session 101 panel discussion pandemic modeling for group ... · russian flu (h1n1)* 11. 2009-2010....

52
Session 101 PD, Pandemic Modeling for Group Life Insurance Presenters: Timothy B. Moran ASA, MAAA Kimiko Tan SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer

Upload: others

Post on 21-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Session 101 PD, Pandemic Modeling for Group Life Insurance

    Presenters: Timothy B. Moran ASA, MAAA

    Kimiko Tan

    SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer

    https://www.soa.org/legal/antitrust-disclaimer/https://www.soa.org/legal/presentation-disclaimer/

  • Pandemic Modeling in Group Life Insurance

    Tim Moran2nd VP and Group ActuaryMunich Re

  • Agenda

    1. Background and History2. Risk Management for Group Life Insurers3. Pandemic Models4. Results

    13 June 2017 2© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Agenda

    1. Background and History2. Risk Management for Group Life Insurers3. Pandemic Models4. Results

    13 June 2017 3© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Pandemics: Understanding the Risk

    13 June 2017 4© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • What can we predict about the next pandemic event?

    13 June 2017 5© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Agenda

    1. Background and History2. Risk Management for Group Life Insurers3. Pandemic Models4. Results

    13 June 2017 6© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Group Life Insurance Risk Management Objectives

    Quantify economic consequences

    Evaluate options for risk mitigation

    Plan for disruptions to financial markets

    Consider a range of outcomes, varying frequency and severity

    13 June 2017 7© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Capital Planning & Solvency

    Minimize operational disruptions

    Financial operations may be limited

    Consider a range of outcomes, varying frequency and severity

    Business Continuity Planning

    Pandemics present a material risk from both a financial and operational view

    Lack of planning and modeling can lead to incomplete/poor risk management strategy

  • Group Life Insurance Pandemic Strategies

    Strategy Pro Con

    Limit geographic exposure/concentration

    Can be effective if mortality remains localized.

    If pandemic spreads globally, will not provide adequate protection.

    Hedge with longevity products Negative covariance with no reduction in block size or profits in favorable scenarios

    Hedge may prove ineffective.

    Quota Share or Excess Reinsurance

    Effective way to limit losses for particular block of policies.

    Does not fully immunize carrier from incidence spikes.

    Tail stop-loss reinsurance/capital relief reinsurance

    Relatively inexpensive way to protect capital.

    Temporary surplus protection. Losses generally are paid back.

    Mortality swaps Remove uncertainty about payments. Increase capacity to sell new business.

    Complex and difficult to implement. Need to find a willing partner.

    Sell mortality cat bonds Transfer extreme risks to the capital markets; access to deep capital pools.

    May introduce basis risk if trigger is amortality index.

    Purchase pandemic insurance coverage

    Explicitly protects against defined mortality spike.

    May not be available when needed. Difficult to pass costs on to customers.

    13 June 2017 8© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Agenda

    1. Background and History2. Risk Management for Group Life Insurers3. Pandemic Models4. Results

    13 June 2017 9© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Definitions and Modeling Considerations

    13 June 2017 10© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    A pandemic is a widespread infectious disease.

    A disease or condition is not a pandemic merely because it kills many people; it must also be infectious.

    Two broad categories are influenza and “other infectious diseases”.

    Influenza•Seasonal•Epidemic and pandemic

    Other Infectious Diseases•Bacterial•Vector-Borne

  • Model Overview

    Apply excess mortality probabilities to a specific block of business by age and gender to determine frequency (e.g. “return periods”) and severity

    13 June 2017 11© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Create assumption sets for each modeled pathogen (virulence, transmissibility) and model input parameter (vaccines, pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions.

    Assign probabilities to each input parameter.

    Develop a set of events by combining inputs in SIR model to calculate population mortality rates for a given combination of inputs.

    Use stochastic approach to produce distribution of mortality rates

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Input

    Output

  • Frequency – Influenza Pandemic

    13 June 2017 12© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Historical Influenza PandemicsYear(s) Name R0 Virulence

    1 1729-1733 high high2 1761-17623 1780-1782 very high very low4 1788-1790 very high low5 1830-1837 very high low6 1889-1893 Russian Flu 2.1 0.1-0.28%7 1918-1919 Spanish Flu (H1N1) 1.5-5 >2%8 1957-1958 Asian Flu (H2N2) 1.5-1.7 0.13%9 1968-1969 Hong Kong Flu (H3N2) 1.5-2.2

  • Frequency – Infectious Disease Pandemic

    13 June 2017 13© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Historical Infectious Disease Pandemics and EpidemicsYear(s) Name Disease or pathogen

    1 1629-1631 Italian plague/Great Plague of Milan Bubonic plague2 1665-1666 Great plague of London Bubonic plague3 1679 Great plague of Vienna Bubonic plague4 1775-1782 North American smallpox Smallpox5 1793; 1690-1878 Yellow fever, U.S. Yellow fever6 1816-1824 First Cholera Pandemic Cholera7 1826-1837 Second Cholera Pandemic Cholera8 1846-1863 Third Cholera Pandemic Cholera9 1863-1875 Fourth Cholera Pandemic Cholera

    10 1881-1896 Fifth Cholera Pandemic Cholera11 1899-1923 Sixth Cholera Pandemic Cholera

    12 1962-1966 Seventh/El Tor Cholera Pandemic Cholera

    13 1855-1959 Third Pandemic Bubonic plague

    14 1918-1922 Russian Typhus Epidemic Typhus

    15 1981-present HIV/AIDS HIV/AIDS16 2013-2016 West African Ebola Epidemic * Ebola

    Expected pandemic frequency(per 100 years)

    2.5 - 5.0 influenza 0.5 - 1.5 infectious disease

    Based upon historical record

  • Basic Compartmental Model

    13 June 2017 14© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Time series model with discrete states:

    S(t) = number susceptible at time t I(t) = number infectious at time tR(t) = number recovered / immune at time t

    SIR model aids in predicting the spread of pathogens in a given population and the duration of pandemic

  • % Dead =

    Simulated Mortality using SIR

    Time 0

    Initial Outbreak …

    Time 1 …

    Time 2 …

    Susceptible

    Infected

    Recovered/ Immune

    Time “t”

    13 June 2017© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved. 15

  • Factors impacting SIR state transition

    Speed at which pandemic spreads and total number infected, measured by the

    Initial Reproductive Number, R0

    Ability of a disease to cause death, measured by case-fatality rate or

    average deaths per case Excess mortality reduced for effective

    and available vaccine

    Pharmaceutical interventions include antibiotics, antivirals, anti-parasitic, etc.

    NPIs attempt to slow introduction and spread of the disease. Include

    quarantine, school and business closures, travel restrictions, etc.

    Susceptibility of infection and recovery varies by age and other demographic

    factors

    Transmissibility Virulence Vaccine

    Non-Pharm interventionsPharmaceutical interventions Demographics

    13 June 2017© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved. 16

  • Transmissibility

    13 June 2017 17© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    R0 is the average number of secondary cases caused by one person in a population without immunity and without intervention.

    R0 must be greater than 1 for an epidemic to occur.

    The Initial Reproductive Number, “R0”, measures the transmissibility of an influenza-type disease.

    IT is the proportion of the population that must be immunized or have prior immunity to stem infectious disease transmission

    20% of historical disease pandemics have high transmissibility (>= 80)

    Immunity Threshold (IT) parameter used to model transmissibility of non-influenza infectious diseases

  • Virulence

    The virulence of a pathogen is measured in terms of its case-fatality rate (CFR) or average “deaths per case”

    As with transmissibility, virulence is modeled separately for influenza and infectious disease.

    CFR will vary depending on the population being studied

    13 June 2017 18© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Vaccine, Pharmaceutical and Non-Pharm Intervention

    13 June 2017 19© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    The vaccine parameter in the model discounts excess mortality for effective and available vaccines and represents the proportion of the population with immunity to the pathogen.

    Pharmaceuticals are the primary mechanisms for reducing mortality from infectious diseases.

    Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) are measures that attempt to slow the introduction of disease and subsequent transmission throughout a population.

    NPIs particularly important in the period between the emergence of an infectious disease and when a vaccine can be developed and made widely available.

  • Demography and Geography

    The age & gender profile for a disease are critical in how it impacts various groups:

    13 June 2017 20© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Demographic mortality profiles for influenza:

    1) Seasonal – affects the youngest and oldest lives most (i.e. U-shaped)2) Pandemic – where there is a larger impact on working age lives 3) Residual immunity – where the impact is relatively flat, affecting all ages equally, due to

    residual immunity in older ages

    Demographic mortality distributions for infectious diseases:

    1) Flat – where all ages will be affected by the disease equally2) Middle-aged – primarily affects the working-age population or otherwise healthy adults3) Young & old – primarily affects the younger and older individuals and those with weakened

    immune systems

  • Example of Event Set Development

    13 June 2017 21© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Description Transmissibility CFR VP Case PharmaceuticalDemographic

    Case

    Measles TI=95 0.01 No ImmunitySupportive

    CareYoung & Old

    H1N1 Influenza

    R0=2 0.025 No ImmunitySupportive

    Care/ResistanceResidual Immunity

    Input: variables for two different types of infectious events into SIR model

    Description LikelihoodTotal

    Fatalities (US)

    Measles 3.71 x 10-6 2,264,675

    H1N1 Influenza

    3.27 x 10-6 1,680,348

    Output: mortality rates

  • Results From Similar Events

    13 June 2017 22© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Event Description Vaccine Pharmaceutical LikelihoodTotal

    Fatalities (US)

    Flu909

    H1N1 Influenza No immunitySupportive

    Care/Resistance3.27x 10-6 1,680,348

    Flu912

    H1N1 Influenza No ImmunitySupportive Care/ No

    Resistance2.62x 10-5 988,440

    Flu 900

    H1N1 Influenza 30%Supportive Care/ No

    Resistance7.85x 10-5 790,752

    Each event is a plausible combination of transmissibility, virulence, vaccine, pharmaceutical factors.

  • Agenda

    1. Background and History2. Risk Management for Group Life Insurers3. Pandemic Models4. Results

    13 June 2017 23© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Deterministic Scenarios

    13 June 2017 24© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Study SeverityExcess

    Mortality ‰Mckibbin-Sidorenko Mild 0.10US Congressional Budget Office Mild 0.34US Department of Health and Human Services Moderate 0.70Mckibbin-Sidorenko (Australia) Moderate 1.10Australian Treasury; ABARE Moderate 2.00Mckibbin-Sidorenko Severe 5.40US Department of Health and Human Services Severe 6.30US Congressional Budget Office Severe 7.50Mckibbin-Sidorenko Ultra 10.90

    Various economic studies have quantified deterministic excess mortality scenarios.

    “Return Period” translates the severity to frequency of pandemic events; e.g. Severe = 1 per 500 years & Moderate = 1 per 50 years

  • Impact of Deterministic Scenario on Insured Block

    Simple Excel-based tool to model deterministic pandemic scenario against your insurance portfolio (available on SOA.org):

    − Input “moderate” or “severe” pandemic− Set shape of excess mortality rate curve to “U”,

    “W”, “V\”

    − Set company data (either individual or group)− For group, determine insured population death

    based on distribution of working ages and mortality % of general population

    13 June 2017 25© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    1918 Influenza mortality rate by age

  • Financial Impact From Moderate Pandemic

    13 June 2017 26© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Annual Group Life Insurance Benefits Paid

    ModeratePandemic

    Average Group Life Mortality (per year)

    2.0 per 1000

    + Pandemic Excess Mortality 2.0 per 1000

    = Total Mortality 4.0 per 1000

  • Comparing Group Life Insurance Pandemic Loss to Recent Financial Industry Events

    13 June 2017 27© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

    Corporation Year What happened Amount in 2008 $US

    ● Bear Stearns 2008JP Morgan purchased Bear Stearns for $236 million; the Federal Reserve provided a $30 billion credit line to ensure the sale could move forward. $30 billion

    ● Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac 2008On Sep. 7, 2008, Fannie and Freddie were essentially nationalized & placed under the conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The Treasury has invested billions to cover the companies' losses.

    $400 billion

    ●American International Group (A.I.G.)

    2008 On four separate occasions, the government has offered aid to AIG to keep it from collapsing issuing a credit line of $180 billion between the Treasury ($70 billion) and Fed ($110 billion). $180 billion

    ● Auto Industry 2008In late September 2008, Congress approved a spending bill which included a measure for $25 billion in loans to the auto industry. These low-interest loans are intended to aid the industry. $25 billion

    ● Troubled Asset Relief Program 2008In October 2008, Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, which authorized the Treasury Department to spend $700 billion to combat the financial crisis. Treasury has been doling out the money via an alphabet soup of different programs. $700 billion

    ● Citigroup 2008Citigroup received a $25 billion investment through the TARP in Oct 2017 and another $20 billion in Nov 2017. In addition to the Treasury's $5 billion commitment, the FDIC has committed $10 billion and the Federal Reserve up to about $220 billion. $280 billion

    ● Bank of America 2009Bank of America has received $45 billion through the TARP, which includes $10 billion originally meant for Merrill Lynch. In addition, the Treasury made a $7.5 billion commitment, the FDIC has committed $2.5 billion and the Federal Reserve up to $87.2 billion.

    $142.2 billion

    Source: Propublica.org

  • • Next pandemic is inevitable, but impossible to predict timing and severity.

    • Group Life insurance industry has tools available to manage risks from pandemic events.

    • Distribution of excess mortality from pandemic can be modeled and incorporated into enterprise risk Strategy.

    • Model parameters set using known factors from historic pandemics and expert opinion.

    • Key factors that impact transitions in SIR model are transmissibility, virulence, vaccine, interventions (pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical) and demographics.

    • Deterministic modeling tools and scenarios are available and relatively simple.

    Recap

    13 June 2017 28© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Thank you!

    13 June 2017 29© 2017 Munich American Reassurance Company. All Rights Reserved.

  • Prepared by Aon BenfieldCatastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life Team

    Group Life – Catastrophic Perils

    Kimiko TamAon Benfield

  • 2Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Agenda

    Section 1 Peril OverviewSection 2 Modeling FrameworkSection 3 Challenges and SolutionsSection 4 Risk Management

  • 3Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Agenda

    Section 1 Peril OverviewSection 2 Modeling FrameworkSection 3 Challenges and SolutionsSection 4 Risk Management

  • 4Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Total Terrorist Attacks by Region in 2016

    Source: Aon’s 2017 Risk Maps for Political Risk, Terrorism and Political Violence

  • 5Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Terrorist Attacks in the US by Year

    Source: Aon’s 2017 Risk Maps for Political Risk, Terrorism and Political Violence

  • 6Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    US Earthquake Risk

    Source: USGS

  • 7Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Agenda

    Section 1 Peril OverviewSection 2 Modeling FrameworkSection 3 Challenges and SolutionsSection 4 Risk Management

  • 8Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Catastrophe Model Framework

    PolicyLocation

    PolicyTerms

    Risk Characteristics

    1Hazard or

    Science Module

    3Financial or Insurance Module

    2Vulnerability Module

  • 9Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Modelling Data Requirements

    Modeling

    Location Data

    Higher Accuracy Data

    Exposure Data

    Street Address, City, Zip Code, County, State, Country

    Latitude and Longitude Can supplement data from other

    sources

    Construction Type (e.g. year built, number of stories)

    Occupancy Code (e.g. type of industry and occupations in building)

    Line of Business, Net Retained Sums Insured, Aggregate Limits, Payouts

    At Work vs. At Home Age Bands (for Pandemic)

  • 10Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Agenda

    Section 1 Peril OverviewSection 2 Modeling FrameworkSection 3 Challenges and SolutionsSection 4 Risk Management

  • 11Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Strategy and Challenges

    Capture Good Location Data– Best data comes from the Policyholder– Can supplement from other sources

    • Where are the people? Avention or Dun & Bradstreet (license required) – Has number of employees by branch

    locations to help allocate exposure in cases where all employees were placed in the company corporate headquarters

    Census and Government Databases – Can use publicly available databases to allocate exposures for spouses and dependents, association insureds, county or state employees and other quasi governmental entities

    • Supplement Building Information Sanborn CitySets® database (license required) – Can supplement incomplete U.S. data with

    detailed city-center databases of address and other building attributes. This includes information on all structures in the city centers of the largest U.S. cities.

    Publicly Available Data -- New York City Open Database PLUTO (Primary Land Use Tax Lot Output) has extensive

    land use geographic data at the tax lot level- OpenStreetMap is worldwide and includes roads, trails, cafes, railway stations, etc.- New York Department of Information Technology and Telecommunication (NYC DoITT) has

    a 3-D model of every NYC building present in 2014

    Gaps in data are pricedconservatively

  • 12Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Need to Know Where the Employees Are

    3,320 Deaths 795 Deaths

  • 13Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Event Footprints

    Pandemic FootprintEarth is ~ 57 million sq. mi

    Earthquake10k sq. mi

    TerrorismA couple of city blocks

  • 14Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Work vs Home – 60 Wall Street

    Source: ImpactOnDemand

  • 15Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Work – Home Transform

    Step 1 Step 2

    Step 3 Step 4

  • 16Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Pre-Bind Monitoring on Underwriting DesktopDetermine Aggregation With Existing Book

    Source: ImpactOnDemand

    Potential New Account

    Flexible Shape Drawing and Risk Isolation

    Column Name: Sums InsuredShape Name: Canary Wharf

    No. of Lives 7,821Min: $25,000Max: $2,500,000Avg: $175,845

    Total: $1,375,283,745

  • 17Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    NYC DoITT Visualization

    Source: CESIUM (open source 3D rendering library)

  • 18Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Mapping the Shadows of New York City: Every Building

    Source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/21/upshot/Mapping-the-Shadows-of-New-York-City.html

  • 19Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    February 9, 1996 Docklands Bombing

    Pressure wave from 435kg TNT in 1996 Docklands Bombing

    Source: Impact Forecasting

  • 20Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    February 9, 1996 Docklands Bombing

    Source: Mirrorpix

  • 21Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Agenda

    Section 1 Peril OverviewSection 2 Modeling FrameworkSection 3 Challenges and SolutionsSection 4 Risk Management

  • 22Aon Benfield | Catastrophe Management | Accident, Health and Life TeamProprietary & Confidential

    Life Reinsurance Market

    Risk management techniques, and potential applications to catastrophic risk:

    In all cases, modeling is required to determine which risks to avoid, reduce, reinsure or retain!

    • Not writing specific risks, perhaps due to capacity limits

    Avoidance

    • Writing reduced levels of benefits

    Reduction

    • Catastrophe reinsurance• Group or site specific quota share• Catastrophe bonds

    Sharing

    • Keep the good risks and remove the bad risks

    Retention

    Cover pageMoranTam