report to board of education april 12, 2010 trenton public schools
TRANSCRIPT
Report to Board of EducationApril 12, 2010
Trenton Public Schools
Michigan EducationalAssessment Program
Fall 2009 Results
MEAP Administered in October Mathematics and Reading assessed in grades 3-8 Writing not assessed in 2009 – operational in 2010
for grades 4 and 7 Science assessed in grades 5 and 8 Social Studies assessed in grades 6 and 9 Expectations from previous grade level or grade
span Criterion referenced test Four Performance Levels
Level 1 – Advanced (Exceeded) Level 2 – Proficient (Met) Level 3 – Partially Proficient (Basic) Level 4 – Not Proficient (Apprentice)
5 years of comparison scores (2005 base year)
Reading
Michigan Annual AYP Targets
ReadingYear 3 4 5 6 7 8
2005-06
50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41%
2006-07
50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41%
2007-09
60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53%
2008-09
60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53%
2009-10
70% 69% 68% 67% 66% 65%
2010-11
78% 77% 76% 75% 74% 73%
2011-12
86% 85% 84% 83% 82% 82%
2012-13
93% 92% 92% 91% 91% 91%
2013-14
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
ReadingDistrict & State Comparison
Fall 2009
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 0
20
40
60
80
100 9286 90 86 89
8490
84 85 8882 83
70 69 68 67 66 65
Trenton State AYP Target
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Reading Trend Data
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 0
20
40
60
80
100 9387 89 89 88
77
91 9388 87 86 85
9186 89
83 8578
89 91
8084
80 79
9286
9086 89
84
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Trenton Students
Reading Trend DataTrenton and State Comparison
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
ReadingGrade 5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
ReadingGrade 3
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
ReadingGrade 4
Reading Trend DataTrenton and State Comparison
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
ReadingGrade 8
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
ReadingGrade 6
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
ReadingGrade 7
Students With Disabilities
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th0
10203040506070
30 26
45 4552
3530
43
26
57
4049
3541
61
35
6051
4353 50 50
39 41
2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
enta
ge P
oint
Gap
Reading Gap in Proficiency
Comparison by Subgroup
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 0
20
40
60
80
100 9286 90 86 89
84
9994 97 94 95 91
58
41
5344
5650
All Non-SWD SWD
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Comparison by SWD SubgroupReading Fall 2009
Students With Disabilities
Students
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
SWD 77 92 91 95 97Non-SWD
568 547 540 546 531
94 96 93 93 96
56 60 60
4651
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
enta
ge P
rofic
ient
Non-SWDSWD
Reading MEAP
Proficiency by SWD and Non-SWD
Grades 3-5
Students With Disabilities
Students
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
SWD 101 98 115 101 110Non-SWD
641 586 565 555 559
91 93 90 8993
4047
41 40
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
enta
ge P
rofic
ient
Non-SWDSWD
Reading MEAP
Proficiency by SWD and Non-SWD
Grades 6-8
Wayne County RankingsMEAP Reading
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
2009 15th
92.414th
86.110th
90.116th
86.24th
91.511th
83.6
2008 14th
88.86th
90.614th
79.610th
84.314th
80.19th
78.8
2007 7th
91.013th
86.07th
88.510th
83.45th
85.09th
78.0
2006 9th
91.44th
92.89th
87.78th
87.47th
85.67th
94.5
2005 7th
93.011th
86.57th
88.66th
89.23rd88.3
8th
76.9
Observations on Reading► In 2009, the number of Trenton students proficient in Reading is
slightly higher (1 to 7 percentage points) as compared to the State in all grades except grade 6 (2 percentage points lower)
► Significantly exceed AYP Reading Target in all grades (17 to 23 percentage points)
► Since 2005 baseline, Trenton’s Reading trend data has remained relatively flat in all grades except grade 8 (7 percentage point increase)
► The difference has narrowed in the number of students proficient in Reading when comparing Trenton’s trend data with the State’s trend data
► The percentage of Students Without Disabilities proficient in Reading continues to be significantly higher than Students With Disabilities
► Trenton’s ranking in Wayne County has fluctuated year to year and grade to grade
Initiatives for Improvement► Curriculum Review and Development Cycle for K-12 Language Arts
Review assessment data and current curriculum Study best practices in reading and writing instruction Develop Power Standards Visit exemplary districts Review and recommend LA adoption Teacher Curriculum Guides and Common Assessments
► Professional Development Special Education Literacy Connections Training Literacy Leaders Writing in the Content Areas
► Pilot of Study Island at Taylor Elementary and Arthurs Middle School
► Reading Assessment for Grades 3-12
► Reading Intervention
► Summer Reading Program for Grades 1 and 2
Mathematics
Michigan Annual AYP Targets
MathematicsYear 3 4 5 6 7 8
2005-06
59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43%
2006-07
59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43%
2007-09
67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54%
2008-09
67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54%
2009-10
67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54%
2010-11
75% 74% 71% 70% 67% 66%
2011-12
83% 82% 81% 80% 78% 77%
2012-13
91% 91% 90% 90% 89% 89%
2013-14
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
MathematicsDistrict & State Comparison
Fall 2009
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 0
20
40
60
80
100 96 9388
79
92
78
95 92
79 82 82
7067 65 62 60 57 54
Trenton State AYP Target
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Mathematics Trend Data
Trenton Students
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th0
20
40
60
80
10092
8781
75
64 64
95 92
77 7672
77
96
88
79
68
85 82
93 92
8186
90
73
96 9388
79
92
78
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Mathematics Trend DataTrenton and State Comparison
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
MathGrade 5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
020406080
100120
Trenton State
MathGrade 3
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
MathGrade 4
Mathematics Trend DataTrenton and State Comparison
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
MathGrade 8
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
MathGrade 6
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
MathGrade 7
Students With Disabilities
Mathematics Gap in Proficiency
13 10
28
5459
38
9
42 4439
46 49
24
47 48 45
25
48
15
31 35
55
36 32
010203040506070
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
Perc
enta
ge P
oint
Gap
2006 2007 2008 2009
Comparison by SubgroupComparison by SWD Subgroup
Math Fall 2009
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 0
20
40
60
80
100 96 9388
79
92
78
99 98 9488
97
8484
6759
33
6152
All Non-SWD SWD
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Students With Disabilities
Students
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
SWD 77 93 91 96 98Non-SWD
568 547 534 547 530
89 91 93 95 97
71 71
3645
67
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
enta
ge P
rofic
ient
Non-SWD
SWD
Math MEAPProficiency by
SWD and Non-SWDGrades 3-5
Students With Disabilities
Students
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
SWD 101 98 115 101 110Non-SWD
641 586 565 555 559
79 8287 89 90
19
3541
52 49
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
enta
ge P
rofic
ient
Non-SWD
SWD
Math MEAPProficiency by
SWD and Non-SWDGrades 6-8
Wayne County RankingsMEAP Mathematics
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
2009 11th
96.515th
92.86th
88.316th
79.35th
91.56th
77.9
2008 18th
92.78th
92.513th
80.86th
85.98th
89.617th
72.7
2007 6th
96.015th
88.37th
79.220th
68.15th
85.05th
81.8
2006 7th
94.56th
92.317th 77.0
9th
76.18th
72.17th
77.3
2005 10th
91.68th
89.68th
89.68th
89.68th
89.68th
89.6
Observations on Mathematics► In 2009, the number of Trenton students proficient in Mathematics is
slightly higher (1 to 10 percentage points) as compared to the State in all grades except grade 6 (3 percentage points lower)
► Significantly exceed AYP Mathematics Target in all grades (19 to 35 percentage points)
► Since 2005 baseline, Trenton’s trend data has trended upward particularly in grades 7 and 8
► Trenton ‘s percentage proficient has improved at a steadier rate in grades 5, 7, and 8 as compared to the State. The difference in the percentage proficient has narrowed in grades 3, 4, and 6.
► The percentage of Students Without Disabilities proficient in Mathematics continues to be significantly higher than Students With Disabilities, although the gap has decreased in grades 6-8
► Trenton’s ranking in Wayne County has fluctuated year to year and grade to grade
Initiatives for Improvement► Teacher Curriculum Guides and Common Unit Assessments
► Summative Common Assessments per Grade Level
► CLASS A for Test Delivery and Performance Analysis
► Training in Data Driven Dialogue
► Grade Level SMART Goals based on Common Assessments
► Math Interventions
► Pilot of Study Island at Taylor Elementary and Arthurs Middle School
► Summer Math Program for Grades 1-8
► Co-Teaching Opportunities at Elementary Level
Science &Social Studies
ScienceDistrict & State Comparison
Fall 2009
5th 8th 0
20
40
60
80
10087 8681 76
Trenton State
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Science Trend Data
Trenton Students
5th 8th 0
20
40
60
80
10091
83
91
81
908586
8087 86
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Science Trend DataTrenton and State Comparison
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
ScienceGrade 5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
ScienceGrade 8
Comparison by SubgroupComparison by SWD Subgroup
Science Fall 2009
5th 8th 0
20
40
60
80
10087 86
94 91
5362
All Non-SWD SWD
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Social StudiesDistrict & State Comparison
Fall 2009
6th 9th0
20
40
60
80
100
81 7973 71
Trenton State
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Social Studies Trend Data
Trenton Students
6th 9th 0
20
40
60
80
10090
77
8780
768282 85
81 79
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Social Studies Trend DataTrenton and State Comparison
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
Social StudiesGrade 6
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
Trenton State
Social StudiesGrade 9
Comparison by SubgroupComparison by SWD Subgroup
Social Studies Fall 2009
6th 9th0
20
40
60
80
100
81 7988 87
4233
All Non-SWD SWD
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Wayne County Rankings
ScienceYear 5th 8th
2009 7th
87.45th
86.3
2008 11th
86.311th
79.3
2007 6th
90.58th
84.7
2006 7th
90.68th
81.1
2005 2th
91.48th
82.6
Social StudiesYear 6th 9th
2009 8th 80.6
7th 79.3
2008 9th
81.96th
82.1
2007 12th
76.26th
82.1
2006 4th
87.37th
79.6
2005 5th
89.79th
77.2
Observations on Science► In 2009, the number of Trenton students proficient in Science is
higher (6 to 10 percentage points) as compared to the State in both 5th and 8th grade
► Since 2005 baseline, Trenton’s trend data has trended slightly downward in 5th grade and slightly upward in 8th grade
► The difference in percentage proficient for Trenton as compared to the State has narrowed in 5th grade while staying fairly consistent in 8th grade
► The percentage of Students Without Disabilities proficient in Science continues to be significantly higher than Students With Disabilities
► Except for 2008, Trenton’s ranking in Wayne County has remained in the top eight for both 5th and 8th grade
Observations on Social Studies► In 2009, the number of Trenton students proficient in Social Studies
is higher (7 to 8 percentage points) as compared to the State in both 5th and 8th grade
► Since 2005 baseline, Trenton’s trend data has trended moderately downward in 6th grade and slightly upward in 9th grade
► Overall, the difference in percentage proficient for Trenton as compared to the State has remained fairly consistent in both 6th and 9th grade,
► The percentage of Students Without Disabilities proficient in Science continues to be significantly higher than Students With Disabilities
► Except for 6th grade in 2006, Trenton’s ranking in Wayne County has remained in the top nine for both 6th and 9th grade
Initiatives for Improvement► Alignment to new Content Expectations
► New K-5 Science Program and Training
► Updated Middle School Texts
► Common Assessments in Science
► CLASS A for Test Delivery and Performance Analysis (Middle school Science)
► Teacher Curriculum Guides for Science
► Power Standards for Social Studies
► Strategies for Reading and Writing Informational Text
