ron poling school of physics and astronomy college of science and engineering

23
D + Leptonic and D 0 Semileptonic Decays First Results from BESIII Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering University of Minnesota

Upload: lida

Post on 22-Feb-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

D + Leptonic and D 0 Semileptonic Decays First Results from BESIII. Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering University of Minnesota. Window on Weak and Strong Physics. Leptonic Decay. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

D+ Leptonic and D0 Semileptonic Decays First Results from BESIII

Ron PolingSchool of Physics and Astronomy

College of Science and EngineeringUniversity of Minnesota

Page 2: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 2

Window on Weak and Strong Physics

• Decay constant fD incorporates the strong interaction effects (wave function at the origin)

• Use charm leptonic decays to validate theory (LQCD) and apply to B mixing, which requires fB

• Multiple tests with charm: fD, fDs (esp. ratios)• Sensitivity to New Physics

5 July 2012

Leptonic Decay

Page 3: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 3

Window on Weak and Strong Physics

• Use Strong Interaction theory (LQCD) for form factor, extract CKM

• Use other measurements and unitarity for CKM and test theory

• Theoretical uncertainties can be reduced in determinations of |Vub| if FF calculations can be validated with charm

• Multiple tests available, semileptonic D decays to pseudoscalar mesons are cleanest

5 July 2012

Semileptonic Decay

Page 4: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 4

Window on Weak and Strong Physics

• Widths of mixing and |Vub| bands will be reduced as charm validates LQCD

• Long-term goal: Over-constrain CKM and search for New Physics

5 July 2012

Page 5: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Charm Physics at Threshold

5 July 2012 Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 5

• At ψ(3770) charm production is and• Fully reconstruct about 15% of D decays

• Hadronic tag on one side gives “beam” of D0 or D+ on the other side for leptonic/semileptonic studies. Neutrino is reconstructed from missing energy and momentum

Page 6: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 6

BESIII at BEPCII

• Comparable capabilities to CLEO-c, plus muon ID• The big advantage: BEPCII is a two-ring machine designed for charm

– Design (achieved) luminosity at ψ(3770): 1 (0.65) x 1033

5 July 2012

Page 7: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 7

BESIII Data

5 July 2012

• World’s largest ψ(3770) sample

• Tools/techniques for precision charm physics still under development – all results are PRELIMINARY– analysis is “partially blind” – 0.92 fb-1

analyzed so far. Full 2.9 fb-1 later for final results

Page 8: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 8

- Tag Selection

• Nine D- tag modes

5 July 2012

BESIII Preliminary

Page 9: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 9

425 signal candidates: small BG, mom. dist.consistent with

BESIII Preliminary

BESIII Preliminary

• Exactly one track in addition to tag, with the right charge

• Positive muon identification• No extra photon• Select on consistency with

leptonic decay:

- Signal Selection

Page 10: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 105 July 2012

• Positive muon ID requirement reduces background at the expense of a ~20% efficiency loss

- Sample Events

Page 11: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 115 July 2012

MC BG est.: Indep. data est.:

MCBESIII Preliminary

- Backgrounds

Page 12: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 125 July 2012

• Excellent agreement with CLEO-c• Still statistics limited – need more data!

BESIII Preliminary

- Results

Page 13: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 135 July 2012

LQCD (HPQCD 2012)

LQCD (FNAL/MILC 2012)

(208.3±1.0±3.3) MeV

(219±11) MeV

- Comparisons (from G. Rong)

Page 14: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 14

• Four D0 tag modes

5 July 2012

- Tag Selection

Page 15: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 15

• Tag plus exactly two oppositely-charged tracks

• Kaon/pion/electron ID• Electron has right charge • No extra neutral energy• Select on consistency with

semileptonic decay

BESIII Preliminary

BESIII Preliminary

• Fit U distribution to extract yield

- Signal Selection

Page 16: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

5 July 2012 Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 16

• Systematic uncertainties are preliminary• Good consistency with CLEO-c, statistical precision is

comparable with only 1/3 data analyzed

BESIII Preliminary

- Branching Fraction

Page 17: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 17

• Partition D0 semileptonic candidates in bins of

• Fit U distribution in each q2 binBESIII Preliminary BESIII Preliminary

with

- q2 distribution

Page 18: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 18

• Points are data with statistical errors only• Curves are Fermilab/MILC (arXiv:1111.5471) with ±1σ

(statististical) bands

BESIII PreliminaryBESIII Preliminary

- Project f(q2)

Page 19: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 19

Simple Pole Model

Modified Pole Model

Series Expansion

Becher and Hill PLB 633, 61 (‘06)

Becirevic and Kaidalov PLB 478, 417 (‘00)

- FF Parameterizations

Page 20: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 20

- FF Fits

Page 21: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 20125 July 2012 21

• Reasonable consistency with CLEO-c, comparable precision with 2/3 of data still to analyze

BESIII Preliminary

- FF Results

Page 22: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 22

Future Charm Prospects at BESIII

• Finalize and on the 2.9 fb-1 ψ(3770) sample

• Extend to and other modes• Highlights of coming data runs:

2012-2013 ECM=4260 and 4360 MeV for “XYZ” studies (0.5 fb-1 each)

2013-2014 ECM=4170 MeV for Ds (~2.4 fb-1)

TBD Additional ψ(3770) data

5 July 2012

Page 23: Ron Poling School of Physics and Astronomy College of Science and Engineering

5 July 2012 Ron Poling - ICHEP 2012 23

Summary and Conclusions

• First results from the BESIII experiment have been presented on

• BESIII has arrived for precision charm physics, with more data and more measurements to come

– D0 Semileptonic Decays

– D+ Leptonic Decays