rural poverty in bhutan

8/7/2019 Rural poverty in Bhutan

1/29

Rural poverty in Bhutan

The isolated, mountainous Kingdom of Bhutan began to open up to the outside world in the 1960s. It has adopted a

policy of cautious modernization, moving away from a generally self-sufficient barter economy based on agriculture. Many

subsistence farmers living outside the cash economy. Despite limited resources and strong population pressure, the

agricultural sector, including livestock and forestry, is the main source of a livelihood for about nine out of ten people.

The distribution of land and other assets is relatively equitable, and few sectors of the population are very rich or very

poor. Yet poverty affects more than 30 per cent of the people, and 96 per cent of Bhutans poor people live in rural areas.

In this rugged country of high mountains and narrow valleys, there is a basic lack of accessible, good-quality land and

other resources. Opportunities for producing food and generating cash income are limited. There is little potential for

expanding irrigation facilities, and much existing irrigation needs rehabilitation. External inputs and services are

inadequate, while farm technology is at a low level.

Who are Bhutans poor rural people?

Bhutans poorest people include subsistence farmers, small traders and day labourers and their households. Some people

work at more than one job in an attempt to earn enough to rise above the poverty level. A minority of poor people are

unemployed or are too young or too old to work.

Women have equal legal status and are not subject to gender discrimination, but they are less mobile than men, and less

active in social and economic life outside of their own villages.

Where are they?

Although there are poor people living in remote villages scattered throughout the country, poverty is deepest in the

countrys eastern zones. About 75 per cent of the poorest households are in the Pemagatshel, Zhemgang, Mongar,

Trashigang and Sampdrup-Jongkhar districts. There is some transfer of poverty when poor people migrate to urban

areas.

Why are they poor?

Poverty in Bhutan has diverse causes, but most are linked to the nature of the land. Because villages are isolated and the

terrain is extremely rugged, people lack access to social and health services and to education and markets. In many poor

communities people have to walk from a few hours to a few days to reach the nearest road head. Students in some

villages have to walk two or three hours each way to reach the nearest primary school.

The population is growing rapidly, but resources and opportunities are limited. Poor people do not own or do not have

access to productive assets such as land. Because of high illiteracy rates and lack of training, rural people do not have the

productive skills and knowledge of technology they need to improve their living standards. They have few opportunities

for off-farm employment and for otherwise generating income. Farmers have little or no access to credit and other

financial services.

Among other factors that aggravate rural poverty in Bhutan are natural calamities such as floods and landslides,

breakdowns in society that disrupt family and social support systems, increasing costs of goods and services, and

illnesses such as malaria and tuberculosis.


2/29

Statistics

GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$) (2009) 2,020.0

Population, total (2009) 697,335.0

Rural population (2009) 448,804.8

Number of rural poor (million, approximate) ..

bhutan

StatisticsTop of Form

Bottom of Form

Jump to...

Social indicators


Population growth (annual %) (2009) 1.5

Population density (people per sq. km) (2008) 17.9


Rural population density (rural population per sq. km of arable land) (2005) 282.0

Rural population (% of total population) (2009) 64.4

Birth rate, crude (per 1,000 people) (2008) 21.5

Death rate, crude (per 1,000 people) (2008) 7.1

Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births) (2009) 52.4

Mortality rate, under-5 (per 1,000) (2009) 78.6

Life expectancy at birth, total (years) (2008) 66.1

Labor force, total (2008) 287,384.9

Labor force, female (% of total labor force) (2008) 38.9

Poverty indicators


3/29


Poverty headcount ratio at rural poverty line (% of rural population) ..

Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population) ..

Income share held by lowest 20% (2003) 5.4

Education

School enrollment, primary (% gross) (2009) 109.1

Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above) (2005) 52.8

Health

Health expenditure, total (% of GDP) (2007) 4.1

Physicians (per 1,000 people) (2007) 0.0

Improved water source, rural (% of rural population with access) (2008) 88.0

Improved sanitation facilities, rural (% of rural population with access) (2008) 54.0

Prevalence of HIV, total (% of population ages 15-49) (2007) 0.1

Agriculture and Food

Food imports (% of merchandise imports) (2009) 14.6

Food production index (1999-2001 = 100) (2007) 154.0

Crop production index (1999-2001 = 100) (2007) 174.0

Cereal yield (kg per hectare) (2008) 1,947.1

Fertilizer consumption (100 grams per hectare of arable land) (2007) 9.6

Environment

Land area (sq. km) (2008) 38,394.0

Forest area (% of land area) (2007) 83.8

Arable land (% of land area) (2007) 3.3

Irrigated land (% of cropland) (2003) 23.5

Economic Indicators


GDP (current US$) (2009) 1,277,107,438.0

GDP per capita growth (annual %) (2009) 5.8

Inflation, consumer prices (annual %) (2009) 4.4

Agriculture, value added (% of GDP) (2009) 17.6

Industry, value added (% of GDP) (2009) 45.0

Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP) (2009) 6.4

Services, etc., value added (% of GDP) (2009) 37.4


4/29

General government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP) (2009) 22.0

Household final consumption expenditure, etc. (% of GDP) (2009) 14.6

Gross domestic savings (% of GDP) (2009) 63.6

Trade

Merchandise exports (current US$) (2009) 280,000,000.0

Merchandise imports (current US$) (2009) 550,000,000.0

Balance of merchandise trade (US$ million) (2009) -270,000,000.0

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) (2009) 36,366,666.7

Government finance

Revenue, excluding grants (% of GDP) (2009) 22.7

Expense (% of GDP) (2009) 23.1

Present value of debt (% of GNI) (2008) 54.6

Total debt service (% of exports of goods, services and income) ..

Official development assistance and official aid (current US$) (2008) 86,530,000.0

Deposit interest rate (%) (2007) 4.5

Lending interest rate (%) (2007) 14.0

External debt, total (DOD, current US$) (2008) 692,440,000.0

Technology and infrastructure

Mobile phone subscribers (2008) 251,000.0

Fixed line and mobile phone subscribers (per 100 people) (2008) 40.5

Personal computers (per 100 people) (2007) 2.5

Internet users (per 100 people) (2008) 6.6


5/29

Rural poverty in the Republic of Maldives

Maldives has no significant poverty, according to an assessment carried out in 2004 by the government with the support

of the World Bank and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Between 1997 and 2004, the number of

persons living with incomes below one dollar a day fell from 8,000 to 2,000, less than 1 per cent of the population.

But some segments of the population remain vulnerable. Compared to neighbouring countries, income distribution in

Maldives is relatively unequal. Between 1997 and 2005 there was a noteworthy increase in inequality between Mal, the

capital island, and the atolls. During that period the median per capita income per day in Mal increased from 1.7 times

to 2.3 times the income of people living in the atolls.

The islands that comprise Maldives are widely dispersed and have a low population density. This increases the cost ofliving, including transport costs, and the cost of delivering essential social and administrative services to people in the

outer, remote atolls.

Who and where are the countrys disadvantaged people?

Although the overall incidence of poverty has decreased, some vulnerability persists, and poverty remains high on many

farming and fishing islands. Islanders in the northern part of the country have particularly low incomes, and migration of

at least one member of the household is a common coping strategy in those areas.

Rural women in general and particularly women who are heads of households are more vulnerable to poverty. They own

few, if any, assets and they cannot obtain credit. Women on the islands rarely travel outside their atoll. They are

primarily in charge of caring for the home and family, cooking, farming, fish processing and collecting firewood and other

necessities. Their role in fishing and marketing of fish is negligible. Inter-island trading by women is virtually non-existent

and income-generating activities are limited to rudimentary and small-scale enterprises. Although women make a

significant contribution to household income and food security by carrying out practically all fish processing and

agricultural activity, their contribution of unpaid labour for the family is taken for granted.

Why are they disadvantaged?

In rural areas of disadvantaged islands, incomes are low because of inadequate production, under-utilized fisheries

resources, a lack of value chain development and inadequate credit for small-scale producers and enterprises. Production

is low because of the scarcity of land and water, unsuitable farming practices and the lack of support services.

http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/home/tags/maldives
http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/home/tags/maldiveshttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/home/tags/maldives


6/29


Bottom of Form

Jump to...

Social indicators



Population density (people per sq. km) (2008) 1,016.8


Rural population density (rural population per sq. km of arable land) (2005) 4,879.8







Labor force, total (2008) 141,619.4


Poverty indicators


Poverty headcount ratio at rural poverty line (% of rural population) ..

Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population) ..


Education



Health







7/29







Environment

Land area (sq. km) (2008) 300.0



Irrigated land (% of cropland) ..

Economic Indicators


GDP (current US$) (2009) 1,356,484,375.0

GDP per capita growth (annual %) (2009) -4.4









Trade


Merchandise imports (current US$) (2009) 967,332,000.0

Balance of merchandise trade (US$ million) (2009) -812,332,000.0


Government finance




Total debt service (% of exports of goods, services and income) (2008) 6.2


8/29




External debt, total (DOD, current US$) (2008) 986,800,000.0


Mobile phone subscribers (2008) 435,627.0




Rural poverty in Nepal

Despite some progress in poverty reduction in recent years Nepal remains one of the poorest countries in the world.

Poverty in Nepal is a deeply entrenched and complex phenomenon. Over 30 per cent of Nepalese live below the poverty

line of US$12 per person/per month. Nothwithstanding declining rates of urban poverty, the problem remains widespread

with indicators suggesting a rise in rural poverty.

About 80% of Nepals population live in rural areas and depend on subsistence farming for their livelihoods. Household

food security and poor nutrition are still major concerns in rural areas. Most households have little or no access to basic

social services such as primary health care, education, clean drinking water and sanitation services. Rural poor people

generally have large families, are landless or have very small landholdings, with high rates of illiteracy and are also

concentrated in specific ethnic, caste and minority groups, particularly those of the lowest caste (dalits) and indigenous

peoples (janajatis). Small, fragmented subsistence farming is a characteristic of Nepalese agriculture, and the average

landholding is only 0.8 hectares. Life is a constant struggle for survival. The most vulnerable and marginalized groups are

the lowest social castes, indigenous peoples and women.

Rural poor people in Nepal include:

destitute people, such as sick or disabled persons, abandoned children and displaced persons

extremely poor people, including illiterate or landless persons or those with very few assets

moderately poor people, such as those who have small farms but are often heavily indebted

people who are nearly poor', including small farmers who are at risk of slipping deeper into poverty as a result

of factors such as conflict, debt and land degradation

Building Peace and Reconciliation

Poverty, lack of economic growth, and increasing marginalization contributed to political unrest and violence which

originated in the highlands of Nepal. A Maoist rebellion that began in 1996 in the remote hill districts of the Mid-Western


9/29

region later intensified and spread across large parts of the country. More than 14,000 Nepalese were killed in the conflict

and about 600,000 have been internally displaced or made homeless. In addition, more than 2 million people are

believed to have fled to India. Fighting occurred largely in rural areas, with agriculture particularly affected.

In November 2006, a comprehensive peace accord was signed between the Government and the Maoists which, apart

form the provisions for disarmament and the end of hostilities, included clauses about the transformation of the country

to a multi-party democratic republic as well as for respect of human, social and economic rights. A re-instated parliament

abolished the monarchy, formed an interim government led by the former Maoist rebels and provided a new interim

constitution for the nation. A Constituent Assembly election in April 2008 and the country entered into the era of 3Rs

(reconciliation, rehabilitation and reconstruction). Though the armed conflict has ended, peace and the political situation

remain fragile.

Why are Nepal's rural people poor?

Land ownership in Nepal has traditionally been concentrated in the hands of a few. For most poor rural families access to

land is extremely limited. Almost 70 per cent of households have holdings of less than 1 ha and many of them depend on

plots that are too small to meet their subsistence requirements. Productivity levels remain low as a result of limited

access to new farming technologies, inputs and extension services.

Because of poor growth in the agricultural sector, living standards in rural areas are deteriorating and poverty is

increasing. The growing population has put huge pressure on cultivable land, especially in the Terai region, which also

supports many landless migrants from the hills.

Many factors contribute to chronic poverty in Nepal's steep and mountainous areas. The rugged terrain makes it difficult

for promoting economic activiy and delivering services . These areas are also physically isolated, with poor

communications and infrastructure and are ecologically fragile. Increasing population pressure has led to unsustainable

use of natural resources, including overgrazing and deforestation. And erosion in the uplands causes flooding in the

lowlands that can be devastating to crop yields.

Who are Nepal's rural poor people?

Social discrimination plays a significant role in keeping the most disadvantaged people in rural Nepal poor and

marginalized. Excluded groups include smallholder farmers, landless labourers, lower castes, indigenous peoples and

women. Discrimination on the grounds of caste is officially illegal in Nepal but is in fact widespread, especially in rural

areas. Members of the lowest caste (dalits, or untouchables) are the most disadvantaged group. Many lower caste dalits

work as wage labourers for higher-caste farmers.

There is a wide gap between women and men when it comes to access to health, nutrition, education and participation in

decision-making. Infant mortality is much higher for girls, and illiteracy is far more common among women than men.

Many rural women live in severe poverty, without any means of improving conditions for themselves and their families.

Within households women often have less to eat than men. Insufficient calorie intake can lead to chronic malnutrition in

the infants they feed.

Lack of economic opportunity and the recent conflict resulted in many of the most productive members of households to

migrate and leave the villages. As a result more and more women have been heading households alone and taking on the

burden of sustaining the rural economy. Women constitute more than 60 per cent of the agricultural labour force but

have little access to land, production technology and training.

Poor families are often obliged to send their children to work rather than to school. In this way the poverty cycle is


10/29

perpetuated into the next generation. It is estimated that about one quarter of the children in Nepal are engaged in some

kind of family or wage labour.

Where are Nepal's rural poor people?

The highest concentration of poor rural people is found in the Mid-Western and Far-Western regions. While the overall

poverty rate for Nepal is 31 per cent, this figure increases to 45 per cent in the Mid-Western region and 41 per cent in the

Far-Western region. In these remote hill and mountain zones the terrain is rugged, rainfall is low and the soil is poor and

difficult to farm. Agricultural holdings per household are the smallest in the country, and access to health, education,

roads, telephones, electricity, water supply and sanitation services is very limited. The conflict has exacerbated the

extreme isolation of these regions.

The Terai plains area has good potential for food production but is increasingly overtaxed by the needs of a growing

population. The number of landless and marginalized poor people is rising in the region.


Bottom of Form

Jump to...

Social indicators

Population, total (2009) 29,330,505.0



Rural population (2009) 24,133,139.5








Labor force, total (2008) 12,935,304.5


Poverty indicators

Number of rural poor (million, approximate) (2009) 8,350,066.3

Poverty headcount ratio at rural poverty line (% of rural population) (2004) 34.6


11/29

Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population) (2004) 30.8


Education



Health












Environment

Land area (sq. km) (2008) 143,350.0




Economic Indicators

GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$) (2009) 440.0

GDP (current US$) (2009) 12,531,144,759.2










12/29


Trade


Merchandise imports (current US$) (2009) 3,550,000,000.0

Balance of merchandise trade (US$ million) (2009) -2,870,000,000.0


Government finance








External debt, total (DOD, current US$) (2008) 3,685,175,000.0


Mobile phone subscribers (2008) 4,200,000.0




Rural poverty in Pakistan

Poverty is widespread in Pakistan and is particularly predominant in rural areas. Nearly two thirds of the population, and

80 per cent of the countrys poor people, live in rural parts of the country.

In 2004-2005 the government estimated that nearly 24 per cent of the people were livingbelow the national poverty line. The percentage of poor people had declined about 10 percent since 2001, but health and education indicators remained low in comparison with


13/29

other countries in South Asia. Socio-economic indicators for women are the lowest in thesubregion.

The recent increase in the international prices of food commodities has had a significantimpact on Pakistans poor people. It is estimated that about 17 million people have joinedthe ranks of the 60 million people who are food insecure. And many more are at risk.About half of the countrys population lives in a condition of food insecurity.

Agriculture is at the heart of the rural economy, and most rural people rely on agriculturefor their livelihoods. But for many of the poorest rural people income depends on non-farm sources.

The incidence of poverty varies between rural and urban areas, and from one province tothe next. Poverty is widely and evenly distributed in the many mountainous parts of thecountry where communities are small, scattered and isolated, and where there are fewmajor urban centres. The rugged terrain and fragile ecosystems make cultivation difficult.Lack of access to markets and services has contributed to chronic poverty in these areas.

Although women play a major role in the household economy and in providing care fortheir families, they are particularly vulnerable. Despite improvements in economicconditions after recent reforms, there are still broad discrepancies in social standingbetween men and women. Women own fewer assets, they have limited economic optionsand less access to social services. They have high rates of illiteracy. And their burden oflabour increases significantly when poor levels of agricultural productivity force men tomigrate to find work.

Most of the land in Pakistan is arid, semi-arid or rugged, and not easily cultivated. Waterresources are scarce throughout most of the country, and it is difficult to provide the moreremote rural communities with a reliable water supply.

Large numbers of rural people are poor because of unequal land distribution. A few largelandholders own a disproportionate amount of land. More than 4 million family farmshave plots of less than 5 hectares, and 25 per cent of all farms consist of less than 1hectare. At present about 50 per cent of farmers own and operate their farms, while 26per cent are tenant farmers. Sharecroppers who work land belonging to large-scalefarmers are often in debt to their employers.

The causes of poverty include lack of education, poor access to health services, largefamily size, gender discrimination and vulnerability to environmental degradation anddeterioration of the natural resource base. A steady decrease in remittances, which nowamount to less than 10 per cent of their level in 1983, was a factor in the increase of

poverty that was seen in the 1990s.


14/29


Bottom of Form

Jump to...

Social indicators

Population, total (2009)169,708,302.

6

Population growth (annual %)

(2009)

2.1

Population density (people per

sq. km) (2008)

215.5

Rural population (2009)107,629,005.

5

Rural population density (rural

population per sq. km of arable

land) (2005)

476.7

Rural population (% of total

population) (2009)

63.4

Birth rate, crude (per 1,000

people) (2008)

30.1

Death rate, crude (per 1,000

people) (2008)

6.9

Mortality rate, infant (per

1,000 live births) (2009)

70.5

Mortality rate, under-5 (per

1,000) (2009)

87.0

Life expectancy at birth, total

(years) (2008)

66.5


| English |franais |espaol

Top of Form

01016001363329 UTF-8

w w w .ruralpover

Bottom of Form

Search by:

Choose topic

Choose region or country
http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=ar_SAhttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=en_UShttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=fr_FRhttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=fr_FRhttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=fr_FRhttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=es_EShttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=ar_SAhttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=en_UShttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=fr_FRhttp://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/statistics?p_p_id=82&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_82_struts_action=/language/view&_82_redirect=/web/guest/country/statistics/tags/pakistan&languageId=es_ES


15/29

Labor force, female (% of total

labor force) (2008)

19.2

Poverty indicators

Number of rural poor (million,approximate) (2009)

38,638,813.0

Poverty headcount ratio at rural

poverty line (% of rural

population) (1999)

35.9

Poverty headcount ratio at

national poverty line (% of

population) (1999)

32.6

Income share held by lowest20% (2005)

9.1

Education

School enrollment, primary (% gross)

(2008)

84.

8

Literacy rate, adult total (% of people

ages 15 and above) (2008)

53.

7

Health

Health expenditure, total (% of GDP)

(2007)

2.7


Improved water source, rural (% of rural

population with access) (2008)

87.

0

Improved sanitation facilities, rural (% of

rural population with access) (2008)

29.

0

Prevalence of HIV, total (% of population

ages 15-49) (2007)

0.1


Food imports (% of merchandise 11.4


16/29

imports) (2009)

Food production index (1999-2001 =

100) (2007)

124.0

Crop production index (1999-2001 =

100) (2007)

117.0

Cereal yield (kg per hectare) (2008)2,673.

6

Fertilizer consumption (100 grams per

hectare of arable land) (2007)

166.2

Environment

Land area (sq. km) (2008)770,880.

0



Irrigated land (% of cropland)

(2005)

85.4

Economic Indicators

GNI per capita, Atlas

method (current US$)

(2009)

1,020.0

GDP (current US$) (2009)166,545,279,959.

3

GDP per capita growth

(annual %) (2009)

1.5

Inflation, consumer prices

(annual %) (2009)

13.6

Agriculture, value added

(% of GDP) (2009)

20.8

Industry, value added (% 24.3


17/29

of GDP) (2009)

Manufacturing, value

added (% of GDP) (2009)

17.7

Services, etc., value

added (% of GDP) (2009)

54.9

General government final

consumption expenditure

(% of GDP) (2009)

10.7

Household final

consumption expenditure,

etc. (% of GDP) (2009)

79.4

Gross domestic savings

(% of GDP) (2009)

9.9

Trade

Merchandise exports

(current US$) (2009)

17,695,000,000.0

Merchandise imports


31,720,000,000.0

Balance of merchandise

trade (US$ million) (2009)

-

14,025,000,000.0

Foreign direct investment,

net inflows (BoP, current

US$) (2009)

2,387,000,000.0

Government finance

Revenue, excluding grants

(% of GDP) (2007)

14.5

Expense (% of GDP)

(2007)

16.3

Present value of debt (% of

GNI) (2008)

24.1


18/29

Total debt service (% of

exports of goods, services

and income) (2008)

8.7

Official development

assistance and official aid


1,539,360,000.0

Deposit interest rate (%)

(2008)

6.9

Lending interest rate (%)

(2009)

14.5

External debt, total (DOD,

current US$) (2008)

49,337,417,000.

0


Mobile phone subscribers (2008)88,019,744.

0

Fixed line and mobile phone

subscribers (per 100 people)

(2008)

55.7

Personal computers (per 100

people) (2005)

0.5

Internet users (per 100 people)

(2008)

11.1

Top of Form

Bottom of FormTop of Form

Bottom of FormTop of Form

Bottom of Form

Rural poverty in India

The number of poor people in India, according to the countrys Eleventh National Development Plan, amounts to more

than 300 million. The country has been successful in reducing the proportion of poor people from about 55 per cent in

1973 to about 27 per cent in 2004.


19/29

But almost one third of the countrys population of more than 1.1 billion continues to live below the poverty line, and a

large proportion of poor people live in rural areas. Poverty remains a chronic condition for almost 30 per cent of Indias

rural population. The incidence of rural poverty has declined somewhat over the past three decades as a result of rural to

urban migration.

Poverty is deepest among members of scheduled castes and tribes in the country's rural areas. In 2005 these groups

accounted for 80 per cent of poor rural people, although their share in the total rural population is much smaller.

On the map of poverty in India, the poorest areas are in parts of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar,

Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and West Bengal.

Large numbers of India's poorest people live in the country's semi-arid tropical region. In this area shortages of water

and recurrent droughts impede the transformation of agriculture that the Green Revolution has achieved elsewhere.

There is also a high incidence of poverty in flood-prone areas such as those extending from eastern Uttar Pradesh to the

Assam plains, and especially in northern Bihar.

Poverty affects tribal people in forest areas, where loss of entitlement to resources has made them even poorer. In

coastal fishing communities people's living conditions are deteriorating because of environmental degradation, stock

depletion and vulnerability to natural disasters.

A major cause of poverty among Indias rural people, both individuals and communities, is lack of access to productive

assets and financial resources. High levels of illiteracy, inadequate health care and extremely limited access to social

services are common among poor rural people. Microenterprise development, which could generate income and enable

poor people to improve their living conditions, has only recently become a focus of the government.

Women in general are the most disadvantaged people in Indian society, though their status varies significantly according

to their social and ethnic backgrounds. Women are particularly vulnerable to the spread of HIV/AIDS from urban to rural

areas. In 2005 an estimated 5.7 million men, women and children in India were living with HIV/AIDS. Most of them are in

the 15-49 age group and almost 40 per cent of them, or 2.4 million in 2008, are women (National AIDS Control

Organisation).


Bottom of Form

Jump to...

Social indicators

Population, total (2009) 1,155,347,678.0








20/29







Poverty indicators





Education



Health












Environment

Land area (sq. km) (2008) 2,973,190.0




Economic Indicators



21/29

GDP (current US$) (2009) 1,310,170,521,446.6










Trade

Merchandise exports (current US$) (2009) 155,249,000,000.0



Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) (2009) 34,577,000,000.0

Government finance





Official development assistance and official aid (current US$) (2008) 2,107,650,000.0

Deposit interest rate (%) ..








Rural poverty in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan


22/29

Afghanistan is one of the poorest countries in the world. Since the Soviet invasion in 1979, it has been the scene of a

series of conflicts that have continued for three decades.

Poverty in Afghanistan is widespread throughout rural and urban areas. The government estimates that 42 per cent of

the countrys total population lives below the national poverty line. Another 20 per cent of the people live just above that

line and are highly vulnerable to the risk of falling into poverty.

Afghan households tend to be large. They include numerous children and several generations that share the same

dwelling. Agriculture is traditionally the major activity for a large portion of the population, but the sector has suffered

from nearly 30 years of conflict, low investments and natural disasters. The average size of landholdings is small, and as

a result agriculture is rarely the main source of food or income. About two thirds of rural households own some livestock,

and farmers also sell their labour.

Who are Afghanistans rural poor people and where are they?

The incidence of poverty is more severe in rural areas. About 45 per cent of rural people and the nomadic Kuchi people

are poor, as compared to 27 per cent of the urban population.

The poorest rural people include small-scale farmers and herders, landless people and women who are heads of

households. There are an estimated 1 million Afghan widows. Their average age is 35, and 90 per cent of them have an

average of four or more children. Without the protection of a husband, widows suffer from social exclusion in

Afghanistans patriarchal society. Many widows have no choice but to become beggars.

Children aged five or under are the most vulnerable segment of Afghan society. As many as 50 per cent of them suffer

from chronic malnutrition.

The estimated 1.5 million Kuchis are nomadic herders whose livelihood depends heavily on livestock and migration

patterns. As a result of conflict and insecurity, in recent years 15 per cent of Kuchi families have been forced to settlebecause they have lost their livestock and migration routes. They are now among the poorest households in rural areas.

Between 2002 and 2005 there was a major inflow of refugees returning to their homes. The flow has dwindled because of

increasing insecurity, limited economic opportunities and limited access to basic social services. For people who have

resettled after as many as two decades of exile, economic and social reintegration is a serious challenge. And internal

displacement remains a problem. There are as many as 160,000 internally displaced persons, mainly in southern

Afghanistan.

Poverty varies significantly between provinces, from a poverty headcount of 10 per cent to more than 70 per cent.

Poverty is most severe in the Northeast, Central Highlands and parts of the Southeast. The provinces of Daikundi,

Badakhstan, Zabul and Paktika represent large pockets of poverty.

Up to 70 per cent of Afghans are food insecure, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, and high food

prices have recently pushed millions into high-risk food insecurity.

Why are they poor?

A basic lack of resources affects the majority of Afghans who depend on agriculture for their livelihood. There is little

arable land per capita, precipitation is scarse, and climatic conditions are difficult in many parts of the country. Since

1999, recurrent droughts have severly affected the livelihoods of rural households, which had already lost many of their


23/29

assets.

Despite significant improvements since 2001 in governance, social services and transport infrastructure, three decades of

conflict have left most Afghans in conditions of hardship and insecurity. Much infrastructure remains to be reconstructed,

and internal markets are still disrupted.

Poverty in Afghanistan is closely related to:

the high illiteracy rate in rural areas, where 90 per cent of women and 63 per cent of men are unable to read or

write

rural peoples dependance on livestock and agricultural activities for at least part of their income

inadequate land ownership and access to land

lack of irrigation infrastructure

Many rural households are poor because they have incurred heavy debts, or because they live in remote, disadvantaged

areas, or because they have lost the male head of the household. Often one or more members of the households is

disabled.


Bottom of Form

Jump to...

Social indicators

Population, total (2009) 29,802,724.3












24/29



Poverty indicators




Income share held by lowest 20% ..

Education



Health












Environment

Land area (sq. km) (2008) 652,230.0




Economic Indicators

GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$) (2008) 370.0

GDP (current US$) (2008) 10,624,133,953.9

GDP per capita growth (annual %) (2008) -0.4

Inflation, consumer prices (annual %) (2009) -13.2



25/29






Gross domestic savings (% of GDP) (2008) -7.9

Trade





Government finance




Total debt service (% of exports of goods, services and income) ..

Official development assistance and official aid (current US$) (2008) 4,865,080,000.0

Deposit interest rate (%) ..








Rural poverty in Asia


26/29

Almost two thirds of the world's population lives in Asia. Some 4 billion people are scattered throughout rural areas or

crowded into towns and cities on a land area of almost 45 million km2, roughly 17 per cent of the worlds surface. The

region has a highly varied range of climatic and agro-ecological zones. Large areas have been affected by degradation

over the past 50 years. Drier areas are particularly vulnerable, and 39 per cent of the regions population lives in areas

prone to drought and desertification.

Poverty in Asia is a massive problem. Reducing poverty for huge numbers of poor people there is crucial to achieving the

primary Millennium Development Goal of halving poverty by 2015. More than two thirds of the worlds poor people live in

Asia, and nearly half of them are in Southern Asia.

Poverty is basically a rural problem in Asia: In the major countries, 80 to 90 per cent of poor people live in rural areas.

While Eastern Asia and South-Eastern Asia have made impressive progress in reducing rural poverty over the past three

decades, progress has been limited in Southern Asia. And the tsunami that recently struck the region will be taking a toll

for years to come in Indonesia, Maldives, Sri Lanka and Thailand.

Despite wide-ranging diversities in the region, many poor rural people in Asia share a number of economic, demographic

and social characteristics, the most common of which is landlessness or limited access to land. Poor rural households tend

to have larger families, less education and higher underemployment. They also lack basic amenities such as a safe water

supply, sanitation and electricity. Their access to credit, equipment and technology is severely limited. Other constraints

including the lack of market information, business and negotiating experience and collective organizations deprive

them of the power to compete on equal terms in the marketplace.


27/29

Southern Asia

Most of Southern Asia has been left behind in the overall economic upturn in Asia. In the past three decades, the

economies of Southern Asias countries have grown by 4 to 6 per cent and the gross national income by only 1.4 per

cent. Although poverty declined by one third, the incidence of poverty, in terms of the percentage of the population living

below the government poverty line, is higher in Southern Asia than in any other region in the world except sub-Saharan

Africa. Southern Asia continues to have strong gender inequalities, and women continue to suffer severe social

deprivation. While the worldwide ratio of women to men is 106:100, in this region it is only 94:100.

1.1 Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of

population)

East Asia & Pacific16.8%

2005

Europe & Central Asia3.7%

2005

Latin America &

Caribbean

8.2%

2005

Middle East & North

Africa

3.6%

2005

South Asia40.3%

2005
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAY


28/29

Sub-Saharan Africa50.9%

2005

Source

Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of population)

About Population below $1.25 a day is the percentage of the population living

on less than $1.25 a day at 2005 international prices. As a result of revisions

in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be

compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions.

Catalog Sources World Development Indicators

More

View more data of this indicator

Embed this indicator in your site

Hide this

1.2 Poverty headcount ratio at $2 a day (PPP) (% of

population)

East Asia & Pacific

38.7%

2005

Europe & Central Asia8.9%

2005

Latin America &

Caribbean

17.1%

2005

Middle East & North

Africa

16.9%

2005

South Asia 73.9%2005

Sub-Saharan Africa72.9%

2005

Source

Poverty headcount ratio at $2 a day (PPP) (% of population)
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAY/countries/1W?display=graphhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.2DAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.2DAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.2DAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.2DAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAY/countries/1W?display=graphhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.2DAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.2DAYhttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.2DAY


29/29

About Population below $2 a day is the percentage of the population living on

less than $2.00 a day at 2005 international prices. As a result of revisions in

PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be

compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions.

Catalog Sources World Development Indicators

More

rural poverty in bhutan

Documents