resolutions: 15, 5 and 1.667 km grid size: 300x200, , 418x427, 373x382
DESCRIPTION
Concurrent Visualization (NASA Goddard and Ames). WRF simulated dBz- 2 min. Shape/size of the eye. NASA Ames Visualization Group. Katrina 2005. Goddard Mesoscale Dynamic and Modeling Group. Resolutions: 15, 5 and 1.667 km Grid size: 300x200, , 418x427, 373x382 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Resolutions: 15, 5 and 1.667 km Grid size: 300x200, , 418x427, 373x382Dt = 60, 20, 6.67 seconds Starting time: 00Z 8/27/2005
Initial and Boundary Conditions: NCEP/GFS, with bogus but no data assimilation
WRF simulated
dBz-2 min
NASA AmesVisualization Group
Katrina 2005
Shape/size of the eye
Concurrent Visualization (NASA Goddard and Ames)
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Goddard Mesoscale Dynamic and
Modeling Group Website for mesoscale modeling group and cloud library http://portal.nccs.nasa.gov/cloudlibrary/index2.html
Tracks for Hurricane Katrina (2005) from the observation and five different WRF experiments using different microphysical schemes (from 00Z 8/27/2005 to 00Z 8/30/2005).
Good track forecast in 1st 24 h model integration (less than 25 km because imposed bogus)
All schemes’ simulated track is far west after landfall
Minimum sea level pressure (MSLP) from the observation and five different WRF experiments using different microphysical schemesSimilar temporal variation between model simulated and observed MSLP.
All 3ICE schemes over-estimated MSLP (~20-25 hPa), especially Lin scheme (45 hPa lower).
No ice case produced strongest hurricane (in the 1st 30 hours).
Hurricane Katrina (2005)Minimum sea level pressure (MSLP)
Tracks for Hurricane Katrina
Lin
Ice Free
Tao, W.-K., J. Shi, S. Chen, S. Lang, S.-Y. Hong, G. Thompson, C. Peters-Lidard, T. Matsui, A. Hou, S. Braun, and J. Simpson, 2009: Studying precipitation processes in WRF with Goddard bulk microphysics: Comparison with different microphysical schemes,, Mon. Wea. Rev., (in revision).