self study workshop plenary v self study report considerations philosophy and tone february 2, 2007...
TRANSCRIPT
Self Study Workshop
Plenary V
Self Study Report Considerations
Philosophy and Tone
February 2, 2007 Sonya Christian
Tone
Is NotIs
Academic
Rigorous
Factual
Evidence based
Meticulous
Pedantic
Boring
Sterile
Anecdotal
Fussy
Self-study
Your Story
Your Values
AccreditationStandards
Self-study
“Both”“And”
An Example
Lane’s Story
Learning-centered principles
Core values
Initial Work: An Example
4.A.5 The institution provides for regular and systematic evaluation of faculty performance in order to ensure teaching effectiveness and the fulfillment of instructional and other faculty responsibilities. The institution's policies, regulations, and procedures provide for the evaluation of all faculty on a continuing basis consistent with Policy 4.1 - Faculty Evaluation, page 66.
Eval Scale: 3—Strong Compliance to 0—No Compliance
Evidence:What evidence/ data do we have?
What data do we need to collect? Indica
tor based
with
one-to-one m
apping.
AnalysisWhat conclusions should we draw from the evidence?What is the data telling us about how well we are doing in relation to our embedded College Values: the Learning-centered College principles, as well as the College’s Vision, Mission & Core Values?
Strengths (Provide Examples):
Challenges (Provide Examples):
Recommendations for Improvement - Alignment to Vision, Mission, Core Values, Learning CollegeWhat are we going to do as a result of this analysis to improve our practice?
Initial Work: An ExampleIndicator based with one-to-one mapping.
It is your story …Collective Story
All the groups have their roles
Self-Improvement
Leads to improving every aspect of the institution
… and not merely to respond to NWCCU