ripple oct dec 2007

Upload: irrc-irri

Post on 06-Apr-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    1/20Ripple October-December2007

    RIPPLE is produced by the Irrigated Rice Research Consortium (IRRC) with support from the Swiss Agency for DevelopmentCooperation (SDC). The IRRC promotes international links among scientists, managers, communicators, and farmers in lowland irrigrice environments.

    April 2006, Vol. 1, No. 2

    www.irri.org/irrc/

    Irrigated Rice Research Consortium Rice Research for Intensified Production and Prosperity in Lowland Ecosyste

    October-December 2007, Vol. 2, No

    International Rice Research Institute

    RIPPLE revisits IRRCs Phase 3

    Alot has happened for the

    Irrigated Rice ResearchConsortium (IRRC) over

    the past years, especially the many

    successes and breakthroughs for

    the 11 countries where the IRRC

    operates. As 2007 draws to a close

    and ushers in 2008, the final year of

    IRRC Phase 3, RIPPLE takes a look

    back at the events and activities that

    have taken place in each country.

    Swiss Agency for Developmand Cooperation SDC

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    2/20

    2Ripple October-December 2007

    > continued on page 3

    Rice is life in Bangladesh

    For 148 million

    Bangladeshis, rice

    provides on average

    75% of their daily calorie

    intake. Just as importantly,

    agriculture employs about

    65% of the workforce. In

    rural communities, income

    from rice still significantly

    determines the level of

    secondary schooling reached.

    In the districts of Rang-

    pur and Dinajpur in northernBangladesh, the rural poor

    face famine in October and

    November because of sea-

    sonal scarcity of agricultural

    employment. In Rangpur,

    about 50% of the 600,000

    households face hunger dur-

    ing this period, which in Ben-

    gali is known as monga. Half

    of these households that face

    severe hunger consume only

    one meal a day for 47 days a

    week during monga. To try to

    alleviate some of this hard-

    ship, the Bangladesh Rice Re-

    search Institute (BRRI), local

    nongovernment organizations

    (NGOs), and the Irrigated

    Rice Research Consortium

    (IRRC) have collaborated

    to increase the livelihood

    options available to farmers

    through rice cultivation.

    Direct-seeded rice andweed managementDr. M.A. Mazid, an

    agronomist of the BRRI,

    and Dr. David Johnson, a

    weed scientist of the Interna-

    tional Rice Research Institute

    (IRRI), have worked together

    with funding from the IRRC

    to verify the potential of di-

    rect-seeded rice (DSR) as an

    option to transplanted rice in

    different cropping systems. In

    Bangladesh, direct seeding al-

    lows the crop to be harvested

    earlier, because the crop dura-

    tion is shorter than for trans-

    planted rice and, often, DSR

    can be established earlier

    than transplanted rice as it is

    not necessary to puddle the

    land. Initially, DSR became a

    research focus because, as put

    succinctly by Dr. Johnson, It

    takes about 500 millimeters

    of cu-

    mulative

    rainfall for

    a farmer

    to be able

    to estab-

    lish a rice

    crop through transplanting.

    If farmers direct-seed, they

    can establish the crop fromabout one-third of that.

    By direct seeding, farm-

    ers can avoid the hardships of

    2003, 2004, and 2005, when

    the monsoon rains arrived so

    late that a crop could not be

    established in time. So, the

    timing of crop establishment

    is the key (see The Direct

    Approach, Rice Today,

    April-June 2006). The earlier

    harvest increases the chance

    that there will be sufficient

    soil moisture and rainfall to

    grow a second crop such as

    chickpea, maize, potato, or

    vegetables. Further, labor is

    in high demand at the plant-

    ing stage of the crop and costs

    therefore escalate. DSR helps

    reduce the labor required

    for crop establishment and

    even out the labor demand by

    providing job opportunities

    over a longer

    period.

    A major

    constraint to

    growing DSR

    is the

    increased

    weed problems compared

    with the more traditional

    transplanting of rice seed-lings. To help overcome the

    weed problems, current

    activities have drawn on past

    collaborative work in India

    and Bangladesh with the

    Natural Resources Institute of

    the UK.

    Dr. Mazid and Dr.

    Johnson have focused on

    the benefits and challenges

    of different crop establish-

    ment technologies and how

    these can be integrated into

    different rice production

    technologies. Together with

    the local NGOs, they have

    taken their DSR and weed

    management technologies to

    the poor farmers and worked

    closely with them in testingand verifying their potential.

    In 2007, the importance

    of timely crop establish-

    ment through using DSR was

    demonstrated not by the late

    arrival of the monsoons but

    by the massive and destruc-

    tive floods that occurred in

    late July. Upendra Nathray, a

    struggling farmer from Nil-

    pharami district, explains, I

    planted my crop using a drum

    seeder. This is the first time Iused this technology. I planted

    my crop early. After 2 weeks,

    the crop looked sickly and I

    wanted to destroy the crop

    and go back to transplant-

    ing. I was talked out of doing

    this by the local NGO staff

    (who work closely with Dr.

    Mazid). I reluctantly agreed

    to wait another week. And

    then the heavy rains began.

    The recently transplanted rice

    was destroyed by the floods.

    The DSR was strong and tall

    enough to survive. Now my

    crop is the best in the vil-

    lage! I am now convinced of

    the benefits of DSR and I tell

    my neighbors that they, too,

    should try this technology.

    DSR provides hopefor fighting monga

    The early establishment

    of a DSR crop using a drumseeder or a lithao (a low-cost

    metal plow drawn by two

    people), combined with a

    shorter duration variety of

    rice, provides an opportunity

    for crops to be harvested dur-

    ing the monga. Recent trials

    have shown that the shorter

    duration rice saves 2025

    days and DSR saves 1015

    In Bangladesh, irrigated riceaccounts for 56% of the nationalrice area. Irrigated rice iscultivated on about 6.3 millionhectares, for national productionof 29.7 million tons.

    Adaptive research helpsfight famine in Bangladesh

    Dr. M.A. Mazid and Dr. David Johnson (second and third from left) visita direct-seeded field with farmers. Direct seeding has helped farmersin Bangladesh and West Bengal, India, in reestablishing their cropsafter floods destroyed them in late July. (Photo by G. Singleton)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    3/20Ripple October-December2007

    Adaptive research...from page 2

    days during the rice-growing

    season. Together, this means

    the crop will be harvested

    in mid-October rather than

    in late November, providing

    life-saving job opportuni-ties for the landless poor. Dr.

    Mazid has estimated that 63

    person-days per hectare will

    be used for the rice harvest.

    But the benefit does not

    stop there. The early harvest

    of the crop means that, in

    addition to the traditional

    two rice crops, there is an

    opportunity for a third crop.

    Around Rangpur, potato is

    usually followed by maize

    being planted in the associ-ated furrows. These crops

    provide important income for

    the poor farmers and essential

    labor opportunities during

    the monga for the landless

    families, who are classi-

    fied as ultra-poor. Some 53

    person-days per hectare over

    a 15-day period will be used.

    Achievements thus farthe importance of partner-ing

    In 2007, some 202

    farmers have been involved

    in trying DSR technology

    in six districts in northern

    Bangladesh in the T. aman

    wet-season crop. These trials

    have been established over a

    large geographic areathe

    sites are up to 100 kilometers

    apart. This was made pos-

    sible by conducting training

    courses directed at trainingof trainers from Novem-

    ber 2006 to June 2007. Key

    participants at these training

    courses have been field staff

    from four NGOsInter-Co-

    operation (IC), Uday Uonkar

    Seba Songstha (USS), Gra-

    men Atto Unnyon Songstha

    (GAUS), and Rangpur Di-

    najpur Rural Service (RDRS)

    Bangladesh, and staff from

    the Department of Agricul-

    tural Extension.

    The NGO staff

    members have been

    advising farmers,

    and, if they are

    unsure about any

    issues, they have

    immediate accessto Dr. Mazid via

    his mobile phone.

    Dr. Mazid

    and Dr. Johnson

    have also advised

    the trainers on

    seed varieties,

    how to maintain

    the quality of the

    next seasons seed,

    optimal application

    of nutrients (based

    on recommenda-tions that arose from collab-

    orative studies between BRRI

    and IRRC scientists during

    Phase II of the IRRC), and

    effective weed management.

    This integrated approach has

    impressed the farmer groups

    that we visited in Augustfor

    example, we met with more

    than 60 farmers (including 25

    women) in Nilphamari and

    they highlighted how pleased

    they were to receive up-to-

    date advice on a systems ap-

    proach for growing and main-

    taining an early DSR crop.

    What next?There are three priorities

    for the immediate future:

    (i) DSR technology is

    knowledge-intensive. DSR

    (wet- or dry-seeded) and

    transplanted rice each have

    their niche in the rice produc-tion system in Rajshahi

    Division. A simple decision

    tree needs to be promoted (see

    box).

    (ii) Scaling out of DSR

    through NGOs, provin-

    cial NGOs (PNGOs), and

    farmer field schools (FFS).

    The PNGOs provide mas-

    ter trainers for FFS. For

    example, if the IRRC links

    with RSDS, they have staff

    directly responsible for 25

    PNGOs, which in turn service

    100 FFS with 25 households

    on average in each field

    school. Working through

    RSDS can provide access to

    50,000 farmer households!

    From a research perspec-

    tive, we need to develop a

    good understanding of the so-

    cial and cultural triggers and

    blocks for effective transfer of

    knowledge-intensive technol-

    ogies such as DSR. Our NGO

    partners have the expertise

    on the best way to present

    informationwe will work

    closely with them on develop-

    ing a communication strategy.

    (iii) Quantitative as-

    sessment of the economic

    and social impacts of the

    DSR technologies through

    household surveys.

    Other IRRC research inBangladesh: watermanagementan emerging issue

    In December 2005 and

    February 2007, Dr. T.P. Tuong

    (IRRI), made presentations

    on water-saving technologies

    at the BRRIs Department of

    Water Management. These

    initiatives led to the testing of

    alternate wetting and dry-

    ing (AWD) and the follow-

    ing results were attained:

    a) AWD reduced the

    frequency of irrigation

    without affecting yield.

    The water saved was used

    to increase the area irri-

    gated by more than 10%.

    b) The cost of irrigation

    decreased, and the depletion

    of groundwater declined.

    c) The extra cost of

    weeding was compensated for

    by savings in fuel costs and

    from more consistent yields.

    In August 2007, Dr.

    Ruben Lampayan (IRRC

    Water-Saving WG leader) and

    scientists of BRRIs Depart-

    ment of Water Management

    conducted a training course at

    BRRI on AWD. As with DSR

    AWD technology offers

    important low-cost efficien-

    cies for the rural poor ofBangladesh. In addition,

    there are also promising

    environmental benefits. An

    escalation of adaptive re-

    search on AWD in the rice

    fields of farmers is planned

    for Bangladesh.

    Grant Singleton (g.singletonand David Johnson

    ([email protected]

    Illustrative decision tree for adoption of direct seedingwith respect to favorable rainfed lowland rice CAN FIELD BE DRAINED?

    CAN FIELD BE DRY CULTIVATED?

    IS Cynodon dactylon orCyperus rotundus ABSENT?

    DRY SEEDING

    into a seedbed

    WET SEEDING

    sowing onto puddled saturated soil

    ARE SOIL CONDITIONS SUITABLE

    FOR LINE SEEDING BY MACHINERY?

    IS THERE A NEED FOR I NTERROW

    CULTIVATION OR SUBSTANTIAL HANDWEEDING?

    ARE ANNUAL GRASSES ABSENT?

    IS GOOD WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE?

    APPLY HERBICIDE +

    LIMITED MANUAL WEEDINGAPPLY HERBICIDE + MANUAL WEEDING

    OR INTERROW CULTIVATION

    BROADCAST BROADCASTDRILLSEED DRUMSEED

    YesYesNo No

    Yes No

    TRANSPLANT

    Yes No

    Yes NoCROP ESTABLISHMENT

    WEED MANAGEMENT

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    4/20

    4Ripple October-December 2007

    > continued on page 5

    Building momentum in Laos

    Despite major hurdles,

    the Lao Peoples

    Democratic Republic

    (PDR) is fighting fiercely

    against poverty. According

    to the World Bank, thissmall landlocked nation,

    one of the poorest in East

    Asia, is addressing social

    inequities and building

    stronger capacity to manage

    its natural resources.

    The International Rice

    Research Institute (IRRI)

    is one of the international

    organizations determined to

    help Lao PDR. About 80% of

    the countrys arable land is

    devoted to rice growing. And,since 1990, IRRI, with finan-

    cial support from the Swiss

    Agency for Development

    and Cooperation, has been

    helping improve Lao PDRs

    research and training capac-

    ity, and pave the countrys

    way to r ice self-sufficiency.

    Between 1990 and 2004, rice

    production increased from

    1.5 million tons to 2.5 million

    tons, which has been valued

    at US$819 million per year.

    The Irrigated Rice Re-

    search Consortium (IRRC)

    of IRRI plans to build on

    this success. Current proj-

    ects include postproduction,

    crop establishment, weed

    management, and rodent

    management. A new project

    on water management is at the

    planning stage with activities

    already under way through

    a PhD project by Randy

    Ritzema at the Universityof California-Davis, USA.

    Bring in the harvestSince 2003, the Post-

    production Work Group

    (PPWG) of IRRC has made

    its presence felt in the country

    where, until then, posthar-

    vest problems of rice were

    not addressed. Collaboration

    started with the evaluation of

    commercial hermetic storage

    systems in research centersin Luang Prabang, Vientiane,

    and Savannakhet. Hermetic

    storage improves grain qual-

    ity and seed viability because

    it maintains the original

    grain moisture content and

    reduces pest damage (with-

    out using insecticides). The

    National Agriculture and

    Forestry Research Institute

    (NAFRI), a government

    institution and Lao partner of

    PPWG, is now interested in

    large-scale hermetic storage

    systems for storing seeds.

    In 2005, the PPWG

    conducted a rapid rural as-

    sessment of the postharvest

    situation of rice in Lao PDR

    to establish baseline data

    and identify major interven-

    tion points for improved

    postharvest management.

    In May 2006, PPWGleader Martin Gummert and

    his team conducted a training

    course on postharvest man-

    agement for improved quality

    of rice grain and seed in Vien-

    tiane. Eighteen participants

    from extension systems, rice

    mills, and NAFRI learned

    about postharvest processes

    through computer-based

    courses developed by the

    Work Group. This was the

    first time that researchers,

    extension workers, and the

    private sector have gathered

    to discuss postharvest issues

    such as grain and seed qual-

    ity. Improved postharvest

    management options were

    also discussed, since many

    rice millers experienced poor

    milling quality of dry-season

    crops because of the low level

    of postharvest mechaniza-

    tion. The participants weredelighted about the computer-

    based learning course and the

    training. Most of them were

    eager to use the IRRI Super

    Bag, while some asked for a

    more specific course on rice

    milling and improved milling

    technologies. One of the Work

    Groups current activities is

    evaluating hermetic storage

    systems such as the Super Bag

    among farmers in Lao PDR.

    To assist Lao scientists in

    developing national and

    export standards for rice, the

    PPWG has provided informa-tion on standards used by

    neighboring and rice-import-

    ing countries. The Work

    Group has also formulated

    recommendations for the

    improvement of the seed

    drying room at the National

    Agricultural Research Center.

    During a visit to Vien-

    tiane in May 2007, Mr.

    Gummert and his assistant,

    agricultural engineer Carlito

    Balingbing, met with Outai

    Taimany, who previously

    attended an IRRC training

    on grain-drying systems and

    dryer fabrication in Vietnam

    in 2005. Mr. Taimany is now

    developing flat-bed dryers and

    low-cost, farm-level dryers,

    and applying his own designs

    on dryer technology. He has

    installed one dryer for dem-

    onstration in Vientiane and

    another one in Savannakhet,and is also planning to de-

    velop rice mills in the future.

    As a service to the

    Helvetas-funded ProRice

    Project, PPWG members have

    assessed four rice mills and

    developed business plans for

    an export-oriented produc-

    tion of organic rice. Hermetic

    Super Bags and portable

    Dr. Grant Singleton (left) guidesin constructing a trap-barriersystem for catching rats, pestsfor which farmers have the leastcontrol.

    Training participants use a pedal thresher at the National AgriculturalResearch Center in May 2006 in Vientiane, Lao PDR.(Photo by G. Claessens)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    5/20Ripple October-December2007

    Cambodias continuingpostharvest quest

    Building momentum...from page 5

    grain-quality assessment tools

    were provided for evaluation

    by organic rice farmers.

    After participating in a

    combine harvesting train-

    ing organized by the PPWGin Cambodia in 2007, Dr.

    Poudalay from the Savan-

    nakhet research station has

    imported one small com-

    bine from Vietnam, since

    labor shortage is becoming

    a problem in that province.

    In November this

    year, the PPWG will

    conduct a training activ-

    ity on laser leveling.

    Protecting rice in theuplands

    Meanwhile, the Labor

    Productivity Work Group,

    led by Dr. David Johnson,

    also has activities linked

    with IRRIs Consortium for

    Unfavorable Rice Environ-

    ments. Hillside terraces have

    been developed in some areas,

    which have considerable

    potential to raise productivity.

    These terraced areas are com-

    monly well developed with

    level-bunded terraces that are

    either rainfed or may receive

    supplementary irrigation from

    diverted streams, allowing a

    second crop. In 2007, studies

    are ongoing to determine the

    losses due to weeds and the

    principal weed species in theseedbank. Training in weed

    sampling and identification

    has already been conducted

    with the national research andextension staff. Opportuni-

    ties exist to extend avail-

    able technologies for these

    lowland rice areas, including

    the use of sheltered nurser-

    ies for rice fields that are

    700 meters above sea level

    to limit the effects of cold on

    the second rice crop. There

    are also opportunities to

    raise productivity through

    soil fertility management

    and improved cultivars.

    Dr. Grant Singleton,

    IRRC coordinator, will also

    apply his rodent expertise

    in the lowland areas in the

    upland regions of Lao PDR.

    In these agroecosystems,

    rats are among the top three

    pests of farmers (weeds areclearly number one). How-

    ever, farmers rank rats as the

    problem they have the least

    control over. Of part icularconcern is the impact of rats

    on the second rice crop in

    these valley floors. Indeed,

    in some areas, farmers will

    not even attempt to grow a

    second crop because of rats.

    This forgone loss is an im-

    portant constraint to farmers.

    One hectare of lowland rice

    produces the equivalent of

    about 3.5 hectares of upland

    rice. If a second crop could

    be produced, the ratio would

    be 7 to 1 because only one

    rice crop can be grown per

    year on the sloping uplands.

    A new research project

    has been developed with

    colleagues from the National

    Rice Research Program (led

    by Dr. Bounneuang DouangBoopha) to validate manage-

    ment actions for the first rice

    crop to protect grain stores

    in villages. These actions

    were developed in a previ-

    ous study of NAFRI and the

    CSIRO, Australia, but have

    not been tested beyond their

    pilot study. The aim is to

    determine the likelihood of

    adoption and diffusion of

    rodent management technolo-

    gies in upland villages. Theproject will also quantify the

    effects of rats and the tim-

    ing of their damage to the

    second rice crop in lowland

    valleys. This information will

    provide the foundation for

    developing a project pro-

    posal aimed at managing rats

    throughout the year in these

    important lowland crops.

    Trina Mendoza, Martin Gummer([email protected]), Gran

    Singleton, and David Johnson

    About 10% of the rice area in Lao PDR is irrigated,contributing to about 13.5% of the national production.From 12,000 hectares in 1990, the irrigated area in2004 increased to 77,000 hectares or by 540%, whilethe yields have grown by 30% (from 3.42 tons/hectarein 1990 to 4.45 tons/hectare in 2004). Total produc-tion from irrigated rice has thus increased from 41,000tons to 341,000 tons, an increase of more than 830%.

    > continued on page 6

    In Cambodia, the

    Postproduction Work

    Group has joined

    resources with the Asian

    Development Bank and

    the Japan Fund for Poverty

    Reduction in an International

    Rice Research Institute

    (IRRI) project called

    Improving Poor FarmersLivelihoods through

    Improved Rice Postharvest

    Technology. The project

    aims to demonstrate in

    eight villages, four in

    Battambang and another

    four in Prey Veng, that

    improved harvesting, drying,

    storage, and milling can help

    farmers increase incomes

    from their rice harvests

    and improve the quality of

    grain and seeds throughout

    the postharvest chain.

    Activities started in Feb-

    ruary 2006 with establishing

    baseline data and identify-

    ing the needs of 382 farmers

    and 27 rice millers. In 2006,

    project counterparts and staff

    from the provincial agricul-

    tural extension services weretrained on improved post-

    harvest management options

    (training of trainers). In the

    second half of 2006 and 2007,

    farmers in the eight villages

    received training and advice

    on grain and seed quality, and

    safe storage options, includ-

    ing hermetic storage, drying,

    and milling. All farmers who

    The Super Bag earns an additional incomeof US$9 per cropping season for farmersin Battambang, Cambodia.(Photo by M. Gummert)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    6/20

    6Ripple October-December 2007

    Cambodias continuing...from page 5

    participated in training activi-

    ties received hermetic Super

    Bags, and farmers groups in

    each village are also field-

    testing the low-cost moisture

    meter and were provided withscales to check with the scales

    owned by some traders.

    Some highlights and

    indicators of impact follow.

    Farmers can now safely

    store their seeds without

    losing germination for 69

    months by using the Super

    Bags. This means that they

    can sell more grain in the

    market since they can reduce

    the seed rate. Many are now

    asking where to buy the bags.The project also helps farmers

    to improve their traditional

    granaries for grain storage.

    In Battambang, the

    project has helped a farmers

    group set up a farmer pro-

    cessing center that includes

    a dryer, a village rice mill,

    and a commercial hermetic

    storage system with 5-ton

    capacity for safe storage.

    Farmers benefit from higher

    milling yields. The bran, a

    by-product from milling that

    usually stays with the milleras payment now stays with

    the group, and some rice from

    the mill is sold as under-

    milled rice at a higher price to

    health-conscious consumers.

    The project imported a

    mini combine harvester from

    Vietnam and conducted a

    series of training and demon-

    stration activities in both

    provinces. Private contractors

    are starting to import com-

    bine harvesters from Viet-

    nam, Thailand, and China,

    which will help farmers to

    lower harvesting costs and

    reduce losses. In each village,

    farmers now receive up-to-

    date market information about

    rice prices in village, provin-

    cial, and Phnom Penh mar-

    kets. This information is

    posted on village price boards

    that are accessible to all

    villagers. The information is

    collected every 3 days and

    sent to mobile phones of the

    bulletin board managers.

    Farmers increasingly base

    their marketing decisions on

    the market information andbelieve that they are in a

    better negotiating position

    because they are better

    informed.

    Martin Gummer

    In Cambodia, irrigated rice accounts for 15% of thenational rice area and is cultivated on about 360,000hectares, contributing to a national production of5.8 million tons.

    Malaysia and Sri

    Lanka have many

    things in common.

    In both countries, labor

    costs are relatively high,

    rice is largely established by

    direct seeding, and weeds

    cause major problems,

    especially weedy rice.

    Weedy rice is closely re-

    lated to cultivated rice and is

    a serious threat in direct-seed-

    ed rice. At present, no singlemanagement technique can

    effectively control weedy rice.

    Malaysia, Vietnam, and

    Thailand have the largest

    areas in Asia in weedy rice

    infestation. When the weed

    first appeared in Malaysia in

    1988, farmers did not recog-

    nize it as a problem and did

    little to check its spread, says

    Dr. Azmi bin Man, weed

    scientist and collaborator of

    the Irrigated Rice Research

    Consortium (IRRC) Labor

    Productivity Work Group

    (LPWG). Now, most rice

    fields in Peninsular Malaysia

    and Sabah are affected, and it

    is estimated that weedy rice is

    causing crop losses valued at

    US$25 million a year on the

    peninsula.

    Experiments have been

    done in Malaysia through

    collaboration with Dr. Azmi

    and the Malaysian Agricul-

    tural Research and Develop-

    ment Institute. Main efforts

    are aimed at identifying the

    amount of yield losses and

    determining the influence

    of establishment measures.

    Awareness of the problem

    has been raised through the

    production of theBe aware of

    weedy rice in Asia brochure,

    which has been translated

    into four languages. Making

    people aware of weedy rice is

    an important step, as initial

    infestations can be over-

    looked, allowing the problem

    to become worse. If farmersare aware of weedy rice, they

    can check their seed sup-

    plies and control the spread.

    Yield losses due to weeds

    in irrigated rice in Asia are

    thought to be about 10%, but

    may be higher in areas where

    weeds survive early control

    measures, particularly in

    direct-seeded rice. Changes

    Weed watchers unite in Malaysia and Sri Lanka

    Private contractors started importing combineharvesters from Vietnam after a demonstration andtraining in early February. (Photo by M. Pyseth)

    > continued on page 7

    A Malaysian farmer rogues or removes weedy rice panicles by hand.Other interventions against weedy rice include water seeding, manualor mechanical transplanting, crop rotation, and burning of rice straw.Download the weedy rice brochure at www.irri.org/irrc.(Photo by D. Johnson)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    7/20

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    8/20

    8Ripple October-December 2007

    > continued on page 9

    ity by promoting IRRC

    water-saving technologies

    to 5,000 farmers in Bohol.

    Training activities were

    quickly conducted among

    31 water-saving agents and200 leaders of irrigators

    associations (IA). Eighteen

    AWD demonstration fields

    were established along with

    hybrid rice trials. In Febru-

    ary, Engr. Billy Mejia of NIA

    held 19 workshops among

    3,000 farmers from 19 IAs.

    ... as well as LuzonAWD is now widely

    adopted in irrigated areas in

    the Philippines and sev-eral Asian countries. The

    IRRC Water-Saving Work

    Group (WSWG) is study-

    ing the biophysical (yield,

    water use) and economic

    performance of AWD in pilot

    sites in the Philippines.

    Aside from AWD, the

    WSWG promotes the aerobic

    rice system through partici-

    patory testing of farmers in

    Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Bulacan,

    Ilocos Norte, and Bohol. In

    Bulacan, aerobic rice was

    introduced in 2004 with the

    Bulacan Agricultural State

    College through farmer par-

    ticipatory research. In 2005,

    41 farmers tried the technolo-

    gy, followed by 25 farmers in

    2006. Yields varied from 1 to

    6.8 tons per hectare. Farmers

    appreciated the low produc-

    tion costs, resistance to water

    scarcity, and good eatingquality but expressed con-

    cern over lower yields, weed

    infestation, and marketability.

    (For more on aerobic rice,

    read Ripple Vol. 2, No. 3.)

    Iloilo undergoes weedmanagement ...

    Meanwhile, weeds,

    particularly weedy rice, are

    a big problem in Iloilo, with

    the highest infestation rate

    Philippine outreach...from page 7

    of 90%. The IRRC Labor

    Productivity Work Group

    (LPWG) works with weed sci-

    entist Madonna Casimero of

    PhilRice in the fight against

    weedy rice. Dr. Casimero

    says that weedy rice has been

    a threat since it was first

    found in the Philippines in

    the 1960s because it cannotbe controlled by herbicides.

    Most farmers are not even

    aware of weedy rice. Some

    farmers think that it is only

    a mixture of different rice

    breeds, says Dr. Casimero.

    To widen the knowledge

    on weedy rice and its preven-

    tive measures and controls,

    the IRRC developed a bro-

    chure with Dr. Azmi bin Man

    of the Malaysian Agricultural

    Research and Development

    Institute. (For more on weedy

    rice in Malaysia and Sri

    Lanka, turn to pages 6-7.)

    The brochure has been trans-

    lated into Filipino and distrib-

    uted to local farmers (www.

    irri.org/irrc). LPWG weed

    scientist Joel Janiya regularly

    visits Iloilo to monitor fields

    with weedy rice. He was

    also interviewed on a local

    television channelin 2006 to introduce

    the brochure and

    discuss integrated

    weed management

    and the problem

    of weedy rice.

    A yield loss

    assessment study

    was conducted for

    wet direct seeding in

    Iloilo with farmers

    located at the tail-

    end of the irrigation

    system. Water

    control is difficult

    and unreliable in

    this part of the

    irrigation system.

    Results showed that,

    with farmers weedcontrol practices

    (early postherbicide

    application plus

    selective weeding), yield loss

    during the wet season ranged

    from 1% to 7%, whereas, in

    the dry season, yield loss

    ranged from 6% to 45%. This

    highlights the importance of

    water control in yield loss in

    wet direct-seeded rice. There

    is a parallel trial in Bohol on

    AWD in a farmers field tomonitor weed infestation and

    identify major weed species

    thriving in AWD fields. This

    monitoring is in anticipation

    of potential weed problems

    that might develop with the

    use of AWD.

    ... and nutrient and cropmanagement, too

    The Productivity and

    Sustainability Work Group

    partners with public and pri-

    vate organizations in dissemi-

    nating improved nutrient and

    crop management practices to

    increase the profit of farmers.

    The results of collaborative

    research with PhilRice before

    2005 were summarized in

    generic SSNM guidelines

    for the Philippines, which

    have been available at www.

    irri.org/irrc/ssnm since early

    2006. Since 2005, SSNM

    for rice has been presented

    at professional and technical

    meetings across the Philip-

    pines; and group training

    on SSNM was conducted at

    PhilRice headquarters, and

    in Pangasinan, Iloilo, andBohol. SSNM principles and

    guidelines are included in a

    new publication of PCARRD

    entitledPhilippines Recom-

    mends for Soil Diagnosis and

    Amelioration, which will fa-

    cilitate further dissemination

    of SSNM in various sectors of

    the agricultural community.

    The PSWG provided

    SSNM training to field staff

    of a large fertilizer company

    in the Philippines (AFCFertilizer and Chemicals,

    Inc.) in April 2005. The

    company used the principles

    of SSNM to revise its national

    fertilizer recommendations

    for rice. The net effect has

    been a better matching of

    fertilization to the needs of

    the crop for supplemental

    nutrients, which are markedly

    lower in the low-yielding

    rainy season than in the high-

    yielding, dry season.

    Dr. Greta Gabinete,

    professor of the West Visayas

    State University, developed

    locally adapted guidelines for

    SSNM with optimized seed

    rate for wet-seeded rice in

    2005-06 in Iloilo Province. In

    2007, she coordinated far mer

    participatory dissemination

    of improved crop manage-

    ment with seed rate, fertilizer

    use, and judicious use of zincoptimized for farmers condi-

    tions in seven towns in Iloilo

    Province. Technicians in the

    municipal agricultural offices

    and farmers in the barangays

    are active participants. Partic-

    ipating farmers are taking up

    a reduced seed rate because

    of increased profit through

    more effective use of fertil-

    izer and reduced diseases.

    PhilRice and IRRC weed scientists MadonnaCasimero and Joel Janiya team up against weedyrice in Iloilo. (Photo by T. Mendoza)

    The PSWG visits Iloilos wet-seeded rice fieldsin September, where locally adapted SSNMguidelines have been evaluated.(Photo by R. Buresh)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    9/20Ripple October-December2007

    Zinc has been identified

    as an important constraint

    to high yields. The needs

    for zinc fertilizer are now

    being determined through

    farmer participatory research.Collaboration has been

    established with IRRI plant

    breeders in the screening of

    zinc-efficient varieties. Future

    efforts include developing

    strategies to ensure the avail-

    ability of quality zinc fertil-

    izer at affordable prices and

    with optimal management.

    The Work Groups focus

    is now on using the scientific

    principles of SSNM in the

    participatory developmentand evaluation of field-level

    nutrient and crop management

    practices tailored to local con-

    ditions. The PSWG assisted in

    June 2007 in Bohol in devel-

    oping locally adapted SSNM

    guidelines ready for participa-

    tory evaluation by local tech-

    nicians and farmers. The prin-

    ciples of SSNM, as developed

    for rice, have been adapted

    for maize by researchers in

    the Philippines working on

    a complementary project.

    Nueva Ecija bidsrats bye bye ...

    In Zaragosa,

    Nueva Ecija, a com-

    munity-based rat

    campaign jointly

    funded by PhilRice

    and the IRRC waslaunched in June

    2006. A year later,

    a popularity con-

    test (with the person

    producing the most rat tails as

    the winner) among students

    was held in August to sustain

    the communitys participation

    in practicing recommended

    rat management. A whopping

    15,149 rat tails were counted

    at the end of the contest.

    The barangay counciland the office of the provin-

    cial agriculturist see the rat

    campaign going on a munici-

    pal level and soon province-

    wide. The IRRC will continue

    supporting the campaign as

    part of its country outreach

    program in the Philippines

    and will conduct a qualitative

    study to monitor intermediate

    outcomes and impacts from

    the recently implemented rat

    campaign, as a case study

    to gain knowledge on the

    process of how the campaign

    has become successful.

    ... while postharvestgadgets work!

    Hermetic or airtight

    containers can help double

    the life of rice seeds, main-

    tain good milling quality,and protect seeds from pests.

    In humid tropical conditions

    such as in the Philippines,

    seed and grain quality dete-

    riorate quickly within 3 4

    months of storage because

    the grains absorb water from

    surrounding air, and storage

    pests, mostly insects, ac-

    cumulate. In collaboration

    with GrainPro Philippines,

    IRRI has developed a cheap,

    farmer-friendly, 50-kilogram

    hermetic Super Bag that costs

    Philippine outreach..from page 8 less than US$1.20.

    Commercial units with

    5200-ton capacity

    are also available.

    In 2005, Philippine

    partners worked with

    the IRRC Postproduc-

    tion Work Group andVietnamese partners

    to produce commer-

    cial prototypes of a

    rice hull furnace that

    can be fitted into commonly

    used flat-bed dryers with a

    4-ton capacity. The concept

    of a rice hull furnace was

    developed back in 1996 in

    Vietnam as an alternative

    to kerosene burners used in

    most mechanical rice dryers.

    A 4-ton seed dryer, aprototype of the furnace, was

    installed for evaluation at

    PhilRice, replacing an older

    furnace type that was due for

    reconstruction. Research farm

    laborers gave good feedback

    on the automatic feeding and

    ash disposal, which reduced

    their need to stir the husk and

    remove ash in the hot, dirty

    workplace next to the furnace

    Trina MendozaRoland Buresh, Joel Janiya

    and Marianne Samson([email protected]

    Tricycle banners were part of the campaign materialsproduced by PhilRice, along with posters, T-shirts,and bookmarks. These materials were developed withinputs from rice farmers themselves. (PhilRice photo)

    Tracing IRRC tracksin Vietnam T

    he IRRC has

    been involved

    in collaborative

    research with Vietnamese

    partners for the past 10

    years. Research covers site-

    specific nutrient management(SSNM), insect management,

    crop establishment,

    postharvest management,

    water management, weed

    management, rodent

    management, and integrated

    crop management. These

    collaborations are indeed

    impressive and have

    contributed significantly to

    the sustainable growth of

    rice production in Vietnam.

    Postharvest technologiesin Vietnam and beyond

    When it comes to out-

    reach activities, the IRRC

    Postproduction Work Group

    (PPWG) has certainly made

    its mark in the region.

    In October 2005, MartinGummerts team orga-

    nized a hands-on training

    workshop on grain-drying

    systems and dryer fabrica-

    tion conducted by Dr. Phan

    Hieu Hien, then director of

    the Center for Agricultural

    Energy and Machinery at

    Nong Lam University in Ho

    Chi Minh City. This training

    > continued on page 10

    The seven participants in the training workshop on grain-dryingsystems and dryer fabrication in October 2005 in Vietnam are nowmaking dryers and dryer components in their countries.(Photo by M. Gummert)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    10/20

    10Ripple October-December 2007

    > continued on page 11

    was a catalyst for the seven

    participants from Myanmar,

    Lao PDR, Cambodia, and

    Vietnam, who are now mak-

    ing dryers and dryer com-

    ponents in their countries.That same year, the

    PPWG, along with Dr. Hiens

    team from NLU, produced

    commercial prototypes of

    rice husk furnaces that can

    be fitted into commonly used

    flat-bed dryers with a 4-ton

    paddy capacity. Rice husk is

    a cheaper and more environ-

    ment-friendly alternative to

    kerosene, which is used in

    conventional mechanical dry-

    ers. By August 2006, threecommercial furnaces had

    been installedtwo for 4-ton

    paddy dryers in Long An

    Province and one for a peanut

    dryer in Tay Ninh Province.

    The research team plans

    to monitor the commercial

    furnaces to check their

    durability and the possibility

    of upscaling the furnace

    design to a rice husk capacity

    of 50 kilograms/hour for use

    with 8-ton dryers. They also

    see the technology being

    transferred in the future to

    other countries such as Lao

    PDR, Cambodia, Myanmar,

    and possibly Indonesia.

    Other activities include

    the participatory evaluation

    of hermetic storage systems

    with 5-ton and 50-kilogram

    capacity with seed producers

    and farmers in the Mekong

    Delta, Hue, and Nam DinhProvince; collection of market

    information about rice and

    rice bran in three markets

    in South Vietnam; evalua-

    tion of two rice mills; and

    testing and adaptation of

    the IRRI moisture meter.

    The PPWG has also

    spearheaded the introduction

    of laser-leveling technologies

    for rice fields. Better leveled

    fields reduce production costs,

    Tracing IRRC...from page 9 save water, and lead to more

    even maturing and thus better

    quality rice. By providing

    demonstration equipment,

    hands-on training, and advice,

    the PPWG had helped NLU

    build a team of local laser-lev-

    eling experts. The Bac LieuSeed Center also received

    support for setting up a laser

    leveler and leveling its seed

    plots. In the meantime, a

    strong interest in laser level-

    ing has developed in the pri-

    vate and public sectors and, in

    collaboration with NLU and

    some private companies, the

    PPWG is continuing to help

    establish the local availabil-

    ity of the equipment and the

    introduction of the technol-ogy for the farmers benefit.

    Looking at impacts innutrient managementwork

    Cultivation practices for

    irrigated rice vary greatly

    across Vietnam. The wet

    seeding of relatively short-

    duration rice varieties

    common in the Mekong Delta

    of the south requires very

    different crop and nutrient

    practices for high yield and

    profit as compared with the

    intensive cropping of trans-

    planted rice, often with

    hybrids and typically with the

    use of manure, in the north.

    Research on the development

    and evaluation of SSNM

    started in the Mekong Delta

    in the mid-1990s, and, in

    1997, the research expanded

    to the Red River Delta in the

    north. In late 2004, research

    started in central Vietnam.

    This led to the development of

    a series of locally adapted

    SSNM practices tailored to

    specificrice

    cultivation

    practices,

    soils, and

    regions in

    the

    country. The guidelines for

    the locally adapted SSNM

    practices are available on the

    SSNM Web site (www.irri.

    org/irrc/ssnm).

    The locally adapted

    SSNM practices have beenwidely evaluated, promoted,

    and disseminated through

    provincial and regional exten-

    sion initiatives in the Mekong

    Delta and in northern Viet-

    nam. In northern Vietnam,

    farmers using SSNM in five

    rice-growing areas increased

    their rice yield by as much as

    15% during the dry season

    and by 8% in the wet sea-

    son, realizing a net benefit of

    US$150 per hectare per year.

    Training on SSNM together

    with best crop management

    had been provided to local

    extension in 11 provinces in

    northern Vietnam by 2006.

    The national integrated

    pest management program

    in Vietnam incorporated

    nutrient management based

    on the SSNM approach into

    the curriculum for farmer

    field schools, and distributed

    50,000 leaf color charts to

    farmers and farmer groups in

    Vietnam. In August 2007, the

    impact of SSNM on farmer

    livelihoods was assessed

    throughhousehold

    surveys of

    more than

    250 fami-

    lies in Ha

    Nam and

    Ha Tay provinces. This

    was done through an in-

    dependent consultant in

    collaboration with Hanoi

    Agricultural University.

    In October 2005, through

    a planning meeting in Hanoi,the PSWG initiated research

    collaboration on integrated

    crop management at five loca-

    tions across Vietnam with the

    aim of better understanding

    the scientific principles for

    selecting the best possible

    combination of plant popu-

    lation, water management,

    and nutrient management to

    increase rice yield and profit

    in the major rice-growing

    areas of Vietnam. In 2006,

    two experiments were estab-

    lished on contrasting soils

    in the Red River Delta, two

    were established for contrast-

    ing rice-cropping systems in

    the Mekong Delta, and one

    experiment was established in

    Binh Dinh Province in central

    Vietnam. This research draws

    upon scientific principles

    established through research

    on healthy crop canopy inChina. The research find-

    ings are now (in late 2007)

    being interpreted and used to

    guide the identification of bes

    integrated crop, water, and

    nutrient management practi-

    ces for dissemination in 2008.

    In central Vietnam,

    activities to identify and

    disseminate improved crop

    and nutrient management

    In Vietnam, irrigated riceaccounts for 80% of the ricearea and is grown on about3.4 million hectares, adding tothe national production of 36million tons.

    The national integrated pest management program in Vietnamincorporated nutrient management based on the SSNM approach intothe curriculum for farmer field schools, and distributed 50,000 leafcolor charts to farmers and farmer groups in Vietnam. (PSWG photo)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    11/20Ripple October-December2007

    Tracing IRRC...from page 10

    practices have been carried

    out at a feverish pace since

    2005, through the coordina-

    tion of Dr. Tran Thi Thu Ha,

    professor at Hue University

    of Agriculture and Forestry.The project has been re-

    sponsible for catalyzing the

    formation, technical train-

    ing, and empowerment of

    farmer clubs as a vehicle for

    developing and disseminat-

    ing technologies. Diseases

    and insect pests and nutrient

    deficiencies associated with

    high seed rates for wet-seeded

    rice and unbalanced fertil-

    izer use have been identified

    as constraints. Activities tooptimize seed rate and ensure

    balanced fertilization through

    application of zinc fertilizer

    and the use of SSNM are

    implemented in farmers

    fields through two farmer

    clubs in Thua Thien Hue

    Province, two farmer clubs

    in Quang Nam Province, and

    one new farmer club in Binh

    Dinh Province. One of the

    achievements of the project

    has been the uptake of a new

    seed rate of 3 kg of seed/sao

    (60 kg of seed/hectare) as the

    new provincial recommenda-

    tion for wet-seeded rice in

    Quang Nam Province. Zinc

    deficiency is now increasingly

    recognized as a constraint

    to rice production, and some

    farmers using zinc with

    optimal seed rate and SSNM

    have even stopped applying

    insecticide and fungicidebecause insect and disease

    occurrences have declined.

    The project is now partnering

    with organizations to ensure

    a supply of zinc fertilizer at

    affordable costs to farmers.

    Scaling up ecologicallybased rodent pestmanagement

    Unfortunately, although

    some disease and insect

    incidence decreased with

    proper nutrient application,

    rats continue to reign as one

    of the top three pests in the

    country. Since 2001, scien-tists from IRRI, the Plant

    Protection Research Insti-

    tute (PPRI), the Institute for

    Agricultural Sciences, and

    Cuu Long Delta Rice Re-

    search Institute (CLRRI), in

    collaboration with extension

    staff from the Plant Protection

    Department (PPD) and World

    Vision Vietnam, and scien-

    tists from CSIRO, Australia,

    have been involved in farmer

    participatory action research.

    The integration of find-

    ings from social and natural

    sciences provided an excellent

    foundation to develop, refine,

    and promote ecologically

    based rodent pest manage-

    ment (EBRM) in Vietnam.

    A new project on sustainable

    implementation of EBRM was

    launched in February 2006

    to sustain the benefits gained

    from previous projects. Scal-ing-up of project activities

    to government and nongov-

    ernment organizations and

    institutions in other districts

    is the top prior ity for 2007,

    with dissemination to farmers

    set for 2008. Farmers in these

    provinces practice collec-

    tive action to control these

    pests, such as flooding rat

    burrows and setting up com-

    munity trap-barrier systems.

    Water management teambrings AWD to Vietnam

    And, speaking of flood-

    ing, water-saving activities

    continue to be a high prior-ity in Vietnam. The IRRC

    Water-Saving Work Group

    (WSWG) and its collabora-

    tors introduced safe alternate

    wetting and drying (AWD)

    in 2005 in An Giang through

    seminars and demonstration

    fields. The 161 farmers who

    used AWD in 2005 increased

    to 1,500 farmers (on 1,700

    hectares) in 2006. AWD

    farmers had, on average, two

    fewer pumping operations (to

    irrigate their fields) than the

    regular practice of continu-

    ous flooding, saving around

    US$13/hectare. Yields were

    also higher with AWD (5.63

    tons/hectare) than with the

    regular practice (5.36 tons/

    hectare). One reason for the

    higher yields was a decrease

    in lodging (rice plants falling

    over), which is often associ-

    ated with wet seeding. WithAWD, lodging was on aver-

    age 10%, whereas, with the

    standard practice, it was 19%.

    Lectures and seminars

    on water management and

    water-saving technologies

    have been held, and exten-

    sion materials in Vietnamese

    have been developed and

    distributed to participants.

    Plastic tubes used to moni-

    tor water depth in AWD

    fields have also been given to

    participants and farmers. The

    WSWG will work with the

    Consortium for Unfavorable

    Rice Environments to test and

    introduce AWD in the moun-

    tains of northern Vietnam.

    (See RIPPLE Vol. 2, No. 3.)

    Weed management workcombats shift in weedspecies

    About half of the rice

    area in the Mekong Delta is

    irrigated with three grow-

    ing seasons, and the crop is

    mainly direct-seeded. With

    direct seeding, reliance on

    herbicides is high, resulting in

    an undesirable shift in weed

    species and concern aboutenvironmental contamina-

    tion. The collaboration of

    the Labor Productivity Work

    Group (LPWG) with CLRRI

    has had a strong focus on

    changes in weed species and

    their population dynamics

    resulting from the transition

    to direct-seeded rice from

    transplanting. This work is

    continuing and is the fore-

    runner of similar projects

    in India and Bangladesh.

    The research collabora-

    tion on weeds has also

    involved the characterization

    of weedy rice, management

    strategies, and determining

    the potential for gene flow

    between domesticated and

    weedy rice varieties. Weedy

    rice was first detected in

    Vietnam in 1994. Recently,

    the LPWG began a study with

    the Plant Protection ResearchInstitute in northern Vietnam

    to examine the amount of

    herbicide contamination in

    drainage waters around rice

    areas. This is intended to pro

    vide some baseline studies

    that will help guide future

    practice and policies.Trina Mendoza

    Bas Bouman (b.bouman@cgiarorg), Roland Buresh, Martin

    Gummert, David Johnson, RubenLampayan (r.lampayan@cgiar

    org), and Grant Singleton

    On 3 May, Dr. Bas Bouman (IRRI), Dang Thanh Phong (provincial PlantProtection Department), and Le Quoc Cuong (PPD) organized a trainingcourse and workshop on water management and water-savingtechnologies hosted by the Northern Regional Plant Protection Centerin Hung Yen Province. (WSWG photo)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    12/20

    12Ripple October-December 2007

    Myanmar in motion

    Myanmar has indeed

    been a loyal

    comrade in the

    amazing journey the Irrigated

    Rice Research Consortium

    (IRRC) has trekked. It wasin Myanmar where the first

    Steering Committee meeting

    of the Phase 3 of IRRC took

    place back in September

    2005. The inaugural meeting

    was held to provide guidance

    and plan activities for the

    coming years of the IRRC.

    In her concluding remarks,

    Dr. Gelia Castillo, a Filipino

    national scientist and

    International Rice Research

    Institute (IRRI) consultant,said that the IRRC is not just

    about rice; it is as much about

    people and communities.

    A national planning

    meeting was also held in the

    same week, where senior

    planners and staff members

    of the Myanma Agriculture

    Service (MAS), the Depart-

    ment of Agricultural Research

    (DAR), the Irr igation Tech-

    nology Center, the Myanmar

    Rice and Paddy Traders

    Association (MRPTA), and

    Myanma Agricultural Pro-

    duce Training gathered for the

    first time to discuss con-

    straints to and challenges in

    rice production in Myanmar.

    To quickly start ad-

    dressing these rice-growing

    challenges in the country, the

    four IRRC work groups es-

    tablished common sites in the

    three major rice-growing divi-

    sions. Then, in January 2006,

    agricultural economists Are-

    lene Malabayabas (IRRC) andZenaida Huelgas (Internation-

    al Rice Research Institute)

    conducted a workshop on how

    to conduct a socioeconomic

    survey among MAS staff. In

    March and April, Ms. Mala-

    bayabas guided these staff in

    conducting a series of house-

    hold surveys, which will pro-

    vide baseline information for

    follow-up surveys in 2008.

    In the meantime, IRRC

    activities continued to takeplace rapidly in the country.

    Training courses on inte-

    grated weed management

    were held in March and

    October 2006 in Yangon by

    weed scientist Joel Janiya of

    the IRRC Labor Productiv-

    ity Work Group (LPWG). He

    discussed rice crop establish-

    ment methods and yield loss

    assessment, and introduced

    weed management and control

    methods. Mr. Janiya also

    trained 48 participants from

    MAS and the private sector

    on sampling and identifying

    weeds, preparing a herbari-

    um, calibrating sprayers, and

    calculating herbicide dosage.

    In 2006, MAS and the

    LPWG began working with

    farmers to explore options for

    crop estab-

    lishment

    and deter-

    mine losses

    caused by

    weeds in

    farmers

    fields insix town-

    ships. The

    average

    losses from

    weeds in

    these six areas ranged from

    3% to 32% in the summer

    season. Farmers also tested

    line seeding with a drum

    seeder and this was favored

    by farmers in some areas.

    The IRRC Postproduc-

    tion Work Group didntwaste precious time either.

    In April 2006, also in Yan-

    gon, the Work Group inte-

    grated e-learning for the first

    time, using computer-based

    courses packaged on CDs.

    Participants from MAS,

    MRPTA, and the Myanmar

    Rice Millers Association

    learned about postharvest

    theories through the e-learn-

    ing course. The following

    day, Work Group leader and

    postharvest development

    specialist Martin Gummert

    gave lectures on drying

    systems, storage, milling,

    and grain and seed quality.

    That same month, a train-

    ing activity on laser land lev-

    eling in rice production was

    held in West Bago, a collabor-

    ative effort among the IRRC,

    MAS, and the MRPTA. The

    MRPTA, a private organiza-tion, has been very supportive

    of IRRC activities. From

    November 2005 to 2006,

    the MRPTA and the IRRC

    conducted a market survey to

    study price trends and factors

    determining them, fluctua-

    tions, and consumers prefer-

    ences in choosing rice variet-

    ies. And, as a result of a dryer

    training in Vietnam in 2005,

    the MRPTA has installed

    more than 24 dr yers for seven

    farmers groups and rice

    mills since February 2006.

    Water-saving activities

    have also been making waves

    in the golden land of Bud-

    dhist temples. Demonstration

    sites of alternate wetting anddrying (AWD) and aerobic

    rice have been established in

    Ayeyarwaddy, West Bago,

    Sagaing, and Mandalay.

    Water scientist and IRRC

    Water-Saving Work Group

    leader Ruben Lampayan

    happily reported that, after a

    year, areas with scarce water

    resources such as central and

    upper Myanmar showed high

    potential in adopting AWD

    and aerobic rice varieties.

    (See RIPPLE Vol. 2, No. 3.)

    Myanma farmers have

    also been getting their hands

    dirty learning about nutrients

    and mat nurseries from soil

    scientist Marianne Samson of

    the IRRC Productivity and

    Sustainability Work Group

    (PSWG). She visited Myan-

    mar three times in 2006 and

    once in 2007 to examine

    collaborative activities andtrain research and extension

    staff on using site-specific

    nutrient management (SSNM)

    and preparing a modified mat

    nursery (See RIPPLE Vol. 1,

    No. 3).

    Guidelines were devel-

    oped for a modified SSNM

    practice with optimal use of

    low fertilizer inputs tailored

    > continued on page 13

    Staff from the Myanma Agriculture Service and the private sectorattended two training courses in 2006 on integrated weed manage-ment held by the LPWG. (Photo by J. Janiya)

    The PPWG first tested its postharvest e-learningcourse in Myanmar in April 2006, followed by hands-on training on drying systems, storage, milling, andgrain and seed quality. (Photo by G. Claessens)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    13/20Ripple October-December2007

    to local conditions. This

    SSNM practice was evaluated

    and disseminated in 2006-07

    through on-farm trials in 14

    townships across major rice-

    growing areas of the country.A booklet on SSNM for rice

    was translated and published

    in 2007. The PSWG continued

    to integrate SSNM with

    component technologies for

    improved crop establishment.

    Local partners are being

    trained on improved crop and

    nutrient management by the

    PSWG.

    Myanmar...from page 12 And it doesnt stop there.

    All four IRRC work groups

    are now working together and

    planning to develop dem-

    onstration sites featuring a

    combination of technologies.

    These activities are being

    coordinated nationally by the

    IRRC Myanmar Outreach

    Program, led by U Hla Myo,

    general manager of the MAS

    Extension Division, and U

    Than Aye, deputy director

    general of the Agricultural

    Planning Department. At

    the state and division levels,

    these technologies will be

    carried out by the private

    sector (through the MRPTA)

    and new farmer associations.

    Myanma leadership

    and the IRRC have already

    plotted out the 2008 game-

    plan. In a February 2007

    workshop between IRRC

    and MAS, current structures

    in the research-extension

    interface were reviewed, and

    seven recommendations were

    developed for consideration

    of the director general of

    agricultural planning. The

    workshop aimed to develop

    a better understanding ofpathways whereby mature

    technologies can be shared

    with farmers in 2008.

    From the looks of things,

    the Myanmar-IRRC tandem is

    on the right track.

    Trina Mendoza, DavidJohnson, and Roland Buresh

    Irrigated rice in Myanmar is cultivated on about3.2 million hectares, which is half of thenational rice production area. It contributes toa national production of 20 million tons.

    Intensive production gains in India

    Rice is the staple food

    of about 65% of

    the total population

    in India, the second most

    populous country in the

    world. But, like many rice-

    growing countries, farmers

    in India have problems with

    water scarcity, weeds, and

    nutrient management.

    The promise of aerobicrice

    Signs of water scarcity

    are already evident in Indias

    agricultural areas. Because of

    overpumping of groundwater

    for agriculture and household

    use, the water table (top layer

    of groundwater) is dropping

    and thus greatly affecting

    the long-term sustainabil-

    ity of water resources forfood production. With the

    alarming threat of water

    scarcity, scientists from the

    International Rice Research

    Institute (IRRI) and national

    partners have begun research

    activities on aerobic rice

    with farmers to solve this

    problem. The Irrigated Rice

    Research Consortium (IRRC)

    and the Challenge Program

    on Water and Food (CPWF)

    are two programs that sup-

    port research activities in

    India through the Water

    Technology Centre (WTC)

    of the Indian Agricultural

    Research Institute (IARI).

    The WTC has been

    working with farmers in

    Bulandshar, Uttar Pradesh,

    where they use a rice-wheat

    cropping system. During

    the wet season, they test the

    performance of potential

    aerobic rice varieties. They

    choose varieties based on

    yield, water savings, and

    farmers preference (which

    includes eating quality and

    marketability of the variety).

    Pusa Sugandh 3 and Pusa

    Rice Hybrid 10 were variet-

    ies that performed well under

    aerobic conditions in the ex-periment field. Water savings

    of about 60% were observed

    and yields rivaled that of

    puddled transplanted paddy.

    However, farmers who tried

    growing aerobic rice usually

    encountered weed problems.

    Benefits of direct seedingSystems of transplanting

    rice into puddled fields give

    rice a size advantage over any

    germinating weeds, and the

    subsequent flooding of the

    soil suppresses most weed

    growth. Transplanting,

    however, requires substantial

    labor, and, as labor increases,

    direct seeding of rice offers

    an alternative. Weeds are a

    major constraint to direct

    seeding, as rice and weedsemerge together. High yield

    losses may occur if control

    measures are not effective. In

    direct-seeded rice, dry rice

    seeds can be sown directly

    into dry or moist nonpuddled

    soil (dry direct seeding as

    used in aerobic rice) or

    pregerminated rice seeds can

    be sown into puddled soil (wet

    direct seeding).

    In India, concern about

    the sustainability of rice

    production systems has been

    raised due to the impact of

    puddling on the soil structure

    and groundwater depletion

    caused by pumping for

    irrigation. Dry direct seeding

    can address some of these

    concerns. Options with either

    conventional dry tillage orzero tillage (no cultivation)

    have been developed with

    farmers and researchers and

    are being promoted by the

    IRRC Labor Productivity

    Work Group (LPWG) and its

    partners in rice-wheat areas.

    Studies by the LPWG

    showed that crop performance

    and weed populations are

    affected by different crop> continued on page 14

    Behind the farmers is Apo variety, a promising aerobicrice variety that was planted in October 2006 and isperforming well in Indian soil. (Photo by C. Kreye)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    14/20

    14Ripple October-December 2007

    establishment and weed

    management practices. Rice

    yield with direct seeding

    can be achieved that is as

    good as or better than that

    of transplanted rice, butgreater attention needs to be

    given to weed management.

    Many farmers are now

    testing direct seeding and

    gaining confidence with the

    options. In Uttarakhand,

    where the work started in

    2002, only a few fields were

    directly seeded. Now, in 2007,

    more than 100 farmers are

    growing direct-seeded rice.

    Farmers see quick, visible

    eco-nomic

    ben-

    efits.

    Direct

    seed-

    ing

    can also save 20% of the

    overall labor needed for

    transplanting and reduce

    irrigation costs by 30%.

    Further, direct-seeded rice

    can mature 1015 days ear-

    lier than a transplanted crop,

    which allows earlier sowing

    of wheat and higher yields.

    Wet direct seeding also

    helped farmers in West

    Bengal who were severely

    affected by flooding this year.

    Farmers were able to establish

    rice by wet direct seeding

    after their transplanted rice

    and nurseries were lost to the

    flood waters. Many of these

    areas were resown with someof the drum seeders that had

    been recently distributed

    through projects and non-

    government organizations.

    Researchers are now

    working with farmers who are

    direct seeding to gain a great-

    er understanding of their in-

    formation needs and decision-

    making, which will guide the

    development of information

    sources and enable constraints

    Intensive ...from page 13 to be overcome. Research-

    ers are also monitoring the

    changes in weed species that

    occur in farmers fields and

    in experiments to identify po-

    tential threats and anticipate

    difficulties in future work.

    Gains in nutrient andcrop management

    Low soil fertility is

    widespread in irrigated rice

    areas of India as a result of

    long-term intensive cultiva-

    tion with imbalanced use of

    nutrient inputs, resulting in

    the mining of some essential

    nutrients from the soil and

    the depletion of soil fertil ity.

    Research on the development

    andevalua-

    tion of

    site-

    specific

    nutrient

    man-

    agement (SSNM) started in

    the Cauvery Delta of Tamil

    Nadu in collaboration with

    Tamil Nadu Agricultural

    University (TNAU) in the

    mid-1990s. In the late 1990s,

    the research expanded to the

    rice-wheat system in northern

    India through collaboration

    with GB Pant University of

    Agriculture & Technology.

    On-farm trials conducted

    in the Cauvery Delta from

    2001 to 2004 confirmed

    consistent increases in grain

    yield and profit with the use

    of locally adapted SSNM

    practices compared with the

    existing fertilizer practices

    of farmers. SSNM included

    reduced use of nitrogen (N)fertilizer within 2 weeks

    after transplanting when crop

    growth was slow and the

    need for N was small; better

    matching of N fertilizer use

    within the growing season

    to the needs of the crop for

    supplemental N as determined

    with a leaf color chart (LCC);

    and application of phosphorus

    (P) and potassium (K) fertil-

    izer tailored to the location-

    specific needs of the crop.In trials across 25 farmers

    fields for four seasons, the

    improved management of N

    alone increased net profit by

    US$4868/hectare/crop in

    the Old Cauvery Delta and by

    $3233 in the New Cauvery

    Delta. The research clearly

    showed that the existing K

    fertilizer recommendation

    and use by farmers were in-

    sufficient in the New Cauvery

    Delta. Further increasing

    K fertilizer use increased

    profit by $36/hectare/crop

    in the New Cauvery Delta.

    Focused group dis-

    cussions with SSNM and

    non-SSNM farmers in the

    Cauvery Delta revealed sig-

    nificantly less pesticide use

    by SSNM farmers. SSNM did

    not reduce the costs for fertil-

    izer or labor, but it markedly

    altered the timing of N fertil-

    izer and increased the use of

    K fertilizer. The annual netfinancial benefit for the two

    rice seasons per year aver-

    aged $168/hectare higher for

    SSNM farmers, largely be-

    cause of increased rice yields.

    Locally adapted SSNM

    practices continued to be

    promoted by TNAU from

    2005. During 2005-06, 295

    demonstration trials were

    conducted in farmers fields

    across the Cauvery Delta.

    The grain yield increasebecause of SSNM ranged

    from 0.34 to 1.07 tons/hect-

    are, with an average of 0.75

    ton/hectare. Farmers real-

    ized additional profits of

    $50140/hectare per season.

    Meanwhile, the needs

    for N, K, and sulfur (S)

    continued to be assessed in

    farmers fields across north-

    ern India. Collaboration

    was established with Punjab

    Agricultural University in

    2007 to formulate options

    that give farmers greater

    flexibility in implementing

    improved N management.

    The PSWG aims to

    increase awareness of the

    SSNM approach and the

    opportunities it provides for

    tailoring fertilizer use to

    field-specific needs of rice;

    ensuring use of N, P, K, and

    S in optional amounts andratios; and reducing the oc-

    currence and development of

    rice diseases and insect pests.

    A second edition ofRice: a

    practical guide to nutrient

    managementwas published

    in 2007. It will be translated

    for distribution in India.

    Trina Mendoza, DavidJohnson, and Roland Buresh

    India has the largest rice area of anycountry in the world. Its irrigated riceaccounts for 54% of the national ricearea, which is about 24 million hectares.Each year, irrigated rice contributes tothe countrys rice production of 72.66million tons.

    SSNM in the Cauvery Delta reduced the incidence of pests anddiseases for rice. Through demonstration trials in 2005-06, farmersrealized added profits of US$50-140 per hectare per season, about$100 per hectare per season using SSNM. (Photo by R. Rajendran)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    15/20Ripple October-December2007

    > continued on page 16

    Strengthening ties with Indonesia

    O

    ver the past decade,

    the Irrigated Rice

    Research Consortium

    (IRRC) has developedstrong partnerships with

    national agricultural research

    and extension systems

    (NARES) in Indonesia. It

    currently has collaborative

    research on postproduction,

    nutrient management,

    crop establishment,

    and ecologically based

    management of weeds

    and rodents. Research

    on water management is

    planned to begin in 2008.

    The development of

    mature technologies in site-

    specific nutrient management

    (SSNM), postproduction, and

    rodent management formed

    the foundation for the devel-

    opment of an IRRC Country

    Outreach Program (ICOP) in

    December 2006. The ICOP

    is a national initiative led by

    the Indonesian Center for

    Agricultural Technology andDevelopment (ICATAD; has

    national mandate for valida-

    tion and subsequent extension

    of new agricultural tech-

    nologies) and the Indonesian

    Center for Rice Research

    (ICRR; has national mandate

    for research and knowledge

    management on rice). The

    ICOP has provided a focal

    point for the IRRC to respond

    to, and link with, initiatives

    by the government of Indone-

    sia such as the development

    of agricultural business units

    at district levels throughoutIndonesia as an entry point

    for demonstrations of new

    technologies (Prima Tani) and

    the national Rice Production

    Increase Program (P2BN).

    The IRRC has played a

    pivotal role in two national

    initiatives developed in 2007.

    The first is on the dissemina-

    tion of SSNM through the

    development of a technical

    team with a mandate for

    facilitating the dissemination

    of SSNM for rice within the

    framework of integrated crop

    management. This is an

    exciting initiative that

    includes ICRR and ICATAD

    with the IRRC Productivity

    and Sustainability Work

    Group leader, Dr. Roland

    Buresh, as an advisor. It

    builds on a Ministry of

    Agriculture decree for the

    national extension of site-specific fertilization of rice

    announced in 2006. The

    technical team will oversee

    the following activities:

    (i) development of

    promotional materials in the

    local language for a standard

    SSNM recommendation for

    rice;

    (ii) demonstration and

    elaboration of the SSNM

    approach in major rice-grow-

    ing provinces (especially

    West Java, Central Java, East

    Java, North Sumatra, and

    South Sulawesi) throughthe Prima Tani initiative;

    (iii) working through the

    Assessment Institutes for

    Agricultural Technologies

    (AIAT) at the provincial and

    district levels, and the local

    agricultural government

    agencies (e.g., Dinas Perta-

    nian) in all major rice-

    growing

    provinces to

    develop

    guidelines

    and training

    materials

    harmonized

    to province-

    and distr ict-level needs.

    The second initiative

    was the holding of a national

    workshop on hermetic stor-

    age, which led to the develop-

    ment of an expert team with

    a national focus. The IRRC

    Postproduction Work Groupleader Martin Gummert is an

    advisor to this expert team.

    In addition to these

    national initiatives, provin-

    cial initiatives that have an

    adaptive research focus have

    been established. This is a

    bottom-up approach, in which

    researchers and extension

    agencies have developed a

    program of activities based

    on the important needs of and

    constraints to rice production

    identified by farmer groups.

    New projects in South Su-

    matera, South Sulawesi, and

    Southeast Sulawesi facilitate

    learning and adaptive man-

    agement for irrigated rice.

    The IRRC aims to increaseefficiency of rice production

    by 10% through matching

    crop management technolo-

    gies with farmers needs.

    Given the variability in

    the biophysical and social en-

    vironment across the provinc-

    es, a necessary precursor to

    adoption is that the adaptive

    integrated crop management

    package be flexible enough to

    meet the needs and require-

    ments of local farmers, butstill general enough to allow

    future scaling out for sustain-

    able and widespread adoption

    Using a social anthropologica

    platform, we will develop a

    strong understanding of the

    economic, social, and cul-

    tural factors that influence the

    farm-level adoption process.

    An important

    output of

    these stud-

    ies will be

    the identi-

    fication of

    technological

    limitations

    that affect the adoption and

    adaptation of technologies.

    This approach has

    required the assembly of

    multistakeholder teams that

    span research to extension

    at the provincial level, to

    extension and outreach at thesubdistrict orkabupaten level

    The team includes research-

    ers from the ICRR, IRRI, and

    local universities, extension

    specialists from AIATs and

    Dinas Pertanian in each of

    the provincial headquarters,

    and extension staff at the

    district and subdistrict levels.

    In Indonesia, irrigated riceaccounts for 61.75% of the

    national rice area, cultivatedon about 4.8 million hectares.It adds to the countrys riceproduction of 54.45 milliontons.

    About 30,000 people attended the national farmers field day in Julyin Palembang, where IRRC technologies were on display.

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    16/20

    16Ripple October-December 2007

    Strengthening ties...from page 15

    The lead technologies

    are direct seeding, nutrient

    management, hermetic grain

    storage to reduce postharvest

    losses and maintain grain

    quality, and ecologicallybased weed and rodent man-

    agement. Water management

    technologies such as alternate

    wetting and drying are in

    their infancy in Indonesia.

    Plans are in place to develop

    field trials to validate this

    technology in those prov-

    inces where water availabil-

    ity is a major constraint.

    Ecologically based rodentmanagementIndonesiais a leader in SE Asia

    Rodents are the number-

    one preharvest pest in

    Indonesia. Losses on average

    are 17% per year. To put this

    into perspect ive, a loss of 17%amounts to enough rice to

    feed 25 million people for a

    year. The ICRR rodent

    laboratory is a leader in

    rodent management in

    Southeast Asia. Through

    linkages with IRRI and

    scientists in Australia, they

    have developed a good

    understanding of the popula-

    tion ecology of

    specific rodent

    species, leading

    to effective

    community

    methods of

    control that are

    simple to applyand environment-

    friendly. Village-

    scale field trials

    in the lowland

    irrigated rice

    crops in Java in Indonesia

    resulted in a 50% reduction in

    the use of chemical rodenti-

    cides and increased yields by

    about 0.5 ton/hectare. The

    ICRR rodent specialists are

    linking with the IRRC in the

    adaptive research projects in

    Sumatra and Sulawesi.

    Story and photosby Grant Singleton

    Work groups pushforward in China

    Although China is the

    worlds largest rice

    producer, accounting

    for 3235% of total world

    production, it is also the

    most populous country in

    the world, with about 13

    million people added to the

    population each year. Two of

    the countrys main concerns

    in rice production nationally

    are how to increase rice

    productivity to ensure the

    nations food security and

    how to find varieties that

    can cope with the looming

    water shortage. The Irrigated

    Rice Research Consortium

    (IRRC) has two work

    groups in place in China tohelp national partners find

    solutions to these problems.

    Taking fertile steps toproductivity andsustainability

    Farmers in China com-

    monly use high rates of

    nitrogen (N) fertilizer, which

    is usually not used efficiently

    by the crop. The high use of

    N fertilizer often results in

    luxuriant vegetative growth,

    which can increase the sus-

    ceptibility of rice to diseases

    and insect pests and lead to

    high use of fungicides and

    pesticides. The excess N could

    also leak as a contaminant

    into water bodies and escape

    to the atmosphere as nitrous

    oxide, a greenhouse gas.

    Research on the devel-

    opment and evaluation of

    site-specific nutrient manage-

    ment (SSNM) for rice began

    in 1997 in collaboration with

    Professor Guanghuo Wang at

    Zhejiang University. Based

    on the promising results,

    research on SSNM started

    in 2001 in Jiangsu, Hunan,and Guangdong provinces,

    and later started in Hubei

    and Heilongjiang provinces.

    After 2 years of experi-

    ments in Jiangsu, Hunan, and

    Guangdong, SSNM was

    shown to be superior to

    farmers traditional fertilizer

    practices, producing 510%

    more grain yield with 2030%

    less N fertilizer. Disease and

    insect incidence was lower,

    especially for leaf roller,

    sheath blight, and brown

    planthopper, and pesticide

    use could be reduced. Lodg-

    ing, or rice plants falling

    over, also decreased.

    In 2003 and 2004, Profes-

    sor Ruifa Hu of the Center for

    Chinese Agricultural Policy

    (CCAP), Chinese Academy

    of Sciences, collaborated

    with partners in Guangdong,

    Hunan, Hubei, and Jiangsuin farmer participatory

    research for on-farm testing

    of improved N fertilization

    in 14 villages. Among 514

    farmers, 95% were willing

    to adopt either a standard

    or locally modified SSNM,

    while 76% were willing to

    conduct experiments using

    either of the technologies.

    As compared with tradi-

    tional fertilizer practices,

    SSNM and modified SSNM

    raised yields slightly by 0.2

    ton/hectare using signifi-

    cantly less N fertilizer and no

    increase in labor input.

    The extension of SSNM

    continues across six provinces

    through partnerships within

    the provinces. In addition, the

    principles of SSNM for rice

    were incorporated into a na-

    tional initiative on improved

    fertilization led by ProfessorZhang Fusuo at China Agri-

    cultural University (CAU),

    and which included partners

    working on SSNM from the

    six provinces. The Productiv-

    ity and Sustainability Work

    Group (PSWG) continues to

    collaborate with CCAP and

    CAU in building harmoniza-

    tion on improved nutrient

    > continued on page 17

    Dr. Shaobing Peng (left),an IRRI crop physiologist,is a major contributor tothe introduction andspread of SSNM in China.(Photo by NongrongHuang)

  • 8/2/2019 Ripple Oct Dec 2007

    17/20Ripple October-December2007

    conducted in 1999-2000 at

    sites in irrigated lowland ar-

    eas in China (Hubei) and the

    Philippines (Nueva Ecija) tocompare continuously flooded

    fields with AWD fields. By

    keeping the rice field alter-

    nately flooded and drained,

    5387 millimeters (1316%)

    of irrigation water was saved

    without affecting grain yield

    significantly (7.2 to 8.7 tons/

    hectare). Water productivity

    was significantly higher in

    AWD conditions than in the

    flooded field in two out of

    three experiments, indicating

    higher resource-use efficiency

    of water. (For more on aero-

    bic rice and AWD in China,

    read RIPPLE Vol. 2, No.3.)

    With SSNM, aerobic rice

    and AWD, rice product ion in

    China has better chances of

    increasing yields to meet the

    growing consumption

    demand.Trina Mendoza

    Bas Bouman, and Roland Buresh

    are, compared with $442 for

    flooded rice, $301 for maize,

    $133 for soybean, $715 for

    peanut, and $652 for cotton.When water is too scarce to

    grow flooded rice, aerobic

    rice was an attractive option

    and yield targets of 6 tons/

    hectare were most common.

    The driving forces behind the

    adoption of aerobic rice are

    farmers wishes to grow their

    own rice and labor shortage

    (aerobic rice requires less

    labor than flooded rice).

    In the temperate climate

    of northern China, IRRC

    research focuses on improved

    management practices,

    characterizing and mapping

    extrapolation domains, and

    impact assessment. More

    studies are needed on im-

    pact and adoption to identify

    suitable target domains.

    AWD is a common water

    management practice in

    China. Field experiments were

    Team

    EDITORIAL AND PRODUCTION TEAM:Cover photo: Grant SingletonIRRC: Trina Leah Mendoza, Grant Singleton, Jennifer Hernandez, Rica FlorCPS: Tess Rola, Bill Hardy, George Reyes, Juan Lazaro IV, Manny Panisales

    CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Bas Bouman, Roland Buresh, Martin Gummert, JoelJaniya, David Johnson, Ruben Lampayan, Marianne Samson

    Farmers appreciated the low productioncosts, resistance to water scarcity, andgood eating quality, but expressedconcerns over lower yields, weedinfestation, and marketability.(Photo by B. Bouman)

    In China, irrigated riceaccounts for 93% of thenational rice area and isgrown on about 26.4 millionhectares, adding to thenational produ