santa ana unified school district 2011 cst enter school name version: intermediate

24
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate

Upload: sabina-west

Post on 14-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Santa Ana Unified School District

2011 CST

Enter School Name

Version: Intermediate

Presentation GoalsPresentation Goals

SAUSD CST Highlights and Data Mat

Our School’s CST ResultsAYP and APINext StepsHelpful Reports on

DataDirector to View STAR Results

Reflecting on last year . . . Reflecting on last year . . .

In departments, What were your goals last year for

the CST?What did you do to achieve those

goals?

CST ScoresCST Scores2011 CST Results

Q: Q: HowHow are the CST results are the CST results reported to schools and reported to schools and

teachers?teachers? Site administrators and staff

receive CST results of:◦Individual students◦Classes◦Grade levels◦Schools◦District◦County◦And, overall state performance

SAUSD Data MatsSAUSD Data Mats

Work with a partner to examine the Data Mat . . .

What do you notice within your subject area/s and grades? What do you notice about other subject areas?

What patterns do you notice overall from elementary through high school in the various subject areas?

Santa Ana HighlightsSanta Ana HighlightsEnglish–Language Arts We had more than 900 additional students score proficient and advanced from

2009 to 2011 in English Language Arts; a 5.9% overall increase from 2009. Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in English Language Arts

increased from 2% to 5% in Grades 2-5, 7-8, and 10-11 from the prior year. Percent proficient and advanced increased 5% in English Language Arts in

Grades 3 and 7 from the prior year.

Mathematics In Mathematics, we had more than 1,800 additional students score proficient

and advanced from 2009 to 2011; a 8.5% overall increase from 2009. Grade 4 exceeded the 2011 NCLB Target (68.5%) in Mathematics for 2011. Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in Mathematics

increased from 2% to 8% in Grades 2-7 from the prior year. Increased percent proficient and advanced in Algebra I (Grades 10-11),

Geometry (Grade 10), and Algebra II (Grade 11) from the prior year. There was an increase of approximately 250 students in Grade 10 Algebra II

while maintaining the same percent proficient and advanced from the prior year.

Santa Ana Highlights Santa Ana Highlights (cont.)(cont.)

History-Social ScienceThere was an increase in the percent proficient and

advanced in History-Social Science; furthermore, there is a general trend of yearly increases since 2007 in Grade 8, 10, and 11.

Science The number of students scoring proficient and advanced

in Grade 5 Science increased by 3% from the prior year. Overall growth in the percent proficient and advanced in

Biology (Grades 10-11) increased from 2% to 4% from the prior year.

There was a 3% increase in Grade 10 Chemistry and a 6% increase in Grade 11 Physics in percent proficient and advanced from the prior year.

Our School’s 3-Year CST Our School’s 3-Year CST Summary ReportSummary Report

What do you notice?Are these results what you expected

based on what you did?

Insert your school’s 3 –Year CST Summary Report Here

Now, let’s go deeper . . . Now, let’s go deeper . . .

Look at your subject and grade reports based on the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 CSTs

Look within subject and also look outside your subject areaWhat do you notice?What questions might you have?

Next Steps:Next Steps:

Think about what you discussed and your feedback from your colleagues

Recommendation:Discuss within your dept. and with your administrator to determine your goals for this year

State and Federal State and Federal Accountability systemsAccountability systems

Our Accountability System Our Accountability System Federal Accountability

•Status model

•Every school & district has the same target. Targets reach 100% proficient by 2013-2014

•Type of rating=Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Meets or does not meet AYP

State Accountability

•Growth model with a statewide performance goal of 800

•Schools and all subgroups have growth goals.

•Type of rating=Academic Performance Index (API)

Scale of 200-1000

Source: California Department of Education (CDE)

The CST is used for both Accountability Systems.

The AYP also includes CAPA, CMA (All Schools) & CAHSEE (For High Schools)

Adequate Yearly Progress - AYPAdequate Yearly Progress - AYPAcademic Performance Index - APIAcademic Performance Index - API

Components of AYP

• Participation rate• Percent Proficient• API• Graduation rate

All Proficient and Advanced Students Count on your score

Components of API

• Advanced 1000• Proficient 875• Basic 700• Below Basic 500• Far Below Basic 200

Every Student Counts

AYP Percent ProficientAYP Percent ProficientAnnual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives

(AMOs)(AMOs)

Elementary and Middle Schools are based on:

The California Standards Tests (CSTs)

The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities

California Modified Assessment (CMA)

High Schools are based on:

Results from the Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) administration

The California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for students with severe cognitive disabilities in English-language arts and mathematics in grade 10

NCLB prohibits the use of norm-referenced test data in measuring student achievement

Annual Measurable Annual Measurable ObjectivesObjectives

To achieve AYP, a school must meet or exceed Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) schoolwide and for each student subgroup:

Economically disadvantaged Major ethnic and racial groups Students with disabilities English language learners

AMOs: English language artsAMOs: English language artsElementary and Middle SchoolsElementary and Middle Schools

89.2%

24.4%13.6%

67.6%56.8%

46.0%35.2%

78.4%

100.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2001-2002

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

AMOs: MathAMOs: MathElementary / Middle SchoolsElementary / Middle Schools

37.0%47.5%

58.0%68.5%

79.0%89.5%

26.5%16.0%

100.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2001-2002

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

API Test WeightsAPI Test Weights

You may want to insert your KDS API and AYP Reports here. If you are unable to locate them, please contact SAUSD Dept. of Research and Evaluation

DataDirector: What’s DataDirector: What’s NewNew

Suggested Pre-Built Reports for Suggested Pre-Built Reports for Viewing STAR Results on DataDirectorViewing STAR Results on DataDirector

Report Name:

What is it? What does it include?

Notes:

CST Scaled Scores

Easy to read snapshot of individual student performance on a CST as they relate to the performance band.

•Identifies students who are on the margins of advancing or falling-back a proficiency level•Filters and identifies students by performance level or scaled score, e..g. I only want to view students who were on the “bubble,” 340 and above on the CST ELA for grade 9.

CST Cluster Scores

Identifies performance for individual students, teachers, district and state on each of the strands tested on the CST.

•Provides pie charts and bar graphs on classroom averages, school averages, district averages as well as performance level distributions. Important: Remember to use the Summary Options menu . Click on the“Include Teacher Summary” option to view the pie charts.

Pivot Table

CST or CELDT student performance comparison over a 2 year period. Creates pivot tables that identify “sliders, gainers, stickers.”

See next slide

CST Percent Proficient Trend Analysis

Multi-tiered analysis of students proficient on the CST. Includes bar graphs and charts of students’ performance over time. Includes disaggregated subgroup performance.

Compare growth trends in number of students proficient or at the varying proficiency levels for multiple years.

Select “Cohort Report” to see only students who took any of the selected assessments. Select “Limited Cohort Report” for students who took all selected assessments. The “Year to Year Comparison” compares students and their test results from one academic year to another.

Contact InformationContact Information

Santa Ana Unified School DistrictDepartment of Research and

Evaluation(714) 558-5850 Phone

(714) 558-5573 Fax