school sbm scoring matrix protected automatic 1
DESCRIPTION
Excel-based FormattedSCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT (SBM)ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT)for:* Elementary- Complete ES- Incomplete ES* SecondaryTRANSCRIPT
SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOLInstruction: Edit data in "gray" cells only. This template is applicable for complete elementary schools.
School ID: 132763 Name of School: LANUZA CES District: LANUZA
PART I: COMPUTATION FOR THE 60% PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
THEMATIC AREA #1: ACCESS - ENROLMENT (45%)
Year Enrolment Difference % of Increase Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result2011-12 356 22012-13 372 16 4.49 x
2013-14 404 32 8.6045%
2014-15 440 36 8.91
Ave. % of Increase: 7.34 7.34 0.9
THEMATIC AREA #2: EFFICIENCY (DROP-OUT, COMPLETION, COHORT-SURVIVAL RATE) - 30% THEMATIC AREA #2.1.: EFFICIENCY - DROP-OUT RATE
Year Rate % of Decrease
2011-12 356 356 0 0.00 0pt. - 24.99% and below
2012-13 372 372 0 0.00 100.00 1pt. - Marginal: At least 25% dec. (25% - 49.99%)
2013-14 404 404 0 0.00 100.00 2pts. - Average: at least 50% dec. (50% - 99.99%) 32014-15 440 440 0 0.00 100.00 3pts. - High: Has 0 dropout
Ave. % of Decrease: 100.00 100 THEMATIC AREA #2.2.: EFFICIENCY - COMPLETION RATE
Year Rate % of Increase Baseline: 75%
2011-12 65 63 103.17 37.57 0pt. - Negative Results (4.99% and below)
2012-13 53 51 103.92 38.56 1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%) 32013-14 52 57 91.23 21.64 2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)
2014-15 66 57 115.79 54.39 3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Ave % of Increase: 38.04 38.04
THEMATIC AREA #2.3.: EFFICIENCY - COHORT SURVIVAL RATEYear Rate % of Increase Baseline: 75%
2011-12 65 63 103.17 37.57 0 pt - 4.99% and below
2012-13 53 51 103.92 38.56 1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)2013-14 52 57 91.23 21.64 2pts. -Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%) 32014-15 66 57 115.79 54.39 3pts. -High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Ave % of Increase: 38.04 38.04
Computation of Points for Efficiency (25%) = Pts. For Drop-out, Completion & Cohort-Survival Rate shall be added
3 3 3 9.00 divided by 3 equals 3 times 0.25 equals
THEMATIC AREA #3: QUALITY - ACHIEVEMENT/NAT RATE (30%)Year NAT MPS % of Inc. Baseline = 48%
2011-12 82.86 72.63 1-Marginal: at least 7% inc. 32012-13 78.67 63.90 2-Average: at least 8% Inc. x
2013-14 86.65 80.53 3-High: at least 10% Inc.30%
2014-15 74.09 54.36
Ave % of Increase 67.85 67.85 1.35Subtotal:
0pt. - Negative Results (0.99% and below) 1pt. - Marginal: at least 1% inc. (1% - 6.99%) 2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%) 3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Total En. EoSY
Total En. EoSY +
Dropout/sTotal Dropout
SYnRating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result
Baseline: 7.06 (Constant)
Gr. VI Graduates
SYnGr. I En. SYn-5
Gr. VI En. SYn Gr. I En. SYn-5
PART II: COMPUTATION FOR VALIDATED SBM ASSESSMENT SCORES (40%)
SBM Principles Cases Weight Weight
Leadership 5 15 30% 3.00 x 0.3 =Curriculum and Learning 7 18 30% 2.57 x 0.3 =Accountability 5 13 25% 2.60 x 0.25 =Resource Management 5 15 15% 3.00 x 0.15 =
TOTAL 100% Subtotal
PART III: COMPUTATION FOR FINAL RATINGAreas Weight Computation Results
A . Performance Improvement 60% 3.00 x 0.6 1.8B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40% 2.77 x 0.4 1.11
TOTAL 100% TOTAL RATING: 2.91
Descriptive Rating: ADVANCED
Prepared by: Noted by:
Signature Over Printed Name Name of School HeadPosition: Position: ____________________________
Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle (Average Scores)
SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL
LANUZA
Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result
0.9
0.75
1.353.00
Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result Baseline: 7.06 (Constant)
Result
0.90.770.650.45
2.77
4.64Results
2.91
ADVANCED
Pls. retype.
SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOLInstruction: Edit data in "gray" cells only. This template is applicable for incomplete elementary schools.
School ID: 132762 Name of School: HABAG PS District: LANUZA
PART I: COMPUTATION FOR THE 60% PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
THEMATIC AREA #1: ACCESS - ENROLMENT (45%)
Year Enrolment Difference % of Increase Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result2011-12 52 02012-13 43 -9 -17.31 x
2013-14 44 1 2.3345%
2014-15 33 -11 -25.00
Ave. % of Increase: -13.33 -13.33 0
THEMATIC AREA #2: EFFICIENCY (DROP-OUT, COMPLETION, COHORT-SURVIVAL RATE) - 30% THEMATIC AREA #2.1.: EFFICIENCY - DROP-OUT RATE
Year Rate % of Decrease
2011-12 52 52 0 0.00 0pt. - 24.99% and below
2012-13 43 43 0 0.00 100.00 1pt. - Marginal: At least 25% dec. (25% - 49.99%)
2013-14 44 44 0 0.00 100.00 2pts. - Average: at least 50% dec. (50% - 99.99%) 22014-15 33 35 2 5.71 19.06 3pts. - High: Has 0 dropout
Ave. % of Decrease: 73.02 73.02 THEMATIC AREA #2.2.: EFFICIENCY - COMPLETION RATE
Year Rate % of Increase Baseline: 75%
2011-12 0 25 0.00 -100.00 0pt. - Negative Results (4.99% and below)
2012-13 0 17 0.00 -100.00 1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%) 32013-14 0 15 0.00 -100.00 2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)
2014-15 0 34 0.00 -100.00 3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Ave % of Increase: -100.00 100
THEMATIC AREA #2.3.: EFFICIENCY - COHORT SURVIVAL RATEYear Rate % of Increase Baseline: 75%
2011-12 0 25 0.00 -100.00 0 pt - 4.99% and below
2012-13 0 17 0.00 -100.00 1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)2013-14 0 15 0.00 -100.00 2pts. -Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%) 32014-15 0 34 0.00 -100.00 3pts. -High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Ave % of Increase: -100.00 100.00
Computation of Points for Efficiency (25%) = Pts. For Drop-out, Completion & Cohort-Survival Rate shall be added
2 3 3 8.00 divided by 3 equals 2.667 times 0.25 equals
THEMATIC AREA #3: QUALITY - ACHIEVEMENT/NAT RATE (30%)Year NAT MPS % of Inc. Baseline = 48%
2011-12 58.46 21.79 0 pt. - 6.99% and below 32012-13 78.66 63.87 1pt. - Marginal: at least 7% inc. (7% - 7.99%) x
2013-14 84.37 75.77 2pts. - Average: at least 8% Inc. (8% - 9.99%)30%
2014-15 81.41 69.60 3pts. - High: at least 10% Inc. (10% and above)
Ave % of Increase 57.76 57.76 1.35Subtotal:
0pt. - Negative Results (0.99% and below) 1pt. - Marginal: at least 1% inc. (1% - 6.99%) 2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%) 3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Total En. EoSY
Total En. EoSY +
Dropout/sTotal Dropout
SYnRating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result
Baseline: 7.06 (Constant)
Gr. VI Graduates
SYnGr. I En. SYn-5
Gr. VI En. SYn Gr. I En. SYn-5
PART II: COMPUTATION FOR VALIDATED SBM ASSESSMENT SCORES (40%)
SBM Principles Cases Weight Weight
Leadership 5 15 30% 3.00 x 0.3 =Curriculum and Learning 7 18 30% 2.57 x 0.3 =Accountability 5 13 25% 2.60 x 0.25 =Resource Management 5 15 15% 3.00 x 0.15 =
TOTAL 100% Subtotal
PART III: COMPUTATION FOR FINAL RATINGAreas Weight Computation Results
A . Performance Improvement 60% 2.02 x 0.6 1.21B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40% 2.77 x 0.4 1.11
TOTAL 100% TOTAL RATING: 2.32
Descriptive Rating: MATURING
Prepared by: Noted by:
Signature Over Printed Name Name of School HeadPosition: Position: ____________________________
Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle (Average Scores)
SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL
LANUZA
Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result
0
0.67
1.352.02
Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result Baseline: 7.06 (Constant)
Result
0.90.770.650.45
2.77
4.64Results
2.32
MATURING
Pls. retype.
SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOLInstruction: Edit data in "gray" cells only.
School ID: 304861 Name of School: BAROBO NHS District: BAROBO
PART I: COMPUTATION FOR THE 60% PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
THEMATIC AREA #1: ACCESS - ENROLMENT (45%)
Year Enrolment Difference % of Increase Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result2011-12 1,243 02012-13 1,061 -182 -14.64 x
2013-14 1,068 7 0.6645%
2014-15 1,211 143 13.39
Ave. % of Increase: -0.20 -0.2 0
THEMATIC AREA #2: EFFICIENCY (DROP-OUT, COMPLETION, COHORT-SURVIVAL RATE) - 30% THEMATIC AREA #2.1.: EFFICIENCY - DROP-OUT RATE
Year Rate % of Decrease
2011-12 1,243 1,284 41 3.19 0pt. - 24.99% and below
2012-13 1,061 1,117 56 5.01 28.99 1pt. - Marginal: At least 25% dec. (25% - 49.99%)
2013-14 1,068 1,112 44 3.96 43.95 2pts. - Average: at least 50% dec. (50% - 99.99%) 12014-15 1,211 1,243 32 2.57 63.54 3pts. - High: Has 0 dropout
Ave. % of Decrease: 45.49 45.49 THEMATIC AREA #2.2.: EFFICIENCY - COMPLETION RATE
Year Rate % of Increase Baseline: 75%
2011-12 306 394 77.66 3.55 0pt. - Negative Results (4.99% and below)
2012-13 210 282 74.47 -0.71 1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%) 02013-14 205 304 67.43 -10.09 2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%)
2014-15 231 393 58.78 -21.63 3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Ave % of Increase: -7.22 -7.22
THEMATIC AREA #2.3.: EFFICIENCY - COHORT SURVIVAL RATE
Year Y4 En. SYn Rate % of Increase Baseline: 75%
2011-12 326 394 82.74 10.32 0 pt - 4.99% and below
2012-13 211 282 74.82 -0.24 1pt. - Marginal: At least 5% inc. (5% - 6.99%)2013-14 205 304 67.43 -10.09 2pts. -Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%) 02014-15 235 393 59.80 -20.27 3pts. -High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Ave % of Increase: -5.07 -5.07
Computation of Points for Efficiency (25%) = Pts. For Drop-out, Completion & Cohort-Survival Rate shall be added
1 0 0 1.00 divided by 3 equals 0.333 times 0.25 equals
THEMATIC AREA #3: QUALITY - ACHIEVEMENT/NAT RATE (30%)Year NAT MPS % of Inc. Baseline = 48%
2011-12 58.46 21.79 0 pt. - 6.99% and below 32012-13 77.98 62.47 1pt. - Marginal: at least 7% inc. (7% - 7.99%) x
2013-14 73.98 54.13 2pts. - Average: at least 8% Inc. (8% - 9.99%)30%
2014-15 66.44 38.42 3pts. - High: at least 10% Inc. (10% and above)
Ave % of Increase 44.20 44.20 1.35Subtotal:
0pt. - Negative Results (0.99% and below) 1pt. - Marginal: at least 1% inc. (1% - 6.99%) 2pts. - Average: at least 7% inc. (7% - 9.99%) 3pts. - High: at least 10% inc. (10% and above)
Total En. EoSY
Total En. EoSY +
Dropout/sTotal Dropout
SYnRating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result
Baseline: 7.06 (Constant)
Y4 Graduates SYn YR1 En. SYn-3
YR1 En. SYn-3
PART II: COMPUTATION FOR VALIDATED SBM ASSESSMENT SCORES (40%)
SBM Principles Cases Score Weight Weight
Leadership 5 15 30% 3.00 x 0.3 =Curriculum and Learning 7 18 30% 2.57 x 0.3 =Accountability 5 13 25% 2.60 x 0.25 =Resource Management 5 15 15% 3.00 x 0.15 =
TOTAL 100% Subtotal
PART III: COMPUTATION FOR FINAL RATINGAreas Weight Computation Results
A . Performance Improvement 60% 1.43 x 0.6 0.86B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40% 2.77 x 0.4 1.11
TOTAL 100% TOTAL RATING: 1.97
Descriptive Rating: MATURING
Prepared by: Noted by:
Signature Over Printed Name Name of School HeadPosition: Position: ____________________________
Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle (Average Scores)
SCORING MATRIX FOR THE REVISED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL
BAROBO
Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result
0
0.08
1.351.43
Rating/ Equivalent Pts./ Computation/ Result Baseline: 7.06 (Constant)
Result
0.90.770.650.45
2.77
4.64Results
1.97
MATURING
Pls. retype.