s. carpenter - geologic storage standards, legislation and regulation: developments and implications...
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
1/74
Steven M. Carpenter, VP
Advanced Resources International, Inc.
Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and
Regulation: Developments and Implications forCommercial Deployment
RECS Monday, June 24th, 2013
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
2/74
2
This presentation is based upon work supported by the Department of EnergyNational Energy Technology Laboratory under DE-FC26-05NT42590 and wasprepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United StatesGovernment. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, norany of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any
legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of anyinformation, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its usewould not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specificcommercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer,or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency
thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarilystate or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Acknowledgement
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
3/74
3
Workshop = participation Feel free to move around = be
comfortable Interrupt me when needed This is about you! Planned discussion points
Order of the Day
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
4/74
4
Regulations: CWA, USDW, UIC (Class II, V, & VI) CAA, EPA MRR Best Available Control Technology (BACT)
Standards: Z-741: Geological storage of carbon dioxide ISO TC-265: Carbon dioxide capture, transportation, and geological
storage
Examples: What does an actual Class V permit look like?
What does an actual MRR submittal look like?
Legislation: Does EPA consider CO2 as a hazardous waste? How is permanent storage defined?
What we plan to cover
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
5/74
5
CCS Roadmap is COMPLEX
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
6/74
6
CWA, USDW, UIC Class II, V, & VI What does an actual Class V permit look like? Lessons learned from our permit
CAA, EPA Mandatory Greenhouse Gas ReportingRule (MRR)
Subparts A, C, W, FF, RR, & UU What does an actual MRR submittal look like?
Best Available Control Technology (BACT) analysisof CCS
Regulation = Permitting
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
7/74
7
Clean Water Act the CWA establishes the basic structure forregulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the US. In 1948,
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, reorganized in 1972 tobecome CWA
Underground Source of Drinking Water (USDW) An aquifer or portion of an aquifer that supplies any public watersystem or that contains a sufficient quantity of ground water to supply
a public water system, and currently supplies drinking water forhuman consumption, or that contains fewer than 10,000 mg/l total
dissolved solids and is not an exempted aquifer.
Underground Injection Control - Is responsible forregulating the construction, operation, permitting, and closure ofinjection wells that place fluids underground for storage or disposal.Wells are regulated into one of 6 classes or categories of wells.
CWA, USDW, UIC
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
8/74
8
UIC Class I Well Disposal
Hazardous Waste Disposal Wells under RCRA ,operating in 10 states, approximately 20% of wells
Non-Hazardous Industrial Waste Disposal Wells,
operating in 19 states, approximately 50% of wells
Municipal Wastewater Disposal Wells, with muchlarge diameter (up to 36 inches) casing and rely ongravity for injection, approximately 30% of wells.
Radioactive Waste Disposal Wells, used to injectwaste which contains radioactive material below the
lowermost formation containing a USDW. There are 0known radioactive waste disposal wells operating in theU.S.
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
9/74
9
Enhanced Recovery Wells approximately 80% - 151,000 wells
Brine & Fluid Disposal Wells approximately 20% wells
Hydrocarbon Storage Wells inject liquidhydrocarbons in underground formations(such as salt caverns) where they arestored, generally, as part of the U.S.Strategic Petroleum Reserve. There are
over 100 liquid hydrocarbon storage wellsin operation.
UIC Class II Wells Oil & Gas
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
10/74
10
Class III mining well - inject fluidsto dissolve and extract mineralssuch as uranium, salt, copper, andsulfur.
50% of salt 80% of uranium Approximately 165 mining sites Approximately 18,500 wells
UIC Class III Wells - Mining
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
11/74
11
Class IV wells are shallow wellsused to inject hazardous or
radioactive wastes into or above a
geologic formation that contains a
USDW. In 1984, EPA banned the use of
Class IV injection wells
32 waste clean-up sites with Class IVwells in the United States, as part of
EPA authorized clean up.
UIC Class IV Wells Shallow
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
12/74
12
>20 well subtypes that fall into Class V Approximately 650,000 Class V wells
in operation nationwide
Includes storm water drainage wells,cesspools, and septic system leachfields
More complex & sophisticated wellstypically deeper and include aquiferstorage, recovery wells, geothermalelectric power, and pilot orexperimental geologic sequestration(GS) projects
UIC Class V Wells various
D 4-14 Observation Wellbore
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
13/74
13
Used for injection of CO2 forcommercial storage
Currently NO Class VI wells Required MRV plans to address:
the relative buoyancy of CO2 mobility in the subsurface corrosivity in the presence of water large anticipated CO2 volumes
UIC Class VI Wells Com CCS
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
14/74
14
EPA GHG MRR
Legal & Regulatory Framework
Title V of the CAA 40 CFR part 75 Acid Rain Program Any electric generation over 25 MW CEMs for NOx, SO2, and CO2If these, then EPA MRR e-GGRT
Subparts A, D, and possibly W, FF, HH, RR, & UU
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
15/74
15
Industries affected by MRR
Electricity generation (D) Adipic acid production Aluminum production Ammonia manufacturing CCS Projects (RR, UU) Cement production HCFC-22 production HFC-23 destruction processes Industrial Waste Landfills Industrial WWTP Lime manufacturing Magnesium production Manure systems
Natural Gas Production (W) Nitric acid production Petrochemical production Petroleum refineries Phosphoric acid production Silicon carbide production Soda ash production Suppliers of NG (NN) Suppliers of Industrial GHG (OO)
Suppliers of CO2(PP) Titanium dioxide production Underground Coal Mines (FF)
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
16/74
16
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
17/74
17
Electric Signature and Authorization
1. ~ 1 week to process2. Snail Mail3. Maintain email
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
18/74
18
Register facility (one per address)
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
19/74
19
Certificate of Representation
AstheDesignated
Representa0ve(DR)
orAlternateDR,
Icer0fythat
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
20/74
20
I certify that I was selected as the designated representative oralternate designated representative, as applicable, by an agreementbinding on the owners and operators of the facility or supplier, asapplicable.
I certify that I have all the necessary authority to carry out myduties and responsibilities under 40 CFR Part 98 on behalf of the
owners and operators of the facility or supplier, as applicable, andthat each such owner and operatorshould be fully bound by myrepresentations, actions, inactions, or submissions.
I certify that the owners and operators of the facility or supplier, asapplicable, should be bound by any order issued to me by theUSEPA Administratoror a court regarding the facility or supplier.
If there are multiple owners and operators of the facility or supplier,as applicable, I certify that I have given a written notice of myselection as the designated representative or alternate designatedrepresentative, as applicable, and of the agreement by which I wasselected to each owner and operator of the facility or supplier."
Designated Felon
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
21/74
21
Illustrative Representation of Requirements
MRR Reporting Requirements
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
22/74
22
MMR RR Monitoring (MRV) Plans
Required for RR projects Unclear if they are required for R&D exemption projects
(we submitted one for the SECARB Test)
Should complement Class VI UIC MVA plan Required components:
Delineation of the maximum monitoring area (MMA) Delineation of the active monitoring areas (AMA) Identification of potential surface leakage Surface leakage detection strategy Surface baseline monitoring strategy Well ID number(s) Date to begin collecting data
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
23/74
23
MMR RR Monitoring (MRV) Plans
A list of all units, operations, processes, and activities The data used to calculate the GHG emissions Identify surface leakage pathways (EOR focus: legacy wells) Baseline measurements (pre-injection conditions) Calculation methodologies and accounting (2012 CBI rule) Continue Post Injection Monitoring Until No Leakage Risk The Annual GHG reports Retained record for any missing data Certification & QA/QC data of instrumentation 3 years of post-injection monitoring
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
24/74
24
Schedule and Timing
January 1: Register facilit(ies)
March 31: Data reporting previous year
April 1: GHG Monitoring or QA/QC Plan:
Identification of responsibilities (i.e., job titles) for data collection Explanation of processes and methods used for data collection Describes QA/QC procedures Existing corporate documents (e.g., SOPs) Yearly revision to the Plan to reflect changes in processes Upon request make available for audit
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
25/74
25
Submit data electronically
Submitdata
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
26/74
26
Subpart RR Exemption Requests
To date, 4 R&D exemptions have been granted:
No RR Facilities have reported
ADM/MGSC Class I AEP/EPRI Class V Boise/BSCSP Class V Southern Co Class V
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
27/74
27
Best Available Control Technology
All OPTIONS WITH PRACTICAL POTENTIAL
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
28/74
28
Best Available Control Technology(BACT) 5 Step Process:
Step 1: ID all available technologies Step 2: Eliminate technically infeasible options Step 3: Rank remaining technologies Step 4: Evaluate most effective controls Step 5: Select BACTs
New Source Review, Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration & Title V:
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
29/74
29
After January 2, 2011 BACT must address GHGs WHIJTCCS defines, and EPA considers CCS as
an available add-on technology,THEREFORE:
Must include in Step 1 Analysis: Identify May exclude in Step 4 Analysis: Evaluate In either case, CCS clearly warrants a
comprehensive consideration and a detailedcase-specific analysis needed to dismiss
Best Available Control Technology (BACT)
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
30/74
30
What is happening to CCS under BACT
Immediately dismissed due to economicconsiderations
Immediately dismissed due to technologicalconsiderations
Immediately dismissed due to deploymentissues
Immediately dismissed due to uncertain regulatoryissues
What is happening to CCS under BACT
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
31/74
31
What is expected under BACT is
Preliminarily evaluation of CO2 source Preliminarily evaluate of CO2 sink capacity Evaluate the regulatory status in the jurisdiction Only then, make a decision about CCS applicability
New Source Review, Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration & Title V
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
32/74
32
CO2 under BACT
EPA CCS rule to White House (OMB) for review: EPAs rules would exclude CO2 as Hazardous Waste Proposed in August 2011, OMB has 90 days to review By announcing the proposed rule, the EPA has determined
that geological sequestration does not present a substantialrisk to people's health or the environment
EPA also says injecting carbon dioxide into the ground haslong been used for producing gas and oil in so-calledenhanced recovery techniques. Long-term undergroundstorage, however, raises a host of new issues, partlybecause it would potentially involve much larger
quantities of carbon dioxide EPA CCS rule could cap CO2 emissions at 1,000 pounds CO2/
MWh
To date EPA has received more than 3,000,000 comments onthe rule
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
33/74
33
Integration Communication is Key!
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
34/74
34
What are standards? Best Practices Z-741: Geological storage of
carbon dioxide
ISO TC-265: Carbon dioxidecapture, transportation, andgeological storage
Standards
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
35/74
35
Standards, by themselves, do not have the force oflaw unless officially adopted by a regulatoryauthority.
Regulatory authorities can(should) adoptStandards with certain exceptions or additionalrequirements
recommended that the regulatory authority of therelevant jurisdiction be consulted
Where this Standard conflicts with regulatoryrequirements, the regulatory requirements will(shall) take precedence.
Standards a go-by
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
36/74
36
reliable and consistent standards
essential forproviding the basis for a legal and regulatoryframework and encouraging widespread global CCSdeployment:
MVA
Public Outreach Geologic Storage Formation Classification Site Selection, Screening, & Characterization Risk Analysis & Simulation
Best Practices a stronger go-by
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
37/74
37
Clean Development Mechanism, established underthe Kyoto Protocol
Managed by the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
Primary International Offset Program for GHGreduction in developing countries
Generates Certified Emission Reductions (CER) orcarbon credits = financial mechanism for
implementation
What is a CDM?
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
38/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
39/74
39
Afforestation Electric generation fuel switching SF6 emission reductions Landfill methane (CH4) collection CMM & VAM Manure management CCS (recently added)
Types of CDM Projects
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
40/74
40
Z-741 Kills 2 Birds with 1 Stone
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
41/74
41
World's first formally recognizedCCS standard Geologic Storage
International Standards Organization - 31000,17024, 14064, 14065
International Performance Assessment Centrefor Geologic Storage of CO2 Seed document
Canadian Standards Association - ISOSecretariat, standards developer
Bi-national agreement between USA & Canada
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
42/74
42
Brings together 2 nations, multiplestakeholders
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
43/74
43
Reference Publications Management Systems Site Screening, Selection &
Characterization Risk Management Site & Well Development Monitoring & Verification (MVA) Closure
TOC and Working Groups
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
44/74
44
Must INCLUDE any and all
UNFCCC - IPCC ISO EU European Directives CSA DOE WRI IPAC-CO2 Federal, Provincial, State regulations Future expected directives
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
45/74
45
40 people, beer, pizza & hockey
40 = 52 = 47
Game 7 Boston (US) v.Vancouver (CAN) in a bar
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
46/74
46
International Organization for Standardization(ISO) Technical Committee TC-265
Title: Carbon dioxide capture, transportation,and geological storage
Acceptance of Z-741 by Standards Council ofCanada and American National StandardsInstitute (ANSI) is seed document for
TC-265 26 countries participating and NGOs
Why not take on the World?
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
47/74
47
Twined Secretariat: Canada & China
Participating Countries: Observing Countries:
o Australiao Canadao Chinao Franceo Germanyo Italyo Japano South Koreao Netherlandso Norwayo
South Africao Spaino Switzerlando United Kingdomo United States
o Argentinao Brazilo Czech Republico Egypto
Finlando Indiao Irano New Zealando Serbiao Swedeno United StatesNGO/Liaison:o GCCSIo IEAGHGo WRIo others
No in 2012
Yes in 2013
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
48/74
48
CSA is the Mirror Committee
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
49/74
49
Capture: led by Japan, will focus largely on post-, pre-and oxyfuel combustion capture processes
Transportation: let by Germany, will focus onpipelines not currently covered by existing ISO/TC-67
standards Storage: split leadership with Canada focusing on
onshore and Japan focusing on offshore.
Quantification and verification: split leadership withChina leading the group and support provided byFrance
Cross-cutting issues: has split leadership withFrance leading the group supported by China
5 Working Groups
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
50/74
50
Select US Head of Delegation (HoD) for USTechnical Advisory Group (TAG) TC-265
General call for technical and subject matter expertsto join the five working groups
Select Working Group Leaders for the 5 WG Countries that are voting or P-member nations may
identify and add technical experts to all committees
Populate Capture, Transportation, Storage,Quantification and Verification, and Cross-cuttingworking group to address issues
Next Steps
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
51/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
52/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
53/74
53
Perpetual Event Horizon
Sequestration to Storage; CCS to CCUS MMV to MRV to MVA Perpetual Event (Time) Horizon
Sequestration requires 00s & 000s years monitoring, verification and reporting
Perpetual Event Horizon WILL outlast: Risk & Financial models Companies who placed the CO2 Companies who manage the CO2
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
54/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
55/74
55
Carbon Pricing 10 to $80 Liability: Price-Anderson Act Indemnification Insurance products Preemption state & local v. federal Lack of success
Other Wild Cards
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
56/74
56
AEP Mountaineer
Poster-child for success; CCPI, RCSP funded Pilot successful NO LONGER IN OPERATION
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
57/74
57
Dominion VCHEC
CCPI, RCSP not funded
NO CCS
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
58/74
58
Office Locations
Washington, DC
4501 Fairfax Drive, Suite 910Arlington, VA 22203Phone: (703) 528-8420
Fax: (703) 528-0439
Houston, TX11931 Wickchester Ln., Suite 200Houston, TX 77043
Phone: (281) 558-9200Fax: (281) 558-9202
Knoxville, TN603 W. Main Street, Suite 906
Knoxville, TN 37902Phone: (865) 541-4690Fax: (865) 541-4688
Cincinnati, OH
1282 Secretariat CourtBatavia, OH 45103Phone: (513) 460-0360
Email: [email protected]
http://adv-res.com/
Thank you!
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
59/74
59
Back up and Supporting Slides
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
60/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
61/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
62/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
63/74
63
Advanced MRV Technology:CCP Modular Borehole Monitoring
Cintronelle / Plant Barry project CCP, EPRI Southern Co, SECARB cooperators Goal: a "rugged" modular multi sensor CO2
monitoring system in small diameter but deepwells.
Semi-permanent flat sensor string including fiberoptic cable and sample tubing down the annulusbetween the long string casing and injectiontubing and right through the packer into theinjection zone.
Can determine plume location with geophonearray; Crosswell, offset VSP, walk-away VSP.
Reservoir pressure & T using quartz P/T sensors Heat-pulse monitoring =/- 0.1 deg C
sensitivity leak detection / flow monitoring Fluid sampling via U-tube.
63
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
64/74
64
EXAMPLE APPLICATIONS
Coal vs. NG Water cooling vs. air cooling Simple cycle vs. combined cycle California Renewable Portfolio Standards CCS and international standards
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
65/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
66/74
66
Proposed NG Gas Plant May SetTighter GHG BACT Permit Precedent
The BACT for GHG emissions for the AESproject is a rate of 1,082 pounds of carbondioxide per megawatt hour (CO2/MWhr) of grossenergy output, and a total annual CO2 emissions
limit of 3,161,785 metric tons per year.
By comparison the average emission rate forNG fired power is 1,135 lbs of CO2/MWh
By comparison the average emission rates forcoal fired power 2,249 lbs of CO2/MWh
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
67/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
68/74
68
Proposed NG Gas Plant May SetTighter GHG BACT Permit Precedent
A simple-cycle plant, which does not include theheat-recovery steam generators, would result inmore GHG emissions
Simple-cycle vs. combined-cycle turbinesystems has emerged as a key issue in GHGpermits
Wisconsin officials rejected a request by EPARegion V to consider mandating more efficientcombined-cycle gas turbines in a final GHGpermit due to space (air cooled) issues
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
69/74
69
Proposed NG Gas Plant May SetTighter GHG BACT Permit Precedent
EPA Region IX approved a simple-cycle system forthe Pio Pico Energy Center "peaking" power plant inCA
AES Huntington Beach project, planned at two moreAES facilities in the coming months, could set a newGHG emissions or energy efficiency threshold EPAor local regulators must follow for future proposals
AES PSD permit application with the South CoastAir District ALSO must contain renewable power at a
significantly higher energy efficiency rate, helpingutilities achieve Californias stringent renewableportfolio standard (RPS) with fewer GHG emissions
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
70/74
70
Proposed NG Gas Plant May SetTighter GHG BACT Permit Precedent
This may mean that ALL future BACTconsiderations:
Be required to meet enlarged size (footprint)restrictions of air cooled turbines
Be required to meet non-peaker GHGemission rate for peaker designed plants(fast-ramp, fast-start, and ramp-down)
Be required to meet California's RenewablePortfolio Standards (RPS)
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
71/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
72/74
72
CPUC denies PPA to Pio Pico
CaliforniaCommissionQuashes2SanDiegoGasPlantsbyChrisClarkeonMarch21,2134:9PM,KCET.org
TheCaliforniaPublicU0li0esCommission(CPUC)haslikelymadesomeSanDiegoCountyresidentsveryhappytodaywithadecisionnottoallowSanDiegoGas&Electric(SDG&E)tobuypowerfromthecontroversialproposedPioPicoEnergyCenterandQuailBrushPowergas-firedpowerplants.
TheplantswereslammedearlierthismonthbytheSierraClub,whichratedthepairofproposalsasthesecond-mostwastefulu0lityprojectsinthestate.Ifbothhadbeenbuilt,accordingtotheSierraClub,thestate'sratepayerswouldhaveseenacumula0ve$2billionaddedtotheirpowerbills.
S0ll,it'sgottobegra:fyingtothosewhoopposedtheplantstohearthe
CPUCdenythepowerpurchaseagreementsinlanguageremarkablysimilartothatopponentshadused.
UnderBACTwithinclusionofCCScostswillincrease Giventhisscenario,permitapprovaldoesnotlooklikely
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
73/74
-
7/28/2019 S. Carpenter - Geologic Storage Standards, Legislation and Regulation: Developments and Implications for Commercial Deployment
74/74
Injecting Tracer for Monitoring
500 milliliters ofperfluoro-trimethylcylclohexane(CF
3)3C
6F
9 Injected over a
12-hour period byDOE
1-week afterstarting the CO2injection