Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

Scientists Learn the Ropes on Tying MolecularKnotsAs chemists tie the most complicated molecular knot yet, biophysicists create a “periodic table” thatdescribes what kinds of knots are possible.

By Jordana Cepelewicz

Olena Shmahalo/Quanta Magazine; Source: David Leigh

Through directed self-assembly techniques, chemists are making tiny molecular knots in their labs. The illustrationportrays the structure of a five-crossing knot synthesized in 2011.

The world is tied up in knots. They form spontaneously in swirling vortices of smoke, in long strandsof yarn or hair, and in the earbud cords that somehow always tangle in one’s pocket. Even down atthe molecular scale, they appear in the long chains making up some proteins, and when they arise inDNA’s twists and coils, enzymes have to help unwind them. Biophysicists study these knots to figure

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

out how they get there and how they contribute to the behavior of those molecules.

Chemists, meanwhile, have turned their attention to molecular knots of their own making: smallersynthetic constructions assembled from joined fragments rather than tied in a single continuousbiomolecular string. In their labs, they have been painstakingly synthesizing such tiny knots,achieving escalating levels of intricacy, with the hope of eventually exploiting the knots’ uniquetopologies in new nanotools, pharmaceuticals and novel materials with desirable properties. Themost recent — and most complex — knot to join these ranks, a composite structure fashioned out ofthree simpler knots, was reported last month in Nature Chemistry and took years to build.

In August, other researchers published a theoretical paper in Nature Communications that tabulatedwhich knots chemists should seek to make next. They hope the work will provide insights into whatgoverns the ability of small artificial knots to assemble themselves spontaneously — and help themto get a handle on just how complicated such knots can be.

And despite the significant differences between those designs and the knots found in DNA andproteins, some scientists think that analyzing the synthetic systems could eventually inform theunderstanding of knotting in biological contexts, too.

Knot Zoos in the LabTo mathematicians, a knot means something like an ordinary knot tied in string, only the string’sends are then attached so that the tangle can’t wiggle loose. More formally, it’s a closed curve,embedded in three-dimensional space, that does not intersect itself and cannot be reduced to asimple loop. Knots can be represented as planar projections, two-dimensional drawings with“crossings” where one part of the thread goes over or under another. Two knots are considered thesame if one can be shifted and rotated to form the other without altering its fundamental topology.

Lucy Reading-Ikkanda/Quanta Magazine

Mathematicians classify knots by ordering them according to their minimum number of crossings.After the “unknot” (a circle) comes the simplest knot, one with three crossings, known as a trefoil.(Knots with one or two crossings are topologically equivalent to the unknot.) Next, there’s one with

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

four crossings, two with five crossings, three with six crossings, seven with seven crossings…. Thosenumbers then explode: There are 165 knots with 10 crossings, and for 16 crossings, there are morethan a million. Moreover, knots can be connected to one another in specific ways to form compositeknots.

Chemists want their own creations to attain some of that complexity, but the going has been slow.They manufactured the first molecular knot — the trefoil — in 1989, and for decades, that was it.“That seemed to us an unsatisfactory state of affairs,” said David Leigh, a chemist at the Universityof Manchester in England. “Just as in the world of fishermen or climbers, [where] different knotshave different functions, the same is true in the molecular world.”

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

University of Manchester

David Leigh, a chemist at the University of Manchester, and his colleagues have synthesized some of the mostcomplex molecular knots to date, including a composite one with nine-crossings.

Being able to build more complicated knots will, at the least, help researchers to probe how knotsaffect the strength, flexibility and other features of materials, and to determine which ones are bestsuited to which purposes. Some experts foresee a future in which knots might be woven together toform functional materials with heat-resistant or catalyzing properties. Others hope to one day usemicroscopic knots as nests for the safe transport of drug molecules or other minute cargo.

“Creating molecular knots is the best way chemists can show they’ve really mastered the molecularlaws,” said Cristian Micheletti, a computational biophysicist at the International School for AdvancedStudies in Italy, and the leader of the team that published the Nature Communications paper. “It’slike an intellectual playground” on which researchers can test their mettle.

And so Leigh and others have been making more elaborate kinds of knots, using specially designedfragments and an ionically charged molecular scaffold that can position them for joining. In this way,Leigh most recently succeeded in building the two most complex knots to date: an eight-crossingknot, and a composite, nine-crossing one. He’s currently applying the same strategy to synthesizenew configurations.

Ideally, however, scientists would be able to explore such configurations more systematicallythrough an understanding of general knotting patterns and principles of directed self-assembly.That’s what Micheletti and his colleagues set out to make possible.

A New Knot TableMicheletti’s team wanted to investigate which knots could be synthesized most easily. They usedsimple computational models to stitch three, four or five identical fragments of a helix together intoclosed chains, then moved the fragments around without breaking their connections. In this way, theresearchers generated thousands of potential configurations. They then identified which kinds ofknots had appeared, and picked out those that had a certain degree of symmetry — somethingcommon to the handful of molecular knots that chemists have been able to create so far.

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

Courtesy of Cristian Micheletti

Cristian Micheletti in Trieste, Italy, home to the International School for Advanced Studies. There, he does researchon the formation of knots in biological and synthetic contexts. Recently, he and his team published work predictingwhich new knots might be made most easily through directed self-assembly.

That left them with only a small repertoire of knots — knots that in further simulations did indeedself-assemble more frequently. Among them were most of the knots that had been madeexperimentally to date, as well as new candidates for synthesis that included a 10-crossing and a 15-crossing knot.

Most noteworthy, though, was the discovery that simpler knots are not always easier to make. Thenext knot to appear after five crossings, for instance, did not contain six crossings but rather eight.The researchers realized that adding crossings sometimes lent a knot symmetry that would make iteasier to synthesize. That was the case for one of the eight-crossing knots that the work uncovered:It is topologically equivalent to one with four crossings — but the four-crossing version is moredifficult to make.

Working from another way of representing the knots in two dimensions, called braid diagrams(which highlight cyclical aspects of how a thread gets twisted into a knot), Micheletti and his teamwere able to generalize their findings to larger numbers of building blocks and greater degrees of“interwovenness.” This in turn allowed the researchers to design a new kind of reference table forknots.

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

Lucy Reading-Ikkanda/Quanta Magazine; Source: DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05413-z

Micheletti acknowledges that his “knot zoo” makes certain assumptions that limit its scope — forexample, that the knots will consist only of identical building blocks. Still, his work can start to guidechemists’ further synthesis efforts.

That goes for other theoretical efforts as well. One group, led by Ivan Coluzza, a computationalbiophysicist who studies protein folding at the Basque Foundation for Science in Spain, is usingMicheletti’s work as a reference in tests of how adding new sequences of amino acids to protein-likemodels affects the fundamental spectrum of knots that arise in them. The work, published earlierthis month, has suggested that knotted backbones are so rare in proteins because of the number ofamino acid types available for use: With a 20-letter alphabet at their disposal, proteins are less likelyto form knots spontaneously than they are when their alphabet consists of only, say, three letters.

A Biological PlaygroundBy continuing to put together a diverse array of knots in the lab, it may be possible to determine howknots self-assemble, and what the knots do to the properties of synthesized strands. And just maybe,some of those insights could one day help biophysicists learn about what knots are doing in DNA,proteins or other molecules in which they naturally emerge. (Some researchers, for instance,suspect that knots confer greater stability to the small number of proteins in which they’re found,but they have yet to prove it.)

It’s important to emphasize that the self-assembly processes Leigh and Micheletti use are quitedifferent from those that produce biomolecules in nature. Experimentally or computationally, Leighand Micheletti paste together short pieces of material to attain their knots, and the geometry ofthose pieces constrains what can form. In contrast, biological knots form when a full-length string —of nucleotide bases in DNA, for example, or amino acids in a protein — bends and threads throughitself to create any of a massive number of structures.

Nevertheless, Leigh and his colleagues hope that their synthetic work — once it’s reached asufficient level of complexity — could improve scientists’ understanding of knotting in biology. Atthe very least, “by identifying these knots that are more likely to occur … it gives us biologistssomething to look for,” said Lynn Zechiedrich, a molecular biologist who studies the structure andfunction of DNA at the Baylor College of Medicine. With current imaging technology, after all, it’sbeen difficult to confirm the structures of very complicated biological knots. Take uncondensedchromosomes, which look like a tangle of spaghetti: They might harbor “these hugely complicatedknots [from Micheletti’s table],” Zechiedrich said. “It’s just that we don’t have the resolution to seeit.”

“Micheletti’s showing that there are simple ways of creating relatively complex knots. And thismight give us a hint that perhaps nature can be using similar ways to create knotted molecules,”added Piotr Szymczak, a theoretical physicist at the University of Warsaw. It could also provideinformation about whether it’s possible to get more complex topologies in the natural world. Justhow intricately shaped can a knot system be and still self-assemble, and does it appear inbiomolecules as well?

Leigh, for one, may already be starting to see some hints emerge in his artificial systems (though he

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/scientists-learn-the-ropes-on-tying-molecular-knots-20181029/ October 29, 2018

cautions that those results have yet to be tested in biological systems). For example, he and his teamhave observed a correlation between the tightness of knots and how pronounced their chirality, or“handedness,” is (some knots are chiral, meaning that they can never be rotated or shifted to lookexactly like their mirror image). Moreover, in 2016, they constructed a five-crossing knot that couldspeed up chemical reactions. In its unknotted form, the molecule was unable to act as a catalyst,which demonstrates the powerful effects that knots can have in chemistry — and that they may havein biology as well.

Some DNA can supercoil, for instance, the way a coiled telephone cord can twist upon itself.Supercoiling has been an object of research for how it might affect the behavior of DNA —Zechiedrich thinks that in some cases (at least in bacteria), knots and supercoils that don’t getuntangled are highly susceptible to mutations — yet chemists haven’t been able to make knots withthat supercoiled property to study it in more detail.

But that may change. Leigh’s nine-crossing knot shares some key characteristics with supercoiledDNA. “So by studying these [composite knots] and understanding them in the simple control systemswe make, we may be able to develop some insights into what’s happening at the molecular level withsupercoiled DNA structures,” Leigh said.

Not everyone agrees. Micheletti himself is skeptical about extrapolating from the synthetic knots tobiological ones. Sophie Jackson, a chemist at the University of Cambridge in England who studiesknotted proteins, also thinks that the fact that the synthetic knots are made by such a differentprocess means they can’t tell us much about those in DNA and other biomolecules. But “it’s stillearly days,” Leigh said. “We’ve made only a few different sorts of knots, and have seen only a fewdifferent sorts of properties.”

“I think it’s always interesting,” Zechiedrich added, “to push the boundaries and see what else is outthere.”

Correction added Oct. 30: In an earlier version of the drawing of topologically equivalent knots, oneof the crossings was shown incorrectly.