seminar 2 - part 2 ans

Upload: analslutty

Post on 02-Nov-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • N1B405 MAD II Seminar 2 Part 2 Process Costing

    1

    Indicative Answers

    Question 1 MASChips

    Given:

    Direct mat: 100% converted at start of process.

    Conversion costs: added evenly during process.

    Normal Losses:

    15% of good units transferred out. Lost at 100% completion stage, Closing WIP will not share the cost! Cost of normal loss to be borne by expected output: (1) units transferred out and (2) abnormal

    Loss

    Weighted average method used

    Units

    Opening WIP 400

    Started 1,700

    2,100

    Transferred Out 1,400

    Normal Losses [15%*1400] 210

    Abnormal Losses [Bal fig] 190

    Closing WIP 300

    2,100

    (a) Equivalent Units

    Physical units Material

    Conversion

    Transfer out 1,400 [100%] 1,400 [100%] 1,400

    Normal Losses 210 [100%] 210 [100%] 210

    Abnormal Losses 190 [100%] 190 [100%] 190

    Closing WIP 300 [100%] 300 [40%] 120

    Total 2,100 2,100 1,920

    (b) Cost per Equivalent Unit

    Material Conversion Total

    Costs () 442,000 163,800 605,800

    Cost per Equivalent

    Unit ()

    210.4762 85.3125

    (c) Cost assignments

    Material

    Conversion Total

    Transfer out () 294,667 119,438 [+54,693] 468,798#

    Normal Losses () 44,200 17,916

    Abnormal Losses () 39,990 16,209 [+7,423] 63,622#

    Closing WIP 63,143 10,237 73,380

    Total () 442,000 163,800 605,800

    Note: #Cost of NL 62,116 should be borne by the expected output units (i.e. the transferred out

    units and abnormal loss), normally using the units as the distribution factor!

  • N1B405 MAD II Seminar 2 Part 2 Process Costing

    2

    Question 2 UBS Sdn Bhd

    (a) Units to be accounted for: 10,000kg

    Units accounted for: 8,000kg transferred out

    900kg closing WIP

    1,000kg normal loss

    100kg abnormal loss [bal fig]

    10,000kg

    Since losses occur at 100% completion stage Closing WIP will not share the cost! Cost of normal loss to be borne by expected output: (1) units transferred out and (2) abnormal Loss

    Process cost per unit for the Binding Process in the month:

    Material costs Conversion costs

    +

    Equivalent units for material Equivalent units for conversion

    RM40,500 RM8,424

    = + 8,000+(900*100%)+(1,000*100%)+(100*100%) 8,000+(900*75%)+(1,000*100%)+(100*100%)

    = RM4.05 + RM0.8618

    = RM4.9118

    Cost of NL = RM4.9118*1,000kg = RM4911.8 to be spread over the expected output of 8100kg,

    i.e. RM0.6064 per unit of expected output

    Thus, the process cost per unit is effectively RM4.9118+RM0.6064=RM5.5182

    (b) The value of closing work-in-progress carried forward on the Binding :

    (RM4.05*900kg*100%) + (RM0.8618*900kg*75%) = RM4,226.715

    Question 3

    Explain the accounting treatments for production losses and explain how such treatment should

    reflect the responsibility accounting practice. Specifically, explain that the cost of normal losses may

    be adjusted with additional disposal costs and/or scrap value relating to such losses. The adjusted

    cost is to be borne by the expected output units. The closing work-in-process would also need to

    bear a portion of this cost if it has passed the stage of loss. As for the abnormal losses, explain that

    this should be assigned with a portion of the production cost and be disclosed separately in the

    management reports. The cost of abnormal loss may be adjusted with disposal costs and/or scrap

    value of such loss.

    Question 4

    Refer chapter reading.

    Question 5

    Explain how the sharing of joint costs amongst the main products may help to value closing stock at

    the end of each accounting period, to determine profit, as well for profitability analysis and perhaps

    cost-based pricing decisions. Answer should stress that joint cost apportionment should not be

    referred when arriving on decisions on further processing.

    Question 6

    Explain the meaning of joint products and by-products, why and how management should attempt to

    treat these products when dealing with the joint process costs (by applying the materiality concept),

    how such different treatments impact upon the profitability analysis of these products. Answer must

    describe the costing treatment for joint products (sharing of joint costs using the various available

    methods) and for by-products (not bearing any of the joint costs but need to account for any further

    costs and/or scrap value).