on flow rate, which is for tube coefficient is constant because the flow rate is constant
but for shell coefficient, the shell coefficient is increase as the flow rate is increase
INTRODUCTION
Heat exchanger is a device which is used for transferring energy in the form of heat from
one fluid to another. In some cases, a solid wall may separate the fluids and prevent them from
mixing. In other designs, the fluids may be in direct contact with each other. In the most efficient
heat exchangers, the surface area of the wall between the fluids is maximized while simultaneously
minimizing the fluid flow resistance. Fins or corrugations are sometimes used with the wall in
order to increase the surface area and to induce turbulence. Heat exchangers are widely used in the
process industries so their design has been highly developed. Most exchangers are liquid-to-liquid,
but gas and no condensing vapours can also be treated in them.
Shell and tube heat exchanger is most common type of heat exchanger been used in
industrial applications. Shell and tube heat exchanger placed a large number of tubes, about
several hundred packed in a shell with their axes parallel to that of their shell. Heat transfer take
place as one fluid flows inside the tube, while the other tube flows throughout the shell. Baffles
installed inside the shell functions to force shell-side fluid to flow across the shell and to
increase residence time so that enhance heat transfer between the fluids. Besides, baffles
also placed in the shell to maintain uniform spacing between the tubes. Note that the tubes in
shell tube heat exchanger are connected to large flow area called header at both ends of the shell,
parts where fluid accumulates before entering the tubes and after leaving them. In the counter-
flow heat exchanger, the fluids enter the exchanger from opposite sides. This is the most efficient
design because it transfers the greatest amount of heat. Next, counter current heat exchangers
allow the highest log mean temperature difference between the hot and cold streams. Many
companies however do not use single pass heat exchangers because they can break easily in
addition to being more expensive to build. Often multiple heat exchangers can be used to
simulate the counter current flow of a single large exchanger. In the parallel-flow heat
exchanger, the fluids come in from the same end and move parallel to each other as they flow to
the other side. The coss-flow heat exchanger moves the fluids in a perpendicular fashion.
Figure 1: Concurrent and countercurrent flow
Figure 2 : the schematic of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger (one shell pass one tube pass)
OBJECTIVES
1. To determine the function of the shell and tube heat exchanger
2. To evaluate the value of heat transfer and heat loss, LMTD, heat transfer coefficient, overall
heat transfer coefficient and the pressure drop
THEORY
The Heat Exchanger Design Equation
Heat exchanger theory leads to the basic heat exchanger design equation:
Q = U A ΔTlm , where
Q is the rate of heat transfer between the two fluids in the heat exchanger in W,
U is the overall heat transfer coefficient in W/m2.k,
A is the heat transfer surface area in m2,
and ΔTlm is the log mean temperature difference in K, calculated from the inlet and outlet
temperatures of both fluids.
The basic heat exchanger design equation can be used to calculate the overall heat transfer
coefficient for known or estimated values of the other three parameters, Q, A, and ΔT lm. Each of
those parameters will now be discussed briefly.
Heat Transfer Rate, Q
Heat transfer rate, Q can be calculated from the known flow rate of one of the fluids, its heat
capacity, and the required temperature change. Following is the equation to be used:
Qhot = mt Cpt (THin - THout) = Ws Cps (TCout - TCin) , where
mt = mass flow rate of hot fluid, kg/s,
Cpt = heat capacity of the hot fluid, J/s,
Ws = mass flow rate of cold fluid, kg/s,
Cps = heat capacity of the cold fluid, J/s,
The required heat transfer rate can be determined from known flow rate, heat capacity and
temperature change for either the hot fluid or the cold fluid. Then either the flow rate of the other
fluid for a specified temperature change, or the outlet temperature for known flow rate and inlet
temperature can be calculated.
Log Mean Temperature Difference
The driving force for any heat transfer process is a temperature difference. For heat exchangers,
there are two fluids involved, with the temperatures of both changing as they pass through the heat
exchanger, so some type of average temperature difference is needed. Log mean temperature is
defined in terms of the temperature differences as shown in the equation at below. Th,inand Th,out are
the inlet and outlet temperatures of the hot fluid and Tc,in and Tc,out are the inlet and outlet
temperatures of the cold fluid.
For Counter current flow,
ΔT1 = T hot, in – T cold, out ΔT2 = T hot, out – T cold, in
T hot, in = Inlet temperature of hot fluid (oC ) , T hot, out = Outlet temperature of hot fluid (oC )
T cold, in = Inlet temperature of cold fluid (oC), T cold, out = Outlet temperature of cold fluid (oC
For the counter flow direction as in Figure 3, the fluids enter at opposite ends, flow in opposite
directions, and leave at opposite ends. Once value of ΔTLM and area, A is obtained, the overall
heat transfer coefficient can be determined. Heat transfer rate, Q also can be calculated using
this formula
Q = m x Cp x ΔT
For constant specific heats with no change of phase, the heat balance for both co-current and
counter current flow is Q = (mc Cpc)cold (Tc2 − Tc1) = (mh Cph)hot (Th1 − Th2)
Cp at specified temperature of liquid water as given in appendices Table A1. Interpolation
required the efficiency or effectiveness, Ɛ of the heat exchanger is ration of actual heat transfer
rate, Q over the maximum possible heat transfer rate, Qmax . The equation is
Ɛ = Q
Qmax
Where Qmax is calculated from following equation: Qmax = Cmin (T hot in - T cold in ).Cmin
value is chosen either from Ch or Cc value calculated. The lowest value between these two is
chosen as Cmin.
Chot = mh cp hot , Ccold= mc cp cold
The temperature profiles in the heat exchanger can be study by looking at the
characteristics of the heat exchangers which are the flow arrangement ( either the hot and cold
fluids move in the same or opposite directions) and type of construction. The temperature
profile obtained from chart of temperature difference between the hot fluid and cold fluid at inlet
and outlet. It may vary along the length of the heat exchanger. This is due to the fact that the hot
fluid temperature decreases as it transfers heat to the cold fluid, while the cold fluid temperature
increases. As shown in the figure 3.1 below, for co-current flow arrangement, the temperature
difference is maximum at the inlet and decreases slowly towards the outlet. For counter-
current flow arrangement, the difference between the temperature of the hot and cold fluid
almost uniform, means that the heat transfer rate at any location is usually maximum at any
location throughout the tube. The temperature difference decreases less dramatically compared
to parallel flow arrangement as we move towards hot fluid exit. For either flow arrangement, it
can be observed that the ∆T is not constant and changes along the length of a heat exchanger.
12
Figure 3 : Counter current flow Temp. profile
APPARATUS AND MATERIAL
Figure 4 : SOLTEQ Heat Exchanger Training Apparatus (HE 158C)
13
1. Spiral heat exchanger 12. TT1 (hot water inlet reading)
13. TT2 (hot water outlet reading)
14. TT3 (cold water inlet reading)
2. Concentric heat exchanger
3. Shell and tube heat exchanger
4. Valve 1715. TT4 (cold water outlet reading)
5. Valve 1516. TT5
6. Valve 16
7. Valve 1817. ΔPT1 reading
8. Hot water centrifugal pump18. ΔPT2 reading
9. Cold water centrifugal pump 19. Heater switch
10. Flowrate meter 1 (Hot water) 20. Hot water pump switch
11. Flowrate meter 2 (Cold water) 21. Cold water pump switch
14
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
General Start-Up Procedure
Note : Whenever the annunciator TAH3 is activated during the course of the experiment,
press the red acknowledge button to stop the buzzer.
1. All the pump suction valves (for PH, PC1, PC2) was checked to make sure all valves are
fully opened at the time.
2. The BVC2 is fully opened but the CV2 is fully shut so that PC2 shall operate as a
backing-mixing pump for tank T2 in the next experiment. Both CV1 and BVC1 are fully
opened. Only PC1 shall be used here to pump CW into the Heat Exchanger in the next
experiment. (CW pumps (PC1 and PC2) were not opened yet).
3. The HV was shut fully while the BVH is fully opened.
4. The pump PH was started to circulate the around tank T1 via only BVH.
5. Then, the heater was switched on and the temperature of TIC5 was noted. When the HW
in the tank T1 was almost 50 (see TT5), the HV was fully opened. Then, the HW
flowrate was adjusted to about 25 USGPM by regulating the by-pass valve BVH.
6. The CW pumps PC1 and PC2 were switched on simultaneously. Then, the CW flowrate
was adjusted to 10 LPM by regulating the by-pass valve BVC1.
7. The DP Selector Switch was switched to the DP (Shell) position.
Experiment 1 : Counter- Current Flow Direction inside Shell and Tube Heat
Exchanger
1. General start-up procedures was performed.
2. The valves were switched to the counter-current Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger
arrangement. V15 and V18 were opened while V16 and V17 were closed.
3. Heater switch, Pump P1 and P2 was switched on. TT5 is ensured to be at 50
4. The valves V3 and V14 were adjusted to desired flow rates for hot water and cold water
stream .
5. The system is left ,run for 10 minutes until steady state operating condition is reached.
6. FT1, FT2, TT1, TT2, TT3 and TT4 readings were recorded after next 3 minutes to
after the process has stable.
7. Pressure drop measurement for shell-side and tube-side was taken at DPT1 and DPT2
readings
8. Steps 4 till 7 was repeated for different combination of flow rates FT1 and FT2.
9. V15 and V18 is tightly closed.
General Shut-down Procedures
1. Heater is switched off and waits until hot water temperature drops below 40℃.
2. Pump P1 and P2 was switched off.
3. All water was drained off in the process lines. Water retained in the hot and cold water
tanks for next laboratory session.
4. All valves are closed.
RESULT
Counter current flow for constant hot water flow rate
FT1(LPM) FT2(LPM) TT1(OC) TT2(OC) TT3(OC) TT4(OC) DT1(mmH2O) DDT2(mmH2O)
10 2 49.2 47.8 31.5 44.8 91 3
10 4 49.0 46.7 31.4 39.6 92 17
10 6 49.3 46.0 30.5 36.7 93 67
10 8 48.9 45.4 30.2 35.2 93 126
10 10 48.9 45.1 30.9 34.5 93 243
Counter current flow for constant cold water flow rate
FT1(LPM) FT2(LPM) TT1(OC) TT2(OC) TT3(OC) TT4(OC) DT1(mmH2O) DDT2(mmH2O)
2 10 48.7 39.9 30.8 32.4 -5 243
4 10 49.2 43.5 30.9 32.8 2 238
6 10 49.4 44.1 30.6 33.4 22 242
8 10 49.5 45.0 30.5 34.3 50 240
10 10 49.4 45.4 30.5 34.5 87 245
FOR FIXED HOT WATER FLOW RATE AT 10LPM
TEST 1 TEST 2 TEST 3 TEST 4 TEST 5
Hot water (Tube)
Volumetric flow rate L/min 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Mass flow Kg/s 0.1647 0.1647 0.1647 0.1647 0.1647
Inlet temperature 0C 49.2 49.0 49.3 48.9 48.9
Outlet temperature 0C 47.8 46.7 46.0 45.4 45.1
Heat transfer rate J/s 962.65 1581.50 2269.11 2406.63 2612.91
Pressure drop mmH20 91 92 93 93 93
Cold fluid (Shell)
Volumetric flow rate L/min 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Mass flow Kg/s 0.0332 0.0664 0.1000 0.1328 0.1659
Inlet temperature 0C 31.5 31.4 30.5 30.2 30.9
Outlet temperature 0C 44.8 39.6 36.7 35.2 34.5
Heat transfer rate J/s 1846.43 2276.81 2582.23 2776.59 2498.93
Pressure drop mmH20 3 17 67 126 243
Temp difference
Hot side inlet T,TT1 0C 49.2 49.0 49.3 48.9 48.9
Hot side outlet T,TT2 0C 47.8 46.7 46.0 45.4 45.1
Cold side inlet T,TT3 0C 31.5 31.4 30.5 30.2 30.9
Cold side outlet T,TT4 0C 44.8 39.6 36.7 35.2 34.5
T log mean, Tlm 0C 9.09 12.11 14.00 14.44 14.30
Heat loss W -883.78 -695.31 -313.12 -369.96 113.98
Efficiency % 191.81 143.97 113.80 215.37 95.64
Overall heat transfer
coefficient
Total exchange area m2 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Overall heat transfer
coefficient
W/m2.K 706.01 870.63 1080.53 1111.09 1218.14
Exchanger layout
Tube 1 1 1 1 1
Shell 1 1 1 1 1
Length of tubes m 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Tube ID mm 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75
Tube OD mm 9.53 9.53 9.53 9.53 9.53
Tube pitch mm 18 18 18 18 18
Tube surface area m2 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150
Number of tubes 10 10 10 10 10
Shell diameter mm 85 85 85 85 85
Baffle distance mm 50 50 50 50 50
Tube side
Cross section area m2 0.0000472 0.0000472 0.0000472 0.0000472 0.0000472
Number of tubes 10 10 10 10 10
Total cross section area m2 0.000472 0.000472 0.000472 0.000472 0.000472
Mass velocity Kg/m2.s 349.13 349.13 349.13 345.64 342.15
Linear velocity m/s 0.3533 0.3533 0.3533 0.3498 0.3462
Reynolds number 4924.98 4924.98 4924.98 4875.73 4826.48
Prandtl number 3.56 3.56 3.56 3.56 3.56
Type of flow turbulent turbulent turbulent turbulent Turbulent
L/ID 64.52 64.52 64.52 64.52 64.52
Heat transfer factor,
Jh
0.0039 0.0039 0.0039 0.0039 0.0039
Tube coefficient,
Hi
W/m2.K 2426.16 2426.16 2426.16 2401.90 2377.64
Shell side
Cross flow area m2 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Mass velocity Kg/m2.s 16.60 31.53 46.47 60.57 75.51
Linear velocity m/s 0.0167 0.0317 0.0467 0.0608 0.0758
Equivalent diameter mm 27.78 27.78 27.78 27.78 27.78
Reynolds number 575.88 1094.17 1612.46 2101.96 2620.25
Prandtl number 5.44 5.44 5.44 5.44 5.44
Type of flow laminar laminar laminar laminar laminar
Baffle cut % 20 20 20 20 20
Heat transfer factor,jh 0.023 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012
Shell coeffient,hs W/m2.K 513.18 763.08 999.59 1140.16 1218.25
Pressure drop across
heat exchanger
Tube-side friction
factor, Jf
0.0058 0.0058 0.0058 0.0058 0.0058
Shell-side friction
factor, Jf
0.098 0.086 0.075 0.072 0.070
Tube-side pressure drop,
DPtube (Pa)
338.8 338.8 338.8 332.1 325.4
Tube-side pressure drop,
DPtube (mmH20)
33.4 33.4 33.4 32.8 32.1
Shell-side pressure drop,
DPshell (Pa)
0.3 10.5 19.9 32.5 49.1
Shell-side pressure drop,
DPshell (mmH2O)
0.3 1.0 2.0 3.2 4.8
FOR FIXED COLD WATER FLOW RATE AT 10LPM
TEST 1 TEST 2 TEST 3 TEST 4 TEST 5
Hot fluid (Tube)
Volumetric flow rate L/min 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Mass flow Kg/s 0.0329 0.0659 0.0988 0.1318 0.1647
Inlet temperature 0C 48.7 49.2 49.4 49.5 49.4
Outlet temperature 0C 39.9 43.5 44.1 45.0 45.4
Heat transfer rate J/s 1210.19 1567.75 2186.60 2475.39 2750.43
Cold fluid (Shell)
Volumetric flow rate L/min 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Mass flow Kg/s 0.1659 0.1659 0.1659 0.1659 0.1659
Inlet temperature 0C 30.8 30.9 30.6 30.5 30.5
Outlet temperature 0C 32.4 32.8 33.4 34.3 34.6
Heat transfer rate J/s 1110.64 1318.88 1943.61 2637.76 2776.59
Temp difference
Hot side inlet T,TT1 0C 48.7 49.2 49.4 49.5 49.4
Hot side outlet T,TT2 0C 39.9 43.5 44.1 45.0 45.4
Cold side inlet T,TT3 0C 30.8 30.9 30.6 30.5 30.5
Cold side outlet T,TT4 0C 32.4 32.8 33.4 34.3 34.6
T log mean, Tlm 0C 12.35 14.42 14.71 14.85 14.85
Heat loss W 99.55 248.87 242.99 -162.37 -26.16
Efficiency % 91.77 84.13 88.89 106.56 100.95
Overall heat transfer
coefficient
Total exchange area m2 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Overall heat transfer
coeffient
W/m2.K 653.27 724.80 990.98 1111.29 1234.76
Exchanger layout
Tube 1 1 1 1 1
Shell 1 1 1 1 1
Length of tubes m 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Tube ID mm 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75
Tube OD mm 9.53 9.53 9.53 9.53 9.53
Tube pitch mm 18 18 18 18 18
Tube surface area m2 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150 0.0150
Number of tubes 10 10 10 10 10
Shell diameter mm 85 85 85 85 85
Baffle distance mm 50 50 50 50 50
Tube side
Cross section area m2 0.0000472 0.0000472 0.0000472 0.0000472 0.0000472
Number of tubes 10 10 10 10 10
Total cross section area m2 0.000472 0.000472 0.000472 0.000472 0.000472
Mass velocity Kg/m2.s 69.79 139.57 209.36 279.15 348.93
Linear velocity m/s 0.0706 0.1412 0.2119 0.2825 0.3531
Reynolds 984.48 1968.82 2953.29 3937.77 4922.11
Prandtl number 3.56 3.56 3.56 3.56 3.56
Type of flow Laminar Laminar turbulent turbulent Turbulent
L/ID 64.52 64.52 64.52 64.52 64.52
Heat transfer factor, Jh 0.0050 0.0030 0.0036 0.0039 0.0040
Tube coefficient, hi W/m2.K 621.54 745.80 1342.46 1939.13 2486.02
Shell side
Cross flow area m2 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Mass velocity Kg/m2.s 82.97 82.97 82.97 82.97 82.97
Linear velocity m/s 0.0833 0.0833 0.0833 0.0833 0.0833
Equivalent diameter mm 27.78 27.78 27.78 27.78 27.78
Reynolds number 2880.69 2880.69 2880.69 2880.96 2880.69
Prandtl number 5.44 5.44 5.44 5.44 5.44
Type of flow laminar laminar laminar laminar Laminar
Baffle cut % 20 20 20 20 20
Heat transfer factor, Jh 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Shell coefficient, hs W/m2.K 1510.37 1510.37 1510.37 1510.37 1510.37
Pressure drop across
heat exchanger
Tube-side friction
factor, Jf
0.0058 0.0058 0.0058 0.0058 0.0058
Shell-side friction
factor,Jf
0.098 0.086 0.075 0.072 0.070
Tube-side pressure
drop,DPtube (Pa)
13.05 41.37 100.39 184.97 292.26
Shell-side pressure
drop,DPshell (Pa)
8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53 8.53
Temperature Profile for Counter-current Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
1 20
10
20
30
40
50
60
TT2
TT4
Temperature Profile
Hot waterCold water
Tem
pera
ture
Figure 5 : Temperature profile of heat exchanger
Overall heat transfer coefficient
2 4 6 8 100
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Overall heat transfer coefficient against cold water flowrate
Cold water flow rate(L/min)
Ove
rall
hea
t tr
ansf
er
coef
fici
ent(
W/m
2K
Figure 6 : Graph of overall heat transfer coefficient against cold water flow rate
2 4 6 8 100
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Overall Heat Transfer coefficient Vs Cold Water Flow rate
tube sideshell side
Cold water flow rate(L/min)
Ove
rall
heat
tran
sfer
coe
ffici
ent(
W/m
2K
Figure 7 : Graph of relationship between heat transfer coefficient and cold water flow rate
CALCULATIONS
Typical Chemical Data :
HOT WATER COLD WATER
Density (kg/m3) 988.18 995.67
Heat Capacity (J/kg.K) 4175.00 4183.00
Thermal cond. (W/m.K) 0.6436 0.6155
Viscosity (Pa.s) 0.0005494 0.0008007
For fixed Hot Water Flowrate (10 LPM)
Cold Water Flowrate = 2.0 LPM
HOT WATER (tube side) COLD WATER (shell side)
Volume flow (L/min) 10.0 2.0
Inlet temperature,(℃) 49.2(TT1) 31.5 (TT3)
Outlet temperature(℃) 47.8 (TT2) 44.8 (TT4)
1. Calculation of Heat transfer and heat lost :
The heat transfer rates of both hot and cold water are both calculated using the heat balance
equation.
Heat transfer rate for hot water,
QH=mHCpH (T1−T2 )=10.0Lmin
×1m3
1000L×
1min60 s
×988.18kg
m3 ×4175Jkg .℃
× (49.2−47.8 )℃
¿962.65W
Heat transfer rate for cold water,
QC=mCC pC (t 2−t 1)=2.0L
min×
1m3
1000 L×
1min60 s
×995.67 kg
m3 ×4183 Jkg .℃
× (44.8−31.5 )℃
¿1846.43W
Heat lost rate = QH−QC=(962.65−1846.43 )W=−883.78W
Efficiency =
QC
QH
×100 %=1846.43W962.65W
×100 %=191.81 %
2. Calculation of LMTD
∆T 1=T h ,∈¿−T c,out=49.2−44.8=4.4 ℃ ¿
∆T 2=T h ,out−Tc ,∈¿=47.8−31.5=16.3℃¿
∆T lm=∆T 1−∆T 2
ln (∆T1
∆T2
)= 4.4−16.3
ln ( 4.416.3
)=9.09℃
3. Calculation of the tube and shell heat transfer coefficients by Kern’s method :
For 1-shell pass; 1-tube pass, ∆T m=∆T lm
Heat transfer coefficient at tube side :
Cross flow area, A=π d i
2
4=π ×0.007752
4=0.0000472m2
Total cross flow area, At=A×numberof tubes=0.0000472m2×10=0.000472m2
Mass velocity ,Gt=mt
A t
= 0.16470.000472
=349.13kgm2 . s
Linear velocity , ut=Gt
ρ=
349.13kg
m2 . s988.18kg/m3 =0.3533m /s
Renolds number ,ℜ=Gt×de
μ=
349.13 kg
m2 . s×7.75m
0.0005494 Pa . s×
11000
=4924.9(turbulent flow)
Prandtl , Pr=μ×CpH
k=
0.0005494 Pa. s×4175J
kg . K
0.6436W
m .K
=3.56
Tube side heat transfer factor, jh = 0.0039 (From Appendix)
Tube side coefficient ,h i=jhℜPr0.33 k
d i
=0.0039×4924.9×3.560.33×0.64360.00775
=2425.2W
m2. K
Heat transfer coefficient at shell side :
Cross flow area, A s=[ (tube pitch−TubeOD )× (shell diameter )× (baffle distance )]
tube pitch=¿¿
Mass velocity ,G s=W s
A s
=
0.0332kgs
0.002m2 =16.60kg
m2 . s
Linear velocity , us=G s
ρ=
16.60kg
m2 . s995.67 kg/m3 =0.0167m /s
Equivalent diameter , de=1.1d0
( ρt2−0.917d02 )= 1.1
9.53(182−0.917 (9.53 )2 )mm=27.78mm
Reynolds number ,ℜ=G s×de
μ=
16.60kg
m2. s×27.78mm
0.0008007 Pa . s×
11000
=575.93 (laminar flow)
Prandtl number ,Pr=μ×CpC
k=
0.0008007 Pa. s ×4183J
kg . K
0.6155W
m .K
=5.44
Shell side heat transfer factor, jh = 0.022 ( From Appendix)
Shell side coefficient , hi=jh ℜPr0.33k
de=0.022×575.93×5.440.33×0.6155
0.02778=490.95
Wm2 .K
Overall heat transfer coefficient :
Total exchange area, A=numberof tube×π ×tubeOD×lenght of tube=10×π×0.00953m×0.5m=0.15m2
Overall heat transfer coefficient ,U=QH
A ∆T lm
= 962.65W0.15m2×9.09℃
=706.01W
m2 .℃
4. Calculation of pressure drop across tube and shell
∆ Pt=N p
ρu t2
2 [8 j f ( Ld i )( μμw )
−m
+2.5 ]=1×988.18kg /m3×(0.3533
ms)
2
2¿
Jf = 0.0057 (from appendix)
∆ P s=8 j f (Ds
de)( LIB ) ρ us
2
2 ( μμw )
−0.14
=(8×0.092 )( 0.085m0.02778m )( 0.5m
0.05m )( 995.67kgm3 )¿¿
DISCUSSION
This experiment was conducted in order to determine the performance and
effectiveness of heat transfer between hot fluid and cold fluid in a shell and tube heat
exchanger with different flow pattern for counter current flow. Besides that are to study the
heat balance, Log mean temperature (LMTD) and overall heat transfer coefficient. In order to
get pressure drop, Reynolds number and Prandtl number at the shell-tube heat exchanger
need to be determined. This experiment was also affected by flow rate of the fluid when hot
water flow rate is constant, the cold water flow rate become the manipulated variable at
interval of 2 LPM, and vice versa.
For counter current flow and constant hot water flow rate, the data of hot fluid
collected shows temperature of hot water out is lower than the temperature of hot water in,
meanwhile for cold fluid it shows that the temperature of cold water in is higher than the inlet
temperature of cold water. For data of constant cold water and manipulated hot water flow
rate, it shows that outlet temperature of hot fluid is lower than the inlet temperature and as for
cold fluid, the inlet temperature is lower than the outlet temperature.
The heat balance was calculated for all sets of data. As we can see, the efficiencies of
counter current flow heat exchanger are increase as the cold water flow rate increase. For
tube side heat transfer coefficient, the value is constant at 2425.2 W/m2K. Type of flow of
tube side is turbulent flow which is constant at 4924.9. Next for shell side, the shell
coefficient is increase as the cold flow rate is increase. This conclusion is proved by looking
at the graph at Figure 9. Type of flow is laminar flow which is the range is between 513.18
and 1218.25. For overall heat transfer coefficient, the value for test 1 is 706.01 W/m2K, for
test 2 is 870.63 W/m2K, for test 3 is 1080.53W/m2K, test 4 is 1111.09 W/m2K and test 5 is
1218.14 W/m2K. Based on result we can conclude that the value of overall heat transfer
coefficient is increase as the cold flow rate increase and it is proved by looking at graph at
Figure 6.
For pressure drop in hot water which is tube side, 338.8 Pa was calculated but for
measured value is increase from 3 to 243 mmH2O. For pressure drop in cold water which is
shell side, the value is 0.3 Pa for test 1, 10.5Pa for test 2, 19.9Pa for test 3, 32.5Pa for test 4
and 49.1Pa for test 5.
For pressure drop in cold water which is shell side, 8.53 Pa was calculated but for
measured value is increase from -5 to 87 mmH2O. For pressure drop in hot water which is
tube side, the value is 13.05 Pa for test 1, 41.37Pa for test 2, 100.39Pa for test 3, 184.97Pa for
test 4 and 292.26Pa for test 5. But for measure value of pressure drop, the value is 243
mmH2O for test 238 mmH2O for test 2, 242 mmH2O for test 3, 240 mmH2O for test 4 and
245mmH2Ofor test 5. Maybe some error had been done while handling the equipment.
The graph plotted in Figure 5 shows inlet temperature of hot fluid is higher than the
outlet and as for cold fluid the inlet temperature is lower than the outlet temperature as it
increases throughout the process.
From result above, the pressure drop is depends on the flow rate not the temperature. The
pressure drop is increase as the cold flow rate increase and constant at tube side because the
flow rate is constant at 10 LPM. Same goes to heat transfer coefficient for tube side and shell
side. For tube side, the value of tube coefficient is constant as the hot water flow rate is
constant at 10 LPM but for shell coefficient, the value is increasing as the cold water flow
rate increase. The pressure drop is depend on the flow rates as the flow rates is changed the
pressure drop also change. This is due to the flow does not achieved the steady state yet.
CONCLUSION
The purpose of this experiment is to analyze the efficiency and performance of
enhanced concentric tube and shell and tube heat exchangers using water as the heat
exchange medium for counter-current flow heat exchanger. Based on evaluate and study the
performance of shell and tube heat exchanger at counter current flow was determined.
Besides that, the heat balance, LMTD and overall heat transfer coefficient also determined.
The Reynolds number at the shell and tube heat exchanger was identified. From the results, it
can be concluded that the pressure drop is depends on cold water flow rate not the
temperature. The pressure drop for shell side is increase as the flow rate increase but constant
at tube side because the flow rate is constant at 10 LPM. Furthermore, for shell and tube heat
transfer coefficient is depends on flow rate, which is for tube coefficient is constant ecause
the flow rate is constant but for shell coefficient, the shell coefficient is increase as the flow
rate is increase. Next, Heat transfer and heat loss, heat transfer coefficient, overall heat
transfer coefficient and the pressure drop are depend on the changes of the flow rates of the
stream. The lower the pressure drop of the shell and tube heat exchanger, the higher the
efficiency of the heat exchanger.
RECOMMENDATION
As recommendation, firstly make sure the system is fully drain after each use of water
on tube side and steam condensate on shell side in order to avoid corrosion build-up during
down-times. Next, the eye position should be perpendicular to the meniscus and the scale to
prevent from parallax error. Beside that, the water to the tube side should be the first and last
flow rate to be turned on. The steam should be turned on only after the water is flowing
through the tube side. Avoid any leakage of the instrument, the instrument should be working
properly and lastly make sure that the time taken to collect the data is punctually followed.
REFFERENCES
1. Equipment for Engineering Education, Instruction and Operation Manuals, Gunt
Hamburg Germany,02/98
2. Cengel, Y. A., and Turner, R. H. 2005. Fundamentals of Thermal-Fluid Sciences,
2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill.
3. YunusA.Cengel, 2006, Heat and Mass Transfer: A Practical Approach. McGraw Hill,,
3rd Edition
4. Christie John Geankoplis, Transport Process AND Separation (includes unit
operations) , 4thEdition
APPENDIX
Figure 8 : Tube side heat transfer factors
Figure 9 : Shell side heat transfer factors, segmental baffles