rtd mobility hub guidelines...mobility hub toolbox– provides a toolbox of hub components and...
TRANSCRIPT
RTD Mobility Hub GuidelinesJanuary 2019
Prepared by:
i
CONTENTS
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Document Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. What Is a Mobility Hub? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Mobility Hub Typologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1 Existing Transit and Mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2 Transportation Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3 Land Use Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4. Mobility Hub Toolbox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5. Appendix A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
11 Murphy, “Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit”; Masabi, ‘Key Factors Influencing Ridership in North America: The Emerging Urban Mobility Ecosystem.”; Parzen, “Shared-Use Mobility Reference Guide”
Why invest in integrated mobility?
Many new mobility providers offer on-demand and shared-use options, bringing increased flexibility and convenience while also reducing the need for users to own a car. When successfully paired with transit, these new and emerging services have the potential to help build a transportation system that is more accessible, more sustainable, and more affordable.
Studies1 have shown that when people use shared-modes they are more likely to also use transit. This is because shared modes provide users with more trip-making options, making it easier for them to live car-free. For example, individuals can use transit for commute trips and local travel, bike share for first-last mile connections, and carshare for large shopping trips or weekend excursions, ultimately allowing them to forgo car ownership entirely. In fact, “supersharers” – those who regularly use multiple shared modes such as carsharing and bike sharing – own half as many household cars as those who only use public transit.
1. IntroductionOver the last decade the transportation landscape has significantly evolved. Demographic shifts, increased urbanization, and changes in employment types and arrangements have put new demands on existing transportation and transit networks. At the same time, breakthroughs in technology have ushered in new vehicles, new services, and new ways to travel. Collectively, this is changing how people think about mobility.
Given these new pressures and opportunities, municipalities throughout the greater Denver region and Regional Transportation District (RTD) recognize the need to rethink how they deliver mobility. This Guidebook, therefore, explores ways for RTD and agencies throughout the region to cost-effectively improve and expand transit access, while also offering customers more ways to make more trips.
Household vehicle ownership by shared-mode experience
Source: Murphy, “Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit”
22 Buchanan et al, “From Sorry to Superb: Everything You Need to Know about Great Bus Stops” 3 Fan et al, “Perception of Waiting Time at Transit Stops and Stations”; Kim et al, “Impacts of Bus Stop Improvements”
To effectively improve transit access and customer mobility, RTD and local stakeholders must first consider some of the core questions surrounding mobility:
• How do people know about their options?
• How do they access them?
• How can they use them in conjunction with transit?
• How can mobility be better integrated into the community?
Addressing these questions is complex and requires a multi-pronged approach, which RTD has taken. The recent First-Last Mile Strategic Plan has defined strategies and policies to improve multi-modal connections to RTD services. These Guidelines complement that effort by looking at what RTD and local partners can do at transit stops and stations to improve mobility and transit access by focusing on the physical and virtual infrastructure elements that are needed to support multi-modal and intermodal trip making. Options such as dedicated space for shared-mobility, enhanced pedestrian connections, integrated trip planning, and local placemaking are all strategies that will allow RTD and municipalities to guide the transition of stops and stations to more comprehensive mobility hubs, ultimately making transit more attractive to more people.
In addition to improving mobility and transit access, mobility hubs also offer municipalities an opportunity to work in tandem with RTD to improve community livability. The introduction of shared modes has put increased demands on streets and sidewalks, forcing cities and municipalities to rethink how these public spaces are managed. The expansion of Transit Oriented Development (TOD) style development has also put an increased focus on the use of public spaces and the transportation – land use connection. Mobility hubs will provide focal
Source: DenverUrbanism
Why are Mobility Hubs important?
“The design and configuration of stops and stations impacts how everyone on the street interacts with the transit system” – NACTO Transit Street Design Guide
Stops and stations are the “front door” of transit and can either attract or deter users based on how they are configured and designed. Well-designed stops with basic amenities such as shelters and benches improve perceptions of transit service and help bolster ridership2. Studies from the University of Minnesota and the University of Utah have found that stops with shelters, benches, sidewalk connections, and real-time information grow ridership more than stops without amenities and that those same amenities reduce perceived wait-time at stops by nearly 50 percent3. As the first place most people interact with the transit system, stops undoubtedly play a crucial role in attracting and retaining riders.
As new mobility options continue to spread across the Metro Denver area, stops will naturally evolve from transit access points to mobility access points. Proactively planning for and guiding this transition will allow both RTD and its municipal partners to ensure stops remain attractive useful places and that the transportation system remains accessible and equitable for all.
3
points as cities around the region work to optimize and manage public space in a way that improves the public realm and maximizes mobility and access for all users. Using mobility hubs to strengthen the connection between mobility, people, and places will allow RTD and municipalities to collectively maximize the shared value of transit and the public experience.
1.1 Document PurposeRTD and municipalities throughout the Metro Denver area have been proactively addressing the evolving transportation landscape by adopting principles and goals that support collaboration, strategic partnerships, placemaking, growth and the integration of new modes. Numerous studies have been done or are currently underway which support the development of a sustainable multi-modal transportation network, embrace innovative technologies, and explore strategic mobility partnerships.
Some examples of recent studies include the Mobility Choice Blueprint Plan (RTD), the North Boulder Mobility Hub project (City of Boulder, RTD, Boulder County and CDOT), the First and Last Mile Strategic Plan (RTD), Mobility Action Plan (City of Denver), and Denveright (City and County of Denver).
These Mobility Hub Guidelines offer a next step for the region by providing different strategies and tools RTD, city and county leaders, and local stakeholders can use as they consider mobility access and how and where alternative mobility can integrate with the existing public transportation system. The Guidelines focus on the factors that contribute to successful mobility hubs by describing the functions, amenities, infrastructure, and services that make it easier for people to access transit and other transportation options. They consider both the physical elements related to access (sidewalks, shared-mode parking, bicycle infrastructure, etc) and the elements that facilitate access (mixed-use environments, real-time information, integrated trip-planning, etc), acknowledging the importance of both.
The Guidelines consist of four main sections:
1. Introduction – Provides an overview and document purpose
2. What is a Mobility Hub? – Defines mobility hubs and their goals and objectives
3. What are the types of Mobility Hubs? – Establishes mobility hub typologies
4. Mobility Hub Toolbox– Provides a toolbox of hub components and guidance on the use of each treatment
While these Guidelines present strategies and actionable steps, it is important to note that success, above all, will hinge on partnerships, local engagement, and a shared vision for the future. Given the complexity of urban mobility, a collaborative approach to planning for and implementing integrated access will be fundamental to ensuring the transportation system continues to work for people of all ages, incomes, and mobility needs.
Lastly, this document represents a snapshot in time. The mobility environment is dynamic and continues to rapidly evolve. RTD Service Development anticipates updating these Guidelines as new information, modes, best practices, and opportunities emerge.
4
2. What Is a Mobility Hub?Mobility hubs are more than just transit stops. They are community focal points that seamlessly integrate various transportation modes, provide supportive multimodal infrastructure, and utilize placemaking strategies to create activity centers that maximize first–mile last-mile connections and increase the reach of transit. Mobility hubs can vary in size, programming, and design depending on the specific context and function of each location. Generally, they are focused on a transit stop or station, but can also include the surrounding area that is accessible within a 5 to 10-minute walk from the stop or station. For example, a parked carshare may be located a block or two from the transit stop, but with proper wayfinding it becomes part of the hub from the customer perspective. Likewise, retail and services such as grocery stores, coffee carts, or health clinics located at or around a transit stop or station can also be considered part of the hub, as they help maximize the hub’s functionality by making it a destination in and of itself.
Ultimately the goal of mobility hubs is to improve transit connectivity and access, thereby making transit more attractive to more users,
by providing multimodal services and activities at or around transit stations. This goal can be achieved by focusing on two objectives: transit and mobility access and placemaking4. These objectives can be achieved by using several strategies, outlined below, which serve to further define the role of mobility hubs within the transportation system. Understanding these objectives and strategies will allow all agencies involved to evaluate and prioritize potential hub improvements and investments.
Because mobility is driven by both land use and transportation factors, the development of successful mobility hubs will require partnerships and mutual investments by both RTD (transit factors) and local municipalities (land use factors).
4 Engel-Yan and Leonard, “Mobility Hub Guidelines: Tools for Achieving Successful Station Areas”
Improve Connectivity and
AccessGoal
Transit and Mobility Access
Objective
Seamless Transfers
Strategy
Balanced Access
Strategy
Value-added Customer Amenities
Strategy
Placemaking
Objective
Mixed-Use Environment
Strategy
Strong Sense of Place
Strategy
Mobility Hub
5
Mobility Hub StrategiesSeamless Transfers: Easy transfers between transit modes and routes and between transit and other modes. Improving the transfer experience reduces customer wait times, encourages the use of sustainable mobility such as transit and other first-last mile modes, and reduces the need for single-occupant vehicle travel.
Balanced Access: Safe and equitable direct access to transit for all users by a variety of modes. High-quality connections between the transit system and the surrounding community allow for increased access by a variety of users and modes and help reduce conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles.
Value-Added Customer Amenities: Elements that respond to customer demand, facilitate transit use, and enhance customer safety and comfort. Amenities, such as shelters and real-time information, improve the customer experience and make transit more attractive by providing convenience, comfort, safety, and information.
Mixed-use/Transit Oriented Development Environment: Attractive destinations that combine diverse uses to create a vibrant urban environment. Clustering a variety of uses near stations increases transit accessibility, expands mode choice, and provides a critical mass of riders.
Strong Sense of Place: High-quality stations that are sensitive to the context of the built environment and the community’s vision. Well-designed stations improve the image and attractiveness of transit, serve as landmarks within the community, and can become destinations in and of themselves.
6
3. Mobility Hub TypologiesWhile all mobility hubs should strive to achieve a balance of the hub objectives by using the strategies described above, the planning and development of these spaces cannot take a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Successful hub development must account for both the land use context and transportation function of each location. Establishing different hub typologies acknowledges the Metro Denver area is a diverse region full of unique challenges and opportunities, which necessitates varying levels and types of mobility investments. The following sections outline the typology categories that can be used to classify hubs: transportation function and land use context. As hubs are developed, they can be defined by typologies from both categories.
3.1 Existing Transit and MobilityTo understand the transportation functions hubs must support, it is important to first identify the existing transit and mobility options in the RTD service area.
RTD is the primary transit provider in the Denver region, covering nearly 2,400 square miles and serving 40 municipalities across eight counties. To serve the 3.03 million people in its service area, RTD provides over 132 bus routes, 9 rail lines, over 80 Park-n-Ride facilities, and demand response services. Additional transit providers in the region include the Colorado Department of Transportation, which offers regional Bustang bus service in and out of Denver, and Transfort, which provides regional express service, called FLEX, between Boulder and Fort Collins.
In 2017, RTD’s average weekday boardings totaled 329,000 across all modes, with the number of annual unlinked passenger trips reaching approximately 98,000,000. RTD bus services accounted for 67 percent of those total unlinked passenger trips5, highlighting the importance of the bus network for regional mobility.
To provide access to these transit options, RTD currently utilizes seven types of transit facilities. These facilities will be starting points for mobility hubs going forward:
• Transit Center (Union Station, Downtown Boulder Station, Civic Center Station)
• Rail Station
• Park-n-Ride with Bus and Rail Service
• Park-n-Ride with Bus Service
• Timed Transfer Hub
• Bus Station
• Bus Stop
67%
25%
7%
1%
Bus
Commuter Rail
Light Rail
Demand Response
RTD Annual Unlinked Passenger Trips by Mode
5 Based on ridership numbers for 2017 reported to the National Transit Database: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/transit_agency_profile_doc/2017/80006.pdf
7
DE
NV
ER
AU
RO
RA
AR
VA
DA
ER
IE
LA
KE
WO
OD
TH
OR
NT
ON
PA
RK
ER
LO
NG
MO
NT
CE
NT
EN
NIA
L
CA
ST
LE
RO
CK
CO
AL
CR
EE
K
PE
RR
Y P
AR
K
WIN
TE
R P
AR
K RO
XB
OR
OU
GH
PA
RK
Bus
Rout
es
Rail
Line
s
Flex
Ride
Zon
e
RTD
Serv
ice A
rea
04
82
Mile
s
\\Tserver18\GIS\939_Denver_WO_4_2018\fig1_RTD_system.mxd
RTD
SER
VICE
ARE
A
8
Tran
sit C
ente
r
Rail
Stat
ion
Park
-n-R
ide
with
Rai
l and
Bus
Ser
vice
Park
-n-R
ide
with
Bus
Ser
vice
Tran
sfer
Sta
tion
Bus
Stat
ion
Bus
Stop
Flex
Ride
Zon
e
RTD
Serv
ice A
rea
03
61.
5M
iles
\\Tserver18\GIS\939_Denver_WO_4_2018\fig9_RTD_stationTypes2.mxd
STAT
ION
AN
D S
TOP
TYPE
S
9
In addition to RTD services, numerous technology-driven mobility services are also available throughout the Metro Denver area. Due to limited data on their usage, it is hard to ascertain whether these modes and services are competing with or complementing transit in the Denver region. Planning for ways to facilitate intermodal trip making with these modes, however, is one way agencies in the area can proactively ensure they complement rather than compete with transit and sustainable mobility.
• Ride hailing: A service providing on-demand door-to-door transportation for a customer, distinguished from traditional taxi service by use of an online-enabled platform to connect passengers in real time with available local drivers providing trips in their personal vehicles. Companies that provide these services are typically referred to as Transportation Network Companies (TNCs). Ride hailing services in Denver include Uber and Lyft.
• Microtransit: IT-enabled private multi-passenger transportation services that serve customers using dynamically generated routes. Passengers are generally expected to go to centralized points to be picked-up or dropped-off. Vehicles can range from large SUVs to shuttle buses. One provider, Chariot, recently piloted services in Denver.
• Shuttles: Corporate, regional, and local shuttles that make limited stops, typically only picking up specified riders. These can be operated by the transit agency, municipality, or a private entity. Examples include the Lone Tree Link, FlexRide, and the Englewood Shuttle.
• Ridesharing/Carpooling/Vanpools: While informal, employer-based or community-organized carpooling amongst friends and neighbors is a long-standing tradition, technology has expanded the communication network to help connect people making similar trips to maximize ridesharing opportunities. One example of technology-driven ridesharing is the Way to Go program, a partnership between the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) and transportation management associations.
• Carsharing: A community of members who have access to cars for short-term rental on an as-needed basis, usually paying based on time or distance. Most carsharing services are station-based, where renters pick up the car from a station and return it to the
same station when they are finished. Similar to a traditional car rental service, except that cars can be rented for shorter time periods, gas and insurance is included, and cars can be rented 24/7 without the cost of staffing a pick-up center. Carsharing services in the Denver include: eGo Car Share, car2go, Zipcar, and Maven.
• Bike sharing: A fleet of bicycles made available for shared use to individuals on a short-term basis, essentially a bike rental service. Customers purchase access to the bikes either at the bike sharing station kiosk, online, or using a smartphone app. Access may be offered hourly or in the form of a monthly or annual pass. “Docked” bike sharing services lock bikes in docks and require that bikes be returned to a docking station. Digital tracking of the bikes helps users located available bikes. Bike sharing services in the RTD service area include Denver B-Cycle and Boulder B-Cycle.
• Shared Micro-mobility: Small human- and electric-powered transportation solutions like e-scooters, e-bikes, and mopeds. Micro-mobility is intended to provide first-last-mile solutions to transit trips or replace short trips (generally those under three miles) taken by transit, private vehicle, or ride-hailing services. Electric bike and scooter services in the RTD service area include Lime, Bird, Lyft, Spin, JUMP, and Razor.
3.2 Transportation FunctionsThe transportation function of hubs is driven by both the activity levels and customer movements at existing stops. The following sections therefore examine the level and type of activity at stops, which will be used to help prioritize investments. The activity analysis of ridership was developed to help narrow down candidate hub locations by identifying places where investments would benefit the highest number of customers. Other factors, however, such as equity and connectivity, should also be considered when selecting sites from the identified list of potential hubs.
3.2.1 Activity ThresholdsTo help prioritize investments, analysis was done to identify locations with the highest total average weekday activity throughout the RTD
106 Thresholds should be evaluated regularly to account for changes in system ridership
service area. The first step in the process was a consolidation of stops based on their main cross street, which condensed opposite side stops (e.g., a northbound and a southbound stop serving the same location) into single locations. This was done to help ensure locations served by stop pairs were not artificially overshadowed by locations where boarding and alighting activity is consolidated at one stop. Following this consolidation process, all locations with total daily activity of less than one (347 stops) were removed from analysis. Next, stops that were clustered at specific locations but did not have the same exact main cross street (e.g., have different gates in their stop name) were manually consolidated. The remaining locations were then ranked and assigned a tier based on their total average weekday activity (boardings plus alightings).
Tier 1 stops are the highest priority for mobility hub locations for RTD and represent the top 1 percent of average daily activity. Tier 2 includes locations within the top 5 percent of stop activity, and Tier 3 locations denote the top 10 percent of activity. Locations that do not meet the Tier 3 threshold are not considered investment opportunities by RTD at this time. The following table shows the activity threshold for each tier, while the map on page 11 highlights these locations throughout the RTD service area.
Hub Activity Thresholds and Tiers
Tier Rank Active Threshold6 Number of Locations in Tier
1 Top 1% 1,400 53
2 Top 5% 270 206
3 Top 10% 150 253
11
AU
RO
RA
AR
VA
DA
ER
IE
LA
KE
WO
OD
LO
NG
MO
NT
03
61.
5M
iles
\\Tserver18\GIS\939_Denver_WO_4_2018\STOPS_DISSOLVE\Street_Intersections_TomTom\BA_byTier.mxd
CAN
DID
ATE
HUB
LOCA
TIO
NS
BY T
IER
Tota
l Ave
rage
Wee
kday
Act
ivit
y by
Loc
atio
n
Tier
1 -
Gre
ater
than
1,4
00
Tier
2 -
270
to 1
,400
Tier
3 -
150
to 2
70
Flex
Ride
Zon
e
RTD
Serv
ice A
rea
BO
ULD
ER
12
3.2.2 Stop FunctionsOnce a location has been identified for investment, further analysis should be performed to identify the dominant customer movements at that location, including where they are occurring. For example, are most customers transferring? Does boarding and alighting take place in the same physical location or is the location served by a stop pair? Is boarding and alighting activity balanced at the location? After this more detailed analysis is performed, amenity investments can be tailored to support the dominant customer movements and configurations at each location.
RTD has identified the following types of customer movements and hub configurations that should be evaluated during this more detailed analysis.
Customer Movements:
Entry: A transit trip encompasses everything from door (origin) to door (destination). Every trip requires at least a few steps (or bike/vehicle miles) to get to the bus stop, light rail station, transit center, or Park-n-Ride where a customer enters the RTD system. Ways to make entering the system more attractive and customer-friendly include clearly-marked stops, real-time information about transit arrival times, opportunities to purchase fare media, comfortable waiting areas, safe and convenient access, and system maps and information.
Transfer: Customers often need to make a transfer between RTD services to complete their trip. This movement should be supported and facilitated by fast, safe pedestrian connections that minimize walk distances and times through close proximity design and expedited crosswalks. Clear wayfinding signage, real-time arrival/departure information, and comfortable/safe waiting areas are also primary investment areas for high transfer activity hubs. Scheduling and timing are also critical at these locations to ensure customer-friendly transfers. The “time penalty” associated with transferring can be a deterrent for transit users and should therefore be minimized to make the trip as attractive and competitive as possible. Positive experience amenities, like retail, should also be considered.
Exit: Amenities that help customers get from where they alight the transit vehicle to their destination make transit a more appealing transportation choice. For example, bicycles or electric scooters for
the “last mile” of a trip should be placed at or as close as possible to the stop or station. Wayfinding for major destinations near the stop or station is also helpful when exiting the system, particularly for visitors.
Hub Configurations:
Consolidated Activity Hubs: Consolidated Activity Hubs are locations where stop activity has been consolidated to a single location (e.g., terminal bus stop at a rail station). Consolidated Activity hubs must support numerous different types of customer movements throughout the day, and thus must provide a baseline level of amenities that make transit attractive and convenient for customers. These amenities include pedestrian connections, shelters, benches, lighting, and basic service information and signage.
Stop Pair Hubs: Stop Pair Hubs are places where there are two physical stops that serve the same location (e.g., a northbound stop and a southbound stop on opposite sides of the street). Typically, each stop has a dominant customer movement – mostly boardings or mostly alightings. Treatments should be tailored to the dominant movement at each stop at these locations. For example, the stop that predominantly serves boardings should make entering the system as customer-friendly as possible. This can be accomplished via clear signage, opportunities to purchase fare media, attractive waiting areas, and system information to help riders plan any transfers. The stop that serves predominately alighting activity should feature amenities that help customers get from where they alight the transit vehicle to their final destination, such as wayfinding. Because access is important for both entering and exiting the system, some investments may be duplicated for both stops. One example of this would be pedestrian connections to and from the stops. Other access modes, such as bike share parking, may not warrant duplicate investments despite their importance for both entering and exiting the system. In these cases, detailed analysis of the specific hub location should be used to determine where best to place these amenities.
3.3 Land Use ContextIn addition to each location’s transportation function, it is important to consider the land use context of the location as well. As part of the First and Last Mile Strategic Plan, RTD identified five land use typologies throughout the Metro Denver area based on land use density,
13
employment density, residential density, and accessibility/service levels. Each of these typologies (Figure 7) has been used here to provide context for the types of access and placemaking strategies that are most appropriate to employ at a given location.
For example, Downtown Denver is a dense urban core with a high diversity of destinations. This environment supports short trip-making, which can be accomplished by foot, bicycle, or scooter, and therefore requires high levels of modal integration. Conversely, low density and single-use locations in suburban residential areas likely have less frequent service and less street activity. Here, it is important to prioritize customer amenities that provide a sense of comfort and safety for transfers to first-last mile modes.
While RTD helps facilitate improved transit access via agreements and licenses with various other mobility providers, additional placemaking and access strategies, such as retail and service amenities or pedestrian and bicycle networks, fall outside the purview of RTD and will require partnerships and coordinated efforts with municipalities and other local stakeholders. This Guidebook is intended to help municipalities select placemaking and access strategies as they work with RTD on the development of mobility hubs.
14Land
Use
Typ
olog
ies
Tab
le
16
Ty
polo
gy
Ex
ampl
es
La
nd U
se
Den
sity
Em
ploy
men
t D
ensi
ty
Re
side
ntia
l D
ensi
ty
Tr
ansi
t Net
wor
k
Key
Acce
ss
Mod
es
Urb
an C
ore
Dow
ntow
n De
nver
an
d Do
wnt
own
Boul
der
Very
hig
h Ve
ry h
igh
High
Hi
gh fr
eque
ncy
trans
it W
alkin
g, b
iking
, sc
oote
rs a
nd
mop
eds,
ca
rsha
re,
rides
ourc
ing
Urb
an
Dow
ntow
n Ar
vada
/Bel
mar
/Gol
den
/Lon
gmon
t, ar
eas
of B
road
way
, Fe
dera
l and
Col
fax
in D
enve
r, DU
ca
mpu
s, A
nsch
utz
cam
pus,
Den
ver
Tech
Cen
ter,
Denv
er
neig
hbor
hood
s
High
Hi
gh
High
Hi
gh fr
eque
ncy
trans
it, lo
cal b
us
Wal
king,
biki
ng,
scoo
ters
and
m
oped
s,
cars
hare
, rid
esou
rcin
g
Subu
rban
M
ixed
No
rthgl
enn
Mar
ketp
lace
Mal
l, W
estm
inst
er P
ark-
n-Ri
de a
rea,
Br
oom
field
Pla
za,
Colo
rado
M
arke
tpla
ce
Shop
ping
Cen
ter
(Tho
rnto
n)
Med
ium
Hi
gh
Med
ium
Lo
cal b
us, r
egio
nal
(rai
l, bu
s),
com
mut
er (r
ail,
bus)
Fle
xRid
e
Wal
king,
biki
ng,
micr
otra
nsit,
rid
esha
ring/
ca
rpoo
ling,
rid
esou
rcin
g,
Park
-n-R
ide,
pr
ivate
shu
ttles
Subu
rban
Re
side
ntia
l Re
siden
tial a
reas
of
Lone
Tre
e,
North
glen
n,
Thor
nton
, Aur
ora,
Lit
tleto
n, P
arke
r, La
kew
ood,
Brig
hton
et
c.
Low
Lo
w
Med
ium
Co
mm
uter
(rai
l, bu
s), F
lexR
ide
W
alkin
g,
Micr
otra
nsit,
rid
esha
ring/
ca
rpoo
ling,
rid
esou
rcin
g,
Park
-n-R
ide
Rura
l US
Hig
hway
285
co
rrido
r, I-
70
Corri
dor,
front
rang
e co
mm
uniti
es (e
xcep
t Go
lden
), pl
ains
co
mm
uniti
es
Very
low
Ve
ry lo
w
Very
low
Fl
exRi
de
Micr
otra
nsit,
rid
esha
ring/
ca
rpoo
ling,
Par
k-n-
Ride
Not
e: T
he ty
polo
gies
, exa
mpl
es, a
nd la
nd u
se, e
mpl
oym
ent,
and
resid
entia
l den
sitie
s sho
wn
here
wer
e de
velo
ped
in th
e
Firs
t-Las
t Mile
Str
ateg
ic P
lan
15
17
Figu
re 8
: Lan
d U
se T
ypol
ogie
s Map
16
4. Mobility Hub ToolboxThis toolbox provides suggested tactics that can be used at mobility hubs by RTD, municipal partners, and developers to improve mobility access, support intermodal trip making, and make transit a more attractive choice to more people. It is intended to serve as a reference during the treatment selection process, recognizing that each location has unique challenges and opportunities.
Once a location has been identified for investment and analysis of key customer movements completed, a detailed hub investment plan can be developed. Each hub plan should be tailored to the specific context and needs of the location, incorporating the tools presented here as appropriate.
Each of the tactics included in this toolbox indicate the hub strategies the tactic supports; identify the key customer movements (functions) the tactic facilitates; and provide guidance on the most appropriate land use contexts in which to use the tactic.
Hub Strategies• Balanced Access
• Seamless Transfers
• Value-Added Customer Amenities
• Mixed-Use Environment
• Strong Sense of Place
Functions• Entry
• Exit
• Transfer
Land Uses• Urban Core
• Urban
• Suburban Mixed
• Suburban Residential
• Rural
177 See: Federal Transit Administration Circular “Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Guidance.” FTA C 4710.1. Issued November 4, 2015.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) Accessible Design requirements ensure transit facilities can be used and accessed by customers of all abilities. This includes features such as firm and stable boarding and alighting pads at stops, tactile curb ramps, and accessible connections to surrounding streets and sidewalks. The U.S. Department of Transportation has developed guidance for transit agency compliance with ADA, which is reflected in RTD’s design standards7. These guidelines should be referenced during all hub upgrades and new development.
ADA requirements include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Accessible walkways and pedestrian paths: For transit stops and stations to be accessible, there must also be accessible routes/paths to and from that stop/station. This means wheelchair-accessible paved sidewalks with minimal slope, curb cuts and tactile pads for crosswalks, and appropriate landing pads for vehicle ramps.
Source: www.ada.gov
• Passenger loading zones: Areas for non-transit vehicles dropping off or picking up passengers with disabilities at transit facilities must also be designed in compliance with ADA regulations. This may include curb ramps, crosswalks with both audio and visual cues, and other accommodations.
• Wayfinding and signs: Mobility hubs must not only connect passengers to transit physically, but also provide information and tools that help customers of all abilities use transit. Wayfinding signs, informational kiosks, and real-time information displays must be designed with consideration for ADA. Providing both an audio and visual option is one way to meet this requirement.
ADA Accessible DesignHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access, Value-Added Customer Amenities, Strong Sense of Place Primary Function(s): All Primary Land Use(s): All
18
Pedestrian access to transit is arguably the most important type of access agencies and municipalities can provide, given the majority of riders arrive at transit stops via walking (see page: The importance of pedestrian connections for ridership growth). Sidewalks that provide safe, clear, visible, and direct links to and from hubs ensure pedestrians can easily access transit. Pathways should be wide, free of obstacles, meet ADA standards, and have minimal curb cuts or driveways.
Based on 2016 sidewalk inventory data from the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG), just over 50 percent of RTD bus stops are within five feet of a sidewalk. Increasing this percentage is a key opportunity for the Metro Denver area to improve mobility access. Examples of RTD stops with missing pedestrian connections and full pedestrian access are shown below to illustrate the impact sidewalks have on stop conditions.
W Ellsworth and Galapago (Source: RTD)
The stop at W Ellsworth and Galapago does not have a paved sidewalk leading to the bus stop, or a landing pad, making it difficult for pedestrians to access. While this street has a lower density of land use, and thus lower pedestrian activity overall, it is still important that safe access to all stops is provided.
W Ellsworth and S Cherokee (Source: RTD)
In contrast, the stop at W Ellsworth and S Cherokee features an ample sidewalk and loading zone, as well as a shelter and bench, making it more far more accessible to pedestrians of all abilities than the first stop pictured.
Pedestrian AccessHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access, Mixed-Use Environment, Strong Sense of Place Primary Function(s): All Primary Land Use(s): Urban Core, Urban, Suburban Mixed, Suburban Residential
19
The importance of pedestrian connections for ridership growth
Transit ridership is comprised of three types of riders: Commuters, Occasional, and All-Purpose. Commuters use transit almost exclusively for work trips, occasional riders use transit only in specific situations, such as attending a sporting event, and all-purpose riders use transit for a variety of trip purposes across all time periods. While all-purpose riders account for only 32 percent of transit riders, they are responsible for over half of all transit trips that are made8. Making it easier for more people to become all-purpose riders, therefore, is a key factor in growing transit ridership.
When examining how all-purpose riders currently get to transit, a 2016 TransitCenter report found 80 percent of those surveyed indicated walking as their typical access mode9. This finding is also locally supported by the 2017 RTD Customer Satisfaction Survey, which found over 70 percent of respondents accessed their RTD stop by walking.
This means cities and municipalities throughout the Metro Denver area can help grow ridership by making it easier for more people to walk to transit. Concentrating development around transit corridors and stations and ensuring safe and pleasant pedestrian connections are fundamental steps cities can take to encourage transit ridership.
Typical Access Mode by Rider Type
Source: Higashide, “Who’s on Board 2016: What Today’s Riders Teach Us About Transit That Works”
8 Higashide, “Who’s on Board 2016: What Today’s Riders Teach Us About Transit That Works” 9 Higashide, “Who’s on Board 2016: What Today’s Riders Teach Us About Transit That Works”
2010 Includes on-street bike lanes, on-street protected bike lanes, and on-street bike routes
Bicycle accessibility elements can help grow transit ridership because they extend the reach of the transit system by increasing customer options for first-last mile connections, which increases the attractiveness of transit and improves its accessibility. There are three major aspects of bicycle accessibility as it relates to the RTD system: road infrastructure for bicycling, safe bike storage, and transit vehicle capacity for transporting bikes.
The stronger a network of bike lanes and paths, the more viable bicycling becomes as a first-last mile complement to transit service. Increasingly, urban areas within the RTD service area are growing their network of bike lanes and routes, particularly in Denver, Highlands Ranch,
Littleton, Lakewood, Arvada, Boulder, and Longmont. According to the most recent bike lane data available from DRCOG, 22 percent of RTD bus stops have a bike facility10 within 50 feet.
Secure bike parking (bike racks, lockers, high-capacity bike shelters) is essential for customers who may need a bike for one end of their transit trip, but not the other. Bike parking at transit facilities also helps relieve pressure for on-vehicle bike transport. 65 percent of RTD stations and Park-n-Rides have at least one bike rack or locker, and RTD’s Bike-n-Ride program is also pursuing additional bike parking solutions such as on-demand parking and higher-capacity bike shelters. The below
chart provides current guidance on the recommended number of bike racks and lockers to provide at different type/size hubs.
Stop Type / Size Recommended U Racks
Recommended Bike Lockers
Stop with Frequent Bus Service 1-2 -
Park-N-Ride with up to 25 spaces
1-2 -
Park-N-Ride with 25-50 spaces 2 2
Park-N-Ride with 50-100 spaces 4 4
Park-N-Ride with 100-300 spaces
5 6
Park-N-Ride with over 300 spaces
6-10 10-20
Major Facility 10-15 24-40
Source: RTD Bus Infrastructure Design Guidelines and Criteria
All RTD buses are equipped with bike racks (except the Free MallRide and Free MetroRide shuttles which serve short distance trip-making within normal biking limits). For light rail service passengers can stand with their bike against the rear or front of any light rail vehicle except
the first car, which is reserved for ADA passengers. Commuter rail also provides bike storage racks in each car.
Bicycle AccessHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access Primary Function(s): Entry, Exit Primary Land Use(s): Urban Core, Urban, Suburban Mixed, Suburban Residential
22%of RTD bus stops have a bicycle facility within 50 feet
65%of stations and park-n-rides have at least one bike rack or locker
100%of all local and regional RTD buses are equipped with bike racks
2111 Turnbull et al, “Park-and-Ride/Pool: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes” 12 Denveright, “DenverMoves:Transit – State of the System”
Park-n-Rides facilitate transit access for customers living in areas not well-suited for local transit service by acting as collection points. Park-n-Rides are often most successful where the time and cost of completing the entire trip in a single-occupancy vehicle is much higher than the time and cost of using a personal vehicle for part of the trip and transit for the remainder. Location access and transit level of service have the greatest impact on consumer choice of Park-n-Rides versus other mode alternatives. Park-n-Rides that provide frequent service across extensive service spans and that also support multiple access modes tend to be most attractive11. In the Denver region, Park-n-Ride demand is highest along rail-lines and at locations where riders can walk, bike, or arrive via other transit options, highlighting the importance of multimodal connections12.
In addition to the formal Park-n-Rides operated by RTD, there are stops around the region that have developed into “informal Park-n-Rides”. These are stops that transit users have identified as preferred access points to the transit network and which are also conveniently accessible by car, even in the absence of a designated Park-n-Ride lot. Generally, they are street-side transit stops riders access by driving and parking on the street or in a vacant or unmonitored lot in the surrounding area. Informal Park-n-Rides can help identify candidate locations for formal Park-n-Rides and areas
where first-last mile connections may be lacking. It is recommended that RTD create an inventory of these locations to determine the scope of this mode and to help identify candidates for new first-last mile connections.
Parking / Park-n-RidesHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access Primary Function(s): Entry Primary Land Use(s): Suburban Mixed, Suburban Residential, Rural
Source: David Sachs, Streetsblog Denver
22
A designated zone for passengers accessing or egressing transit through another motorized transportation option ensures pick-ups and drop-offs do not interfere with transit operations and passengers can make their way safely to or from the transit boarding/alighting area. Such zones have become even more critical as on-demand ridesharing services join existing taxi and shuttle service and carpoolers in requiring space for picking up and dropping off transit customers.
Zones should be located along a right-of-way or in an area of a mobility hub where they do not interrupt the path of the transit vehicles. However, the zone must be close enough to the transit boarding/alighting area to be convenient. In scenarios where these zones are inconveniently located, some drop-off vehicles may look for more convenient spaces and slow down traffic and/or transit service. Depending on demand, a hub may require separate areas for waiting vehicles (taxi stands) versus those dropping off passengers. Vehicles waiting to pick up passengers may be waiting for longer periods of time (like a taxi waiting for customers), in contrast with the higher vehicle turnover of quick drop-offs.
The most common option for accommodating pick-ups and drop-offs is designated curb space with signs and painted curbs. In addition to physically identifying passenger loading zones, it is important to also provide the exact locations to Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) such as Uber or Lyft to integrate into their apps. This ensures specific pick-up/drop-off instructions are sent to both drivers and passengers. These designated spaces are typically easier to implement at large Park-n-Ride facilities in low-density areas with
fewer space constraints but are also important in denser urban areas where there is more competition for curb space. In some cases, curbside pull-outs for pick-up/drop-off vehicles can be provided, which is especially useful where the zone shares a right-of-way with the transit vehicles.
Passenger Loading ZonesHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access Primary Function(s): Entry, Exit Primary Land Use(s): All
Curbside Management Practitioners Guide 9
(Source: NACTO Curb Appeal)
BEFOREUnorganized steets cause friction between vehicles and reduce transit reliability due to blockages.
AFTEROrganizing a street and curb space allows more efficient flow & operations for both transit and general traffic.
Example Pick-up/Drop Off Zone
Source: ITE Curbside Management Practitioners Guide
2313 Parzen, “Shared-Use Mobility Reference Guide.” 14 Reese, “Denver Car Share Program Summary”
Carsharing in RTD Service Area: eGo Car Share, car2go, Zipcar, and Maven
Carsharing can help reduce VMT and car ownership rates, while also encouraging greater transit usage13. Parking for carshare vehicles can either be fixed-space or free-floating, which is typically determined by the carshare provider’s rules. More traditional carshare models are oriented to longer round-trips and use fixed-space parking, which requires users to return a vehicle to the location where they picked it up. These systems are more oriented to “last-mile” connections and should be located close to transit system exit points. Some newer carshare models allow for one-way trips and do not require vehicles to be parked in specific spaces, though municipalities may choose to permit which spaces these providers can use. This model supports shorter trip making and can be used for both first and last mile connections. As such, transit agencies and municipalities should consider space for these vehicles at both system entry and exit points.
Currently RTD supports connections to carshare through a relationship with car2go, which allows carshare vehicle parking at stations around the region. Analysis of car2go rentals from January to March of
2016 found over 2,000 rentals started or ended at an RTD station. In addition, the Denver Carshare Program Summary found 29 percent of carshare members have given up a personal vehicle and 85 percent report using public transit as much or more often since becoming members. With an average annual percent growth in carshare membership of 43 percent14, continuing partnerships with these providers is an opportunity area for RTD to support intermodal trip making and improve mobility.
Carshare AccessHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access Primary Function(s): Entry, Exit Primary Land Use(s): Urban Core, Urban, Suburban Mixed, Suburban Residential (applicable to fixed-space, round-trip models)
Source: chinookbook.com/denver-boulder/ego-carshare-denver
24
Bike sharing in RTD Service Area: Denver B-Cycle, Boulder B-Cycle
Like other bicycling amenities, bike share helps improve the reach of the transit system by improving first-last mile connections, with the added benefit of providing users access to bicycles without the costs and responsibility of ownership. Research shows that in cities with high transit use and bike share, over 50 percent of bike share users report regularly linking bike share trips with transit trips15.
RTD has partnered with B-Cycle - one of the bike share providers - by allowing them to locate stations on RTD property, which makes it easier for users to combine transit trips with bike trips. Denver B-Cycle estimates that over one-third of Denver B-Cycle users combine B-Cycling trips with a transit trip. RTD should continue to work with bike share operators to locate bike share stations at or near mobility hubs to maximize transfer opportunities for customers. Bike share dock configurations can be tailored to each location based on available space.
Bike Share AccessHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access Primary Function(s): Entry, Exit Primary Land Use(s): Urban Core, Urban, Suburban Mixed
15 NACTO Bike Share Station Siting Guide
B IKE SH A RE S TATI O N SITIN G 13
IN T R O D U C TI O N
Angled Dock (45 degrees)
Standard
Double-sided
Back-to-back
Curved or Angled
Right Angle
How much room do you need? A 15 dock example *
Bike share stations can be configured to fit in a variety of spaces. For example, a station that uses angled docks is only 4.5’ wide, ideal for narrow sidewalks. However, the angled plate configuration requires more length for the same number of docks than a standard plate. In contrast, a back-to-back station layout requires significantly more width – 13’ wide – but almost half as much length.
* Approximate measurements for systems using B-Cycle and Motivate systems.
4.5'
52.5'
Standard6’ x 40’
6'
40'
10'
28'
13'
20'
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
B IKE SH A RE S TATI O N SITIN G 13
IN T R O D U C TI O N
Angled Dock (45 degrees)
Standard
Double-sided
Back-to-back
Curved or Angled
Right Angle
How much room do you need? A 15 dock example *
Bike share stations can be configured to fit in a variety of spaces. For example, a station that uses angled docks is only 4.5’ wide, ideal for narrow sidewalks. However, the angled plate configuration requires more length for the same number of docks than a standard plate. In contrast, a back-to-back station layout requires significantly more width – 13’ wide – but almost half as much length.
* Approximate measurements for systems using B-Cycle and Motivate systems.
4.5'
52.5'
Standard6’ x 40’
6'
40'
10'
28'
13'
20'
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
Example 15 bike station configurations
Source: NACTO Bike Share Station Siting Guide
25
Micro-mobility refers to small shared-use vehicles, such as e-scooters and dockless e-bikes. Micro-mobility provides new options for first-last mile transit connections and is best used for short-distance trips in dense urban areas. These vehicles are typically rented through smart-phone apps and can be picked up or dropped off anywhere, making them “dockless”. Despite being dockless, cities can designate locations where these vehicles can be left, or “locked”, at the end of a trip to help maintain organized rights-of-way and station areas. The chart on page 26 provides considerations for different vehicle locking and space placement options.
Micro-mobility in the Denver Region
Micro-mobility in RTD Service Area: Lime, Bird, Lyft, JUMP, Spin, and Razor
RTD has developed a License Agreement with dockless mobility device (DMD) operators, Lime, Bird, Spin, Lyft, Jump, and Razor. The terms of this License indicate specific parking locations for scooters at RTD stations, using a painted stencil/vertical signage and integrating these locations into scooter company apps. Scooters are also not allowed on RTD vehicles, both to keep them in the Denver service area and to reduce on-board transit vehicle clutter.
Currently there is limited data on the use of these emerging technologies. However, programs like the Denver Public Works Dockless Mobility Vehicle Pilot Permit Program are requiring micro-mobility services to gather data on ridership/usage and report it to
the City and County of Denver. Other municipalities may take similar measures as the use of these shared mobility vehicles in public rights-of-way grows.
Micro-mobility AccessHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access Primary Function(s): Entry, Exit Primary Land Use(s): Urban Core, Urban, Suburban-mixed (if surrounded by dense employment)
Source: RTD
26
27
Micro-mobility Access Hub Strategy(s): Balanced Access Primary Function(s): Entry, Exit Primary Land Use(s): Urban Core, Urban, Suburban-mixed (if surrounded by dense employment) Micro-mobility refers to small shared-use vehicles, such as e-scooters and dockless e-bikes. Micro-mobility provides new options for first-last mile transit connections and is best used for short-distance trips in dense urban areas. These vehicles are typically rented through smart-phone apps and can be picked up or dropped off anywhere, making them “dockless”. Despite being dockless, cities can designate locations where these vehicles can be left, or “locked”, at the end of a trip to help maintain
Placement Considerations Pros Cons
Locking Options
Unrestricted: Vehicles can be left anywhere that doesn’t block ADA space
• Easy to understand • Vehicles can be left anywhere,
making trips easier
• Can block sidewalks and crosswalks, hindering pedestrian access
• Can be seen as ‘clutter’, which creates a negative image
Encouraged Placement: Vehicles can be left in most places with some limitations (e.g., must be in the street furniture zone)
• Vehicles can be left most anywhere, making trips easy
• Relatively easy to understand
• Can be difficult to inform users where vehicles can be left
Lock-to: Vehicles must be locked to a fixed object
• Orderly, ensures pedestrian access not impeded
• Parking opportunities may be limited
• May compete with personal bikes
Space Provided
Painted Boxes: Parking area designated with on the ground markings
• Inexpensive, easy to install • Branding opportunity • Provides predictability
• Paint will wear • May not fully address clutter issue • Only for use on wide sidewalks or
areas with limited pedestrian activity
Street Corrals: Designated racks located in the curb lane
• Relatively inexpensive • Easy to understand • Addresses clutter issue • Ensures pedestrian space not
impeded • Provides predictability
• Takes parking away
Signed Sidewalk Racks: Designated racks located on the sidewalk
• Relatively inexpensive • Easy to understand • Addresses clutter issue • Provides predictability
• Only for use on wide sidewalks or areas with limited pedestrian activity
Geo-fencing: The use of GPS or RFID technology to create a virtual geographic boundary
• Requires no physical equipment
• Provides some control over parking
• Easy to designate large areas where vehicles are not allowed
• Accuracy limited, sometimes vehicles not where app shows them to be
• Does not address clutter issue • Relies on users to check app for
geo-fenced areas
Source: NACTO Policy 2018: Guidelines for the Regulation and Management of Shared Active Transportation
Source: NACTO Policy 2018: Guidelines for the Regulation and Management of Shared Active Transportation
2716 Brakewood et al, “A Literature Review of the Passenger Benefits of Real-Time Transit Information” 17 Watkins et al, ““Where Is My Bus? Impact of Mobile Real-Time Information on the Perceived and Actual Wait Time of Transit Riders.”
Infrastructure/Embedded Sign Systems
Several studies have indicated that knowing how many minutes until a transit vehicle arrives makes the wait time “feel” faster to customers (perceived wait time)16. The “peace of mind” real-time information offers to transit riders not only improves the experience for existing users, but also helps attract new riders. Embedded real-time information systems can improve transit’s profile, making it more visible and appealing as a transportation option17.
One option for sharing estimated transit arrival times based on real-time information is through passenger information displays (PIDs). Some PIDs can also offer service information for nearby private mobility providers, such as TNCs, which improves the travel experience for customers who are making intermodal trips. Placing these at high-use stations and major transfer hubs provides easy-to-check information to anyone in the area, closing a gap between those with and without smart phones and/or Internet access. Many systems also provide both audio and
visual arrival updates to ensure persons with visual or hearing-related disabilities or difficulties are not disadvantaged. Agencies should also consider their Title VI and/or Limited-English Proficiency Plan to provide information in multiple languages, when appropriate. Given the cost of initial purchase and maintenance of such signs, their use should be prioritized at major transfer hubs and hubs with high levels of boarding activity.
Web and Mobile Apps
Real-time arrival information provided through a text message, web app, or mobile app system allows users to access service information before they get to their stop or station, making them a complementary investment to PIDs. While information displays help reduce the perceived wait time, increasingly popular apps can reduce actual wait time and/or travel time because anyone with a smartphone can access this information anytime, anywhere. A customer may find that they can take a different route for a faster travel time if they walk an extra few blocks to a different stop. Or, they may decide to stop for coffee if they know ahead of time that their train is running late, rather than spending that time waiting at the station. In addition, these services are generally more cost-effective for the agency than installing and maintaining a screen at every stop in the system. RTD currently offers real-time arrival information through the “Next Ride” web app, which can be accessed on any web browser through RTD’s website, along with several other third-party apps described under ‘Integrated Trip Planning’.
Real-time Arrival InformationHub Strategies(s): Seamless Transfers, Value-Added Customer Amenities Primary Function(s): Entry, Transfer Primary Land Use(s): All
Source: RTD
28
Much like real-time arrival information, tools for trip-planning based on scheduled or real-time data can be provided through physical infrastructure and personal technologies (computers and mobile devices). Touchscreen kiosks in heavily-trafficked areas, like the arrivals area of an airport or a pedestrian plaza in a busy district, can include schedules, maps, and trip-planning options. However, the increasingly popular approach to trip-planning is based on both static and real-time data provided to web and mobile applications.
Rather than referring to multiple paper schedules and maps, customers can simply type their origin and destination into a trip planning app and the program does the work of finding the fastest route. These apps can use static information (all of the scheduled arrival and departure times across the system) or real-time data provided by automated vehicle location (AVL) data. When real-time transit data, real-time traffic data, and trip-planning capabilities merge together, it makes transit easier to use for customers. It also helps users identify the options that are available to them that they may not have been aware of otherwise. An example of these integrated services is Google Maps, which indicates the cost (for some modes, such as TNCs) and maps the fastest route by car, transit, rideshare service, and even walking and biking. The consumer can then select the mode that best suits their needs. While Google Maps offers some options for intermodal trip making, such as combined walking and transit trips, it has a limited capacity for intermodal trip-planning.
RTD has made significant strides to not only keep up with technology, but to continually engage with emerging technologies to provide information to as many customers as possible. RTD makes scheduled
and real-time system data available in the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) so that third-party developers can integrate RTD into their transit planning apps. GTFS is a data format for transit schedules and associated geographic information that functions as a shared language and allows developers to integrate data from any agency into a transit trip planning web or mobile application.
Scheduled GTFS Based Apps Real-time GTFS Based Apps
Go Denver Google Maps
Open Trip Planner (RTD) Moovit
Transit! ezRide
Parkable Transit Tracker
CG Transit Transit App
Walk Score Swiftly
Roadify Transit TripGo
Map Quest Next Ride (RTD)
Apple Maps
Integrated Trip-PlanningHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access, Seamless Transfers, Value-Added Customer Amenities Primary Function(s): Entry, Transfer Primary Land Use(s): All
2918 NACTO “Transit Street Design Guide”
Integrated and electronic fare payment options help facilitate seamless intermodal trip making by allowing customers to pay for all parts of their trip, regardless of mode, with a single ticket or app. This greatly improves the convenience of travel for customers and improves the attractiveness of transit. Currently RTD offers both smart card fare payment (MyRide), and mobile ticketing. This is significant for several reasons. First, these technologies create a solid hardware and software foundation that can be leveraged in the future for integrated ticketing. Secondly, mobile ticketing allows for off-board fare payment which is convenient for customers and reduces passenger boarding times, with dwell per passenger typically falling from 4 seconds per passenger to 2-2.5 seconds per passenger18.
In addition to these options, RTD has also been awarded a grant from the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) to develop an open payment platform that would allow all RTD vehicles to accept multiple forms of payment, including credit cards, student payment cards, etc. The project, which will begin in 2019-20, will also provide new payment reader hardware on LRT and Commuter rail vehicles in place of the current fare readers located at the rail boarding platforms.
Integrated and Electronic Fare PaymentHub Strategies(s): Balanced Access, Seamless Transfers, Value-Added Customer Amenities Primary Function(s): All Primary Land Use(s): All
Source: RTD
3019 www.downtowndenver.com/home/about-us/special-districts/downtown-denver-business-improvement-district/pedestrian-environment/wayfinding/
In order to make transportation decisions, a person must be able to figure out where they are, where they want to go, a path to get to there, and have opportunities to verify they are on the right track throughout their trip. Before web and smartphone apps, printed guides with schedules and system maps were the only option for customers learning to use a system. These were supplemented by large system maps posted at major stops and stations with the relevant timetables listed at a stop. These physical wayfinding tools are still critical in an environment where every rider might not have access to the web or a smartphone. Even those with smartphones will use them for validation.
RTD is continuing to work toward integrating physical and digital wayfinding to better serve its customers. One example of this integration is the Next Ride mobile website. While waiting at a stop, a rider can locate their stop in the app by typing in their stop ID number (located on bus stop sign) or searching for the intersection. The Next Ride app will provide details on the routes that serve that stop and when the next vehicle for each route will arrive based on its real-time location.
In addition to helping customers navigate the transit system, wayfinding infrastructure at and near hubs can help tie together transit and the surrounding neighborhood, creating a stronger sense of place. Signs that help orient customers to their surroundings and highlight key destinations within walking distance help to make the transit experience more enjoyable and user friendly. Signs and maps are also key in alerting pedestrians and others in the area of the existence of transit and other mobility options they may not have been aware of otherwise.
Multi-modal Wayfinding
Since 2013 the New York City Department of Transportation has worked to improve pedestrian wayfinding throughout the city with an initiative called WalkNYC. WalkNYC aims to encourage walking and transit use by providing clear and consistent multi-modal information that improves navigation. Each sign kiosk includes a “heads up” oriented map, which corresponds to the direction the user is facing, the streets in a five-minute walk radius, bike routes, transit lines and entrances, parks, playgrounds, and major landmarks.
A similar pilot program by the Downtown Denver Partnership installed 20 “transit pillars” in the Downtown Denver Business Improvement District to help both residents and visitors navigate the area19. The pillars are installed at transit stops and provide real-time bus arrival times on a digital screen, as well as a map of destinations within walking distance.
WayfindingHub Strategies(s): Seamless Transfers, Value-Added Customer Amenities, Strong Sense of Place Primary Function(s): All Primary Land Use(s): All
Source: www.nyc.gov
3120 RTD Service Development Policies and Standards. Revised July 22, 2016. Page 11.
Shelters play an important role in the customer wait experience. Their primary function is to protect passengers waiting for transit from the elements, providing shade from sun and cover from wind, rain, or snow. Shelters work well when they include benches, however, even a benchless shelter with ample room for standing, leaning, or parking a mobility device is a vast improvement over a stop with no passenger amenities. Shelter sides should be transparent or partially transparent, if possible, so drivers can see if there are customers to pick up and to provide a sense of safety and security. In addition to improving the customer wait experience, shelters also help improve the visibility of transit in the community. Enhanced shelters help elevate transit’s profile within a community and can integrate additional customer experience elements such as real-time arrival information, ticket vending machines, WiFi, and trash receptacles. RTD’s Bus Infrastructure Standard Drawings should be referenced during the development of all shelters.
RTD’s transit network currently services approximately 10,000 bus stops. Of those stops, about 340 have RTD shelters – slightly over 3 percent. The RTD Service Development Policies and Standards document presently puts the minimum threshold for a shelter at 40 boardings per day20. Boardings are only one consideration, however, in shelter placement decisions. Site restrictions, land ownership, installation and maintenance costs, Title VI, and ADA Regulations are all elements that influence RTD’s ability to install shelters.
Currently 24 percent of stops that meet the minimum boardings threshold have an RTD shelter, however in many parts of the service
area RTD shelters are supplemented by commercial and municipal-owned shelters. These commercial and municipal-owned shelters are vital to the system, as RTD does not control most of the land on which its stops are located, and therefore cannot install shelters without collaboration from the land owning and regulating entities. Increasing the number of locations with shelters is an opportunity for both RTD and municipalities to make transit more attractive to more users.
SheltersHub Strategies(s): Value-Added Customer Amenities, Strong Sense of Place Primary Function(s): Entry, Transfer Primary Land Use(s): All
Source: RTD
3221 Kim et al, “Impacts of Bus Stop Improvements”
Studies have shown ridership grows more at stops with shelters, benches, and sidewalk connections than those without them21. Benches provide an opportunity for customers to rest and can make transit appear more comfortable and convenient. They are especially important to riders with physical limitations who may be unable stand for extended periods of time and at locations with less frequent transit service, where customers have longer off-board waits.
RTD has no minimum boardings warrant for installing a bench but typically installs a bench with each shelter, with shelter placement determined by ridership activity. Most RTD Park-n-Rides and stations also have at least one bench for customers waiting for transit service. Rider surveys and engagement can help RTD determine the most strategic locations for investing in benches, so long as the stated warrants and resource allocation process complies with Title VI and ADA regulations and all other laws.
BenchesHub Strategies(s): Value-Added Customer Amenities, Strong Sense of Place Primary Function(s): Entry, Transfer Primary Land Use(s): All
Source: Denver Urbanism
33
Well-lit transit facilities and surrounding areas contribute to a better access and waiting experience, improving the safety and/or perceived safety of the customer. Lighting at a mobility hub not only plays a role in the customer experience, but also helps bus drivers identify stops and the presence of passengers and pedestrians. Furthermore, lighting can maximize the effectiveness of any security cameras, ensuring what is caught on tape is fully visible.
Lighting plans should be designed such that lighting patterns overlap, so no area is entirely dependent on a single lamp, and dark spaces are eliminated. The APTA recommends that lighting for pedestrian walkways be placed about every 30 feet22. This, of course, depends on the bulb/lighting type and surrounding landscaping and land use environment. In areas where lighting is deemed non-critical at all hours, standby lighting (motion-activated or manually-activated) may be appropriate to reduce energy costs and environmental impact. Some transit systems have also started experimenting with solar-powered lighting to minimize environmental impact. Lighting at RTD mobility hubs should be designed in accordance with the illumination standards in the RTD Bus Infrastructure Design Guidelines & Criteria (Section 10).
22 American Public Transit Association. “Security Lighting for Transit Passenger Facilities.”
LightingHub Strategies(s): Value-Added Customer Amenities, Strong Sense of Place Primary Function(s): All Primary Land Use(s): All
Source: www.politico.com/magazine/gallery/2016/05/photos-denver-colorado-urban-redevelopment-10th-osage-000635?slide=0
Lighting at the 10th & Osage Station
34
Successful mobility hubs facilitate both transit service delivery and local placemaking. Placemaking connects the concept of livability to specific locations within a community, bringing a broad, multifaceted goal to a scale that is both relevant and manageable. As existing activity generators within a community, transit stops and stations are convenient locations for municipalities to leverage for placemaking. Integrating active uses such as retail and public space at mobility hubs creates a safe, comfortable, and multi-functional space that maximizes a hub’s functionality.
This approach falls under the umbrella of Transit Oriented Development (TOD), and aligns with the common TOD principles of encouraging mixed-use development near transit and integrating the station with the surrounding community. Mixed-uses, such as service and retail options, provide amenity and design value to transit customers and local residents, and help make these locations more desirable places to travel to and through. They also help transit fully use its available capacity by generating all-day all-week demand.
Retail at a mobility hub creates the opportunity for transit users to trip-chain (complete a variety of tasks or errands within a single trip)
or multi-task. This may include picking up food for dinner on the way home or grabbing coffee while waiting for a bus or train. Hubs may include temporary structures (kiosks, carts, mobile markets, food trucks) and/or permanent retail space. Key services like grocery, banking (ATMs), pharmacy, and laundry/dry-cleaning are well-suited to mobility hubs. Depending on the surrounding land use and hub type/size, retail and services may be located on-site or within a very short walking distance. Mobility hubs can also provide public activity space, which can be coupled with community-led programming, like a farmer’s market, community rummage sale, or holiday festival. With proper panning mobility hubs can be both access points for transit and destinations themselves, making transit more visible, more relevant to the community, and more accessible to more riders.
Services and RetailHub Strategies(s): Mixed-Use Environment, Strong Sense of Place Primary Function(s): All Primary Land Use(s): Urban Core, Urban, Suburban Mixed
Source: modernfarmer.com/2016/02/bus-stop-farmers-markets
Farmer’s Market at the Netpark Transfer Center in Tampa, Florida
35
A mobility hub should be designed to create seamless connections for customers, whether it’s from transit to non-transit or between transit services, and to provide optimal operating conditions for transit. A key component of this is the placement of the hub, which is influenced by service type, land use, and access modes. Generally, hubs in urban locations serving bus transit are on-street, whereas commuter rail stations or park-and-rides in suburban or rural contexts are more suited to off-street locations.
On-street hubs should be designed to maximize pedestrian access and streamline transit operations. Tools for achieving this include far-side stops and bus bulbs that allow transit vehicles to make in-line stops. On-street hubs also provide key placemaking opportunities and should consider wayfinding and shelters that account for the neighborhood context and scale. Off-street hubs should be designed to minimize the deviation required by transit vehicles, as well as any conflicts between pedestrians, buses, and cars.
Hub Placement (On-street vs. Off-street)Hub Strategies(s): Mixed-Use Environment, Strong Sense of Place Primary Function(s): Entry, Exit Primary Land Use(s): All
Critical
Recommended
Optional
Transit stop signs that clearly indicate which routes are served at each location
Restriction of all other curbside activities to ensure transit stops are not obstructed
Wayfinding infrastructure and system maps that help orient customers and help them find their stop and/or destination. Real-time arrival displays provide additional support for boarding and transferring customers.
Managed passenger queues at high-boarding stops speed up boarding and help maintain a clear pedestrian right-of-way
Source: NACTO Transit Street Design Guide Source: NACTO Transit Street Design Guide
On-street Hub Considerations
36
39
Summary of Tactics
Tactic Function Land Use
Entry Exit Transfer Urban Core Urban Suburban Mixed
Suburban Residential Rural
ADA Accessible Design x x x x x x x x Pedestrian Access x x x x x x x Bicycle Access x x x x x x Parking / Park-n-Rides x x x x Passenger Loading Zones x x x x x x x Car Share Access x x x x x X1 Bike Share Access x x x x x Micro Mobility Access x x x x X2 Real-time Arrival Information x x x x x x x Integrated Trip Planning x x x x x x x Integrated Fare Payment x x x x x x x x Wayfinding x x x x x x x x Shelters x x x x x x x Benches x x x x x x x Lighting x x x x x x x x Services and Retail x x x x x x Hub Placement x x x x x x x
Notes: 1 Most applicable for fixed-space, round-trip operating models 2 Requires concentrations of dense employment to be viable
Notes: 1 Most applicable for fixed-space, round-trip operating models 2 Requires concentrations of dense employment to be viable
Summary of Tactics
37
5. A
ppen
dix
A
40
5 Ap
pend
ix A
Lo
catio
n Bo
ardi
ngs
Alig
htin
gs
Tot
al A
ctiv
ity
Tier
Ju
risdi
ctio
n U
nion
Sta
tion
12,
171
9,8
41
22,
012
1
Denv
er
Civi
c Ce
nter
Sta
tion
7
,149
4,5
42
11,
691
1
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/W C
olfa
x Av
e
3,5
41
3
,527
7,06
7
1 De
nver
16
th S
tree
t Mal
l/Wyn
koop
St
3
,372
3,3
21
6,
693
1
Denv
er
Deca
tur /
Fed
eral
Sta
tion
3,3
52
3
,218
6,56
9
1 De
nver
16
th S
tree
t Mal
l/Sto
ut S
t
2,5
56
3
,622
6,17
8
1 De
nver
Au
rora
Met
ro C
ente
r Stn
2,9
35
2
,842
5,77
7
1 Au
rora
Do
wnt
own
Boul
der S
tatio
n
3
,206
2,4
72
5,
678
1
Boul
der
C-47
0/U
nive
rsity
PnR
2,7
36
2
,617
5,35
2
1 U
ninc
orpo
rate
d Do
ugla
s Co
unty
N
ine
Mile
Sta
tion
2
,630
2,4
89
5,
119
1
Auro
ra
Wag
on R
oad
PnR
2,3
64
2
,598
4,96
2
1 W
estm
inst
er
16th
Str
eet M
all/C
alifo
rnia
St
2
,282
2,3
13
4,
595
1
Denv
er
US
36/S
herid
an S
tatio
n
2
,195
2,2
08
4,
403
1
Wes
tmin
ster
I-2
5/Br
oadw
ay S
tatio
n
2,1
81
2
,097
4,27
8
1 De
nver
16
th S
tree
t Mal
l/Law
renc
e St
1,8
75
2
,293
4,16
8
1 De
nver
16
th S
tree
t Mal
l/Cha
mpa
St
1
,954
2,0
31
3,
986
1
Denv
er
US
36/B
room
field
Sta
tion
1,8
48
1
,916
3,76
4
1 Br
oom
field
Br
oadw
ay/E
uclid
Ave
1,9
46
1
,786
3,73
2
1 Bo
ulde
r 16
th S
tree
t Mal
l/Lar
imer
St
1
,684
1,7
45
3,
429
1
Denv
er
16th
Str
eet M
all/T
rem
ont P
l
1,7
64
1
,637
3,40
1
1 De
nver
De
nver
Airp
ort S
tatio
n
1
,546
1,8
48
3,
394
1
Denv
er
16th
Str
eet M
all/C
ourt
Pl
1
,877
1,5
09
3,
386
1
Denv
er
16th
Str
eet M
all/W
elto
n St
1,8
95
1
,381
3,27
6
1 De
nver
16
th S
tree
t Mal
l/Cur
tis S
t
1,4
48
1
,713
3,16
1
1 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Hava
na S
t
1,5
03
1
,509
3,01
2
1 Au
rora
16
th S
tree
t Mal
l/Gle
narm
Pl
1
,454
1,4
03
2,
857
1
Denv
er
Thor
nton
PnR
1,3
08
1
,544
2,85
2
1 Th
ornt
on
S Fe
dera
l Blv
d/W
Eva
ns A
ve
1
,445
1,3
95
2,
840
1
Denv
er
16th
Str
eet M
all/W
azee
St
1
,244
1,5
14
2,
759
1
Denv
er
US
36/T
able
Mes
a St
atio
n
1,3
59
1
,316
2,67
5
1 U
ninc
orpo
rate
d Bo
ulde
r Co
unty
16
th S
tree
t Mal
l/Ara
paho
e St
1,3
26
1
,195
2,52
2
1 De
nver
Co
lora
do S
tatio
n
1,1
82
1
,195
2,37
7
1 De
nver
17
th S
t/La
wre
nce
St
1
,433
9
41
2,
373
1
Denv
er
16th
Str
eet M
all/M
arke
t St
1
,123
1,2
19
2,
342
1
Denv
er
38
41
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
Peor
ia S
tatio
n
1,2
11
1
,104
2,31
5
1 Au
rora
Co
lfax
Ave/
Jose
phin
e St
1,1
30
1
,100
2,23
0
1 De
nver
U
S 36
/McC
aslin
Sta
tion
1,0
52
1
,116
2,16
8
1 Su
perio
r 40
th A
ve/A
irpor
t Blv
d-Ga
tew
ay P
ark
Stn
1
,109
1,0
51
2,
159
1
Auro
ra
Colfa
x Av
e/Do
wni
ng S
t
1,0
09
1
,103
2,11
2
1 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Colo
rado
Blv
d
1,0
31
1
,054
2,08
4
1 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Peor
ia S
t
9
93
908
1,90
2
1 Au
rora
En
glew
ood
Stat
ion
9
12
875
1,78
7
1 En
glew
ood
8th/
Coffm
an P
nR
910
8
59
1,
770
1
Long
mon
t O
lde
Tow
n Ar
vada
PnR
9
10
846
1,75
6
1 Ar
vada
Br
oadw
ay/B
asel
ine
Rd
748
9
75
1,
723
1
Boul
der
Fede
ral C
ente
r Sta
tion
8
94
824
1,71
8
1 La
kew
ood
Alam
eda
Stat
ion
8
10
906
1,71
6
1 De
nver
Ha
vana
St/
Colfa
x Av
e
8
87
817
1,70
5
1 Au
rora
Co
lfax
Ave/
Yose
mite
St
828
7
43
1,
571
1
Denv
er
16th
Str
eet M
all/C
leve
land
Pl
120
1,4
07
1,
527
1
Denv
er
Sout
hmoo
r Sta
tion
744
7
68
1,
512
1
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/Reg
ent D
r
2
74
1
,152
1,42
6
1 Bo
ulde
r Co
lfax
Ave/
Dayt
on S
t
6
86
719
1,40
6
1 Au
rora
Li
ncol
n St
/13t
h Av
e
1
64
1
,215
1,37
9
2 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Billi
ngs S
t
6
94
632
1,32
5
2 Au
rora
S
Broa
dway
/Tab
le M
esa
Dr
600
7
25
1,
325
2
Boul
der
Broa
dway
/Cle
vela
nd P
l
9
69
340
1,30
9
2 De
nver
U
S 36
/Fla
tiron
Sta
tion
6
44
633
1,27
7
2 Br
oom
field
Co
lfax
Ave/
Mol
ine
St
619
6
55
1,
274
2
Auro
ra
40th
/Col
orad
o St
atio
n
683
5
65
1,
248
2
Denv
er
Colo
rado
Blv
d/Co
lfax
Ave
637
5
94
1,
231
2
Denv
er
Peor
ia S
t/Co
lfax
Ave
608
6
08
1,
216
2
Auro
ra
16th
Str
eet M
all/B
lake
St
894
2
99
1,
193
2
Denv
er
Litt
leto
n Do
wnt
own
Stat
ion
5
83
597
1,18
0
2 Li
ttle
ton
18th
St/
Calif
orni
a St
1,0
30
128
1,15
8
2 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Kram
eria
St
561
5
93
1,
155
2
Denv
er
W C
olfa
x Av
e/Sh
erid
an B
lvd
573
5
72
1,
145
2
Lake
woo
d Br
oadw
ay/C
anyo
n Bl
vd
574
5
50
1,
124
2
Boul
der
Colfa
x Av
e/Hi
gh S
t
5
99
524
1,12
3
2 De
nver
19
th S
t/St
out S
t
31
1,0
87
1,
118
2
Denv
er
Colo
rado
Ave
/18t
h St
6
14
502
1,11
5
2 Bo
ulde
r Al
amed
a Av
e/S
Colo
rado
Blv
d
5
51
531
1,08
2
2 De
nver
Co
lora
do A
ve/3
0th
St
719
3
57
1,
076
2
Boul
der
60th
Ave
/Dah
lia S
t
5
46
500
1,04
6
2 Co
mm
erce
City
39
42
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
S Fe
dera
l Blv
d/W
Ala
med
a Av
e
5
83
456
1,03
9
2 De
nver
S
Allis
on P
kwy/
W V
irgin
ia A
ve
505
5
26
1,
031
2
Lake
woo
d W
Col
fax
Ave/
Lipa
n St
8
07
175
98
2
2 De
nver
10
6th/
Mel
ody
Tran
sfer
Cen
ter
510
4
71
982
2
Nor
thgl
enn
Broa
dway
/W 1
3th
Ave
803
1
56
960
2
Denv
er
Colfa
x Av
e/Q
uebe
c St
4
51
476
92
6
2 De
nver
Ar
apah
oe a
t Vill
age
Cent
er S
tatio
n
469
4
50
919
2
Gree
nwoo
d Vi
llage
15
th S
t/La
rimer
St
472
4
37
908
2
Denv
er
Colo
rado
Ave
/Fol
som
St
529
3
75
904
2
Boul
der
Broa
dway
/20t
h St
6
71
217
88
9
2 Bo
ulde
r Li
ttle
ton
/ Min
eral
Sta
tion
4
66
388
85
4
2 Li
ttle
ton
Base
line
Rd/B
road
way
5
33
319
85
2
2 Bo
ulde
r W
Col
fax
Ave/
Wad
swor
th B
lvd
477
3
55
832
2
Lake
woo
d La
faye
tte
PnR
4
28
387
81
5
2 La
faye
tte
17th
St/
Cham
pa S
t
6
50
165
81
5
2 De
nver
St
out S
t/18
th S
t
5
45
261
80
5
2 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Tam
arac
St
391
4
13
804
2
Denv
er
S Fe
dera
l Blv
d/W
Lou
isian
a Av
e
4
06
396
80
2
2 De
nver
15
th S
t/St
out S
t
4
16
381
79
7
2 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Mon
aco
Pkw
y
4
50
337
78
7
2 De
nver
11
th S
t/La
rimer
St
425
3
62
787
2
Denv
er
W A
lam
eda
Ave/
S Fe
dera
l Blv
d
4
16
368
78
4
2 De
nver
Gr
eenb
riar B
lvd/
Gilla
spie
Dr
402
3
74
776
2
Boul
der
Broa
dway
/Wal
nut S
t
3
91
376
76
7
2 Bo
ulde
r Co
lora
do A
ve/3
3rd
St
452
3
12
764
2
Boul
der
Colfa
x St
atio
n
3
47
406
75
3
2 Au
rora
U
S 36
/Chu
rch
Ranc
h St
atio
n
3
56
383
73
9
2 W
estm
inst
er
Wad
swor
th B
lvd/
W 1
3th
Ave
397
3
27
724
2
Lake
woo
d W
Col
fax
Ave/
Mar
ipos
a St
1
69
548
71
7
2 De
nver
15
th S
t/Ca
lifor
nia
St
9
7
607
70
4
2 De
nver
Li
ncol
n St
/7th
Ave
2
59
431
69
0
2 De
nver
S
Hava
na S
t/M
ississ
ippi
Ave
3
41
325
66
6
2 Au
rora
S
Lew
iston
Way
/S P
arke
r Rd
335
3
26
661
2
Auro
ra
Sout
hwes
t Pla
za
330
3
29
658
2
Uni
ncor
pora
ted
Jeffe
rson
Co
unty
Br
oadw
ay/G
lena
rm P
l
2
6
53
655
2
Denv
er
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 1
0th
Ave
334
3
07
641
2
Denv
er
Calif
orni
a St
/17t
h St
1
36
494
63
0
2 De
nver
Sh
erid
an B
lvd/
W C
olfa
x Av
e
3
14
313
62
6
2 La
kew
ood
Wad
swor
th B
lvd/
W C
olfa
x Av
e
3
06
312
61
8
2 La
kew
ood
40
43
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
17th
St/
Wel
ton
St
518
97
61
5
2 De
nver
15
th S
t/Ch
ampa
St
415
1
89
604
2
Denv
er
W E
vans
Ave
/S C
lay
St
345
2
49
594
2
Denv
er
S Br
oadw
ay/D
artm
outh
Ave
3
09
285
59
4
2 Bo
ulde
r 17
th S
t/Ca
lifor
nia
St
390
2
03
593
2
Denv
er
Evan
s Sta
tion
2
97
290
58
7
2 De
nver
Br
oadw
ay/W
9th
Ave
3
22
248
57
1
2 De
nver
Br
oadw
ay/S
pruc
e St
2
58
309
56
7
2 Bo
ulde
r Pe
oria
St/
6th
Ave
327
2
39
566
2
Auro
ra
S Ha
vana
St/
Iliff
Ave
281
2
79
560
2
Auro
ra
Aura
ria P
kwy/
9th
St
297
2
58
554
2
Denv
er
Oak
Sta
tion
2
95
247
54
2
2 La
kew
ood
Tabl
e M
esa
Dr/S
Bro
adw
ay
296
2
34
530
2
Boul
der
Colfa
x Av
e/Ch
ambe
rs R
d
2
74
253
52
7
2 Au
rora
Co
lfax
Ave/
Sher
man
St
301
2
25
526
2
Denv
er
36th
Ave
/Syr
acus
e St
2
78
243
52
1
2 De
nver
M
onac
o Pk
wy/
Colfa
x Av
e
2
28
289
51
7
2 De
nver
En
glew
ood
Pkw
y/S
Acom
a St
2
91
224
51
5
2 En
glew
ood
Law
renc
e St
/16t
h St
reet
Mal
l
3
12
201
51
4
2 De
nver
Lo
uisia
na /
Pear
l Sta
tion
2
17
295
51
2
2 De
nver
S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W M
ississ
ippi
Ave
2
30
280
51
1
2 De
nver
15
th S
t/Cl
evel
and
Pl
8
0
429
51
0
2 De
nver
S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W F
lorid
a Av
e
2
70
240
50
9
2 De
nver
28
th S
t/Hw
y 11
9
251
2
52
503
2
Boul
der
Sabl
e Bl
vd/C
olfa
x Av
e
1
76
316
49
2
2 Au
rora
1s
t Ave
/Fill
mor
e Pl
aza
240
2
50
490
2
Denv
er
S Pe
oria
St/
Miss
issip
pi A
ve
258
2
26
484
2
Auro
ra
Broa
dway
/Col
lege
Ave
2
40
241
48
1
2 Bo
ulde
r Q
uebe
c St
/Col
fax
Ave
242
2
38
480
2
Denv
er
W C
olfa
x Av
e/Pi
erce
St
222
2
54
476
2
Lake
woo
d 15
th S
t/W
ynko
op S
t
1
95
279
47
3
2 De
nver
Bo
ulde
r Jun
ctio
n at
Dep
ot S
quar
e St
atio
n
225
2
47
472
2
Boul
der
18th
St/
Wel
ton
St
465
4
46
9
2 De
nver
W
Eva
ns A
ve/S
Fed
eral
Blv
d
2
62
205
46
7
2 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Gran
t St
101
3
65
466
2
Denv
er
Park
Ave
Wes
t/W
ewat
ta S
t
33
4
29
462
2
Denv
er
Sher
idan
Sta
tion
231
2
31
462
2
Lake
woo
d
High
land
s Ran
ch T
own
Cent
er P
nR
246
2
15
462
2
Uni
ncor
pora
ted
Doug
las
Coun
ty
41
44
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
Mar
ket S
t/16
th S
tree
t Mal
l
1
56
305
46
2
2 De
nver
15
th S
t/De
lgan
y St
1
95
265
46
0
2 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Sabl
e Bl
vd
324
1
36
460
2
Auro
ra
Appl
ewoo
d Vi
llage
2
31
222
45
2
2 W
heat
Rid
ge
Tabl
e M
esa
Dr/3
9th
St
285
1
67
451
2
Boul
der
W C
olfa
x Av
e/Te
ller S
t
2
00
245
44
5
2 La
kew
ood
18th
St/
Eucl
id A
ve
8
437
44
5
2 Bo
ulde
r Sa
ble
Blvd
/6th
Ave
2
33
211
44
4
2 Au
rora
S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W E
xpos
ition
Ave
2
27
213
44
0
2 De
nver
Cu
rtis
St/1
6th
Stre
et M
all
432
7
43
9
2 De
nver
15
th S
t/Cu
rtis
St
6
2
368
43
0
2 De
nver
9t
h Av
e/Cl
erm
ont S
t
2
40
189
42
9
2 De
nver
19
th S
t/M
arke
t St
1
9
407
42
6
2 De
nver
S
Elat
i St/
Engl
ewoo
d Pk
wy
193
2
31
424
2
Engl
ewoo
d 15
th S
t/Gl
enar
m P
l
1
00
320
42
0
2 De
nver
S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W Je
wel
l Ave
1
74
238
41
3
2 De
nver
17
th S
t/St
out S
t
2
56
151
40
7
2 De
nver
Ili
ff Av
e/S
Hava
na S
t
2
03
202
40
5
2 Au
rora
Co
lfax
Ave/
Glen
coe
St
196
2
03
398
2
Denv
er
S Fe
dera
l Blv
d/W
Ken
tuck
y Av
e
1
85
213
39
8
2 De
nver
Co
lora
do B
lvd/
11th
Ave
2
05
191
39
6
2 De
nver
30
th/D
owni
ng S
tatio
n
2
02
194
39
5
2 De
nver
W
al-M
art/
Salid
a St
& T
ower
Rd
215
1
79
394
2
Auro
ra
S U
lster
St/
Tuft
s Ave
2
08
184
39
2
2 De
nver
27
th W
ay/B
road
way
2
38
153
39
1
2 Bo
ulde
r Li
ncol
n St
/17t
h Av
e
2
96
9
3
390
2
Denv
er
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 5
0th
Ave
189
1
99
388
2
Denv
er
Wew
atta
St/
17th
St
186
2
02
387
2
Denv
er
Arap
ahoe
Ave
/30t
h St
1
82
202
38
4
2 Bo
ulde
r S
Mon
aco
Pkw
y/Ha
mpd
en A
ve
122
2
60
382
2
Denv
er
S Bu
ckle
y Rd
/Ilif
f Ave
2
27
152
37
9
2 Au
rora
Pe
oria
St/
Del M
ar C
ir N
1
32
243
37
5
2 Au
rora
Co
lora
do A
ve/2
8th
St
211
1
64
375
2
Boul
der
Broa
dway
/Alp
ine
Ave
179
1
95
374
2
Boul
der
Colfa
x Av
e/Pe
arl S
t
1
78
195
37
3
2 De
nver
S
Hava
na S
t/Al
amed
a Av
e
2
02
165
36
7
2 De
nver
W
ard
Road
PnR
1
91
176
36
7
2 W
heat
Rid
ge
Linc
oln
Stat
ion
1
80
184
36
4
2 U
ninc
orpo
rate
d Do
ugla
s Co
unty
Br
oadw
ay/Y
arm
outh
Ave
1
48
214
36
2
2 Bo
ulde
r
42
45
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
Uni
vers
ity o
f Den
ver S
tatio
n
177
1
83
361
2
Denv
er
W C
olfa
x Av
e/Ke
ndal
l St
133
2
27
360
2
Lake
woo
d W
Col
fax
Ave/
Kipl
ing
St
150
2
08
358
2
Lake
woo
d Do
wni
ng S
t/Co
lfax
Ave
253
1
04
357
2
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/Uni
vers
ity A
ve
152
2
02
354
2
Boul
der
Waz
ee S
t/16
th S
tree
t Mal
l
93
2
59
353
2
Denv
er
Park
Rid
ge A
ve/M
ain
St
171
1
81
352
2
Long
mon
t Br
oadw
ay/P
leas
ant S
t
1
78
173
35
1
2 Bo
ulde
r Co
lfax/
Fede
ral T
rans
fer C
ente
r
1
78
173
35
0
2 De
nver
S
Broa
dway
/W A
lam
eda
Ave
9
2
257
34
8
2 De
nver
17
th P
l/Aur
ora
Ct
171
1
77
348
2
Auro
ra
Peco
s St/
W 7
2nd
Ave
165
1
83
348
2
Uni
ncor
pora
ted
Adam
s Co
unty
Tr
emon
t Pl/1
6th
Stre
et M
all
3
5
312
34
7
2 De
nver
S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W Y
ale
Ave
193
1
52
345
2
Denv
er
Linc
oln
St/9
th A
ve
215
1
29
344
2
Denv
er
Hava
na S
t/6t
h Av
e
1
67
176
34
3
2 Au
rora
S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W C
olor
ado
Ave
177
1
64
341
2
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/Nor
th S
t
1
91
148
33
9
2 Bo
ulde
r Br
oadw
ay/W
1st
Ave
74
2
64
338
2
Denv
er
Eucl
id A
ve/1
8th
St
179
1
57
335
2
Boul
der
W C
olfa
x Av
e/La
mar
St
232
1
01
333
2
Lake
woo
d Co
rona
St/
Colfa
x Av
e
1
13
219
33
2
2 De
nver
Br
oadw
ay/S
peer
Blv
d
1
01
229
33
0
2 De
nver
17
th S
t/Cu
rtis
St
175
1
51
326
2
Denv
er
Tabl
e M
esa
Dr/T
antr
a Dr
1
78
148
32
6
2 Bo
ulde
r St
out S
t/16
th S
tree
t Mal
l
81
2
44
325
2
Denv
er
Bann
ock
St/S
peer
Blv
d
2
43
8
2
324
2
Denv
er
W C
olfa
x Av
e/Irv
ing
St
147
1
77
323
2
Denv
er
S Co
lora
do B
lvd/
Miss
issip
pi A
ve
163
1
59
322
2
Denv
er
23rd
Ave
/Mai
n St
1
93
129
32
2
2 Lo
ngm
ont
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 3
8th
Ave
163
1
59
322
2
Denv
er
Loui
siana
Ave
/S F
rank
lin S
t
1
16
204
32
0
2 De
nver
S
Mon
aco
Pkw
y/Ex
posit
ion
Ave
165
1
52
318
2
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/18t
h St
16
3
02
317
2
Denv
er
Miss
issip
pi A
ve/S
Hav
ana
St
184
1
31
316
2
Denv
er
W A
lam
eda
Ave/
S Sh
erid
an B
lvd
154
1
61
315
2
Lake
woo
d 15
th S
t/Tr
emon
t Pl
3
8
276
31
4
2 De
nver
30
th S
t/Ar
apah
oe A
ve
171
1
43
314
2
Boul
der
Cour
t Pl/1
4th
St
4
1
273
31
3
2 De
nver
43
46
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
W H
olde
n Pl
/Fed
eral
Blv
d
1
98
114
31
2
2 De
nver
18
th S
t/Cu
rtis
St
236
75
31
1
2 De
nver
Co
lora
do B
lvd/
Bruc
e Ra
ndol
ph A
ve
156
1
54
310
2
Denv
er
Linc
oln
St/1
st A
ve
230
80
31
0
2 De
nver
M
ontv
iew
Blv
d/Da
yton
St
162
1
47
309
2
Auro
ra
Colfa
x Av
e/U
rsul
a St
89
2
18
307
2
Auro
ra
30th
St/
Colo
rado
Ave
1
34
171
30
6
2 Bo
ulde
r S
Linc
oln
St/A
lam
eda
Ave
211
92
30
3
2 De
nver
Ili
ff Av
e/S
Peor
ia S
t
1
59
144
30
3
2 Au
rora
Le
etsd
ale
Dr/S
For
est S
t
1
41
161
30
2
2 De
nver
S
Sher
idan
Blv
d/W
Ala
med
a Av
e
1
62
140
30
2
2 La
kew
ood
6th
Ave/
Peor
ia S
t
1
88
113
30
1
2 Au
rora
W
ashi
ngto
n St
/88t
h Av
e
177
1
23
299
2
Thor
nton
36
th A
ve/Q
uebe
c St
1
26
167
29
4
2 De
nver
S
Hava
na S
t/Ex
posit
ion
Ave
152
1
41
294
2
Denv
er
12th
Ave
/Was
hing
ton
St
169
1
23
292
2
Denv
er
Linc
oln
- Jor
dan
PnR
136
1
56
292
2
Park
er
S Sh
erid
an B
lvd/
W D
artm
outh
Ave
1
74
117
29
2
2 De
nver
W
Eva
ns A
ve/S
She
ridan
Blv
d
1
34
157
29
1
2 De
nver
W
Col
fax
Ave/
Carr
St
144
1
43
288
2
Lake
woo
d Al
broo
k Dr
/Peo
ria S
t
1
55
131
28
6
2 De
nver
Le
etsd
ale
Dr/S
Mon
aco
Pkw
y
1
24
157
28
1
2 De
nver
Le
etsd
ale
Dr/S
Che
rry
St
132
1
48
280
2
Glen
dale
17
th S
t/Ar
apah
oe S
t
1
35
144
27
9
2 De
nver
30
th S
t/Va
lmon
t Rd
138
1
41
278
2
Boul
der
18th
St/
Stou
t St
8
7
188
27
6
2 De
nver
Ch
ampa
St/
18th
St
3
7
237
27
4
2 De
nver
W
Ala
med
a Av
e/S
Yum
a St
1
52
120
27
2
2 De
nver
S
Allis
on P
kwy/
W A
lam
eda
Ave
118
1
54
272
2
Lake
woo
d Fe
dera
l Blv
d/W
29t
h Av
e
1
33
138
27
1
2 De
nver
M
LK B
lvd/
Colo
rado
Blv
d
1
19
150
27
0
3 De
nver
19
th S
t/Cu
rtis
St
5
3
215
26
9
3 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
King
ston
St
124
1
44
268
3
Auro
ra
Broa
dway
/W 1
1th
Ave
131
1
36
267
3
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/27t
h W
ay
114
1
53
266
3
Boul
der
Base
line
Rd/3
0th
St
9
8
168
26
6
3 Bo
ulde
r Co
lfax
Ave/
Vaug
hn S
t
1
71
9
4
266
3
Auro
ra
Colfa
x Av
e/Fr
ankl
in S
t
88
1
77
266
3
Denv
er
Cham
pa S
t/15
th S
t
1
39
127
26
6
3 De
nver
Ch
ambe
rs R
d/13
th A
ve
128
1
35
264
3
Auro
ra
44
47
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
Fron
t Ran
ge A
ve/B
road
way
1
65
9
6
261
3
Boul
der
18th
St/
Law
renc
e St
1
31
129
26
0
3 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Beel
er S
t
1
05
154
25
9
3 Au
rora
W
adsw
orth
Blv
d/W
38t
h Av
e
1
23
136
25
9
3 W
heat
Rid
ge
S Q
uebe
c St
/Lee
tsda
le D
r
1
05
154
25
9
3 De
nver
S
Colo
rado
Blv
d/Fl
orid
a Av
e
1
23
135
25
8
3 De
nver
19
th S
t/La
wre
nce
St
9
5
162
25
7
3 De
nver
28
th S
t/Iri
s Ave
1
06
151
25
7
3 Bo
ulde
r Ba
nnoc
k St
/W 7
th A
ve
9
0
166
25
7
3 De
nver
S
Colo
rado
Blv
d/O
hio
Ave
130
1
27
257
3
Denv
er
Colfa
x Av
e/Va
lent
ia S
t
1
29
127
25
6
3 De
nver
M
ississ
ippi
Ave
/S P
eoria
St
138
1
17
255
3
Auro
ra
S Br
oadw
ay/W
Litt
leto
n Bl
vd
9
3
162
25
5
3 Li
ttle
ton
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 7
2nd
Ave
149
1
06
255
3
Wes
tmin
ster
W
38t
h Av
e/Fe
dera
l Blv
d
1
22
133
25
4
3 De
nver
S Pa
rker
Rd/
S Q
uebe
c St
1
09
145
25
4
3 U
ninc
orpo
rate
d Ar
apah
oe
Coun
ty
Colfa
x Av
e/Ga
rfie
ld S
t
1
30
123
25
3
3 De
nver
Br
ight
on B
lvd/
29th
St
113
1
39
252
3
Denv
er
Park
Mea
dow
s Ped
estr
ian
Brid
ge
138
1
13
251
3
Lone
Tre
e M
ain
St/3
rd A
ve
122
1
29
251
3
Long
mon
t W
Exp
ositi
on A
ve/S
Fed
eral
Blv
d
1
19
129
24
8
3 De
nver
S
Sher
idan
Blv
d/W
Eva
ns A
ve
129
1
17
246
3
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/Vio
let A
ve
134
1
11
245
3
Boul
der
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 1
7th
Ave
122
1
21
243
3
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/Law
renc
e St
1
34
107
24
1
3 De
nver
W
14t
h Av
e/Irv
ing
St
108
1
32
240
3
Denv
er
Wel
ton
St/1
6th
Stre
et M
all
1
2
227
23
9
3 De
nver
Be
llevi
ew S
tatio
n
109
1
30
239
3
Denv
er
Hava
na S
t/1s
t Ave
1
15
123
23
8
3 Au
rora
Fr
ont R
ange
Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge
129
1
09
238
3
Wes
tmin
ster
Pa
rker
PnR
1
19
119
23
8
3 Pa
rker
U
S 85
/Brid
ge S
t PnR
1
16
121
23
7
3 Br
ight
on
Cent
ral P
ark
Blvd
/54t
h Av
e
1
31
106
23
7
3 De
nver
Pe
oria
St/
47th
Ave
1
78
5
8
236
3
Denv
er
13th
St/
Wel
ton
St
123
1
12
235
3
Denv
er
Wad
swor
th/H
ampd
en P
nR
122
1
13
234
3
Uni
ncor
pora
ted
Jeffe
rson
Co
unty
30
th S
t/Ca
nyon
Blv
d
1
15
119
23
4
3 Bo
ulde
r Le
etsd
ale
Dr/S
One
ida
St
106
1
27
233
3
Denv
er
45
48
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
18th
St/
Larim
er S
t
50
1
83
233
3
Denv
er
Colo
rado
Blv
d/29
th A
ve
109
1
23
232
3
Denv
er
Trem
ont P
l/Bro
adw
ay
2
0
212
23
1
3 De
nver
S
Hava
na S
t/Da
rtm
outh
Ave
1
19
112
23
1
3 De
nver
28
th S
t/Ca
nyon
Blv
d
1
29
100
23
0
3 Bo
ulde
r S
Peor
ia S
t/Je
wel
l Ave
1
24
105
22
9
3 Au
rora
U
S 85
/72n
d Av
e Pn
R
1
43
8
6
229
3
Com
mer
ce C
ity
Ham
pden
Ave
/S T
amar
ac D
r
1
14
115
22
9
3 De
nver
Fe
dera
l Blv
d/W
26t
h Av
e
79
1
50
228
3
Denv
er
28th
St/
Wal
nut S
t
94
1
34
228
3
Boul
der
Colfa
x Av
e/Cl
arks
on S
t
1
27
100
22
7
3 De
nver
88
th A
ve/W
ashi
ngto
n St
1
13
112
22
5
3 Th
ornt
on
Colfa
x Av
e/Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia S
t
83
1
41
224
3
Denv
er
Iliff
Ave/
S Bl
ackh
awk
St
117
1
07
224
3
Auro
ra
W 2
6th
Ave/
Fede
ral B
lvd
120
1
04
223
3
Denv
er
6th
Ave/
Hava
na S
t
1
11
113
22
3
3 Au
rora
Co
lora
do B
lvd/
MLK
Blv
d
1
04
118
22
2
3 De
nver
W
9th
Ave
/Vra
in S
t
1
19
102
22
2
3 De
nver
S
Broa
dway
/W B
ayau
d Av
e
60
1
61
221
3
Denv
er
Jose
phin
e St
/Col
fax
Ave
140
81
22
1
3 De
nver
Co
lora
do A
ve/2
6th
St
1
7
204
22
1
3 Bo
ulde
r Co
lfax
Ave/
Syra
cuse
St
102
1
19
221
3
Denv
er
W C
olfa
x Av
e/Pe
rry
St
111
1
10
221
3
Denv
er
Base
line
Rd/M
ohaw
k Dr
1
17
103
22
1
3 Bo
ulde
r 1s
t Ave
/Uni
vers
ity B
lvd
100
1
20
220
3
Denv
er
Mai
n St
/17t
h Av
e
105
1
15
220
3
Long
mon
t S
Buck
ley
Rd/Q
uinc
y Av
e
99
1
21
219
3
Auro
ra
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 2
7th
Ave
159
59
21
8
3 De
nver
S
Wad
swor
th B
lvd/
W Je
wel
l Ave
1
29
8
8
217
3
Lake
woo
d Co
lora
do B
lvd/
8th
Ave
100
1
16
217
3
Denv
er
S Sa
ble
Blvd
/Miss
issip
pi A
ve
7
8
139
21
7
3 Au
rora
Co
lfax
Ave/
Park
Ave
1
33
8
3
216
3
Denv
er
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 1
st A
ve
105
1
12
216
3
Denv
er
Sher
idan
Blv
d/W
5th
Ave
1
10
105
21
5
3 La
kew
ood
31st
St/
Ring
sby
Ct
111
1
04
215
3
Denv
er
47th
Ave
/Par
is St
1
14
101
21
5
3 De
nver
S
Race
St/
Davi
es P
l
1
09
104
21
4
3 Ce
nten
nial
Pe
oria
St/
Albr
ook
Dr
5
5
158
21
3
3 De
nver
19
th S
t/Ar
apah
oe S
t
5
2
08
213
3
Denv
er
S Ha
vana
St/
Idah
o Pl
1
00
113
21
3
3 Au
rora
46
49
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
Linc
oln
St/1
1th
Ave
106
1
06
212
3
Denv
er
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 4
4th
Ave
105
1
07
212
3
Denv
er
16th
Ave
/Aur
ora
Ct
108
1
03
212
3
Auro
ra
W 5
0th
Ave/
Fede
ral B
lvd
107
1
03
210
3
Denv
er
Miss
issip
pi A
ve/S
Col
orad
o Bl
vd
8
9
120
21
0
3 De
nver
12
th A
ve/C
oron
a St
50
1
59
209
3
Denv
er
Sher
idan
Blv
d/W
38t
h Av
e
1
05
104
20
9
3 W
heat
Rid
ge
S Pe
oria
St/
Iliff
Ave
115
92
20
7
3 Au
rora
Au
rora
Ct/
16th
Ave
92
1
15
207
3
Auro
ra
21st
St/
Cham
pa S
t
1
16
9
0
206
3
Denv
er
Deca
tur S
t/W
Hol
den
Pl
126
79
20
5
3 De
nver
Ha
vana
St/
11th
Ave
99
1
05
205
3
Auro
ra
W 1
0th
Ave/
Fede
ral B
lvd
9
5
110
20
5
3 De
nver
Th
omas
Jeffe
rson
Hig
h Sc
hool
99
1
06
204
3
Denv
er
Peor
ia S
t/45
th A
ve
9
3
111
20
4
3 De
nver
W
Ala
med
a Av
e/S
Tejo
n St
1
04
100
20
4
3 De
nver
S
Linc
oln
St/B
ayau
d Av
e
1
55
4
9
204
3
Denv
er
S Pa
rker
Rd/
Miss
issip
pi A
ve
9
7
105
20
3
3 De
nver
Co
lora
do B
lvd/
40th
Ave
1
79
2
4
203
3
Denv
er
Arap
ahoe
Ave
/55t
h St
1
07
9
5
202
3
Boul
der
17th
Ave
/Esp
lana
de
115
87
20
2
3 De
nver
S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W C
orne
ll Av
e
1
12
9
0
202
3
Denv
er
12th
Ave
/Dow
ning
St
150
50
20
1
3 De
nver
Pe
oria
St/
39th
Ave
97
1
03
200
3
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/Por
tland
Pl
8
6
114
20
0
3 Bo
ulde
r W
Col
fax
Ave/
Colo
rado
Mill
s
90
1
09
199
3
Lake
woo
d Br
oadw
ay/F
ores
t Ave
91
1
08
199
3
Boul
der
Broa
dway
/Ara
paho
e Av
e
1
65
3
4
199
3
Boul
der
Evan
s Ave
/S M
onac
o Pk
wy
112
86
19
8
3 De
nver
S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W V
irgin
ia A
ve
9
9
100
19
8
3 De
nver
St
eele
St/
Ellsw
orth
Ave
81
1
16
198
3
Denv
er
Bruc
e Ra
ndol
ph A
ve/C
olor
ado
Blvd
1
06
9
1
197
3
Denv
er
18th
St/
Glen
arm
Pl
170
27
19
7
3 De
nver
Co
mm
unity
Col
lege
of A
uror
a
1
04
9
1
195
3
Auro
ra
W 3
8th
Ave/
Sher
idan
Blv
d
95
1
00
195
3
Whe
at R
idge
Co
lfax
Ave/
Jam
aica
St
9
2
103
19
5
3 Au
rora
W
adsw
orth
Blv
d/W
52n
d Av
e
89
1
06
194
3
Arva
da
Evan
s Ave
/S U
nive
rsity
Blv
d
91
1
03
194
3
Denv
er
Mon
tvie
w B
lvd/
Clin
ton
St
101
93
19
4
3 Au
rora
Sa
ble
Blvd
/2nd
Ave
98
96
19
4
3 Au
rora
47
50
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
Dow
ning
St/
31st
Ave
80
1
13
194
3
Denv
er
Mill
er D
r/Pi
ke R
d
102
91
19
3
3 Lo
ngm
ont
Smok
y Hi
ll - P
icad
illy
PnR
100
93
19
3
3 Ce
nten
nial
M
arke
t St/
14th
St
8
3
109
19
2
3 De
nver
Pe
oria
St/
Mon
tvie
w B
lvd
9
6
9
5
192
3
Auro
ra
Colfa
x Av
e/W
illow
St
7
8
113
19
1
3 De
nver
Sa
lida
Ct/W
alde
n St
77
1
14
191
3
Auro
ra
York
St/
Colfa
x Av
e
98
92
19
0
3 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Fillm
ore
St
7
1
120
19
0
3 De
nver
20
th S
t/La
rimer
St
154
36
18
9
3 De
nver
M
LK B
lvd/
Dahl
ia S
t
95
94
18
9
3 De
nver
S
Sher
idan
Blv
d/W
Flo
rida
Ave
9
3
9
6
189
3
Lake
woo
d Br
oadw
ay/C
urtis
St
102
87
18
9
3 De
nver
Ha
mpd
en A
ve/S
Mon
aco
Pkw
y
1
63
2
5
188
3
Denv
er
S Ha
vana
St/
Flor
ida
Ave
8
6
102
18
8
3 Au
rora
Al
amed
a Av
e/S
Cham
bers
Rd
8
8
9
9
187
3
Auro
ra
Broa
dway
/Mar
ine
St
4
0
147
18
7
3 Bo
ulde
r Ch
ambe
rs R
d/Co
lfax
Ave
102
85
18
7
3 Au
rora
S
Hava
na S
t/Vi
rgin
ia A
ve
9
1
9
5
186
3
Denv
er
10th
St/
Was
hing
ton
Ave
1
00
8
4
185
3
Gold
en
Colfa
x Av
e/N
ome
St
6
7
117
18
5
3 Au
rora
W
ashi
ngto
n St
/Syl
via
Dr
100
84
18
4
3 N
orth
glen
n 20
th S
t/Ch
estn
ut S
t
96
87
18
3
3 De
nver
M
ain
St/2
1st A
ve
113
70
18
3
3 Lo
ngm
ont
W C
olfa
x Av
e/W
inon
a Ct
89
93
18
3
3 De
nver
Lo
wry
Blv
d/Al
ton
Way
90
92
18
3
3 Au
rora
S
Buck
ley
Rd/M
exic
o Av
e
87
95
18
2
3 Au
rora
Co
lora
do B
lvd/
9th
Ave
8
9
9
3
182
3
Denv
er
Colo
rado
Blv
d/23
rd A
ve
8
8
9
4
182
3
Denv
er
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 1
2th
Ave
8
3
9
9
182
3
Denv
er
S Co
lora
do B
lvd/
Loui
siana
Ave
74
1
08
182
3
Denv
er
S Pe
oria
St/
Ford
Ave
84
97
18
1
3 Au
rora
Le
etsd
ale
Dr/S
Que
bec
St
128
52
18
1
3 De
nver
S
Hava
na S
t/Ya
le A
ve
8
4
9
7
180
3
Denv
er
Sout
h Fe
dera
l Blv
d/W
est A
lam
eda
Ave
1
2
167
18
0
3 De
nver
S Pa
rker
Rd/
Iliff
Ave
9
1
8
9
180
3
Uni
ncor
pora
ted
Arap
ahoe
Co
unty
Co
lfax
Ave/
Airp
ort B
lvd
7
9
101
17
9
3 Au
rora
W
63r
d Av
e/W
right
St
7
9
100
17
9
3 Ar
vada
Br
oadw
ay/4
th A
ve
5
1
128
17
9
3 De
nver
48
51
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
12th
Ave
/Rac
e St
91
87
17
9
3 De
nver
S
Park
er R
d/S
Peor
ia S
t
57
1
21
179
3
Auro
ra
W Je
wel
l Ave
/S W
adsw
orth
Blv
d
96
83
17
8
3 La
kew
ood
W C
olfa
x Av
e/14
th S
t
1
71
6
177
3
Denv
er
12th
Ave
/Pen
nsyl
vani
a St
87
90
17
6
3 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Emer
son
St
7
9
9
7
176
3
Denv
er
Wad
swor
th B
lvd/
W 4
4th
Ave
8
6
9
0
176
3
Whe
at R
idge
17
th A
ve/B
road
way
1
43
3
2
175
3
Denv
er
31st
Ave
/Dow
ning
St
9
0
8
4
175
3
Denv
er
S W
adsw
orth
Blv
d/W
Miss
issip
pi A
ve
7
1
102
17
4
3 La
kew
ood
S Ha
vana
St/
Kent
ucky
Ave
79
95
17
3
3 Au
rora
Ar
apah
oe A
ve/2
8th
St
6
8
104
17
3
3 Bo
ulde
r
Flor
ida
Ave/
S Al
ton
St
8
6
8
7
172
3
Uni
ncor
pora
ted
Arap
ahoe
Co
unty
Sh
erid
an B
lvd/
W 7
2nd
Ave
9
2
8
0
172
3
Wes
tmin
ster
Co
lora
do B
lvd/
17th
Ave
85
87
17
2
3 De
nver
W
44t
h Av
e/Fe
dera
l Blv
d
86
86
17
2
3 De
nver
Iliff
Ave/
S Da
yton
Way
87
84
17
1
3 U
ninc
orpo
rate
d Ar
apah
oe
Coun
ty
Lipa
n St
/W 3
8th
Ave
8
5
8
6
171
3
Denv
er
40th
Ave
/Col
orad
o Bl
vd
9
162
17
1
3 De
nver
S
Cham
bers
Rd/
Miss
issip
pi A
ve
9
1
8
0
171
3
Auro
ra
W C
olfa
x Av
e/Ea
ton
St
7
8
9
3
171
3
Lake
woo
d S
Mon
aco
Pkw
y/Ili
ff Av
e
90
80
17
1
3 De
nver
W
Col
gate
Pl/S
She
ridan
Blv
d
64
1
07
171
3
Denv
er
W C
olfa
x Av
e/El
ati S
t
34
1
36
170
3
Denv
er
Cany
on B
lvd/
17th
St
5
4
117
17
0
3 Bo
ulde
r 33
rd A
ve/P
eoria
St
1
4
156
17
0
3 Au
rora
S
Buck
ley
Rd/K
entu
cky
Ave
8
3
8
7
170
3
Auro
ra
Sher
idan
Blv
d/W
20t
h Av
e
1
02
6
8
170
3
Edge
wat
er
Park
Ave
W/D
elga
ny S
t
1
38
3
1
169
3
Denv
er
Colo
rado
Blv
d/M
ontv
iew
Blv
d
83
85
16
8
3 De
nver
N
eder
land
PnR
82
86
16
8
3 N
eder
land
S
Mon
aco
Pkw
y/Ke
ntuc
ky A
ve
9
6
7
1
167
3
Denv
er
Arap
ahoe
Com
mun
ity C
olle
ge
8
9
7
8
167
3
Litt
leto
n S
Vanc
e St
/W V
irgin
ia A
ve
6
8
9
9
167
3
Lake
woo
d Do
wni
ng S
t/Br
uce
Rand
olph
Ave
1
02
6
4
165
3
Denv
er
Alam
eda
Ave/
S Ha
rriso
n St
68
96
16
5
3 De
nver
La
rimer
St/
20th
St
7
4
9
0
164
3
Denv
er
Colfa
x Av
e/Sa
int P
aul S
t
97
66
16
4
3 De
nver
49
52
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
12th
Ave
/Eliz
abet
h St
83
81
16
4
3 De
nver
W
Miss
issip
pi A
ve/S
Rar
itan
St
8
3
8
1
164
3
Denv
er
Wes
tmin
ster
Sta
tion
89
74
16
3
3 W
estm
inst
er
S Q
uebe
c St
/S Q
uebe
c W
ay
8
8
7
6
163
3
Denv
er
Colfa
x Av
e/De
troi
t St
7
6
8
7
163
3
Denv
er
W 7
2nd
Ave/
Fede
ral B
lvd
8
0
8
3
163
3
Wes
tmin
ster
Sa
nta
Fe D
r/W
13t
h Av
e
1
02
6
0
163
3
Denv
er
Arap
ahoe
Ave
/48t
h St
79
83
16
2
3 Bo
ulde
r Br
oadw
ay/W
5th
Ave
48
1
14
162
3
Denv
er
Sout
hlan
ds
8
2
8
0
162
3
Auro
ra
MLK
Blv
d/Po
ntia
c St
80
82
16
2
3 De
nver
Co
lfax
Ave/
Scra
nton
St
100
62
16
2
3 Au
rora
S
Mon
aco
Pkw
y/Ev
ans A
ve
8
3
7
8
162
3
Denv
er
Linc
oln
St/4
th A
ve
116
44
16
1
3 De
nver
M
oorh
ead
Ave/
Tabl
e M
esa
Dr
9
4
6
6
160
3
Boul
der
Wad
swor
th B
lvd/
W 8
8th
Ave
8
3
7
6
159
3
Arva
da
Alam
eda
Ave/
S M
onac
o Pk
wy
8
3
7
5
158
3
Denv
er
Broa
dway
/Ray
leig
h Rd
77
80
15
8
3 Bo
ulde
r Sm
ith R
d/Ke
arne
y St
82
76
15
8
3 De
nver
W
Col
fax
Ave/
Sim
ms S
t
84
74
15
8
3 La
kew
ood
Ham
pden
Ave
/S F
lore
nce
St
7
9
7
8
157
3
Denv
er
S Sh
erid
an B
lvd/
W K
entu
cky
Ave
8
5
7
2
157
3
Lake
woo
d W
ashi
ngto
n St
/Epp
inge
r Blv
d
8
0
7
7
157
3
Thor
nton
W
Virg
inia
Ave
/S W
adsw
orth
Blv
d
57
1
00
157
3
Lake
woo
d S
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W A
mhe
rst A
ve
7
8
7
8
157
3
Denv
er
Colfa
x Av
e/Fl
oren
ce S
t
74
82
15
6
3 Au
rora
Co
lfax
Ave/
Cook
St
7
8
7
9
156
3
Denv
er
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 3
2nd
Ave
7
5
8
1
156
3
Denv
er
S Br
oadw
ay/W
Eva
ns A
ve
6
6
8
9
156
3
Denv
er
Ham
pden
Ave
/S D
ayto
n St
84
72
15
6
3 De
nver
E
3rd
Ave/
Spad
er W
ay
7
5
8
0
155
3
Broo
mfie
ld
Glen
woo
d Dr
/30t
h St
34
1
21
155
3
Boul
der
Broa
dway
/Iris
Ave
77
78
15
5
3 Bo
ulde
r S
Colo
rado
Blv
d/M
exic
o Av
e
85
70
15
5
3 De
nver
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W 5
6th
Ave
8
8
6
6
155
3
Uni
ncor
pora
ted
Adam
s Co
unty
S
Blac
khaw
k St
/Miss
issip
pi A
ve
6
8
8
6
154
3
Auro
ra
Sher
idan
Blv
d/W
10t
h Av
e
75
79
15
4
3 La
kew
ood
Broa
dway
/Ced
ar A
ve
7
1
8
3
154
3
Boul
der
12th
Ave
/Gra
nt S
t
61
93
15
4
3 De
nver
50
53
Loca
tion
Boar
ding
s Al
ight
ings
T
otal
Act
ivity
Ti
er
Juris
dict
ion
Dow
ning
St/
30th
St
7
5
7
9
154
3
Denv
er
28th
St/
Valm
ont R
d
72
81
15
4
3 Bo
ulde
r Co
lfax
Ave/
Was
hing
ton
St
7
5
7
8
153
3
Denv
er
S U
nive
rsity
Blv
d/Ev
ans A
ve
7
4
7
9
153
3
Denv
er
W C
olfa
x Av
e/Ga
rriso
n St
1
17
3
6
152
3
Lake
woo
d Vi
a Ap
pia/
Sout
h Bo
ulde
r Rd
71
82
15
2
3 Lo
uisv
ille
18th
St/
Arap
ahoe
St
3
8
114
15
2
3 De
nver
33
rd A
ve/O
akla
nd S
t
1
41
1
1
151
3
Auro
ra
Fede
ral B
lvd/
W H
ighl
and
Park
Pl
8
7
6
3
151
3
Denv
er
51
SourcesAmerican Public Transit Association. “Security Lighting for Transit Passenger Facilities.” APTA Standards Development Program: Recommended Practice. APTA SS-SIS-RP-001-10, October 2009.
Brakewood, Candace & Watkins, Kari “A Literature Review of the Passenger Benefits of Real-Time Transit Information.” Transport Reviews. 2018.
Buchanan, Mary & Hovenkotter, Kirk. “From Sorry to Superb: Everything You Need to Know about Great Bus Stops.” TransitCenter, October 2018
City and County of Denver. “DenverMoves:Transit – State of the System.” February 2017
Engel-Yan, Joshua & Leonard, Amanda. “Mobility Hub Guidelines: Tools for Achieving Successful Station Areas.” ITE Journal Volume 82, 2012
Fan, Yingling, Guthrie, Andrew, & Levinson, David. “Perception of Waiting Time at Transit Stops and Stations.” Center for Transportation Studies University of Minnesota, 2016
Federal Transit Administration Circular “Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Guidance.” FTA C 4710.1. Issued November 4, 2015.
Higashide, Steven. “Who’s on Board 2016: What Today’s Riders Teach Us About Transit That Works.” TransitCenter, 2016
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). “Curbside Management Practitioners Guide.” 2018
Kim, Ja Young, Bartholomew, Keith, & Ewing, Reid. “Impacts of Bus Stop Improvements.” Utah Department of Transportation – Research Division Report No. UT-18.04, 2018
Masabi. “Key Factors Influencing Ridership in North America: The Emerging Urban Mobility Ecosystem.” Mass Transit Rider Research Report, May 2018.
Murphy, Colin. “Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit.” Shared-Use Mobility Center, American Public Transportation Association, March 2016.
NACTO, Bike Share Station Siting Guide, 2016
NACTO, Transit Streets Design Guide, 2016
NACTO, Policy 2018: Guidelines for the Regulation and Management of Shared Active Transportation, 2018
Parzen, Julia. “Shared-Use Mobility Reference Guide.” Shared-Use Mobility Center, 2015
Reese, Malinda. “Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary.” January 2018
RTD Bus Infrastructure Design Guidelines and Criteria. Published 2016
RTD Service Development Policies and Standards. Revised July 22, 2016.
Turnbull, Katherine F., Pratt, Richard H., Evans IV, John E. “TCRP Report 95: Park-and-Ride/Pool: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes.” 2004
Watkins, Kari, Ferris, Brian, Borning, Alan, Rutherford, G. Scott, and Layton, David. “Where Is My Bus? Impact of Mobile Real-Time Information on the Perceived and Actual Wait Time of Transit Riders.” Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice 45(8):839-848, October 2011