sbm scoring matrix.pdf
DESCRIPTION
School Based ManagementTRANSCRIPT
SBM Scoring Matrix As of 2013
Name of School: Division: Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Thematic Area
Performance Indicator
Rating & Equivalent Points Computation Results
Access Enrolment Increase % of Inc. 1 – Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 – Average: At least 7% increase 3 – High: At least 10% increase
____ x 0.45=
(45%) SY 2010-11:
SY 2011-12:
SY 2012-13:
SY 2013-14: Ave. of Increase:
Efficiency Dropout Rate (DR): % of Dec. Baseline: 7.06 1 – Marginal: At least 25% decrease 2 – Average: At least 50% decrease 3 – High: Has 0 DR
____ x 0.25=
(25%) SY 2009-10:
SY 2010-11:
SY 2011-12:
SY 2012-13:
Ave. of Decrease::
Completion rate (CR): % of Inc. Baseline: 75% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 – Average: At least 7% increase 3 – High: At least 10% increase
SY 2009-10:
SY 2010-11:
SY 2011-12:
SY 2012-13:
Ave. of Increase:
Cohort Survival Rate (CSR): % of Inc.
Baseline: 76% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 – Average: At least 7% increase 3 – High: At least 10% increase
SY 2009-10:
SY 2010-11:
SY 2011-12:
SY 2012-13: Ave. of Increase:
Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR):
Quality NAT MPS % of Inc.
1 – Marginal : 26 – 50% 2 – Average : 51 – 75% 3 – High : 76 – 100%
____ x 0.30=
(30%) SY 2009-10:
SY 2010-11:
SY 2011-12:
SY 2012-13:
Ave. of Increase:
Sub-total
Interpretation : Good Better Best Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
Note: Only schools having a performance Improvement of Better can apply to the Division for SBM Validation. Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)
SBM Principles Weight Cumulative Scores of Validators per
Principle Results Computation
Leadership 30% _____ x 0.3
Curriculum & Learning 30% _____ x 0.3
Accountability 25% _____ x 0.25
Resource Management 15% _____ x 0.15
Subtotal 100%
Interpretation : Good Better Best Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
Step 3: Compute for Final Rating
Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance Improvement 60%
B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40%
TOTAL 100%
Interpretation : Developing (Level I) Maturing (Level II) Advanced (Level III) Description of SBM Level of Practice:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 – 1.49 Developing
1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.00 Advanced