rev 1 to wps-1000-88-010, 'kewaunee nuclear power plant ...igen ngineering, inc kewaunee...
TRANSCRIPT
IGEN NGINEERING, INC
KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SPDS DESIGN REVIEW REPORT
WPS-1000-88-010, Rev. 1
October 6, 1988
Prepared for
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
Prepared by
EIGEN Engineering, Inc. San Jose, CA
Reviewed by:
A; I
Ken V. Allen, P.E. Project Engineer
"Joseph D. Doyel, O.E. Project Manager
8909060304 890901. PDR ADOCK 05000305 P PDC
3150 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY. SUITE 233 * SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95118 * (408) 978-8113
Allm-11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . .* * * *
1.1 Purpose . . * * * * * 1.2 Design Review Methodology
2.0 CONCLUSIONS . . . . * *.***
3.0 SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS REVIEW
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12
* * * * * . ... 1
* . , . . . . .
* S 0 0 0 S * S
1 2
* * * * * * * . . 4
. . . . . . . . &
Display Content and Format * * Data Scan Intervals . . . * * * Scale Optimization * * * * Data Validation . * * . * SPDS Operability . * * * * Electrical Isolation . . . * * . Configuration Control . . . . . Reliability . . . . . . . . . . Location . * * * * * * .Procedures and Training . Human Factors . . . . .. System Operation and Maintenance
4.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . .
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
1
. . . . S . .
6
6 23 27 38 44 46 48 50 51 56 59 61
63
- Reference Documents
- Discrepancies
3
4
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
- Instructions for the Verification of SPDS Composed Points
- Verification of SAS Documentation Checklists
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
i
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) is one of several emergency response facilities called for in NUREG 0696. NUREG 0737 specifies SPDS as a requirement for all operating nuclear power plants. NSAC 39 requires an independent Verification and Validation program as part of the implementation of the SPDS. The Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant SPDS Verification and Validation Program Plan (Ref 4.1) describes a V&V program which addresses System Requirements, Design Review, Performance Validation, and Field Verification of the Kewaunee SPDS.
The purpose of this report is to document the results of the Design Review phase of the V&V program.
System Requirements have been identified and are included in the V&V Plan. Performance Validation and Field Verification will be accomplished during simulator Dynamic Testing and the Field Installation Audit.
Typically, the V&V of a computer system is an integral part of the specification, design, and installation phases of the project. This approach generally minimizes the impact of problem resolution since problems can be identified and corrected prior to the implementation of the system.
The Kewaunee SPDS is a plant-specific derivation of a generic PWR Safety Assessment System (SAS) provided to several operating PWRs. The generic SAS was modified by Wisconsin Public Service to; operate on the Honeywell 45000 plant process computer, and reconfigure the four loop generic design to a two loop plant specific design.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 1 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
The NRC post implementation audit report of January 1987 (Ref. 4.2) identified several areas of concern and concluded that the system did not meet the requirements of NUREG-0737, Supplement 1 (Ref. 4.3).
In January, 1988, Eigen Engineering was contracted to perform a Verification and Validation program on the Kewaunee SPDS.
Since the system was already installed and operational, and consisted of hardware and software components from suppliers having extensive industry experience, no attempt was made to validate the basic design of the system. Instead, the V&V program was concentrated on evaluating how well the final system configuration and performance met the system requirements.
1.2 Design Review Methodology
The objective of the design review was to ascertain that the implementation of system requirements into hardware and software is complete and without ambiguity.
As described in the V&V Program Plan, the design review began with identification of the task(s) necessary to evaluate the system with respect to each requirement, and a description of the documentation necessary to perform each evaluation.
A documentation related deficiency was encountered when the V&V team attempted to confirm actual data manipulation techniques such as engineering unit conversions and data validation algorithms.
Since no formal documentation was available to document how
each displayed variable was generated from raw input data and
how these variables would behave under different input
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2 WPS-looo-88-010 REV. 1
conditions, Eigen Engineering obtained the SAS computer code listings and developed documentation, which identified;
- actual calculations performed on raw data to generate all displayed variables.
- logic governing the behavior of each display feature on the CRT screen (i.e. - alarm limits).
- all constants, and alarm limits used in display development.
This documentation was included in the Kewaunee SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 4.4) which constitutes the complete basis for the V&V team's verification of all data manipulation and validation techniques employed by the Kewaunee SPDS. Attachment 1 to this report identifies all Kewaunee SPDS documents used during the review process.
Many of the attributes specified by the various requirements of the V&V program were reviewed at the same time. In order to consistently review these attributes, a checklist and a set of instructions was developed. The instructions are included in Attachment 3 and copies of the checklists are included in Attachment 4.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 3 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
I
2.0 CONCLUSIONS
During the course of the design review, the V&V team identified a total of 94 discrepancies (see Appendix 2).
Based on additional documentation received from WPS, 74 of these have been resolved and closed.
Of the remaining 20 discrepancies, most can be resolved by making minor revisions to existing system software or plant documentation.
The major system deficiencies appear to be
- lack of documentation verifying human factors evaluation of the plant specific modifications to the generic SAS. (discrepancy #14)
- lack of documentation demonstrating a high level of system reliability. (discrepancy #13)
- lack of data validation as defined in the Design Document Package. (discrepancy #46)
- two parameters (Intermediate Range and Source Range start up rate) were identified as providing the status of critical safety functions. Sensors providing this information are not currently connected to the system. (discrepancies 11 and #15)
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 4 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
.
I
In general, the V&V team feels that the basic.concept of the Kewaunee SPDS is adequate and that with some additional effort the system will satisfy the requirements of Supplement 1 to NUREG 0737.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 5 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.0 SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS REVIEW
3.1 Display Content and Format
3.1.1 Requirement: This SPDS should -provide a predetermined minimum set of critical plant variables to help the control room operators evaluate plant safety. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.2.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (KNPP) Safety Analysis Report for Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) and WPS letters providing additional information for the selection of the SPDS variable set.
Review SPDS design document package for the proper implementation of the variables.
B. Summary: Selection of the minimum SPDS parameter set was based on the parameters used to demonstrate the generic Safety Assessment System (SAS) at the Indian Point Unit 2 Nuclear Plant Simulator. The generic four loop parameter set was modified to a two loop configuration for Kewaunee and additional parameters (Hot Leg Temperatures, Auxiliary Feedwater Flow and Charging minus Letdown Flow) were added to the top level displays.
The Kewaunee parameter selection is discussed in detail in Section 3.1.2.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 6 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211), Section 6.0.
Safety Analysis Report, (Ref. 11)
Letter (NRC-84-123) from D. C. Hintz to D. G. Eisenhut (Ref. 12)
Letter (NRC-85-84) from D. C. Hintz to D. G. Eisenhut (Ref. 210)
Quadrex Functional Design Specification, (Ref. 8) page IV-23 and Appendix A.
Lesson Plan T-STA-SP 2.13.4, (Ref. 218) Section IV, Handout #6 thru 12.
Letter (SASLOG-118) from J. B. Moritz (Quadrex) to SAS Distribution. (Ref. 74)
Video copies of Kewaunee displays dated Sept. 22, 1986 (Ref. 202)
D. Conclusion:
The SPDS parameter set satisfactorily meets the requirement of a predetermined minimum set of critical plant parameters.
This item is considered closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 7 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.1.2 Requirement: The minimum information to be provided should be sufficient to provide information to the plant operators about: reactivity control, reactor core cooling and heat removal, coolant system -integrity, radioactivity control, and containment conditions. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.5)
A. Verification Task(s): Verify that the SPDS critical parameters envelope / address the required Critical Safety Functions (CSF) and associated control functions have been included in the identification of the SPDS variable set. Review the resulting display formats to ensure that the minimum required information is displayed. Also review the method used to provide access to the above minimum information.
B. Summary: WPS letter NRC-84-123 provides a discussion of the parameters selected to monitor each of the Critical Safety Functions (CSF). The SPDS design document package presents the following safety function correlation:
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 8 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
SAS CRITICAL SAFETY FUNCTIONS AND ASSOCIATEDMONITORED AND DISPLAYED PARAMETERS
CRITICAL SAFETY FUNCTION
Reactivity Control
Core Cooling & Primary System Heat Removal
Coolant System Integrity
DISPLAYED PARAMETER
Rx Power (SRIR,PR)
Rx Trip Status
Rx Vessel Level/Void Fraction
Przr Level Core Exit Temp. Cold Leg Temp. Rx Coolant Avg Temp.
*Rx Coolant Pump Status Subcooling
S/G Level S/G Pressure Aux. FW Flow S/G Steam Flow RHR System Flow RHR HX Inlet Temp.
RHR HX Outlet Temp.
Rx Coolant Sys Press.
Rx Coolant Avg Temp.
Cold Leg Temp. Rx Vessel Level Przr Level Cntmt Rad. Cntmt Press. Cntmt Sump Level S/G Blowdown Rad.
Condenser Air Ejector Rad.
MONITORED PARAMETER
(SR, IR & PR Monitor)
Rx Trip Status
Rx Vessel Level/ RCP Status Przr Level Core Exit Temp. Cold Leg Temp. Hot Leg Temp. & Cold Leg Temp.
*Rx Coolant Loop Flow
Core Exit Temp. & Coolant Press. S/G Level S/G Pressure Aux. FW Flow S/G Steam Flow RHR System Flow RHR HX Inlet Temp. RHR HX Outlet Temp.
Rx Coolant Loop Press & Pressurizer Press. Cold Leg Temp. & Hot Leg Temp.
Cold Leg Temp. Rx Vessel Level Przr Level Cntmt Rad. Cntmt Press. Cntmt Sump Level S/G Blowdown Rad.
Condenser Air Ejector Rad.
*indirectly indicated
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 9 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
SAS CRITICAL SAFETY FUNCTIONS AND ASSOCIATEDMONITORED AND DISPLAYED PARAMETERS
CRITICAL SAFETY FUNCTION
Containment Conditions
Radioactivity Control
DISPLAYED PARAMETER
Cntmt Pressure Cntmt Sump Level Cntmt Radiation
Aux Bldg Vent Stack Rad Cntmt Radiation S/G Blowdown Rad.
Cond Air Ejector Rad.
MONITORED PARAMETER
Cntmt Pressure Cntmt Sump Level Cntmt Radiation
Aux Bldg Vent Stack Rad
Cntmt Radiation S/G Blowdown Rad. Cond Air Ejector Rad.
As described in the Design Document Package, the SPDS
will display either Reactor Vessel Level or Void
Fraction depending on Reactor Coolant Pump Status
(running or stopped). The parameter displayed (Level or Void Fraction) is therefore the method by which Coolant Pump status is indicated.
The KNPP Integrated Plant Emergency Operating Procedures (F-series) provide flow diagrams to direct operator
response to CSF alarms (except radioactivity control).
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 6.0
Letter (NRC-84-123) from D.C. Hintz to D.G.
Eisenhut (Ref. 12)
Letter (NRC-85-84) from D. C. Hintz to D. G.
Eisenhut (Ref. 210)
Lesson Plan T-SLA-LP 2.13.4, (Ref. 218),
Section III, Handout #3.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 10 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
D. Conclusion: The parameters necessary to provide the necessary information about each critical safety function are available in
the SPDS.
3.1.3 Requirement: The display should contain the minimum set of indicators and data needed to assess the plant functions that are used to determine the plant's safety status. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.5.1.2)
A. Verification Task(s): Review KNPP IPEOP's to ensure that CSF EOP decision points are supported by the display features.
B. Summary: Discrepancy #11 results from CSF. EOP F-0.1 which requires a decision based on Intermediate Range startup rate below -0.2 DPM. This is a "Future" input and i's not connected at this time.
Discrepancy #15 results from CSF EOP F-0.1 which requires a decision based on source range startup rate. This parameter is not part of the SPDS parameter set.
Discrepancy #9 results from CSF EOP F-0.2 which requires a decision based on core subcooling being above or below 120 0F. The display range on both trend graphs showing this parameter is from 100oF subcooling to
50oF superheat.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 11 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Discrepancy #8 results from CSF EOP F-0.2 which requires a decision based on a core exit temperature of 700 0 F. The Design Document Package shows the core exit thermocouples process range as -100 to
+100 0 F. This range is inadequate to support the EOP.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211), Section 6.0.
Safety Analysis Report, (Ref. 11)
Letter (NRC-84-123) from D. C. Hintz to D. G. Eisenhut (Ref. 12)
Letter (NRC-85-84) from D. C. Hintz to D. G. Eisenhut (Ref. 210)
Quadrex Functional Design Specification,
(Ref. 8) page IV-23 and Appendix A. Lesson Plan T-STA-SP 2.13.4, (Ref. 218)
Section IV, Handout #6 thru 12. Letter (SASLOG-118) from J. B. Moritz
(Quadrex) to SAS Distribution. (Ref. 74) Video copies of Kewaunee displays (Ref. 202)
D. Conclusion: This item is open pending
resolution of discrepancies 8, 9, 11 and 15.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 12 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.1.4 Requirement: The SPDS Oser is made aware of
important changes in critical safety related
variables when they occur. (NUREG 0800, Section
5.2.2.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review SPDS
documentation for the operational
description of alarm capabilities, and the
method(s) used to alert users when
parameters have reached alarm limits.
B. Summary: The SPDS Design Document Package
describes the various alarm methods used for
bar graphs, numerical values and target
fills used on the top level displays and
associated trend graphs.
The SPDS consistently implements the color
red to indicate an alarm condition. On top
level displays, a red bar graph, target
fill, or box around a parameter value
indicates an alarm condition.
On 2nd level trend graphs, the displayed
numerical value of the alarming parameter
will turn red. The associated bar graph and
trend plot will remain unchanged.
Discrepancy #5 is used to document that
display alarms are controlled from two
different setpoint inputs. The Top level
display bar graph fill color is controlled
by setpoint values contained in the
Chromatics computer. Trend graph numerical
value color changes are controlled by
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 13 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
setpoint values contained in the Honeywell computer. In most cases there are minor differences between the alarm values for the same parameter. This could result in ambiguous alarm indication for parameters displayed on both top level and 2nd level displays.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211). AIDS Executive SAS Software Module
(Ref. 134, page 6). SAS setpoint values (Ref. 140). Top Level.P Chrom Software Module
(Ref. 147, page 7).
D. Conclusion: This item will remain Open until discrepancy #5 is resolved.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 14 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.1.5 Requirement: For each plant modemof operation,
the display formats may either be automatically
displayed or manually selected. (NUREG 0800,
Section 5.5.1.2)
A. Verification Task(s): Verify that the
display screens can be used to track the
mode of plant operation.
B. Summary: The SPDS Design Document Package
discusses the following top level displays
which are manually selected to cover all
modes of plant operation:
1. Normal
2. Heatup/Cooldown
3. Cold Shutdown
The message area of the 2nd level trend
graphs also shows the operating mode based
on the most recent top level display
selected at the Chromatics console. The
trend graph mode indication will not change
until a different top level display is
selected at the console.
C. Verification Reference(s):
Lesson Plan T-SLA-LP 2.13.4, (Ref. 10), Section IV, Handout #2.
Quadrex Functional Specification, (Ref. 8)
page IV-2.
SPDS Design Document Package, (Ref. 211)
Section 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 15 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
D. Conclusion: The manual selection of plant mode used by Kewaunee meets this requirement.
This item is considered closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 16 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.1.6 Requirement: The variables associated with each critical safety function should also be available for display and operator assessment (NUREG 0800, Section 5.0)
A. Verification Task(s): Verify that the entire SPDS parameter/variable set is available to the operator at all times.
B. Summary: The SPDS Design Document package contains a complete set of drawings for each computer point shown on the SPDS display screens. These drawings depict all of the information used to develop that point for display.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211), Appendix B.
D. Conclusion: The operator has access to the SPDS variables at various locations within the control room and on process computer displays, which would allow assessment of any questionable variable. This review item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 17 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.1.7 Requirement: There should be provisions in the display to indicate to the control room operator that a change in the mode of plant operation has occurred (NUREG 0800, Section 5.5.1.2)
A. Verification Task(s): Review displays to verify that plant modes are indicated.
B. Summary: The top level and 2nd level displays indicate the plant mode for Normal Operation, Heatup/Cooldown and Cold Shutdown conditions, based on the most recent selection of the top level display at each Chromatics console.
C. Verification Reference(s):
Video copies of Kewaunee displays (Ref.
202).
Lesson plan T-STA-LP 2.13.4, (Ref. 218),
Section IV.
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 3.5.
Quadrex Functional Specification, (Ref. 8),
pages IV-2 and IV-3.
D. Conclusion: This item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 18 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.1.8 Requirement: The display should be responsive to transient and accident sequences including symptoms of severe accidents. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.3.2)
A. Verification Tasks: Review FSAR Chapter 14 to assure that display data throughput and range are adequate for the transient times and ranges given in the FSAR.
Perform an SPDS "walk through" for simulator scenarios (Approx 3) to ensure that display data for the SPDS parameters aid the operator in responding to the transient being simulated.
B. A review of the FSAR shows three transient times of <10 seconds with a majority of the transients at 60 to over 1000 seconds under a variety of accident conditions. Each transient curve also defines a maximum value for that associated parameter.
The initial display callup time is approximately 4 seconds with updates approximately every 12 seconds. The 2nd level trend graphs display the previous 30 minutes of data with each point representing the average of 6 seconds of data.
With the exception of the Pressurizer Pressure, Nuclear Power and Delta T Average, transients (FSAR Figures 14.1-6 and 14.1-7) the 2nd level trend graphs will allow the operators to obtain information to aid in
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 19 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
responding to the transient conditions. Due to the 12 second update time, it is possible for fast transient parameters to complete a transient between SPDS updates.
The "walk-through" verification will be conducted during the dynamic testing at the simulator.
C. Verification References: SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 2.1, 4.4 and Appendix B. Kewaunee FSAR Chapter 14 (Ref. 212)
D. Conclusion: The faster transients (i.e.<l0 sec) could be over before the operators are aware of them. The update rate of the top level displays is not responsive to fast transient type data, however the trend graphs could give information to aid operators in responding to plant conditions.
This item remains open pending completion of the simulator walkthrough scenarios.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 20 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.2 Data Scan Intervals
3.2.1 Requirement: The displayed data should represent the current status of critical plant variables (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.3.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review documentation to identify the available scan interval capabilities of the system. Review the assigned scan (i.e. update) interval specified for each SPDS point, including intermediate calculational results, for reasonable application of the system capabilities with expected operator needs.
B. Summary: The Honeywell manual (5100293, Section 3) identifies the fastest available scan rate as once per second, with longer intervals extending into minutes.
The point drawings contained in the SPDS Design Document Package include the various scan rates for sensor inputs and the Honeywell intermediate points used to develop the information displayed on the SPDS screens.
As part of the overall V&V methodology for algorithm verification, both scan intervals and the computational order of computed values were reviewed. In general, all of the SPDS scan rate intervals are acceptable. Most points were in the 1 and 5 sec range with temperatures within the 15 to 60 second range. Some points indicate that they are
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 21 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
scanned on demand (DMD) which can vary from 5 seconds to 60 seconds. Digital points are scanned every 0.25 seconds.
The Top level displays are updated approximately every 12 seconds and on the trend graphs each point is the average of 6 seconds of data.
C. Verification Reference(s): SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Appendix B.
D. Conclusion: As discussed in section 3.1.8, the display update rate of 12 seconds appears to be restrictive for displaying current status under fast changing conditions.
The data scan rates for the individual points were acceptable.
This item will be reviewed during the dynamic testing to determine if the long display update rate is discernable to the operators.
This item will remain open until dynamic testing is completed, and discrepancy 94 is resolved.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 22 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.2.2 Requirement: The time -delay from when the sensor signal is sampled to when it is displayed should be consistent with other control room displays (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.3.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Verify that the actual system performance is consistent with the design relative to CRT update interval.
B. Summary: The SPDS display information is processed by the same Honeywell process computer that controls the data shown on the other control room computer displays. The time delay for all displays, both SPDS and others, is consistent.
C. Verification Reference(s): Honeywell Block Diagram (Ref. 77).
D. Conclusion: Since the Honeywell computer process control display data for both the SPDS and other display CRT's, the time delay of data shown on both SPDS and other displays is consistent.
This review item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 23 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.2.3 Requirement: The sampling rate for each critical plant variable is such that there is no meaningful loss of the data presented to the operator (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.3.1)
A. Verification Task(s): None
B. Summary: None.
C. Verification Reference(s): None.
D. Conclusion: This requirement is satisfactorily addressed in the preceding two sections and is therefore considered closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 24 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.3 Scale Optimization
3.3.1 Requirement: Each critical plant variable is
displayed with an accuracy sufficient for the control room operator to discriminate between conditions that impact the plant's safety status and normal operating conditions (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.3.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review all alarm limits for reasonableness with respect to the span of the point to be monitored.
B. Summary: The point drawings contained in the SPDS Design Document Package were
reviewed for all values or digital logic states used as a basis for an alarm
threshold.
The Top level bar graphs do not show a vertical scale, they only display limit
lines and a numerical value for each
parameter beneath its bar graph.
Discrepancy #6 resulted because the
instrumented range for Containment Pressure is -5 to 200 psig and the alarm setpoint is 1.0 psig. The ability to accurately
distinguish between normal and abnormal
conditions is inadequate.
Discrepancy #7 documents that the
Pressurizer level input is only from a wide
range sensor (0 - 100%). The SAS program
attempts to select between wide range and
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 25 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
narrow range based on RCS temperature conditions, but will only be able to display wide level under all conditions.
Discrepancy #93 resulted from the SAS displays indicating 0-150 gpm for inputs of 0-100 and 0-110 gpm respectively.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package, Appendix B (Ref. 211).
SAS setpoint values (Ref. 140) Chromatics Code Listing TOPLEVEL.P (Ref. 147).
D. Conclusion: Since the Top level bar graphs displays setpoint limit lines, these will aid the operator to see if a variable is approaching its alarm condition. The trend graphs can also be used by the operator to monitor variables of interest over a period of time to determine their changes.
This item will remain open until the discrepancies 6, 7 and 92 are resolved.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 26 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.3.2 Requirement: The displays should be capable of presenting magnitudes and trends of critical plant variables or derived parameters (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.4.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review the SPDS Design Document Package to determine
trending capabilities of the Chromatics Consoles. Review the critical parameter trend graphs to ensure that when associated CSF EOPs require that a variable be "maintained" relative to a specified value that the trending will support this
requirement.
Review the trending implementations for adequate scaling and resolution relative to CSF EOP demands.
B. Summary: The 2nd level trend graphs are
organized in the following functional
groupings.
GROUP NAME LABEL CONTENTS (TREND PARAMETERS)
Nuclear Instr. Power Range Power Intermediate Range Power Source Range Power
Contain LPR Containment Sump Level Containment Pressure Containment Radiation
RCS Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pres Pressurizer Level Core Exit Temperature Subcooling
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 27 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
GROUP NAME LABEL RCS TEMP WR
Containment HHT
RCS TEMP NR (NOTE: NR is just the WR with an expanded scale for easier reading)
Core Cooling
S/G Press
S/G NR Levels
S/G Feed &-Steam Flows
AFW Flows
Tank Levels
CONTENTS (TREND PARAMETERS) RCS Loop A Hot Leg Temperatures RCS Loop A Cold Leg Temperatures RCS Loop B Hot Leg Temperatures RCS Loop B Cold Leg Temperatures
Link Update Rate Humidity (Future) Temp (Future)
RCS Loop A Hot Leg Temperatures RCS Loop A Cold Let Temperatures RCS Loop B Hot Leg Temperatures RCS Loop B Cold Leg Temperatures
Reactor Vessel Level Core Exit Temperature Subcooling
Steam Generator A Pressure Steam Generator B Pressure
Steam Generator A Level Steam Generator B Level
Steam Generator A-FF Steam Generator A-SF Steam Generator B-FF Steam Generator B-SF
Auxiliary Feedwater Flow to S/G A Auxiliary Feedwater Flow to S/G B
Containment Sump Level RWSW (Future) Condensate Storage Tank (Future)
Radiation Monitors Containment Radiation Air Ejector Radiation Steam Generator Blowdown Stack Effluent Radiation
Radiation
RCS P VS. T
Charging Letdown
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
RCS Pressure VS. RCS Average Temp
Charging Flow Letdown Flow
28 WPS-looo-88-010 REV. 1
The COLD SHUTDOWN top level display contains the following trend graph groupings;
SOURCE RANGE Source Range N31 output Source Range N32 output
RHR RHR flow RHR Hx Inlet Temperature RHR Hx Outlet Temperature
RCS RCS Pressure Core Exit Temperature Rx Cavity Level
C. Verification Reference(s): Lesson Plan T-SLA-LP 2.13.4, (Ref. 218) page
10 item IV.4.6, page 12 item IV.B.9 and Handout #3.
Video copies of Kewaunee displays (Ref. 202).
Quadrex Functional Specification, (Ref. 8) page IV-9 section E.
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211), Section 4.4.
CSF EOP Procedures (Ref. 23 thru 28).
D. Conclusion: The trend graphs meet the requirement of presenting magitudes and trends of critical plant parameters.
This item is considered closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 29 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.3.3 Requirement: Trend data are displayed with sufficient resolution in time and magnitude to ensure that rapidly changing variables are accurately displayed. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.4.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review SPDS Design Document Package to ensure that trend graphs are implemented for critical parameters. Review the trend graphs for adequate scaling and resolution relative to CSF EOP demands.
B. Summary: The cold shutdown Top level display contains trend graph that show the previous 2 hours of data for selected parameters.
The 2nd level displays all consist of trend graphs arranged by related parameters, except the RCS pressure and temperature envelope graph (DSP018). The trend graphs display the previous 30 minutes of data in 6 second increments for the variables contained on each trend graph as described in Section 3.3.2.
The trend graphs vertical scale for each variable is determined by the bar graph range for that variable shown on the same trend graph.
Discrepancy #2 was written because it can not be determined if the sensors being monitored for S/G Level (ANLO18 and ANLO14) are indeed "Narrow Range" measurements as
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 30 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
indicated on trend graph (DSP017). The range shown on all documents is 0-100% which would indicate a full range measurement for
these parameters.
Discrepancy #3 resulted from an engineering unit difference for S/G Feedwater Flows (ANLO26 and 027), CSF EOP F-0.3 requires readings in gpm, and the trend graph (DSP006) displays units of lbs/hr(106 ),
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211), Sections 4.3 and 4.4 and Appendix B.
CSF Procedures (Ref. 23 and 28).
D. Conclusion: The time axis is satisfactory for the intended purpose of tracking "increasing" and "decreasing" parameters as required to follow EOP conditions.
This item will remain open until the discrepancies 2 and 3 are resolved.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 31 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.3.4 Requirement: Where graphic representations of variables are used, scaling should be chosen to. allow tracking of variables over a wide range of abnormal conditions. Therefore, displays for normal conditions should not fill the entire display area (NUREG 0800, Section 6.2.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review CSF EOP and Reg. Guide 1.97 control ranges against the scales used in displays.
B. Summary: SPDS scaling meets the abnormal range conditions given in Regulatory Guide 1.97 with the exceptions of Core Exit Temp, Subcooling Margin', Containment Radiation, Hot Leg Temp, Cold Leg Temp Containment Temperature and RCS Pressure.
Except as noted earlier (Discrepancies 8, 9, 11 and 15) SPDS scaling is adequate with respect to the requirements of the CSF EOPs.
Discrepancy #10 resulted because the trend graph full scale range for RCS Pressure is 2500 psig. FSAR Figure 14.1-34, shows a range for this parameter in excess of 2700 psig. The existing range does not allow trending of data during abnormal conditions above 2500 psig.
C. Verification Reference(s):
Regulatory Guide 1.97, Rev. 2, December 1980 SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Appendix B.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 32 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
D. Conclusion: The vertical axis scaling for trend graphs is generally satisfactory except as noted in Discrepancies 8, 9, 10, 11 and 15.
This item will remain open until discrepancies 8, 9, 10, 11 and 15 are resolved.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 33 WPS-lo0o-88-010 REV. 1
3.3.5 Requirement: The SPDS should alert the control operator when a graphically represented variable is off scale. (NUREG 0800, Section 6.2.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review SPDS Design Documentation Package to identify the capabilities available to inform the operator when a displayed point is off scale. Review the lesson plan to ensure that the operators are trained to recognize the implemented techniques.
B. Summary: The SAS SPDS screens will display "NORMAL" data as a white numerical value on the Top levels and trend graphs. For those points using multiple inputs to measure the same parameter, at least two of the multiple inputs must be within range for the numerical value to remain in Normal data condition. If only one input from the multiple group is within range, or if any point is more than 10% above or below the average value, an Alert condition is indicated by showing the numerical value of the data in yellow. For any point which has all inputs out of range, the word "FAIL" will appear in yellow in place of the numerical value..
The SPDS lesson plan also covers the material and explains the various conditions of data being presented.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 34 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
"Future" points which are not connected at this time show as "FAILO on their displays
at all times.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 5.0.
Lesson Plan (Ref. 218), Section V and
handout #5.
D. Conclusion: The various methods of
informing the operator of failed or
questionable inputs is adequate to satisfy
the requirement.
This item is considered closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 35 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.4 Data Validation
3.4.1 Requirement: The displayed data should be validated on a "real timeu basis where practical (NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.3.3)
A. Verification Task(s): Review SPDS Design Document Package to verify that the SAS data validation techniques are implemented. Review the SPDS lesson plan for the inclusion of the data validation techniques implemented and for a discussion as to how an operator becomes aware that a point is invalid.
B. Summary: The Honeywell SEER program performs a High-Low limit test of all incoming sensors prior to passing data on to the SAS program.
All points processed by the SEER program including those for which SEER performs calculations (i.e. composed points), contain a data status flag in the data string received by the SAS program. For those inputs whose data flag is set for "novalue", the SAS program will not perform validation checks and will display the data as "FAIL".
For all SAS inputs, including composed
points, for which SEER has set the data flag to normal, the SAS program performs limit
tests against predefined engineering units for upper and lower range limits. Inputs
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 36 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
that do not pass these tests will be displayed as "FAILI.
Where redundant input data is used by SAS to monitor a parameter, that data passing the range checks will be subject to further validation. When at least two or more inputs are valid, and when all valid inputs are within a 10% bandwidth of the average for that parameter, the data is displayed as normal. If only one input of the multiple group is available, or if any are outside the 10% bandwidth, the data is displayed as alert.
Discrepancy #46 resulted from the data, manipulation technique of letting SEER compose (i.e. average) data points from multiple sensors prior to sending data to the SAS data validation program.
The SPDS lesson plan discusses the data validation techniques and explains the
various conditions of data being displayed.
C. Verification Reference(s):
Letter (NRC-84-123) from D. C. Hintz to D. G. Eisenhut (Ref. 12) page 12.
Lesson plan T-SLA-LP 2.13.4, (Ref. 218), page 13 item V and Handout #5.
Quadrex Functional Specification, (Ref. 8),
Appendix B Section II.
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 5.0.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 37 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
D. Conclusion: SAS does not check.the validity of inputs calculated in the Honeywell SEER program and passed over as a single input, such as an average value of multiple sensors. Since the SEER program only checks that sensors are within range limits and sets a data status flag for the single point being sent to the SAS program, it is possible for data to be included in the single composed input which would be rejected by SAS data validation techniques if the multiple inputs were available to SAS.
This item will remain open until discrepancy #46 is resolved.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 38 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.4.2 Requirement: The displayed data should represent the correct status of critical plant variables.
(NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.3.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review the algorithms
used to develop each of the displayed SPDS
points to ensure that the value displayed is
a correct representation.
B. Summary: Many of the attributes specified
by the various requirements of the V&V
program were reviewed at the same time,
although the other attributes are addressed
separately within this report.
Discrepancy #92 resulted from WPS response
to an earlier comment regarding coolant pump
status.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Appendix B.
D. Conclusion: With the exception of Reactor
Coolant Pump status, the algorithms for the
individual data points will provide the
correct status of critical plant variables.
This item will remain open until discrepancy
#92 is resolved.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 39 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.4.3 Requirement: Validated, unvalidated, and invalid
data are identified and coded where practical.
(NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.3.3)
A. Verification Task(s): Review SPDS design
document package to ensure that the method
of presenting unvalidated and invalid data
is presented to the operators is
implemented.
B. Summary: The SPDS design document package
describes the following display methodology
for coding of validated and invalid data.
Condition
Data which passes all SAS validation tests
One input remaining from multiple inputs or has input more than 10% away from average value
Data which is rejected during the SAS validation tests or SEER range limits checks
Data which exceeds its AIDS setpoints
Data type
Normal
Alert
Fail
Abnormal
Method of display
White numerical value on all displays
Yellow numerical value on all displays
"FAIL" in yellow used in place of numerical value on All displays
Red numerical value on trend graph displays
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 40 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 5.3.
Lesson plan T-SLA-LP 2.13.4, (Ref. 218) page
15 item V.D and Handout #5.
Quadrex functional specification, (Ref. 8),
page IV-3 and Appendix B page B-8.
D. Conclusion: The display methodogy used on
the Kewaunee displays meets this
requirement.
This item is considered closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 41 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.5 SPDS Operability
3.5.1 Requirement: The SPDS will continuously display
information from which the safety status of the
plant can be assessed. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.2)
A. Verification Task(s): Ensure that the
system provides for continuous display
capability and that the operators are aware
that SPDS shall be continuously displayed.
B. Summary: Although the lesson plan states
that the appropriate top level display
should always be displayed on one of the
Control Room SAS CRT's, no administrative
procedure was provided to document that a
top level display shall always be displayed
on one of the CRT's.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 2.2.
Lesson plan T-SLA-LP 2.13.4, (Ref. 218),
page 7, item IV.A.3
D. Conclusion: The SPDS has two dedicated
consoles in the control room and one console
in the Technical Support Center (TSC) whose
only function is the display of SAS informa
tion which contain the SPDS parameters.
This item is open until discrepancy #89 is
resolved.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 42 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.5.2 Requirement: The operating crew should be provided
with the information and criteria they need to
perform an operability evaluation of the SPDS. In
addition, the crew must be able to easily recognize
a failed SPDS. (NUREG 0800, Section-5.1.3.4)
A. Verification Task(s): Review the SPDS lesson
plan for the identification of SPDS failure
criteria and the means of detection.
B. Summary: The link between the Honeywell
computer and the chromatics console is
continuously monitored and will activate a
message on all displays except cold shutdown if
it fails. The number "2" will also appear on
all trend graphs at the time the link failed.
If the Honeywell computer experiences a fail
ure, all data being displayed on the chromatics
consoles will show as "FAIL" in yellow.
These items are discussed in the lesson plan
for operator training.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 3.5.
Lesson plan (Ref. 10), Section VII.
D. Conclusion: The plant operators are provided
with the operability information needed to
recognize a failed SPDS and are made aware of
these methods during training.
This review item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 43 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.6 Electrical Isolation
3.6.1 Requirement: The SPDS shall be suitably isolated
from electrical and electronic interference with equipment and sensors that are in use for the
safety systems. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.3)
A. Verification Task(s): None.
B. Summary: Test results are documented in the following reports: (1) WCAP-7819, Revision
1-A, "Test Report, Nuclear Instrumentation
System Isolation Amplifier," April 1975, (2)
WCAP-7685-A, "Test Report on Isolation
Amplifiers," May 1975, and (3) WCAP-7817,
"Seismic Testing of Electrical and Control
Equipment." The first two reports were.
reviewed and accepted by the NRC staff in
the following documents: (1) AEC letter, D.
B. Vassallo to R. Salvatori, WEC, September
3, 1974, (2) AEC letter, D. B. Vassallo to
R. Salvatori, WEC, June 6, 1973, and the
third report was accepted by: AEC memo R. R.
Maccery to R. C. DeYoung, August 22, 1974.
The seismic qualification testing is in
accordance with the seismic criteria that
was the basis for plant licensing.
Environmental testing was not included
because the amplifiers are located in the
mild environment of the relay room that is
located beneath the control room.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 44 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
Class lE electrical .isolation methodology
was found acceptable during an evaluation of
the Kewaunee DCRDR.
C. Verification Reference(s):
Post-Implementation Audit Report, (Ref. 1),
Safety Evaluation Report (enclosure 1 to
letter K5-87-72) (Ref. 2).
Power Plant Facilities Information System
Priority Information List (Ref. 215).
D. Conclusion: This item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 45 WPS-looo-88-010 REV. 1
3.7 Configuration Control
3.7.1 Requirement: Major SPDS interfaces and
* performance characteristics (hardware and software) should be adequately documented to provide a basis for evaluating the acceptability of future system alterations/modifications.
(NSAC 39, Section 2)
A. Verification Task(s): Review SPDS
administrative controls to ensure that a configuration control system has been implemented to control the SPDS hardware and
software.
B. Summary: Administrative Control Directive
(ACD 1.9) specifies the requirements for
modifying the software on the process
computer systems. This directive would also apply to SAS and Chromatics software
programs.
Configuration control documents for SPDS
hardware interfaces and drawings were not
provided for review.
C. Verification Reference(s):
Administrative Control Directive, ACD 1.9, (Ref. 5)
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 46 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
D. Conclusion: The existing Administrative Control Directive for software control does not contain any references that it also includes SAS and Chromatics software.
The hardware and drawing configuration
controls are not available for review.
This item will remain Open pending resolution of discrepancy #12.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 47 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.8 Reliability
3.8.1 Requirement: The SPDS reliability analysis shall be
reviewed for consistency with the overall
requirements and objectives defined herein.
Included will be the review of any maintainability
(i.e., repair) assumptions incorporated within that
analysis. (NSAC 39, Section 2).
A. Verification Task(s): Review the reliability
analysis for consistency with overall system
requirements. Review repair assumptions for
reasonableness.
B. Summary: Discrepancy #13 was written to
document that the reliability analysis and
repair assumptions have not been provided for
review.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 2.2.
D. Conclusion: A reliability analysis of the SAS
is not available.for review. This item will
remain Open, pending resolution of discrepancy
#13.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 48 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.9 Location
3.9.1 Requirement: Critical plant variables for the
SPDS are presented on a single primary display
or on a group of displays at a single locations.
(NUREG 0800, Section 5.1.1.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Verify that the
critical parameters are displayed on a
single display.
B. Summary: As discussed in Sections 3.1.1,
3.1.2, 3.1.3 and 3.5.1, the critical plant
variables are grouped together and displayed
on the Top Level displays.
The SPDS displays are presented on two
dedicated SAS consoles located in the
control room and one console located in the
TSC.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 2.2.
D. Conclusion: The use of SAS consoles
dedicated for the display of SPDS parameters
meet this requirement.
This item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 49 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.9.2 Requirement: The display should be located so that it is convenient to the control room operating crew and where control room operators who are responsible for avoiding degraded and damaged core events can observe the displays.
(NUREG 0800, Section 5.2.1.2)
A. Verification Task(s): Verify that the SPDS display(s) are readily accessible to the control room operators.
B. Summary: The two SAS control room consoles
are positioned adjacent to the plant process computer display monitors and are accessable to control room operators.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Documents Package (Ref. 211), Section 2.2.
Panel Numbering Arrangements in Control Poom (Ref. 93).
D. Conclusion: The location of the SAS consoles in the control room satisfies this
requirement.
This item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 50 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.9.3 Requirement: The SPDS should be readily
distinguished from other displays on the control
board. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.2.1.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Verify that the SPDS
displays are uniquely identified from other
CRT displays.
B. Summary: The SPDS is displayed on two
dedicated SAS consoles located in the
control room.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Documentation Package (Ref.
211), Section 2.2.
Panel Numbering Arrangements in Control Room
(Ref. 93).
D. Conclusion: The SPDS is readily
distinguished from other control room
displays.
This item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 51 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.9.4 Requirement: The SPDS displays should be
readily accessible to the following personnel,
but not necessarily simultaneously: Shift
Supervisor, Control Room Senior Reactor
Operator, Shift Technical Advisor,.and one
Reactor Operator. (NUREG 0800, Section 5.2.1.2)
A. Verification Task(s): Verify that SPDS is
accessible to the: shift supervisor,
control room senior operator, shift
technical advisor, and one reactor operator.
B. Summary: The two control room SAS consoles
are located adjacent to the process computer
monitors in a central location. An
additional SAS console is located in the
Technical Support Center (TSC). These
consoles are available to all control room
and TSC personnel when these areas are
manned.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref. 211),
Section 2.2.
Panel Numbering Arrangement in Control Room
(Ref. 93).
General Arrangement Technical Support Center
(Ref. 94).
D. Conclusion: The SPDS displays are
accessable to the necessary personnel.
This item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 52 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.9.5 Requirement: The control room operating crew,
not personnel outside the control room, control
images displayed on the control room SPDS.
(NUREG 0800, Section 5.2.1.2)
A. Verification Task(s): Determine who has
control of displays on SPDS consoles.
B. Summary: Each SAS console is supplied with a dedicated keyboard which can request
display screens for that individual console only.
C. Verification Reference(s):
SPDS Design Documentation Package (Ref.
211), Section 2.2.
D. Conclusion: The control room operating crew
has control of the screens displayed on the
SAS consoles.
This item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 53 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.10 Procedures and Training
3.10.1 Requirement: Procedures which describe the
timely and correct safety assessment when SPDS
is and is not available, will be developed.
(NUREG 0800, Section 5.3.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review Emergency
Operating Procedures to determine usage of
SPDS displays during their performance.
B. Summary: The function of the SAS is to
supply at a centralized location, information to aid plant operators during
both normal and abnormal plant conditions.
Current procedures and training do not
require that SAS be used for safety
assessment. (e.g. determination that plant
conditions warrant performance of an EOP).
C. Verification Reference(s).
Emergency Operating Procedures (Ref. 23 thru
73).
D. Conclusion: Additional procedures are not required since Safety Assessment (e.g.
determination that plant conditions warrant
performance of an EOP) is not dependent on
the availibility of the SAS.
This item is closed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 54 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.10.2 Requirement: Control room operators should be
trained to respond to accident conditions both
with and without SPDS available. (NUREG 0800,
Section 5.3.1)
A. Verification Task(s): Review operator
training to determine usage of the SAS
during accident conditions.
B. Summary: Although a lesson plan which
describes the SAS parameters and functions
is in use, current operator training does
not include the use of the SAS during
accident conditions.
Training for operator response to accident
conditions without SPDS has been in effect
for several years.
C. Verification References:
Emergency Operating Procedures (Ref. 23
through 73).
Lesson plan (Ref. 218)
D. Conclusion: Operator response to accident
conditions using SPDS needs to be
incorporated into operator training.
This item is Open pending resolution of
discrepancy 90.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 55 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.10.3 Requirement: The control room operators
training program contains instruction and
training in the use of the SPDS in conjunction with operating procedures for normal, abnormal, and emergency operating conditions. -(NUREG
0800, Section 5.3.1.2)
A. Verification Task(s): Review operator training to verify instruction on usage of SPDS during normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions.
B. Summary: As discussed in Section 3.10.2, current training is limited to a lesson plan describing SAS parameters and functions.
C. Verification Reference(s):
Lesson Plan (Ref. 218).
D. Conclusion: Operator training needs to be revised to include use of SAS during normal, abnormal and emergency operations.
This item is Open pending resolution of
discrepancy 91.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 56 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.11 Human Factors
3.11.1 Requirement: The SPDS design shall incorporate
accepted human factors engineering principles.
(NUREG 0800, Section 5.4.1) (NRC V&V-Audit
October, 1986)
A. Verification Task(s): Review available documentation for human factors reviews that have been performed for the SAS.
B. Summary: The Quadrex Functional
Specification states that the generic SAS design was evaluated against human factors design criteria.
SASLOG-33 specifies the industrial design and human factors guidelines and abbreviations used during development of the generic SAS.
SASLOG-102 describes the human factors considerations relative to generic SAS displays.
Modifications to the generic design during development of the plant specific system were to have been reviewed as part of the overall control room design review.
Discrepancy #14 was written since this report was not supplied for review.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 57 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
C. Verification Reference(s):
Quadrex functional specification (Ref. 8)
page 11-2.
Letter (NRC-83-169) from C. W. Giesler to D.
G. Eisenhut (Ref. 11), page A-2.
SPDS Design Document Package (Ref..211)
Section 3.0.
SASLOG-33, "Industrial Design/Human Factors
Guidelines and Abbreviations" (Ref. 221)
SASLOG-102, "SAS Displays Human Factors
Considerations" (Ref. 220)
D. Conclusion: Human factors engineering
principles were well implemented during the
development of the generic SAS design.
No information has been provided to verify
that modifications to the generic system
were evaluated against human factors design
criteria.
This item is open pending resolution of
discrepancy 14.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 58 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
3.12 System Operation and Maintenance
3.12.1 Requirement: No additional operating staff
other than the normal control room operating
crew should be needed to operate the-display
during normal and abnormal plant operation and
during display outages. (NUREG 0800, Section
5.3.1.2)
A. Verification Task(s): During the Dynamic
testing, verify that only the regular
operating crew is required to operate SPDS.
B. Summary: None
C. Verification Reference(s): None
D. Conclusion: This item will remain Open
until dynamic testing has been completed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 59 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
3.12.2 Requirement: Vendor equipment documentation
shall be reviewed to verify implementation of
recommended periodic maintenance guidelines in
plant procedures. (NSAC 39, Section 2.0)
A. Verification Task(s): Review preventive
maintenance records during the field "walk
through".
B. Summary:
C. Verification Reference(s):
D. Conclusion:
This item will remain Open until the Field
Installation Audit has been completed.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 60 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
4.0 REFERENCES
1. Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant Safety Parameter Display System Verification and Validation Plan, WPS-1000-99001, Rev. 0.
2. Post-Implementation Audit Report for Wisconsin Public Service Corporation's Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (SAIC-86/3000) dated January 30, 1987.
3. Requirements for Emergency Response Capability (Generic Letter 82-33), NUREG 0737, Supplement 1, dated 12/17/82.
4. Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant SPDS Design Document Package (WPS-1000-88-009), Rev. 1 dated October 6, 1988.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 61 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
ATTACHMENT 1
Kewaunee SPDS Design Review
Reference Document List
REF NUM
1
DOCUMENT TYPE
Report
Report
Screens
Spec
Procedure
Lesson Pin
Report
Spec
Letter
Lesson Pin
Letter
Letter
Letter
Report
Letter
ENTS PR D BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.KEWAUNEE DOCUM
DOCUMENT NUMBER
SAIC-86/3000
K-87-72
51107909
ACD 1.9
77 Q
EIGEN-88-001
T-STA-LP 2.13.4
NRC-83-169
NRC-84-123
NRC-84-142
WCAP 7819
NRC-84-24
DOCUMENT TITLE
Post-Implementation Audit Rpt. for WPS Corporation's Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant SPDS (SAIC Technical Evaluation Report)
Safety Evaluation Report for the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant SPDS (Enclosure 1)
Copies of Kewaunee Display Screens (19 Screens) (See Reference #202)
System Specification Section Nine WPS Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (Honeywell)
Software Maintenance Control
SAS For Operators (Lesson Plan)(Superseded by T-STA-LP 2.13.4)
Safety Assessment System Evaluation Program Report (Quadrex)
Functional Specification (Quadrex)
WPSC Comments on Draft V&V Plan and Requirements Matrix
Safety Assessment System (Non-Approved Copy)
Safety Analysis Report for Safety Parameter Display System
Additional Information on SPDS
Seismic Qualification of SPDS Isolation Amplifiers
Nuclear Instrumentation System Isolation Amplifier
Schedule for Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) Implementation
Page Nr 10/06/1
1
REV/DATE
01-30-87
9-18-86
A/01-05-84
1/04-4-86
3-6-85/3-6-85
05-20-82
2 / 5-20-82
2/5/88
B / None
9/2/83
8/1/84
9/4/84
1A/4/75
2/3/84
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DATE RECEIVED
01-18-88
01-18-88
2-25-88
01-18-88
01-18-88
01-18-88
01-18-88
01-18-88
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/8/88
REF NUM
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
DOCUMENT TYPE
====mm
Letter
Letter
Letter
Letter
Report
Letter
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
NTS RE, BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.KEWAUNEE DOCUME
DOCUMENT NUMBER
K-84-66
NRC-84-88
K-86-161
NRC-86-113
WCAP-7685-A
K-87-12
UG-0
F-0.1
F-0.2
F-0.3
F-0.4
F-0.5
F-0.6
E-0
ES-0.0
ES-0.1
ES-0.2
DOCUMENT TITLE
NRC Request for Additional Information on Safety Parameter Display System
Additional Information on SPDS
NRC Notice of Impending SPDS Audit
Additional Information on SPDS
Test Report on Isolation Amplifiers
NRC Safety Evaluation Report of SPDS
User's Guide for Integrated Plant Emergency Operating Procedures
Subcriticality
Core Cooling
Heat Sink
Integrity
Containment
Inventory
Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
Rediagnosis
Reactor Trip Response
Natural Circulation Cooldown
Page N1 10/06/'
REV/DATE
3/26/84
5/25/84
8/8/86
8/21/86
5/75 .
4/8/87
orig/10/13/87
A/4/1/85
B/4/1/86
B/4/1/86
B/4/1/86
A/4/1/85
B/4/1/86
B/4/1/86
A/4/1/86
C/3/10/87
C/8/11/87
DATE RECEIVED
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/8/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
REF NUM
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
DOCUMENT TYPE
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
NTS RE, BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.EEWAUNEE DOCUME
DOCUMENT NUMBER
ES-0.3
E-0 ORF
E-1
ES-1.1
ES-1.2
ES-1.3
E-1
E-2
E-3
ES-3.1
ES-3.2
ES-3.3
ECA-0.0
ECA-0.1
ECA-0.2
DOCUMENT TITLE
Natural Circulation Cooldown with Steam Void in Vessel
Quick Reference Foldout Section E-0
Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant
SI Termination
Post LOCA Cooldown and Depressurization
Transfer to Coldleg Recirculation
Quick Reference Foldout Section E-1
Faulted Steam Generator Isolation
Steam Generator Tube Rupture
Post-SGTR Cooldown Using Backfill
Post-SGTR Cooldown Using Blowdown
Post-SGTR Cooldown Using Steam Dump
Loss of All AC Power
Loss of All AC Power Recovery Without SI Required
Loss of All AC Power Recovery With SI Required
Page Nc 10/06/8,
3
DATE REV/DATE RECEIVED
B/8/11/87 2/15/88
B/4/1/86 2/15/88
B/4/1/86 2/15/88
C/8/11/87 2/15/88
D/8/11/87 2/15/88
B/6/9/87 2/15/88
B/4/1/86 2/15/88
A/4/1/86 2/15/88
C/3/10/87 2/15/88
B/8/11/87 2/15/88
C/8/11/87 2/15/88
C/8/11/87 2/15/88
C/3/10/87 2/15/88
B/4/1/86 2/15/88
B/4/1/86 2/15/88
REF NUM
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
DOCUMENT TYPE
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
ENTS REC BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.KEWAUNEE DOCUM
DOCUMENT NUMBER
ECA-1.1
ECA-1.2
ECA-2.1
ECA-2.0 ORF
ECA-3.1
ECA-3.2
ECA-3.3
ECA-3 ORF
FR-S.I
FR-S.2
FR-C.1
FR-C.2
FR-R.1
FR-H.2
FR-H.3
DOCUMENT TITLE
Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirculation
LOCA Outside Containment
Uncontrolled Depressurization of All Steam Generators
Quick Reference Foldout Section ECA-2
SGTR With Loss of Reactor Coolant-Subcooled Recovery Desired
SGTR With Loss of Reactor Coolant-Saturated Recovery Desired
SGTR Without Pressurizer Pressure Control
Quick Reference Foldout Section ECA-3
Response to Nuclear Power Generation/ATWS
Response to Loss of Core Shutdown
Response to Inadequate Core Cooling
Response to Degraded Core Cooling
Response to Loss of Secondary Beat Sink
Response to Steam Generator Overpressure
Response to Steam Generator High Level
Page Nc 10/06/8t
REV/DATE
B/8/11/ 87
A/8/11/87
C/8/11/87
B/4/1/86
E/8/11/87
D/8/11/87
C/8/11/87
B/4/1/86
B/4/1/86
A/10/19/85
B/4/1/86
B/4/1/86
C/4/1/86
B/4/1/86
B/4/1/86
DATE RECEIVED
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
REF NUM
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
DOCUMENT TYPE
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Procedures (EOP)
Letter
Memo
Memo
Block Diagram
ENTS BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.KEWAUNEE DOCUM
DOCUMENT NUMBER
FR-H.4
PR-H.5
FR-P.1
FR-P.2
FR-Z.1
FR-Z.2
FR-Z.3
FR-I.1
FR-I.2
FR-I.3
FR-C.3
SASLOG-118 (I.D.2)
E3265
DOCUMENT TITLE
Response to Loss of Normal Steam Release Capabilities
Response to Steam Generator Low Level
Response to Imminent Pressurized Thermal Shock Condition
Response to Anticipated Pressurized Thermal Shock Condition
Response to High Containment Pressure
Response to Containment Flooding
Response to High Containment Radiation Level
Response to High Pressurizer Level
Response to Low Pressurizer Level
Response to Voids in Reactor Vessel
Response to Saturated Core Conditions
SPDS Parameters/Basis of Selection (Quadrex)
SAS Top Level Display Setpoints (Green Bay)
SAS Parameter Display Range (Green Bay)
Honeywell Computer System Block Diagram
Page Nc 10/06/6
5
REV/DATE
A/10/19/85
orig/4/l/85
B/4/1/86
A/10/19/85
B/4/1/86
A/10/19/85
A/4/1/86
A/4/1/86
A/4/1/86
B/4/1/86
A/10/19/82
5-9-832
2-1-84
7-31-84
C/
DATE RECEIVED
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/15/88
2/18/88
2/18/88
2/18/88
2/18/88
REF NUM
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
DOCUMENT TYPE
Evaluation
Manual (Sect)
Procedure (I&C)
Procedure (I&C)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Procedure (Maint)
Drawing
ENTS REC BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.KEWAUNEE DOCUM
DOCUMENT NUMBER
CCPUIPS-M
ICP 35.6
ICP 36.38
ICP 46A.01
ICP 46A.02
ICP 46A.04
ICP 46A.05
ICP 46A.06
ICP 46A.07
ICP 46A.08
ICP 46A.10
ICP 46A.11
ICP 46A.12
ICP 46A.13
237127A-E854
DOCUMENT TITLE
Objective of Data Validation
4500C Power Subsystem Mantenance (Honeywell)
CVCS-Reactor Coolant Pump IA Bearing Water Temp-Loop 132 ,
RC-Pressurizer Relief Tank Pressure Loop 440
CD-SAS Units 1, 2, and 3 Weekly Maintenance
CD-Honeywell Monthly Cleaning and Inspection
CD-Honeywell Power Supply Semi-Annual Check
Annual Flux Map A/D Converter Calibration
Honeywell Moving Head Disc 6 Month Preventive Maintenance
Honeywell Line Printer Semi-Annual Functional Check
Honeywell Mag Tape Annual Maintenance
Honeywell P.I.U. 6 Month Maintenance
Honeywell Floppy Disc Drive Yearly Maintenance
Honeywell Large Core Storage Maintenance
CD-Tektronix Video Copier Maintenance Monthly
Panel Numbering Arrangement in Control Room
Page No 10/06/8L
6
REV/DATE
None
3/83
E/7-8-86
G/11-17-87
4/9/85
A/9/3/86
B/9/3/86
3/24/87
C/9/3/86
B/9/3/86
A/9/17/86
A/10/1/86
A/9/3/86
1/21/86
AH/6/30/87
DATE RECEIVED
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
REF NUM
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
DOCUMENT TYPE
Drawing
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
Drawing (Block Diag)
KEWAUNEE DOCUM
DOCUMENT NUMBER
237127A-A329
BD-01
BD-02
BD-03
BD-04
BD-05
BD-06
BD-07
BD-08
BD-09
BD-10
BD-11
ENTS RECRW BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
DOCUMENT TITLE
General Arrangement-Technical M/ Support Center, Basement and First Floor
Cover Sheet & Index 1/
Pressurizer Press 2P
Pressurizer Level IN
Delta T - Tavg IH
Delta T - Tavg (con't) 1J
Delta T - Tavg (con't) 1H)
Delta T - Tavg (con't) 1i
Tavg, Delta T, Rod Insertion Limit 1H)
Rod Control 1 R/
Steam Gen Level 1M/
Steam Dump 2J/
Page No 10/06/86
REV/DATE
6/13/86
2-75
/8-21-86
/12-26-86
/10-8-86*
/10-8-86
/10-8-86
'10-8-86
/11-2-79
10-20-80
3-27-87
9-12-84
DATE RECEIVED
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
8
REF DOCUMENT NUM TYPE
106 Drawing (Block Diag)
107 Drawing (Block Diag)
108 Drawing (Block Diag)
109 Drawing (Block Diag)
110 Printout
Ill Printout
112 Printout
113 Printout
114 Printout
115 Printout
116 Block Diagram
117 Data Sheet
118 Data Sheet
119 Data Sheet
120 Data Sheet
KEWAUNEE DOCUMENTS RE'
DOCUMENT NUMBER
BD-12 Loop A
BD-13
BD-1 4
BD-15
Rpt.No.3 (HNW)
Rpt.No.4 (HNW)
Rpt.No.2 (HNW)
Rpt.No.3 (HNW)
SAS Code
Rpt.No.1 (HNW)
Handdrawn
DS No. 1
DS No. 2
DS No. 3
DS No. 4.
BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
DOCUMENT TITLE
Comp Steam/F.W. Flow
Loop B Comp Steam/F.W. Flow
Reactor Coolant Flow
Containment Pressure
Digital Input Report (D)
Composed Digital Inputs (L)
Composed Analog Report (G)
DTK,CVS and CVR Point Report (B&K)
SASP Parameter Display System Readin Module
Eigen Engineering (Analog Points) (A)
Basic Block Diagram (Honeywell CPUs)
Stm Gen A Stm Out F (Flow Correction Data Sheet)
Stm Gen B Stm Out F (Flow Correction Data Sheet)
Stm Gen A Feed-wtr In F (Flow Correction Data Sheet)
Stm Gen B Feed-wtr In F (Flow Correction Data Sheet)
REV/DATE
IN/3-27-87
2P/3-27-87
1H/9-12-84
2H/11-24-81
2-17-88
2-17-88
2-17-88
2-17-88
2/02-82
2-17-88
Page No 10/06/8
DATE RECEIVED
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
2/25/88
3/07/88
2/25/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
REF NUM
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Page No, 10/06/8L
NTS REC EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
DOCUMENT TYPE
Data Sheet
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Printout
Block Diagram
KEWAUNEE DOCUME
DOCUMENT NUMBER
DS No. 5
(mNW)
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
SAS Code
Handdrawn
DOCUMENT TITLE REV/DATE
Non Regener Ex Letdown Out F
Exp Factors List (CRV List)
PID Point List (SPC Point Lookup Table)
Chromatics/Honeywell Link Data 2/29/88 Sorted By Honeywell Point ID
Chromatics/Honeywell Link Data 2/29/88 Sorted By Array Word
Chromatics/Honeywell Link Data 2/29/88 Sorted by Link Byte
Chromatics/Honeywell Link Data 2/29/88 Sorted By Chromatis Word
Critical Safety Function Monitor 3-4-88
SASP Parameter Display Program - 3/5-12-82 Executive
SASP Parameter Display Program - 3/5-11-82 GAVDTY Module
SASP Parameter Display Program - 3/3-4-82 RATOCH Module
SASP Parameter Display Program - 5/5-8-82 PURSAS Module
SASP Parameter Display Program - 2/5-12-82 GSATEM module
AIDS Subsystem - AIDS Executive 3-3-88
AIDS Subsystem - Transfer Executive 3-3-88
AIDS Subsystem - PAPS Subroutine 3/5-3-82
AIDS Subsystem - SAPS Subroutine 5/5-3-82
SAS Data Interfaces (Software Modules)
DATE RECEIVED
3/2/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
3/2/88
3-7-88
3-7-88
3-7-88
3-7-88
3-7-88
3-7-88 3-7-88
3-7-88
3-7-88
3-7-88
3-7-88
3-7-88
REF NUM
DOCUMENT TYPE
139 Curve
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
Printout (Reduced)
Printout
Block Diagram
Drawing
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
KEWAUNEE DOCUMENTS RE(
DOCUMENT NUMBER
RD11.1.1
SAS Code
Handdrawn
Handdrawn
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
DOCUMENT TITLE REV/DATE
Kewaunee Reactor Coolant System Heatup and Cooldown Limitations.
SAS Setpoint Values
Flow Data Point List (P)
Incore TC Input Diagram
SAS Keyboard Layout
SASMAIN.P
SASDISP.P
JWLINK.C
TOPLEVEL.P
CHSBAR.C
TOPCOLDSD.P
DATAFIN.C
PMLINK.C
TEXTDISPLAY.P
TRENDGRAPH.P
TIMEDP.P
4-15-86
4-29-XX
1/8-25-83
1/8-24-83
1/3-85
1/7 27-83
0/7-25-83
0/3-6-82
4/8-87
1/3-23-85
0/3-6-82
0/
0/3-6-82
Page No 10/ 06/88 0
DATE RECEIVED
3/10/88
3/10/88
3/10/88
3/10/88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
.3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
Page Noy 10/06/E,
KEWAUNEE DOCUMENTS RE( BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
DOCUMENT TYPE
=== ==========
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
DOCUMENT NUMBER
Chrom CodePrintout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom Code
DOCUMENT TITLE
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
REF NUM
TIMEUPDATE.P
TRDCOLKEY.P
ARROWBOLD.C
BACKGRD.C
CNRC.C
DISP.C
INITIALIZE.C
HVSCOL.C
LEDS.C
LOGO.C
SASERROR.C
SIMKEY.C
TEXTS.C
TRENDDP.C
TRENDBACK.C
REV/DATE
0/3-6-82
1/8-2-83
0/3-6-82
1/7-15-83
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
1/1-84
0/
0/
0/
0/3-6-82
1/7-3-83
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
DATE RECEIVED
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
2
REF NUM
DOCUMENT TYPE
== = == = == === = =
KEWAUNEE DOCUMENTS
DOCUMENT NUMBER
BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
DOCUMENT TITLE REV/DATEDATE
RECEIVED================================= u======~======= ========
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
Page Nc. 10/06/8b
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chromn
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
UPDATE.C
VALMOD.C
VALDATE.C
VDSTXT.C
VECRECTAN.C
VTEXT.C
AIDSDISPLAY.P
BARDSPLAY.P
BAROUT.P
CLEARSCREEN.P
DATTIMECBR.P
DELAY.P
DSTCBR.P
DSTCHR2.P
DSTCHRTOP.P
0/3-6-82
2/11-85
2/3-12-84
1/8-24-83
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
1/7-15-83
0/3-6-82
1/8-24-83
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
0/
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88 3-16-88
REF NUM
DOCUMENT TYPE
~= =m~~
KEWAUNEE DOCUMENTS RE
DOCUMENT NUMBER
= = == = == =
BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
DOCUMENT TITLE REV/DATEDATE
RECEIVED==================== ========== ==== m~=
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout
Printout
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Printout (Reduced)
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Chrom Code
Rpt.No.2
Code
Code
Code
Page N' 10/06A
INITNORMAL.P
LIMITLINES.P
MONTHX.P
RECTANGLE.P
REDBOX.P
STAT12.TXT(VIEW)
SECBARGRAPH.P
SHIFT.P
TREND.C
GRAPH-LIB.C
BAKUP(floppy input prg).
TSTFLW, and VAR point Report (P)
CRV List (G)
SECICC.P
SECLOCA.P
SECLOSC.P
Chrom
Chrom
Chrom
0/
1/7-8-83
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
1/8-1-83
0/3-6-82
0/3-6-82
2-29-88
1/8-14-83
0/5-6-82
1/8-24-83
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
2/25/88
3/2/88
3-16-88
3-16-88
3-16-88
REF NUM
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
DOCUMENT TYPE
Printout (Reduced)
Screens
Drawing
Drawing
Manual (Sect)
Manual (Sect)
Spec
Procedure (I&C)
Printout (Reduced)
Letter
Report
FSAR
Corr.Fact. (Handmade)
Memo
Printout
Printout
Memo
ENTS R BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.KEWAUNEE DOCUM
DOCUMENT NUMBER
Chrom Code
237127A-E3416
237127A-E3417
51107909
WPS-K1-244
9285-ICE-35212
Request 000 & 001
NRC-85-84
WPS-l000-009
Chap. 14
JDD 88009
TRX:610
TRX:613
N/A
DOCUMENT TITLE
SECSGTR.P
Copies of Kewaunee Display Screens (9 screens) (see reference #3)
ICCMS Logic Diag. Train A
ICCMS Logic Diag. Train B
Sect 9, Redundant Measurements (Honeywell)
TDC 4500 Instructions (Honeywell)
Spec for ICCMS
Table 3.3.1.3-7A, Analog Input Ch A
KNPP/Honeywell PPFIS List
Status of Safety Parameter Display System
SPDS Design Document Package (Eigen)
Safety Analysis
Flow Correction Factors F-100OG-F007G
Doyel to Allen Re: Telecon with Chadek
Priority Information List From Power Plant Facilities Information System
Drawing Information List From Power Plant Facilities Information System
WPS V&V Comment Response
Page N; 10/06/b
14
REV/DATE
0/5-6-83
10-15-87
/2-5-86
/2-5-86
A/1-5-84
/10-77
5/11-10-85
1/
/8-1-84
4-26-85
0/4-19-88
3/7-1-85
None
5/3/88
4/25/88
4/25/88
DATE RECEIVED
3-16-88
1-18-88
4/11/88
4/11/88
4/11/88
4/11/88
4/11/88
4/11/88
4/11/88
2/8/88
N/A
4-25-88
4-23-88
5-3-88
5-9-88
5-9-88
8-3-88
REF NUM
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
DOCUMENT TYPE
Lesson Plan
Drawing
Memo
Memo
Specificat ion
Memo
Report
NTS REI BY EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.KEWAUNEE DOCUME
DOCUMENT NUMBER
T-STA-LP 2.13.4
E2021
SASLOG-102
SASLOG-33
9285-ICE-3073
WPS-1000
DOCUMENT TITLE
SAS Lesson Plan
Rad Monitoring Logic, Sh. 3 of 3
SAS Displays Human Factors Considerations
Industrial Design/Human Factors Guidelines & Abbreviations
Inadequate Core Cooling Monitoring System (ICE-273(80K5)/LRl)
Calc Sheets F100OG thru F1007G
SPDS Design Document Package
Page No; 10/06/8\
REV/DATE
B/4-21-88
G/
/5-17-82
/5-15-81
1/3-6-86
None
DATE RECEIVED
8-3-88
8-3-88
9-12-88
9-12-88
9-12-88
10-6-88
10-6-88
ATTACHMENT 2
Discrepancies
During the design review phase of the SPDS V&V program, the
following 94 discrepancies were identified. Based on
additional information received from WPS, 74 discrepancies
have been resolved and closed.
The remaining 20 discrepancies have been categorized as
follows:
o Category 1 - Discrepancies which will require
modifications to the SPDS hardware and/or software.
Discrepancies in this category include #'s 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 46 and 94.
o Category 2 - Discrepancies which will require
development or revision of station procedures or
documents. Discrepancies in this category include #'s
12, 13, 14, 89, 90, 91, 92 and 93.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. WPS-1000-88-010 .. REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 1 Date: 3/18/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1)
2)
3)
Read In Module - Source File (Ref 114/P9) Composed Analog Report, (Ref 112/P6-1) Analog Inputs, (Ref 115/P5-1)
Requirement #: N/A (ANLO54, ANLO55)
Subject: Error in readin module source code comments.
Problem Description: Source code descriptions for CON G,145 and CON G,146 reference composed analog points F8003G and F8004G. These points are not in the Composed Analog Report. The Analog Inputs printout list points F8003A and F8004A for AFW lA and lB flow.
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref. 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Sigrif ture
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.1
Jo / 4C / -e
/'0 /J$_/ 0
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 2 Date: 3/29/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) Display 017 (S/G (NR) Level)
2) EOP F-0.3 Heat Sink
3) ANL 018 & 019 (S/G Level)
Requirement #: 3.3.3
Subject: Steam Generator level nomenclature ontrend graph
Problem Description: The trend graph and EOP both refer to
"Narrow Range" level. The range being displayed for this
point is 0-100% and no information has been provided to
verify that ANL 018 and ANL 019 are narrow range level
indications.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.2
/ /
/ /
/_ / Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 3 Date: 3-29-88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) Display 006 (Feed Flow & Steam Flow) 2) CS? EOP F-0.3 Heat Sink 3) ANL 026 & 027 (S/G Feed Flow)
Requirement #: 3.3.3
Subject: Engineering unit requirement differences.
Problem Description: The CS? EOP has a requirement for total feedwater flow to SG's greater than 200 GPM. Trend graph display flows have units of lbs/hr(10 6 )
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.3
/
/ /
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 4
References: 1) WPS Letter NRC-84-123
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.1.1
Date: 4/29/88
Page 1 of 1
Subject: Minimum set of critical plant variables
Problem Description: Although listed in WPS letter NRC-84
123, Reactor Coolant Average Temperature is not displayed on
the SPDS. Tavg can (at best) be estimated using the
Pressure/Temperature 2nd level display.
Disposition: Cancelled. Reactor Coolant Average temperature
is provided in the message area of the normal operation and
heatup/cooldown top level displays.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Si g nAtu r e
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
_e / Ic) / 5- / 37~t
__QJ/ / Date
2.4 WPS-lOOO-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 5 Date: 4/13/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) SPDS Design Document (Ref. 211)
2) GEN002, Sh 1 & 2 (Drawing)
3) AIDS Setpoint List (Ref. 140)
4) Chrom Setpoint (Ref. 147/P7)
Requirement #: 3.1.4
Sublect: Alarm limits
Problem Description: The top level display bar graph alarm
setpoints are contained in the Chromatics programs. The
associated 2nd level trend graph numerical value color is
controlled by the AIDS programs. The setpoint value for the
same parameter is not the same in the following cases.
AIDS Chrom ANL001 Hi - 2484 Hi - 2485
Low - 1816 Low - 1815 ANL002 Hi - 56 Hi - 57
Low - 18 Low -18 ANLO18 & 19 Hi -.65 Hi - 66
Low - 16 Low - 15 ANLO22 & 023 Hi - 1050 Hi - 1050
Low - 500.0 Low - 500 ANLO34 & 035 Hi - 553 Hi - 554
Low - 521 Low - 520
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by: /
V & V Review: / /
Disposition Verified: / /
Signature Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.5 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 6 Date: 4/18/88
Page 1 of I .
References: 1) AIDS Setpoint List (Ref. 140)
2) ANLOO8, Point Drawing (Ref. 211)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Containment Pressure Alarm Setpoint.
Problem Description: Containment Pressure is measured by the
average of two sensors with range of -5 to 200 psig. The
Containment Pressure Alarm is 1.0 psig. The accuracy of the
algorithm is inadequate for determining this low of an alarm.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.6
/ /
/ _/
_ / / _
Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 7
References: 1) ANL002 (Drawing)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Date: 4/18/88
Page 1 of 1
Subject: Pressurizer level input range.
Problem Description: The only variable being monitored for this parameter is the wide range sensors. The SAS program attempts to select between wide range and narrow range based on Tave temperature conditions, but will only display wide level under all conditions.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
D / / /
/ / Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.7 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 8
References: 1)
2)
3)
Date: 4/18/88
Page 1 of 1
V ANLQf4 (Drawing) DSP008 (Drawing)
Ref. 209/Pl7
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: AVG Core Exit Temp Range.
Problem Description: The core exit thermocouple process ranges are shown in the Honeywell database as -100 to 1000F.
This range is inadequate to support CSF EOP F-0.2.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.8
/ /
/ /
_/ / Date
WPS-looo-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 9 Date: 4/18/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1)
2)
3)
CSF (F-0.2) (Ref. 24) DSPOO1, 008 and 010
ANL006 (Drawing)
Requirement #: 3.1.3
Subject: Inadequate subcooling temperature range.
Problem Description: The display range on both trend graphs is from 100 0 F subcooled to 50oF superheated. The adverse containment condition in the CSF EOP requires a decision based on 120OF subcooling. The SAS range is inadequate to support this decision.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.9
/ /
/ / Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 10
References: 1)
2)
3)
Date: 4/22/88
Page 1 of 1
ANL001 (Drawing)
DSPOO8 (Drawing)
FSAR Chap 14 (Ref. 212)
Requirement #: 3.3.4
Subject: RCS pressure Trend graph range.
Problem Description: The RCS pressure trend graph range is
0-2500 psig. The instrument input range for this parameter
is 0-3000 psig. Under an abnormal condition that exceeds
2500 psig the trend graph will be at the top of its range and
will not be usable to follow this parameter. FSAR Chapter 14
Figure 14.1-34 requires a full scale range of over 2700 psia.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:Signature
/ /
_ _ /
_ / / Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.10 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 11 Date: 4/22/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 058 (Drawing)
2) CSF F-0.1 (Ref. 23)
3)
Requirement #: 3.1.3
Subject: CSF EOP function is not connected.
Problem Description: CSF EOP F-0.1 requires the monitoring
of Intermediate Range startup rate. The inputs are shown as
"Future" points and are not connected.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.11
/ / _
/ _ / _
_ / _ / _
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 12 Date: 4/22/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.7.1
Subject: Configuration Control not available.
Problem Description: The requirement to review documentation of major SPDS interfaces (hardware and software) can not be completed at this time since these documents for hardware and drawing control were not provided for review.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.12
/ / _
/ /
/ _/ _
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 13 Date: 4/22/88
Page 1 of 1References: 1)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.8.1
Subject: Reliability analysis not available.
Problem Description: The requirement to review the reliability analysis and maintenance assumptions can not be completed at this time since these documents were not provided for review.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.13
/ D/
/ _/
/ _ / _
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 14 Date: 4/22/88
Page 1 of 1References: 1)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.11.1
Subject: Human factors review documentation not available.
Problem Description: Although incorporation of human factors principles during generic SAS development has been verified, no information has been provided to verify that the modifications made to develop a plant specific system were reviewed by human factors qualified personnel.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
Signature
2.14
/ / / /
/ / Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 15 Date: 4/29/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) CSF EOP F-0.1
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.1.3
Subject: CSF EOP Decision Point.
Problem Description: CSF EOP F-0.1 requires a decision based
on Source Range startup rate. This parameter is not part of
the SPDS parameter set.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.15
/ _/
_/ __ /
/ _/ Date
WPS-1000-88-010
REV. 1
Number: 16
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 001
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 21077
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: ,
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified: eZ fSignat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
_6 /$/&Dat Date
2.16 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT.
Number: 17 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 009
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 24070 and 24071
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: / z4 V & V Review:
Disposition Verified f Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
_zn/ _ LE / F Da- te
Date
2.17 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 18
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 001
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 29012
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Sinat i e
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.18
/e8 / s-, a-i
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 19
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page I of 1
References: 1) ANL 012
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 29004
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review: J Disposition Verifiedakgep,
f Signavre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.19
S/
Y?
L/ /i~& Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 20 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1References: 1) ANL 013
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 29005
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: / &
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified (Signatdre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
/o?/ 3.S / Xf
Date
2.20 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 21 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 014
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 15045, 21094, 21095, 21096
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:/ZV & V Review:
Disposition Verified: Signatilre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
S/ '5D/ t
Date
2.21 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 22
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 015
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 15046, 21097, 21098, 21099.
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: 4
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified: Signatire
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.22
/4 / S / £..
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 23 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1References: 1) ANL 020
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 23022
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review:
Disposition Verified/Signat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.23
6 - / J-d
Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 24
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 021
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 15118, 21075, 23021
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: / o
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:I Signatore
/o /0J /
Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.24 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 25 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 026
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 15043, 21094, 21095, 21096
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: /4 - zoo.,-
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified: A
Signature Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.25 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 26 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANLO27
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 15044, 21097, 21098,
21099
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: 4 V & V Review:
Disposition Verified it C2 F Signaiure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.26
_6 /AL /
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 27
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 030
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 15123
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: 7 Disposition Verified
signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.27
I" / J~ / r (0o/5SJ/A
Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 28 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 031
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 15125
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.28
_J _ 7 ?L / /o /j- /ts
_(i S L/& Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 29 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 034
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subiect: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 15124
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared
V & V Review: L
ire
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.29
/0 / D a
Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 30
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of I
References: 1). ANLO35
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 15126
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review:
Disposition VerifiedSignat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.30
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 31
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 038
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 29010, 29007
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: / 1
V & V Review: =,z Disposition Verified
Signat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.31
/0 / J /rr
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT ,
Number: 32 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 044
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 24068
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified S ign atire
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.32
/o / s-/ 77?
/O -/ 94: Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 33 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 047
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 24040, 24062
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified. Signat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.33
lo / J / 8
Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 34 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 054
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subiect: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 48301
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: / rR V & V Review: Disposition Verified
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.34
_ 5 /3/ $'
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 35 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 055
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 48302
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: /
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified E E SignaGure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.35
/~ ~/ /
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 36 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 058
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subiect: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 4122802, 4122804
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: 2
Disposition Verifiedi / .( Signat ure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.36
/ / 5- / de
a/teL/ Pr Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT,
Number: 37 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 059
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: NM41F, NM42F, NM43F,
NM44F
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: /&Z '
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified: I Signatdre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
/D /___
_ _/- d/ r
2/ / Date
2.37 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 38 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 060
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 4156401, 4156403
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: .
Disposition Verified/ Signatue
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.38
__j' - / -F
0C / 5 /FRI Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 39
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 163
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 23030
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: J ZO,4
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signatude
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.39
to / /77
Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 40 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 164
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 15122
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.40
'0 / J$ / Eg
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 41
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 165
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: 15121
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition VerifiedSignat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
fo />2 ~k/ 'F
.1z/ D/ Date
2.41 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT,
Number: 42 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) IDIGO2
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subiect: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 52/RTA, 52BYA, 52RTB, 52BYB
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:/z V & V Revie*:
Disposition 1 erified* fSignatire.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.42
/3 / 5 / ff
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 43 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) IDIGO4
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: need sensor identification.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:._
Disposition Verified Signafure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.43
/0 / pr / gk
Date
WPS-looo-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 44
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) N8029G
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation requirements for the following sensors: 4156501
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review: , Disposition Verified
Signatitre'
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.44
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 45
References: 1) N8030G
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.6.1
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
Subject: Electrical Isolation
Problem Description: Unable to determine the isolation
requirements for the following sensors: NM32F
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 215.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verifie *:
EIGEN ENGINEERING,,INC. 2.45
&- / 7
_ 1/ / Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 46 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) SPDS Design Document (Ref. 211)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.1
Subject: Data Validation
Problem Description: Although the SAS data validation techniques are adequate, data manipulation in SEER (i.e.
averaging) results in a single input to SAS. This single input will not be subjected to SAS data validation.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.46
/ _/
_ /__ /
/ / Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 47
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 004
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals until
the "DMD" is defined for point: Il001G to I1020G
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the DMD time for these points is 5
seconds.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: .A e oa
Disposition Verified:( .' 0z Signafure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.47
/A0 / 5 /&,
10/ S / Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 48 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 005
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.3
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals until
the "DMD" is defined for point: L8020G and L8021G
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the DMD time for these points is 5
seconds.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified* I Signakure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.48
/c@ / 9"/ F'd
Date
WPS-lO00-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 49 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of I
References: 1) ANL 006
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals until
the "DMD" is defined for point: Ill00G
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the DMD time for this point is 1
minute.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signaure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.49
_,u / 37 / I
/s s ir/F
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 50
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 014
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals until
the "DMD" is defined for point: P8021G
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the DMD time for this point is 1
minute.
Disposition Prepared by: )6 e t
V & V Review:.
Disposition Verified signature Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.50 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 51
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 015
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals until
the "DMD" is defined for point: P8022G
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the DMD time for this point is 1
minute.
Disposition Prepared by: / &A
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signatire
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.51
_0/ 5 /~
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 52
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT,
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 026
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals until
the "DMD" is defined for point: P8021G
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the DMD time for these points are
1 minute.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified(e.i) Signat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.52
// / - / 8t
Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 53 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 027
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals until
the "DMD" is defined for point: P8022G
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the DMD time for this point is 1
minute.
Disposition Prepared by: zm! t,
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified: SignatIe3
EIGEN ENGI NEERING, INC. 2.53
/ J // { Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 54
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 037
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals until
the "DMD" is defined for point: L8022G, L8023G
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the DMD time for these points is 5
seconds.
Disposition Prepared by: ZV
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified L 9 Signat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.54
CQ/ -5- /S? Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 55
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) IDIGO2
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subiect: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals since
scan times for digital points is not given: Y0009L
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the scan time is 0.25 seconds.
Disposition Prepar d by: )&
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified: Signatdre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.55
~ 5// / FF -/ :5_/ Prf Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
Number: 56
References: 1)
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
IDIGO4 Status: Closed
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Scan Intervals
Problem Description: Unable to review scan intervals since scan times for digital points is not given: XS002L
Disposition: Per Ref. 214 the scan time is 0.25 seconds.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signafure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.56
/0 /~/7 __{L/ 5 / g1F
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 57 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 011
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 29012
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signabbure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.57
/0 /J7 /d' /0 / ,? E
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number; 58 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 012
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 29004
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:V & V Review: . Disposition Verified: ,
fSignatuqe '
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.58
_ / J / if
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 59 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 013
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for the following sensors is required: 29005
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared bX: t 2 V & V Review:
Disposition Verifie :, .I Signatlre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.59
/0 / 35 /
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 60 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 014 and 015
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: need flow units for.
1438.297 inwc for 23001, 23005, 23002 and 23007
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See References 217 and 223.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: J Disposition Verified
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.60
Id / -/ OF
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 61 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 020
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for the following sensors is required: 23022
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: A'V
V & V Review: r Disposition Verified:(I -' '
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.61
ao
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 62 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 021
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 23021
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: Ad
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.62
/6A / 5YA/ /o / 3 /6hP
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 63 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 026 and 027
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: need flow units for
368.5195 inwc for 23003, 23009, 23004 and 23011
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See References 217 and 223.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review: .
Disposition Verified T14' SignatEreN
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.63
/0 / CD/X
_12/ /~ Date
WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 64 Date:
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 037 & 005
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review since the
input is calculated by the ICCMS and is not given on the
drawing.
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: .
Disposition Verifie :
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.64
/0/ 52fgb
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 65 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 038
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for the following sensors is required: 29010 and 29007
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: d664 V & V Review:
Disposition Verified: Signatilre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.65
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 66 Date: 5/2/8,8
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 054
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 48301
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: ao/ V & V Review:
Disposition Verified t SSignat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.66
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 67 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 055
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 48302
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised .(Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: ME
Disposition Verified SignaIre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.67
/4 / J~ / rt
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 68 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 058 (Future)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 4122802 and 4122804
(Future Points)
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: ,
Disposition Verified Sig aEIre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.68
5 // /f
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 69 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 060
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 4156401 and 4156403
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified(.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.69
/4 / r / ASB2
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 70 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 163
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 23030
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: _,
V & V Review:
Disposition Verifie Signat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
/0 /s- /Jt
_Q/ - / 1t Date
2.70 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 71 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) IDIG15
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 23024, 23025, 23026,
23027, 23028, and 23029
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: Z 1 Disposition Verified:
f Signattre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
Date
2.71 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT,
Number: 72 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) N8029G
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs
display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for
the following sensors is required: 4156501
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared
V & V Review: que
Disposition Verified
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
/0 / / d
Date
2.72 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
--- I
KEWAUNEE.V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 73 Date: 5/2/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) N8030G
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Input Ranges
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of input vs display range. The engineering units of the input ranges for the following sensors is required: NM32F
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signa iur e
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
//4 / P
Date
2.73 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 74 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 005
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 20.00000
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: 44:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified I Signat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.74
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 75 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 011
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 1.00 and
2.30258
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:-,
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signakure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
_ Q/D_ /e Date
2.75 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 76 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 012
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 2.30258 and
10.0000
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition VerifiedSignaiure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
/ /J/Da JA/5 /71 Date
2.76 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT,
Number: 77 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 013
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 2.30258 and
10.0000
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.,
i'd /Ja- /
Date
2.77 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 78
References: 1) ANL 020
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 1.000 and 55.000
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by.: wxolA_
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signakure
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.78
./o /j4 / p
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 79 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 021
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 1.0000 and
49.95019. The accuracy of the CRV coefficients for F9134G
can not be verified. The accuracy of FLW Base Temp, press,
and specific vol values for F0134F can not be verified.
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.79
/0/ 6S /, Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 80 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 026
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 230.7930. The
accuracy of the CRV coefficients for F9466G can not.be
verified. The accuracy of the FLW Base Temp, press and
specific volume values for F0466F and F0467F can not be
verified.
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See References 217 and 223.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: 4
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signdture
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
Date
2.80 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT ,
Number: 81 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 027
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 230.7930. The
accuracy of the CRV coefficients for F9476G can not be
verified. The accuracy of the FLW Base Temp, press and
specific volume values for F0476F and F0477F can not be
verified.
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See References 217 and 223.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: /
V & V Review:
Disposition Verifie I Signatkre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC.
Date
2.81 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 82 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 037
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms since constants used do not have traceability to source data. The following constants need to be verified: 20.000
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review: 4 Disposition Verified
Sign ture
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.82
/~'5, gd' L/ 5Z / L
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
I
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 83 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 038
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 2.30258 and
10.000.
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by: V & V Review:
Disposition Verified & Signaure
EIGEN ENGINEERING? INC. 2.83
/V / fl / Jh't
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 84 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 060
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 8.000, 5.000,
5.000 and 2.29998
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signat re
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.84
/0 / 5/ ff
D t / Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 85 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) ANL 163
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms since constants used do not have traceability to source data. The following constants need to be verified: 1.000 and. 3000.000
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified Signatfre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.85
/fI / y- 4/ 2y
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 86 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) IDIGl5
2)
3)
Requirement 1: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 1.8000
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.86
y- / ks- / re _Q /5-/ ft
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 87 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) N8029G
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 10.000, 6.000,
5.000, 1.000 and 2.29998
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified IF.Sigdature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.87
/d /_SC_/AL /0, ~g
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 88 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) N8030G
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Algorithm constants
Problem Description: Unable to complete review of algorithms
since constants used do not have traceability to source data.
The following constants need to be verified: 10.000, 6.000,
5.000, 1.000 and 2.29998
Disposition:
Additional documentation received from WPS provided the
required information. See Reference 217.
The Design Document Package has been revised (Ref 224), and
this discrepancy is closed.
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified SignaIre
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.88
/o/ /
/J0Q / / W Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 89 Date: 5/3/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) SPDS Lesson Plan (Ref. 218)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.5.1
Subject: Continuous display of SPDS
Problem Description: Although the SPDS Lesson Plan states that the top level display should always be displayed on one of the Control Room SAS CRT's, there were no administrative procedures submitted for review to document this requirement.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.89
/ /
/ /
/ _/
Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 90 Date: 9/30/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) SAS Lesson Plan (Ref. 218)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.10.2
Subject: Procedures and Training
Problem Description: Operator training for response to accident conditions does not include available/unavailable SPDS.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
/ /
/ /
/ / DateSignature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.90 WPS-l000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT,
Number: 91 Date: 9/30/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) SAS Lesson Plan (Ref. 218)
2)
3)
Requirement #: 3.10.3
Subject: Procedures and Training
Problem Description: Operator training does not include use
of SAS during normal, abnormal and emergency operations.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:Signature
/ /
_ / /
_ / /
Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.91 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 92 Date: 9/30/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) SPDS Lesson Plan (Ref. 211)
2) WPS V&V Comment Response (Ref. 217)
3)
Requirement #: 3.4.2
Subject: Accuracy of critical plant variables
Problem Description: Reference 211, (drawing WPS-1000-IDIGl5)
bases the status of the Reactor Coolant Pumps (Running/Off)
on Reactor Coolant Loop Flow relative to 20%.
Reference 217 (discrepancy 486) indicates that flow
transmitteRoutput of 1.8 volts is equivalent to 49.19%
reactor coolant flow.
This could be very misleading since during low power
operation, (i.e. flow <49.19%) the SAS will indicate that the
reactor coolant pumps are not running.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:Signature
_ _/ /
_ / /
/ _/
Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.92 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 93 Date: 10/4/88
Page 1 of 1
References: 1) SPDS Design Document (Ref 224) 2) WPS V&V Response (Ref 217 3) ANL 020 & 021
Requirement #: 3.3.1
Subject: Display Accuracy
Problem Description: Per reference 217, the ranges of charging and letdown flow are 0-110 and 0-100 gpm, respectively as shown in Ref 224 (drawing DSP015), the SAS indicates ranges of 0-150 gpm.
1. This could be misleading since SAS implies considerably more flow available than rated for these systems.
2. Per Ref 224 (drawing DSP002) CHG-LDN flow differential indicates ranges of 0 to + 150 gpm. The range of this parameter should be -100 to 110 gpm.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:
Signature
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.93
/ /
/ /
/ __/ Date
WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
KEWAUNEE V&V DISCREPANCY REPORT
Number: 94
References:
Date: 10/4/88
Page 1 of 1
1)
2)
3)
SPDS Design Document (Ref 224)
WPS V&V Response (Ref 217)
ANL 163
Requirement #: 3.2.1
Subject: Current status of critical plant variables
Problem Description: Per reference 217, the range of RHR flow
is 0-6000 gpm. Per reference 224 (drawing DSP003) the SAS
range for RHR flow is 0-4000 gpm. The SAS range is
inadequate for RHR flows between 4000 and 6000 gpm.
Disposition:
Disposition Prepared by:
V & V Review:
Disposition Verified:Signature
/ / / /
Date
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 2.94 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 1
ATTACHMENT 3
Instructions For The Verification
of SPDS Composed Points
Instructions for Verification of, SPDS Control Documentation
The attached checklist identifies the various software controlled attributes of each SPDS point displayed. These attributes, are to be reviewed and compared to other plant documentation (e.g. Instrument Index, Instrument Loop Diagrams, Emergency Operating Procedures, and etc.) and the SPDS design documentation (i.e. SPDS Design Document Package). The following descriptions are intended to provide uniform guidance in the execution and documentation of these comparisons.
1. TOP LEVEL
Verify whether this point appears on a top level display. Put in a Yes or No in the blank.
2. TREND
Verify whether this point is used on a 2nd trend display. If so, write in the name of the display in the blank. If not, write in "None".
3. SCALE
If this point is used for creating a trend display, put in the range of the trend in the blank; otherwise put in "N/A".
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 3.1 WPS-looo-88-010 REV. 0
4. SAS HI/LOW ALARM:
All numbers or digital logic states used as a comparison
for an'alarm threshold on a top level display are to be
considered "alarms". All alarms in an algorithm shall
be verified for proper implementation as specified in
the SPDS Design Document Package and where applicable
the appropriate CSF. All references utilized to confirm the alarms shall be listed.
5. EOP(CSF) ENTRY VALUE
The EOP entry condition is the first decision point
shown in the F series Emergency Operating Procedures.
Verify that the required variable range being displayed
will provide the operator necessary information to
perform this decision. List reference used to obtain
this value.
6. EOP (CSF) CONTROL VALUE
The EOP control conditions are decision points shown in
the F series EOP's. Verify that the required variable
range being displayed will provide the operator
necessary information to perform this decision. List
references used to obtain these values.
7. INPUT RANGE VERSUS I/O RANGE:
All analog / digital raw data inputs shall be reviewed
for proper range implementation in the point algorithm.
All analog inputs shall have a specified range and
digital inputs shall have a specified binary state (e.g.
open/closed, closed/open, closed/not closed, or on/off).
Only if all the ranges associated with the displayed
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 3.2 WPS-lOOO-88-010 REV. 0
parameter are correct, should the "Satisfactory" be
designated with a YES. Otherwise,-a discrepancy report
shall be initiated and recorded.
8. ALGORITHM:
The algorithm for all displayed points shall be reviewed
for a consistent integration of all of the above as
specified in the SPDS Display Functional Descriptions.
Also the algorithm shall be reviewed for mathematical
correctness and consistency of engineering units. All
numbers used within equations that are engineering unit
conversion constants or correction factors shall be
considered "Constants". The documentation that
establishes the constants shall be reviewed for adequate
traceability to source data, accuracy of the established
equation and corresponding display precision, and
properly documented signoffs. Only if the algorithm
associated with the displayed parameter is correct,
should "Satisfactory" be designated.
9. CALCULATION ORDER:
All algorithms for displayed points shall be reviewed to
ensure that each calculation within the algorithm uses
the latest available data. That is, each input to a
calculation shall be reviewed to verify that for a given
scan interval, all inputs are determined prior to
performing the calculation. Only if the calculation
order associated with the displayed parameter is
correct, should "Satisfactory" be designated.
Otherwise, a discrepancy report shall be initiated and
recorded.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 3.3 WPS-looo-88-010 REV. 0
10. SCAN INTERVALS:
All displayed points, including data input points and intermediate calculations, shall be reviewed for reasonable and consistent update intervals so that the displayed point represents "real time" with respect to other control room instrumentation for the same variable, and is comparable with realistic variable rates of change. Only if the scan intervals associated
with the displayed parameter is correct, should "Satisfactory" be designated. Otherwise, a discrepancy report shall be initiated and recorded.
11. SAFETY RELATED ISOLATION:
All plant input sources for each displayed point shall be compared against the plant instrument index to.
determine if the sensing instrument is safety related. If found to be safety related, the appropriate loop / schematic diagrams shall be reviewed to ensure that an isolation device exists. Only if the isolation
associated with safety related inputs is correct, should "Satisfactory" be designated. Otherwise, a discrepancy
report shall be initiated and recorded.
Should a particular checklist item not pertain to a point, enter NA in the "Satisfactory" column. Upon completion of the checklist, the reviewer shall sign and date the form. A completed and signed form shall exist
for each displayed point.
EIGEN ENGINEERING, INC. 3.4 WPS-1000-88-010 REV. 0
ATTACHMENT 4
Verification of SAS
Documentation Checklists
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: Display Variable Name:
Number P r
Input Name: e-U,,e u Zge /sur5eea
Reqmnts : Variable displayed on:
3.1.1 : Top level: yf 3.3.2 3.3 2 Trend: /f) 60 /&/ %5 Apont Scale: O-- 25-OP5g 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
SAS alarm limits
Low: P9' _// A1/1/,2 Reference: /7 1V7
High: L vQ/:4 AebAl-/71 Reference: _7//___
EOP (CSF) entry value: A/ Ae EOP (CSF): _______
EOP (CSF) control values: _o__ps_ 3
7F0 F0, 3
Input range: /70o-20oo Satisf vs. Satisfactory: 41re/U,00voy x ,
T/O range: O-2$oops y
Algorithm: 15 S
3.2.2 : Calculation order: 4 7'i5
3.2.3 : Scan intervals:
J 3.6.1 * Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by: ,/ Reviewed by:
Date: 2 ff Date: -.2-1?-g-
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /41_11 _ Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name: VPSuXig' 4 , ew
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Yes Trend: 6o 6A,/15 On Scale: 0-/OZ,
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
/X t @rd - Reviewed by:
Date:
SAS alarm limits
Low: _ _ _ _Reference: c17 P7
High: 57 Reference: _ _7_ _ _
EOP (CSF) entry value: Z o EOP (CSF): C__*
EOP (CSF) control values: 32/c* , '-se'
Input range: ____o_ _
VS Satisfactory: Ye 5 I/O range: 0-_007__/
Algorithm:_ _SC4" /5 c ,C
Calculation order: _ __/ _
Scan intervals: _____S
Safety related Isolation: SW /S
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
F.za
a--2 - T
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: &/N 3 Display Variable Name:
Number e
Input Name: -/ /e q,( / f
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Y'ts et'sdef q&
Trend: 0/O Scale: A 0 Ao e
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
Prepared by:
Date:
.44 7- av Reviewed by: 4
Date: __
SAS alarm limits
Low: _ /__ _ e Reference:
High: /AAe Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /vo vl EOP ,(CS):
EOP (CSF) control values: 736-00')e
Input range: 50 -450 bFC F VS Satisfactory:SA s
I/O range: P/AJee- lt k
Algorithm: 5ef/7s
Calculation order: ____s __
Scan intervals: 54 1 /s
Safety related Isolation:
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /'/ L Display Variable Name:
Number / C E 7 o A1~Cokee rFrXLJ r-A
Input Name: /te Ey,/ e/e oeg -Cou /es
Reqmnts : Variable displayed on:
3.1.1 : Top level: e_5
3.3.2 3.3.3 Trend: _(;o__'s___
Scale: / _ _ _
3.1.4
3.3.5 : SAS alarm limits
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
Low: A^OAle Reference:
High: /VoIVe Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: Zh, oF EOP (CSF) F-2,
EOP (CSF) control values: 73CoF F-02.Z
--Zoo 700ooF
Input range: -/00 C~ leoOF VS Satisfactory: Use,'evc/ ',O
I/O range: 1afec ? A' OOFndv
Algorithm: 5# 5
3.2.2 : Calculation order: S_ __s
3.2.3 Scan intervals: 5
3.6.1 : Safety related Isolation: 54A's (Lc s
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Date: __ Date: _
I~v /~;/3 2~ 4
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /____d _ Display Variable Name:
Number re,,44e lesse/ /eve/
Input Name: geAcA 4 e 11desse-/ /e-e/
Reqmnts : Variable displayed on:
3.1.1 : Top level: 'e (vo e')
3.3.2 (; Coe vOw 3.3.3 Trend: '_eav__
3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4-
b4( -re Z c/ s a( e
Scale: /-fo
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/vo-Ae Reference:
High: /Vo If _Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /VeAer EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: dPtZ ______
Input range: __ C VS Satisfactory:
I/O range: /ZeeJ d /ol
Algorithm: A 5
3.2.2 :Calculation order
3.2.3 Scan intervals:
3.6.1 : Safety related Isolation: 515i (54
Prepared by: 1 Reviewed by:
Date: 51 _Date:
-3-__[ _
I
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /_, W- Display Variable Name:
Number Co/ 4/l4,4 lel- A'w
Input Name: 51/6cco/v yety~g .
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
/ 3.2.3
3.6.1
Prepar ed by: ______Reviewed by: J-.r
Date: ,~/'Date: ______
(,ed g,-d 4)
K /~-~2 A?~ r--r-"&I
At ofe / 1!, 5J se C 0./ <Y,-r, Variable displayed on: e " At rue
Top level: Sve,ad c4,4lysi"e 5&//
Trend: KyXold/ Syst'ep, Scale: -/oo k o'f
SAS alarm limits
Low: -. /VOt/ 0 Reference: . - .
High: /V ^At _e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: l.o-a'e EOP (CSF)
EOP (CSF) control values: 30 _ /_oo
Input range: '//e e ' -e e 4C AeWic/ 5417)FM VS Satisfactory: Z/5 eueWCwcy
I/O range: -/,0 -1o 5o F
Algorithm: _____/ __
Calculation order:
Scan intervals: / '
Safety related Isolation: SAhs7-s (Z2CS)
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: AA/L &(/ Number
Fct e o.r /rO Y
Display Variable Name:
Input Name: // /
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Variable displayed on:
Top level: * / FMVt Ce ft'ZcJ
Trend: (Or)_______7 Scale: 5o -/so aF
SAS alarm limits
Low: Al%/ e- Reference:
High: _ aIoAe Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: AIoAle EOP (CSF):
EOP .(CSF) control values: ,voA/C _
Input range: 20- 50-oo*, VS Satisfactory:
I/O range: 5o-/fD S
Algorithm:
Calculation order: ___fs
Scan intervals: _ ____5
Safety related Isolation: F ' "tfo-7
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
2-1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: 19A/Z. 9 Display Variable Name:
Number o0 d ,,. e / /2?ss
Input Name: ~%,v $9,~vA1 es-v / es-see,
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1,
:
Prepared by:
Date:
~, / i~4~'g
Reviewed by:
Date: X-2_-77
Variable .displayed on:
Top level: p4 V-, ( C ^a '^ EienWe(rT /)
Trend: ____,__mwU PR) Scale: -574 2o0 0 s
SAS alarm limits
Low: IV/Ae Reference: 4/ove
High: * Reference: /Vc /
EOP (CSF) entry value: ______y EOP (CSF): -'S
EOP (CSF) control values: ~ /7, y____
Input range: -5/ t foos/D VS Satisfactory: _/5c
I/O range: S 76. S a '/
Algorithm: 541s
Calculation order: SA _/
Scan intervals: AL7 5
Safety related Isolation:
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: 1 Display Variable Name:
Number ;u eh a
Input Name:
Reqmnts : Variable displayed on:
3.1.1 Top level: pA4/ o 6 A no
3.3.2 :e//S: 3.3.3 Trend: 76I!1 v scale: 0-2-2
3.1.4 P0-.22 6et
3.3.5 : SAS alarm limits
: Low: __ Reference: Ne e
High:_ e__L Reference:
3.1.3 EOP (CSF) entry value: No-nI'e EOP (CSF):
3.5.1 : EOP (CSF) control values: 67-
Input range: 0-22 ee/
VS : I/O range: -,22
SAlgorithm: 5A-17s
Satisfactory:
3.2.2 : Calculation order:
3.2.3 Scan intervals: /75
3.6.1 : Safety related Isolation: _ _ __ _
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Date: Date:
/0)/, __(___IV("___- r
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: // Display Variable Name:
Number
Input Name: /
CVA, Oeelvo
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3 .3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
Prepared by:
Date:
4 Reviewed by:
Date: r-_-_t
: Variable displayed on:
* Top level: ( C
Trend: (W me4 T Scale: __
: SAS alarm limits
: Low: Iva__ __ Reference:
: High: I/V_ g 0___Reference:
* EOP (CSF) entry value: /VoAte EOP (CSF):
: EOP (CSF) control values: A/OvO __
Input range: / 2 77z/w a
VS Satisfactory: Co a g / / o
: I/O range: o Xs, s e .
Algorithm: Fdatde
Calculation order: _ _ _ _
Scan intervals: Fa
Safety related Isolation: fa/e As e
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: _t/ _
NumberDisplay Variable Name:
Input Name:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
21 3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
/ 3.2.3
3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Ye5
Trend: e Scale: /-/oo 000 a
SAS alarm limits
Low: 1yo y/e Reference:
High: A/IA/e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /10Ae EOP (CSF):.
EOP (CSF) control values: 2 $ __S
Input range: e -r VS / Satisfactory:
I/O range://Oo ;//
Algorithm: I 5cep 7 v Jr 7
Calculation order: SA/5
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by: . ,
Date:
Reviewed by: / P
Date: 57_-_3 __r&
49
a Alal ^t/. e y/
-1393
:
*
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: AA/1 - Display Variable Name:
Number /9 Ile E-re c,14 oYkd
Input Name:Ag E~ec-/v~ i~d
Reqmnts : Variable displayed on:
3.1.1 : Top level: ePa a ec c^1/e 3.3.2 Sae 6
3.3.3 Trend: Ahines vzS cale: /0 -4 14
3.1.4
SAS alarm limits
Low: /VOA/e Reference:
High: /6 0 0 CPin Reference: /o /
EOP (CSF) entry value: AVo4e EOP (CSF): A1/4
EOP (CSF) control values: /_
/00/0 (a 1F
Input range: -4__s
VS Satisfactory: I/O range: /0 A /0 CP47
Algorithm:
3.2.2 Calculation order:
3.2.3 : Scan intervals: _:__4_h ___
3.6.1 Safety related Isolation: 4 14 fat - 5
Prepared by: A * Reviewed by:
Date: 3_ Date: 3 -8
Ad/~ft
L j~4 Tfo~-~
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
13.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
II
II
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /A1 /3 Display Variable Name:
Number ~ ~~
Input Name:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
(I
3.2.2
.3.2.3
I 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Ae o( 44/ Ae Trend: 4^4 4k 4 si'4,c Scale: /0________
SAS alarm limits
Low: _V __/__ Reference:
High: £000 Of-4 Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: A1o /-e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: Ad_^__
Input range: CA VS .Satisfactory: 5/
I/O range: /o /O P S f
Algorithm: S0 ± og4s
Calculation order: 5
Scan intervals: 5A/5
Safety related Isolation: g1 & 5*9 5
Prepared by: -_
Date: 5
f'&'i /c,/~h9 (O41fr~ 9- L
Reviewed by:
Date: 37_ 3_-8_F
510 & awlk-1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /9 / Number
Display Variable Name:
Input Name:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.23.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3)3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: A10
Trend: _e ______ F / Scale: 0 - 0 (/0') / s//
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/oALe, Reference:
High: _l__A//e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: 4/ow/e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: AvAe
Input range: 4 VS ) Satisfactory: .
I/O range: 0#7
Algorithm: 54/3 6K2/3)
Calculation order:
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation: t 54%s
Prepared by:
Date:
~2 / el/gs A
Reviewed by:
Date: __
d.3~8Iv
ioi~s/&i QQ e#zVk~ 9J~P
I)
9-I
.5 574-/9~ r-cto-
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: AW /5 Display Variable Name: Number 4/6 8 5 F/
Input Name: /26 5
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
/ 3.2.3 AZ 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: A10
Trend: Feec//l/wvy5/An F/k," Scale: 0- /
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/ove Reference:
High: /V_ _e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: Alo -e EOP (CSF):_
EOP (CSF) control values: /ow 1ve
Input range: VS Satisfactory:
I/O range: 0-(/ /
Algorithm: 54/ (CeA.213)
Calculation order:
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date: 5
K4/3 /o/gf AX5
Reviewed by: e
Date:
f
J - 3 r
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: __/_ _/_ Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date: Zz /1Reviewed by:
Date:
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Yes
Trend: S/ei C4 (ye)// scale: -/oo
SAS alarm limits
Low: /5_ _ _Reference: /97/P7
High: _UZ Reference: / -7/e7
EOP (CSF) entry value: '_2Z 'L5 ]EOP (CSF): F-&"*3
EOP (CSF) control values: F-067 03
Input range: 0-/10021 VS Satisfactory: CA nfe C0
I/O range: 0 _St t C
Algorithm: !54 /7
Calculation order: 5-14A45
Scan intervals: _ _ _
Safety related Isolation: 5AA'5
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
*
*
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: AA 1/ Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name:
Variable displayed on:
Top level: eS
Trend: 54A66 4 l/eve/ Scale: O-/0o1
SAS al
Low:
High:
EOP (C
EOP (C
arm limits
__________o __ Reference: /V7 P7
6___ 'Reference: /Y7/e 7
SF) entry value: 7, D87 EOP (CSF): FA -3 SF) control values: <__7___ F-0s3
_____F-0,3
Input range: -/0oot_0 VS
I/O range: O/a'1
Algorithm: _4175
Calculation order;
Scan intervals: 543
Safety related Isolation: _ ___
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Satisfactory: PsclP CA
P -Z-81' 2 -8r
5~ / /W A le /4,/ ,, 1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /___O Display Variable Name:
Number
Input Name: ch' //M
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
113.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
f 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: _1 _9
Trend: d/4,7 Z K7< ^ Scale:
SAS alarm limits
Low: __/_ 0 _V_ e Reference:
High: /Vo /e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /V0/ e EOP (CSF):_
EOP (CSF) control values: N/OA/ e
Input range: VS Satisfactory: IO /A
I/O range: 0-50 9LpPft
Algorithm: :reyry' - s
Calculation order:
Scan intervals: _ ___5
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date:
,Ve / 01r
A ~//4-~ Reviewed by: C9 E&7
Date: 5_-_ 3-8 8
0 -/,5-0 6 ? w
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /_ _ Display Variable Name: Number
//a,. /r,41z)
Input Name: //a vb( /0i"-
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
I 3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
/ 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: A/o
Trend: C 0y),w Scale: O0'O 6kPA
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/pale Reference:
High: /vo e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: ;VA/ve EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: A/lw e
Input range: VS Satisfactory: P/ e 7c
I/O range: 6_-S_,_ n .tf or
Algorithm:
Calculation order: 5 SA
Scan intervals: /AJ5
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
J -
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: AI fl Display Variable Name:. Number
Input Name:
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Ye s
Trend: S4^ (w , es1 Scale: 0 -/11a/,s y
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Calculation order: 51f/S
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation: 5#71,
Prepared by:
Date: 3/ 2/ffReviewed by:
Date: _ -. 2-__ __
SAS alarm limits
Low: 5O0 P 7 Reference: /1Y7/'7
High: /050 PS F Reference: 17/j y
EOP (CSF) entry value: A/oa e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: __ _f5 _-0. *3
Input range: _-__you__,_
VS Satisfactory: le5 I/O range: V-/'oo ety
Algorithm: 17
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
/A.- /essd
Verification of SAS Documentation
*SAS Point: 3/ &2 Display Variable Name: Number Y,6 P/tessude
Input Name:
: Variable displayed on:
Top level: _ _ _
Trend: S Af 7W KS cale: ____ S______
: SAS alarm limits
Low: 500 P', Reference: '7/o0
* High: /0oS7 Reference: /'f7/O7
: EOP (CSF) entry value: /_V_ _ EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: P 3
: Input range: VS Satisfactory: . 5
I/O range: 0 -/ds5'
Algorithm: 6 5
Calculation order: 5/#
Scan intervals: 5-A5
Safety related Isolation: _5_ _7s
Prepared by:
Date: 3/ d'J2
Reviewed by:
Date: _ _ _ _ _
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
___
____
__
_
*
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: _______
NumberDisplay Variable Name:
- 51! .lea/ "rxq 06
Input Name:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3 3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
31
1 2/
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
: Variable displayed on:
: Top level: /Vo
Trend: f 5 Abdz. Scale: ____________
: SAS alarm limits
: Low: __/ __ e Reference:
: High: Al/c?_ve Reference:
: EOP (CSF) entry value: A/o e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: /701P fF .
: Input range: 5A17 VS Satisfactory:
: I/O range: ,-e (o s4
Algorithm:
: Calculation order:
: Scan intervals: 7 L4A-S
: Safety related Isolation: 64, Aei 5--24 5
Prepared by: st( ,
Date: f__
~?ef// S//~ K q^9
Reviewed by:
Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ _
5( Fe6 / F/&-'
d
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: I;//&Z,7 Number
Display Variable Name:
5/e bc/ 47, A
Input Name: j s e2 leod Vews
Variable displayed on:
Top level: NO
Trend: ________/_ Scale: o-9 /1s/Ae(fo09
SAS alarm limits
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
*2.v-- / /3/e8 '(
lrvz111F
Reviewed by:
Date: __ rr5/31M
&f3-8
Low: /o _ e Reference:
High: A/erve Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: A{o^/- EOP (CSF):
EOP. (CSF) control values: '.2Olp/w1
Input range: VS Satisfactory: _ _ePc 3o
I/O range: q ) Si t .
Algorithm: & lye M.
Calculation order: S _
Scan intervals: gy t :3 - 5
Safety related Isolation: Pe1 ( 'L.
31
I I Al
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: A__.__
NumberDisplay Variable Name:
Input Name: I/l! ', L
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
1 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level:
Trend: 44 de &70 77l Scale: So- Ze / k-1/< /e A e (ir)71// 5 62- 6 o F
SAS alarm limits
Low: /__^ __ e- Reference:
High: A/a_ __ Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: A/o l/ EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: /MoVa
Input range: 5-6529 b' F VS Satisfactory:
I/O range: 5o06Jo ,e1.
Algorithm: hm_5
Calculation order: _ _ _ _
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation: o;:__:____-_____r
i- A-/I;Prepared by:
Date: 2
Reviewed by: E =
Date: r-_z _-rr
-9
tq &Ie; q-,9
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: / 31 Display Variable Name:
Number rem
I n put N am e: Zey Z1-,' 4,a g
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
21 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Ala
Trend: F'/e 2Ah4t 7 C7 Scale: 5- - 6 ,0 0 &,Icl7/e (AM,)7//,rTC Iszo -620 07 F
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/od/e Reference:
High: /Vo/v e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: Alolve EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: rdoste
Input range: 5o-65- 2PeF VS ' Satisfactory: /4 5
I/O range: Fo D0 F
Algorithm:______
Calculation order: S___
Scan intervals: ____s
Safety related Isolation: 5-A
-3ir
Prepared by: 6 61 Reviewed by:
Date: _ _ _ _ _Date:
*
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /VL f9 Number
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
I 3.6.1
Display Variable Name:
Input Name: 60// /e 7e1 / A5
: Variable displayed on:
: Top level: KeS
Trend: ______ _7f Scale: o6oo bY2 F ,le e (Ate)7//70 362o-62o De; F
: SAS alarm limits
Low: 520ty /vF ALI/7 Reference: AZ7 i Lo: ,55~/f 7 ,Iv7L
High: 5_S____F___e__1/73 Reference: 197/'7
: EOP (CSF) entry value: 4 oorv-fO,., EOP (CSF): / -- AZ
: EOP (CSF) control values: '27o"F 4_
S3 0 0 oF ______,
* Input range: 5o6b7P F VS Satisfactory:. V
: I/O range: j5o 620 F
Algorithm: t A± .
Calculation order: 5_ _ _5
Scan intervals: IS-11 5
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Date: Date:
_, P, , n :Date:Date:
'r
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: Al/.-N 3 Number
Display Variable Name:
Input Name: C l/ Aed 7* /a,
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Yes
Trend: Scale: -f' -6,o / ,e F -52-,2o v 7 p
: SAS alarm limits
Low: f 204eD § 71he /7 Reference: 1'747
* High: 55'O(P F/bA A'VI/73 Reference: '97/7 : EOP (CSF) entry value: /EOP (CSF): ______
EOP (CSF) control values: >'.27i'oF
F-oq
Input range: 50-a-o 6ve VS
I/O range: 5o-620 Ve FSatisfactory: - ?e s
Algorithm: 50h 75
Calculation order:
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation: -t
Prepared by:
Date:I 5A p gg
Reviewed by: J C. Zi Date: J_ -2PF
~~-r / //~gA~1
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
k,-de FA te 7 3 Andce /?A7 e(1V)7R7p
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
5 75
501 .5
tol(,J ff
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: A/V Q 37 Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name: 14 4c4 c-7wv
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 21.3.1
3.3.4
3.2.2
1 3.2.3 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: 05 o/ le
Trend: /NO
S a e 7d'v' ,/9 ' evAew de
Scale:
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/ov/e Reference:
High: A/oAle Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: Aloi/e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: Deee,4s6,a F-''
Input range: CA__ __ _ /_
IOVSange: _ _ _ _ _ _ Satisfactory:
Algorithm: v 4'
Calculation order: 5
Scan intervals: eP k 5 c j,4
Safety related Isolation: 5 Zcas)
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Date: Date:
/53 g - 3 -9-- -A
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /9AL. 3' Display Variable Name: Number S E
Input Name: S7 c- JA
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
/ 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: A0
Trend: 4 RoeA, /V, 5 Scale: /O71/v0 C ,0
SAS alarm limits
Low: IVd^ve Reference:
High: A/o __ Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: _Vo___f EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: /vo__ _
Input range: A 6 J.A/ VS i Satisfactory: 3
I/O range: /0 14 / C/ ,
Algorithm:
Calculation order: 5
Scan intervals: ____75
Safety related Isolation: Z4 s
Prepared by:
Date:
/ lolyle/ /c//f ~
Reviewed by:
Date: J_ - 3-83'T5< 3, F
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS. Point: /_____ Display Variable Name:
Number S /Le/ /eve/
Input Name: ScOaVece
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Aroti. Set b/s Variable displayed on:
Top level: Vf5l Intss/He/
Trend: /V 14e vlel Scale: / 94 /0 6?/'5
SAS alarm limits
Low: A!/Ote Reference:
High: A/oVe- Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: A/loaAe EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: A/ow_ _
Input range: 5A-54s VS Satisfactory:
I/O range: /0 0k/S
Algorithm: hm:____
Calculation order: _ _75
Scan intervals: _ A __ _
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by: F ,
Date: 5- -_.3 -<'8
1&nevy / w el/
:
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name: Cfetd e/- /&A1 ede 2/e/
Variable displayed on:
Top level: ___ _A/
Trend: C/ Sl415 _,4 Scale: 0-/oo:0;C __
SAS alarm limits
Low: /V^e Reference:
High: N1v_ o_ le-Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /aw EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: l/voae-
Input range: 0-10_1o
VS I/O range: /0o0
Algorithm: mA5
Satisfactory: V-s
3.2.2
3.2.3
if 3.6.1
Calculation order; 5_ __s
Scan intervals: _ ____
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by: 4 ; A L
Date: V2Reviewed by:
Date:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
dec-7e d
Input Name: d /f /^/01 eAlc 4
Variable displayed on:
Top level: _ /Vo
Trend: /vo7&e-
S c a eA b c _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Scale:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
-7 £Reviewed by:
Date:
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/o1'e Reference:
High: A/oAAF'e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /Va/v -e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: e-l_
Input range: __/___
VS Satisfactory: _________
I/O range: /Vi /?.fct,(12
Algorithm: Ao/ /Red
Calculation order: ____ e_____
Scan intervals: F,_ -e____2
Safety related Isolation: Mo0 Ft-f Powk
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /______ Display Variable Name:
Number
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /V17__
Number
4 aF~J e Po II /vo C aN./ec/? L'
Display Variable Name:
Input Name: ) W.S 7b
Variable displayed on:
Top level: NO
Trend: AhA/ Ze8v (s Scale: 9-/0 %p
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/voe- Reference:
High: A/oCAe Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /Vowe EOP (CSF):_
EOP (CSF) control values: Aowe
Input range: -/ oo , VS
I/O range: 0_-_oo%,
Algorithm: 5$AS
Satisfactory: PC'
Calculation order: 5,1k/s
Scan intervals: SA$IS
Safety related Isolation: 5
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by: ?
Date: ____2 -_ __
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
/ 3.6.1
_
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: _________ Display Variable Name:
Number 5k e e A
F* 1a/ e Io Aa0 Input Name: vd 1a/,,74 e 7rd # deve/
Variable displayed on:
Top level: f
Trend: 1 e# Scale: c5-/O
SAS alarm limits
Low: Ac,, e- Reference:
High: / e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: A/e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: /Vov e
Input range: 0-/"o
VS I/O range: o-/,904
Algorithm: SA#7-
Satisfactory: /4-S
Calculation order: ____
Scan intervals: SI/ lee ,,ed/
Safety related Isolation: /_, -,1e7^_ 4,
Prepared by:
Date:
s/2/- g Reviewed by: _ _ _ _ _
Date: _-__ _
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /tAJS9 Display Variable Name:
Number /o
Input Name: 6 /c 6'oo/ yr
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by: 42&Date: _ _13
4 / //'/g/0
Reviewed by: __ __
Date:
Variable displayed on:
Top level: 5
Trend: AIU7 / /d ke &,AScale: 0-5010 GP
SAS alarm limits
Low: //o)- Reference:
.High: Ate - Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /I/o vP EOP (CSP):
EOP (CSF) control values: Ao e
Input range: 7 VS Satisfactory:
I/O range: 6-f0 :'f
Algorithm:
Calculation order: _ _/s
Scan intervals: _A_5
Safety related Isolation:
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
I3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /Z-&63 Display Variable Name: Number / ,J
Input Name: 8 8 AUX bee(Xe
Variable displayed on:
Top level: e5
Trend: Aix eA' O ( 5 Scale: O-- 5oo 6?-n
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
A34 3q /- q
Reviewed by: -P. £Q Date: __ __ __ _
SAS alarm limits
Low: A_ o e Reference:
High: Ivolve Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /Vo WP EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: /Va ve
0 Soof01 Input range: 67
VS Satisfactory: 5 541 I/O range: p-you
Algorithm:
Calculation order:
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation:
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
:
:
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /cM58 Number
*F F4M ee f por tfLo
Q,,gle l a
Display Variable Name:
Input Name: CA -48 e Aver , , e
: Variable displayed on:
Top level: d/ re /d ae
Trend: Scale:
: SAS alarm limits
: Low:
High:
/de
AlvoI e
EOP (CSF) entry value:
Reference:
Reference:
A1A/le EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: Xf2 bo Pa/9ev, F-O*/
Input range: o
VS Satisfactory: I/O range: cI q
Algorithm: 65t?4 s 5
Calculation order:
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation: d1A 3- .5 7s
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Date:/ /
Date: 6 3-S
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
I3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1/
SX /%0e A e'f /,9-,4A6 /C /PVZ / PoW4444L -e7~3 ~ -17 -i~ AV #/IOdRA
'e-13le "?
t0l(plW( j,9
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: AAGII5c Display Variable Name: Number. .
Input Name: 2o.- ge A'Se /;xr
No
: Variable displayed on:
Top level: Ye_ _5_4____ __)__e4
: Trend: a//'c-,i, T1v! ' Scale:
tel f SeA y' shlf4'
: SAS alarm limits
: Low: //o_ __ Reference:
: High: /VoAve Reference:
* EOP (CSF) entry value: _ _o _EOP (CSF): *
: EOP (CSF) control values: A/o, e._
* Input range: 0-4207v VS a,
: I/O range: o-720/o
Algorithm: 5fe/5
Satisfactory: Ye- -.
3.2.2
3.2.3
J 3.6.1
: Calculation order: 451 '.5
Scan intervals: 5,f_7 s
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date: __ _ -_ _ _
Io//i 9
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
A/, / /0/ ltf f
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: AA'LS6& Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name: I5f Aa x (/d 4)
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
I 3.6.1
,vo/el se1 b sb*ac Variable displayed on:
Top level: yeS(Ite551 e We#),vo ef
Trend: ______e_ 2_ _sScale: -O41 /O -145
SAS alarm limits
Low: /VoA__e Reference:
High: A/olve Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: A/cl e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: ,ve _e
Input range: 1 5 VS -3 Satisfactory:
I/O range:/O 1j 4,45
Algorithm:
Calculation order: 5 5
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation: A'5CfZ!b "'32
Prepared by:
Date:
raz//q'8i
5/3/ 9 I 0/(/" q4_9
Reviewed by:
Date: ~9-3 _-t
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: A1-/ / Number
Display Variable Name:
Input Name:
Variable displayed on:
Top level: 6o/SLA I
Trend: 14 a.-JAI
SAS al
Low:
High:
EOP (C
EOP (C
Input VS
Scale: /1vol/ C ,P
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3' 3.5.1
I/O range: /0 -o/
Algorithm: 54$I
Calculation order: 5_____s
Scan intervals: S/l S
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date: 5-- 3- r8
arm. limits
/___/e Reference:
Al,/Oe Reference:
SF) entry value: /VOA/e EOP (CSF):
SF) control values: lvow-e_
range: 0Z55 6= C Satisfactory: S__,__s
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
4t 0 G IS-I 01
6av Z ee48l I 6>V- /
:
Verification of SAS Documentation
.SAS Point: iq/L/ 16, Number
Variable displayed on:
Top level: (o SA aw
Trend: ^/ / o
SAS alarm
Scale: /Ov- /02 Cps
limits
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Calculation order: 5A74 S
Scan intervals: _ _ _ _
Safety related Isolation: /
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by: .r .£ Date: _ -_ _ 3 -__
/eel-/&
5 7, 23
Low: A/Ode Reference:
High: /1v-v e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: Ialv EOP (CSF):_
EOP (CSF) control values: AA)/V ____
Input range: 2"5A45 VS 6 Satisfactory: 5 s
I/ r ianhge:m/ ,_ _
Algorithm: 4
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Display Variable Name:
Input Name: Sk Fo ar IV-32
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: Aql,/Z/ 3 Display Variable Name:
Number
Input Name: F_ 1_CFl/ou_ _ _
Variable displayed on:
Top level: 6/ &A
Trend: 16 S4dowA Scale: 0 -'oo0d76}^)
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
/O/40/1 9,C19
Reviewed by: _ _.
Date: 5_- 3 -81r
SAS alarm limits
Low: oAl Reference:
High: Ao_ __e- Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: ivoYe EOP (CSF):.
EOP (CSF) control values: A/o-"e_ _
Input range: 10 9 5 Yo Ss , e ,eed
VS Satisfactory: 40t 1o I/O range: _-</oco
Mtse
Algorithm: *sev 9
Calculation order: 541s
Scan intervals: _____
Safety related Isolation: " R
1 3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4'
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: __/__ Display Variable Name:
Number 9 1,./'eY 7 e s
Input Name:
Variable displayed on:
Top level: __// ____
Trend: 6// S_ scale: :o'5- DEGF
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
A;< /,,~4 o/Ce(( cv
Reviewed by:
Date: 5 _- 2 -Vor*
SAS alarm limits
Low: /VA1e Reference:
High: ANoIJe Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /oale EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: lAo-"e
Input range: 6O- "'6O IDE6 F VS Satisfactory: yes
I/O range: 5 - De6 F
Algorithm: SAIs_ _
Calculation order: 5_14_1 __s
Scan intervals: 4A/s
Safety related Isolation: ;e9944+ 's
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: A_______ Number
Display Variable Name:
Hie 1 9 a 1-1eWn/
Input Name: //Y /y ot/ /ac//e 7
Variable displayed on:
Top level: __a___
Trend: //
SAS al
Low:
High:
EOP (C
EOP (C
arm
Scale: 5 A V5o DE'c F
limits
/VCo W Reference:
A/o aReference:
SF) entry value: I/6 41e EOP (CSF):_
SF) control values: A/OAle
Input range: 5o-VroftOEG F VS Satisfactory: __5
I/O range: ,O-VSO/PEC F
Algorithm: S5ft/s
Calculation order: SAs
Scan intervals: SA7/s
Safety related Isolation: S 'v L-9 S
Prepared by:
Date:
Al / 1 ~
Reviewed by:
Date: 5--7 -_r _
/ A J'
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /lil- /7/ Display Variable Name: Number C S /Fess g' l& U
Input Name: -cz 4,4 , 0 ,d r/I4
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Ile //' o
Trend: /V Scale:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Calculation order: 5
Scan intervals: _# _5
Safety related Isolation: At
Prepared by:
Date: ~(-2a -5~'Reviewed by:
Date:
SAS alarm limits
Low: A__ _ _ Reference:
High: C,41 Cu/k ' Reference: P
EOP (CSF) entry value: /VaIfe EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: y/o, A,_re_
Input range: 7 ,5O PEc F VS Satisfactory: /4
I/O range:
Algorithm: _____
:
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /1l / /7Z Number
Display Variable Name:
,FCs Pess Z.j /
Input Name: feAC/'A e /
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: /o w/
Trend: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Scale:
: SAS alarm limits
Low: CA CdA eIReference: /_____c
: High: /Vo_ _ e Reference:. ________
EOP (CSF) entry value: A/ EOP. (CSF):
: EOP (CSF) control values: N10
Input range: -50 DEG F : VS Satisfactory: 4
I/O range: A.
Algorithm:_ _ _
Calculation order: _____
Scan intervals: 9_ __75
Safety related Isolation: A
Prepared by:
Date:
- RveReviewed by:
Date: S--2 - tr
AI(X
:
:
:
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: #A Display Variable Name:
Number 6I7nNe2 /4tess
Input Name: ,cs es
Variable displayed on:
Top level: #// do/o,
Trend: ANO Scale: A/
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
_yJ L d-Reviewed by:
Z/A2 JDate:
SAS alarm limits
Low: M/o /e Reference: None
High: al//4i L Reference: /___/_'__2
EOP (CSF) entry value: I/oI/e EOP (CSP): .
EOP (CSF) control values: Avow e
Input range: ___oo___
VS Satisfactory: / F I/O range:
Algorithm: _____
Calculation order: _
Scan intervals: $A S
Safety related Isolation: /
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /fA -/741 Display Variable Name: Number o/d Z 4
Input Name: CSp;es
Variable displayed on:
Top level: flo/d
Trend: Al10 Scale: d/0
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Calculation order: ____5
Scan intervals: _ A__'S
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date: -___ __
: SAS alarm limits
Low: CA/C / Reference: /________
: High: A/ode Reference: 14/A#'t
: EOP (CSF) entry value: /______ EOP (CSF):
: EOP (CSF) control values: 4 " .
: Input range: 03ovop5 y VS Satisfactory: 4V/
I/O range: . '... 4
Algorithm: __ ____
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
:
:
:
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: (O290 Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name: / /Ze wf s,
Variable displayed on:
Top level: Le5 1e 0/ -fOt/0 (,P,1
Trend: AVO Scale:- V/x
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
; V/o //C//ep
Reviewed by: 2- <
Date: f--3-t'
so4 /&(egl
SAS alarm limits
Low: _____v_ e Reference:
High: _ /___e_ Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /A/oie EOP (CSP):
EOP (CSF) control values: A/ov
Input range: VS Satisfactory: Lsc 4 ' '53
I/O range: -- 50 v 7/537,%
Algorithm:m:___
Calculation order: ___s
Scan intervals: _ A_ _5
Safety related Isolation: A(
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: ( Display Variable Name:
Number
Pk'~ ~ a/'/ -c'/ --/nput Name:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: CM
Trend: /V,2 Scale:
SAS alarm limits
Low: _____ _Reference:
High: / _ e Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: wDe EOP (CSF):
EOP.(CSF) control values: /1v e_
Input range: NACTM/ C/ . VS
I/O range: _ /_____ _4_ ,/_
Algorithm:
Satisfactory: /
Calculation order: 5#-75
Scan intervals: fr4,1e
Safety related Isolation: 7 /' 77-
Prepared by:
Date: ~/2/~' ~'
Reviewed by:
Date:
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
fe ed lAjle-.e
________
, ,
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: .,DT6L VDisplay Variable Name: Number
Input Name: d 7T £'sk. T ,
Variable displayed on:
Top level: GSYAfawwe, t)
Trend: A/O Scale:
SAS alarm limits
Low: /Yo_ ' e Reference:
High: /awwe- Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: P EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: Al_____e_
Input range: ____0/____
VS I/O range: ___C____rI_
Algorithm:_ ___A__5
Satisfactory: 5
Calculation order: _____
Scan intervals: -P ±b - .s
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
I 3.2.3
j 3.6.1
S-3 -8~a~e (6q-9
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: TO L93 Display Variable Name: Number e
/oo v Input Name: 6 ~~v,v iec e 7a
Reqmnts : Variable displayed on:
3.1.1 Top level: es(tes/;e Ah A) 3.3.2 3.3.3 : Trend: /VO S 3.1.4
3.3.5 : SAS alarm limits
3.1.3 3.5.1
cale: A
Low: M/on f Reference:
High: AZDIVt_ Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /p-de EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: ldAe.
Input range: 1 to/ .&-ls VS
I/O range: -W t/5
Algorithm: +
Satisfactory: 4'F5
Calculation order: / 5
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation: /
Prepared by:
Date:
3 / &4t Reviewed by:
Date: _ -_.2 -__
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: b Display Variable Name: Number 4
Input Name: $54/ l-rVec cAov -
Variable displayed on:
Top level: (/efS4v Af/
Trend: /VO Scale:
SAS al
Low:
High:
EOP (C
EOP (C
IV/
arm limits
_ lO_ _ e Reference:
/Un/id Reference:
SF) entry value: Alo ve EOP (CSF):
SF) control values: Alphov e_
Input range: &/0/AT/2A VS
I/O range: __/^_____V _
Algorithm: 51AI5
Satisfactory: L
Calculation order: 5414
Scan intervals:
Safety related Isolation: 7Y/5CfPAA Yf 3
Prepared by:
Date:
/ /o/1,y ,4u
Reviewed by: r L
Date: __ __ __ _
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
(13.2.3 3.6.1
-5Z- $2Z
/ oft, ?CO
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: 47D776 /(Q Display Variable Name: Number ;,, k [vep,, L /wee
f a 12eee c/0 . I ,1 Inp ut Name:
Variable displayed on:
Top level: ies Trend: A/0 Scale:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date: _I-_- -td
SAS alarm limits
Low: /tloe e Reference:
High:/A-"/ /LOPeed Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: k'ov_ EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: A/Vae e
f,~s6 2CP5 Input range: Lee/ O-fZhe
VS Satisfactory:
I/O range: //
Algorithm: - 5
Calculation order: _ _ _
Scan intervals: 5_ _
Safety related Isolation:
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
7
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: .IlT(// Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name: 4if FJT'eAy2 4'vc/ 516
Variable displayed on:
Top level:
Trend: A16) Scale: -V//
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
Prepared by:
Date:
A~V/ //~/~ W
/~ 6 2~~-- 3
Reviewed by:
Date: _ _ _ _ _
SAS alarm limits
Low: A/o /- Reference: AIR1 eJ-ecIOVi Cfi41
High: 2 /ceday 6O00 c,/0 Reference: /''e2
EOP (CSF) entry value: Al'ol e EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: /Vale-_
Input range: -r-, VS Satisfactory: //
I/O range: __ _ _
Algorithm: 5
Calculation order: ____
Scan intervals: _ _ _ _
Safety related Isolation:
1/ 3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
I
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: rDIG/G5 Display Variable Name: Number ,/ of o/1 -Ole /
4 ,4sdp.4I/- Input Name: KteCfc4eC0IUA0
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
I)
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: eId/
Trend: A0 Scale:
SAS alarm limits
Low: _ /VO/e Reference:
High: Alo^xe Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: A/6 l/e ' EOP (CSF):
od epamo EOP (CSF) control values: /7 z
Input range: 9i 7r VS Satisfactory: 5
A/o range: "
A lgor ithm: 5,f?7
Calculation order:
Scan intervals: 5_4_/5
Safety related Isolation: _,___s
Prepared by:
Date:
~4 o/~/~ ~
Reviewed by: _4r_ _ ._
Date: 6___3_-&r
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: N90Z96 Display Variable Name:
Number
Input Name: SA, k-31Cou&,d
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
32 3.2.2
3.2.3
1/ 3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level: '58 d o4 tpo, 7
Trend: u'1 /</ 0//2 0-oA4cale:
SAS alarm limits
Low: _ _/_ Reference:
High: Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values: _ _
Input range: ' As v s VS _ Satisfactory:
I/O range: /0 Oo /OeCf:s
Algorithm: A*A4
Calculation order: 5_ __s
Scan intervals: _ ____
Safety related Isolation: AFE 6 S
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date: 5-- 3 -1V-k
~/2-0 / <zuTV-
Verification of SAS Documentation
SAS Point: /V'!'3&G Display Variable Name: Number
Input Name: A c d
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
13.2.1 13.3.1
3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
/3.6.1
Variable displayed on:
Top level:
Trend: &/4eWl 4 Re01PO"/58cale:
SAS alarm limits
Low: / _ __ Reference:
High: ___ __ Reference:
EOP (CSF) entry value: /VL42 EOP (CSF):
EOP (CSF) control values:
Input range: VS Satisfactory: _4____
I/O range: /0" V /0
Algorithm: 4
Calculation order: _ _ _
Scan intervals: _ _ _ _
Safety related Isolation: e/ -
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date: 3 -~i'
SAS Point: 5(_f?_ Number
-j
Verification of SAS Documentation
Display Variable Name: ________
IC20 Woee Z/a 4la41r
Input Name: x7 4 7iits /
lex &v, e
Variable displayed on:
Top level: /_a/_,__ec__
Trend: ,/o^ e
SAS al
Low:
High:
EOP (C
EOP (C
arm
Scale:
limits
/Ale l Reference:
A/to.Ie Reference:
SF) entry value: /of'" EOP (CSF):
SF) control values: Aoai_
Tp/NT~tF
Input range: VS Satisfactory: 5
I/O range -7/0-0
Algorithm: 6A45
Calculation order: ____
Scan intervals: 5/IKS
Safety related Isolation:
Prepared by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Reqmnts
3.1.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.1.4
3.3.5
3.1.3 3.5.1
3.2.1 3.3.1 3.3.4
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.6.1
f) G