role of spatial planning as an enabler for redd readiness...
TRANSCRIPT
Role of Spatial Planning
as an Enabler for REDD
Readiness in East
Kalimantan
Workshop presentation
Samarinda, November 2010
1
Introduction to East Kalimantan
Map of East Kalimantan
▪ Economy dominated by extraction of
natural resources1
SOURCE: Indonesian Bureau of Statistics
176
204
255
258
324
Kal Barat
Papua
Kal Tim
Riau
Kal Teng
Land area: 19.7M ha
Natural Forest: 12.8 M ha
Population: 3,550,586
GDP: IDR 103 trillion
GDP per capita ranked 2nd
out of 33 provinces1
1 For 2007
Facts on GDP and emissions
Top five emitting provinces
MtCO2e annually
19
1100% =
Services/Others
Manufacturing
Construction
Oil & Gas
Coal & Mining
Forestry
Agriculture
Palm oil/
Estate crops
103 Trillion IDR
2 3
46
20
54
▪ 3rd largest carbon emitting province in
Indonesia2
GDP breakdown of East Kalimantan
Percentage (2008)
2
▪ Roll out pilot program across
the whole province once
readiness program has been
completed and funding for
continuation has been secured
▪ Continue to develop key
enablers (e.g., spatial planning,
MRV, etc)
▪ Build key enablers
– Basic MRV systems,
including province baseline
– Integrated spatial planning
– Financial distribution
mechanisms
– Community engagement
mechanism
▪ Develop pilot projects and
identify funding sources
▪ Design and operationalize
Governor green delivery unit
East Kalimantan is at a transition from strategy
to implementation for its low carbon growth plan
SOURCE: Team analysis
Low carbon growth strategy
(Feb-Jul 2010)
Basic readiness
implementation
(Aug 2010-Feb 2011)
Low carbon growth pilots
(Feb-Dec 2011)
▪ Develop a low carbon growth
strategy that identifies
– Identifies major sources of
emissions across the
province and across different
industry sectors
– Identifies major abatement
opportunities and actions for
promoting sustainable
livelihoods
– Identifies critical enablers
– Analyzes costs for carbon
abatement and sustainable
alternative livelihoods
Primary focus
of document
3
BAU emissions in East Kalimantan will grow to 331 MtCO2e by 2030 –
pursuing a low carbon strategy can potentially reduce this by 60%
-39
100
100
91
-22-22
69
42
45
2010
255
61
34
50
O&G
11
Absorption
18
1.4% p.a.
Oil palm
Agri
Peat fire
Forest
degrad-
ation
298
2020
50
Peat
44
74
331
2030
Deforest-
ation
14
70
76
56
331
61
134
16
O&G 20
Mining
Forest &
Forest Industry
Agri-
culture
After
abatement
Services
22Con-
struction
Total
197Initiatives
11
Manu-
facturing
Palm oil
-60%
18.5
21.0
22.9
16.8
3.2
6.1
4.8
6.7
100
East Kalimantan Emissions
M tCO2e
Abatement potential in 2030
M tCO2e
In the BAU scenario, CO2e emissions would reach
331 Mt by 2030…
…however pursuing a sustainable growth path can
reduce this by 60 percent
Share of
total (%)
SOURCE: Team analysis
4
East Kalimantan’s low carbon growth strategy provides a guide towards
lower emissions in-line with the President’s target
East Kalimantan has now developed a low carbon growth
strategy (LCGS)…
CO2 mitigation
▪ Estimate size of current
and future emissions
▪ Assess the technical
abatement potential and
feasibility, and
implementation cost
Economic development
▪ Analyze existing
competitive strengths
and weaknesses
▪ Explore potential new
sources
of growth
Institutional enablers
▪ Develop strategy for
critical enablers (e.g.,
MRV, spatial planning)
▪ Estimate the total costs
of opportunities
East Kalimantan’s LCGS
Draft 2010
… the challenge is to now put the strategy
into action
“We are devising an energy mix policy
that will reduce our emissions by 26%
by 2020. With international support, we
are confident we can reduce emissions
by as much as 41%”
“I will not let even one span of forest
be violated or destroyed”
Presiden Susilo
Bambang
Yudhoyono
2009
East Kal Governor
Pak Awang Farouk
2010
East Kalimantan’s LCGS
Draft 2010Content of LCGS
5
Pilot projects:
▪ RIL
▪ Degraded
land swap
▪ Peatland
rehabilitation
Government
alignment:
▪ District
roadshows
▪ Broad
stakeholder
consultation
Multi-
stakeholder
approach
▪ Joint working
groups
▪ Private sector
involvement
A REDD Readiness action plan in East Kalimantan will need to address the
root causes of emissions…
REDD Readiness
Solve Social Conflicts by Land Titling
Revision of Spatial Plan
6
East Kalimantan has already lost 35 percent of its natural forest
cover
0
5
10
15
20
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 501950… 90 95 2000 5 10
-35%
Other forests
Conservation forest
▪ Annual deforestation rate
assumed to settle at 150,000 ha
up to 2050
▪ Deforestation rate in 2000-2010
period 200-250,000 ha
Forest area
Million ha
SOURCE: Kaltim Green, Ministry of Forestry Statistics 2000, 2005, 2007, Dinas Kehutanan provinsi Kaltim 2008
PRELIMINARY
50% cover
7
Nearly 2.5 million ha of natural forest are suggested to be
released from the Kawasan Hutan
SOURCE: Daemeter Consulting 2010
PRELIMINARY
25,854
Protected Forest (HL) 3,358,874
Nature Park (THR) 56,070
National Park (TN) 1,214,323
Nature Reserve (CA) 190,939
Agricultural land (KBNK) 6,701,463
Production Forest (KBK) 7,725,162
Research Forest (HPP)
427,955
2,188,073
National Strategic Zone
Natural Forest
Non Forest/Non natural Forest
Water bodies
8
Being conservative about land use change will be key part of setting East
Kalimantan on a low emission trajectory
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
40 50 60 70 80
CO2 emissionsMtCO2e
2030
Remaining forest coverPercent
2020
Today
2000
BAU
scenario4
Original request for
1.3M2 ha conversion
Revised 0.6M3 ha target
SOURCE: Interviews with Bappeda Kaltim; team analysis
Range of solutions
under abatement
scenario
KalTim LCGS
target by 2030
1
2
1 Based on LCGS for East Kalimantan
2 Originally submitted spatial plan by Bappeda Kaltim from aggregated district level plans in 2009
3 Ministry of Forestry has approved a maximum forest conversion to KBNK of 600,000 ha after negotiation (Bappeda)
4 Based on deforestation rate of 150,000 ha per annum
▪ Trajectory of deforest-
ation and emissions is
expected to achieve
50% deforestation and
330 MtCO2e1 emiss-
ions by 2030
▪ A step change is
required to move away
from BAU by:
– Direct abatement
(efficiency, product-
ivity measures)
– Inherently low
carbon growth
strategies
supported by low-
carbon spatial
planning
Pres. SBYs
26% target
9
$
A revision of the proposed spatial plan is required to address the high
emission trajectory
Rationale
High emission from peat oxidation and burning warrant
safeguarding to avoid land use over such areas
Existing RTRW places some concessions over peat
Ample degraded land is available across EastKal which can
be used to plant Oil Palm through a degraded land swap
with concession holders
Only 35% of estate crop HGU‟s are currently being fully
utilized for plantations
There is indication that operators abusing concessions for
timber sale alone
▪ Staff capability building
on tools for low-carbon
planning, e.g. OSIRIS
▪ Improve adherence of
implementation to spatial
plan
Supporting activities
+
Availability of OSIRIS tool for analyzing emission under
different land use scenarios
Need to integrate land planning with development planning
with opportunity to enhance skill at Kabupaten Bappeda
Need for alignment between State (Min of Forestry) and
district to strike right balance for land use development
Clarifying role of all stakeholders in combating illegal activity
Need to rationalize and align overlapping roles in decision
making process for granting land use between Dinas‟
Ideas to further optimize
land use within spatial plan
▪ Avoid KBNK on peatlands
and reforest degraded peat
areas
▪ Swap forest land held by
Oil Palm concession holders
with degraded land
▪ Review/revoke permit
inactive concessions
SOURCE: Team analysis
Direction and
target setting
required to
kick-start
revision
Need to align
provincial and
also national
spatial plan
with 26%/41%
emission
reduction
aspiration set
by the
Presiden
10
Degraded land in East Kalimantan is dispersed and scattered,
pointing the need for land consolidation
SOURCE: WWF Indonesia, Ministry of Forestry Indonesia, Mantel et. al 2007 (ISRIC), team analysis
Degraded land suitable for oil palm
concessions
East Kalimantan
▪ Scattered land might
cause rise in cost of
transportation,
infrastructure building,
and monitoring
▪ Multiple land locations
may lead to longer
time in negotiation
with local residents
and might involve
multiple districts with
different regulations
Slightly degraded
Degraded
Very degraded
PRELIMINARY
11
Thank you
12
In fact, 1.9M ha of forest area already exists in KBNK status and is also
in danger of deforestation
Non-
forest
Forest
14,231
2,613
11,618
(82%)
Plantation forest
Swamp and
mangrove
Secondary dryland
Primary dryland
11,618
436328
4,850
6,003
Forest
5,100
3,203
1,897
Non-
forest
Plantation forest
Mangrove
Swamp
Secondary dryland
Primary dryland
1,897
148
234
214
1,088
214
Only 82% of forest status land is actually covered by
forest
1.9M ha of intact forest resides in non-forest status land
(KBNK) and is therefore under risk of deforestation
East Kalimantan total land
area = 19.5 mn Ha
Land area in forest status (KBK)
„000 Ha, Total = 14.2 mn Ha
Land area in non-forest status (KBNK)
„000 Ha, Total = 5.1 mn Ha
2006 data for East Kal
SOURCE: “Rekalkulasi Penutupan Lahan Indonesia, 2008”; Team analysis