rural markets in india 2002

Upload: indicus-analytics

Post on 30-May-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    1/62

    Indicus Analytics 1

    Rural Markets in India

    Submitted to:

    IMA (Associate of Economist Intelligence

    Unit)

    Indicus Analytics

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    2/62

    Indicus Analytics 2

    Section 1: Demographic Profile

    Contents

    Population profile of India 3

    Family Sizes and Dependence in Rural Areas 4

    Distribution of Household Size 5Age and Sex Distribution in Rural India 6

    Progressively Fewer Children Less than 10 years of Age 7

    Family Characteristics 8

    Literate people (Total Population) 9

    Sex Ratio across Demographic Segments in rural areas 10

    Educational Characteristics 11

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    3/62

    Indicus Analytics 3

    Population profile of India

    Parts of

    India

    Total population

    (in millions)

    Percentage

    (%)

    Total No. of households

    (in millions)

    Average

    household size

    Rural 741.6 72.2 148.3 5.0

    Urban 285.4 27.8 63.4 4.5

    Total 1,027.0 100.0 211.7 4.9

    Population

    Rural

    72%

    Urban

    28%

    Bulk of the population is rural more than 740 million Indians reside in

    rural areas.

    Average rural household has five members; slightly higher than in urban

    areas

    Whom and where should marketing efforts be targeted?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    4/62

    Indicus Analytics 4

    Family Sizes and Dependence in Rural Areas

    Population Characteristics Distribution by Economic Class

    Poorest 5%Households

    Richest 5%Households

    All

    Avg. Household Size 6.0 3.6

    Avg. no of adults per Household 3.0 2.8 3.2

    Avg. no of children perHousehold (0 to 10 years)

    3.0 0.7 1.9

    3.6

    5

    6

    Top 5% Average Bottom 5%

    Economic class

    Household Size

    tribution of Household size per 1000 households

    Household sizePart

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+

    Rural 50 91 122 187 190 140 87 52 30 50

    Urban 106 83 131 225 179 118 65 39 20 35

    S: page17

    Poorer households have larger families, and more children

    The better-off have smaller family sizes

    Largely due to fewer children

    More available for lesser people in richer households

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    5/62

    Indicus Analytics 5

    Distribution of Household Size

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Households

    per1000

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+

    Household size

    Distribution of households as per household size

    Rural Urban

    By and large family sizes in rural areas are not highly different from

    urban areas

    Incidence of joint families is only marginally more in rural areas

    Incidence of single person households largely due to migration

    What are the age-sex characteristics?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    6/62

    Indicus Analytics 6

    Age and Sex Distribution in Rural India

    Population Age Profile

    100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100

    < 10

    10 to 20

    20 to 30

    30 to 40

    40 to 50

    50 to 60

    60 to 70

    70 to 80

    80 to 90

    > 90

    Number in millions

    Male Female

    63% of the rural population is below 30 years of age

    Half of the population is aged below 21 years

    For every 100 people in the 20 to 60 year age group there are 117

    dependents (above 60 and less than 20 years).

    A young market

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    7/62

    Indicus Analytics 7

    Progressively Fewer Children Less than 10 years of

    Age

    Population Age Profile

    0 510

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    0 to 2

    2 to 4

    4 to 6

    6 to 8

    8 to 10

    Years

    Numbers in millions

    Fewer children in the 0 to 2 and 2 to 4 age groups

    Reflects falling birth rates

    Population growth will not forever lead market growth

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    8/62

    Indicus Analytics 8

    Family Characteristics

    Family Category.

    Percentage of Allhouseholds

    Average number ofindividuals per household

    Unitary

    (Single person or with spouse)12.2 1.6

    Nuclear

    (Couple with children)50.8 4.7

    Extended

    (Parents with one married child)

    28.2 6.1

    Joint

    (More than one married siblings)4.3 10.3

    Miscellaneous 4.5 8.7

    Most households contain individuals or couples.

    Nuclear households are the norm in rural India.

    Extended households include elders living with married children.

    Nuclear households are the norm and Joint families are an

    exception.

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    9/62

    Indicus Analytics 9

    Literate people

    Literates

    Rural

    (millions)

    Rural + Urban

    (millions)Male 226.3 339.9

    Female 140.4 226.8

    Total 366.7 566.7

    Sex Ratio of Literates(per 1000 males) 620 667

    340

    227

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    PopulationinMillions

    Male Female

    Literates (All India)

    According to the Census 2001, 65.38% of the countrys population is

    literate.

    Females have a much lower literacy rate than men in general.

    Rural women have an even lower likelihood of being literate.

    Though there are more women than men in rural India,

    literate women are significantly fewer

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    10/62

    Indicus Analytics 10

    Sex Ratio

    Sex RatioFemales per

    1000 males

    All Population 933

    Rural 946

    Urban901

    Sex Ratio in Rural and Urban areas

    All Population

    Urban

    Rural

    600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000Females per 1000 male

    Rural India in general has more females per male than in urban India

    This is due to two factors:

    Poorer tend to have greater females per male, and rural population

    tends to be poorer.

    Migration of males to urban areas also contributes

    Significantly larger proportion of females in the population

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    11/62

    Indicus Analytics 11

    Educational Characteristics

    Education Category Rural male (%) Rural female (%)

    Non-literate 40.1 61.1

    Literate below primary 19.6 25.1

    Literate up to primary 13.3 9.8

    Literate up to middle 12.6 7.6

    Literate up to secondary 6.7 3.2

    Up to higher secondary 3.1 1.2

    Graduate and above 2.1 0.6

    Others 1.4 1.2

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Percentages

    Non-literate Literate below

    primary

    Literate up to

    primary

    Literate up to

    middle

    Literate up to

    secondary

    Up to higher

    secondary

    Education levels of usually employed

    Rural male (%)

    Rural female (%)

    About Every 2 in five males are literate; every 3 in five females are

    illiterate in rural areas.

    Among the female employees around 74% in rural India are illiterate.

    The percentage of workers, who are graduates and above, iscomparatively much smaller.

    Large increases in literacy have only generated basic ability to

    read , but education levels continue to remain low

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    12/62

    Indicus Analytics 12

    Section 2: Occupation

    Contents

    Percentage of people in the work force 13

    Primary Employment Characteristics of Head of Household 14

    Finer break-up of Rural Employment Characteristics(%) 15

    Percentage Of work force in a Wage Earning Job Error! Bookmark not defined.

    Land Cultivation: Size of Land and Number of Households 18

    Land ownership and expenditure profile of households 19

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    13/62

    Indicus Analytics 13

    Percentage of people in the work force

    Part of India Male (%) Female (%)

    Rural 54 30

    Urban 54 15

    The work force comprises of people willing and able to workoutside of home.

    Both rural and urban male populations have broadly equalproportions in the work force.

    But rural females are significantly more likely to be in the laborforce than urban females

    Rural females are twice as likely to be working than urban females

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Percenta

    geofpopulation

    Male Female

    People in labor force

    Rural

    Urban

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    14/62

    Indicus Analytics 14

    Primary Employment Characteristics of Head of

    Household

    Nature of workRura

    l

    Urba

    nSelf Employed 46.1 34.4

    Wage/regular/salaried

    workers40.2 55.7

    Others 13.7 9.7

    Employment characteristics of head of household

    0

    1020

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Rural Urban

    Percentage

    Self Employed

    Wage/regular/salariedworkersOthers

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    15/62

    Indicus Analytics 15

    Finer break-up of Rural Employment Characteristics(%)

    Households whose main occupation is:

    Self-

    employe

    d in

    agricultu

    re

    Self-

    employe

    d in non-

    agricultu

    re

    Agricultu

    ral labor

    Other

    laborOthers Total

    32.7 13.4 32.2 8.0 13.7 100.0

    Rural households have a much higher ratio of self ownedbusinesses (46%) .

    Urban households are more likely to be dependent on beingemployed by others.

    41.7% of the urban salaried/wage worker households are employedon a regular basis; 14% are on a casual basis.

    Incomes less stable in rural areas due to lower regular wage employment

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    16/62

    Indicus Analytics 16

    Others Self-employed in

    agriculture

    Self-employed in

    non-agriculture

    Other labor

    Agricultural labor

    The bulk of the rural self-employed households are involved in

    agriculture

    This is also true of those who are employed by others

    Maximum no. of households (around 64%)in rural India earn

    their livelihood by agriculture related activities

    Largely an agriculture based demography

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    17/62

    Indicus Analytics 17

    Age Distribution of Work Force

    Age groupsEmployment rate (Male) Employment rate (Female)

    15 to 25 years49.6 19.3

    26 to 35 years75.3 20.3

    36 to 45 years85.4 21.5

    46 to 55 years85.3 21.2

    56 to 65 years 81.9 18.5

    Employment rate calculated on the basis of those working for awage paying job or working in a family business out of the totalwork force (those able and willing to work)

    Those involved in household chores not included

    Males in lower age groups much less likely to be working that thosein middle and higher age groups

    Females employment rate though significantly lower is more stableacross age groups

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    18/62

    Indicus Analytics 18

    Land Cultivation: Size of Land and Number of

    Households

    Land Cultivated in Ha.Number of Households

    (millions) Percent

    0 to 1 115.9 78.1

    1 to 2 16.4 11.1

    2 to 3 7.5 5.1

    3 to 4 3.0 2.0

    4 to 5 2.2 1.5

    > 5 3.5 2.3

    Total 148.5 100.0

    Most households cultivate insignificant amount of land close tofour fifths.

    Barely 4 percent of the households (5.5 million) cultivate land greaterthan 4 hectares

    Only way farmers economic condition will improve is by greater use of fertilizers and better seeds.

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    19/62

    Indicus Analytics 19

    Land ownership and expenditure profile of households

    Land Owned by Self Employedin Agriculture in Ha.

    Average MonthlyExpenditure (Rs.)

    No. of Households(millions)

    0 to 1 2,256 22

    1 to 2 2,635 12

    2 to 3 2,828 6

    3 to 4 3,401 3

    4 to 5 3,537 2

    > 5 4,303 3

    All Landowning households 2,689 49

    Only about a third of the total households own agricultural land.

    The topmost category in terms of land ownership makes less thandouble monthly expenses the lowest category.

    Indicates large numbers of poorer households

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    20/62

    Indicus Analytics 20

    Section 3: Expenditure Characteristics

    Contents

    Expenditures by All Households.................................................................................................... 21

    Occupations and Expenditures...................................................................................................... 22

    Land Owned by Self Employed in Agriculture and expenditures .................................................. 23

    Expenditure Distribution of an average household........................................................................ 24

    Annual Expenditure per Household and Annual Market Size ....................................................... 25

    Defining Economic Classes........................................................................................................... 26

    Annual Expenditures by Rural Households................................................................................... 27

    Total Amount Spent by different categories of households........................................................... 28

    Rural Market Size Of Different Commodities ................................................................................ 29

    Rural Market Across Expenditure Classes- 1................................................................................ 30

    Rural Market Across Expenditure Classes- 2................................................................................ 31

    How to define Major Economic Classes........................................................................................ 32

    Households Value of Purchases Across Economic Classes........................................................ 33

    Expenditure Profile ........................................................................................................................ 34

    Rural Economic Classes -Expenditures per household............................................................... 35

    Rural Economic Classes - Expenditure Characteristics............................................................... 35

    Expenditure Profiles of Broad Economic Classes......................................................................... 36

    Expenditure Distribution across Broad Economic Classes ........................................................... 37

    Access To Media ........................................................................................................................... 38

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    21/62

    Indicus Analytics 21

    Expenditures by All Households

    Family CategoryAnnual Total

    Expenditure in Rs.

    Annual PerCapita

    Expenditure inRs.

    Average no. ofindividuals per

    household

    Unitary (Single person or with spouse) 12,214 7,973 1.6

    Nuclear(Couple with children) 24,617 5,541 4.7

    Extended (Parents with one married child) 29,909 5,069 5.7

    Joint (More than one married siblings) 51,551 5,078 10.2

    Miscellaneous 42,003 4,916 8.2

    Larger households spend greater amounts in total than smallerhouseholds

    Per capita expenditure falls with household size

    Economies of scale presumably play a strong role in householdexpenditures

    Do occupation play a strong role in determining expenditures?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    22/62

    Indicus Analytics 22

    Occupations and Expenditures

    Type of HouseholdsAverage Yearly Expenditureper household(Rs.millions)

    Households(Rs. millions)

    Total Amount Spent in Rs.Bill.

    Agriculture Labour 20 47

    Self Employed in Agriculture 32 49 1,575

    Other Labour 25 12 291

    Self Employed in Non Agriculture 29 20 577

    Others 29 21 615

    Total 135 149 3,993

    Almost two-thirds of the households depend upon agriculture fortheir main source of livelihood.

    The self-employed tend to have much higher expenditures in ruralareas.

    The self-employed agriculturalists are both greater in number andhave higher spending power than other broad categories

    How does ownership of land impact expenditures?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    23/62

    Indicus Analytics 23

    Land Owned by Self Employed in Agriculture and

    expenditures

    Land Owned (Hectares)Average MonthlyExpenditure (Rs.)

    No. of Households (Millions)Total Amount Spent per Year

    by Households

    0 to 1 2,256 22.2 60,232

    1 to 2 2,635 11.9 37,888

    2 to 3 2,828 6.3 21,425

    3 to 4 3,401 2.5 10,507

    4 to 5 3,537 2.1 9,163

    > 5 4,303 3.4 17,945

    All 2,689 48.7

    About 48 million households are self employed in agriculture

    Land size directly linked with expenditures

    Of these barely 30 percent have land greater than 2 hectares

    Agriculture based households would tend to have lower expendituresthan those in other professions

    Per Household expenditures rise sharply beyond 3 hectares, but

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    24/62

    Indicus Analytics 24

    Expenditure Distribution of an average household

    Areas of expenditure PercentageAllocation

    Food and basic needs 59

    Cereal 22

    Fuel & light 8

    Total non food, nonbasic

    41

    Clothing & footwear 8

    Medical 6

    Toiletries and Misc. 10

    Transport & services 12

    Durables 3

    Others 2

    The major expenditure is in basic requirements that include cereals andother food and fuel

    Non basic expenditures that include everything else, are allocated onlytwo out of five rupees spent.

    Clothing and footwear, and toiletries (e.g. cosmetics, detergents)account for less than half the non basic expenditures.

    Purely manufactured items (above plus durables) account for only onein five rupee spent by a rural household

    Per Household expenditures rise sharply beyond 3 hectares, but total

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    25/62

    Indicus Analytics 25

    Annual Expenditure per Household and Annual Market

    Size

    Expenditure categoryExpenditure per household (Rs.)

    Total Market(Rs. Billion)

    Basics (food and fuel) 18,433 2,710

    Of which, Fuel 1,925 283

    Clothing 2,003 294

    Medical 1,757 258

    Of which, Non-institutional

    Medicine1,365 201

    Toiletries 886 130

    Commuting and Transport 654 96

    Education related articles 413 61

    Institutional Medicine 391 58

    Footwear 331 49

    Rent 117 17

    Entertainment 62 9

    Misc. Goods & Services 770 113

    But these break-ups are likely to be different acrosseconomic classes

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    26/62

    Indicus Analytics 26

    Defining Economic Classes

    First rate households on the basis of its monthly total expenditures

    Then see how various components of expenditures change as total expenditure of thehouseholds increases

    Obtain insights into the same

    Use these insights to define broad economic classes

    Study the expenditure profile of these economic classes

    Answer questions of the type:

    What are the higher economic classes?

    Where are they located?

    What are their other characteristics?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    27/62

    Indicus Analytics 27

    Annual Expenditures by Rural Households

    Annual Expenditute by Expenditure Ranked Households

    0

    20,000

    40,000

    60,00080,000

    100,000

    120,000

    140,000

    160,000

    180,000

    200,000

    020406080100

    Lowest Spending Classes Highest Spending Classes

    ExpenditureinRs.

    Most households spend more than Rs. 24,000 per year

    Top 1% of the households (about 1.5 million) spend greater than Rs.100,000 per year

    Some possibility that high expenditure households are under-reportingexpenditures (dashed line represents this possibility)

    Great potential for low priced commodities

    A large but poor market

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    28/62

    Indicus Analytics 28

    Total Amount Spent by different categories of

    households

    0

    20,000

    40,000

    60,000

    80,000

    100,000

    120,000

    140,000

    0102030405060708090100

    Lowest Spending Classes Highest Spending Classes

    Rs.

    Million

    In total rural household spent about Rs. 4000 billion in the year 2000.

    Of this the higher economic classes spent the largest amounts, despitehaving significantly fewer households

    The poorest sections of the rural population do not have high purchasingpower individually as well as in the aggregate.

    The richest 10% of the households spent Rs. 670 billion, the next 10%spent Rs. 583 billion, the next 10% Rs. 440 billion, a similar amount bythe next 10%.

    Apart from the top and the bottom 10% rest of the households are similarin terms of their spending characteristics

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    29/62

    Indicus Analytics 29

    Market Size Of Different Commodities

    Institutional Medical 58 391

    Footwear 49 331

    Expenditure CategoryTotal Market Size (Rs.Bill.)

    Expenditure perHousehold (Rs.)

    Food 2,452 16,508

    Commuting, Travel & Misc. 326 2,194

    Clothing 298 2,003

    Fuel & Light 286 1,925

    Medical 261 1,757

    Non Institutional Medical 203 1,365

    Durables 146 986

    Toiletries & Cosmetics 132 886

    Food, Clothing, Fuel, and Medical expenditures are the highest householdexpenditure categories.

    Travel, commuting, and miscellaneous services are also a highexpenditure category

    Manufactured items such as durables, toiletries, and footwear bring up the

    rear.

    How do these expenditures differ across expenditure classes?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    30/62

    Indicus Analytics 30

    Market Size Across Expenditure Classes- 1

    Total Expenditures of Rural Households across Economic Classes: Concave

    Expenditures

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Expenditure Class of Households

    Rs

    .Bill.

    Durables Non Institutional Medical

    Institutional Medical Commuting,Travel & Misc

    Commodities with concave expenditures shoot up across higherexpenditure classes.

    With economic growth these expenditures should increase the most

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    31/62

    Indicus Analytics 31

    Market Size Across Expenditure Classes- 2

    Total Expenditures of Rural Households across Economic Classes: Convex

    Expenditures

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Expenditure Class of Households

    Rs.

    Bill.

    Fuel & Light Toileteries & Cosmetics Footwear Clothing

    Commodities with convex expenditures do not shoot up across higher

    expenditure classes.

    Minor fall in prices will greatly increase penetration among lowerexpenditure classes

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    32/62

    Indicus Analytics 32

    How to define Major Economic Classes

    The Broad Economic Classes: Division Based on Durable to Non-Durable

    Expenditures

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Affluent

    Middle

    Mar inall non- oor Poor

    Many ways of deciding the cut-off between broad economic classes

    We use expenditure on durables

    Among lowest expenditure classes, the ratio of expenditures on durablesto non-durables increase in a linear manner (Red and green lines)

    There is however a slight non-linearity among the 22nd to 10th percentiles,(the blue curve) this curvature is strongest in the topmost 9% of thehouseholds (the mauve curve)

    The curve implies that the proportional expenditure on durables increasesat a much higher rate.

    This denotes the poor, marginally non-poor, the middle, and the affluentclasses respectively

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    33/62

    Indicus Analytics 33

    Households Value of Purchases Across Economic

    Classes

    Affluent Middle ClassMarginallyNon-Poor

    Poor

    Top 9% 9 to 22% 22 to 52% 52 to 100%

    Number of households(in millions)

    13 18 45 71

    Number of people(in millions)

    113 123 255 271

    Average yearlyexpenditure perhousehold

    5,790 3,355 2,296 1,228

    All expenditures in Rs.

    The rural consumers can broadly be divided into four categories

    The poor - Bottom 48% of the economic classes

    The marginally poor 22 to 52 percent

    The rural middle class 9 to 22 percent

    The rural affluent Top 9 percent

    We find that there is homogeneity of expenditure profile within a category

    Caution: Rural affluent and middle classes have a very different profile

    than urban affluent and middle classes

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    34/62

    Indicus Analytics 34

    Expenditure Profile

    Basic Goods(Food + fuel)

    Non - Basic

    Durables

    (TV, automobiles, etc.)

    Non-basic Non-Durables(Clothing, footwear, toiletries,etc.)

    Broad hierarchy of expenditures

    Basic and non-basic expenditures

    How do the expenditures differ across economic classes?

    We would expect the poor to spend the bulk of their expenditures on

    basic goods, and insignificant amounts on durables

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    35/62

    Indicus Analytics 35

    Rural Economic Classes -Expenditures per household

    Affluent Middle Class Marginally Non-Poor Poor

    Top 9% 9 to 22% 22 to 52% 52 to 100%

    AYE on Basic commodities 39,983 27,079 19,759 11,183

    AYE on non-basic non-durables 24,269 11,887 7,123 3,256

    AYE on durables 5,223 1,303 679 2

    All expenditures in Rs

    Rural Economic Classes - Expenditure Characteristics

    Affluent MiddleClass

    MarginallyNon-Poor

    Poor

    Top 9% 9 to 22% 22 to 52% 52 to 100%

    Basic/Total 0.57 0.67 0.71 0.75

    Toiletries/Other non-basic non-durables 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.16

    Durable/ Other non-basic non-durables 0.21 0.10 0.09 0.08

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    36/62

    Indicus Analytics 36

    Expenditure Profiles of Broad Economic Classes

    Expenditure

    category

    Annual Expenditure per Household ( in Rs.)

    Affluent Middle Marginal Poor

    Basics (food and fuel)39,983 27,079 19,759 11,183

    Of which, Fuel3,910 2,746 2,060 1,245

    Misc. Goods & Services16,271 6,954 3,734 1,512

    Toiletries 1,951 1,308 937 537

    Medical7,175 2,751 1,498 622

    Commuting & Transport2,392 1,109 590 242

    Education related articles1,709 727 371 110

    Entertainment175 108 60 29

    Rent 285 251 117 49

    Clothing5,099 3,069 2,108 1,063

    Footwear939 554 338 151

    Durables5,223 1,303 679 287

    Total69,466 40,267 27,555 14,733

    Food remains the main expenditure segment across economic classes

    Unlike in urban areas rent is insignificant across various economic classes

    How does the expenditure distribution vary across economic

    classes?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    37/62

    Indicus Analytics 37

    Expenditure Distribution across Broad Economic

    Classes

    Expenditure on basic items like food and fuel increases as the household

    becomes poorer .The poor households spend more than 70% of their total

    expenditure on basic items.

    On the contrary expenditures on miscellineous goods and durables

    decreases as we move across richer to poorer households.

    The share of expenditure on clothing , footware and toiletries, almostremain the same across all economic se ments.

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Percentageoftotalexpenditure

    Affluent Middle Marginal Poor

    Distribution of average yearly expenditure per household

    Durables

    Footwear

    Clothing

    Toiletries

    Misc.

    Goods &

    Services

    Basics(food and

    fuel)

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    38/62

    Indicus Analytics 38

    Access To Media

    Affluent MiddleClass MarginallyNon-Poor Poor All

    Newspapers

    1 17% 3% 1% 0% 3%

    >1 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%

    Television

    Colour 14% 2% 0% 0% 3%

    BW 44% 29% 13% 2% 16%

    Cable

    TV with Cable 14% 4% 2% 0% 3%

    TV w/out Cable 44% 27% 11% 1% 15%

    Radio 61% 44% 28% 14% 30%

    Telephones 8% 1% 0% 0% 2%

    Note: The figures above are estimates and may be biased downwards by about 10 percent.

    Low access to media across economic classes.

    The poor and the marginal classes have insignificant exposure to media

    barring radio.

    Access to cable TV is much higher than access to a telephone.

    Radio has the highest penetration among mass media.

    Low levels of access to all types of media

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    39/62

    Indicus Analytics 39

    Section 3B Seasonality in Expenditures

    Contents

    Seasonality in Rural Consumption Expenditures 40

    Seasonality in Rural Consumption Expenditures: The Affluent and Middle Classes 41

    Seasonality in Rural Consumption Expenditures: The Marginally Non-poor and Poor Classes 42

    Seasonality Across Economic Classes: Comparing the Per household Monthly Expenditures 43

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    40/62

    Indicus Analytics 40

    Seasonality in Rural Consumption Expenditures

    Seasonality: Total Consumption Expenditures

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    25.00

    30.00

    35.00

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Rs

    .Billion

    Rural household consumption expenditures show distinct seasonality

    They tend to follow agriculture cycles

    Rural seasonality differs highly from urban seasonality Note thetrough in October and November

    Is likely to be different across different geographical regions

    Do consumption expenditures differ across economic classes?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    41/62

    Indicus Analytics 41

    Seasonality in Rural Consumption Expenditures: The

    Affluent and Middle Classes

    Affluent expenditures are concordant with major agriculture output selling

    Middle

    3,200

    3,400

    3,600

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Affluent

    5,000

    5,200

    5,400

    5,600

    5,800

    6,000

    6,200

    6,400

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    42/62

    Indicus Analytics 42

    Seasonality in Rural Consumption Expenditures: The

    Marginally Non-poor and Poor Classes

    Marginal

    2,200

    2,400

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Poor

    1,000

    1,200

    1,400

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    The expenditures of the poor are concordant with the harvesting times

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    43/62

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    44/62

    Indicus Analytics 44

    Section 4: The Geography of Rural Markets

    Contents

    Where are the Better-off Households located? ....................................45

    The states in terms of Rural Affluence .................................................46

    The Affluence Rates in Rural sub-regions............................................47

    What determines Rural affluence? .......................................................48

    Consumption characteristics of the affluent..........................................49

    Similar types of affluence across India.................................................50

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    45/62

    Indicus Analytics 45

    Where are the Better-off Households located?

    0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000

    Uttar Pradesh

    Bihar

    Maharashtra

    West Bengal

    Andhra Pradesh

    Rajasthan

    Madhya Pradesh

    Gujarat

    Karnataka

    Kerala

    Tamil Nadu

    Punjab

    Haryana

    Assam

    Orissa

    Affluent Middle Marginal

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    46/62

    Indicus Analytics 46

    The states in terms of Rural Affluence

    States (Only Ruralareas)

    Affluent

    Households in000s

    Middle

    Households in000s

    Affluent

    in State Total(%)

    Affluent + Middle

    in State Total(%)

    Rural Delhi 276 299 36.2 75.4

    Haryana 837 642 30.9 54.6

    Punjab 817 729 27.1 51.3

    Goa 27 45 16.8 45.2

    Kerala 1,004 1,075 20.6 42.7

    Himachal Pradesh 208 258 18.5 41.5

    Rajasthan 1,180 1,560 17.0 39.5

    Gujarat 800 1,135 12.3 29.8Uttar Pradesh 3,125 3,628 12.9 27.8

    Karnataka 618 886 8.0 19.6

    Maharashtra 882 1,412 7.0 18.2

    Assam 154 492 3.9

    West Bengal 584 1,270 4.8 15.4

    Madhya Pradesh 745 1,062 6.2 15.0

    Bihar 723 1,467 4.6 13.8

    Tamil Nadu 529 668 5.2 11.8

    Andhra Pradesh 449 933 3.2 9.7Orissa 194 411 2.9 9.0

    Sorted in descending order by Affluent + Middle in state total

    The Haryana Delhi Punjab rural belt is the highest in terms ofaffluence rates.

    Southern India has the lowest rates of rural affluence

    Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, and Rajasthan have the highest numbers ofthe affluent

    How are the affluent distributed within the states?

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    47/62

    Indicus Analytics 47

    The Affluence Rates in Rural sub-regions

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    48/62

    Indicus Analytics 48

    What determines Rural affluence?

    Afluence and Agriculture Production (Logarithmic Scale)

    10,000

    100,000

    1,000,000

    10,000,000

    100,000,000

    10,000 100,000 1,000,000 10,000,000

    Foodgrain and Pulses Production

    NoofAffl

    uentHouseholds

    .

    Close relationship between presence of affluence and agriculturalproduction.

    However other factors are also important, such as handicrafts,

    rural industry, trade, migration, etc.

    The middle class also follows a similar same relationship.

    The most important relationship of the presence of rural affluent, not surprisingly, is with

    agricultural production.

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    49/62

    Indicus Analytics 49

    Consumption characteristics of the affluent

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    50/62

    Indicus Analytics 50

    Similar types of affluence across India

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    51/62

    Indicus Analytics 51

    Section 5 Trends

    Population Characteristics ..................................................................................52Number of households engaged in different types of work ................................53Number of rural households per every 1000 in different size class of landcultivated.............................................................................................................54Literacy rate ........................................................................................................55Number of persons in different education levels ................................................56Section 5B: How will Rural Markets evolve?.......................................................57Close relationship between Agricultural Value Added and GDP.........................57What would the agricultural GDP be? .................................................................58Demand for Agricultural Inputs ...........................................................................60

    Where would the future take Rural India?...........................................................61The Great Unknowns..........................................................................................62

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    52/62

    Indicus Analytics 52

    Population Characteristics

    Year Household Size Sex Ratio (Females per 100 males)

    1978 5.2 96

    1983 5.1 96

    1988 5.1 95

    1994 4.9 94

    2000 5.0 96

    Minor fall in household size expected to continue at similar

    rates

    Fall in females per male throughout the late seventies till mid

    nineties

    Has it been reversed? Inconclusive evidence

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    53/62

    Indicus Analytics 53

    Number of households engaged in different types of

    work

    Occupation Structure 1988 1994 2000

    Self Employed Agriculture 37.7 37.8 32.7

    Agriculture Labour 30.7 30.3 32.2

    Agriculture 68.4 68.1 64.9

    Self Employed non-Agriculture 12.3 12.7 13.4

    Other Labour 9.0 8.0 8.0

    Others 10.1 11.2 13.7

    Total 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Fall in farmers who cultivate their own land

    Self employment in other activities on the increase

    This may also be the result of absence of other employment

    activities

    Sustained fall in importance of agriculture as a main source of

    employment

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    54/62

    Indicus Analytics 54

    Number of rural households per every 1000 in different

    size class of land cultivated

    Size of Land Cultivated byHousehold in Ha.

    1988 1994 2000

    Less than 0.40 54.4 57.5 63.2

    0.4 to 1.0 17.3 17.1 16.8

    1.0 to 2.0 13.9 13.5 11.2

    2.0 to 4.0 8.6 7.6 5.9

    Greater than or equal to 4.0 5.8 4.3 3.0

    Total 100 100 100

    Sustained fall in size of land cultivated by each household

    Will not be able to take the burden of a large number of rural youth

    Expect a rapid increase in out-migration in the absence of rural

    employment opportunities

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    55/62

    Indicus Analytics 55

    Literacy rate

    Year Male Literacy Female Literacy

    1983 44.9 21.9

    1988 48.4 26.0

    1994 54.5 32.1

    2000 58.8 38.5

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    1983 1988 1994 2000

    Male Literacy Female Literacy

    Rapid advances in the eighties and nineties on the literacy front

    The relative increase for females much higher

    Expected to continue in the next few years

    Populations level of education increasing steadily, but still low by international standards

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    56/62

    Indicus Analytics 56

    Number of persons in different education levels

    Educational attainment 1994 2000 1994 2000

    Male Female Male Female

    Not literate 45.5 41.2 67.9 61.5

    Literate up to primary school 33.7 34.2 23.0 26.0

    Middle school 10.9 12.6 5.6 7.5

    Secondary School and above 9.8 11.7 3.4 5.0

    All 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Though literacy is increasing, the general of education is quite

    low, and is likely to remain so.

    Female education levels are abysmally low

    Current growth rate indicates it will be a long time before a

    significant chunk of the rural population will attain educationalstandards above simple literacy

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    57/62

    Indicus Analytics 57

    Section 5B: How will Rural Markets

    evolve?Close relationship between Agricultural Value Added and GDP

    Agriculture Value Added and GDP at Factor Cost

    Agri Value Added

    GDPatFactorCo

    st

    Strong relation between GDP and Agricultural GDP

    Other factors are not as important econometric analysis

    But it is not clear what causes agriculture growth, they both feed

    into each other.

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    58/62

    Indicus Analytics 58

    Our trend analysis is based on GDP estimate AgricultureValue Added estimate Value of Agriculture Inputs estimates

    What would the agricultural GDP be?

    Agriculture GDP and Overall GDP Trends

    0

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    1960

    1963

    1966

    1969

    1972

    1975

    1978

    1981

    1984

    1987

    1990

    1993

    1996

    1999

    2002

    2005

    2008

    Rs.

    Billion(199

    5ConstantRs.)

    Agriculture, value added (constant 1995 Rs. Bill)

    GDP at factor cost (constant 1995 Rs. Bill)

    In the year 2000 we estimate it to have been approximately Rs.

    4300 billion

    If 6% per annum growth in GDP is to continue through till 2010

    then based on past relationships Agri GDP should be about Rs.

    7000 Billion (at 2000 price levels)

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    59/62

    Indicus Analytics 59

    For every Rs. 1 growth in GDP we have observed a Rs. 0.21 paise

    increase in Agriculture value added in the past. Estimates till 2010

    are based on this finding

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    60/62

    Indicus Analytics 60

    Demand for Agricultural Inputs

    What would be the growth in Agriculture inputs?

    0

    500000

    1000000

    1500000

    2000000

    2500000

    3000000

    3500000

    4000000

    4500000

    1961 1971 1981 1991 2001

    0

    5000000

    10000000

    15000000

    20000000

    25000000

    30000000

    35000000

    40000000

    45000000

    Agricultural machinery, tractors . Fertilizer consumption (metric tons) .

    By 2010 the number of tractors in the country would have doubled

    from about 2 million currently to 4 million.

    Fertilizer growth would be marginally higher from current levels

    of about 20 million metric tones consumed annually, it would

    reach about 42 million metric tons

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    61/62

    Indicus Analytics 61

    Where would the future take Rural India?

    Positives

    Large number of people will enter the workforce

    They will be relatively better educated than their elders

    Better information availability and greater opportunities for

    commerce

    Negatives

    Falling size of land.

    Over dependence on limited land.

    Poor living conditions will continue for the bulk of the population

  • 8/14/2019 Rural Markets in India 2002

    62/62

    The Great Unknowns

    Unlike past growth estimates, these figures are not based on any

    high assumptions of economic growth.

    However changes in the structure of the economy could impact

    them adversely or positively.

    The Great unknowns for the future:

    Political ups and downs

    Dependence on rains

    Impact of WTO

    Large group of young people reaching adulthood positive

    if opportunities exist.

    But what would happen if opportunities are absent?