Šárka cepáková, sandra stachová leader: mgr. markéta foldynová

12
Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta Foldynová 28. 07. 2011 Protein glycosylations in cyanobacterium Synechocystis Schola ludus

Upload: tave

Post on 23-Feb-2016

125 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Schola ludus. 28 . 07. 2011. Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta Foldynová. Protein glycosylations in cyanobacterium Synechocystis. Introduction. Subject of research - post- translational modification - glycosylation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová

Leader: Mgr. Markéta Foldynová

28. 07. 2011

Protein glycosylations in cyanobacterium Synechocystis

Schola ludus

Page 2: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

Introduction

• Subject of research - post-translational modification - glycosylation

• Glycosylation: attachment of glycans to proteins (N-linked glycans, O-linked glycans)

• Model organism – cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

• Differences in cultivation: in the presence of glucose X autotrophic cultivation

Page 3: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

Hypotheses and aimsHow does glucose affect cultivation of cyanobacteria Synechocystis?

• Effect on the biosynthesis of proteins and pigments

• Reason: alternative glycosylation of an enzyme or regulatory factor

• Expectation: different glycosylation pattern in some proteins after cultivation in presence of glucose

Page 4: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

Methods IIsolation of glycoproteins from cell extract: Glycoprotein Isolation Kit, ConA

Fig.1: Purification column

Separation: SDS-PAGE electrophoresis

Page 5: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

Methods II

Gel staining:

• Coomassie Blue Staining• Pierce Glycoprotein Staining KitPhotographs taken by sensitive CCD camera

Page 6: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

Results

Page 7: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

a) Comparison glucose cultivation X autotrophic cultivation

Cell membrane fraction I

Fig.2: Autotrophic cultivation (SDS-PAGE, coomassie) Fig.3: Glucose cultivation (SDS-PAGE, coomassie)

kDa250

130

95

72

55

36

281710

Page 8: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

b) Comparison glucose cultivation X autotrophic cultivation

Cell membrane fraction II

Fig.4: Autotrophic cultivation (SDS-PAGE, coomassie) Fig.5: Glucose cultivation (SDS-PAGE, coomassie)

Page 9: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

c) Comparison glucose cultivation X autotrophic cultivation

Soluble proteins

Fig.6: Autotrophic cultivation (SDS-PAGE, coomassie) Fig.7: Glucose cultivation (SDS-PAGE, coomassie)

Page 10: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

d) Comparison glucose cultivation X autotrophic cultivation

Y. H. Kim et al. (2009) Proteomics

Page 11: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

Conclusions

• Some of N-glycosylated proteins are unique in absence / presence of glucose and will be determined by MASS SPECTROMETRY.

• We detected a few proteins that are O- or N-glycosylated in Synechocystis.

Page 12: Šárka Cepáková, Sandra Stachová Leader: Mgr. Markéta  Foldynová

Acknowledgements Thanks to Markéta Foldynová and MBÚ

Třeboň Thanks to Schola ludus and European social

fund and budget of the Czech republic (CZ.1.07/2.3.00/09.0203)