session 1[1].1 - tonkonogy presentation

Upload: sebascian

Post on 30-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    1/37

    SETTING THE STANDARD IN GREENHOUSE GAS MANAGEMENTCLIMATE LEADERS

    Greenhouse Gas Workshop:

    Developing a GHG Management Strategy

    Federal Environmental Symposium East

    June 2, 2008

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    2/37

    Federal Leadership on climate and

    energy

    Energy Star

    175 Federal buildings with Energy Star label

    Portfolio Manager (Veterans Administration has linkedenergy tracking system to provide current ratings)

    New feature in PM to calculate emissions from buildingdata

    Green Power Partnership- U.S. Air Force, VA, andEPA among top purchasers

    Federal Energy Management Program

    Collecting energy data, promoting best practices,emissions calculations

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    3/37

    Main Street Significant public interest,

    green shoppers, educatedconsumers

    Employee satisfaction Staff want to feel employeris good corporate citizen

    E.O. 13423 Annual energy efficiency and renewable energy goals

    Goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissionsLegislation coming? Draft House bill H.R. 3221 (2007) included requirement

    for agencies to inventory GHG emissions as part ofCarbon Neutral Government Act (did not pass)

    Next Frontier:

    Agency-wide greenhouse gas management

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601070409,00.htmlhttp://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601060403,00.html
  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    4/37

    Benefits of Developing a Strategy

    Reduce impact on the global environment Better manage greenhouse gas emissions and

    associated risks across emissions sources (buildings,fleets, plants, etc)

    Realize cost savings through energy efficiency Integrate climate change strategies with State,

    Regional, and International GHG accounting schemes

    National Renewable Energy Laboratory and

    U.S. Forest Service

    are Partners in Climate Leaders

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    5/37

    Climate Leaders works with organizations to developa long-term comprehensive GHG management

    strategy

    Road-tested with nearly 200 partners from every major

    sector across the country, representing 8% U.S.emissions and 10% U.S. GDP

    3 critical components to credible strategy Complete Agency-Wide GHG Inventory Develop Inventory Management Plan (IMP)

    Set Aggressive Agency-Wide GHG Reduction Goal Annual reporting to EPA creates lasting record of

    accomplishments and identifies agency asenvironmental leader

    EPA recognizes and publicizes progress in the program

    Credible Climate Strategy

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    6/37

    Program Participation Steps

    Partner Joins Program

    EPA assists Partner in developing inventory and inventorymanagement plan (generally within 1 year)

    Partner reports annual inventory data to EPA anddocuments progress toward goal

    Partner may participate in meetings, public outreach,press events, etc.

    Partner sets agency wide 5-10 year GHG reduction goal

    Partner Achieves Goal

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    7/37

    Climate Leaders Partnersreceive high-level recognition via:

    Press events Recognition events with EPA Page on CL web site Use of program logo Articles in local, national, and

    trade magazines Partner conferences, newsletters,

    speaking opportunities Public Service Announcements

    (PSAs) in mainstream press.2007-8 PSA seen by over 10million people

    National Public Recognition

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    8/37

    ReportingReportingFirst and SecondFirst and Second

    ComponentsComponents

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    9/37

    EPA Inventory Guidance

    Based on

    International WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol:

    The most widely used international accounting tool for

    government and business leaders to understand,quantify, and manage energy use and greenhouse gasemissions.

    Convened in 1998 by the World Resources Institute(WRI) and the World Business Council for SustainableDevelopment (WBCSD)

    Multi-stakeholder development process included severalhundred individuals from corporations, NGOs, andgovernments throughout the world.

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    10/37

    GHG Protocol- Global Adoption

    Voluntary Climate Initiatives

    U.S. EPA Climate Leaders Program

    China, India, Mexico, Brazil, and

    Philippines GHG Management Programs

    Korea National GHG Registry

    South Africa NBI/BUSA-DEAT Initiative

    WWF Climate Savers Program

    GHG Registries

    The Climate Registry

    US DOE 1605b Registry WEF Global Registry

    Multilateral Non-government Initiatives

    International Standards Organization (ISO)

    Industry Initiatives WBCSD CSI Protocol

    International Forum of Forest

    and Paper Associations

    International Aluminium Institute

    Market Initiatives

    AP 6 Initiative Cement Sector

    Protocol

    Carbon Disclosure Project

    Chicago Climate Exchange

    EU Emissions Trading Scheme

    (informed by GHG Protocol

    calculation tools)

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    11/37

    Required Agency-wide

    6 major Greenhouse Gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, PFC, HFC,SF6)

    Direct emissions Indirect emissions from electricity, heat, and steam

    Optional

    Offset projects Employee travel and commuting

    Product transport

    Contractor operations/sites

    First Component:

    Develop a Customized Inventory

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    12/37

    Step 1

    Identify Organizational Boundaries

    Which facilities should you include?ORGANIZATIONAL

    BOUNDARY

    APPROACH

    EQUITY SHARE(by % ownership)

    CONTROL

    FINANCIAL CONTROL

    (by economic interest)

    OPERATIONAL

    CONTROL

    (by operating policies)

    Approach matters most for treatment of partially owned or

    operated facilities (e.g. government owned contractor operated)and for lease agreements

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    13/37

    Step 2

    Identify Operational Boundaries

    Which sources of emissions should you include?

    Stationary Combustion of fossil fuel

    Process emissions Mobile Sources

    Refrigeration/AC

    Purchased electricity or steam

    Other Sources: backup generators, fuel forheating, aircraft, anaerobic wastewater treatment

    Optional Sources (e.g., business travel)

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    14/37

    Emissions Scopes

    Source: WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    15/37

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    16/37

    Step 3

    Choose a Base Year

    Typically the most recent year for which quality dataare available

    For federal agencies may be defined by E.O. 13423guidelines

    Rules for adjusting your base year data for: Acquisitions/divestitures: adjust your base year data

    when these occur

    Organic growth/decline: do not adjust your base yeardata

    Question to ask: Are these new emissions to the

    atmosphere, or did they exist previously?

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    17/37

    Second Component

    Create an Inventory Management Plan

    Institutionalizes process

    Develop and implement an IMP or a similar collection ofStandard Operating Procedures and document process

    EPA provides checklist ofcomponents for good IMP touse as guideline whenpreparing documentation

    EPA offers technicalassistance to helporganizations complete IMP

    documentation

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    18/37

    IMP Components

    Partner Information Boundary Conditions

    Facilities and sources included

    Emissions quantifications

    Methods and factors Data management Activity data, data management process, QA/QC

    Base Year Adjustment thresholds

    Management tools Roles & responsibilities, training, document retention

    policies Auditing & verification

    Internal & external

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    19/37

    IMP Requirement Example

    A list of emission factors and other constants andreference for factors and constants (i.e. GlobalWarming Potentials and conversion factors) for eachemission category

    Descriptions of the process for how external references

    are kept current Where multiple factors are used, specify which facility /

    source uses the respective factor

    Agency should provide specific information on theemission factors and other constants used to developGHG inventory

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    20/37

    Inventory Management Plan

    Internal Benefits

    Institutionalizes inventory process

    Leads to comprehensive & credible data management

    Increases efficiency/lowers costs by centralizingprocesses

    Increases accuracy and transparency

    Facilitates long-term emissions/goal tracking May facilitate documentation of capital savings

    Allows for continual improvement

    IMP provides assurance that Partners develop a high-quality inventory that is consistently maintained andupdated over time

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    21/37

    Resources Available

    p://www.epa.gov/climateleaders/resources/index.html

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    22/37

    GOALSGOALS

    Third ComponentThird Component

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    23/37

    Third Component

    Set an aggressive, long-term GHG goal

    Absolute 3M pledges to reduce total U.S. GHG emissions by 30

    percent from 2002 to 2007

    Normalized

    Holcim (US) Inc. pledges to reduce U.S. GHG emissionsby 12 percent per ton of cement from 2000 to 2008

    Index Ball Corporation pledges to reduce total U.S. GHG

    emissions by 16 percent per production index from 2002

    to 2012 Net Zero (Carbon Neutral)

    Melaver, Inc. pledges to achieve net zero U.S. GHGemissions by 2006 and maintain that level through 2009

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    24/37

    Ensuring leadership goals

    Criteria: Agency-Wide

    Based on the most recent base year for which data areavailable

    Achieved over 5 to 10 years Expressed as an absolute GHG reduction or as a

    decrease in GHG intensity

    Aggressive compared to the projected GHGperformance for the sector

    EPA individually negotiates each

    Climate Leaders goal

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    25/37

    Benefits of Setting a Goal

    Focus high-level attention on existing and potentialreduction activities

    Institutionalize management and tracking of progressfor energy and GHG reduction activities

    Encourage innovation

    Identify new reduction opportunities

    Employee morale, recruiting, and retention

    Positive media attention

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    26/37

    How to set a goal

    Assemble a broad-based team Engineers, environmental, energy, communications,

    procurement, policy

    Analyze GHG data

    Relative contribution of scope 1 vs 2 vs 3 Compare similar facilities

    absolute energy level

    intensity (e.g. energy use per square foot of building space)

    Evaluate historic data and trends if possible Identify any existing company goals in energy and/or

    environment

    E.g. EO 13423

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    27/37

    Analyze Future Scenarios

    Identify planned construction, moves, facilityclosures, etc and likely effects on emissions

    Analyze low and high ranges of growth

    projections Facility- office, data centers, labs

    FTEs

    Analyze energy price forecasts

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    28/37

    Identifying Reduction Opportunities

    Identify best practices in marketplace Energy management systems

    automated tracking

    corporate energy manager and team

    Innovative technologies

    Identify projects Already in pipeline

    Energy efficiency

    Renewable energy

    Capital projects that might improve efficiency Future possibilities/ wish list

    Conduct financial analysis of projects

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    29/37

    Working with a 3rd Party

    Working with a 3rd party to set a goal can addcredibility to your effort

    EPA process:

    1) Partner presents an initial goal proposal to EPA(based on inventory and internal analysis)

    2) EPA completes performance benchmarkanalysis- evaluates sector business-as-usualenergy/carbon intensity performance

    3) Partner and EPA negotiate a mutually agreeablegoal- aggressive yet achievable

    4) EPA publicly announces a goal and providesrecognition for companys efforts

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    30/37

    EPA Analysis

    Creating a Performance Benchmark

    DOEs National Energy Modeling System (NEMS)

    forecasts fuel-specific consumption for heavy industry forecasts commercial building energy demand

    Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Forecastinput/output tables for the US economy estimates fuel quantities purchased/$output

    ICFs Integrated Planning Model (IPM) For electric generators

    Three models to determine Business-As-Usual sectorimprovement rates & current average intensity ratesbased on companys sector

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    31/37

    Sample Goal Setting Analysis

    California Portland Cement Company

    Goal Proposal: 9% per production index from 2003-2012

    Sectors forecasted benchmark improvement rate

    (NEMS model): Reduce CO2 emissions by 4.12% per ton of cement

    output by 2012

    Cal Portland exceeds forecasted BAU improvementrate by 118%

    Additional Factors: Energy Star Partner (Partner of theYear 2005), current intensity better than sector average

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    32/37

    Tracking your Progress

    Always track your absolute emissions

    If you choose a normalized goal:

    Determine an appropriate production metric that makessense for your agency

    Should correlate closely to GHG emissions to measureaccurately improvements in efficiency

    Examples: square footage of building space (energytracks more closely to this than to, e.g. # employees)

    If you divest a facility, make sure to adjust forproduction metric as well as emissions

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    33/37

    Using RECs and Offsets

    Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and offsetsare considered an adjustment to emissions and canbe used towards meeting goals

    RECs - credible way to reduce emissions from

    electricity use, should follow green power marketdefinitions for eligibility

    Offsets - project-based reductions, apply towardsScopes 1 and 3 Climate Leaders methodologies for landfill gas,

    anaerobic digesters, commercial & industrial boilers,transit bus projects, reforestation/afforestation

    Based on performance standard approach

    Questions on whether federal government authorized tomake these purchases

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    34/37

    Going carbon neutral

    1. Develop a robust GHG inventory and inventorymanagement plan

    Include at least one significant optional source

    2. Achieve Internal GHG Reductions

    Commit to implementing internal GHG reductionmeasures. This commitment should be expressed asan internal GHG reduction goal that is aggressive as astand-alone goal

    3. Purchase Green Power, Renewable Energy Certificates

    (RECs), and/or Offsets Green Power/RECs to reduce emissions associatedwith electricity use

    Project-based reductions to offset the remainingemissions from direct, other indirect, and optional

    emissions sources

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    35/37

    Results

    Leadership in the Defense Industry

    2004: UTC pledges to reduce global GHG emissions by 16

    percent per dollar revenue from 2001-2006.

    2006: Lockheed Martin pledges to reduce U.S. GHG

    emissions by 30 percent per dollar revenue from 2001-2010.

    Raytheon Company pledges to reduce U.S. GHGemissions by 33 percent per dollar revenue from 2002-2009.

    2007: UTC reduced global GHG emissions by 46 percent per

    dollar revenue from 2001-2006. UTC pledged to reducetotal global GHG emissions by 12 percent from 2006-2010.

    ??2008??

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    36/37

    Low Hanging Fruit Lighting Projects (sensors, CFL and high efficiency lights) Upgrade Cooling (high efficiency units, system balance) Reduce Plug Load (high efficiency equipment) Variable Speed Systems for Air Handling and Product

    Distribution Mobile Sources (employee travel/commuting and product

    transport)

    Higher Hanging Fruit Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Landfill Gas Recovery

    Install Green Power (solar panels, micro turbines)Innovative Projects

    New Heating/Cooling Systems (ice, under floor distribution,solar and wind building exposure)

    Green Roofs

    General GHG Reduction Methods

  • 8/14/2019 Session 1[1].1 - Tonkonogy Presentation

    37/37

    Thank you

    Manuel J Oliva, PE

    (202) 343-9094

    [email protected]

    Bella Tonkonogy

    (202) 343-9183

    [email protected]

    www.epa.gov/climateleaders