score fellowship final report

38
SCORE Fellowship Final Report Anna Comas-Quinn Department of Languages 26 April 2012

Upload: anna-comas-quinn

Post on 21-Dec-2014

123 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Final report of my SCORE fellowship work, carried out November 2010 to March 2012.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Anna Comas-Quinn

Department of Languages

26 April 2012

Page 2: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Community building and user engagement: developing the

potential of LORO

Some background

Project objectives

The report: activities & outputs, findings, dissemination, conclusions

Page 3: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Languages Open Resources Online http://loro.open.ac.uk/

Page 4: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Languages Open Resources Onlinehttp://loro.open.ac.uk

LORO is about: • ...making all teaching materials for all levels

and languages available to all users,• …allowing users to share their own materials

with the OU languages community, • …making all tutorial materials available to the

wider languages community,

• …starting a change in the way we work (OER, access, reflection, transparency, quality).

Page 5: SCORE Fellowship Final Report
Page 6: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

SCORE Fellowship project objectives

• Continue engaging OU users and raising awareness of the benefits of OERs for teaching and learning;

• Engage active users into further dissemination activities within and beyond the OU;

• Explore links with other languages institutions to promote the use of LORO and widen the community of potential users;

Page 7: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

• Explore links with HE providers across Europe to share practice around LORO and OERs for languages;

• Evaluate the effectiveness of LORO and the extent of the culture change in teaching practices amongst OU users.

SCORE Fellowship project objectives

Page 8: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Activities and outputs

Page 9: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

• Raising awareness• (DoL, OU, language teachers)

• Research events• Impact of OER (23 March 2011)

• Learning by sharing, Bologna (29-30 March 2012)

Talking OER

Page 10: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

From OER to OEP

Make openness and OER part of other activities

DoL Training workspace

Performing Languages www.performinglanguages.eu

Collaborative Writing and Peer Review

Page 11: SCORE Fellowship Final Report
Page 12: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Although the primary aim of the learning partnership is not to produce materials but to share experiences and develop common understandings, the resources we produce for our project (such as workshop activities, lesson plans, texts and video recordings) will be made into Open Educational Resources (OER), freely available under a Creative Commons license. (…) In this way, we will ensure that the experiences and ideas from this project can be either replicated by others as such, or adapted to their specific context and needs, thus increasing the impact of the project.

Page 13: SCORE Fellowship Final Report
Page 14: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Collaborative Writing and Peer Review Project

• Give and receive feedback• Introduction to peer review• Generate ideas• Keep up to date with technology (e.g. Jing)• Maximise use of existing resources• Create and share resources

adapted from a slide by Caroline Rowan-Olive

Page 15: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Working across languages – adapting resources from different languages

slide by Caroline Rowan-Olive

Page 16: SCORE Fellowship Final Report
Page 17: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Reusable Reuse Game, Chris Pegler, National Teaching Fellow, The Open Universityhttp://www.slideshare.net/orioleproject/chris-pegler-reusable-card-game

OER (languages) workshops

Page 18: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Findings

Page 19: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

How do we measure impact?

• Metrics (eprints inbuilt + google analytics)

• Surveys (questionnaires + usage polls)

• Data from forums

• Focus groups

• Narrative frames (Barkhuizen, G. and Wette, R. (2008) ‘Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers’, System, 36, 372–387)

Page 20: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Quantitative data

• 1.5 million page views to date• 20,000 downloads in the last 6 months• over 1100 registered users • over 2500 resources• 900+ visitors a month from around the world

(data from LORO inbuilt stats and Google analytics)

Page 21: SCORE Fellowship Final Report
Page 22: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Teachers are using LORO…

• To find resources for their teaching“I often also check what other teachers have done to

teach the same topic or a similar structure”

• To find inspiration and ideas“even if I don’t find anything I can use, it starts the ideas

flowing in my head”

• To standardise their practice and ensure comparability of the student experience

“to make sure the contents covered in my own tutorial are

similar to those used by the rest of the course team and tutors”

Page 23: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Benefits of using LORO

• Increased confidence in one’s own practice“Seeing other work enables you to judge your own, and reassures you that you are doing the right thing”

• Freedom to develop other aspects of one’s teaching practice

“It gives us time and space to create some individual styles”

“I can concentrate on how I will teach culture or how to teach through the asynchronous forum”

Page 24: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Benefits of using LORO• Value of feedback on one’s work

“gives me an opportunity to gain useful feedback on the work I do”

• … but there are constraints“peer comment should be extended, but the restraints of all our workloads make this a problem”

• Increase quality of teaching materials“sharing the resources I have created with colleagues stimulates me to write very good materials, test them and improve them so that they can be used by someone else. LORO really pushes me to produce better materials”

Page 25: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

“When something you’ve done is going to be on paper for years and your name will be attached to it, you feel the need to ensure it is perfect. When it’s online, even if it’s open to the rest of the world, it is incredibly temporary, it can be changed all the time. There is no perfect final product. I’ve never been so aware of it before.”

(participant in the Collaborative Writing and Peer Review project)

Page 26: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Dissemination

Page 27: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

• LORO newsletter

• Internal (department / faculty / institution)

• Workshops

• Conference presentations

• Publications

• JISC-funded event on Impact

• Bologna OER in languages event

Page 28: SCORE Fellowship Final Report
Page 29: SCORE Fellowship Final Report
Page 30: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Conclusions

Page 31: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Work with those who want to work with you

©James Roe at http://www.flickr.com/photos/98289645@N00/394540090/

Page 32: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Jakob Nielsen (2006) “Participation Inequality: Encouraging More Users to Contribute”

Page 33: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

It takes time, people move at their own pace

Image from Project Gutenberg

Page 34: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

Newbiggin Hall Scouts http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fallen_tree_-_geograph.org.uk_-_495932.jpg

If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

Page 35: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

White, D. Manton, M. JISC-funded OER Impact Study, University of Oxford, 2011

Page 36: SCORE Fellowship Final Report
Page 37: SCORE Fellowship Final Report

A theoretical framework: activity theory & expansive learning

When whole collective activity systems, such as work processes and organisations, need to redefine themselves, traditional models of learning are not enough. Nobody knows exactly what needs to be learned.

(…) learners are involved in constructing and implementing a radically new, wider and more complex object and concept for their activity.Engeström, Y (1987) Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.