sa'dya repopt the determination of optimum mounting flat … optim mount... · tracking...

42
1 - . €n ..* n_j +> -9 5r7 CI -- - SA'DYA REPOPT SAND85- 1251 Unlimited Release UC-63 Printed January 1986 The Determination of Optimum Mounting Configurations for Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules Based on a Structured Field \ Experiment and Simulated Results From PVFORM, a Photovoltaic System III~IEII;I~AII~~~~ Performance Model 8232-211063587 David F. Menicucci Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 for the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC04-76DP00789

Upload: others

Post on 17-Oct-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

1 -.€n ..* n _ j + > - 9

5r7 CI - -

- SA'DYA REPOPT SAND85- 1251 Unlimited Release UC-63 Printed January 1986

The Determination of Optimum Mounting Configurations for Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules Based on a Structured Field

\

Experiment and Simulated Results From PVFORM, a Photovoltaic System III~IEII;I~AII~~~~~I~~~~IIII~I~~~III~~AIIIIII~IIIIIA Performance Model 8232-211063587

David F. Menicucci

Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 for the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC04-76DP00789

I

Page 2: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

SAND85- 1251 Unlimited Release

Printed January 1986

Distribution Category UC - 63

The Determination of Optimum Mounting Configurations for Flat-Plate Photovoltaic

Modules Based on a Structured Field Experiment and Simulated Results From

PVFORM, a Photovoltaic System Performance Model

David F. Menicucci Sandia National Laboratories

Albuquerque, NM 87185

Abstract The performance of a photovoltaic (PV) system is affected by its mounting configuration. The optimal configuration is unclear because of lack of experience and data. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque (SNLA), has conducted a controlled field experiment to compare four types of the most common module mountings. The data from the experiment were used to verify the accuracy of PVFORM, a new computer program that simulates P V performance. PVFORM was then used to simulate the performance of identical P V modules on different mounting configurations a t 10 sites throughout the L J S . This report describes the module mounting configurations, the experimental methods used, the specialized statistical techniques used in the analysis, and the final results of the effort. The module mounting configurations are rank ordered a t each site according to their annual and seasonal energy production performance, and each is briefly discussed in terms of its advantages and disadvantages in various applications.

Page 3: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE This report was repared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Eovernment. Neither the United States Govern- ment nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their emplo ees, makes any warranty, ex- press or implied, or assumes any legal liaxility or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, prod- uct, or process disclosed, or represents that ita use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply ita endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed here- in do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof or any of their contractors or subcontractors.

Printed in the United States of America Available from National Technical Information Service US. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161

NTIS price codes Printed copy: A03. - I”:--..-: - 1

Page 4: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

CONTSNTS

I N T R O D U C T I O N

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGd

D A T A C O L L E C T I O N A N D ANALYSIS

DISCUSSION

CONCLUSIONS

REFERENCES

APPENDIX -- P l o t s of M o n t h l y E n e r g y P e r f o r m a n c e

F i g u r e

1

2

3

4

ILLUSTRATIONS

C o n f i g u r a t i o n T e s t M a t r i x

Modu le E f f i c i e n c y C o m p a r i s o n

A c t u a l a n d P r e d i c t e d d c Power ! Two-Axis T r a c k i n g

PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , A l b u q u e r q u e , N M

TABLES

T a b l e

1

2

3

R e s u l t s of S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s o f M e a s u r e d a n d S i m u l a t e d ( i n P a r e n t h e s e s ) F u l l Day T o t a l E n e r g y P r o d u c t i o n

Summary of S i m u l a t e d Modu le M o u n t i n g A n n u a l P e r f o r m a n c e C o m p a r i s o n s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n t h e U.S.

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d Modu le M o u n t i n g S p r i n g P e r f o r m a n c e C o m p a r i s o n s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n t h e U . S .

P a g e

7

8 10

1 3 25

2 9

31

9

11

1 4

1 6

13

18

19

5

Page 5: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

TABLES ( C o n t i n u e d )

T a b l e P a g e

4 Summary of S i m u l a t e d Module M o u p t i n g Summer

5 Summary o f S i m u l a t e d Module M o u n t i n g F a l l

6 Summary of S i m u l a t e d Module M o u n t i n g W i n t e r

7 Summary o f S i m u l a t e d Module M o u n t i n g C o m p a r i q o n s

P e r f o r m a n c e C o m p a r i s o n s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U.S. 20

Performance C o m p a r i s o n s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U . S . 2 1

P e r f o r m a n c e C o m p a r i s o n s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U . S . 2 2

A n n u a l I n s o l a t i o n A v a i l a b i l i t i e s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U.S. - A n n u a l ( kWh/m2 ) 2 3

10

11

8 Summary o f S i m u l a t e d A v a i l a b l e I n s o l a t i o n f o r D i f f e r e n t F l a t - P l a t e T r a c k i n g C o n f i g u r a t i o n s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U . S . - S p r i n g (kWh/m2) 2 3

D i f f e r e n t F l a t - P l a t e T r a c k i n g C o n f i g u r a t i o n s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U.S. - Summer (kWh/m2) 24

D i f f e r e n t F l a t - P l a t e T r a c k i n g C o n f i g u r a t i o n s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U.S. - F a l l (kWh/m2) 2 4

D i f f e r e n t F l a t - P l a t e T r a c k i n g C o n f i g u r a t i o n s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U . S . - W i n t e r (kWh/m2)

9 Summary o f S i m u l a t e d A v a i l a b l e I n s o l a t i o n f o r

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d A v a i l a b l e I n s o l a t i o n f o r

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d A v a i l a b l e I n s o l a t i o n f o r

25

6

Page 6: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

THE DETERMINATION OF OPTIMUM M O U N T I N G CONFIGURATIONS FOR FLAT-PLATE PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES

BASED ON A STRUCTURED FIELD EXPERIMENT

A PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MODEL A N D S I M U L A T E D RESULTS FROM PVFORMt

I N T R O D U C T I O N

The m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n o f a PV s y s t e m a f f e c t s i t s p e r f o r -

mance . E x p e r i e n c e w i t h f i e l d e d PV s y s t e m s , f o r e x a m p l e , h a s shown

t h a t t r a c k i n g f l a t - p l a t e s y s t e m s c a n p r o d u c e c o n s i d e r a b l y more e n e r g y

t h a n c a n f i x e d - t i l t a r r a y s . P a s t s t u d i e s h a v e shown t h a t i n some

s o u t h w e s t e r n l o c a t i o n s ( e . g . I A l b u q u e r q u e , N e w M e x i c o ) I a t w o - a x i s

t r a c k i n g s y s t e m may i n t e r c e p t u p t o 30% more e n e r g y t h a n a f i x e d a r r a y

t i l t e d t o w a r d t h e s o u t h a t a n a n g l e e q u a l t o t h e l a t i t u d e o f t h e

l o c a t i o n (1). The a d d i t i o n a l e n e r g y p r o d u c e d b y t h e t r a c k i n g s y s t e m

may o f f s e t t h e i n c r e a s e d cos t o f t h e two-ax i s t r a c k i n g m e c h a n i s m .

S i n c e A l b u q u e r q u e ' s c l imate i s v e r y c o n d u c i v e t o s o l a r a p p l i c a t i o n s ,

t h e s e p o s i t i v e e f f e c t s may n o t b e r e p e a t a b l e i n o t h e r r e g i o n s . A t a n y

s p e c i f i c l o c a t i o n , i t i s n o t e n t i r e l y c l e a r w h i c h c o n f i g u r a t i o n w i l l

y i e l d t h e l o w e s t c o s t / p e r f o r m a n c e r a t i o . F o r example, t w o - a x i s s y s -

t e m s c o s t more t h a n e i t h e r o n e - a x i s o r f i x e d s y s t e m s , b u t t h e y a l s o

p r o d u c e more e n e r g y . The r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n t w o - a x i s , o n e - a x i s , a n d

f i x e d - t i l t s y s t e m s i s n o t f u l l y known b e c a u s e t o o few o f t h e s e s y s t e m s

h a v e b e e n f i e l d e d t o p r o v i d e a d e q u a t e s t a t i s t i c s c o v e r i n g t h e many

c o m b i n a t i o n s o f m o u n t i n g t y p e , l o c a l w e a t h e r , a n d s y s t e m c o s t . The

l i m i t e d d a t a a v a i l a b l e f r o m o p e r a t i o n a l s y s t e m s , h o w e v e r , s u g g e s t t h a t

t r a c k i n g s y s t e m s a r e p r o d u c i n g more e n e r g y t h a n was p r e d i c t e d . Conse-

q u e n t l y , t h e most c o s t - e f f e c t i v e PV m o d u l e m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n f o r

a n y s p e c i f i c s i t e r e m a i n s unknown.

T h i s u n c e r t a i n t y i s a p r o b l e m f o r a l l PV s y s t e m d e s i g n e r s a n d

g r e a t l y i n c r e a s e s t h e r i s k o f f i e l d i n g a s y s t e m t h a t i s n o t c o s t

7

Page 7: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

e f f e c t i v e . A s a c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e s o l u t i o n of t h i s problem, S a n d i a N a t i o n a l L a b o r a t o r i e s , A l b u q u e r q u e (SNLA) , a t i t s P h o t o v o l t a i c

Advanced S y s t e m s T e s t F a c i l i t y (PASTF) h a s c o n d u c t e d a c o n t r o l l e d

f i e l d e x p e r i m e n t t h a t compares t h e p e r f o r m a n c e of f o u r commonly u s e d

m o d u l e m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n s :

1. F i x e d f i x e d t i l t toward t h e s o u t h w i t h t h e t i l t a n g l e e q u a l t o t h e l a t i t u d e , a s i s common p rac t i ce i n t h e

PV communi ty 2. Two-Axis t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g

3 . N S s i n g l e - a x i s t r a c k i n g w i t h t h e a x i s h o r i z o n t a l a n d

o r i e n t e d n o r t h t o s o u t h

4. EW s i n g l e - a x i s t r a c k i n g w i t h t h e a x i s h o r i z o n t a l a n d

o r i e n t e d e a s t t o w e s t .

T h e r e s u l t s o f t h i s e x p e r i m e n t were u s e d t o v e r i f y t h e a c c u r a c y o f

PVFORM, S N L A ' s n e w l y d e v e l o p e d c o m p u t e r s i m u l a t i o n model f o r P V per- f o r m a n c e . PVFORM w a s t h e n u s e d t o e s t ima te t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e

f o u r m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n s a t e i g h t d i f f e r e n t s i t e s r e p r e s e n t i n g major c l i m a t i c r e g i o n s i n t h e U.S.

EXPERIMENTAL D E S I G N

I d e a l l y r t h e p e r f o r m a n c e of a l l f o u r c o n f i g u r a t i o n s w o u l d be

m e a s u r e d c o n c u r r e n t l y . However , hardware l i m i t a t i o n s a t PASTF a l lowed

c o n c u r r e n t t e s t i n g o f o n l y two c o n f i g u r a t i o n s . S i x c o m p a r i s o n t e s t s

( a l l p o s s i b l e c o m b i n a t i o n s o f t h e f o u r c o n f i g u r a t i o n s t e s t ed t w o a t a t i m e ) were made. F i g u r e 1 o u t l i n e s t h e c o m p a r i s o n m a t r i x . I n e a c h

c o m p a r i s o n t e s t r t w o d i f f e r e n t m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n s w i t h i d e n t i c a l

PV m o d u l e s were tes ted c o n c u r r e n t l y s ide -by- s ide . P e r f o r m a n c e d a t a

were recorded from e a c h m o d u l e e v e r y m i n u t e b e t w e e n t h e h o u r s o f

9:30 am a n d 3 : O O pm. T e s t s were c o n d u c t e d o n c l e a r d a y s t o e l i m i n a t e

b i a s r e s u l t i n g from t h e day-to-day w e a t h e r v a r i a t i o n s . To e l i m i n a t e

b i a s i n t h e p a i r - s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s r a r andom number t a b l e was u s e d t o d e t e r m i n e t h e o r d e r i n w h i c h each o f t h e c o m p a r i s o n t e s t s was r u n .

A f t e r o n e complete s e t of s i x c o m p a r i s o n tests w a s c o m p l e t e d , a s e c o n d

s e t w a s r u n ( a g a i n i n r andom o r d e r ) t o i n c r e a s e t h e sample s i z e a n d t o

e l i m i n a t e p o s s i b l e b i a s d u e t o s e a s o n a l w e a t h e r c h a n g e s t h a t m i g h t

o c c u r d u r i n g t h e t e s t per iod .

8

Page 8: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

CONHGURATlON # 1 2 3 4

1

2

3

4

F i g u r e 1. C o n f i g u r a t i o n T e s t M a t r i x

The s t a t i s t i c a l model u s e d i n t h e a n a l y s i s o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l

d a t a w a s

x ( i r j ) = XBAR + D ( i ) + C ( J ) + E R R ( i r j )

w h e r e

x ( i I j ) is t h e mean e n e r g y p e f o r m a n c e f o r t h e i t h system i n t h e j t h c o n f i g u r a t i o n ,

XBAR i s t h e g r a n d m e a n r

D ( i ) i s t h e d a y e f f e c t f o r t h e i t h s y s t e m r

C( j ) i s t h e c o n f i g u r a t i o n e f f e c t f o r t h e j t h c o n f i g u r a t i o n r

E R R ( i r j ) is a r a n d o m e r r o r ,

i=l t o 1 2 p a i r s ( 6 p a i r s repea ted t w i c e ) ,

j=1 t o 4 c o n f i g u r a t i o n s .

A p p l i c a t i o n o f t h i s s t a t i s t i c a l model made it p o s s i b l e t o es t imate t h e

c o n f i g u r a t i o n e f f e c t s a n d t h e d a y e f f e c t s , t o r a n k t h e s e e f f e c t s r a n d

t o a s s e s s t h e s t a t i s t i c a l d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n them. A s a r e s u l t r e a c h c o n f i g u r a t i o n c o u l d be r a n k o r d e r e d w i t h r e s p e c t t o e n e r g y p e r f o r -

mance . F o l l o w i n g t h e s t a t i s t i c a l a n a l y s i s r t h e PVFORM c o m p u t e r s imu-

l a t i o n mode l w a s v e r i f i e d b y c o m p a r i n g i t s p r e d i c t i o n s w i t h t h e t e s t

9

Page 9: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

r e s u l t s . PVFORM was t h e n used t o e s t ima te a n n u a l e n e r g y a t a number o f d i f f e r e n t s i t e s i n t h e U.S.

DATA C O L L E C T I O N A N D A N A L Y S I S

A t t h e h e a r t of t h i s e x p e r i m e n t w a s t h e c o m p a r i s o n of t h e pe r fo r -

mance o f t w o i n d i v i d u a l PV m o d u l e s m o u n t e d i n d i f f e r e n t c o n f i g u r a - t i o n s . Of p r i m a r y i m p o r t a n c e w a s t h e s e l e c t i o n o f two m o d u l e s whose

p e r f o r m a n c e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s were a s s i m i l a r a s p o s s i b l e w i t h i n t h e r a n g e of e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s t h a t m i g h t be e n c o u n t e r e d d u r i n g t h e

c o m p a r i s o n r u n s . F o r t h i s r e a s o n r g r e a t ca re was t a k e n i n t h e se lec-

t i o n of t h e t w o m o d u l e s t o be u s e d i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t . M o d u l e s t h a t

appeared t o h a v e s i m i l a r p e r f o r m a n c e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s were s e l e c t e d

f r o m a f i e l d e d a r r a y o n t h e b a s i s of m e a s u r e m e n t s o f s h o r t c i r c u i t

c u r r e n t a n d o p e n c i r c u i t v o l t a g e . The m o d u l e s were t h e n m o u n t e d o n

s e p a r a t e t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m s a t t h e S N L A PASTFr w h e r e t h e i r

p e r f o r m a n c e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s were m e a s u r e d . The p e r f o r m a n c e o f e a c h

m o d u l e w a s recorded e v e r y m i n u t e . P o w e r r p l a n e o f a r r a y i n s o l a t i o n r

m o d u l e t e m p e r a t u r e r a n d t h e a m b i e n t w e a t h e r c o n d i t i o n s were r e c o r d e d .

T h e s e tes ts r a n g e d f r o m 1 t o 3 d a y s a n d were c o n d u c t e d u n d e r c lear s k y

c o n d i t i o n s .

The e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y of b o t h m o d u l e s w a s c o m p u t e d a n d t h e e f f i -

c i e n c y d i f f e r e n c e s f o r e a c h m i n u t e o f t h e t e s t were t h e n p l o t t e d i n

h i s t o g r a m form t o d e t e r m i n e i f t h e d a t a d i s t r i b u t i o n s were n o r m a l .

T h i s s t e p was i m p o r t a n t b e c a u s e t h e s u b s e q u e n t s t a t i s t i c a l t e s t s a s s u m e d t h e d i f f e r e n c e s were n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d a b o u t a z e r o mean.

I f t h e d a t a d i s t r i b u t i o n s were n o t n o r m a l r t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e l e v e l o f

t h e t e s t r e s u l t s w o u l d be unknown. I n e v e r y t e s t r t h e d a t a a p p e a r e d

t o b e n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d .

S t a n d a r d t t e s t s were a p p l i e d t o t h e s e d a t a t o t e s t t h e n u l l h y p o t h e s i s t h a t t h e p e r f o r m a n c e d i f f e r e n c e s w e r e e q u a l t o z e r o . I f

t h e s t a t i s t i c a l t e s t s r e p e a t e d l y i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e d i f f e r e n c e s were

s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t f r o m z e r o r a n o t h e r s e t of m o d u l e s was se-

l e c t e d r a n d t h e s t a t i s t i c a l t e s t s r e p e a t e d . F o u r d i f f e r e n t m o d u l e s

were t e s t ed o v e r s e v e r a l w e e k s u n t i l t w o m o d u l e s were f o u n d whose

10

Page 10: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e s were s u f f i c i e n t l y c l o s e so t h a t t h e n u l l h y p o t h e -

s is c o u l d n o t be r e j ec t ed a t t h e 5% l e v e l o f s i g n i f i c a n c e . T h e s e t w o

m o d u l e s were t e s t e d f o r 2 w e e k s u n d e r v a r i o u s w e a t h e r c o n d i t i o n s t o e n s u r e t h a t t h e i r p e r f o r m a n c e i n d i f f e r i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s were s i m i l a r . All o f t h e 1-day t e s t s i n d i c a t e d no s t a t i s t i c a l l y

s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n t h e m o d u l e s . F i g u r e 2 i s a t y p i c a l t i m e p l o t of t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n e f f i c i e n c i e s b e t w e e n t h e t w o m o d u l e s .

As c a n be s e e n , t h e a v e r a g e d i f f e r e n c e i n e f f i c i e n c y i s a b o u t e q u a l t o

z e r o l a n d t h e d a t a appear t o be n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d . The m i s s i n 9

values a r e d u e t o i n s t r u m e n t f a i l u r e s . The t v a l u e c o m p u t e d f o r t h e

s e t of d i f f e r e n c e s o n t h i s d a y i s 0.5839! w e l l b e l o w t h e t a b l e d v a l u e

of 1.96 ( 2 - t a i l e d t e s t for g r e a t e r t h a n 1 2 0 o b s e r v a t i o n s a t t h e 5% l e v e l of s i g n i f i c a n c e ) . Thus ! t h e n u l l h y p o t h e s i s t h a t t h e mean d i f -

f e r e n c e b e t w e e n t h e e f f i c i e n c i e s o f t h e two m o d u l e s is z e r o c a x n o t b e

r e j ec t ed ! a n d t h e m o d u l e s a r e a s s u m e d t o h a v e n e a r l y i d e n t i c a l p e r f o r -

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s .

0.6

TIME OF DAY (HOURS)

F i g u r e 2. Module E f f i c i e n c y C o m p a r i s o n

Page 11: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

The c o n f i g u r a t i o n t e s t s b e g a n w i t h t h e r andom s e l e c t i o n o f a p a i r o f c o n f i g u r a t i o n s f o r t e s t i n g . The f i r s t t e s t i n v o l v e d a f i x e d - t i l t

s y s t e m m e a s u r e d a g a i n s t a t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m . The t e s t o f t h e s e

two m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n s was r e p e a t e d f o r a s u f f i c i e n t number o f

d a y s t o e n s u r e t h a t s u f f i c i e n t d a t a were recorded u n d e r r e l a t i v e l y

c l e a r s k y c o n d i t i o n s . The m o d u l e s were t h e n r e m o u n t e d i n d i f f e r e n t

c o n f i g u r a t i o n s , a s o u t l i n e d i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l p l a n , a n d t h e d a t a

c o l l e c t i o n p r o c e s s was r e p e a t e d . A f t e r a l l 6 c o n f i g u r a t i o n c o m p a r i -

s o n s were t e s t e d , t h e e n t i r e p r o c e d u r e w a s r e p e a t e d , r e s u l t i n g i n a s e c o n d s e t o f d a t a f o r e a c h c o n f i g u r a t i o n c o m p a r i s o n a n d a t o t a l o f 1 2

sets of c o m p a r i s o n d a t a a v a i l a b l e f o r a n a l y s i s . The d a t a were s t o r e d

o n t h e S N L A m a i n f r a m e c o m p u t e r s t o r a g e s y s t e m . ( A c c i d e n t a l loss o f t w o o f t h e d a t a s e t s , d u e t o c o m p u t e r h a r d w a r e f a i l u r e , w a s c o n s i d e r e d

i n s i g n i f i c a n t a s b o t h se t s were g e n e r a t e d d u r i n g t h e r e p e a t e d p o r t i o n

o f t h e t e s t i n g . M o r e o v e r , a l l t h e c o n f i g u r a t i o n c o m p a r i s o n s were

r e p r e s e n t e d a t l e a s t o n c e , a n d f o u r o f them were r e p r e s e n t e d twice . )

D u r i n g t h e c o n f i g u r a t i o n c o m p a r i s o n t e s t s , d a t a were recorded

e a c h m i n u t e . The t o t a l e n e r g y d e r i v e d f r o m a g i v e n c o n f i g u r a t i o n was c a l c u l a t e d from t h e m i n u t e - b y - m i n u t e power m e a s u r e m e n t s t a k e n d u r i n g

t h e t e s t . A l l t e s t s were r u n f rom 9:30 a m u n t i l 3 : O O pm a n d , t h e r e -

f o r e l t h e e n e r g y t o t a l s f r o m e a c h c o n f i g u r a t i o n were d i r e c t l y compar-

a b l e a n d were u s e d t o a s s e s s o v e r a l l d a i l y p e r f o r m a n c e o f e a c h m o d u l e

m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n . T h e s e f u l l - d a y e n e r g y t o t a l s were i n p u t t o

t h e s t a t i s t i c a l model. From t h i s a n a l y s i s , a r a n k o r d e r i n g o f t h e

r e l a t i v e p e r f o r m a n c e o f e a c h c o n f i g u r a t i o n w a s made ( T a b l e 1 ) . I n

Table 1 t h e " l e a s t s q u a r e mean" i s a d i m e n s i o n l e s s e s t i m a t o r o f t h e

r e l a t i v e e n e r g y p e r f o r m a n c e a d j u s t e d f o r w e a t h e r d i f f e r e n c e s o n t h e

d i f f e r e n t t e s t d a y s . The "P v a l u e " i s t h e p r o b a b i l i t y o f a n e r r o r i n

j u d g e m e n t i f i t i s d e c i d e d t h a t a n y two c o n f i g u r a t i o n s d i d n o t p e r f o r m

e q u a l l y . F o r e x a m p l e , t h e P v a l u e o f 0.0145 i n t h e t a b l e i s u s e d t o compare t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f a t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n w i t h a n EW c o n f i g u r a t i o n . I n t h i s c a s e , t h e p r o b a b i l i t y i s 1.45% t h a t a n

e r r o r i n j u d g e m e n t wou ld b e made i f i t i s a s s u m e d t h a t t h e t w o s y s t e m s

p r o d u c e d d i f f e r e n t a m o u n t s o f e n e r g y . The v e r y s m a l l P v a l u e s s u p p o r t

t h e a s s u m p t i o n t h a t t h e p e r f o r m a n c e l e v e l s o f t h e f o u r c o n f i g u r a t i o n s

a r e s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t a t t h i s p a r t i c u l a r t i m e of t h e y e a r .

12

Page 12: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

T a b l e 1

R e s u l t s of S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s of Measured a n d S i m u l a t e d ( i n P a r e n t h e s e s )

F u l l Day T o t a l E n e r g y P r o d u c t i o n

Rank M o u n t i n g L e a s t S q u a r e P V a l u e s O r d e r C o n f i g u r a t i o n Mean EW N S F i x e d

1 T w o - A x i s 35.38 .0145 .0007 .OOOl (35.34) ( . 0 0 7 8 ) ( . 0 0 0 7 ) ( .0001)

2 EW

3 N S

4 F i x e d

32.61 -- .0481 . O O O l (32 .26) ( . 0443) ( .0001)

-- . O O O l 30.24 -- (30.30) ( . O O O l )

22.55 (22 .82 )

The t e s t s were c o n d u c t e d i n l a t e f a l l , a time when t h e s o l a r c o n d i t i o n s a r e s i m i l a r t o t h o s e i n t h e s p r i n g . B u t b e c a u s e c o n d i t i o n s

i n l a t e f a l l a r e n o t s i m i l a r t o t h o s e i n summer o r w i n t e r r c o n c l u s i o n s a b o u t t h e r e l a t i v e p e r f o r m a n c e of e a c h m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n may b e

a p p l i c a b l e o n l y f o r t h e f a l l a n d s p r i n g p o r t i o n s o f t h e y e a r . F o r

r e l i a b l e c o n c l u s i o n s a b o u t t h e a n n u a l p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e f o u r m o u n t i n g

c o n f i g u r a t i o n s , t h e e x p e r i m e n t s h o u l d be r e p e a t e d d u r i n g summer a n d

w i n t e r c o n d i t i o n s . T i m e a n d m o n e t a r y c o n s i d e r a t i o n s , h o w e v e r r make

t h i s o p t i o n imprac t i ca l . A s a r e a s o n a b l e a l t e r n a t i v e t o a d d i t i o n a l

f i e l d t e s t i n g r t h e d a t a f r o m t h i s e x p e r i m e n t were u s e d t o v e r i f y t h e

a c c u r a c y o f PVFORM, w h i c h w a s t h e n u s e d t o s i m u l a t e t h e c o m p a r i s o n

t e s t s f o r a full y e a r . PVFORM was t h e n u s e d t o s i m u l a t e t h e compari-

s o n tests i n v a r i o u s c l i m a t i c r e g i o n s t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u n t r y . U s i n g

t h i s a p p r o a c h r c o n c l u s i o n s were d r a w n a b o u t t h e r e l a t i v e p e r f o r m a n c e

o f e a c h of t h e f o u r m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n s f o r w i d e s p r e a d g e o g r a p h -

i c a l r e g i o n s .

D I S C U S S ION

PVFORM ( 2 ) w a s d e v e l o p e d a t S N L A a n d r e p r e s e n t s t h e b e s t a v a i l -

a b l e a p p r o a c h e s t o m o d e l l i n g PV p e r f o r m a n c e . T h i s code i n c o r p o r a t e s

1 3

Page 13: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

t h e u s e of t h e a n i s o t r o p i c d i f f u s e s o l a r r a d i a t i o n model d e v e l o p e d by P e r e z ( 3 ) a n d a t h e r m a l p e r f o r m a n c e model d e v e l o p e d by F u e n t e s ( 4 ) .

The P e r e z model is u s e d t o es t imate t o t a l s o l a r r a d i a t i o n o n t i l t e d

s u r f a c e s based on m e a s u r e m e n t s o f t o t a l h o r i z o n t a l a n d d i r e c t n o r m a l

r a d i a t i o n . So lar E n e r g y R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e t e s t ed t h e P e r e z m o d e l a t

v a r i o u s l o c a t i o n s t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u n t r y a n d f o u n d i t t o be a c c u r a t e

t o w i t h i n a b o u t 4% ( 5 ) . The t h e r m a l modelr t e s t ed i n s e v e r a l o f

SNLA’s PV f i e l d t e s t s i t e s r i s g e n e r a l l y a c c u r a t e t o w i t h i n a b o u t 3%.

T h e s e two models p r o v i d e t h e b a s i s f o r PVFORM’s p r e d i c t i o n s r w h i c h a r e

u s u a l l y a c c u r a t e i n r a n g e s b e t w e e n 2 % a n d 5 % . F i g u r e 3 s h o w s a n

e x a m p l e of t h e a c c u r a c y of t h i s model.

26 -

20

B 0

0

.

ACTUAL

TIME OF DAY (HOURS)

F i g u r e 3 . A c t u a l a n d P r e d i c t e d dc P o w e r r Two-Axis T r a c k i n g

PVFORM w a s v e r i f i e d b y u s i n g t h e i n s o l a t i o n a n d w e a t h e r d a t a r m e a s u r e d d u r i n g t h e t e s t , a s i n p u t d a t a . The m o d u l e n o m i n a l o p e r a t i n g

c e l l t e m p e r a t u r e ( N O C T ) I a m o d u l e t e m p e r a t u r e a n d a s s o c i a t e d e f f i -

c i e n c y / a n d power d e g r a d a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t were a l s o s u p p l i e d a s i n p u t

14

Page 14: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

parameters. The e n e r g y o u t p u t c a l c u l a t e d by PVFORM was t h e n c o m p a r e d

t o t h e o u t p u t m e a s u r e d d u r i n g t h e t e s t ! a n d t h e same s t a t i s t i c a l

a n a l y s i s w a s a p p l i e d . If t h e model i s a c c u r a t e ! t h e s i m u l a t e d e n e r g y

t o t a l s w i l l be a b o u t e q u a l t o t h e m e a s u r e d t o t a l s r a n d t h e s t a t i s t i c a l

a n a l y s i s o f t h e s i m u l a t e d d a t a w i l l y i e l d t h e same r e s u l t s a s t h e

s t a t i s t i c a l a n a l y s i s a p p l i e d t o t h e m e a s u r e d d a t a . T h i s i s a p o w e r f u l

t e s t f o r a c c u r a c y b e c a u s e i t m e a s u r e s t h e d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n t h e

f u n d a m e n t a l c o n c l u s i o n s d r a w n from a n a n a l y s i s o f t h e s i m u l a t e d d a t a

v e r s u s t h e c o n c l u s i o n s d r a w n from t h e m e a s u r e d d a t a . The PVFORM m o d e l

w a s u s e d t o s i m u l a t e t h e r e s u l t s o f e a c h c o n f i g u r a t i o n c o m p a r i s o n

t e s t . The a m b i e n t w e a t h e r c o n d i t i o n s r e c o r d e d d u r i n g t h e tests were

s u p p l i e d t o t h e PVFORM model a s i n p u t parameters . The mode l w a s r u n

a n d p r o d u c e d a n es t imated power f o r e a c h t i m e p e r i o d i n w h i c h p o w e r

w a s e x p e r i m e n t a l l y m e a s u r e d . The v a l u e s were t h e n u s e d t o c o m p u t e

e n e r g y t o t a l s o v e r t h e p e r i o d 9:30 am t o 3 : O O pm. A n a l y s i s o f v a r i -

a n c e w a s a p p l i e d t o t h e da t a t o t a l s , a n d t h e r e s u l t s a r e shown ( i n p a r e n t h e s e s ) i n Table 1. A s shown i n T a b l e l r t h e d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n

t h e m e a s u r e d f u l l d a y e n e r g y t o t a l s a n d t h e s i m u l a t e d t o t a l s a r e v e r y

s m a l l r a n d t h e r a n k o r d e r i n g s o f t h e c o n f i g u r a t i o n s a r e i d e n t i c a l .

Based o n t h i s e v i d e n c e , t h e PVFORM model w a s c o n s i d e r e d t o be a p p l i c a -

b l e f o r s i m u l a t i n g t h e c o n f i g u r a t i o n c o m p a r i s o n e x p e r i m e n t i n d i f f e r -

e n t e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s .

T h e PVFORM model w a s u s e d t o perform a 1-year s i m u l a t i o n o f e a c h

of t h e f o u r PV m o d u l e c o n f i g u r a t i o n s i n t h e A l b u q u e r q u e a r ea . W e a t h e r

d a t a f o r t h e s i m u l a t i o n were t a k e n from t h e A l b u q u e r q u e T y p i c a l Mete-

o r o l o g i c a l Year ( T M Y ) data s e t . The m o d u l e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s u s e d i n

t h e model v e r i f i c a t i o n t e s t ( a u t u m n d a t a o n l y ) were a l s o a p p l i e d f o r

t h e s e r u n s . P l o t t e d r e s u l t s o f t h e s i m u l a t i o n a r e shown i n F i g u r e 4.

A s e x p e c t e d ! t h e p r e d i c t e d r a n k o r d e r i n g of t h e m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a -

t i o n s i n m i d - O c t o b e r i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e e x p e r i -

m e n t a l m e a s u r e m e n t s performed a t S N L A a t t h e same t i m e o f y e a r . T h i s

r e s u l t l e n d s f u r t h e r c r e d e n c e t o t h e v a l i d i t y of u s i n g t h e PVFORM

model a s a tool t o s i m u l a t e th .e p e r f o r m a n c e of PV m o d u l e s i n d i f f e r e n t

m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n s .

Page 15: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

I

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP o(=T NOV DEC

F i g u r e 4. PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , A l b u q u e r q u e , NM

P r e v i o u s s t u d i e s based o n i s o t r o p i c d i f f u s e i n s o l a t i o n models

h a v e shown t h a t , i n s o u t h w e s t e r n c l imates , a t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g sys tem

w i l l i n t e r c e p t a b o u t 30% more i n s o l a t i o n t h a n a f i x e d - t i l t system (1) .

I f PV p e r f o r m a n c e i s a s s u m e d t o be d i r e c t l y p r o p o r t i o n a l t o i n s o l a t i o n

a v a i l a b i l i t y , i t c a n be c o n c l u d e d t h a t e n e r g y p r o d u c t i o n f o r a t w o -

a x i s s y s t e m w i l l be 30% g r e a t e r t h a n f o r a f i x e d - t i l t s y s t e m . How-

e v e r , f i e l d o b s e r v a t i o n s by SNLA a n d o t h e r s h a v e shown t h a t t h e a c t u a l

e n e r g y i n c r e a s e i s b e t w e e n 33% a n d 41% (5 ,6) . N o e s t ima tes o f i n -

creased e n e r g y p r o d u c t i o n from o t h e r t r a c k i n g s c h e m e s h a v e b e e n d o c u -

m e n t e d . The s i m u l a t e d a n n u a l PV p e r f o r m a n c e u s i n g t h e PVFORM model

s h o w s a n i n c r e a s e o f 37% i n a v a i l a b l e i n s o l a t i o n f o r a t w o - a x i s t r a c k - i n g s c h e m e v e r s u s a f i x e d - t i l t s y s t e m , b u t o n l y a 34% i n c r e a s e i n

e n e r g y p r o d u c t i o n . The d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n 3 4 % a n d 37% is d u e t o i n c r e a s e d m o d u l e o p e r a t i n g t e m p e r a t u r e o f t h e t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g c o n -

f i g u r a t i o n i n t h e S N L A t e s t s . I n t h e s e t e s t s , a l l of t h e m o d u l e s w e r e

16

Page 16: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

m o u n t e d a t t h e same h e i g h t above t h e g r o u n d f o r b o t h t r a c k i n g and f i x e d - t i l t c o n f i g u r a t i o n s . T h u s , t h e n a t u r a l c o o l i n g e f f e c t s o f t h e

w i n d a r o u n d t h e modules i s e q u a l l y a p p l i e d r e g a r d l e s s o f how t h e

m o d u l e is m o u n t e d . T h e r e f o r e , t h e i n c r e a s e i n t e m p e r a t u r e was d u e t i n

l a r g e p a r t , t o t h e i n c r e a s e d i n s o l a t i o n o n t h e m o d u l e s u r f a c e . T h i s

may n o t be obse rved i n f i e l d e d a r r a y s t h a t a r e o f t e n m o u n t e d on r a c k s

near t h e g r o u n d a n d c a n o p e r a t e a t a h i g h e r t s m p e r a t u r e t h a n m o d u l e s m o u n t e d o n t r a c k i n g p e d e s t a l s . The s i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h i s i s t h a t t h e

PVFORM es t ima tes of i n c r e a s e d i n s o l a t i o n a v a i l a b i l i t y o n t h e f i x e d

t i l t a n d t w o - a x i s s u r f a c e s a r e a b o u t e q u a l t o f i e l d m e a s u r e d v a l u e s , a n d t h e model c a n b e u s e d t o p r o d u c e r e a s o n a b l y a c c u r a t e PV p e r f o r -

mance s i m u l a t i o n s .

PVFORM w a s a l s o u s e d t o p e r f o r m s i m u l a t i o n s f o r n i n e o t h e r s i tes

i n t h e U.S.: B o s t o n , M A ; C h a r l e s t o n , S C ; D a l l a s , TX: E l y , N V ; F r e s n o ,

C A ; H o n o l u l u , H I ; M a d i s o n , W I ; Omaha, N E ; a n d S a n t a Maria, CA. Each

s i t e r e p r e s e n t s a d i f f e r e n t c l i m a t i c r e g i o n w i t h i n t h e U.S. T a b l e 2

s h o w s t h e a n n u a l p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e f o u r c o n f i g u r a t i o n s a n d t h e i r r a n k

o r d e r a t e a c h s i t e . The " a n n u a l e n e r g y p r o d u c t i o n " i s t h e t o t a l

e n e r g y p r o d u c e d by a m o d u l e w i t h a n o v e r a l l e f f i c i e n c y o f 10 .6% a t a

c e l l t e m p e r a t u r e of 28°C a n d a n o m i n a l o p e r a t i n g c e l l t e m p e r a t u r e o f

46°C . The p e r c e n t d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e r e l a t i v e p r o d u c t i o n a r e a l s o

l i s t e d i n t h e t a b l e . F o r example, t h e i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e t a b l e i n d i -

c a t e s t h a t a t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g PV s y s t e m i n A l b u q u e r q u e w i l l p r o d u c e

a b o u t 34.4% more e n e r g y t h a n a f i x e d f l a t - p l a t e s y s t e m t i l t e d toward

t h e s o u t h a t a n a n g l e e q u a l t o t h e l a t i t u d e . T a b l e s 3 t h r o u g h 6 con-

t a i n t h e s i m u l a t e d s e a s o n a l p e r f o r m a n c e r e s u l t s f o r e a c h c o n f i g u r a t i o n

a t e a c h of t h e 10 s i t e s . The s e a s o n s o f t h e y e a r a r e r e p r e s e n t e d by

t h e f o l l o w i n g m o n t h s : w i n t e r - - D e c , J a n , F e b ; s p r i n g - - M a r , Apr, May;

summer--Juri, J u l , Aug; f a l l - - S e p r O c t , Nov. S i m u l a t e d i n s o l a t i o n

a v a i l a b i l i t i e s f o r e a c h of t h e s i t e s a r e l i s t e d i n T a b l e s 7 t h r o u g h 11. The s e a s o n a l v a l u e s o f t o t a l e n e r g y p r o d u c t i o n a n d i n s o l a t i o n

a v a i l a b i l i t y c a n be c o n v e r t e d t o a v e r a g e d a i l y v a l u e s b y d i v i d i n g t h e

t a b l e d v a l u e s b y t h e f o l l o w i n g t o t a l number o f d a y s : w i n t e r - 90,

s p r i n g - 92, summer - 92, f a l l - 91. A p p e n d i x 1 c o n t a i n s p l o t s o f t h e

m o n t h l y e n e r g y p e r f o r m a n c e f o r e a c h m o d u l e m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n i n

each o f t h e 1 0 TMY t e s t s i t e s .

1 7

Page 17: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

T a b l e 2

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d Module Mount ing Annual P e r f o r m a n c e C o m p a r i s o n s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n t h e U.S.

Site

A1 buquerque, NM

Boston, MA

Charleston, SC

Dallas, TX

Fresno, CA

Honolulu, HI

Madison, WI

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria. CA

Mount i pg Conf iu.

Two -Axis NS EW Fixed

Two - Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two- Axi s NS EW Fixed

Two- Axi s NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two- Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axi s NS EW Fixed

Energy Production % Difference (kWh/ml) NS EW Fixed

346.2 306.9 275.6 257.6

207.5 180 .8 169 .9 160.7

226.3 202.6 1 9 0 . 1 180.9

262.8 236.4 2 1 3 . 1 200.4

338.5 295.7 266.4 249.9

306 .5 276.9 242.5 2 2 7 . 1

263.9 246.7 217.7 205.2

225.9 195 .3 185.6 176.4

262.5 227.5 211.4 198 .4

287 .2 256.3 2 3 6 . 1 223.0

12.8

14.8

11 .7

11.2

14.5

10.7

6.9

15.7

15.4

1 2 . 0

25 .6 11.4

2 2 . 1 6.4

1 9 . 0 6 .6

23.3 10.9

2 7 . 1 11.0

26.4 14.2

21.2 13.4

21 .7 5.2

24.2 7.6

21 .6 8 . 6

34.4 1 9 . 2

7 .0

2 9 . 1 12.5

5.7

2 5 . 1 1 2 . 0

5 . 1

31.2 1 8 . 0

6.4

35.4 18 .3

6 . 6

35.0 21.9

6 .8

28.6 20.2

6 . 1

28 .0 10.7

5.2

32.4 14.7

6 .6

28.8 1 4 . 9

5.9

18

Page 18: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

T a b l e 3

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d Module Moun t ing S p r i n g P e r f o r m a n c e C o m p a r i s o n s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n t h e U.S.

Rank Order

1 2 3 4

Mounting Conf iq.

Two- Axis NS EW Fixed

% Difference NS EW Fixed

6.0 30.5 35.6 23.1 27.9

3.9

Energy Produc- tion (kWh/ma)

97.4

74.6 91.8

71.8

- Site

Albuquerque, NM

Boston, MA Two- Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two- Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two -Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two -Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axi s NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

58.7 54.2 46.9 45.4

8.4 25.1 29.4 15.4 19.4

3.4

Charleston, SC 66.5 63.1 54.2 52.9

5.3 22.7 25.6 16.5 19.3

2.4

Dallas, TX 68.1 64.4 54.2 52.7

5.7 25.6 29.3 18.9 22.3

2.9

Ely. NV 94.9 88.3 71.1 68.3

7.5 33.5 39.0 24.2 29.3

4.1

Fresno, CA 89.8 84.8 68.7 65.9

6.0 30.8 36.3 23.5 28.6

4.2

Honolulu, HI 68.4 66.8 55.7 54.1

2.3 22.6 26.3 19.9 23.5

3.0

Madison, WI 66.7 60.6 52.9 51.4

10.0 25.8 29.8 14.4 18.0

3.2

Omaha, NE 71.2 65.6 55.8 53.7

8.4 27.5 32.5 17.6 22.1

3.9

Santa Maria. CA Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

77.8 73.4

6.0 24.9 28.2 17.9 21.0

2.6 62.3 60.7

1 9

Page 19: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

T a b l e 4

Summary of S i m u l a t e d Module Mounting Summer Performance Comparisons a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U . S .

Site Albuquerque, NU

Boston. MA

Charleston, SC

Dallas, TX

Ely. NV

Fresno, CA

Honolulu, HI

Mad i son, W I

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria. CA

Mounting Conf ia.

TWO- AXi S NS EW F i x e d

Two-Axis NS EW F i x e d

Two-Axis NS EW F i x e d

n o - Axi s NS EW F i x e d

~ w o -Ax i s NS EW F i x e d

Two- Axi s NS EW F i x e d

Two- Axi s NS EW F i x e d

Two- Axi s NS EW F i x e d

Two -Ax i s NS EW F i x e d

Two -Axis NS EW F i x e d

Rank Order

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

Energy Produc- a Difference tion (kWh/mZ) NS EW Fixed

96.1 93.8 74.2 67.1

67.9 65.6 53.8 49.6

61.2 60.1 50.4 47.4

82.0 80.5 64.0 58.5

98.6 95.7 75.4 68.8

102.3 99.7 77.3 69.2

75.6 74.6 60.7 56.0

73.1 70.3 58.0 53.9

83.1 80.4 63.9 58.2

90.9 88.8 72.3 66.6

2 . 4 2 9 . 4 2 6 . 4

3.6 26.4 21.9

1.7 21.3 19.2

1.9 28.1 25.7

3.0 30.8 27.0

2.5 32.3 29.1

1.3 24.5 22.9

4.0 25.9 21.1

3.4 30.1 25.8

2.3 25.7 22.8

43.1 39.9 10.6

37.1 32.3 8.5

29.2 26.9 6.5

40.2 37.6 9.4

43.4 39.2 9.6

47.9 44.2 11.7

34.9 33.2 8.4

35.4 30.2 7.6

42.8 38.2 9.8

36.4 33.3 8.5

20

Page 20: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

T a b l e 5

Summary of S i m u l a t e d Module Mount ing F a l l P e r f o r m a n c e C o m p a r i s o n s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n t h e U.S.

- Site

Albuquerque, NM

Boston, MA

Charleston, SC

Dallas, TX

Ely. W

Fresno, CA

Honolulu, HI

Madison, WI

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria, CA

Mounting Conf ia.

TWO- Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two- Axi s NS EW Fixed

Two -Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two- Axi s NS EW Fixed

Two- Axi s NS EW F i x e d

Two -Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two- Axis NS EW F i x e d

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Rank order

1 2 3 4

1 3 2 4

1 3 2 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 4 2 3

1 3 2 4

1 2 3 4

Energy Produc- a Difference tion (kWh/mz) NS EW Fixed

81.8 68.7 66.1 63.6

47.0 38.0 38.9 37.8

54.7 46.1 46.6 44.8

63.3 54.1 51.8 49.8

81.7 67.1 65.0 62.7

72.7 61.0 59.5 57.6

64.3 58.6 52.9 50.9

47.9 38.5 40.4 39.2

57.6 46.3 47.4 45.7

65.8 55.2 55.2 53.2

19.1

23.7

18.6

17.0

21.8

19.2

9.7

24.6

24.5

19.4

23.7 3.9

20.7 2.5

17.5 0.9

22.3 4.5

25.7 3.2

22.3 2.6

21.5 10.8

18.9 4.8

21.6 2.4

19.4 0.0

28.7 8.0 4.0

24.3 0.4 2.9

22.2 3.0 4.0

27.1 8.6 3.9

30.5 7.1 3.8

26.3 5.9 3.2

26.3 15.2 4.0

22.3 1.9 2.9

26.1 1.3 3.6

23.8 3.7 3.7

Page 21: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

Tab le 6

Summary of S i m u l a t e d Module Mount ing W i n t e r P e r f o r m a n c e C o m p a r i s o n s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n the U . S .

Site Albuquerque, NM

Boston, MA

Charleston, SC

Dallas, TX

Ely. NV

Fresno, CA

Honolulu, HI

Madison, WI

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria, CA

Mounting Conf ig . Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two -Axis NS EW Fixed

Two- Axi s NS EW Fixed

Two -Axis NS EW Fixed

Two -Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two -Ax i s NS EW Fixed

Two-Axis NS EW Fixed

Two-Axi s NS EW Fixed

Two-Axi 6 NS EW Fixed

Rank Order

1 4 2 3

1 4 2 3

1 4

3

1 4 2 3

1 4 2 3

1 4 2 3

1 3 2 4

1 4 2 3

1 4 2 3

1 4 2 3

2 ,

Energy Produc- % Difference t ion ( kWh/m2 1 NS EW Fixed

70.9 52.6 60.6 55.1

33.8 23.0 30.2 27.9

43.9 33.2 38.9 35.8

49.4 37.5 43.2 39.5

63.3 44.6 54.9 50.3

41.6 31.3 37.0 34.3

55.6 46.7 48.3 44.2

38.2 25.9 34.3 31.8

50.6 35.1 44.3 40.7

52.6 38.9 46.3 42.5

34.9

46.9

32.2

32.1

41.9

32.9

19.2

47.3

44.0

35.2

17.0 15.3

11.9 31.2

12.8 17.2

14.5 15.3

15.3 23.1

12.5 18.2

15.1 3.5

11.4 32.3

14.3 26.0

13.5 19.1

28.6 4.9 9.9

21.3 21.1 8.3

22.6 7.8 8.7

25.4 5.3 9.5

25.8 12.8 9.1

21.3 9.6 7.8

25.9 5.7 9.4

19.8 23.0 7.6

24 ..3 15.9 8.8

23.8 9.2 9.1

22

Page 22: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

T a b l e 7

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d Module M o u n t i n g C o m p a r i s o n s A n n u a l I n s o l a t i o n A v a i l a b i l i t i e s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n t h e

A n n u a l (kWh/rn2)

SITE

Albuquerque, NM

Boston, MA

Charleston, SC

Dallas, TX

Ely. NV

Fresno. CA

Honolulu, HI

Madison, WI

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria, CA

TOT. HOR

2 1 1 2 . 7

1 2 6 2 . 0

1 5 4 1 . 0

1 7 0 4 . 9

1 9 1 5 . 8

1 9 8 3 . 5

1 8 8 7 . 9

1 3 6 5 . 0

1 5 3 5 . 7

1 8 3 3 . 9

- 2A

3 4 5 7 . 2

1 9 3 9 . 9

2 2 1 0 . 6

2 5 9 1 . 5

3 2 6 0 . 7

3 1 3 9 . 1

2 6 0 2 . 5

2 1 2 3 . 1

2 5 1 2 . 2

2 7 9 2 . 8

NS

3 0 3 1 . 3

1 6 8 6 . 4

1 9 6 7 . 2

2 3 1 9 . 5

2 8 1 9 . 3

2 8 1 0 . 9

2 4 2 3 . 6

1 8 2 8 . 0

2 1 6 9 . 1

2 4 6 6 . 6

EW - 2 7 1 5 . 3

1 5 7 5 . 5

1 8 4 2 . 7

2 0 7 9 . 9

2 5 3 2 . 9

2 4 4 4 . 1

2 1 3 2 . 4

1 7 2 7 . 6

1 9 9 7 . 9

2 2 7 4 . 7

TILT

2 5 3 1 . 2

1 4 8 8 . 8

1 7 4 9 . 8

1 9 5 1 . 7

2 3 7 2 . 1

2 2 8 3 . 9

2 0 0 6 . 4

1 6 3 9 . 2

1 8 7 1 . 9

2 1 4 3 . 1

u. s.

DNI

2 6 0 9 . 7

1 1 6 5 . 9

1 3 5 5 . 7

1 7 5 5 . 4

2 4 1 3 . 5

2 2 5 7 . 8

1 2 7 4 . 4

1 3 1 1 . 8

1 6 7 4 . 3

1 9 5 8 . 8

T a b l e 8

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d A v a i l a b l e I n s o l a t i o n f o r D i f f e r e n t F l a t - P l a t e T r a c k i n g C o n f i g u r a t i o n s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n t h e

SITE

Albuquerque, NM

Boston, MA

Charleston, SC

Dallas, tX

Ely, NV

Fresno, CA

Honolulu, HI

Mad i s on, W I

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria, CA

TOT. HOR

6 3 5 . 0

3 7 5 . 8

4 7 6 . 5

4 6 8 . 1

5 5 9 . 4

5 9 5 . 5

5 2 4 . 1

4 1 0 . 6

4 5 5 . 7

5 2 8 . 4

S p r i n g

2A

9 5 9 . 8

5 4 0 . 9

6 4 5 . 5

6 5 8 . 6

8 9 8 . 9

9 0 5 . 5

6 7 2 . 7

6 1 6 . 2

6 7 8 . 5

7 5 0 . 4

-

( kWh/m2)

NS

8 9 9 . 8

4 9 7 . 2

6 1 0 . 6

6 2 1 . 1

8 3 0 . 3

8 4 8 . 1

6 5 6 . 5

5 5 7 . 1

6 2 3 . 1

7 0 4 . 2

- - EW

7 2 5 . 6

4 2 9 . 5

522 .3

5 1 9 . 4

6 6 4 . 8

6 8 2 . 3

5 4 4 . 6

4 8 5 . 6

5 2 5 . 9

5 9 3 . 9

TIT,T

6 9 7 . 5

4 1 4 . 9

5 0 9 . 7

5 0 4 . 2

6 3 8 . 1

6 5 4 . 7

5 2 8 . 3

4 7 0 . 3

5 0 5 . 6

5 7 8 . 3

U . S .

- DN I

7 0 3 . 5

3 0 5 . 6

375 .3

423 .4

6 2 5 . 7

6 3 1 . 0

3 0 6 . 6

3 7 0 . 5

4 3 5 . 9

498 .4

Page 23: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

Table 9

Summary o f Simulated Ava i lab le I n s o l a t i o n f o r D i f f e r e n t F l a t - P l a t e Tracking Conf igurat ions a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U.S.

Summer (kWh/m2)

SITE

Albuquerque, NM

Boston, MA

Charleston. gC Dalld6. TX

Ely. NV

Fresno, CA

Honolulu, HI

Madison, WI

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria, CA

TOT. HOR

717.11

498.4

496.1

620.9

700.3

757.3

578.8

537.1

585.9

665.6

29 1001. a

663.7

616.3

843.5

987.8

1094.1

745.7

724.1

835.5

887.4

M 975.7

638.9

604.8

826.1

955.8

1062.9

735.9

693.7

805.6

865.5

- EW

764.1

521.0

503.5

651.3

744.5

812.3

595.1

568.9

634.6

698.0

TILT 690.2

479.9

471.8

594.4

678.6

726.4

548.3

528.4

577.5

642.3

DNI 741.5

400.4

355.7

563.8

742.3

834.0

301.4

451.6

543.9

648.7

T a b l e 1 0

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d A v a i l a b l e I n s o l a t i o n f o r D i f f e r e n t F l a t - P l a t e T r a c k i n g C o n f i g u r a t i o n s a t 10 S i t e s i n t h e U.S.

F a l l ( kWh/m2 )

-- SITE

Albuquerque, NM

Boston, MA

Charleston, SC

Dallas, TX

Ely, NV

Fresno, CA

Honolulu, HI

Madison, WI

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria, CA

TOT. HOR

455.0

249.1

339.6

380.5

408.7

423.6

442.2

263.4

300.4

387.1

2A - 824.5

440.4

535.8

626.9

798.6

744.7

638.7

451.9

551.2

645.1

NS

675.6

352.4

446.4

529.2

640.6

611.1

578.9

357.9

437.0

531.3

- EW - 657.5

362.6

452.7

507.9

628.4

601.1

521.9

377.2

448.6

536.2

TILT

630.4

352.2

434.8

488.2

604.3

581.3

501.3

366.6

432.6

515.9

DN I

641.4

275.5

343.1

455.2

616.4

558.4

334.7

289.2

390.0

454.8

-

2 4

Page 24: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

Table 11

Summary o f S i m u l a t e d A v a i l a b l e I n s o l a t i o n f o r D i f f e r e n t F l a t - P l a t e T r a c k i n g C o n f i g u r a t i o n s a t 1 0 S i t e s i n t h e U.S.

W i n t e r ( kWh/m2 )

SITE TOT. HOR - 2A NS EW TILT DNI Albuquerque, N?4 305.6 670.9 480.0 568.2 513.1 523.1

B o s t o n , MA 138.7 294.8 197.9 262.5 241.8 184.4

C h a r l e s t o n , SC

D a l l a s , TX

E l y , NV

F r e s n o , CA

Honolu lu , H I

Madison, WI

Omaha, NE

Santa Maria , CA

228.8

235.3

247.5

207.2

342.8

153.9

193.6

252.8

413.1 305.5 364.2

462.5 343.1 401.3

572.3 392.6 495.2

394.7 288.7 348.4

545.3 452.3 470.7

330.9 219.2 295.9

447.0 303.3 388.8

510.1 365.6 446.5

333.4

364.8

451.1

321.5

428.6

273.9

356.1

406.6

281.4

313.1

429.2

234.4

331.8

200.4

304.5

356.8

C O N C L U S I O N S

The s t u d y s u p p o r t s t h e f o l l o w i n g c o n c l u s i o n s :

1, T h e r e a r e s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n t h e

p e r f o r m a n c e s o f i d e n t i c a l PV m o d u l e s m o u n t e d i n e a c h of t h e

f o u r c o n f i g u r a t i o n s t e s t e d a t S N L A . A r a n k o r d e r i n g o f t h e

m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n s r based o n t h e d i f f e r e n c e s , c a n be

made f o r t h e A l b u q u e r q u e a rea f o r t h e p e r i o d o f m i d - O c t o b e r . I n t h i s p a r t o f t h e y e a r , t h e t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m p r o -

d u c e s t h e g r e a t e s t t o t a l a m o u n t o f d a i l y e n e r g y , a n d t h e

f i x e d t i l t p r o d u c e s t h e l e a s t . T h i s i s a n e x p e c t e d t r e n d i n

October , b u t does n o t r e p r e s e n t t h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e y e a r .

T h e p r i m a r y u s e o f t h e m e a s u r e d t e s t r e s u l t s w a s t o v e r i f y

t h e a c c u r a c y o f t h e PVFORM c o m p u t e r m o d e l . The model w a s

shown t o r e p r o d u c e p r e c i s e l y t h e S N L A c o n f i g u r a t i o n c o m p a r i -

s o n t e s t r e s u l t s . F u r t h e r ! t h e m o d e l h a s p r o d u c e d m e a s u r e s

o f PV m o d u l e p e r f o r m a n c e f o r d i f f e r e n t c o n f i g u r a t i o n s t h a t

2 5

Page 25: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

2.

are r e a s o n a b l y c o n s i s t e n t w i t h l i m i t e d m e a s u r e d d a t a . T h e r e - f o r e r i t i s c o n c l u d e d t h a t t h e PVFORM model i s a n a p p r o p r i a t e

t o o l f o r s i m u l a t i n g t h e a n n u a l p e r f o r m a n c e o f a m o d u l e

m o u n t e d i n t h e f o u r c o n f i g u r a t i o n s .

The r e l a t i v e p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e f o u r m o d u l e m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u -

r a t i o n s v a r i e s t h r o u g h o u t t h e y e a r , a n d t h i s v a r i a n c e i s masked i n t h e c o m p u t a t i o n of a n a n n u a l p e r f o r m a n c e v a l u e . I n

A l b u q u e r q u e d u r i n g J u n e , f o r e x a m p l e , t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e

n o r t h - s o u t h a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m is a b o u t t h e same a s a

t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m . I n J a n u a r y , h o w e v e r , a n o r t h - s o u t h

a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m p r o d u c e s t h e l e a s t e n e r g y among t h e f o u r

c o n f i g u r a t i o n s . The r e l a t i v e l y p o o r p e r f o r m a n c e of t h e

n o r t h - s o u t h a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m i n t h e l o w - i n s o l a t i o n m o n t h s

i s s u f f i c i e n t l y o f f s e t b y g o o d p e r f o r m a n c e d u r i n g t h e h i g h -

i n s o l a t i o n m o n t h s s o t h a t i t s a n n u a l p e r f o r m a n c e is s e c o n d

o n l y t o a t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m . T h e r e f o r e , i f t h e l o a d demand on a P V s y s t e m is s e a s o n a l , a n a n a l y s i s o f t h e r e l a -

t i v e p e r f o r m a n c e o f e a c h m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n i n t h a t

s p e c i f i c s e a s o n may be n e c e s s a r y t o e n s u r e t h a t t h e o p t i m a l

system i s d e s i g n e d .

3 . I n t h e 10 l o c a t i o n s s t u d i e d , t h e r e l a t i v e r a n k i n g of t h e

a n n u a l p e r f o r m a n c e of t h e d i f f e r e n t m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a t i o n s

d i d n o t c h a n g e . T h a t i s , o n a n a n n u a l b a s i s , t w o - a x i s t r a c k - i n g p r o d u c e d t h e most e n e r g y ! a n d f i x e d t i l t p r o d u c e d t h e

l e a s t . However r t h e c l e a r - s k y c o n d i t i o n s , w h i c h a r e p r e v a -

l e n t i n a r i d a n d s e m i a r i d r e g i o n s , h a v e t w o i m p o r t a n t e f f e c t s

o n m o d u l e p e r f o r m a n c e . F i r s t , a l l m o d u l e m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a -

t i o n s perform r e l a t i v e l y w e l l i n t h e s e d r y a r eas . F o r

e x a m p l e , a f i x e d - t i l t s y s t e m o p e r a t i n g i n A l b u q u e r q u e , NM, p r o d u c e s a b o u t a s much e n e r g y a s a t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m

o p e r a t i n g i n M a d i s o n r W I . S e c o n d , t h e d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n

t h e r e l a t i v e p e r f o r m a n c e of t h e v a r i o u s m o u n t i n g c o n f i g u r a -

t i o n s i s l a r g e s t i n a r i d o r s e m i a r i d l o c a t i o n s . For e x a m p l e ,

a t w o - a x i s s y s t e m i n A l b u q u e r q u e r N M ; E l y , N V ; o r F r e s n o , C A

w i l l p r o d u c e a b o u t 35% more e n e r g y t h a n f i x e d - t i l t systems.

2 6

Page 26: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

The p e r c e n t a g e i n c r e a s e f o r t h e same s y s t e m s a t t h e o t h e r

s i t e s i n t h i s s t u d y a v e r a g e d a b o u t 2 7 % .

4. I n c o m p a r i n g t h e a n n u a l p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e t w o - a x i s t r a c k i n g

s y s t e m w i t h t h e n o r t h - s o u t h a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m , i t w a s

f o u n d t h a t t h e a d v a n t a g e of t h e t w o - a x i s s y s t e m r a n g e d

b e t w e e n 6% a n d 15%. T h e r e f o r e , d e p e n d i n g o n t h e c o s t o f

t r a c k i n g d e v i c e s , t h e r e may be o c c a s i o n s w h e r e t h e s i n g l e -

a x i s s y s t e m may be t h e most c o s t - e f f e c t i v e o p t i o n . T h i s i s

e s p e c i a l l y t r u e i n l o w - l a t i t u d e l o c a t i o n s l i k e H o n o l u l u , H I .

I n t h e s e a r e a s , t h e s u n a l t i t u d e a n g l e s a r e l a r g e a l l y e a r .

T h i s t e n d s t o i n c r e a s e t h e r e l a t i v e p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e h o r i -

z o n t a l s i n g l e - a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m s .

5. The a d v a n t a g e s o f t h e EW a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m o v e r a f i x e d -

t i l t o r i e n t a t i o n r a n g e d b e t w e e n 5% a n d 8%. I n most a p p l i c a -

t i o n s , t h e small p o t e n t i a l i n c r e a s e i n e n e r g y p r o d u c t i o n from

a n east-west a x i s t r a c k i n g s y s t e m w i l l n o t p a y f o r t h e

i n c r e a s e d c o s t s o f t h e t r a c k i n g m e c h a n i s m . I f a t r a c k i n g

s y s t e m i s b e i n g s t u d i e d a s a n a l t e r n a t i v e t o o n e i n a f i x e d -

t i l t c o n f i g u r a t i o n , t h e t w o - a x i s o r n o r t h - s o u t h a x i s c o n f i g u -

r a t i o n s s h o u l d be t h e o n l y c o n s i d e r a t i o n s .

6. The e n e r g y p r e d i c t i o n s a n d s u b s e q u e n t c o m p a r i s o n s p r e s e n t e d

i n t h i s paper a r e based o n a new a n d more a c c u r a t e s o l a r

r a d i a t i o n model t h a t i s n o t i n g e n e r a l u s e t o d a y . T h e s e

e n e r g y p e r f o r m a n c e e s t ima tes a r e n o t r e p r o d u c i b l e when t h e

a n a l y s i s i s based o n t h e more common r a d i a t i o n m o d e l s . S i n c e

a v a i l a b l e t a b l e s o f s o l a r r a d i a t i o n a v a i l a b i l i t y a n d m o d u l e

e n e r g y p e r f o r m a n c e a r e b a s e d o n t h e s e o l d e r m o d e l s , t h e

r e s u l t s p r e s e n t e d h e r e c a n n o t be a c c u r a t e l y r a t i o e d o r cor- r e l a t e d t o e x i s t i n g t a b u l a t e d d a t a . The o n l y n o t i c e a b l e

t r e n d i s t h a t t h e new e s t i m a t e s o f e n e r g y p e r f o r m a n c e a n d

i n s o l a t i o n a v a i l a b i l i t i e s a r e g e n e r a l l y 7% t o 18% h i g h e r t h a n

e x i s t i n g p u b l i s h e d v a l u e s a n d a r e r e a s o n a b l y c o n s i s t e n t w i t h

t h e m e a s u r e d d a t a t h a t a r e a v a i l a b l e . S N L A i s i n t h e p r o c e s s

of u s i n g PVFORM t o g e n e r a t e new e s t ima tes o f s o l a r a v a i l a -

b i l i t i e s a n d t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g e n e r g y p e r f o r m a n c e o f m o d u l e s

Page 27: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

mounted i n va r ious t r ack ing and f ixed o r i e n t a t i o n s f o r many l o c a t i o n s i n t he Typical Meteorological Year network.

7 . T h i s s tudy concent ra ted on the comparison of the four most popular t r ack ing conf igu ra t ions . Howeverr t h e r e a r e two o t h e r t r ack ing schemes t h a t should be considered whenever t r ack ing is a module mounting opt ion . These inc lude ( a ) a module mounted to r o t a t e about a v e r t i c a l a x i s w i t h the s u r f a c e t i l t e d upward equal t o t h e l a t i t u d e and ( b ) a module mounted t o r o t a t e about a s i n g l e a x i s w i t h t h e a x i s p a r a l l e l t o t h e po la r a x i s . SNLA is i n t h e p rocess of t e s t i n g t h e s e two c o n f i g u r a t i o n s so t h a t t h e i r t o t a l energy product ion can be s imulated and compared w i t h t h e fou r c o n f i g u r a t i o n s descr ibed i n t h i s paper.

28

Page 28: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

REF ERE NC ES

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

J o n e s . G. J. I E n e r q y P r o d u c t i o n T r a d e - o f f s i n P h o t o v o l t a i c S y s t e m D e s i q n , SAND82-2239, (Sandia N a t i o n a l L a b o r a t o r i e s , A l b u q u e r q u e I N M I 1983) .

M e n i c u c c i , D. F. I PVFORM, A P h o t o v o l t a i c S y s t e m A n a l y s i s P r o g r a m : Users M a n u a l , SAND85-0376, ( S a n d i a N a t i o n a l Labora to r i e s , A l b u q u e r q u e I N M r 1985) .

P e r e z , R., An A n i s o t r o p i c Model of D i f f u s e S o l a r R a d i a t i o n W i t h A p p l i c a t i o n s t o a n O p t i m i z a t i o n of Compound P a r a b o l i c C o n c e n t r a - - t o r s , USDOE, #DEFG0577ET20182, A t m o s p h e r i c S c i e n c e s R e s e a r c h C e n t e r , S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y of New York a t A l b a n y r 1 9 8 4 .

F u e n t e s , M. K . , A S i m p l i f i e d T h e r m a l Model of P h o t o v o l t a i c M o d u l e s , S A N D 8 5 - 0 3 3 0 , ( S a n d i a N a t i o n a l L a b o r a t o r i e s r A l b u q u e r q u e I N M , 1 9 8 5 ) .

H u l s t r o m , R. L. I B r a n c h C h i e f I R e n e w a b l e R e s o u r c e A s s e s s m e n t a n d I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n r S o l a r E l e c t r i c R e s e a r c h D i v i s i o n , S o l a r E n e r g y R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e : P e r s o n a l c o m m u n i c a t i o n s .

S h u s h n a r , G. J . # e t a l l " B a l a n c e of S y s t e m Cos ts €o r a 5 M W P h o t o - v o l t a i c G e n e r a t i n g S y s t e m , ' ' A R C 0 S o l a r , I n c l p r e s e n t e d a t t h e IEEE/PES 1985 W i n t e r M e e t i n q , New York , N e w Y o r k r F e b 3-8, 1985.

Page 29: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

APPEN D I X

P l o t s of M o n t h l y E n e r g y P e r f o r m a n c e

3 1 , 3 2

Page 30: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

LEGEND 0 FD(EDllLT

0 TWO-AXISTkACKlNG

--A. 0 -. .&gm..sm&&.- -W

/. 72-.:,.\ ......

..............................................................................

5 JAN fXB MAR APR MAY x#r( .NJL AUG SEP Ocrr NOV DEC

F i g u r e A l . PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , A l b u q u e r q u e , NM

-1 LEGEND FIXEDTILT

........................................ 0 EAST-WEST AXIS A NORTH-SOUTH AXIS - 0 TWO-AXIS - - - - TRACKING - - -

JAN FEB MAR AFT? MAY JUN JUL AUG S P OCT NOV DEC

F i g u r e A2. PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , B o s t o n , MA

Page 31: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

F i g u r e A 3 . PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , C h a r l e s t o n , S C

LEGEND

I

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

F i g u r e A 4 . PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , D a l l a s - F t . W o r t h , TX

3 4

Page 32: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

F i g u r e A 5 . PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , E l y , N V

LEGEND 45

5 JAN FEE MAR APR MAY XIN JJL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

F i g u r e A6. PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , F r e s n o , C A

3 5

Page 33: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

45. LEGEND

I.. * ...... Nom=s6m'xxTs'. AXIS ........................................... 0 W&@$ WAtKIN$ - - ---

al' 5 ~ - JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

....

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY XIN Juc AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Figure A 8 . PVFORM Energy Predictionsr Madisonr WI

3 6

Page 34: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

~~~

LEGEND 0 FIXEDTILT - -----.---.-- 0 EAgmxs A.! ..... A Nom-SOm AXIS-

-------- 0 TWO-AXIS TRACKING ...,...,........ .......... .. ............... .. ..... ............. )..... .. ...

Y W

: €s'. " 'A x lo:

- - JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

F i g u r e A 9 . PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s ! Omaha, NE

- JAN FFB MAR APR MAY XM XIL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

F i g u r e A 1 0 . PVFORM E n e r g y P r e d i c t i o n s , S a n t a Maria, C A

37

Page 35: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

DISTRIBUTION:

ABLE CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY 1 Park Plaza 3250 Wilsh i re B l v d . , S u i t e 808 L o s A n g e l e s , CA 9 0 0 1 0 A t t n : D r . John L i m

ACUREX ( 3 ) 485 C l y d e A v e . M t . V i e w , CA 94042 A t t n : D a n R o s e n

B o b Spencer Mi tche l l Wool

THE AEROSPACE CORP. ( 2 ) P.O. B o x 92957

L o s Angeles, CA 90009 A t t n : E d w a r d Simburger

M S M3-386

S tan ley L . L e o n a r d

A I A FOUNDATION 1 7 3 5 New York A v e n u e NW Washington, DC 20006 A t t n : G e o r g e R o y a l

ALABAMA SOLAR ENERGY CTR. Un ive r s i ty of A l a b a m a a t

H u n t s v i l l e , AL 35899 A t t n : Don Wallace

H u n t s v i l l e

ALL STAR ELECTRIC CO. 1 1 7 0 8 C a n d e l a r i a NE U n i t A A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 8 7 1 1 2 A t t n : Michael L a V i n e

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS ( A E S I ) ( 3 ) 20442 Sun V a l l e y D r . L a g u n a B e a c h , CA 9 2 6 5 1 A t t n : R i c h a r d B. A s h b y

A l l a n Mayfield W i l l i a m T o d o r o f

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS ( A E S I ) 1 1 4 3 2 Pena Way Mira L o m a , CA 9 1 7 5 2 A t t n : R i c k A. G r o s

AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION 89 C a m b r i d g e S t r e e t B u r l i n g t o n , MA 0 1 8 0 3 A t t n : E r v i n Lyon

AMP, INCORPORATED 230 C o m m e r c e D r i v e Largo, FL 33540 A t t n : Marvin H. Jones

APPLIED SOLAR ENERGY CORP. 1 5 2 5 1 E. D o n J u l i a n R d . C i t y of Indus t ry , CA 9 1 7 4 6 A t t n : K. L i n g

ARC0 SOLAR INC. ( 7 ) P. 0. B o x 4400 Woodland H i l l s , CA 9 1 3 6 5 A t t n : Je f f R o s e n

James A r n e t t B i l l Yerkes G a r y Shushnar D. G h o s h Wes J o s h i E r n e s t Prokopovych

ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ( 2 ) 4 1 1 N o r t h C e n t r a l A v e . Phoenix, AZ 85036 A t t n : Tom L e p l e y

P e t e E c k e r t

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY ( 2 ) C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g T e m p e , AZ 8 5 2 8 1 A t t n : P a u l R u s s e l l

ASSOCIATED S P E C I A L I S T S 904 K e n t e r Way Los A n g e l e s , CA 90049 A t t n : B y r o n L. Fry

AUBURN UNIVERSITY 207 D u n s t a n H a l l E l e c t r i c a l E n g r . D e p t . A u b u r n , AL 36849 A t t n : A l i I m e c e

RAY BAHM & ASSOCIATES 2 5 1 3 K i m b e r l y C o u r t NW A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 8 7 1 2 0 A t t n : R a y Bahm

BATTELLE COLUMBUS LABS ( 3 ) 505 K i n g A v e n u e C o l u m b u s , OH 44320 A t t n : Don C a r m i c h a e l

G e r r y N o e l G r a h a m A l e x a n d e r

38

Page 36: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

BATTELLE-PACIFIC S i g m a I V B u i l d i n g R i c h l a n d , WA 99352 A t t n : Ray Watts

BDM CORPORATION ( 3 ) 1 8 0 1 R a n d o l p h R o a d S E A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 87 1 0 6 A t t n : Wayne K a u f f m a n

Don For re s t e r T i m L a m b a r s k i

BECHTEL NATIONAL INC. (2) P. 0. B o x 3965 San Francisco, CA 9 4 1 1 9 A t t n : Walter S t o l t e

A n d y F r a n k l i n

BOSS, INC. 7745 E a s t R e d f i e l d R o a d Scot t sda le , A 2 85260 A t t n : B r a d O ' M a r a

C. T. SAH ASSOCIATES 403 Pond R i d g e L a n e Urbana, I L 6 1 8 0 1 A t t n : C. T. Sah

CALIFORNIA I N S T I T U T E OF TECHNOLOGY E n g l g & A p p l . Sci . , 209 K e c k 1 2 4 1 N. H o l l i s t o n A v e . Pasadena, CA 9 1 1 0 4 A t t n : R i c h a r d C. Flagan

CARBONE INVESTMENT MGMT. CORP. 570 D w i g h t Place B e r k e l e y , CA 94704 A t t n : R o b e r t C a r b o n e

CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIV. 1 1 5 Scaife H a l l P i t t s b u r g h , PA 1 5 2 1 3 A t t n : R o b e r t F. Sekerka

CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY D e p a r t m e n t of M a c r o m o l e c u l a r Science C l e v e l a n d , OH 4 4 1 0 6 A t t n : Jack L. K o e n i g

CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY 576 Standard A v e . R i c h m o n d , CA 94802 A t t n : R. C r e e k

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY E l e c t r i c a l E n g i n e e r i n g Department C l e m s o n , SC 2 9 6 3 1 A t t n : Jay L a t h r o p

CORNELL UNIVERSITY Material Sciences & E n g i n e e r i n g B a r d H a l l I t haca , NY 1 4 8 5 3 A t t n : Die te r E. A s t

DOE/ALO ( 5 ) A l b u q u e r q u e O p s . O f . P. 0. Box 5400 A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 8 7 1 1 5 A t t n : D. K r e n z

D. Graves G. T e n n y s o n G. Pappas B. M c C a r t y

DOE/HQ ( 6 ) For res ta l B u i l d i n g 1 0 0 Independence A v e n u e S W Washington, DC 20585 A t t n : A n d r e w K r a n t z

Mort Pr ince A n t h o n y Scolaro S a m T a y l o r V i n c e R i c e R. H. A n n a n

EG&G K i r t l a n d O p e r a t i o n s A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 87 1 8 5 A t t n : B. B o y s o n

, *

E. I. DU PONT COMPANY C h e s t n u t R u n , F&FD D e p t . Wilmington, DE 1 9 8 9 8 A t t n : J. D. C. Wilson

E. I. DU PONT COMPANY F i n i s h e s & Fabricated D e p t . G a r r e t t M i l l B l d g . B a r l e y M i l l P laza Wilmington , DE 1 9898 A t t n : E . M. K l e p p e r

ELECTRINK, INC. 7554 T r a d e S t . San D i e g o , CA 9 2 1 2 1 A t t n : Joseph Parker

Page 37: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

ENERGY ANALYSIS, INC. 1 2 1 6 0 C l a r e t t a Street Sylmar, CA 9 1 3 4 2 A t t n : Fred B a r t e l s

ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICE 1 6 7 5 West Maple S t r e e t T r o y , M I 48084 A t t n : R i c h a r d B l i e d e n

ENERGY DAILY 8 1 5 15th S t r e e t NW S u i t e 400 Washington , DC 20005 A t t n : L l e w e l l y n K i n g

ENERGY ENGINEERING, INC. 4 6 1 6 M c L e o d R o a d NE A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 8 7 1 0 9 A t t n : T h o m a s Feldman

ENERGY MATERIALS CORPORATION ( 2 ) P.O. B o x 1 1 4 3 S t e r l i n g R o a d South Lancaster , MA 0 1 5 6 1 A t t n : Herbert E. B a t e s

W i l l i a m J. L i t t l e

ENTECH, INC. P . 0. B o x 6 1 2 2 4 6 DFW A i r p o r t , TX 7 5 2 6 1 A t t n : Mark O ' N e i l l

ENTROPICS P.O. B o x 4 5 2 8 9 1 L o s A n g e l e s , CA 90042 A t t n : Seid M. A r d e k a n i

E P R I ( 2 ) P. 0. B o x 1 0 4 1 2 Pa lo A l t o , CA 94303 A t t n : R o g e r T a y l o r

E d DeMao

FLORIDA SOLAR ENERGY CENTER ( 2 ) 300 S t a t e R o a d 4 0 1 C a p e C a n a v e r a l , F L 32920 A t t n : Henry Healey

G e r a r d V e n t r e

GENERAL ELECTRIC B u i l d i n g 37 Room 478 Schenectady, NY 1 2 3 4 5 A t t n : R o b e r t G u e s s

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY 333 Piedmont A v e n u e A t l a n t a , GA 30303 A t t n : G a r y B i r d w e l l

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY P. 0. Box 4545 Shenandoah, GA 30302 A t t n : E d w a r d J. N e y

GEORGIA TECH EES ( 3 ) 211 O ' K e e f e A t l a n t a , GA 30332 A t t n : L a r r y B a n t a

G e o r g e C o k k i n i d e s S id Firs tman

GILA RIVER PRODUCTS C h a n d l e r , A2 85224 A t t n : W i l l i a m R. B e l l

HEERY ENERGY CONSULTANTS 880 West Peachtree S t ree t A t l a n t a , GA 30367 A t t n : G l e n n Jardine

HELIONETICS 1 7 3 1 2 E a s t m a n S t ree t I r v i n e , CA 9 2 7 1 4 A t t n : Larry Suelz le

HEMLOCK SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY ( 2 ) 1 2 3 3 4 G e d d e s R o a d H e m l o c k , M I 48628 A t t n : A r v i d A r v i d s o n

J a m e s R. M c C o r m i c k

HUGHES AIRCRAFT P. 0. B o x 9399 B u i l d i n g A1 M / S 40843 Long B e a c h , CA 9 0 8 1 0 A t t n : G e o r g e N a f f

I E E 345 E . 47th Stree t New York, NY 1 0 0 1 7 A t t n : R o b e r t K l e i n

INTERSOL POWER CORPORATION ( 2 ) 1 1 9 0 1 W. C e d a r A v e . L a k e w o o d , CO 80228 A t t n : John Sanders

D i c k S t e g e m a n

4 0

Page 38: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

J . C . SCHUMACHER ( 2 ) 580 Airport Road Oceanride, CA 92054 Attn : Stephen M. Lord

Joeeph C. Schumacher

J E T PROPULSION LABORATORY ( 8 ) 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, CA 91109 A t t n : Bud Powell

Gerald Praver Russ Sugimura Anthony Pearson Kent Volkmer Len Re i t e r W. T. Callaghan Ron Ross

KELLAM, BIRD, JOHNSON, INC. 612 North Park S t r e e t Columbus, OH 43215 Attn: John Ayres

KYOCERA (3) 8611 Balboa Avenue San Diego, CA 92123-1580 Attn: W i l l i a m E v e r i t t

R. Alan Panton Luis Alvarez

LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATER & POWER ( 2 ) 1 1 1 North Hope S t r e e t Los Angeles, CA 90051 Attn: W i l l i a m W. Engels

Kevin G. McAvoy

MARTIN MARIETTA (3) P. 0. Box 179 Denver, CO 80201 At tn : H. Wroton

Bob Hein Matt Imamura

MC DONNELL DOUGLAS ASTRONAUTICS CO. 5301 Bolsa Avenue, M/S 431, 10-3 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 At tn : Lloyd E. Sanchez

MERIDAN CORP. ( 2 ) 5113 Leesburg Pike S u i t e 700 F a l l s Church, VA 22041 Attn: Brad M a C l e e r

Judy Hogan

METAL IRON CO.

F t . Worth, TX 76106 Attn : Arthur Varnoor

P, 0. BOX 4590

MIT/ENERGY LAB-NE RES ( 3 ) 711 Virgin ia Road Concord, MA 01742 A t t n : Miles Ruesel l

Ed Kern Daniel Bergman

MOBIL SOLAR ENERGY CORP. ( 4 ) 16 Hickory Drive Waltham, MA 02254 A t t n : Bob L. Hammond

Cather ine M. Joyce J u r i s P. Kalejs F r i t z V. Wald

MONO SOLAR , 8635 Aviat ion Blvd. Inglewood, CA 90301 At tn : Bulent M. Basol

I NC .

MONSANTO ELECTRONIC MATERIALS

P.O. Box 8 Hwy 79 North S t . P e t e r s , MO 63376 Attn: Harold R. Pa t ton

COMPANY ( 2 )

Robert M. Sandfort

NASA HEADQUARTERS - Code R J E 600 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20546 Attn: Don H. Calahan

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL ( 2 ) Montreal Road Ottawa, ONTARIO, Canada K I A OR6 Attn: S i e g f r i e d Karius

Glen Rumbold

NMSEI ( 2 ) P. 0. Box 3SOL L a s Cruces, NM 88003 Attn: Vern R i s se r

Harry Zwibel

NMS I D C 5301 Cen t ra l NE S u i t e 705 Albuquerque , NM 871 08 Attn: Leland Alhorn

Page 39: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LAB ( 2 ) P. 0. B o x X O a k R i d g e , TN 37830 A t t n : John S t o v a l l

Stephen I. K a p l a n

ONTARIO MINISTRY OF ENERGY 56 Wellesley Street West T o r o n t o , C a n a d a M7A 237 A t t n : I a n L e w i s

ONTARIO RESEARCH FOUNDATION E n g i n e e r i n g Sciences D i v i s ion Sheridan Park R e s . C o m m u n i t y Mississauga, O n t a r i o , C a n a d a L5K 1 B 3 A t t n : Michael Westcott

OSTRACO PHOTOVOLTAIC CO . ( 2 ) P h i l l i p D r i v e Pr ince ton , N J 08540 A t t n : Jeremiah P. O s t r i k e r

R o b e r t B. S t rass le r

PG&E ( 3 ) 3400 C r o w C a n y o n R o a d San R a m o n , CA 94583 A t t n : S teve H e s t e r

K a y F i r o r K e e n e M. Matsuda

POLY DYNE 1 2 3 0 Sharon Park D r i v e S u i t e 6 1 Menlo P a r k , CA 94025 A t t n : Pe te r B o s

POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF NEW YORK 333 Jay S t ree t B r o o k l y n , NY 1 1 2 0 1 A t t n : A n n - C h r i s t i n e A l b e r t s o n

PROA 4 0 1 9 E d i t h B l v d . NE B u i l d i n g 2 B A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 87 1 0 7 A t t n : C o n r a d Seagroves

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO.

80 Park Plaza Floor 1 6 A P. 0. B o x 570 N e w a r k , N J 0 7 1 0 1 A t t n : Harry Roman

PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO P. 0. B o x 840 Room 420 D e n v e r , CO 8 0 2 0 1 A t t n : J i m Wilson

PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW MEXICO ( 2 ) A l v a r a d o Square A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 8 7 1 5 8 A t t n : Frank B u r c h a m

D o n Martinez

PURDUE UNIVERSITY ( 2 ) P o t t e r B l d g . Rm 322 West L a f a y e t t e , I N 47907 A t t n : G e r a l d i n e V e s t

R o b e r t V e s t

PV ENERGY SYSTEMS 2 4 0 1 C h i l d s ' Lane A l e x a n d r i a , VA 22308 A t t n : Paul D. Maycock

P V I PUBLISHING 2250 N. 1 6 t h S t ree t S u i t e 1 0 3 Phoenix, AZ 85006 A t t n : Mark F i t zge ra ld

QUEENSLAND FINANCIAL GROUP 350 S. Figueroa, #498 L o s Angeles, CA 9 0 0 7 1 A t t n : Warren Shoun

R J R TECHNICAL COMPANY 1 1 0 0 R e y n o l d s B l v d . W i n s t o n - S a l e m , NC 27102 A t t n : Pe te r V a l e n t i

RSA ARCHITECTS 5 0 1 1 MacFarland Lane Woodland H i l l s , CA 9 1 3 6 4 A t t n : R i c h a r d Schoen

RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE P.O. B o x 1 2 1 9 4 R e s e a r c h T r i a n g l e Park, NC 2 7 7 0 9 A t t n : M. F. L a m o r t e

RESOURCE PLANNING ASSOC. 50 C h u r c h S t ree t C a m b r i d g e , MA 0 2 1 3 8 A t t n : J a m e s L e v i t t

4 2

Page 40: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

'

RICHWAY ENTERPRISES 6752 R o c k g l e n A v e . San Diego, CA 9 2 1 1 1 A t t n : R i c h a r d L. Q u i n c e y

RICHWAY ENTP. , INC. c/o Pacif ic L o c a t i o n s 250 F i r s t S t r e e t , S u i t e 250 C l a r e m o n t , CA 9 1 7 1 1 A t t n : Jack D. R i c h w a y

RIDGEWAY ENTERPRISES 8 1 8 1 T a p i n V i a R. C u c u m o n g a , CA 9 1 7 3 0 A t t n : Francis J. V a n S t r a l e n

SALT RIVER PROJECT P. 0. B o x 1 9 8 0 Phoenix, AZ 8 5 0 0 1 A t t n : Steve C h a l m e r s

SAN DIEGO GAS ELECTRIC CO. 1 1 0 W. A Street B o x 1 8 3 1 San D i e g o , CA 9 2 1 1 2 A t t n : Wes G o o d w i n

SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY Dept. of Physics San Diego, CA 9 2 1 8 2 A t t n : A l a n R. S w e e d l e r

S C I E N T I F I C ANALYSIS , INC. 4249 L o m a c S t ree t S u i t e C M o n t g o m e r y , AL 3 6 1 06 A t t n : A l l e n G u n n

S E R I ( 4 ) 1 6 1 7 C o l e B l v d . G o l d e n , CO 8 0 4 0 1 A t t n : R i c h a r d D e B l a s i o

L. K a z m e r s k i T. Surek E. W i t t

SOH10 ( 2 ) 3092 B r o a d w a y C l e v e l a n d , OH 4 4 1 1 5 A t t n : L. T r a n

R. C u l l

SOLAR ELECTRIC CO. OF NM 2700 E s p a n o l a NE A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 8 7 1 1 0 A t t n : Steve V e r c h i n s k i

SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRY ASSN. 1 1 56 15th S t r e e t NW S u i t e 520 Washington , DC 20005 A t t n : C h a r l i e G a y

SOLAR I N I T I A T I V E C i t i c o r p P laza , S u i t e 900 1 8 0 G r a n d A v e n u e O a k l a n d , CA 9 4 6 1 2 A t t n : Jer ry Yudelson

SOLAR INVERTER 8480 C l i f f r i d g e L a n e L a J o l l a , CA 92037 A t t n : J a m e s R o s s

SOLAR U T I L I T Y NETWORK P.O. B o x 4590 For t Worth, TX 7 6 1 0 6 A t t n : S. A. V a r n o o s

SOLAREX CORPORATION ( 2 ) 1 3 3 5 Piccard D r i v e R o c k v i l l e , MD 20850 A t t n : Daniel Bumb

H a l M a c o m b e r

SOLAVOLT INTERNATIONAL 3646 E. A t l a n t a Phoenix, A2 85040 A t t n : B r u c e L a r s o n

SOLEC I N T ' L INC. ( 3 ) 1 2 5 3 3 C h a d r o n A v e n u e H a w t h o r n e , CA 90250 A t t n : G e o r g e M c C l u r e

D a v i d R. K i l l i n g t o n Ishaq Shahryar

SOLLOS, INC. 1 5 1 9 C o m s t o c k A v e n u e Los A n g e l e s , CA 90024 A t t n : Mi lo Macha

SOUTHERN CAL EDISON P. 0. B o x 800 R o s e m e a d , CA 91770 A t t n : N. Patapoff

SPECIALTY CONCEPTS, INC. 9025 E t o n A v e , S t e D C a n o g a Park, CA 9 1 3 0 4 A t t n : Tom B. P h i l p

4 3

Page 41: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

SPECTROEAB, INC. 12500 G l a d s t o n e A v e n u e Sylmar, CA 91342 A t t n : A l e x G a r c i a

S P I R E CORPORATION ( 3 ) P a t r i o t s Park B e d f o r d , MA 01730 A t t n : Anthony A r m i n i

R o g e r G. L i t t l e Mark B. Sp i tzer

SPRINGBORN LABORATORIES, I N C 10 Springborn C e n t e r E n f i e l d , CT 06082 A t t n : B e r n a r d Baum

Paul B. W i l l i s

STANDARD O I L COMPANY (Ohio) 1608 Midland B l d g . C l e v e l a n d , OH 44115 A t t n : T o b y K. A l f r e d

STANDARD O I L COMPANY (Ohio) 4440 Warrensville C e n t e r Rd . C l e v e l a n d , OH 44128 A t t n : R o n a l d C. C u l l

STRATEGIES UNLIMITED 201 San A n t o n i o C i r c l e S u i t e 205 M t . V i e w , CA 94040 A t t n : R o b e r t S tee le

SUNELCO CORP. ( 3 ) 1619 South R a n c h o Santa Fe Rd . San Marcos, CA 91007 A t t n : E d M. B a l d w i n

Fred N o b i l e R o b e r t A. Shade, Jr.

SUPERWAVE TECHNOLOGY 2895 N o r t h w e s t e r n Pky. Santa C l a r a , CA 95125 A t t n : B r u c e Minaee

SYSTEMS DEL SOL 10933 L o s A l a m i t o s B l v d . L o s A l a m i t o s , CA 90720 A t t n : Cra ig P. B o y d

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 71 5 Market S t . C h a t t a n o o g a , TN 37401 A t t n : Dexter S t a n p h i l l

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC s P.O. Box 225936, M/S 147 Dallas, TX 75265 A t t n : Jules D. L e v i n e

THE GRINDELWALD LETTER P.O. Box 70 Mammoth L a k e e , CA 93546 A t t n : A l f r e d H. C a n a d a

THE PASADENA PROJECT 3858 E a s t C o l o r a d o B l v d . Paeadena, CA 91107 A t t n : A n d r e w 0. Jensen

E d w a r d A. Sequeira

UHL 61 LOPEZ ENGRS. 213 T r u m a n NE A l b u q u e r q u e , NM 87108 A t t n : D a v e Penasa

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION O l d R i d g e b u r n R o a d D a n b u r y , CT 06817 A t t n : James L. Young

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION ( 2 ) 3333 Index S t r e e t Washougal, WA 98671 A t t n : S r idha r K. Iya

Hiroshi Morihara

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES ( 2 )

E l e c t r i c a l E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t 7732 B o e t l e r H a l l L o 6 Angeles, CA 90024 A t t n : Fred A l l e n

P a t r i c i a D. Sparks

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA E l e c t r i c a l E n g i n e e r i n g G a i n e s v i l l e , FL 32611 A t t n : F redr ik A. L i n d h o l m

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-CHICAGO C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g Mechanical and Metallurgy D e p t . C h i c a g o , I L 60680 A t t n : Steven D a n y l u k

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA D e p a r t m e n t of E l e c t r i c a l E n g i n e e r i n g 308 Moore D2 Phi lade lphia , PA 19104 A t t n : Mart in Wolf

4 4

Page 42: SA'DYA REPOPT The Determination of Optimum Mounting Flat … Optim Mount... · tracking systems are producing more energy than was predicted. Conse- quently, the most cost-effective

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Univers i ty Park LOB Angeles, CA 90089-1 11 2 A t t n : Randell T. S w i m

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON E l e c t r i c a l Engr. Dept. Ar l ing ton , TX 76019 A t t n : Jack F i t z e r

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON J o i n t Center f o r Graduate Study 100 Sprout Road Richland, WA 99352 A t t n : Larry C. Olsen

USAF P.O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87115 Attn : John Hanson

WESTINGHOUSE 1310 Beulah Road P i t t sbu rgh , PA 15235 Attn : Pe te r Wood

WESTINGHOUSE 5301 Cent ra l NE Albuquerque, NM 87108 Attn: B. Weidle

WESTINGHOUSE/AESD ( 2 1 P.O. Box 10864 Pi t t sbu rgh , PA 15236 Attn: D. R. Roberts

E. Ray

WEDTECH CORPORATION 4226 N. Shadydale Covina, CA 91722 Attn: Emilio Font

WES CONSULTING, INC. 20380 town Center Lane, Su i t e 170 Cupert ino, CA 95014 Attn: Wayne E. Shannon

WINDWORKS ( 2 ) R t . 2 Box 44A Mukwonago, W I 53149 Attn: Donald Thomas

Hans Meyer

Max F i n d e l l 836 Rio Arrlba Ave. SE Albuquerque, NM 87123

Dale Haskins P.O. Box 6 Ti jeras , NM 87059

George Warfield Consul t a n t RD 2 Box 264 Vergennes, VT 05491

Melvin E i sens t ad t Attorney a t Law 3225 Candelaria NE S u i t e A Albuquerque, NM 87107

1251 2363 2364 2364 2525 2525 363 2 3661 6000 6200 6220 622 1 622 1 622 1 622 1 622 1 6221 622 1 6223 6223 6223 6223 6224 6224 6224 6224 622 7 8024 3141 31 51

W. Boyer H. Barne t t W. Bower B. Brumley R. Clark J. Freese T. Baca J. Campbell E. Beckner V. Dugan D. Schueler E. Burgess J. Cannon R. Lundgren D. Menicucci ( 2 5 ) B. Pe t t e r son M. Thomas E. Boes G. Jones T. Key H. Post J. Stevens D. Arvizu L. Beavis A. Maish C. S t i l l w e l l J. A. Leonard M. A. Pound C. M. Ostrander ( 5 ) W. L. Garner ( 3 )

3154-3 C. H. Dalin ( 2 8 ) f o r DOE/TIC (Unlimited r e l e a s e )