september 15, 1999 howard rosenbaum [email protected] internet access: regular, filtered, or...
TRANSCRIPT
September 15, 1999Howard Rosenbaum
Internet Access: Internet Access: Regular, Filtered, or Menthol?Regular, Filtered, or Menthol?Internet Access: Internet Access:
Regular, Filtered, or Menthol?Regular, Filtered, or Menthol?
http://www.slis.indiana.edu/hrosenba/www/Pres/filt99/index.html
Filtering the net
9.15.99
I. Introduction
• The problem: access to networked information
II. Possible solutions
• Legislative
• Social
III. Technical: filters
• What are they?
• How do they work?
• How well do they work?
IV. Conclusions
Filtering the net
9.15.99
I. The problem
Controlling access to networked information
Schools and libraries are in the business of providing access to information
Internet access raises difficult issues
Should there be any restrictions on user access?
Does the teacher or librarian have any responsibility to monitor children’s use of this resource?
Is net access be treated as a collection development task?
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Can and should the Internet be censored by filtering is a question bedeviling thousands of public librarians who have rushed to embrace this seemingly limitless and economical information source only to find that it includes a distinctly dark and dirty side.
Bastian, J.B. (1998). Filtering the Internet in American Public Libraries: Sliding Down the Slippery Slope. First Monday 2(10)
http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2_10/bastian/
Filtering the net
9.15.99
How bad can it be?
11/98: ~60,000 “adult” sites in the US
The most frequently used keywords in web searches were sex-related
A Family PC Magazine survey (n=750, 1/98) found that 68% of parents are concerned about children's access to pornography
This does not take intoaccount all of the othertypes of sites from which kids should be protected
http://www-cse.stanford.edu/classes/ cs201/projects/online-pornography/index.html#graph
Filtering the net
9.15.99
A scenario
At a library or school Board meeting, a coalition of parents makes a strong case that the library or school should not be in the pornography business
Free and open access to the net with children allowed to use the computers means that librarians and teachers are no better than the smut dealers
They demand that filtering software be installed on all net-accessible computers that can be used by children
The Board asks you to respond - what do you say?
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Or:
A parent asks to see your collection development policy
They notice what the library or school will and will not buy
They sit at the nearest computer terminal and access versions of the unacceptable material on the net
They call you over and ask you to explain why it is that they (or their child) are can access this information with the library or school’s computer, but can’t find it on the shelves
How do you respond?
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Filtering…NO!
WHEREAS,On June 26, 1997, the US Supreme Court issued a sweeping re-affirmation of core First Amendment principles and held that communications over the Internet deserve the highest level of Constitutional protection...
...
RESOLVED, That the American Library Association affirms that the use of filtering software by libraries to block access to constitutionally protected speech violates the Library Bill of Rights
ALA's Resolution on the Use of Filtering Software in Libraries [Adopted July, 2, 1997]
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Filtering…YES!
Filtering Facts promotes the use of filtering in libraries to protect children from the harms of pornography.
All public libraries should filter the access of children. Filtering for adults should be decided on a community-by-community basis
Goals of Filtering Facts:
Educate the public and media about Internet software filters
Encourage libraries to adopt filters
Persuade the ALA to rescind its “Resolution on the use of filtering software in libraries,” and adopt a more tolerant view of filtering
http://www.filteringfacts.org/faq.htm
Filtering the net
9.15.99
I. Introduction
• The problem: access to networked information
II. Possible solutions
• Legislative
• Social
III. Technical: filters
• What are they?
• How do they work?
• How well do they work?
IV. Conclusions
Filtering the net
9.15.99
II. Possible solutions
Legislative
Indiana House Bill #2069
Current Status: first reading; referred to Committee on Education
If you (the school or public library) want your share of the money and provide a “public access computer” that minors can use, you must:
Use software that limits the ability minors to access materials determined to be inappropriate for them
Purchase net connectivity from an ISP that uses filtering to limit access to materials determined to be inappropriate for minors
Filtering the net
9.15.99
At least once a year, the governing body of the school corporation or library shall hold a public meeting during which
They will determine the range of materials considered inappropriate for minors
This will allow the filters used by the school to be set to prevent a minors from gaining access to the materials
This determination should reflect community standards regarding materials that are inappropriate for minors as evidenced during the meeting
Filtering the net
9.15.99
A “public access computer” is defined as a computer that is
Located in a public school or public library
Frequently or regularly used directly by a minor; and
Connected to any computer communication system
Is this a reasonable definition?
Filtering the net
9.15.99
S. 97: Childrens’ Internet Protection Act
Requirement for schools and libraries to implement filtering or blocking technology for computers with internet access as condition of universal service discounts
The school, school board, or other authority must certify that it
Has selected a technology for its computers with net access to filter or block access to:
Material that is obscene; and
Child pornography; and
Is enforcing a policy to ensure the operation of the technology during any use of such computers by minors
Filtering the net
9.15.99
H.R. 543, 896: Children’s Internet Protection Act
To be eligible for universal service assistance schools and and libraries must certify that they have
Selected technology for computers with net access to filter or block material deemed to be harmful to minors; and
Installed, or will install, and uses or will use, as soon as it obtains computers with Internet access, a technology to filter or block such material
Filtering the net
9.15.99
3) Certification for libraries-
A library with more than 1 computer with net access used by the public (including minors) shall certify that it has installed and uses filtering or blocking to restrict material deemed to be harmful to minors on one or more of its computers with Internet access
A library with 1 computer with net access used by the public (including minors) can receive universal service assistance even if it does not use a filtering or blocking software
It must certify to that it employs a reasonably effective alternative to keep minors from accessing material on the net that is deemed to be harmful
Filtering the net
9.15.99
S. 1545: Neighborhood Children’s Internet Protection Act
No universal service for schools or libraries that fail to filtering or adopt internet use policies
The internet use policy must address minors’
Access to inappropriate matter on the net/web;
Safety and security when using email, chat rooms, and other direct electronic communications;
Unauthorized access, (hacking) and other unlawful activities;
Unauthorized disclosure, use, and dissemination of their personal identification information; and
It also must the use of technological means to limit, monitor, or otherwise control or guide minors’ net access
Filtering the net
9.15.99
H.R. 543, 896
A bill to require the installation and use by schools and libraries of a technology for filtering or blocking material on the Internet on computers with Internet access to be eligible to receive or retain universal service assistance; to the Committee on Commerce
H.R. 368
A bill to require the installation of a system for filtering or blocking matter on the Internet on computers in schools and libraries with Internet access, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Commerce
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Social
Do nothing
Wait and:
Get sued to install filters
Get sued to prevent filters from being installed
Develop a strong internet AUP
Require parental consent
Ask patrons to regulate their own activities
Install filtering on all net computers
Install limited filtering
Move computers and/or use privacy screens
Refuse to install filtering
Filtering the net
9.15.99
What librarians want:
Freedom of choice
Web management software should allow people to choose for themselves and with their children what they wish to view
Guided search
It should guide users to quality sites
Librarians should know the criteria used for site selection and who is doing the selection
Data quality
If a library uses filters, the software should allow librarians to review blocked sites
It should provide a mechanism to notify the company when sites are blocked inappropriately
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Privacy
The software should clear the screen after each use
Users should not be able to not know what previous users have viewed (health information is a particular concern)
Ease of use
The software should be multi-functional, easy to administer and integrate well with existing products
March 12, 1999 meeting of librarians and filtering companies at ALA in Chicago
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Another social solution comes from industry
There are several self-regulation initiatives
Web site owners will require verification or will label their own sites
Internet Content Summithttp://www.stiftung.bertelsmann.de/internetcontent/english/frameset_home.htm
Standards
These solutions are largely voluntary and involve a considerable degree of sophistication on the part of the user to work
PICS (Platform for Internet Content Selection)
P3P (Platform for Privacy Preferences)
Filtering the net
9.15.99
The Internet Content Rating Association was formed in April 1999 as an independent, non-profit organization
Its mission is to develop, implement and manage an internationally acceptable voluntary self-rating system which provides net users world wide with the choice to limit access to content they consider harmful, especially to children
The Recreational Software Advisory Council has formally folded into ICRA which now manages and operates the RSACi rating systemhttp://www.icra.org
Filtering the net
9.15.99
The Recreational Software Advisory Council is a non-profit based in Washington, D.C
It empowers the public (parents) to make informed decisions about electronic media using an open, objective, content advisory system
The RSACi system provides consumers with information about the level of sex, nudity, violence, offensive language (vulgar or hate-motivated) in software games and Web sites
RSACi has been integrated into browsers and Cyber Patrol
CompuServe (US and Europe) has also committed to rate all its content with the RSACi system
http://www.rsac.org/homepage.asp
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Content
Parent selects rating method
Child using the net
Label reading software
Service A label
Service B label
Publisher’s label
How PICS works
http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/PICS/iacwcv2.htm
Filtering the net
9.15.99
P3P: web sites express their privacy practices and users exercise preferences based on those practices
Users to be informed of site practices when they access the site
They can delegate decisions to their computer when possible
They can tailor their relationship to specific sites
Sites with practices that fall within the range of a user's preference can be accessed seamlessly
If the site is outside the range, users are notified of a site’s practices
They can agree to those terms or other terms and continue browsing or leave
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Click on a link
Site sends P3P dataCheck them against your P3P data
If OK, accept page
If not OK, negotiate
If OK, accept page, if not, leave
How P3P works
You set P3P preferences
The site sets its P3P preferences
Request a page
Filtering the net
9.15.99
I. Introduction
• The problem: access to networked information
II. Possible solutions
• Legislative
• Social
III. Technical: filters
• What are they?
• How do they work?
• How well do they work?
IV. Conclusions
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Filters:
“are mechanical tools wrapped around subjective judgment.”
Schneider, K. (1998). Internet Filter Assessment Project
http://www.bluehighways.com/tifap/
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Technical
Hardware
These solutions are built into the machine and are designed to work without user intervention
Clipper chip
Vchip
Machine ID#
Software
Filtering and blocking
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Why are you filtering?
What types of materials will be blocked?
Where will the software be located?
Who will make the decisions and control the software?
When will the filters be turned on?
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Filtering software works by controls access to the net
It allows access to a restricted subset of the net
They can be placed on clients, on the LAN, or on a proxy server
The net
LAN
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Simple filters block URLs
Complex filters check all on-line activities
Advanced filters can block access to web sites, chat rooms, e-mail, file downloading, general browsing, newsgroups
This can be based on addresses, protocols, file types, and text
They can log time spent browsing and keep records of online activity and some offline computing
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Submit URL
Filter reviews request
Is this site allowed?
Yes No
See page See denial page
For this user? At this time? This type of site? This type of file?
The filtering process
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Companies compete on the size and quality of their databases which are compiled in a variety of ways
Inhouse, outsourced, or solicitation from clients
They compete on the ability of their products to withstand assault and hacking
Most contain an encrypted database of “objectionable” locations
Only company producing the software knows exactly what is blocked and what isn’t
They decide what content is “bad” and what is “acceptable”
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Types of databases
Blacklists: these files list all sites that are blocked
A site is brought to the attention of the company, examined and compared to a list of criteria
Offending sites are placed into one or more categories, (profanity, full nudity, drug use, violence…)
These categories differ among filtering products
Most commercial filter vendors do not publish their blacklists
Most users never see the full list of pages that are blocked
Some products now allow limited editing of the list
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Keyword blocking: software developers (or others) come up with a list of objectionable terms
A page can’t load if it contains any word in the stop list (or it will load with the ________ blocked)
Current commercial products do not handle exceptions where otherwise acceptable pages are blocked because of a word that appears on the stop list
Breast cancer, sexually transmitted diseases
The problem is that keywords have no context
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Whitelists: these are similar to blacklists except they comprise a list of pages that can be seen
The developers gather a list of “appropriate” sites
All others are blocked
A whitelist provides a very limited view of the net
However, it is almost 100% effective in blocking all pornography and other offensive material
Whitelists are typically not published
Some products allow the customer to add or delete certain sites
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Examples:
Cyberpatrol ($30.00 + $30.00/yr for updates)
It provides parents, teachers, day care professionals - anyone who is responsible for children's access to the net - with the tools they will need to get a handle on an area which can be very dangerous for kids.
CyberNOT block list - researched sites containing material parents may find questionable
This list is twice as comprehensive as competitive lists, blocking OVER 15,000 Internet resources!
CyberYES allowed sites list - 40,000+ researched sites containing only appropriate material for children
http://www.cyberpatrol.com
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Net Nanny ($26-200.00 - 20 users)
Does Net Nanny allow parents full discretion over what is blocked?
Net Nanny's screening lists are completely user-defined and allow parents to screen and block any words, phrases, sites and content according to their particular values - not a developer's arbitrary selection or the Government's!
Does Net Nanny provide any site lists?
We provide Net Nanny users with site lists, researched by our staff and other 3rd party children’s advocacy groups but they are fully editable
They are always free and downloadable from our web site
http://www.netnanny.com/
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Surfwatch claims to be the leading brand of client and server content filtering products ($40-50.00)
It provides your institution with a powerful and easy to implement solution to protect students from exposure to objectionable or harmful content on the net
Using powerful filtering technology, it blocks access to more than 100,000 explicit sex, violence, drug, and gambling sites, including chat and FTP sites
SurfWatch's NEW Educational Edition features “Secure Learning categories”, starting students off with access to only respected educational sites such asYahooligans!, Children's Television Workshop, and others
http://www.surfwatch.com/
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Library Safe Internet System
It is built for the library and the classroom environment
LibrarySafe allows the librarian and teacher “Total Empowerment” in deciding which web sites should be blocked on which computer terminals, and at what time
Is LibrarySafe 100% tamper-proof?
Yes. Since the software is located at the network-level, only authorized personal have access to the filter
Patrons cannot tamper with ithttp://ww.librarysafe.com
Filtering the net
9.15.99
How can a library system implement its unique filtering policy using LibrarySafe?
LibrarySafe allows the library its own "Private Internet Filter" to give you the EMPOWERMENT to decide what sites will be filtered, where they will be filtered, and when they will be filtered.
Your staff can design their own list of sites to be blocked or allowed
LibrarySafe has a special web page (which only an authorized person has access) where you are able to add and delete those URLs you have decided are appropriate or inappropriate
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Bess www.n2h2.com
Cyber Sitter www.solidoak.com
Cyber Patrol www.cyberpatrol.com
Cyber Snoop www.pearlsw.com
CyberLibrary www.jdltech.com
EdView www.edview.com
I-Gear www.urlabs.com
The Library Channel www.vimpact.net
Net Nanny www.netnanny.com
Net Shepherd www.shepherd.com
Smart Filter www.smartfilter.com
Surfwatch www.surfwatch.com
WebSense www.websense.com
X-Stop www.xstop.com
Filtering and blocking software
http://www.ala.org/symons/filtering/filterlist.html
Filtering the net
9.15.99
How well do they work?
Smartfilter was used in Utah public libraries and schools by the state educational network (UEN)
It uses 27 categories, any or all of which can be activated
UEN uses five: sex, gambling, criminal skills, hate speech, drugs
It has no access to Smartfilter's blacklist, does not make additions to it and makes very few removals
The Secure Computing Corp, San Jose makes the decisions as to what Utah students, adults and library patrons can view over the nethttp://censorware.org/reports/utah/methodology.shtml
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Time Period Total Accesses Total Banned
20 days 53,103,387 205,737
20 days (no banners 15,434,442 (.62%) 95,059 (.56%) or images)
Sex Drugs Hate Criminal skills Gambling
193,272 1,588 791 4,934 5,772
86,957 1,298 526 3,753 3,649
A small percentage of sites are blocked:
But some interesting sites were among those banned!
Filtering the net
9.15.99
All about oil exploration http://www.pollution.com/
Computer game reviewshttp://www.kickass.com/
Shakespeare’s Tragedieshttp://wiretap.spies.com/ftp.items/Library/Classic/Shakespeare/Tragedies/
Mr. Science (things that go “boom”)http://www2.southwind.net/~mrscienc/boom.html
HateWatch (anti-hate speech site)http://www.hatewatch.org/frames.html
Bloomington Brewing Companyhttp://bbc.bloomington.com/brewing.html
The Starr report http://www.abcnews.com/report/2toc.htm
Filtering the net
9.15.99
Some resources used in this talk:
The Internet Filter Assessment Project http://www.bluehighways.com/tifap/
IFAP: Internet Access Management Options http://www.bluehighways.com/filters/options.html
Filtering Facts http://www.filteringfacts.org/
Censorware.org http://www.censorware.org/reports/utah/
W3C PICS http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/PICS/iacwcv2.htm
FCC: Parents, Kids & Communications http://www.fcc.gov/parents_information/#browsing
This presentation will be on the web at: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/hrosenba/www/Pres/filt99/index.html