research methodology
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
CELEBRITY BRAND ENDORSEMENT INFLUENCES CONSUMER
PREFERENCE
contents
• Introduction• Celebrity brand endorsement• Objectives• Methodology• Questionnaire• Findings• Analysis• Celebrity interview• Conclusion
Introduction
• use of celebrity for advertising in companies has become a trend .
• 'celebrity endorsement' has attracted immense debate.
• Indian advertisement has been placing a vital amount of importance
• can create a positive and favourable image of the company and helps in building brand image
The celeb power
Who is a celebrity• A person who does not require any
introduction, whose recognition is widespread and gets regular attention of media as well as people and always remain in headlines.
Need for celeb endorsement• Act as best spokesperson for the products and
making it a brand
OBJECTIVES OFTHE RESEARCH
• To understand the impact of celebrity brand endorsement on buyers purchasing decision
• To understand the various celebrity types and means of advertisement affecting consumers.
• To understand the various age groups and their relation with brand endorsement
RESEARCH METHODOOGY
• Sample design• A primary research was conducted by
communicating with 100 respondents through a self designed questionnaire
• Sample Size- A sample size of 100 respondents, both male and female in the age group between 18-60 years belonging to different occupations was taken from different parts of Mumbai city.
• QUESTIONNAIRE
FINDINGSGENDER
Do the celebs actually use the product they endorse?
Hypothesis
• H₀ = Both the variables i.e. Age and buying a product due to a celebrity using are independent of each other.
Chi-square test
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.095a 12 .851
Likelihood Ratio 7.957 12 .788
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56.
INTERPRETATION
At 5% level of significanceAlpha value = 0.05P value = 0.851P value > Alpha valueHence, we accept the null hypothesis and
conclude that Age and buying a product due to a celebrity using are independent of each other.
Chi-square test
• H₀ = Both the variables i.e. Gender and products endorsed by celebrities are of good quality are independent to each other.
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.271a 8 .832
Likelihood Ratio 4.453 8 .814
N of Valid Cases 100
INTERPRETATION
At 5% level of significanceAlpha value = 0.05P value = 0.832P value > Alpha valueHence, we accept the null hypothesis and
conclude that Gender and products endorsed by celebrities are independent of each other.
Chi-square test
• H₀ = Both the variables i.e. Age group & brand recognition are independent to each other.
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 52.727a 12 .000
Likelihood Ratio 66.029 12 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association .452 1 .501
N of Valid Cases 100
INTERPRETATION
At 5% level of significanceAlpha value = 0.05P value = 0.000P value < Alpha valueHence, we reject the null hypothesis and
conclude that purchase intent depends on variable age
PAIRED T TEST
• Ho- there is no significant difference in the mean ratings towards the perception of the brand before and after the celebrity endorsing a product has been involved in a scandal
PAIRED T TEST
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
Pair 1
Q2 - Q3
-.08000 2.03842 .20384 -.48447 .32447 -.392 99 .696
INTERPRETATION
At 5% level of significanceAlpha value = 0.05P value = 0.696P value > Alpha valueHence, we accept the null hypothesis that there is
no significant difference in the mean ratings towards the perception of the brand before and after the celebrity endorsing a product has been involved in a scandal
FACTORIAL DESIGN WITH TWO OR MORE FACTORS
• H₀ = Different types of celebrity endorsement does not create a significant difference in brand recognition.
• H₁ = Different means of advertisement does not create a significant difference in brand recognition.
• H₂ = Combination of different types of celebrity endorsement and advertisement does not create any significant difference in brand recognition.
FACTORIAL DESIGN OUTPUT
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Q8
1.00 filmstar 55
2.00 politician 10
3.00 cricketer 15
4.00 famous personality 20
Q10
1.00 television 20
2.00 radio 25
3.00 magazine 15
4.00 newspaper 30
5.00 internet 10
FACTORIAL DESIGN OUTPUTTests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: Q1
Source Type III Sum of Squares
df Mean Square F Sig.
InterceptHypothesis 231.746 1 231.746 58.485 .005
Error 11.802 2.978 3.963a
Q8Hypothesis 38.911 3 12.970 2.652 .157
Error 25.161 5.145 4.890b
Q10Hypothesis 20.334 4 5.084 .807 .573
Error 29.435 4.675 6.297c
Q8 * Q10Hypothesis 26.168 5 5.234 5.939 .000
Error 76.667 87 .881d
INTERPRETATION
At 5% level of significanceAlpha value = 0.05P value = 0.157P value > Alpha valueHence, we accept the null hypothesis that Different types of celebrity endorsement does not create a significant difference in brand recognition
INTERPRETATION
At 5% level of significanceAlpha value = 0.05P value = 0.573P value > Alpha valueHence, we accept the null hypothesis that different means of advertisement does not create a significant difference in brand recognition.
INTERPRETATION
At 5% level of significanceAlpha value = 0.05P value = 0.000P value < Alpha valueHence, we reject the null hypothesis that
combination of different types of celebrity endorsement and advertisement does not create any significant difference in brand recognition.
CONCLUSION
• From the above analysis we conclude that celebrity brand endorsements does not have an impact on consumer preference
• It is irrespective of what the medium of ad is and the type of celebrity