· security forces, besides drone attacks, incidents of ethno-political violence, and attacks with...
TRANSCRIPT
Conflict and Peace Studies
VOLUME 12 Jan - June 2020 NUMBER 1
PAKISTAN SECURITY REPORT
2019
PAK INSTITUTE FOR PEACE STUDIES (PIPS)
A PIPS Research Journal
Conflict and Peace Studies
Copyright © PIPS 2020
All Rights Reserved
No part of this journal may be reproduced in any form by photocopying or by any
electronic or mechanical means, including information storage or retrieval systems,
without prior permission in writing from the publisher of this journal.
Editorial Advisory Board
Khaled Ahmed Consulting Editor, The Friday Times, Lahore, Pakistan.
Dr. Muhammad Khalid Masud Former Chairman of the Council of Islamic Ideology in Pakistan.
Prof. Dr. Saeed Shafqat Director, Centre for Public Policy and Governance, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Dr. Catarina Kinnvall Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden.
Marco Mezzera Senior Adviser, Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre / Norsk Ressurssenter for Fredsbygging, Norway.
Dr. Adam Dolnik Professor of Counterterrorism, George C.
Marshall European Center for Security Studies, Germany.
Prof. Dr. Syed Farooq Hasnat Pakistan Study Centre, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Tahir Abbas Professor of Sociology, Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Anatol Lieven Professor, Department of War Studies, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Rasul Bakhsh Rais Professor, Political Science, Lahore University of Management Sciences Lahore, Pakistan.
Peter Bergen Senior Fellow, New American Foundation, Washington D.C., USA.
Dr. Tariq Rahman Dean, School of Education, Beaconhouse National University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Pak Institute for Peace Studies (PIPS)
Post Box No. 2110,
Islamabad, Pakistan +92-51-8359475-6
www.pakpips.com,
ISSN 2072-0408 Price: Rs 1000.00
US$ 30.00
The views expressed are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect any positions
held by the institute.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword 11
1 Overview of Security in 2019: Critical
Challenges and Recommendations
Muhammad Amir Rana and Safdar Sial 15
2 Security Landscape of Pakistan in 2019
Safdar Sial 33
3 Militant landscape of Pakistan in 2019
Muhammad Amir Rana 65
4 State Responses
Safdar Sial 75
5 Profile: Militant Landscape of Balochistan
Muhammad Amir Rana 85
6 The Wave of Suicide Bombing in Pakistan
(2007 to 2011) Umer Farooq
101
7 CPEC Security in 2019
Anam Fatima 115
8 2019: Faith-based Violence and Other Incidence
Najam U Din
121
9 The Baloch Insurgency in 2019
Muhammad Akbar Notezai
127
Annexures 143
Timelines 161
LIST OF ACRONYMS
AJK: Azad Jammu and Kashmir
ANP: Awami National Party
AQIS: Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent
Arm: Army
ASWJ: Ahl-e-Sunnat Wal Jamaat
ATC: Anti-Terrorism Courts
ATF: Anti-Terrorism Force
BAP: Balochistan Awami Party BC: Balochistan Constabulary
BH: Beheading
BLA: Balochistan Liberation Army
BLF: Balochistan Liberation Front
BNP: Balochistan National Party
BNP-M: Balochistan National Party-Mengal Group
BRA: Baloch Republican Army
BSF: [Indian] Border Security Force
BT: Bomb Blast
CIA: Central Intelligence Agency
CID: Criminal Investigation Department
Civ: Civilians
CPEC: China-Pakistan Economic Corridor
CTDs: Counter Terrorism Departments [of police]
CVE: Counter Violent Extremism
DGMOs: Director Generals of Military Operations
DSP: Deputy Superintendent Police
FATF: Financial Action Task Force
FC: Frontier Corps
FCR: Frontier Crimes Regulation
FIA: Federal Investigative Agency
Fr: Firing
HG: Hand Grenade
HRCP: Human Rights Commission of Pakistan
HuA: Hizbul Ahrar
IDP: Internally Displaced Persons
IED: Improvised Explosive Device
ISI: Inter-Services Intelligence
ISIS: Islamic State in Iraq and Syria
IS-K: Islamic State Khorasan
ISO: Imamia Student Organization
ISPR: Inter-Services Public Relations
JI: Jamaat-e-Islami
JID: Joint Intelligence Directorate
JM: Jaish-e-Muhammad
JuA: Jamaatul Ahrar
JuD: Jamaatud Dawa
JUI-F: Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl
Kid: Kidnapping
KP: Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa
LeJ: Lashkar-e-Jhangvi
LeJ-A: Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Al-Alami
LI: Lashkar-e-Islam
LM: Landmine Blast
LoC: Line of Control
Lvs: Levies Force
MDM: Muttahida Deeni Mahaz
Mil: Militant
MQM: Muttahida Qaumi Movement
MWM: Majlis Wahdatul Muslimeen
NACTA: National Counter-Terrorism Authority
NADRA: National Database and Registration Authority
NAP: National Action Plan
NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization
NEC: National Executive Committee
NIC: National Implementation Committee [on FATA reforms]
NP: National Party
NPP: National People’s Party
NSA: National Security Advisor
PkMAP: Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party
P-ml: Paramilitary Forces
6
PML-N: Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz
Pol: Police
PPP: Pakistan People’s Party
PTI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf
PTM: Pakhtun Tahafuz Movement QWP: Qaumi Watan Party
RA: Rocket Attack
RCB: Remote-controlled Bomb
Rng: Rangers
SA: Suicide Attack
Sab: Sabotage
SDLF/A: Sindhu Desh Liberation Front/Army
SDRA: Sindhu Desh Revolution Army
SECP: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
Sect: Sectarian
SM: Sipah-e-Muhammad
SP: Superintendent of Police
SSP: Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan
ST: Sunni Tehreek
TA: Terrorist Attack
TLP: Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan
TNSM: Tehreek-e-Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi
TTP: Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan
UBA: United Baloch Army
UN: United Nations
WB: Working Boundary
METHODOLOGY AND VARIABLES
The PIPS conflict/security database and archives are the basic sources relied upon for
this report. The archives and the database are the outcome of a meticulous monitoring
process on every relevant incident in the country on a daily basis. A regular follow up is
conducted in liaison with PIPS correspondents in the regions in order to keep track of
daily developments on such incidents. PIPS compiles data from sources including
newspapers, magazines, journals, field sources and screening of official record. More
than 30 English and Urdu dailies, magazines, and journals, and various television news
channels are monitored to update the database and archives. Regional daily newspapers
and weeklies from Peshawar, Quetta, Gilgit and Karachi are also monitored for details of
incidents reported in the local media. Correspondents in provincial capitals are the
primary source for PIPS to verify the media reports. In case of a major incident, PIPS
teams consult the local administration and journalists for further details. In cases where
PIPS finds it difficult to verify facts of a particular incident, it gives preference to the
official statements in that regard.
PIPS security reports utilize eight major variables with their respective set of sub-
variables for analysis of the security situation in Pakistan. The security landscape is
mapped through a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative
methods are used, based on PIPS Conflict and Security Database, to measure the scale
and level of violence. Meanwhile, the qualitative approach dilates upon changes and
developments on the militants’ front, state responses to these developments and
projections of future scenarios. The following eight major variables with their sub-sets of
variable are used in the PIPS Security Reports:
1. Attacks: This major variable has a sub-set of five sub-variables i.e. (i) terrorist
attacks including militant attacks, nationalist insurgent attacks and sectarian-related
attacks; (ii) incidents of ethno-political violence; (iii) cross-border attacks; (iv) drone
attacks; and (v) operational attacks by security forces against militants. Since
Pakistan’s security landscape is very complicated with a diverse array of insecurity
indicators in different parts of the country, the type of violence in one geographical
unit is often different in its nature and dynamics from security landscape in other
parts of the country. For this purpose, the mentioned sub-set of variables is carefully
monitored and analyzed in the security report with a view to suggest specific
counter-strategy for each type of attack in these areas.
2. Clash: Another variable used is of clashes which include four sub-variables, i.e., (i)
inter-tribal; (ii) sectarian; (iii) clashes between security forces and militants; and (iv)
militants’ infightings. The number of such clashes and their geographic location is
8
taken as an indicator of parallel trends unfolding simultaneously with major trends and
patterns of security in different areas of the country.
3. State Reponses: It has two sub-variables: (i) security measures, and (ii) political
and administrative responses. The first takes into account the security forces’
operational attacks and clashes with militants, search and hunt operations and
terrorists’ arrests, etc. The second variable entails the government’s political and
administrative measures to maintain law and order and reduce insecurity and
violence.
4. Casualties: Casualties include both the number of people killed and injured.
Casualties among civilians, militants and security forces are treated as another
indicator to measure the levels and trends of security in the country.
5. Attack Tactics: This head takes a comprehensive account of various tactics used by
different actors including suicide attacks, missile attacks, hand grenade attacks,
kidnappings, rocket attacks, beheadings, landmine blasts, firing, sabotage, target
killings, and bomb and improvised explosive devices blasts.
6. Development on Militants’ Front: This variable analyzes statements, activities,
internal divisions and other activities of militants to determine their strength and the
dynamics of their strategies.
7. Opportunities and Challenges include political measures and military responses
to different security issues along with highlighting constraints and challenges
encountered by the state.
8. Claim of Responsibility: It provides insight into militants’ targets, tactics, areas of
operation, and agendas.
GLOSSARY
Military Operation: Large-scale operations launched by military and paramilitary forces
against Islamist militants and separatist insurgents in KP, FATA and Balochistan to
preserve law and order and the writ of the state.
Operational Attack: Pre-emptive attacks launched by military and paramilitary troops to
purge an area of militants.
Clashes between Security Forces and Militants: Armed clashes between security
forces and militants, triggered by militants’ attack on security check posts/ convoys and
confrontation during search operations.
Terrorist Attacks: Include militant, nationalist, insurgent and sectarian attacks.
Indiscriminate use of violence by militant outfits such as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan
(TTP), Lashkar-e-Islam (LI) and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) etc., manifested through suicide
attacks, beheadings and destruction of educational institutions, CD/video shops, etc.
Nationalist Insurgent Attacks: Attacks by separatists/nationalist insurgents mainly in
Balochistan and interior parts of Sindh.
Sectarian Attacks: Indiscriminate use of violence rooted in differences among various
Islamic schools of thought over interpretation of religious commands. Incidents involving
indiscriminate use of violence perpetrated by banned sectarian outfits such as LeJ,
Tehreek-e-Jafria, Imamia Student Organization (ISO), Sipah-e-Muhammad, etc., against
rival schools of religious thought.
Ethno-political Violence: The threat or use of violence, often against the civilian
population, to achieve political or social ends, to intimidate opponents, or to publicize
grievances.
Inter-tribal Clash: Clashes or feuds reported between tribes, mainly in Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan, rural areas of Punjab and parts of interior Sindh.
Search and Hunt Operation: Launched by law enforcement agencies on intelligence to
capture militants or to purge a particular locality of suspected militants and their
hideouts.
Sectarian Clashes: Violent clashes between armed factions of banned sectarian outfits
or between followers of rival sects such as Sunni-Shia, Deobandi-Barelvi strife. Sectarian
clashes also include tribal feuds between followers of Sunni and Shia schools of thought
10
as in Kurram, where once the Sunni Turi tribesmen frequently clashed with members of
the Shia Bangash tribe.
Overall Number of Attacks: The sum of militant and counter-militant attacks by the
security forces, besides drone attacks, incidents of ethno-political violence, and attacks
with sectarian motives or by nationalist insurgents.
Plot/Unsuccessful Attempts: These include attempts at terrorist attacks that were
either foiled by security forces and bomb disposal squads, or explosives went off by
accident before militants or suicide bombers reached their intended target.
FOREWORD
In 2019, Pakistan witnessed a further decline in the number of terrorist incidents and
consequent casualties. The statistics of Pakistan Security Report 2019 show that terrorist
attacks this year decreased by around 13 percent as compared to 2018, and the number
of people killed in these attacks plummeted by 40pc. Indeed, there has been a gradual
decrease in terrorist attacks and casualties since 2009 (with the exception of 2013, when
a surge in sectarian violence mainly contributed to a rise in attacks and casualties).
Continuous anti-militant operational and surveillance campaigns by security forces and
police counterterrorism departments, as well as some counter-extremism actions taken
under the National Action Plan, have apparently helped sustain that declining trend 2013
onwards. However, these plummeting numbers do not suggest, in any way, that the
threat of terrorism has been completely eliminated. Certainly, most terrorist groups have
been weakened but they are still present in physical and virtual spaces.
Despite an overall decrease in terrorist incidents in the country, such reported incidents
from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa remained unchanged from previous year. Indeed, North
Waziristan remerged as a major hotspot of such violence where over 42 percent of the
total 125 reported attacks from KP concentrated. The problem of a lax state response to
the security challenge of KP is partly linked to continuing slow transition of
implementation of erstwhile FATA’s merger in KP, mainly due to multiple bureaucratic,
political and legal hurdles, which need to be addressed immediately.
During the year under review, curbing terrorism financing remained the most critical
policy challenge for Pakistan, which the country is still struggling to address. Apart from
having security implications, it has also started negatively impacting the financial sector
of the country with long-term economic consequences. The Financial Action Task Force
(FATF) had put Pakistan on its grey list in June 2018 with the caution that if deficiencies
in curbing terrorism financing were not removed in one year’s time, Pakistan would have
to face consequences of getting on the FATF blacklist. A FATF meeting in Paris in
October 2019 reviewed the measures Islamabad in that regard and noted that the
country will have to do more to come out of the grey list. The FATF’s comments on
Pakistan’s last compliance report, which was submitted on December 3rd2019, were not
cheery either. Instead of following a tactical approach to merely respond to the FATF
queries, Pakistan instead will have to develop some institutional responses to curb the
terror financing.
Pakistan’s internal security landscape is complicated due to both internal and external
threats. The post-Pulwama situation has complicated Pakistan’s strategic challenge on its
12
eastern side, which was further fueled by the controversial revocation of the special
status of India-held Kashmir by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s BJP government. The
situation has diverted the attention of the state institutions towards its core conventional
security threat. The Pakistan-Afghanistan border security situation is also very delicate,
but border security issues with Iran are becoming complicated too, as Baloch insurgents
are reportedly using Iranian soil to hide.
The internal security dimension not only includes threats from hardcore radical and
sectarian terrorist groups but also from groups that promote religious intolerance. The
latter pose a different sort of critical challenge, because such groups can mobilise their
support bases to cause more damage to the economy, social cohesion of society and
global image of the country. An enraged mob in Ghotki town attacked properties worth
millions of rupees and looted several shops belonging to the Hindu community after the
owner of a school was accused of committing blasphemy in September last year.1The
episode was another indication of how blasphemy accusations could trigger a severe and
extensive wave of violence, mainly against minority communities, before some legal
action was taken or evidence produced. Though, Prime Minster Imran Khan has
promised that in ‘naya Pakistan’, terrorist and extremist groups will never be allowed to
thrive, but his government should come up with some action. The first step in this
direction should be to initiate an open debate in parliament on the status and future of
banned groups. Parliament can constitute a high-powered national-level truth and
reconciliation commission, to review the policies that produced militancy and to
mainstream those willing to renounce violence and violent ideologies, but that should
happen within the country’s Constitutional framework.
Another matter, which the Parliament should take up, is the Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement
(PTM), which is, among other manifestations, a reflection of trust deficit between the
security forces and a major segment of the population in tribal districts of KP. The PTM
asserts it is a non-violent social movement seeking to protect the rights of the Pashtun
people and address their grievances mainly in tribal districts. Experts are rightly calling
for the government and parliament to take up the issue of PTM and address it instead of
leaving it to security forces. It is a political issue and government’s indifference may
further drag the security forces into it, who will certainly act to restore peace and
security whenever and wherever needed. That will further unnecessarily pitch the latter
against the PTM and a section of Pashtun people, thus making it difficult for them to
counter militancy and terrorism in tribal districts, which requires an overwhelming public
support.
PIPS has been maintaining in it policy recommendations over last several years that the
security situation in Balochistan needs special attention. In 2019, government has taken
13
several initiatives but Balochistan appeared the most critical area in terms of security
challenges. Both religious and nationalist non-state actors are making security landscape
of the province complicated. To deal with the Baloch insurgency, the government has to
immediately evolve a proper plan for the reintegration and mainstreaming of insurgents.
A realization among the Baloch youth is increasing that through violence nothing can be
achieved and the state has to reciprocate in a similar way. A fast-track mechanism on
missing persons in the province can prove a major confidence-building measure.
As in previous year, the implementation on NAP was not effective in 2019 because of
various reasons. The NAP should be made into a proper plan, with clear goals, a
comprehensive monitoring mechanism, and periodic reviewing. The NAP should adjust
with the changing nature of the threats and it should have been a dynamic and effective
policy tool.
PIPS hopes that this 14th edition of its annual security report would help the
policymakers, academics, media and civil society understand the gravity of the security
situation in Pakistan with a view to moving towards sustainable solutions. This year too,
the report includes more in-depth analysis on critical security issues. Apart from the
comprehensive data on violent incidents, comparative analysis of various security
variables, the changing targets and tactics of militants and nature of state responses, the
report also contains comprehensive review of militant landscape of Balochistan and an in-
depth analysis of suicide attacks in Pakistan between 2007 and 2011.
The credit for this report goes to the entire team at PIPS, particularly Safdar Sial, who
monitored security developments and narrated them for the report and provided
analytical insights on security issues of the country; Ms. Shaqufta Hayat, whose research
support, especially in drawing annexures and timelines, greatly helped the analysis
provided inside; and Shahzad Ahmed, who designed the various conflict maps.
Muhammad Amir Rana
January 4, 2020
CHAPTER 1
Overview of Security in 2019: Critical Challenges and Recommendations
Muhammad Amir Rana and Safdar Sial*
1.1 Overview of Security Situation in 2019 ...............................17
1.2 Critical Challenges and Recommendations ..........................25
• Muhammad Amir Rana is Director of Pak Institute for Peace Studies (PIPS). He has authored several
books, most recently of “The Militant: Development of a Jihadi character in Pakistan”, which won the
German Peace Prize in 2014.
• Safdar Hussain, nom de plume Safdar Sial, is Joint Director at PIPS and Associate Editor of Conflict and
Peace Studies journal. He has also co-authored “Dynamics of Taliban Insurgency in FATA” and
“Radicalization in Pakistan”.
1.1 Overview of Security
Situation in 2019
As many as 229 terrorist attacks took
place across Pakistan in 2019 – including
four suicide attacks – which is a decrease
of about 13 percent from the year before.
Launched by different militant,
nationalist/insurgent and violent sectarian
groups, these attacks claimed in all 357
lives – a decline of 40 percent from those
killed in such attacks in 2018 – and injured
another 729 people.
So-called religiously inspired militant
groups such as the Tehreek-e-Taliban
Pakistan (TTP), its splinter groups Hizbul
Ahrar and Jamaatul Ahrar, as well as other
militant groups with similar objectives such
as local Taliban groups, Lashkar-e-Islam
and ISIS-affiliates remained active in parts
of the country but most of their activities
remained concentrated in Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces.
In all, these groups perpetrated 158
terrorist attacks – compared to 171 in
previous year – which killed 239 people
and injured 489 others. Meanwhile
nationalist insurgent groups, mainly
Baloch, carried out 57 attacks – as
compared to 80 such attacks in 2018 –
which claimed 80 lives and wounded
another 162 people. Meanwhile, 14 of the
reported terrorist attacks in 2019 were
sectarian-related – two more from the
year before – which killed 38 people and
inflicted injuries on 78 others.
Those 357 killed in terrorist attacks in
Pakistan in 2019 included 164 civilians,
163 personnel of security and law
enforcement agencies (59 army officials;
37 FC men; 53 policemen; and 14 Levies)
and 30 militants, who were either
killed/exploded suicide bombers or those
killed in retaliatory fire by security and law
enforcement personnel following some
attacks. Those injured in terrorist attacks
included 519 civilians, 208 security
personnel and two militants.
Chart 1: Classification of Terrorist
Attacks in Pakistan in 2019
As far as the targets hit by the terrorists
are concerned, a total of 118 attacks, or
about 52 percent of the total terrorist
attacks reported in 2019, hit personnel,
vehicles/convoys and posts of security
forces and law-enforcement agencies
across Pakistan. These attacks targeting
security and law enforcement personnel
also caused the highest number of
casualties (209 killed; 346 injured) for any
one type of target hit in terrorist attacks in
2019. Civilians were the apparent targets
of 39 attacks (over 17 percent of the total
57
158
14
80
239
38
162
489
78
By NationalistInsurgents
By Militants Sectarian-related
No. of Attacks Killed Injured
Pakistan Security Report | 2019
20
attacks), which claimed 34 lives and
injured 123 others. Eleven attacks targeted
Shia community members, mainly Hazaras,
claiming 32 lives; five attacks on Sunni
community members also killed eight
people. Meanwhile, 11 attacks targeted
pro-government tribesmen and peace
committee members, and another nine
attacks hit political leaders and workers.
Other sporadic targets hit by the terrorist
in 2019 are given at Table 1.
Table 1: Targets Hit in Terrorist
Attacks in 2019
Targets
No
. o
f
Att
ack
s
Kil
led
Inju
red
Security forces/law
enforcement agencies 118 209 346
Education/institutions/teachers
2 2 4
Non-Bloch settlers/workers
1 3 1
Gas pipelines 3 0 0
Tribal elders 2 3 3
Civilians 39 34 123
Shia religious scholars/community
11 32 72
Worship places/shrines/imam bargahs
2 9 53
Govt. offices/public property (hospitals, banks etc.)
1 0 10
Sunni religious
leaders/community 5 8 3
Political leaders/workers 9 11 19
NGO / civil society members
1 2 0
Foreign interests/ Diplomats/Foreigners
1 0 0
Unknown 4 3 1
Media/journalists 2 0 3
Health/polio workers, 6 8 1
Targets
No
. o
f
Att
ack
s
Kil
led
Inju
red
security escorts
Pro-Govt. tribesmen/peace
committee members
11 13 47
Bohra community 1 3 4
Judges/lawyers/courts 1 0 2
Former militants 2 3 0
Railway tracks / trains 3 4 30
Member of banned groups 1 2 0
Development, exploration projects, companies,
workers
2 8 6
NATO/US supply vehicles 1 0 1
Total 229 357 729
In perpetrating the reported 229 attacks,
terrorists mainly employed improvised
explosive devices (IEDs) of various types
(123 attacks) and direct firing/shootout
(92 attacks). They also used other attacks
tactics, though less frequently, including
four (4) suicide blasts, five (5) hand
grenade attacks, three (3) rocket attacks,
and two (2) gun and bomb attacks.
As in the year before, the highest number
of terrorist attacks for any one region of
Pakistan was reported from Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa, including merged districts of
erstwhile FATA. A total of 125 reported
attacks from the province claimed 145
lives and inflicted injuries on another 249
people. The TTP, Hizbul Ahrar, local
Taliban and other groups with similar
objectives perpetrated 124 of these
attacks, while one attack was sectarian-
related.
Pakistan Security Report | 2019
21
In 2019, North Waziristan reemerged as a
major flashpoint of insecurity and militant
violence where 53 terrorist attacks took
place, or over 42 percent of the total
reported attacks from KP, which killed 57
people and injured 93 others. Two other
KP districts where more than 10 attacks
happened in the year included DI Khan (14
attacks) and Bajaur (11 attacks) districts.
While seven (7) terrorist attacks happened
in Bannu, the provincial capital Peshawar
and Tank faced six (6) attacks each.
Meanwhile five (5) attacks took place in
each of Mohmand and South Waziristan
districts. In all, terrorist attacks were
recorded in 17 districts of KP.
Though Khyber Pakhtunkhwa faced the
highest number of attacks than any other
region of the country, but in terms of
terrorism-related casualties Balochistan
was the most affected region of the
country in 2019. As many as 171 people
were killed – about 48 percent of the total
357 people killed in terrorist attacks across
Pakistan – and 436 others were injured in
84 reported attacks from the province.
Different Baloch insurgent groups, mainly
the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA),
Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), BRAS –
a newly established alliance of Baloch
insurgent groups mainly including BLA,
BLF and Baloch Republican Guard (BRG) –
Lashkar-e-Balochistan and Baloch
Republican Army (BRA), etc., perpetrated
51 attacks killing 71 people and wounding
162 others. Religiously inspired militant
groups such as the TTP, Hizbul Ahrar,
ISIS-affiliates and some other similar
unknown militants were reportedly
involved in as many as 26 attacks that
caused death to 69 people and injuries to
another 197 people. Meanwhile, seven (7)
sectarian-related attacks claimed 31 lives,
mostly of Hazara Shias, and wounded 77
others.
Terrorist attacks happened in 20 districts
of Balochistan including 22 from provincial
capital Quetta alone, nine (9) from Kech,
eight (8) from Qilla Abdullah, mainly
Chaman, six (6) from Loralai and five (5)
attacks each from Dera Bugti, Nasirabad,
and Panjgur. Two attacks in Gwadar
caused 22 deaths, and three (3) reported
attacks from Ziarat claimed 11 lives.
On the whole, 14 terrorist attacks
happened in Sindh province – 10 in
Karachi alone and 4 in interior Sindh –
which killed a total of 18 people and
injured two (2) others. Six of these attacks
were sectarian-related targeted killings of
Sunni and Shia leaders and community
members, all of which were reported from
Karachi. Meanwhile some unknown
militants, apparently religiously inspired,
carried out four (4) attacks killing eight (8)
people and injuring two (2) others. Sindhi
nationalist group Sindhu desh Liberation
Army (SDLA), Sindhu desh Revolution
Army (SDRA) and a Baloch insurgent
group BLA were involved in another four
(4) attacks reported from Sindh, which
claimed four (4) lives.
Pakistan Security Report | 2019
22
In all, five (5) terrorist attacks took place
in Punjab including two (2) in Lahore, one
in Rawalpindi and two (2) in south
Punjab’s Rahim Yar Khan and Rajanpur
districts. As many as 21 people lost their
lives and 41 others were injured in these
attacks. Hizbul Ahrar, a splinter group of
the TTP, perpetrated three (3) of these
attacks in Lahore and Rawalpindi killing
eight (8) policemen and seven (7) civilians.
Baloch insurgent groups BLA and BRA
were reportedly involved in two attacks
reported from south Punjab, which claimed
five (5) lives.
One attack happened in the federal capital
Islamabad that claimed the lives of two (2)
policemen and injured another. (See Table
2)
Table 2: Terrorist Attacks in Pakistan
in 2019
Region No. of
Attacks Killed Injured
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
125 145 249
Balochistan 84 171 436
Punjab 5 21 41
Karachi 10 14 2
Sindh (excluding Karachi)
4 4 0
Islamabad 1 2 1
Total 229 357 729
1.1.1 Comparison
Apart from the 229 terrorist attacks cited
earlier, incidents of violence of some other
types were also recorded across Pakistan in
2019. These included a combined total of
128 cross-border attacks from India,
Afghanistan and Iran; 28 anti-militant
operational strikes carried out by security
forces and their 25 armed clashes/
encounters with militants; eight (8)
incidents of political/ethnic violence; 12
thwarted/failed terror plots; two (2)
targeted attacks, whose motivation was not
clear; and one clash between protestors
and security forces. (See Table 3) Thus,
when counted together, 432 incidents of
violence of different types – as given at
Table 3 – were reported from across
Pakistan in 2019, which killed a total of 588
people and injured 1,030 others.
Table 3: Nature of Overall Incidents
of Violence
Nature of
Incident
No. of
Incidents Killed Injured
Terrorist
attacks 229 357 729
Political/ethnic
violence 8 6 7
Clashes &
encounters
between
security forces
& militants
25 44 9
Cross-border
clashes/attacks 128 91 245
Operational
attacks by
security forces
28 81 19
Plot/foiled terror attempts
12 3 7
Pakistan Security Report | 2019
23
Nature of
Incident
No. of
Incidents Killed Injured
Targeted attacks [not clear if by terrorists]
2 2 0
Protests/clashes with security
forces 1 4 14
Total 433 588 1,030
As for the number of terrorist attacks, the
overall incidents of violence also
plummeted from 497 in 2018 to 433 in
2019. The overall number of people killed
in these violent incidents also decreased
by about 32 percent; from 869 in 2018 to
588 in 2019. Similarly, the number of
people injured in all such incidents of
violence also decreased by 32 percent
from 1,516 in 2018 to 1,030 in 2019. (See
Chart 2)
There has been a gradual decrease in the
number of terrorist attacks and
consequent fatalities in Pakistan since
2009 with the only exception of 2013
when a surge in sectarian violence mainly
contributed in increased number of attacks
and casualties. (See Chart 3 and Table 4)
The continuous anti-militant operational
and surveillance campaigns by security
forces and police’s counter terrorism
departments (CTDs) as well as some
counter-extremism actions taken under the
National Action Plan (NAP) have
apparently helped sustain that declining
trend 2013 onward, which continued in
2019 as well.
Chart 2: Comparison of Overall
Incidents of Violence & Casualties
(2015-19)
Chart 3: Comparison of Terrorist
Attacks and Fatalities in Pakistan
(2009-2019)
1097
749
713
497 433
3503
18871611
869
588
2167
1956
2212
1516
1030
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
No. of Incidents Killed Injured
No. of attacks
Fatalities (No. of killed)
Pakistan Security Report | 2019
24
Table 4: Comparison of Terrorist
Attacks and Fatalities in Pakistan
(2009-19)2
Year No. of Terrorist
Attacks (%Change)
No. of Killed (% Change)
2009 Baseline year (2,586 attacks)
Baseline year (3,021 Fatalities)
2010 18% 4%
2011 7% 18%
2012 20% 14%
2013 9% 19%
2014 30% 30%
2015 48% 38%
2016 28% 12%
2017 16% 10%
2018 29% 27%
2019 13% 40%
For the past few years, much of the
militant violence in Pakistan has visibly
concentrated in Balochistan and Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa while other regions have
been facing less frequent attacks. In 2019,
while the number of terrorist attacks
declined in Balochistan by 27 percent, the
number of such attacks recorded in KP
remained unchanged from the year before.
The number of terrorist attacks recorded
in these two regions was significant; 125
attacks took place in KP and 84 in
Balochistan, which combined were over 91
percent of the total attacks reported from
across Pakistan. Although the number of
attacks showed a relative surge from
previous year in Punjab (by 25 percent),
Sindh (17 percent) and Islamabad, but
that accounted for much less numbers of
attacks reported from there compared to
KP and Balochistan; i.e. 5 attacks, 14
attacks, and one attack were reported
from Punjab, Sindh and Islamabad,
respectively.
Table 5: Comparison of Terrorist
Attacks & Casualties (2018 vs. 2019)3
Province /
Region
Number
of Attacks
(%Change)
Killed
(%
Change)
Injured
(%
Change)
KP No change 26% 34%
Balochistan 27% 52% 25%
Punjab 25% 5% 5%
Karachi 11% 22% 87%
Sindh
(excluding
Karachi)
33% 300% 100%
Islamabad
1 attack
(0 baseline
data in
2018)
2 killed 0 injured
Total 13% 40% 29%
The number of suicide attacks posted a 79
percent decline from previous year.
Compared to 19 suicide attacks in 2018, as
many as four (4) such attacks happened in
2019 – two in Balochistan and one each in
Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. These
attacks claimed 55 lives – compared to
317 in 2018 – and injured 122 others. The
TTP was involved in two of these attacks –
Pakistan Security Report | 2019
25
one reported from Loralai (Balochistan)
and another from DI Khan (KP) – which
targeted security forces causing the death
of a total of 21 people including 10
civilians, seven (7) policemen and four (4)
suicide bombers. The Islamic State (IS)
terrorist group claimed one sectarian-
related suicide attack that targeted Hazara
community in Quetta killing 21 people,
including the bomber, and wounding 48
others. Meanwhile a suicide bomber
associated with Hizbul Ahrar targeted a
police van in Lahore that caused 13
fatalities – 5 policemen, 7 civilians and one
bomber – and injuries to 23 others.
Posting an increase of about 17 percent
from previous year, 14 sectarian-related
terrorist attacks happened in 2019. The
number of people killed in such incidents
however decreased by over 25 percent,
from 51 in 2018 to 38 in 2019. Rival Sunni
and Shia violent sectarian groups as well
as ISIS-affiliates were involved in
perpetrating these attacks. A combined
total of 11 sectarian-related attacks, or
over 78 percent of the total 14 such
attacks, happened in Karachi (6 attacks)
and Quetta (5 attacks) alone. A major
sectarian-related suicide attack targeted
Hazara community members in Quetta
causing significant casualties (21 deaths;
48 injured). Two sectarian-related attacks
were reported from Ziarat in Balochistan
that claimed five (5) lives, and one such
attack happened in DI Khan district of
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Out of the 14
reported sectarian attacks, as many as 10
targeted Shia religious community and
scholars, another three (3) Sunni
community members and leaders while
one attack targeted Bohra community in
Ziarat.
With a slight decline of over 2 percent
from the year before, 128 cross-border
attacks were reported from Pakistan’s
borders with Afghanistan (4 attacks), India
(123) and Iran (one attack). Similarly,
down by about 18 percent from 2018, a
total of 91 people were killed in these
attacks; another 245 were also injured.
Those 91 Pakistani citizens killed in cross-
border attacks included 61 civilians, 29
army officials, and one Rangers personnel.
The situation at Pakistan’s border with
India – mainly along the Line of Control
(LoC) in Azad Kashmir – remained
relatively more volatile, particularly after
February 26th when Indian military planes
violated the LoC, intruding from the
Muzaffarabad sector and reaching Balakot,
where they dropped their payload in an
open space after a response from Pakistan
Air Force, and escaped. Next day, Indian
Air Force aircraft reportedly entered
Pakistani airspace following Pakistani Air
Force strikes across the LoC. According to
ISPR statement, PAF shot down two Indian
aircraft inside Pakistani airspace and
arrested one Indian pilot who was later
released as a gesture of peace. Out of 123
cross-border attacks perpetrated by Indian
BSF, 117 concentrated along the LoC in 11
Pakistan Security Report | 2019
26
districts of AJK and one district of KP
(Mansehra). As many as six (6) of these
attacks happened in Sialkot along the
Working Boundary with India. Kotli (33
attacks), Bhimber (22), Poonch (16),
Haveli (10) and Neelum (10 attacks) were
the AJK districts most affected by Indian
cross-border attacks. Meanwhile while a
single cross-border attack from Iran did
not cause any casualty, four (4) reported
attacks from Afghanistan killed six (6)
army soldiers and injured 19 others in
North Waziristan, Upper Dir and Chitral;
one such attack also happened in Khyber
but did not cause any casualty.
Compared to 31 in the year before,
security forces and law enforcement
agencies conducted 28 anti-militant
operational strikes in 2019 in 21 districts
and regions of Pakistan. These actions
killed a total of 81 people, as compared to
77 in 2018 and injured 19 others; those 81
killed included 75 militants and six (6)
personnel of security and law enforcement
agencies. Out of the total 28 operational
strikes reported in 2019, as many as 15
were conducted in KP, 11 in Balochistan,
and one each in Punjab and Sindh. There
were only three (3) districts where more
than one anti-militant operation happened
including DI Khan (5) and North Waziristan
(3) in KP, and Kech (2) in Balochistan.
Security and law enforcement agencies
also entered into in a total of 25 armed
clashes and encounters with militants –
one more than such incidents in previous
year – across 15 districts/regions of the
country. These armed clashes and
encounters claimed 44 lives (38 militants;
6 security personnel); as many as nine (9)
security personnel were also injured in
these incidents. About half of these
clashes, i.e. 12, took place in various
districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, another
six (6) happened in Balochistan, while four
(4) such incidents took place in Sindh and
three (3) in Punjab.
The number of incidents of political/ethnic
violence took a significant downward turn,
from 22 in 2018 to eight (8) in the year
under review. The number of people killed
in these incidents also decreased, from 11
in 2018 to six (6) in 2019. Incidents of
political and ethnic violence were reported
from six (6) districts of the country
including three (3) from Karachi, and one
incident each from Bajaur, Bannu,
Mansehra, South Waziristan and Swat
districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
The number of people killed in overall
violent incidents in 2019 (588) represented
a decrease of about 32 percent from those
killed in such incidents in the year before
(869); the number of those injured in such
incidents all decreased by over 32 percent.
The reported decrease in fatalities was
marked by the death of 235 civilians,
compared to 456 in 2018, thus
representing a decrease of over 48
percent. Fatalities among security forces
personnel in 2019 (209) were about six (6)
percent less from the previous year’s
Pakistan Security Report | 2019
27
fatalities among them (222). The number
of militants killed (144), in these violent
incidents, also posted a decline of about
25 percent as compared to 2018. (See
Table 6)
Table 6: Casualties in Overall Violent
Incidents in 2019
Category Killed Injured
FC 39 66
Militants 144 4
Civilian 235 764
Police 60 92
Army 95 97
Levies 14 7
Rangers 1 0
Total 588 1,030
Get complete issue now!
Buy Soft Copy
Buy Hard Copy (For Pakistan)
Buy Hard Copy (Other Countries)
Complete issue is also available at leading bookstores in Pakistan.
To place order, call PIPS at +92-51-8359475-6 or email at
Notes
1 Waseem Shamsi, “Unrest in Ghotki as teacher accused of blasphemy,” Dawn, September 16, 2019.
2and represent increase and decrease, respectively, from previous year.
3and represent increase and decrease, respectively, from 2018 to 2019.