sfia - e-cf comparison & mapping report v1.0...sfia – e-cf comparison & mapping review ian seward,...

24
SFIA – e-CF Comparison & Mapping Review Ian Seward, [email protected] Page 1 of 24 SFIA – e-CF Comparison & Mapping Review Ian Seward Visual Management Ltd May 2016 Version V1.0 This document reports on an exercise to map the SFIA and e-CF frameworks to establish similarities and differences and to explore future collaboration and the benefits of a possible merging of the two frameworks. It is intended as input to future mapping and merging discussions. This document has an associated set of mapping matrices, published separately.

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page1of24

    SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReviewIanSeward

    VisualManagementLtdMay2016

    VersionV1.0

    ThisdocumentreportsonanexercisetomaptheSFIAande-CFframeworkstoestablishsimilaritiesanddifferencesandtoexplorefuturecollaborationandthebenefitsofapossiblemergingofthetwoframeworks.

    Itisintendedasinputtofuturemappingandmergingdiscussions.

    Thisdocumenthasanassociatedsetofmappingmatrices,publishedseparately.

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page2of24

    ExecutiveSummaryThisreportdescribesthefindingsofastudytocompareandmapthetwoframeworksSFIA(SkillsFrameworkfortheInformationage)ande-CF(EuropeanCompetencyFrameworkandtoconsiderbringingthetwoframeworksclosertogether.

    Bothframeworkshavethesameaim–toprovideameansofcharacterisingtheskillsandcompetenciesnecessaryforroleswithinIT.BothframeworksareavailableinseverallanguageswithSFIAincluding3non-Europeanlanguages.

    SFIAhasestablishedaglobaluser-baseinalmost200countriesandismanagedbytheSFIAFoundationonbehalfofitsusers.Itisupdatedbyopenconsultationwiththeusersandisfreeofchargefornon-commercial,internaluse.ToolssupportisavailablefromseveralAccreditedPartners.SFIAwasfirstpublishedin2000.

    e-CFhasestablishedarelativelysmalluser-basewithintheEUthroughsuccessfulpilotprojects.IthasbeenacceptedasaEuropeanStandardandisbeingpromotedforadoptionthroughoutEurope.Itisfreeofchargeandissupportedbyanonlinetool.E-CFwasfirstpublishedin2005.

    Thiscomparisonandmappinghasfocussedonthemoredifficulttaskof‘equivalence’–comparisonforalignmentofserviceofferingsisrelativelystraightforwardasrigourisnotrequired.Themainpointsareasfollows:

    § ThecoverageofITskillsinSFIAiswiderthanine-CF.

    § Thelevelswithintheframeworksdonotalignone-to-oneandthereisoverlap.

    § Somee-CFcompetenciesencompassmorethanoneSFIASkill.

    § Thereisrarelyaone-to-onemappingofskillsandcompetenciesandsoinformationisdistributedthroughouttheframeworksmakingaclearcomparisonverydifficult.

    § Bothframeworksneedtobeinterpretedforuse.

    § Whilethereappearstobemoredetailine-CFbecauseoftheskillandknowledgecomponentsthisisnotthecaseandthesestatementsrequiregreatinterpretation.

    § Bothframeworkshaveattributesoutsideoftheskillsorcompetencydescriptions;theGenericResponsibilitiesinSFIAandtheAnnexTableattributesofe-CF,althoughtheimportanceofthislattertableisunclear.

    § Bothframeworkscouldpresenttheinformationinamoreuseablemanner.

    § Thereisan‘ecosystem’surroundingSFIAwhichhasyettobeestablishedfore-CF.

    AcomparisonsummaryofsomeoftheareasneededtobeconsideredisprovidedinAppendixAalongwithareferencetothecomparisonmappingdocumentwhichprovidesdetailattheindividualskillsandcompetenciesineachframework.

    Thereisnoreasonwhythetwoframeworksshouldnotco-existbutclearlythereisabenefittobringingthetwoframeworksclosertogetherandpossiblyevenmergingintoone.Thisappearstoberelativelystraightforwardfromatechnicalpointofviewasthereissomuchsimilarityinthetwoframeworkshoweverissuesofownership,migrationforkeyusersandissuesrelatingtoanumberofunderlyingprincipleswouldneedtoberesolved.

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page3of24

    TableofContents1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................41.1 Background..........................................................................................................................................................41.2 OutputfromthisReview................................................................................................................................41.3 ConductoftheReviewandMapping.........................................................................................................41.4 SkillsandCompetencyFrameworksReviewed....................................................................................4

    2 BackgroundtoCollaboration...............................................................................................5

    3 DescriptionoftheSkillsFrameworkLandscape...........................................................53.1 IntroductiontotheSkillsFrameworkLandscape...............................................................................53.2 SFIA..........................................................................................................................................................................63.3 e-CF..........................................................................................................................................................................6

    4 MethodforMapping................................................................................................................74.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................................74.2 ExistingMappings.............................................................................................................................................74.3 WhatmakesagoodMapping?......................................................................................................................8

    5 ComparativeDescriptionofthetwoFrameworks........................................................95.1 IntroductionandHigh-LevelSimilarities................................................................................................95.2 SFIA.......................................................................................................................................................................105.2.1 SFIAOverview.........................................................................................................................................105.2.2 SFIAGenericResponsibilities...........................................................................................................115.2.3 SFIAStructure..........................................................................................................................................11

    5.3 E-CF.......................................................................................................................................................................125.3.1 e-CFOverview..........................................................................................................................................125.3.2 AlignmentwiththeEQF......................................................................................................................125.3.3 E-CFStructure..........................................................................................................................................13

    5.4 EaseofUse.........................................................................................................................................................136 DetailedMappingofSFIAande-CF..................................................................................146.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................146.2 Style......................................................................................................................................................................156.3 UnderlyingConcepts.....................................................................................................................................156.3.1 SFIA..............................................................................................................................................................156.3.2 e-CF...............................................................................................................................................................15

    6.4 Levels...................................................................................................................................................................166.4.1 Overview....................................................................................................................................................166.4.2 SFIA..............................................................................................................................................................176.4.3 e-CF...............................................................................................................................................................17

    6.5 SkillsandCompetences................................................................................................................................186.5.1 Overview....................................................................................................................................................18

    6.6 ApproachandUse...........................................................................................................................................197 Collaboration–TowardsasingleITSkillsFramework............................................197.1 Introduction-BringingSFIAande-CF‘closertogether’................................................................197.2 Considerationsforthetwoframeworksoperatingindependently..........................................197.3 ConsiderationsinSFIAande-CFmoving‘closertogether’...........................................................20

    8 PossibleOutlineCollaborationProject..........................................................................228.1 Overview.............................................................................................................................................................228.2 PhasedapproachtoCollaboration..........................................................................................................23

    AppendixA......................................................................................................................................24

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page4of24

    1 Introduction1.1 BackgroundBCS,TheCharteredInstituteforIT,commissionedthisreporttobeacomparisonreviewofbothSFIAande-CFforinputintoaproposedmappingworkshop.Itprovidesareviewofthecurrentskillsandcompetencylandscape,acomparisonoftheSFIAande-CFFrameworksandamappingbetweenthetwo.

    1.2 OutputfromthisReviewThedeliverablesfromthisrevieware:

    § Thisreportdetailingthecomparisonoftheframeworksandamappingofbothframeworks

    § Apresentationoffindingsofthisreviewfortheproposedmappingworkshop

    Note: Whilethemappingmatricescouldbeconsidereda‘stand-alone’document,itdoesnothavealltheconsiderationsbehinditandsothemappingmatricesshouldberead,andindeedused,inconjunctionwiththisreportasawhole.

    1.3 ConductoftheReviewandMappingThisworkwasfundedbyBCS,TheCharteredInstituteforITandconductedprimarilybyIanSeward,anindependentconsultant;heisanexperiencedSFIAAccreditedConsultantandthegeneralmanageroftheSFIAFoundation.

    Thismappingexercisewascarriedoutasa‘deskstudy’ofthetwoframeworksusingsomeexistingmappingsasinput,andwithinputandreviewfromexperiencedskillsandcompetencyexpertpractitionersfromtheglobalSFIAcommunity.

    1.4 SkillsandCompetencyFrameworksReviewedThefollowingskillsandcompetencyframeworks(andspecificdocuments)werereviewed:

    § SFIA–TheSkillsFrameworkfortheInformationAge

    o SFIAV6–TheCompleteReferenceGuideo SFIAV5–inpart

    § Europeane-CompetenceFrameworkV3.0

    o Europeane-CompetenceFramework–CWA16234:2014Part1o UserGuidefortheapplicationofthee-CF3.0–CWA16234:2014Part2o Buildingthee-CF–Methodologydocumentation–CWA16234:2014Part3o CaseStudiesfortheApplicationofthee-CF3.0–CWA16234:2014Part4o TheEuropeanQualificationsFrameworkEQF

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page5of24

    2 BackgroundtoCollaborationDuringarecente-CF/SFIACollaborationworkshop(March2016)anumberoftopicswerediscussed:

    § e-CFexpressedthatthecostoftheupdateprocesswasconsiderableandwantedtoknowhowSFIAmanagedthis

    § feesandsustainability

    § growingauserbase

    Itwasdecidedthatthepossibilityofcollaborationshouldbeconsideredand,asafirststage,amappingofthetwoframeworksshouldbeundertakenpossiblytoframefurthercollaborationactivities.

    3 DescriptionoftheSkillsFrameworkLandscape3.1 IntroductiontotheSkillsFrameworkLandscapeAnumberofskillsandcompetencyframeworksforIThavebeendeveloped.SFIA,TheSkillsFrameworkfortheInformationAgeande-CFappeartobethetwoleadersinthisareaatpresent.WhileSFIAande-CFareconsideredasthetwoleadersforthepurposesofthisstudy,otherframeworksdoexist.TheJapanesehavecreatedtheiCDSkillsFramework.ThisisverywellregardedinJapanbuthaslittleornoreachoutsideofJapanandthoseJapanesecompaniesusingiCDcontinuallyask‘howiCDrelatestoSFIA’,ineffectvalidatingitintheglobalcommunity.

    SFIAhasestablisheditselfasthedefactoglobalITSkillsandCompetencyFramework;ithasglobalreachwithusersinalmost200countries.WhileSFIAhasbeenactivelyusedfor16years,morerecently,anumberofotherframeworkshavebeendeveloped.Whiletheseframeworkshavedifferentstructures,style,andunderlyingprinciples,ifoneputsasideanycommercialorpoliticalinterests,theyshareacommonintent–tohelptoenhancetheskillsandcompetencyofthoseworkingIT(orinsomecasesasubsetofIT).

    Whiletheglobalreachanduser-baseofanyframeworkotherthanSFIAisnegligible,insharingthatcommonaim,itmakessensetolookatpossibilitiesforcollaboration.

    Thishasalsobeendrivenbyorganisationsthatarelookingtouseaskillsorcompetencyframeworkwantingtoknowhowsuchaframework‘mapstoSFIA’;ineffecthavingamappingagainstSFIA,validatestheseotherframeworksagainstthedefactoglobalITSkillsandCompetencyFramework.

    Note: Thereisnoparticularreasonwhymorethanoneskillsandcompetencyframeworkshouldnotco-existbutlogicdoessuggestthatunderstandingthedifferencesamongtheframeworksandconsideringworkingtowardsonemakessense.

    ItisprobablytruetosaythattheSFIAFrameworkhasbeenasignificantinputintomostoftheskillsframeworksdevelopedorunderdevelopment.

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page6of24

    3.2 SFIASFIA,TheSkillsFrameworkfortheInformationAgewasfirstpublishedin2000:thiswasasaresultofacollaborationbyanumberoforganisationsthathadbeenusing,orworkingwith,severaldifferentUKcompetencyframeworks;anexamplewouldbetheBCS’IndustryStructureModelfromthelate1980s/1990.TheSFIAFoundationwasestablishedasanot-for-profitorganisationtodevelop,maintainandpromotetheframeworkforthebenefitoftheITindustryandITprofessionalsintheUK.

    Asanot-for-profitorganisation,theFoundationhasneveractivelypromotedtheframeworkeitherwithintheUKorglobally;theframeworkhassimplybeenmadeavailabletothosewhowanttouseit.ThevastmajorityofusersmakeuseofSFIAfreeofchargewithonlyamodestchargebeingmadeforcommercialexploitation(sellingSFIAconsultancyandtools).

    Regardlessof‘legalownership’–SFIAis‘owned’bytheglobalITIndustryusercommunity,itisupdatedthroughopenconsultationwithitsusers;itisusedbyindustrybecauseofitsusefulness,keptrelevant,andtherearenobarrierstoitsuse.Itisnotenforcedormandatedbyanybody.

    Since2000,thousandsoforganisationshavemadeuseoftheSFIAFramework,manyhavepresentedatthevariousSFIAconferences,mostrecentlyinAustraliawithnearly20casestudypresentations.ManyorganisationshaveembeddedSFIAdeeplyintotheirskillsmanagementactivitiesanddonotseparatelyrecogniseSFIAfromwhattheydo.

    SFIAisthebasisofanumberoflargeprogrammes:AustralianPublicSectorITjobrolesaredefinedusingSFIAskills;theBCSCharteredstatus,membership,careerpathsandprofessionaldevelopmentschemeisunderpinnedbySFIA.

    AnumberoftoolprovidersprovidesupportfortheSFIAframeworkandnumerousorganisationshavebuilttheirowninternaltooling.

    SFIAisavailablein6languageswithtwomoreunderdiscussion

    3.3 e-CFDevelopmentoftheEuropeanCompetencyFramework(e-CF)projectwasinitiatedin2005encouragedbytheEuropeanCommission.Followinginput,andhigh-levelinvolvement,fromEuropeanICTsectorexpertsandstakeholders,theframework’sfirstversionwaspublishedin2008.By2010,andwithexperienceandapplicationfeedback,version2wasthenpublished:aframeworkwithgreaterdepth,updateduserguide,newmethodologydocumentationandanonlinetoolwithuser-specificprofilebuildingcapabilities.

    Thee-CFwasoriginallyestablishedinordertoofferacompetencytoolwithunderlyingknowledgeforEuropeanICTprofessionals.Beingstructuredwith4Dimensions,theframeworkincludesorganisationalperspectives(inDimensions1and2)togetherwithDimension3to‘bridgeindividualandorganisationalcompetences’.RapidchangeswithintheICTenvironment,ensuresthate-CF,being‘durable’,undergoesmaintenanceeverythreeyears;thecurrentVersion3waspublishedin2014.

    Throughoutitslife,e-CFhasbeentrialledinanumberofpilotprojects,approximately40,andthee-CFprojectisnowfundingthemarketingandpromotionbothinsideandoutsideofEuropetogainuptakebeyondthesepilotprojects.

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page7of24

    Atpresentthee-CFprojectisnot-for-profit,howeveronceEUfundingceasesthenthefundingmodelandownershipisunclear.

    e-CFhasdevelopedaprofilingtooltosupportthee-CFframework.

    e-CFisavailablein4Europeanlanguagespresently.

    4 MethodforMapping4.1 IntroductionThismappinghasbeencarriedoutby‘deskstudy’andasurveyofskillsandcompetency(SFIA)experts,whohavemanyyears’hands-onexperienceofenhancingITskillswithinuserorganisationsand,specifically,theuseofSFIA.Additionally,thereareinputsfromanumberoforganisationsthathaveundertakenmappingsto‘somedegree’.

    Note: TheinputtothismappinghaslargelycomefromtheSFIAcommunity.Thisisbecausethereisaverymuchgreaterusercommunitythane-CF,aglobalreachandmanymoreyearsofimplementationpractice.

    Thesectionbelowdescribescurrentmappingsmadeavailabletothisstudyandgivesanoverviewofsomeoftheissuesthattheydonotcoveradequately:thismappingexercisewilltrytotakethesemappingsfurtherandbegintoaddresssomeofthoseissues.Ithashowever,becomeapparentjusthowcomplexthismappingexercisereallyisandso,whilethismappingtakesthingsfurtherandidentifiessomeoftheissues,itprobablydoesnotaddressallissuescompletely.

    Whenchoosingamapping–or,indeed,embarkingonamapping–onemustconsiderthepurposethemappingwillbeputto,itislikelythatwithadifferentobjectiveonemappingmightbedifferenttoanother.Somepossibleusesarelistedbelow:

    § Validatingorjustifyingoneframeworkagainstanother

    § Enablingeitherframeworktobeusedforcomparisonagainstamodelofcompetencee.g.forindividualcertificationwhereanytoleranceiscritical.

    § Internaluseinmanaginganddevelopingskillsandcompetenciesandonlyneedingasuperficialawarenessofotherframeworks–i.e.thetolerancesareinterestingratherthancritical.

    Mappingforequivalence,forexamplecertification,isverydifferenttomappingfortheprovisionoftrainingorsubjectqualification.

    Oneadditionalissuetobeconsideredisthatoflanguageandtranslation:SFIAisfirstproducedinEnglishthentranslatedinto6languages(with2morescheduled);e-CF’sprofilingtoolisavailablein4Europeanlanguages(notsureoftheproductionprocesstoidentifytheoriginallanguageofe-CFbutmaintenanceupdatesincludewordschangesinordertoclarifymeanings).Itispossiblethatsomemisinterpretationsmayhavebeenintroducedintranslationsandthismappinghasnottakenthisintoaccount.

    4.2 ExistingMappingsAnumberofmappingshavebeenproducedandthosemadeavailabletothisexercisehavebeenconsideredinthisreport.Noneisidentifiednorcritiquedspecificallyasthe

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page8of24

    circumstancesofthosemappingsarenotknown.Itisfairtosaythatanumberofthosemappingshavebeenmostly‘aninitialcursoryglance’andtakearathersimplisticview.

    Whilstauseful‘firstlook’–and,nodoubt,usefulforthepurposethattheywereintended–thesemappingshaveratheroversimplifiedthesituationand,typically,notexploredbeyondthenameoftheskillorcompetenceinoneframeworktothenameoftheskillorcompetenceintheother,inordertoestablish‘equivalence’.

    Firstly,thedescriptionbelowthenamehasoftennotbeenconsideredandthe‘mapper’hasusedtheirsubjectiveviewofwhattheyunderstandtheskilltobeandconcludedthatsinceitiscalledthesame,orprettymuchso,andthedescriptionmatchestosomedegree,thentheskillsorcompetenceequate:thedetailbelowthedescription,therefore,hasalmostcertainlynotbeenfullyconsidered.

    Secondly,thecurrentmappingsmadeavailabletothisstudy,makeareasonablehigh-levelmappingofthelevels(SFIA1-7ande-CF1-5)effectivelybysaying1=1and7=5andthendistributingthelevelssomehowinbetween:againthisisusefultosomedegreebutlackstherigourofdetailedcomparisonandcanbequitemisleading.

    Andthirdly,theunderlyingconceptsandprincipleshavenotgenerallybeenconsideredaspartofmappingexercises.

    4.3 WhatmakesagoodMapping?Agoodmappingisonethatfairlyrepresents:

    § Howtheframeworksarerelated

    § Determinesequivalence–essentialforcertificationorrigorouscomparison

    § Adequatelydescribesandcomparestheunderlyingconcepts

    § Identifiesequivalences,omissionsorgaps

    § Considerstolerances

    § Identifiesissuesforusers

    § Enablesconsideredselection

    § Allowsadeterminationunderoneframeworktobeequatedtoadeterminationintheotherframework

    Itislikelythatthereisalotofpersonalopinioninanymappingand,althoughundesirable,itdoesreflectthesubjectivenatureofsuchanexercise;whilethisistobeminimised,itprobablycannotberemovedaltogether.

    Anexampleofthisis‘tolerance’.Bothmodelsarediscretescalesofcompetenceoneof5levelsandoneof7levels–half-levelsmakenosenseatall.Itisoftendifficulttodetermineifsomeoneisatoneleveloranothereveninoneframework,butwherealevelinoneframeworkbridgestwolevelsintheotherframeworkthisaddscomplicationandintroducesmore‘error’–putsimplythereisprobablyanerrorofoneframeworklevelinanymappingandthisisverysignificantwherethenumberoflevelsisasfewas5.

    Thisexerciseisintendedtoformthebasisofaworkshoptoreviewmappingsanddecidewhatmappingcouldbetakenforwardasthe‘agreed-mapping’.Itisalsointendedtoinformfuturediscussionsoncollaborationandanypossiblemergingofthetwoframeworks.For

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page9of24

    thisreason,themappingisintendedtobefairbutalsotonotignoreissueswhichneedtoberesolvedifsuchamappingistobeusedfordirectcomparison,contractualpurposesorcertificationofanyrigour.

    5 ComparativeDescriptionofthetwoFrameworks5.1 IntroductionandHigh-LevelSimilaritiesBothe-CFandSFIAaimtodothesamething–provideameansofcharacterisingtheskillsandcompetenciesnecessaryforroleswithinIT.Bothframeworks,ofcourse,usesimilarterms,sometimesforthesamethingandsometimesforadifferentaspect–thishasthepotentialtocauseconfusion,asitleadstoassumptions.

    AcomparisonsummaryofsomeoftheareasneededtobeconsideredisprovidedinAppendixAalongwithareferencetothecomparisonmappingdocumentwhichprovidesdetailattheindividualskillsandcompetenciesineachframework.

    Bothframeworksaremodelsofskillsorcompetenciesagainstalevelofcompetenceorproficiency.Notallskillsorcompetenciescanbepractisedatalllevels,forinstance,astrategicITskillisnotpractisedatSFIALevel1ore-CFLevel1.

    Bothframeworksdescribeattributesthatareadditionaltotheskillorcompetencyatlevelbutnecessarytounderpinthatskillatlevel.Theframeworkseachhaveaconsistentstructurethatenableseasynavigation.

    Forthepurposesofthisreview,acomparisonofthestructureofeachframeworkisprovidedbelowwithdetaileddescriptionofthestructureinsubsequentsections.

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page10of24

    MappedStructureoftheFrameworks

    5.2 SFIA

    5.2.1 SFIAOverview

    SFIAhasidentified97ITskills(ProfessionalSkills)and7levelsofcompetence.Whilethenumberofskillshasvariedalittleoverthereleases,thenumberoflevels,7,hasnot.Notallskillscanbepractisedatalllevels,forinstance,astrategicITskillisnotpractisedatSFIALevel1.AkeycomponentoftheSFIAFrameworkistheconceptofdemonstratedexperienceofaprofessionalskillandgenericresponsibilities.

    SFIAdescribesProfessionalSkillsatlevelsofcompetence.Whilerecognisingtheimportanceofotherattributes,SFIAdoesnotmakeanattempttodefinethese.

    § ProfessionalSkillsSFIAdefinesprofessionalskills

    SFIA Comment

    Category/sub3category e3CF5Area Dimension51

    A5convenience5for5organising5the5skills5and5competencies.SFIA5has5an5'area5of5work'5view5and5e3CF5has5a5'lifecycle5view'.Both5have5more5of5a5business5change5than5an5engineering5flavour.

    Skill Competence The5Skills5or5Competencies5in5the5framework:5for5example:Project5Management5(SFIA)5&5Project5Management5(e3CF)

    Skill5Description (Competence)5Description

    A5description5of5the5Skill5(SFIA)5or5Competency5(e3CF)These5are5generally5similar5although5style5varies5between5the5frameworks.

    Level Proficiency5Level

    The5competence5or5proficiency5scaleSFIA:575levels.e3CF:555levels.

    Proficiency5at5Level

    A5description5of5the5Skill5(SFIA)5or5Competency5(e3CF)5at5each5Level.55Both5describe5actions5performed5for5the5skill5or5competence5at5increasing5levels5of5proficiecy5or5competence.

    Skill5Area

    These5are5additional5statements5of5actions5for5an5e3CF5Competence.SFIA:5These5statements5are5usually5included5in5the5Skills5Description5and/or5the5Skill5at5Level.e3CF:5Additional5skills5statements5apply5to5all5levels.

    Knowledge5Area

    SFIA:5deliberately5does5not5define5knowledge5areas5for5the5skills.55It5does,5however,5imply5knowledge5of5appropriate5technologies5and,5more5specifically,5non3technical5aspects5within5the5levels.e3CF:5identifies5a5mix5of5technical5and5non3technical5knowledge.

    Generic5ResponsibilityAttributes

    SFIA:5This5is5key535a5generic5description5of5attributes5for5any5level.e3CF:5Not5explicitly5defined5other5than5in5the5description5of5alignment5with5the5EQF5but5Business5Skills5and5Influence5are5not5explicitly5covered5and5some5descriptions5span5levels.

    Dimension53

    Skill5at5Level

    Dimension4

    e3CF

    Dimension52

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page11of24

    § BehaviouralSkillsSFIAdoesnotdefinebehaviouralskillsasmanyorganisationshavetheirowninternalbehavioursandvaluesdefined.Anorganisation’sinternalbehavioursandvaluescangenerallybealignedtotheSFIAGenericResponsibilities.

    § KnowledgeSFIArecognisestheimportanceofknowledgebutdoesnotdefinerequirements.Technologies,standards,andlegislationchangesfrequentlyandorganisationrequirementsvary–SFIAdoesnotdefineknowledgerequirements.

    § ExperienceSFIArecognisesexperiencethroughdemonstratedpracticeoftheprofessionalskillatlevel.Itdoesnotplaceparticularrequirementsonyearsoranyotherparticulardescriptionofexperience.

    § QualificationsSFIArecognisesthepartqualificationsplaybutdoesnotdefinerequirements.Qualificationschangeasnewofferingsareavailableand,ingeneral,qualificationdoesnotequatetodemonstratedexperienceofcompetence–SFIAdoesnotdefinequalificationrequirements.

    WhileseveralorganisationshaveextendedSFIAtoaddresstheaboveareas,atleastinpart,SFIAhasleftthistoSFIAusersratherthanmakedefinitionsinthisarea.

    5.2.2 SFIAGenericResponsibilities

    ThelevelsofresponsibilityandaccountabilityusedinSFIA(the7levels)aredescribedingenerictermsandtheindividualskillatleveldescriptionsaredefinedtobeconsistentwiththesegenericlevels.TheSFIAGenericResponsibilitiesare:

    § Autonomy

    § Influence

    § Complexity

    § BusinessSkills

    Simply,athigherlevelsofcompetenceonewouldbeexpectedtohavegreaterautonomy,greaterinfluence,beabletohandlegreatercomplexity,andhaveabetterunderstandingandconsiderationofbusinessskills.

    5.2.3 SFIAStructure

    SFIASkills(professionalskills)arearrangedintoCategoriesandSub-Categoriesthesearejustlogicalcollectionsandtoaidnavigation.Thecategoriesdonotrelatetoanyparticularlifecycleorstandardalthoughifoneisworkinginaparticularareathenitislikelythatonewillhaveskillsmostlyfromthatarea,DeliveryandOperation,forinstance.

    SFIACategoriesare:

    § StrategyandArchitecture

    § ChangeandTransformation

    § DevelopmentandImplementation

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page12of24

    § DeliveryandOperations

    § Skills&Quality

    § RelationshipsandEngagement

    ThroughouttheSFIAReferenceGuide,Skillsarestructuredconsistentlyasfollows:

    § SkillNameAnameusedforreference.

    § SkillCodeAuniquesimplecode.

    § OverallDescriptionAbroaddefinitionoftheskill.

    § LevelDescriptionsAdefinitionoftheskillateachofthe7levels.Thephrasingfacilitatestheiruseasprofessionalcompetencies.Ingeneralthesearesingleparagraphs,ofafewsentences,describingwhatisshouldbedemonstratedatthatlevelforthatskill.

    5.3 E-CF

    5.3.1 e-CFOverview

    e-CFhasidentified40ITCompetenciesand5Levels.The5levelsaremappedtotheEuropeanQualificationFramework(EQF)levels3-8.Notallcompetenciesaredescribedatalllevels.Thee-CFintroduces‘Dimensions’asameansofstructuringtheinformationinaconsistentway:Dimension1,forinstance,providesagroupingthatwouldberecognisedwithalifecycleviewasPlan,Build,Run,supportedbyEnableandcontrolledbyManage.

    5.3.2 AlignmentwiththeEQF

    Whilstnotdescribedassuch,thereiscategorisingine-CFthatcouldbeseenassimilartothegenericsfromSFIA,notablythetableattheendaligningthee-CFLevelstotheEQFLevels.

    Thelevelsofresponsibilityandaccountability(the7levelsinSFIA)aredescribedingenerictermsandtheindividualskillatleveldescriptionsaredefinedtobeconsistentwiththesegenericlevels.Thee-CFGenericResponsibilitiesare:

    § LevelDescription

    § TypicalTasks

    § Complexity

    § Autonomy

    § Behaviour

    Athigherlevelsofproficiency,onewouldbeexpectedtohavegreaterautonomyandhandlegreatercomplexity:thereisnoexplicitlinkingtothebusinessandtheintroductionofBehaviour.

    Itisunclearwhethertheseattributesactuallyformapartofthee-CForwhethertheyhavebeenincludedmerelyforadditionalexplanationoftheframework.

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page13of24

    OneaspectofthiswhichisparticularlyusefulistheanecdotaldescriptionofLevelsto‘exampleposition’suchas‘SeniorProfessional/Manager’.

    5.3.3 E-CFStructure

    Thestructureofthee-CFisconsistent:essentiallythecompetencies(Dimension2)aredistributedthroughoutthee-CFareas(Dimension1).Eachcompetenceisdescribedatupto5levelsofproficiency(Dimension3)andupto14knowledgestatementsand11skillsstatements(Dimension4):

    § e-CFArea–Dimension1Thereare5e-CFareaswhicharegroupings:

    o A.Plano B.Buildo C.Runo D.Enableo E.Manage

    § e-CFCompetence–Dimension2The40e-CFCompetenciesaredistributedthroughoutthe5e-CFareas.EachcompetencehasaNameandanoverallDescription.

    § e-CFProficiencyLevel–Dimension3Eachofthecompetencieshasupto5proficiencylevels,withnotallcompetencieshavinganentryateachlevel.

    § e-CFSkillsandKnowledge–Dimension4EachcompetencycanalsohaveanumberofSkilldescriptorsandKnowledgeDescriptors.Thesemaybeasinglesentenceorjustacoupleofwordse.g.’marketneeds’foraknowledgeor‘thinkoutofthebox’foraskill.Theseadditionalstatementsapplytothecompetenceatalllevels.

    Note: Althoughe-CFusestheterm‘Dimension’,itis,nonetheless,a2-dimensionalmodelof40competenciesby5levels.Thestatementsforknowledgeandskillsareuniquetothecompetencetheyareassociatedwithandareadditionalinformationtodescribethecompetence.

    5.4 EaseofUseAnyusernewtoskillsandcompetencyframeworksmayconsiderbothframeworkscomplex:thereare97skillsat7levelsinSFIA(thegenericresponsibilitiesareoftenforgotten);thereare40competenciesat5levelswithupto14knowledgestatementsand11skillsstatementsine-CF(andthesignificanceofthealignmenttotheEQFcouldbeoverlooked).

    Inreality,ifyouarefamiliarwithoneframeworkthen,withagoodamountofreading,theotherframeworkisquiteunderstandable.

    Bothframeworkscanbeobtainedbydownloadingthedocumentationfromtherespectivewebsite.SFIAisavailableasonedocumentande-CF,whileavailableasonedocument,hastwosupportingdocumentsandalsoadescriptionoftheEQF.Inadditiontotheframework,thee-CFdocumentationdescribesmoreabouthowtheframeworkwasdevelopedandthevariousorganisationsthatwereinvolvedintheworkinggroupstodefinethemodel:thisis

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page14of24

    likelytobeindicativeofthefundingthatthee-CFprojecthasreceivedandtheneedtogenerategoodqualitydocumentationforsuchaproject;SFIA,lackingsimilarfunding,hasnotproducedthistypeofdocumentation.Additionally,theSFIAFoundationhasconcentratedontheFrameworkandnotinsuggestingitsusetoindustry;theseaspectsarediscussedthroughouttheglobalusercommunityandthroughvariouspapersfromindividualSFIAusers.

    The‘SFIAWallChart’isasimpleA3documentand,onceoneisfamiliarwiththeframework,thisprovidesgreatinitialnavigationwithsubsequentreferencetotheReferenceModelfordetail(e-CFshouldpublishsomethingsimilar).

    Thesinglecompetenceperpagenatureofthee-CFdocumentisparticularlyclear.

    Note: ThevarioususesofSFIA(andhowitisappliedforthoseuses)areonlybrieflytouchedonwithinSFIAdocumentation.

    6 DetailedMappingofSFIAande-CF6.1 IntroductionWhilebothframeworkshavethesameaimtheyhavedifferentstructures,terminology,underlyingconceptsandpresentation.Thissectiondescribesthemappingindetail.Itispresentedinthreeparts:

    § Style

    § Underlyingconcepts

    § Levels

    § Skills/Competencies

    § ApproachandUse

    IndeterminingwhetheraSFIASkillsisadequatelyaddressedbyane-CFCompetence(andviceversa)thefollowingcomponentsneedtobeconsideredasawhole:

    § SFIA

    o GenericResponsibilitiesforaLevelo SkillDescriptiono SkillLevelDescription

    § e-CF

    o e-CFandEQFLevelTableo CompetenceDescriptiono e-CFProficiencyLeveldescriptiono CompetenceSkillAreaso CompetenceKnowledgeAreas

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page15of24

    6.2 StyleIngeneral,printedmatterisbetterpresentedine-CF.Thisprobablyreflectsthemoreadequatelyfundednatureofthatprojectandtheneedfore-CFtodescribehowthe‘project’hasrunbothfortheEuropeanCommissionandalsotoencourageauser-base.SFIAdocumentation,whileimproving,isnotyetaspolishedasitshouldbe.

    SFIA,however,seemstobemoreconsolidated.Inasingledocumentthereisadescriptionofunderlyingconcepts,ideasforuseandthewholeoftheFramework.TheinformationinSFIAismorereadableincontext,thisisparticularlytrueinthecomparisonwiththee-CF‘Dimension4’attributes,whichareoftenjustafewwordsandnotofaconsistentlevel.

    Whileorganisedindifferentways,theamountoftextdescribingaSFIASkillsataLevelismuchthesameasthatforane-CFCompetenceatLevel.

    6.3 UnderlyingConceptsWhilebothframeworkshavethesameaimtheyhavedifferentstructures,andterminology,anddifferencestosomeunderlyingconcepts.

    6.3.1 SFIA

    TheSFIAFrameworkisfoundedonthebeliefthatdemonstratedexperienceisessentialindeterminingwhetheraskillorcompetenceispresent.Itdoesnotdefineanyparticularlengthofservice,qualification,knowledgeorlevelofknowledge.Itisrecognisedthatqualificationscanbevaluableandknowledgeisessentialbutitdoesnotseektodefineordescribetheseindetail.

    Tobeabletoperformaskillataparticularlevelitisexpectedthatonecanperformtheskillatthelevelbelowandsoon.(Thisissomethingcurrentlybeingdebated.)

    Thenatureoftheskillschangeasonemovesupthelevels,inparticular,theoperationalcompetenceofaskillatLevel6maybegreaterthantheoperationalcompetenceoftheskillatLevel7–thisisoneaspectofthedebatementionedinthepreviousparagraph.

    Toperformaroleonewilllikelyrequiremorethanoneskill,possiblyatdifferentlevels.

    TheGenericLevelsofResponsibilityareanessentialcomponentofSFIAandpitchesalevelofoperationonthebasisofAutonomy,Influence,ComplexityandBusinessSkills.

    Themodelmustberelevanttoindustry,andthatindustryisthebestqualifiedtoensureitsrelevanceandintegritygoingforward.SFIAisthereforeupdatedandvalidatedbyitsusersthroughtheusergroupandCouncilbyopenconsultation–theFrameworkitselfisnotdrivenbyanyparticularagenda.

    UseofSFIAisnot‘pushed’bytheFoundation,ratheritis‘pulled’byindustryandbusiness.

    6.3.2 e-CF

    e-CFisalsofoundedonthebeliefthatexperienceofthecompetencebeingperformedisessentialbuttheframeworkislinkedtotheEQFandrequiresincreasingknowledge,innovationandtechnicalcompetenceasonemovesupthelevels(thisincreasinglevelofknowledgeisnotnecessarilyareflectionofindustry).Thee-CFandEQFLeveltablewouldappeartobekeytoe-CFbutseemstobeplacedinanappendixtotheframework,sodoes

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page16of24

    notappeartohavethesamerelevancetotheframeworkasthegenericresponsibilitiesofSFIA,althoughthereismuchoverlapintheirintent.

    Theinclusionof‘Behaviour’intheAppendixtableisworthyoffurtherdevelopment;atpresentthestatementsarewrittenasadditionaltasks.

    The‘Influence’descriptionsintheAppendixtableareverylight(oneortwowords)andspanlevelsthatthenmakethemlessuseablefordetermininglevel.

    TheDimension4componentsofthecompetenciesappeartobelesswellformedthantheothercomponentsoftheframework.Superficially,thissuggestsmoredetailbut,infact,whenscrutinisedtheyarenotdescribedandareopentosignificantinterpretation,anditisnotclearwhatparttheywouldplayinusingtheframework.TheyareclearlytheretobolstertheCompetencyDescriptionsbutpotentiallywillbeignoredastheyaredifficulttointerpretcomparatively(‘thinkingoutsideofthebox’,‘security’,etc..).

    e-CFappearstobe‘pushed’byindustrybodies,certificationorganisations,andEUGovernment(illustratedbyitsadoptionasanEuropeanStandardanddiscussionsonpushingthisdownontoindustry);atpresentthereisnota‘pull’fromindustry.

    6.4 Levels

    6.4.1 Overview

    Bothframeworksdescribewhatthelevelisforeachskill.InthecaseofSFIA,thisisdonethroughamixoftheGenericResponsibilities,theSkillsDescriptionandtheLevelDescriptionfortheskill.Inthecaseofe-CF,thisisdonethroughamixoftheCompetenceDescription,thee-CFProficiencyDescription,theSkillStatementsandtheKnowledgeStatementsandatableofLevelsmappedtotheEQF.

    BothframeworksrecognisethattherearesomegenericattributesfortheLevelsbutthesearemoreexplicitlyidentifiedinSFIAandconsideredkey.Thetableinanappendixtothee-CFaddressestheSFIAGenericResponsibilitiestosomedegreebutitisunclearwhetherthisisgiventhesameimportanceasinSFIA.Theinclusionof‘Attitude’isparticularlyinterestingandcouldbehugelybeneficialtoaframework(SFIAcouldbenefitfromthis)butthedescriptionsofattitudearemoreadditionaltasksperformedratherthan‘professionalattitude’.

    ThetablebelowillustratesthealignmentofSFIALevelsande-CFLevels.Thisisdiscussedmorespecificallyinthesectionsbelow.

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page17of24

    MappedAlignmentofLevels

    6.4.2 SFIA

    TheSFIALevelshaveananecdotaldescriptorwhichisuseful,andthengenericdescriptionsofAutonomy,Influence,ComplexityandBusinessSkills:thesehavebeenrefinedovertheyearsbuthavenotbeensignificantlychangedastheyhaveservedindustryandbusinesswell.

    SFIAcouldprobablybenefitfromaddingsomethingliketheLeveldescriptorsandBehavioursofe-CFbutwouldhavetohavegenericBehaviourdescriptionsratherthancrossoverintothebehavioursandvaluesthatorganisationshaveevolvedthemselves.

    SFIAhas7levelsandsomeusersfeelthatthecurrentsituationdoesnothaveadequaterangebetweenLevel3andLevel6;whilethisisoutsidethescopeofthisreview,itillustratesthattherearestillquestionstobeansweredregardscurrentlevels.

    6.4.3 e-CF

    e-CFLevelshaveamoreexplicitdescriptorsimilartoroletitlee.g.Associate,thenaLeveldescriptionandgenericdescriptionsofTypicalTasks,Complexity,AutonomyandBehaviour.Behaviourismoreadescriptionofworkperformedratherthanbehaviour.Thereisnorecognitionofbusinessskillsandcomplexitydescriptionsspanmorethanonelevel,whichmakesitdifficulttouseasacomponentofdeterminingalevel.

    Aparticularlygoodaspectofthee-CFisthegenericLevelDescriptionpastthetitle.

    CommentSFIA+Levels

    Professional

    7Set+strategy,+

    Inspire,+Mobilise

    6 Initiate,+Influence

    LeadProfessional

    Principal

    Follow1

    4 Enable

    5

    3

    2

    Apply

    Assist

    Ensure,+Advise

    eGCF+2

    Associate

    eGCF+Levels

    SFIA+&+eGCF+Levels+overlap.SFIA:+Appears+to+start+at+a+lower+level+than+eGCF.eGCF+Level+1+could+be+SFIA+Level+1+or+2.SFIA+Level+1+is+eGCF+Level+1+or+lower+(?).

    SFIA+&+eGCF+Levels+overlap.eGCF+Level+5+is+really+Tech/Skill+LeadershipSFIA+Level+7+is+generally+above+eGCF+Level+5+organisationally.Clarify+skill+leadership+vs+org.+leadership+and+accountability

    SFIA+&+eGCF+Levels+overlap.eGCF+Level+5+could+be+SFIA+Level+6+(more+likely)+or+7+(weakly).SFIA+Level+6+is+either+eGCF+Level+4+or+5+(more+likely).

    SFIA+&+eGCF+Levels+overlap.eGCF+Level+4+could+be+SFIA+Level+5+(more+likely)+or+6+(weakly).SFIA+Level+5+is+either+eGCF+Level+3+or+4+(more+likely).

    SFIA+&+eGCF+Levels+overlap.eGCF+Level+3+could+be+SFIA+Level+4+or+5.SFIA+Level+4+is+eGCF+Level+3.

    SFIA+&+eGCF+Levels+overlap.eGCF+Level+2+could+be+SFIA+Level+2+or+3.SFIA+Level+3+is+eGCF+Level+2

    SFIA+&+eGCF+Levels+overlap.eGCF+Level+2+could+be+SFIA+Level+2+or+3.SFIA+Level+2+is+either+eGCF+Level+1+or+2.

    eGCF+1

    eGCF+3

    SeniorProfessional

    orManager

    eGCF+4

    eGCF+5

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page18of24

    Theequatingofthee-CFLevelstotheEQFLevelispowerfulinpromotingboththoseframeworksbutitmakesalinkthatisprobablynotareflectionofreality.EQFLevel8is‘knowledgeatthemostadvancedfrontier…’,e-CFLevel5isequatedtothisbutitdoesnotgenerallyreflectanindustryandbusinessview.

    6.5 SkillsandCompetences

    6.5.1 Overview

    Inconsideringthemappingofthetwoframeworks,refertotheMappingMatricespresentedinaseparateexceldocument.Thissectionprovidesasummaryanddiscussionofthemapping:

    Generallyane-CFCompetenceisequivalenttoaSFIASkillwiththeskilldescriptorverysimilar;theLevelDescriptorsaresimilartooalthoughSFIA’saremoredetailedandgivesomecontext.Thee-CFDimension4attributes(skills)addfurthercontenttoe-CFtobolstertheleveldescriptors(toequalSFIA)andinsomecaseaddspecificsnotpresentinSFIA.TheknowledgestatementsdonothaveanequivalentinSFIAalthoughthereisthepresumptionthat,inhavingtheskill,onehastheunderlyingknowledge.Specificknowledgestatementsine-CF,andalso,tosomeextent,theskillsstatementsdonotfitwellwiththedesigngoalofSFIAtobegenerictoanyITenvironmentandtheimportanceofthee-CFskillandknowledgestatementsarenotclear(whethermandatory,howmanyarerequiredandtowhatlevel).

    Thereare97SFIAskillsand40e-CFCompetencies.SFIAhasagreaterbreadththane-CF.However,itisnotquitesostraightforward,assomeoftheSFIAskillscouldbeconsideredsatisfiedbyonee-CFCompetency;forexample,the4SFIAQualityManagementskillsarecoveredbythesinglee-CFICTQualityManagementCompetencytosomedegree.WherethisisthecasethelevelofdescriptionismuchgreaterinSFIA(albeitspreadacrossthegreaternumberofskills).

    ThereareseveralSFIASkillsthatarenotaddressedbye-CFandsomeinstanceswhereaskillisonlyaddressedbecausee-CFusesasinglewordinthedescription.

    Withregardtoe-CF,mostCompetenciesappeartobecoveredbySFIA(sometimesbymorethanoneSFIASkill),threestandoutasnotbeingadequatelysatisfied.SFIAdoesnothavetheexplicitknowledgestatementsandavoidsbeingspecificwithregardstobothknowledgeandskills.

    The‘Dimension4’attributesofe-CFareusefulbutaregenerallyomittedfromSFIA.SomeoftheskillsfromDimension4arecoveredinthedescriptionsinthecoreskillsofSFIAoratLevelbutnotall.TheknowledgestatementsarenotaddressedinSFIAatall.WhenusingSFIAthereisanassumptionthattheunderlyingnecessaryknowledgeispresent–itisnotdefinedexplicitlybecauseknowledgeandqualificationrequirementsappeartochangerapidly,andoften,andalsoaredependentoncontextandnationalarea.

    Whilethe‘Dimension4’attributesofe-CFarepotentiallyusefultheyarenotsufficientlydefinedtobeusedtodeterminecompetency;theyarealsoalignedatalllevelsofaCompetenceandnotincreasingwithlevel;theyarenotallrequired,butsuggested,andarenotexhaustive.Asaresulttheycannotreallyformpartofanassessmentofcompetenceandcertainlycouldnotbeconsideredastandard.

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page19of24

    6.6 ApproachandUseBothframeworkscanbeinterpretedforaspecificinstanceandthereforedirectcomparisonisdependentontheintendeduse.Infactbothframeworksneedtobeinterpreted–forinstanceisaskillsatisfiedifanypartoftheskill,asdefinedintheframework,isnotsatisfied?Inthecaseofe-CFforinstance,howmuch‘thinkingoutsidethebox’isnecessaryforeachlevel?Inbothframeworkswhatunderlyingknowledgeisactuallyrequiredandhowisthisdetermined?

    7 Collaboration–TowardsasingleITSkillsFramework7.1 Introduction-BringingSFIAande-CF‘closertogether’Clearly,therearebenefitsinbringingthetwoframeworksclosertogether.BothFrameworkssharethesameissuesthatneedtobeaddressedandwhileSFIAhasbeendealingwiththeseissueswithminimalrevenueithasneverthelessmanagedtosupportaglobalnetworkofSFIAuse.Thee-CF,whilecurrentlyenjoyingsignificantEUfundingtogetestablished,willeventuallyexperiencethesesameissues,andonceithastobeself-funding(whenEUfundingceases)willfinditselfinthesamepositionasSFIA.UnlikeSFIA,e-CFdoeshavethebenefitofnothavingtobeusefuloutsideofEuropebutthisisalsoahindrancetouptakeonaglobalscale.Undoubtedly,therewouldbebenefitsforindustryiftherewereoneaccepted,properlyfunded,framework.

    Thecomplexityofthemappingshouldnotbeunderestimated.ByhavingtwodifferentstructuresandsomedifferencesintheunderlyingprinciplesitisnotsostraightforwardtosimplyalignskillswithcompetenciesandLevelswithLevels.Thisrequiresextractionandcomparisonofthewordsfromthevariouspartsofeachframework.Thatsaidwhilstamappingiscomplexandwouldneedtobemaintainedasnewversionsoftheframeworksarepublished,itisnonethelessstraightforwardtoseehowtheframeworkscouldbebroughttogetheroveranumberofiterations,albeitthatanumberofunderlyingprinciplesofeachframeworkneedtobeagreed.

    Infact,itisprobablyeasiertoseehowthetwoframeworkscouldbebroughttogetherthantoestablishamappingofthetwoframeworksforequivalenceandmaintainthatmappingthroughfutureversionsofbothframeworks.

    BothframeworksclaimtobeacommonlanguageforITskillsandcompetency.Bizarrely,whiletherewasonlySFIA,therewasindeedacommonlanguageforITskills;sincetherearenowtwo‘languages’neitheristrulycommon.

    7.2 ConsiderationsforthetwoframeworksoperatingindependentlyThereisnoparticularreasonwhythetwoframeworksshouldnotgoonoperatingindependentlyinparallel.Afterall,SFIAhasbeenoperatingfor16yearsandhasestablishedaglobaluser-base–itmanagestosupportupdatestotheframeworkandsupportforitsusersdespiteoperatingwithminimalfunding.Thee-CF,whileconsiderablyyoungerandwithoutsuchastronguser-base,hasthebackingofsignificantEUfundingandanumberoforganisationslikeprofessionalbodies‘pushingitdown’tousers.Thissituationcouldcertainlycontinuebutdoesleadtoanumberofconfusions:

    § IndustryandBusinessareunsurewhichframeworktoadopt

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page20of24

    o Theydonotwanttobackthewrongone,sowillprobablydonothingwhilewaitingforthedusttosettle.

    § Nationalsupportorganisationsareunsurewhichtorecommend

    o Decisionswilltypicallybemadeforpoliticalratherthansoundengineeringreasons.

    § IndustryandBusinessalwaysquestionwhythetwoexistinthefirstplace

    § Serviceprovidersdonotwanttohavetosupporttwoframeworks

    § Bothorganisationswillbewatchingtheotherratherthandoingtherightthingforindustryandbusiness

    § Bothframeworksneedsimilarsupport

    o Thisisexpensivetodotwice,itwouldbebettertoputeffortsintoprovidingonedefinitiveframework

    Tosomedegreetherewillalwaysbedifferentframeworksapartfrome-CFandSFIA.Inrecentmonthsi-CDfromJapanhaveapproachedtheSFIAFoundationtoaskhowitmanagesitsactivitiesandislookingtocollaboratewithSFIAtogainmorerecognitioninternationally.AnumberofothercountrieshaveapproachedSFIAinrecentmonthsforguidanceindevelopingormanagingtheirskillsframeworks.

    7.3 ConsiderationsinSFIAande-CFmoving‘closertogether’Inbringingthetwoframeworksclosertogetheritistheunderlyingconceptsofthetwoframeworksandtheintendedusethatneedtobeconsideredfirst.Oncetheseareagreedthenthealignmentofe-CFtotheEQFand,inparticular,thatgreaterknowledgemaynotequatetogreaterlevelofoperation,influenceorcompetencecanbeconsideredandthenthenumberofLevels(howcan5Levelsalignto7Levels?)canbeestablished

    Inpractice,theLevelscauseproblems;peoplenaturallywanttobeseenasthehighestleveltheycan–afterall,beingSFIALevel7mustbebetterthanbeingSFIALevel6(andsimilarlyfore-CF),althoughthemostcompetentpersoninaparticularareamaybeSFIALevel6andnotLevel7.

    AstothenumberofLevels,whileSFIAhashad7levelssinceitsinceptiontherehasbeenon-goingdebatewhetherthisistherightnumber–itisnotthattheremightbefewerlevelsbutmore.

    Whilethereareobviousbenefitstobehadfromthetwoframeworkscomingclosertogether,orperhapsmergingasone,thisneedstobewellconsideredasitwillinevitablyleadtoconfusionandpotentiallydamagetheexistinguserbase.

    Thefollowingwillneedtobeconsidered:

    § Whatdoes‘movingclosertogether’mean?

    o Isthismutualrecognitionofapproachesandlevellingormergingtoarriveatoneglobalframework?

    § Users

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page21of24

    o e-CF–Theuserbase,althoughonlysmallandconfinedtoEurope,hasinvestedinadoptingthisframeworkandwouldnotwanttomovetosomethingelse.

    o SFIA–TheSFIAuserbase,muchlargerandglobal,hassimilarlyinvestedandwouldnotwanttomovetosomethingthatitseesaslessrelevant.

    § Ownership

    o e-CFisseenasownedbyEuropeandmovingtoownershipby‘professionalbodies’

    o SFIAisseenas‘owned’bytheusersandistrulyglobal.

    § Approachtoadoption

    o e-CFisseentobepushingtheframeworkdowntousersfromthe‘ownershipcommittee’.

    o SFIAisnot‘pushed’byanyone;itis‘pulled’byusers.TheSFIABoard,althoughrecognisedasinthe‘controlposition’isnotfelttobepushingSFIA;ifanything,theusersseetheBoardholdingback.

    § Globalisation

    o e-CF,oncewellestablished,isEuropeanandlargelydrivenbytheEUdowntotheEuropeanCountries.

    o SFIA,ontheotherhand,istrulyglobalwithsignificantuseandrepresentationfromcountriesoutsideofEurope:thismustberecognisedand,inparticular,thatthereisnocentralorganisationpushingthis.

    § Funding

    o Howwouldthemergingbefunded?o Howwouldtheendframeworkbefundedonanon-goingbasis?

    § Timescales

    o TherearestillSFIAusersonSFIAV4andV5;thereisnoparticularreasonwhytheyshouldmovetoanewversion,presumablythisistruefore-CF.Therequirementsforthiswouldneedtobeconsidered.

    o Itseemsreasonablethatoveroneortwoupdatecyclesthetwoframeworkscouldbebroughtclosertogetherandindeedmergedinthattimeframe.

    § Leadership

    o Leadershipformergingwouldneedtobeestablishedwithoutfearfortheuserbase.

    § Users

    o Throughoutsuchactivitiestheuserswouldhavetobetheprimaryconsideration;thisframeworkshould,firstandforemost,beintendedtoenableuserstodeveloptheskillsoftheirstafforindividualstoenhancetheirownskills.Useforpromotingcertificationorparticulartrainingorqualificationsshouldbesecondary.

    § Migration

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page22of24

    o Apartfromanunderstandingofmappingshouldtherebeanapproachforausermigratingfromoneframeworktoanother?

    § UnderlyingPrinciples

    o Acommonsetofunderlyingprincipleswouldneedtobeestablished.

    § Levels

    o Arigorousalignmentoflevelswouldneedtobeestablished.o RealignmentoftheLevelsofbothFrameworksslightlywouldclarifythe

    mappingandleadtoanobviousmovingtogether.Aligninge-CFLevels1-5strictlytoSFIA2-6wouldaddresstheneedtowidenoperationalLevelsinSFIA,andrecognisethelevelbelowe-CFandthemoreCxOnatureofSFIALevel7.

    o AlthoughtherewouldbeconsequencesforbothSFIAande-CFthisshouldbeconsideredforamovingtogether.ClearlytheissuesforSFIAwouldaffectmanymoreSFIAusers,andtherewouldbeissuesregardingEQFalignmentfore-CFthatwouldprobablyaffecttrainingprovidersmorethanend-userorganisations.

    8 PossibleOutlineCollaborationProject8.1 OverviewWhileitisoutofscopeofthiscomparisonandmappingreportitisneverthelessworthconsideringanoutlineofacollaborationproject.

    Fundamentally,thissectionconsidersasensibleapproachtocollaboratingandultimatelymergingthetwoframeworksintooneasthereseemslittlepointinstoppingshortofthis.Itispossibletocollaboratewithoutultimatelymergingbutisunlikelytobesuccessful:SFIAisglobalandmustaddressglobalneedswithminimalfundingandcertainlynofundingtoallowtakingpartinsuchacollaborationonanequalbasisofinvolvement;e-CFhasaEuropeanfocus,iswell-fundedandcanengageinthepoliticalissuesnecessarytodrivethisthroughbutdoesnothavetheglobalreachortheuserinvolvement.Inanysuchprojectthefollowingconditionsshouldbemet:

    § Thereshouldbenonegativeimpactoncurrentusers

    § Existingusersmustseetheirinvestmentprotected

    § Theremustbeequalparticipationfrombothparties

    § Thereshouldbeapublishedroadmapforthisproject

    § Thereshouldbeanincrementalbringingtogetherthroughnewversionsofeachframework

    § The‘merging’mustbeabletobestoppedatanytimewithoutdamagingeitherframeworkortheinvestmentofcurrentusers

    § Theendproductmustbeupwardlycompatiblefrompreviousversionsofeachframework

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page23of24

    8.2 PhasedapproachtoCollaborationTheprojectshouldbesplitintoanumberofPhases:

    § Phase1CollaborationPlanning

    o ComparisonandMappingReviewo DefinitionofRoadmapandIntento Clarificationofownership,fundingandcollaborationstructureo Definitionofthecollaborationframeworko CollaborationCheckpoint

    § Phase2CollaborationandMergingActivities

    o Establishjointoperationso Initiatecollaborativeupdatecycle–iterative(over3-5years)o Establishglobalusercommunityinfrastructureo DefineandestablishFrameworkinfrastructureo Checkpointsthroughout

    § Phase3Operation

    o Singleoperation–BAU(business-as-usual)

  • SFIA–e-CFComparison&MappingReview

    IanSeward,[email protected] Page24of24

    AppendixA

    DetailofthecomparisonmappingofindividualskillsandcompetenciesineachframeworkisprovidedintheassociatedExcelMappingMatrices–SFIAV6e-CFComparisonV1.0.

    Acomparisonsummaryofsomeoftheareasthatneedtobeconsideredinselectingormergingtheframeworksisprovidedbelow.

    Comparison*Point SFIA e2CF

    Coverage*of*breadth*and*depth*of*Enterprise*IT*(See**mapping*matrices)

    Greater*coverage*for*typical*roles*and*operating*models*found*in*IT.Greater*granularity*e.g.*c.*18*skills*in*Delivery*&*Operation

    Some*single*competencies*may*encompass*several*skills*e.g.*Service**Delivery*as*a*single*competence.

    Detail Greater*detail*per*skill*in*SFIA*(if*e2CF*Dimension*4*is*not*considered).Less*detail*per*competence*in*e2CF.This*is*bolstered*by*the*additions*of*'Skills*and*Knowledge*statements'.

    Structure* Logical*consistent*structure. Logical*consistent*structure.

    Approach The*SFIA*approach*of*everything*needed*being*described*in*one*paragraphj*per*skill*level*is*in*response*to*industry*requirements.The*multi2dimensional*approach*of*e2CF*aids*clarity*when*within*a*tool*but*less*usable*without*tool*support.

    Longevity*/*Currency 15+*years*/*Version*6*2015 7+*years*/*Version*3*2014

    Technologies,*methods,*knowledge*and*qualifications SFIA*does*not*mandate*technologies,*methods*or*qualifications.

    e2CF*'suggests'*methods*and*knowledge*within*Dimension*4*statements*that*might*be*required.

    Underlying*principles Requires*demonstrated*experience*of*performing*the*skill*at*levelGeneric*responsibility*levels*attributes*are*key.Alignment*ot*EQFGeneric*attributes*of*levels*described*but*their*importance*is*unclear.

    Documentation Single*Complete*Reference*Model*Document.Less*professionally*presented.

    Multiple*documents*describing*the*framework*and*how*the*framework*has*been*created.More*professional*publications.

    Availability Free*to*download*from*the*SFIA*website.Available*in*6*languages*(more*planned).Free*to*download*from*the*SFIA*website.Available*in*4*languages*(more*planned).

    Need*for*interpretation SFIA*needs*to*be*interpreted*in*use. e2CF*needs*to*be*interpreted*in*use.

    Update*approach Open*consultation*of*the*global*userbase,*proposed*changes*reviewed*by*the*userbase*and*managed*publication.Updates*by*expert*panel*selected*from*e2CF*community*and*framework*authoring**consultants.

    CostsFree*of*charge*for*non2commercial*(end2user)*useLicence*fee*for*commercial*exploitation(service*providers*and*tool*vendors)

    Free*of*charge*for*all*use.

    Funding Modest*licence*fee*for*commercial*exploitation. Funded*by*EU.

    Long*tern*sustainability Currently*self*sustaining*from*licence*fees. Unknown*should*EU*funding*cease.

    Marketing*Model Pull*from*industry. Push*from*EU*/*Professional*Bodies.

    User*Base

    Difficult*to*estimate.**Some*use*in*nearly*200*countries.**Around*4000*user*licences*for*SFIA*V6.*Many*thousands*of*other*users*from*SFIA*V4*and*V5*but*information*archived*as*not*used*to*market*SFIA.Probably*many*thousands*of*unlicenced*users*globally.

    Difficult*to*estimate.*40*case*studies*published.**This*is*being*pushed*by*the*EU*so*there*is*probably*greater*uptake*than*from*the*case*studies*alone.

    Ecosystem

    Significant*supporting*infrastructure*including:User*Council,*user*community,*governing*body.Accreditation*of*consultants*,*partners*and*traininers.User*conferences*in*UK*and*Australia.

    e2CF*is*yet*to*establish*the*same*ecosystem*as*SFIA.