results and discussion class numbermean std. deviatio dft-valuep-value class a4739.3213.52 911.55.13...

18
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class Number Mean Std. Deviatio df t-Value p-Value Class A 47 39.3 2 13.5 2 91 1.55 .13 Class B 46 35.6 5 8.83 Comparison of Stress Perception Grade Between Class A and Class B Table 4.9 *P .05 RQ 1: According to the first hypotheses on (Table 4.9~12) To know high or low achievers’ attitude towards English stress learning and the present English stress learning.?

Upload: chester-green

Post on 13-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Class Number Mean

Std. Deviati

odf t-Value p-Value

Class A

4739.3

213.5

291 1.55 .13

Class B

4635.6

5 8.83

Comparison of Stress Perception Grade Between Class A and Class BTable 4.9

*P< .05

RQ 1: According to the first hypotheses on (Table 4.9~12) :To know high or low achievers’ attitude towards English stress learning and the present English stress learning.?

Page 2: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Class Number Mean

Std. Deviati

odf t-Value p-Value

Class A

4768.0

06.80

91 3.27 .002*Class

B46

35.65

8.83

Comparison of Stress Production Grade Between Class A and Class B

Table 4.10

*P< .05

Page 3: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Pearson’sProduct-MomentCorrelation

Average Grade

Perception Grade

Production Grade

Average Grade - .369* .284

Perception Grade .369* - .518*

Production Grade .284 .518* -

Comparison of the Relationship Among Semester Average Grade, Stress Perception Grade and Stress Production Grade in Class A

Table 4.11

*P< .05

Page 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Pearson’sProduct-MomentCorrelation

Average Grade

Perception Grade

Production Grade

Average Grade - .026 .284

Perception Grade .026 - .074

Production Grade .261 .074 -

Comparison of the Relationship Among Semester Average Grade, Stress Perception Grade and Stress Production Grade in Class B

Table 4.12

*P< .05

Page 5: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item Options FrequencyPercentag

e

1. How much time doyou spend on teachingEnglish stress in oneclass (45 minutes)?

More than 25minutes. 0 0﹪

15 to 25 minutes. 0 0﹪

10 to 15 minutes. 1 11.1﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress TeachingTable 4.5(1)

RQ 2: According to the second hypotheses on (Table 4.5~7) : To understand teachers’ attitude towards English stress teaching and the current English stress teaching.

Page 6: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item Options FrequencyPercentag

e

1. How much time doyou spend on teachingEnglish stress in oneclass (45 minutes)?

5 to 10 minutes. 1 11.1﹪

Less than 5minutes. 6 66.7﹪

No. 1 11.1﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress TeachingTable 4.5(2)

RQ 2: According to the second hypotheses on (Table 4.5~7) : To understand teachers’ attitude towards English stress teaching and the current English stress teaching.

Page 7: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item Options FrequencyPercentag

e

2. If you have time,which part would youchoose to enhancestudents’ Englishability?

Grammar. 1 11.1﹪

Vocabulary proficiency. 2 22.2﹪

Translation. 1 11.1﹪

Listening comprehen

sion.5 55.6﹪

Pronunciation. 0 0﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress Teaching

Table 4.5(3)

Page 8: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item OptionsFrequen

cyPercenta

ge

3. Which part would you pay more attention to when students speak English?

Pronounce each word

clearly.6 66.7﹪

The stress and intonation of

the whole sentence are fluent

and natural.

1 11.1﹪

Both. 2 22.2﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress Teaching

Table 4.5(4)

Page 9: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item OptionsFrequen

cyPercenta

ge

4. Do you explain clearly and make students practice when you encounter a new stress pattern?

Never. 0 0﹪

Sometimes. 7 77.8﹪

Often. 2 22.2﹪

5. Do you correct students’ misplacement in stress?

Never. 4 44.5﹪

Sometimes. 3 33.3﹪

Often. 2 22.2﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress Teaching

Table 4.5(5)

Page 10: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item OptionsFreque

ncyPercent

age

6. When you need to read the dialogues or readings aloud in the class, would you emphasize the stress?

Never. 0 0﹪

Sometimes. 5 55.6﹪

Often. 4 44.4﹪

7. What would you do if

you ask students to read the dialogues or readings aloud?

Ask students to read after your.

4 44.5﹪

Ask students to read after the

teaching CDs.

3 33.3﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress Teaching

Table 4.5(6)

Page 11: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item OptionsFreque

ncyPercent

age

8. Did you ever notice that your stress placement differed from that of the teaching CDs?

Never. 0 0﹪

Sometimes. 7 77.8﹪

Often. 2 22.2﹪

9. What would you do if your stress placement differs from that of the teaching CDs?

Adopt your placement. 0 0﹪

Use the placement of the teaching CDs.

5 55.6﹪

Not sure. 4 44.4﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress Teaching

Table 4.5(7)

Page 12: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item OptionsFreque

ncyPercent

age

10. What do you think of

teaching English

stress in junior high

school?

Very easy. 0 0﹪

Difficult. 5 55.6﹪

OK. 4 44.4﹪

12. Is it important to

teach English stress

in English

instruction?

No. 0 0﹪

Not essential. 2 22.2﹪

Very important 7 77.8﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress Teaching

Table 4.5(8)

Page 13: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item OptionsFreque

ncyPercent

age

14. How do the high-achieved

students perform in English stress compared to the low

achieved students?

Better. 6 66.7﹪

Almost the

same.3 33.3﹪

Worse. 0 0﹪

The Frequency and Percentage of Teachers’ Responses to English Stress Teaching

Table 4.5(9)

Page 14: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item OptionsFreque

ncy Rank

11. What difficulties

do you often

encounter while

you are teaching

English stress?

Students are unable to

understand.

6 (66.6 )﹪ 1st

No enough explanations in the textbook.

5 (55.5 )﹪ 2nd

No enough practices in the textbook.

5 (55.5 )﹪ 2nd

Too many students in one class.

4 (44.4 )﹪ 3rd

No enough time.4

(44.4 )﹪ 3rd

Ranking of the Difficulties for Teachers to Teach English Stress

Table 4.6(1)

Page 15: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Item OptionsFreque

ncy Rank

11. What difficulties

do you often

encounter while

you are teaching

English stress?

Low motivation because stress is not tested in exams.

4 (44.4 )﹪ 3rd

The stress in the teaching CDs is unnatural..

3 (33.3 )﹪ 4th

Too many students in one class.

2 (22.2 )﹪ 5th

Unable to correct students’ stress errors.

2 (22.2 )﹪ 5th

Ranking of the Difficulties for Teachers to Teach English Stress

Table 4.6(2)

Page 16: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Words F % 1st %2nd % MS % UM %

preview

19 40 - - 16 84 2 11 1 5

Sunday

25 53 - - 23 92 2 8 0 0

movie 24 51 - - 22 92 1 4 1 4

Frequency and Percentage of High Achievers’ Perception Errors of the Stress Fall in the First Syllable in Bi-syllable Words

Table 4.13(1)

RQ 3: According to the third hypotheses on (Table 4.13) : To understand teachers’ attitude towards English stress teaching and the current English stress teaching.

The Erroneous Syllable or Conditions

Page 17: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Words F % 1st %2nd % MS % UM %

seafood

19 40 - - 16 84 2 11 1 5

taxi 25 53 - - 23 92 2 8 0 0

limit 24 51 - - 22 92 1 4 1 4

teacher

20 43 - - 16 18 4 20 0 0

carry 7 15 - - 6 86 0 0 1 14

visit 20 43 - - 17 85 2 10 1 5

Table 4.13(2)

The Erroneous Syllable or Conditions

Page 18: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Class NumberMean Std. Deviatio dft-Valuep-Value Class A4739.3213.52 911.55.13 Class B4635.658.83 Comparison of Stress Perception

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Words F % 1st %2nd % MS % UM %

forty 19 40 - - 16 84 2 11 1 5

Mean

44% - 86% 10 4

Table 4.13(3)

The Erroneous Syllable or Conditions

Note. 1. Two words not contained in the textbooks are boldly marked. 2. 1st = the first syllable; 2nd = the second syllable; MS = multi-stress; UM = unable to mark