report supporting the changing research practices of ... · ithaka s+r’s research support...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
REPORT
Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Religious Studies ScholarsFebruary 8, 2017
Danielle CooperRoger Schonfeld
Richard Adams
Matthew Baker
Nisa Bakkalbasi
John G. Bales
Rebekah Bedard
Chris Benda
Beth Bidlack
Sarah Bogue
Trisha Burr
Gillian Harrison Cain
Ina Cohen
Wesley Custer
Virginia Dearborn
Gerrit van Dyk
Suzanne Estelle-Holmer
Kathryn Flynn
Jenifer Gundry
Trevan Hatch
Justin Hill
Bill Hook
Thad Horner
Hye-jin Juhn
Andrew Keck
Michael Kohut
Gloria Korsman
Graziano Krätli
Ryan Lee
Rebecca Lloyd
Reed Lowrie
Margot Lyon
Jean McManus
John Meeks
Christine Pesch Richardson
John Robinson
Kay Roethemeyer
Robert Roethemeyer
Ramona Romero
Fred Rowland
Veronica Simms
Kate Skrebutenas
Jacqueline Solis
Steven Squires
Maria Stanton
Naomi Steinberger
Chris Strauber
Elka Tenner
Amanda Thomas
Paul Allen Tippey
Nancy Turner
Nicholas Weiss
![Page 2: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 1
Ithaka S+R is a strategic consulting
and research service provided by
ITHAKA, a not-for-profit
organization dedicated to helping the
academic community use digital
technologies to preserve the scholarly
record and to advance research and
teaching in sustainable ways. Ithaka
S+R focuses on the transformation of
scholarship and teaching in an online
environment, with the goal of
identifying the critical issues facing
our community and acting as a
catalyst for change. JSTOR, a
research and learning platform, and
Portico, a digital preservation
service, are also part of ITHAKA.
Copyright 2017 ITHAKA. This work is
licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
International License. To view a copy of
the license, please see http://creative-
commons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
ITHAKA is interested in disseminating
this brief as widely as possible. Please
contact us with any questions about using
the report: [email protected].
![Page 3: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 2
We dedicate this report to the memory of Donald Vorp, who was a great
supporter of the Research Support Services project on Religious Studies and a
champion of theological librarianship.
We thank the American Theological Library Association (ATLA) for its
sponsorship of the Research Support Services project on Religious Studies. We
are also grateful for the support of the American Academy of Religion (AAR)
and Society of Biblical Literature (SBL).
![Page 4: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 3
Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 4
Introduction ..........................................................................................................5
Methods ................................................................................................................. 7
Discovering and Accessing Information ............................................................. 14
Information Management .................................................................................. 25
Audience, Output and Credit ............................................................................. 30
Digital Humanities ............................................................................................. 36
Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 37
Recommendations .............................................................................................. 41
Appendices ......................................................................................................... 43
![Page 5: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 4
Executive Summary
Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate
the research support needs of scholars by their discipline. In 2016 Ithaka S+R examined
the changing research methods and practices of academic religious studies scholars in
the United States, with the goal of identifying services to better support them. The
project was undertaken collaboratively with research teams at 18 academic libraries and
the American Theological Library Association with guidance from an advisory
committee.
The goal of this report is to provide actionable findings for the organizations, institutions
and professionals who support the research process of religious studies. One hundred
and ninety eight scholars were interviewed during the project and Ithaka S+R sampled
102 of the resulting transcripts towards the analysis for this report. Ithaka S+R identified
three major thematic areas in which religious studies would benefit from improved or
new services:
Discovering and accessing information. When available, digital discovery and access have
greatly improved these scholars’ research experiences with relatively few challenges. Scholars
located in some seminaries and those conducting research on religions and religious cultures
beyond the West experience greater challenges when conducting primary and secondary
source research.
Information management. Scholars contend with the challenge of managing vast arrays of
information that they produce and collect in the process of conducting their research and
engage in idiosyncratic practices for organizing and storing their information. They struggle
with digital approaches to citation management and information storage and experience
uncertainty around destroying and preserving information following their personal use.
Audience, output and credit. Scholars’ primary focus remains on traditional scholarly outputs
due to the expectations associated with tenure and promotion. Overall awareness and
engagement with open access is low but the perceived importance of more freely sharing work
as enabled by social media platforms is high.
The report concludes by highlighting key issues and providing recommendations from
across the findings that have wider implications for how religious studies research
support is conceptualized and prioritized. Religious studies scholars’ ongoing lack of
awareness of and engagement with digital research methods, including those associated
with the digital humanities, reflects major structural barriers to methodological
innovation within the discipline necessitating intervention at various levels. While
religious studies scholars continue to rely on their institutional libraries, particularly for
access to secondary materials, their use of the library is placed among many other
strategies for finding and accessing information. Supporting religious studies scholars in
![Page 6: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 5
their capacities as collectors is one entryway for re-thinking how research support can be
cohesively defined and delineated.
Introduction
The contexts and practices of research in higher education are in great flux. Scholars are
not only confronting new technologies that redefine every aspect of their research
activity – from discovering to organizing to disseminating information – but they also
must contend with the economic restructuring of the academy. As research activity
evolves, so too must the services and spaces that are provided to foster those activities.
In order to better understand the changing research methods and practices, Ithaka S+R’s
Research Support Services (RSS) program conducts in-depth qualitative analysis of the
research practices and associated support needs of scholars by discipline. Previous
projects in the program explored scholars in history, chemistry and art history.1 Each
project in the program fosters a scholar-centered approach to understanding research in
higher education that will lead to new insights towards developing information services
and spaces. The programmatic nature of this work also enables comparison of scholarly
activity across the disciplines, which leads to deeper understanding of what makes
research activity unique throughout the academy.
The discipline includes a complex interplay of types of
scholarship amidst a shifting backdrop of ongoing debates
about the role and function of religion in higher education
and the evolution of perception and practice of religion in
society at large.
Religious studies provided a compelling entry point for continuing this work. The
discipline includes a complex interplay of types of scholarship amidst a shifting backdrop
1 Jennifer Rutner and Roger C. Schonfeld, “Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Historians,” Ithaka S+R,
December 10, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.22532; Matthew P. Long and Roger C. Schonfeld,” “Supporting the
Changing Research Practices of Chemists,” Ithaka S+R, February 26, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.22561; Matthew
P. Long and Roger C. Schonfeld,” “Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Art Historians,” Ithaka S+R, April 30,
2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.22833.
![Page 7: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 6
of ongoing debates about the role and function of religion in higher education and the
evolution of perception and practice of religion in society at large. Traditionally
humanistic in orientation, social science methods are increasingly popular within the
discipline, and there is also a move towards incorporating new approaches to
interdisciplinary research. Across this methodological spectrum the discipline is
contending with representational tensions, both in terms of the religions and geographic
areas studied and who is conducting the research. Religious studies scholars may also
approach their work from different positionalities: some take a “confessional” approach
to their work (meaning, their work is in service to or support of a particular faith
tradition) and/or they are oriented towards the professional dimension of religion (e.g.
educating future pastors), while others articulate their work as having strictly secular
and non-applied academic aims. Some standalone seminaries are facing major funding
challenges, mergers and closures, while religious studies scholars also generally feel the
threat of decline in funding and lack of tenure-track jobs.
An underlying concern of this project is how technological affordances are shaping
research practices within the discipline. The majority of religious studies scholars
reported that they experience benefits associated with increased discovery and access to
information for both primary and secondary sources. However, their approach to seeking
and analyzing this information remains largely under systematized and some struggle
with even basic awareness of and skills using these tools. Despite the promise of new
technology-enabled research methodologies and dissemination, such as those associated
with digital humanities, the majority of scholars reported engaging in traditional
research and publishing activities, in part due to an academic system that continues to
privilege peer-reviewed book and journal publications.2 We learned that access to digital
information is a challenge for scholars studying religion beyond the West and scholars
located in institutions with funding constraints, such as standalone seminaries and
historically black colleges and universities.3
Our report provides an overview of religious studies scholars’ research activities across
the life-cycle of their research from information discovery and access, to organization,
preservation, and dissemination, and their perceptions of how the discipline is evolving
2 The orientation of the majority of religious studies scholars to emerging technology-enabled research methodologies and
dissemination is fairly consistent with the orientation of scholars in the humanities and social sciences more widely. For
example, Ithaka S+R’s US Faculty Survey 2015 found no overall growth in digital humanities research activity, see
Christine Wolff, Alisa B. Rod and Roger C. Schonfeld, “Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2015,” Ithaka S+R, April 4, 2016,
http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/SR_Report_US_Faculty_Survey_201504416.pdf, 75.
3 Challenges of accessing information due to funding constraints may also be experienced by scholars at types of
institutions not represented in our sample, most notably, smaller liberal arts colleges, which warrants further research
attending specifically to those institutional contexts.
![Page 8: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 7
and the implications of those changes for how research is conducted. Throughout we
attend to how the diversity in the types of religious studies scholars leads to
convergences and divergences in their research practices. We hope that the findings and
recommendations will suggest opportunities for the broader community that supports
religious studies research.
Methods
This report is one component of a collaborative research project undertaken with 18
institutions in consultation with an advisory committee. A central component to
developing the project was defining “religious studies scholar” and delimiting
meaningful categories within the larger field for further analysis. Attending to
representation, both in terms of participating institutions and, by extension, the scholars
included in the research, were also of key concern.
Developing the Religious Studies Project
Ithaka S+R convened an advisory committee and solicited input from several other
religious studies librarians and scholars who are leaders in their fields to guide the
project. We thank the advisory committee for their thoughtful participation in the
project: Brenda Bailey-Hainer (American Theological Library Association), Jack Fitzmier
(American Academy of Religion), John Kutsko (Society of Biblical Literature), and
Sabahat Adil (University of Colorado Boulder). Patrick Graham (Pitts Theology Library,
Emory University), Beth Bidlack (Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary), and
Jacob Wright (Emory University) also provided helpful insight.
This project represents the first time Ithaka S+R has worked collaboratively with other
institutions to conduct in-depth research on a scholarly discipline.4 Eighteen academic
libraries partnered with Ithaka S+R and created research teams of one to four members
who, following a training workshop designed and led by Danielle Cooper, collected the
qualitative data that Ithaka S+R analyzed for this report. Participation in the project was
open to any U.S. higher education institution with religious studies offerings and able to
conform to the project specifications (e.g. timeline, research capacity). We included all
institutions that met this criteria and we thank all the institutions who were able to
participate in the project. Appendix 1 lists the participants on the institutional research
teams. Appendix 2 and 3 detail the demographic characteristics of the research teams’
4 Research for our previous reports on the research support needs of scholars in art history, chemistry and history was
conducted exclusively by Ithaka S+R staff.
![Page 9: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 8
institutions, and Appendix 4 provides further information about those institutions’ scopes and missions.
Once the initial expressions of interest were gathered, the American Theological Library
Association did further outreach to specific institutions to ensure broader inclusion
across the spectrum of religious studies in U.S. higher education. Of particular concern
was enabling participation of standalone seminaries and institutions with scholars that
study religions beyond Christianity. A portion of the sponsorship provided by the
American Theological Library Association enabled the inclusion of institutions that
would otherwise have been unable to participate due to financial barriers and thus
diversified participation. The American Theological Library Association also participated
by conducting interviews with two groups that remained underrepresented within the
cohort of participating institutions and were identified as priorities for inclusion:
scholars of Islam and scholars from historically black colleges and universities. This
resulted in interviews with scholars at the following institutions: Howard University,
Interdenominational Theological Center, Spelman College, Clark Atlanta University,
University of Colorado Boulder, and University of Oklahoma. Appendix 3 details the
demographic characteristics of the institutions included through the interviews
conducted by the American Theological Library Association.
The research teams at the participating institutions primarily comprised subject
librarians but also included participants in other roles such as acquisitions and
collections librarians, digital and web services librarians, and graduate students. Each
team conducted research with a target of 15 religious studies scholars at their institution
through semi-structured interviews that followed the arc of the research process (see
Appendix 6 for the interview guide). Research teams also had the option of using
photography to document noteworthy information, collections, and spaces. Each team
also developed their own analysis from the data they collected at their respective
institutions with the option of either creating an internal whitepaper or a publicly
available report. The publicly available local reports, which provide a compliment to this
capstone report, are listed and linked in Appendix 5.
Ithaka S+R collected anonymized transcripts from each participating institution and
interviews from the American Theological Library Association for a total sample of 102
interviews towards the analysis for this report. The transcripts were selected purposively
to ensure maximum variation in interviewee demographics as per their institutional
affiliations, methodological approaches, and topics of study (with emphasis on ensuring
that research beyond Western mainline Christianity was meaningfully included). The
transcripts were analyzed through a grounded approach to coding utilizing NVivo
![Page 10: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 9
software. The interviewees remain unidentified in this report to protect anonymity and
we thank them for their participation.
Defining and Delimiting the Religious Studies Scholar
The project focuses on the practices and needs of religious studies scholars exclusively in
the context of higher education. Reflecting the project’s aim to focus on research as
opposed to teaching activities, we defined “scholars” as individuals who are employed by
their institutions with research as a significant component of their capacity, as opposed
to primarily teaching. Graduate students were also not included in this study.5
The definition of religious studies used for this project reflects the breadth and diversity
of the discipline. Scholars who study religion examine a variety of time periods, world
regions, and religious traditions. They use methods such as linguistics, anthropology,
history, philosophy, textual criticism, sociology, and political science. They may be found
in academia in arts and sciences departments such as religious studies, philosophy,
anthropology, history, and sociology as well as in centers for training and practice such
as divinity schools and seminaries. Some scholars contribute to the professional training
of religious leaders, while others study these topics from a purely secular perspective. In
this project, we did not focus on any particular religion.
The boundaries of what constitutes religious studies is at times contested, in particular,
the relationship between theology and religious studies.6 While the focus of the project
was not to track religious studies scholars’ perspectives on the relationship between
religious studies and theology, we did attend to this issue to determine whether these
divisions were relevant to research support activities or needs or perceptions of the
discipline more widely. Overall, scholars in this project either identified as being firmly
part of religious studies and/or they did not object to their work being included under
the larger umbrella of religious studies. Some highlighted that there was a false
dichotomy between the two terms, that they were unaware of the difference, or that they
preferred to avoid the debate. Others aligned with Islamic studies and Jewish studies
highlighted that they identified more with those areas than “religious studies” or
“theology” due to the historic Christian-centrism of those fields. In lieu of the term
5 While research is also a major activity for graduate students, we left graduate students out of scope because the context
in which they conduct their research and their relationship to their institutions is different enough to warrant their
exclusion.
6 See for example: Tara Isabella Burton, “The End of Theology?” Chronicle of Higher Education, January 24, 2016,
https://shar.es/1IvdZI, and, Linell E. Cady and Delwin Brown, Religious Studies, Theology, and the University: Conflicting
Maps, Changing Terrain (Albany: SUNY Press, 2002).
![Page 11: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 10
theology, some scholars also highlighted the difference between “confessional” or “non-
confessional” research (whether or not one conducts scholarship from the perspective of
or in service of a particular faith tradition or church).
Categorizing the Religious Studies Scholar
Ithaka S+R carefully attended to scholars’ methodological orientations to ensure that
scholars with a variety of approaches to the field were included in the analysis and that
those differences were considered, when relevant, to identifying research support needs
and services. Religious studies is traditionally an interdisciplinary humanistic pursuit. 7
While there are anecdotal perceptions that social science approaches are increasingly
popular within the field, these approaches primarily fall within the bounds of the
“humanistic social sciences.” As such, many religious studies scholars share similarities
in their research approaches and these approaches often overlap with the activities and
concerns of scholars in other humanistic disciplines. However, some areas of study
aligned with religious studies, most notably theology and biblical studies, have
sufficiently meaningful histories and contemporary scholarly cultures to warrant further
attention within the report. Furthermore, social science researchers in religious studies
rely on qualitative research methods that distinguish some of their research support
needs from their peers located in the humanities proper. Finally, scholars whose work
explores the arts of ministry towards benefitting professional training fall within the
methodological bounds of applied research that warrants analysis separate from the
other categories.
Based on these considerations Ithaka S+R created the following categories to distinguish
between scholars when determining which interviews to include in the sample:
humanities, biblical studies, theology, social science, and arts of ministry. When
relevant, differences between categories that emerged during the analysis process are
noted in the report. The categories are not considered mutually exclusive and do not
represent a hierarchy of research approaches within religious studies. How various
scholars define themselves and others as falling within or outside the bounds of religious
studies is beyond the scope of this project. What follows below are detailed descriptions
of the categories, and, demographic information about scholars placed within these
categories and how they relate to the sample as a whole.
7 The definition of what constitutes religious studies as a humanistic pursuit varies. For example, the American Academy
of Arts and Science includes “religion” within the scope of “humanities” for the purposes of its Humanities Indicators as
“programs in the comparative, nonsectarian study of religion; studies of particular religions; history of religion; does not
include programs in theology or ministry” but also acknowledges that some institutions “count all theology and ministry
courses as humanities instruction.”
![Page 12: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 11
Humanities
In this study “humanities” refers to scholars who utilize humanities research methods
such as art history, history, and philosophy, among many others. Biblical studies and
theology scholars also fit within the purview of the humanities but were selected in
addition to this category in order to examine and attend to the unique context of those
fields in relation to religious studies. This category represented the largest proportion of
scholars collected across the participating institutions. Ithaka S+R selected thirty five
scholars that conformed to this category for further analysis.
The majority of humanities scholars in this study had affiliations (and cross-affiliations)
in non-professional departments such as religion, classics, or history (among others). As
per the recommendations of the advisory committee, Ithaka S+R selected all of the
scholars who were cross-listed between their university’s religious studies departments
and their university’s seminary, divinity or theology school or department, and the four
of whom this designation applied are humanists.
Religious studies scholars in the humanities draw from a variety of disciplines to do their
work including American studies, history, literature, linguistics, art history, and classics.
The majority of scholars in the sample identified either as historians or noted that their
work involved history-inflected methodologies, including intellectual history, social
history, and oral history. The majority of these religious studies scholars primarily
received their training in other disciplines (as opposed to religious studies) and closely
identify with those fields. They attend conferences in these other disciplines and many
reported that they became involved in religious studies only after their appointment in a
religious studies department. Some continued to see their work as primarily falling in
another discipline, while seeing only the content of their work as aligned with religious
studies. No scholars in this cohort conceptualized their work in terms of theology as
opposed to religious studies, but one interviewee in a divinity school did report that their
work fit into that program because of interest in larger issues of “practical” ethics.
These scholars’ theoretical approaches were mixed. Some noted that history in particular
does not require theoretical frameworks like other humanities disciplines. Typical
responses to theoretical approaches in this group included: “that’s always a tough
question for a historian”; “historians are very nervous about hewing to a particular line
or ideology, although there are Marxist historians and liberal historians and so forth and
so on”; and “[my work] does not overtly employ theoretical structures. I’m one of those
historians.” Yet, others did note that their research is informed by theoretical
frameworks, such as feminist, post-colonial, and postmodern.
![Page 13: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 12
Biblical Studies
Biblical studies, which is the academic study of the Bible from various disciplinary
perspectives, represents an important field of humanistic inquiry within religious studies
warranting particular attention for this report. Twenty biblical studies scholars were
selected in addition to scholars counted in the humanities category above.
Biblical studies scholars draw on artifacts and texts that illuminate the context and
meaning of the Bible relying on methodologies that are generally historical (e.g.
intellectual history, historical-critical, reception history, discourse analysis), literary (e.g.
narrative criticism, textual analysis, or linguistic (e.g. philology, sociolinguistics) in
nature, often in combination. These scholars often report engaging with adjacent
disciplines such as archaeology, classics, and near and Middle Eastern studies. In the last
several decades the field has dramatically expanded to include contextual interpretations
and the social impact of biblical traditions, and these scholars engage heavily in cultural
studies. Scholars may approach biblical studies from either a secular or confessional
approach and can be found in religious studies departments as well as seminaries,
theology and divinity departments or schools. Regardless of how they read their texts, as
determined by their disciplinary and theoretical alignments, biblical studies scholars
generally display a shared practice of closely reading texts. Their research practices also
display commonalities because the discipline is united by a canon of primary source
texts, although they often specialize within that canon, or specialize on contemporaneous
ancient texts outside the biblical canon
Theology
“Theology” refers to the critical study of the nature of the divine, which may or may not
be a confessional practice deliberately tied to a particular church or faith tradition.8
Fourteen scholars aligned with theology were selected for this report in addition to the
scholars selected in the humanities category in recognition of the field’s unique history
and complex relationship to religious studies. Reflecting the term’s origin within
Western thought traditions, applying the term to studying belief systems beyond
Judaism and Christianity is contested. Within the sample for this study the majority of
the fourteen theology scholars were focused primarily on Judeo and/or Christian texts,
with one scholar focused on Buddhism.
Scholars aligned with theology engage with other disciplines, but the nature of
engagement varies by whether they are more oriented towards historical methods or
8 This project categorizes “practical theology” alongside other applied scholarship within the “arts of ministry” category.
![Page 14: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 13
textual, systematic, and/or thematic analysis. Those who are oriented to studying
theology thematically characterized the work in such ways as “read[ing] my way into a
topic,” “putting texts into conversation,” and working to see “where other discourses put
pressure on theology.” Scholars oriented more with history tend to concurrently engage
with the disciplines or area studies aligned with the context of their primary texts, such
as Buddhist Studies, medieval studies, and Asian Studies, for example. Those who are
oriented to reading sacred texts thematically (e.g. systematically) may engage with other
disciplines that also engage in those themes (e.g. gender studies, critical race studies,
political philosophy).
Social Science
“Social science,” refers to scholars who primarily utilize social science methodologies
towards increasing the knowledge base in their particular field(s) of study.9 Nineteen
interviews with social scientists were collected across the participating institutions.
Social scientific approaches to religious studies span disciplines including anthropology,
sociology, political science, and psychology. While some social science scholars identified
relying on quantitative data, no one interviewee relied exclusively on this form of data,
and therefore this study’s findings cannot represent the research activities and needs of
scholars who rely primarily on quantitative data.
The majority of these scholars had affiliations (and cross-affiliations) in academic
departments such as religion, anthropology, and sociology, and their methods were also
primarily ethnographic in nature, some with overlapping uses of adjacent methods (e.g.
oral history, folklore studies) and others also relying on historical or textual analysis (e.g.
discourse analysis) but still grounded in social science theories and paradigms. Some
scholars from the sample received formal training in other disciplines but are now
working in a religious studies department, while others hold doctorates in religious
studies but due to their methodological approaches also engage with other disciplines.
The majority reported at least some engagement with religious studies, either through
attending conferences like the annual American Academy of Religion meeting or
publishing in religious studies journals. Area studies, such as South Asian Studies,
African American Studies, and other interdisciplinary areas, such as women, gender and
feminist studies, were also frequently cited as sites of engagement.
9 Their work contrasts with arts of ministry scholars, who also rely on social methods, but do so for applied purposes.
![Page 15: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 14
Arts of Ministry
“Arts of ministry” refers to scholarship that focuses on the spiritual and religious
practices of individuals and communities, not only to develop a deeper understanding of
those practices but also towards offering support for those practices and those who lead
others in those practices. Fourteen scholars aligned with the arts of ministry were
selected from the interviews collected by the participating institutions. Arts of ministry
scholars are found in departments and schools with professional offerings pertaining to
religious practice. Areas of scholarship that align with the arts of ministry include
practical theology, homiletics, missiology, pastoral care, religious education, and
congregational leadership, among others.
Reflecting the emphasis on practice, research in the arts of ministry tends towards social
science methodologies and highly interdisciplinary approaches to the literature and
theoretical frameworks utilized. These scholars aim to bring academic theory and
method into dialogue with religious teachings and perspectives. They described their
research process as involving qualitative or quantitative social science research, and, in
addition to the data they gathered themselves (e.g. surveys, interviews), they also rely on
quantitative data gathered from other sources (e.g. census), as well as secondary source
information primarily from academic books and articles. In addition to experiencing
difficulties commonly associated with social science research, such as finding informants
and managing field time, they experience additional challenges designing and
implementing projects because they often do not receive the same methodological
training or experience as social scientists. They engage in a variety of methodologies
including, but not limited to, case studies, discourse analysis, oral history, interviewing,
surveys, and self-reflection. Similarly, these scholars reported drawing on a variety of
theoretical and disciplinary frameworks to guide their research, such as those emanating
from education, psychology, ecology, sociology and anthropology, post-colonial studies,
public health, and neuroscience, among many others.
Discovering and Accessing Information
The majority of religious studies scholars reported relying on a combination of primary
and secondary source information, with a minority reporting that they rely exclusively on
secondary source information. Scholars’ sub-disciplinary and methodological
approaches determine the kind of primary and/or secondary sources they consult and
how readily they can access these sources. Those who rely on interdisciplinary
approaches reported challenges conducting primary and/or secondary source research
due to lack of specific disciplinary expertise.
![Page 16: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 15
When available, digital discovery and access have greatly improved these scholars’
research experiences with relatively few challenges. Most interviewees do not use
digitally-driven methodologies for discovering or pulling information from primary or
secondary information sources, including their associated records or metadata. Scholars
located in standalone seminaries and those conducting research on religions and
religious cultures beyond the West experience greater challenges in finding primary and
secondary sources.
Primary Sources
Religious studies scholars work with a wide variety of primary source materials, and the
kinds of materials they engage with are reflective of their sub-disciplinary and
methodological alignments. With the exception of arts of ministry scholars, most
religious studies scholars use primary source materials. Of these scholars, some are
using resources that are widely circulated and/or easily accessible digitally (e.g. critical
editions, through databases or from institutional special collections or archives that have
made their content available online). But for others the primary sources are available
through archives or special collections with minimal digital presence.
Reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of religious studies, some scholars who are not
trained as historians reported challenges navigating archives in general. As one
interviewee in theology explained, “I’m not a historian. And I’m not trained as a
historian…doing archival work is something that took me a while to like, figure out how
to do it.” Similarly, a social scientist remarked, “an archive [is] basically being made with
an historian’s mind.” These comments reflect that some religious studies scholars may
benefit from further training for working with archival collections as well as services and
structures designed to assist those with little to no experience conducting research in
archives.
Digital Affordances
Many scholars in religious studies reported benefitting from ever-increasing digital
access to primary source materials, when available. Those aligned with the humanities,
biblical studies, and theology reported working with databases of primary texts and
objects (e.g. coins) and digital collections. Scholars generally did not report having
difficulty with the functionality of digital collections. Some respondents noted
improvements to optical character recognition (OCR) capture to enable searching of
digitized documents in a variety of scripts and hoped that this technology will continue
to be improved. As one interviewee explained, “The advent of searchable texts is really
making an impact. It's very uneven, because optical character recognition is not terribly
![Page 17: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 16
good for the Arabic script. I can't just turn on that kind of function in Adobe, as I can
with something in English or French.”
“The advent of searchable texts is really making an impact.
It's very uneven, because optical character recognition is
not terribly good for the Arabic script. I can't just turn on
that kind of function in Adobe, as I can with something in
English or French.”
For those in smaller institutions a major barrier is not having institutional subscriptions
to primary source collections, which necessitates workarounds. As one interviewee at a
small seminary explained, “there [are] Latin texts that we don’t have access to… because
we're not a big university. So I'll turn to my Christian medievalists, [name of colleague at
another institution given]…and he'll look it up for me.” The challenges and workarounds
reported with accessing primary source collections available by subscription were similar
to the challenges associated with secondary source database access (see findings on
secondary sources below).
Scholars use a variety of tactics to find information about relevant collections online
including consulting specialized aggregates like ArchiveGrid or Archive Finder, searching
the open web through general search engines, and targeted searching of specific
institutional collections.10 While some reported positive experiences visiting physical
archives, the majority expressed that when available, digitized collections were a major
benefit to their work due to cost and time efficiencies. In lieu of digitized collections, the
opportunity to collect the information to analyze off-site is ideal. As discussed in the
previous section, scholars did not generally report using new methods to work with
digital content beyond text searching.
10 Further information about ArchiveGrid can be found here: https://beta.worldcat.org/archivegrid/. Further information
about Archive Finder can be found here: http://archives.chadwyck.com/marketing/index.jsp.
![Page 18: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 17
International Archives
Many interviewees reported working with archival collections physically located beyond
the United States. Working with these archives can present unique challenges depending
on the locale and type of archives consulted. Similar to findings from Ithaka S+R’s
report, “Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Historians,” interviewees
reported that many larger-scale Western European archives were generally well-
maintained and had good digital discovery and access points, necessitating less travel for
research. However, levels of maintenance and digital accessibility do vary by country,
scale and scope of the archives.11 Similarly, one interviewee in this project recounted
needing to travel to an archive in Valencia because they had run out of money to digitize
their materials, and, upon arrival, having difficulty locating information due to lack of
staff knowledge of the antiquated organizational system.
While scholars conducting research in U.S. and Western
European archives report at least some reduction in travel
due to increased online access to records, many scholars
working in archives located beyond the West must still visit
collections in person.
While scholars conducting research in U.S. and Western European archives report at
least some reduction in travel due to increased online access to records, many scholars
working in archives located beyond the West must still visit collections in person.12 These
scholars were primarily working on topics pertaining to Islam and religion in Asian
countries (including research on Buddhism, Hinduism, and Christianity.13 Although
archival research is typically associated with humanities scholars, this group of scholars
was evenly composed of social scientists. For some of these scholars the challenges of
11 Rutner and Schonfeld, 13-14.
12 Lara Putnam similarly observes that while the increased digital availability of primary texts is transforming history into
more of a “desk discipline” this digitization is uneven (e.g. Western sources, newspaper sources disproportionately
represented). See Lara Putnam, “The Transnational and the Text Searchable: Digitized Sources and the Shadows they
Cast,” The American Historical Review 121, no. 2 (2016): 395.
13 Archives in other countries and continents were not represented in the sample (e.g. no one interviewee discussed
archives in African countries).
![Page 19: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 18
working on topics pertaining to religious practice beyond the West can be mediated by
working with collections held or made digitally available from Western institutions, but,
depending on topic.
Respondents highlighted many different challenges associated with conducting research
in countries beyond the West ranging from discovery to access to the physical condition
of the materials. Respondents reported that determining what records are in collections
and locating them is difficult because collections are often not processed and inventoried
systematically and in some cases are deteriorating over time. As one interviewee
explained about one experience, “while I'm just kind of pulling stuff off the shelves, I find
what I'm looking for bound inside another book that no one knew was there.” Even when
materials are successfully located, barriers to preservation may still prevent access. As
one interviewee explained, “Libraries in India are frequently not in a position to preserve
what they've got subject to white ants, termites, fungus, mold, water. Things that you
even saw ten years ago, you go back and look at it, and they have been damaged.”
Another interviewee discussing archives in South Asia also noted, “The quality of
preservation is often abysmal and manuscripts that may be recognized as valuable ones
have begun to disintegrate. The climate's not conducive to preservation. There are
silverfish running all through them, wormholes and things like that.”
Interviewees also often explained how they had to build relationships over years of
working with the same archives to ensure access or relying on local contacts. One
interviewee noted, “Egypt is always very, very difficult, because the librarians there shut
down requests, because they say, "This comes from America. We're not going to work
with that." Or Europe. It's different when you are there and you develop relations, but e-
mail doesn't help.” Another interviewee commented, “I've been doing this long enough
now that pretty much anywhere I am that has materials, I can get right to…A lot of my
foreign research is dependent on connections and the goodwill of people.” Similarly, it
can also be difficult to get permission to make copies for future use, necessitating work-
arounds, such as getting others to make copies and/or making copies without permission
or recording as much information in hand-written notes. As one interviewee highlighted,
“getting materials out of Tibet or China itself is extraordinarily difficult. Many of those
archives are closed, they’re not open. So the only way you can get access, if you get
access at all, is if you know someone who can maybe locate something and kind of make
a copy on the side, quietly.” Another interviewee noted, “I might even cheat and take
photographs when no one is looking in the name of scholarship [but] mostly, I just work
within the limitations that are set for me.” It’s also important to highlight that non-
Western archives are not universally restrictive, one interviewee explained his
experience with Sri Lankan temple archives as follows: “I will ask if I can borrow it for a
few hours to go make a copy and they'll always say sure, why not.”
![Page 20: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 19
Scholars also highlighted positive developments such as collaborative projects to digitize
and make available materials such as the Endangered Archives Programme at the British
Library, and Nepalese-German Manuscript Cataloguing Project (NGMCP) by the
Nepalese government and the University of Hamburg.14 One interviewee expressed,
regarding the Endangered Archives Programme, “I wish in our own way we here at the
seminary could support them.” Considering that scholars conducting research beyond
the West often must develop relationships with archives in those locations, there is
opportunity in leveraging these connections and scholars’ interest towards developing
collaborations with those archives.
Religious Archives
Religious archives--archives in religious settings including seminaries, theology or
divinity schools, church organizations (locally and internationally), and religious
societies and orders--represent another source of primary information for some religious
studies scholars. 15 Those who engaged with these kinds of archives highlighted in
particular their experiences at archives in church organizations and religious societies
and orders. An underlying theme is that these archives are not set up to cater to
academic research, which can pose a challenge to scholars.16
Interviewees noted that religious archives often rely on volunteers in addition to or in
lieu of professional archivists, mainly from the denomination or order the archives
represents. While the volunteers are perceived as friendly and helpful to the best of their
abilities, some concern was expressed that they lack familiarity with academic research
and that can be a barrier to providing research support. Similarly, lack of funding and
resources also makes discovery of content challenging: some archives lack
14 Further information about the Endangered Archives Programme can be found here: http://eap.bl.uk/. Further information
about the Nepalese-German Manuscript Cataloguing Project (NGMCP) can be found here: https://www.aai.uni-
hamburg.de/en/forschung/ngmcp.
15 For examples of how Religious Archiving is conceptualized, see “Archivists of Religious Collections Section,” Society of
American Archivists, accessed October 5, 2016, http://archivists.org/groups/archivists-of-religious-collections-section, and
“Religious Archives Special Interest Section,” The Association of Canadian Archivists, accessed October 5, 2016,
http://archivists.ca/content/religious-archives-special-interest-section.
16 Academics are just one group that use religious archives, which also includes affiliates of the Church or religious
organization the archives serves, and other lay populations, most notably, for genealogical research. For further
information about the unique usage patterns and considerations in religious archives, see, for example, Robert C. Ray,
“No One Has Ever Seen God,” The Use of Religious Archives for Non-Religious Purposes,” Journal of Religious and
Theological Information 7, no. 3-4 (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10477840902783010 and Jonathan Lawler, “Use in
Protestant Archives of the United States,” Journal of Archival Organization 11, no. 3-4 (2013), 146-174,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2013.939885.
![Page 21: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 20
comprehensive findings aids and include backlogs of unprocessed records. Interviewees,
however, also emphasized how much they appreciate and value the work of the
volunteers.
Another theme that emerged is the perception that religious organizations are more
restrictive with providing scholars with access to materials due to the archives’ primary
mission to serve those organizations. As one interviewee explained, “there's a proprietary
sense of things that outsiders shouldn’t see.” Access to documents may be prevented or
the documents may be heavily redacted. Winning trust of those in charge of access is
seen as important by building friendly rapport and clearly communicating the
motivations for the research.17
Secondary Sources
The widespread digital availability of secondary sources provides religious studies
scholars with more opportunities to discover and access this material. There is some
variation in how this material is discovered based on whether scholars are aligned with
sub-disciplines within religious studies such as the arts of ministry, theology,, or biblical
studies, and, by extension, whether they seek to engage with literature from other
disciplines or are more concerned with how they engage with the literature within their
own discipline. Across the sub-disciplines scholars use multiple platforms in tandem to
discover content, often as a tactic to combat anxieties that no one platform is
comprehensive and to maximize other affordances that vary across platform. Access to
secondary content is a challenge for those in some standalone seminaries and for
scholars who research religions beyond the West.
Variations in Discovery by Sub-Discipline and Research Method
While religious studies scholars did not report using specific, systematic methodologies
for discovering secondary source information they do display some patterns regarding
discovery that mirror their sub-disciplinary alignments and underlying methodological
approaches to developing their research projects. For example, some scholars in arts of
ministry and theology reported developing projects based on themes and drawing on
research from a variety of disciplines, which necessities more open and broad
approaches to discovering secondary content across a variety of platforms. For arts of
17 The issue of building appropriate and effective relationships with creators and custodians of information resonates with
the experiences of scholars in other disciplines. For example, art historians report challenges navigating relationships with
the artists they study. See Roger C. Schonfeld and Matthew P. Long, Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Art
Historians (New York: Ithaka S+R, 2014), 13-14.
![Page 22: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 21
ministry scholars, secondary research from multiple disciplines, particularly in the social
sciences, is used so that it can be applied to issues relevant to the arts of ministry (e.g.
using insights from psychology to inform discussion on pastoral counselling). Due to
their lack of expertise in these various disciplines, however, some arts of ministry
scholars face barriers in determining the best places to find literature and synthesize the
content effectively for their purposes. As one respondent explained, “I struggle…with
finding the right psychology and sociology materials and even reading and
understanding what they're saying.” Theology scholars who seek to discover secondary
content thematically do so because their research aims are to explore, as one interviewee
characterized, “where other discourses put pressure on theology.” These scholars report
difficulty keeping up with the discourse beyond theology that they seek to engage with
and discovering new areas of thinking. By extension, one interviewee suggested that they
prefer the method of not keeping up comprehensively, but rather engaging with
literature beyond theology in a targeted fashion on a project-by-project basis.
In contrast to theology scholars, biblical studies scholars reported difficulty keeping up
with the secondary literature in their own field, which reflects the relative autonomy of
biblical studies as a sub-discipline. Their difficulty keeping up with secondary content is
also a noteworthy counterpoint to their relative ease managing primary information, as
is discussed later in this report. These interviewees characterized the secondary biblical
studies literature as vast due to the long history of the field. As one interviewee
explained, “Biblical studies is such a massive field, which has been producing secondary
literature since the early 1800s, or the late 1700s, that nobody ever tries to be or can be
comprehensive anymore.” While some see databases as beneficial for sorting through
this vast literature others report finding these tools lacking and report relying on other
approaches to cut through the literature, such as informal colleague recommendation,
particularly when they perceive comprehensiveness as impossible. As some interviewees
highlighted some discomfort with newer database search functionality, this suggests that
improved instruction on database searching techniques may be helpful for rectifying
these challenges. Considering that Bible scholars generally rely on citation management
tools for reading canonical primary texts, synching those tools with discovery tools for
secondary literature may have potential as an alternative mechanism for managing the
secondary literature in this field.
Discovery as a Multifaceted Endeavor
While approaches to secondary source discovery vary by sub-discipline, certain
characteristics cut across the group as a whole and resonate with larger patterns of
secondary source discovery in the humanities and social sciences more widely.
Interviewees are largely reliant on and appreciative of the affordances of digital discovery
![Page 23: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 22
tools. They do not generally report using specific, systematic methodologies when
searching for content using these tools such as by tracking search results numerically.
Automated approaches to discovering content, such as through RSS feeds or customized
updates from databases or journals, were rarely reported. In addition to personally
searching digital platforms, some interviewees relied on graduate student assistants and
librarians to aid in their searching. However, colleague recommendations and following
up on footnotes and citations were just as, if not more, likely to be cited as strategies for
discovery than librarians. Respondents did not report relying on physical browsing in
the library stacks as an initial discovery point although some reflected on the value of
open browsing that these organizational systems traditionally afford.
The majority of religious studies scholars concurrently rely
on searching databases and platforms beyond their
library’s offerings such as through WorldCat, Google
Scholar, Google Books, Amazon, or general web browser.
Interviewees reported a mixed approach to secondary source discovery using digital
platforms, in part due to delineations between focused searching for specific sources and
open or broader searching. The library is not the only stop for most and not even the first
stop for some when seeking secondary source information. A typical response reflecting
a mixed approach to discovery: “Sometimes it's just on Amazon. I'll be looking up stuff
and I'll come across a book that I think would be helpful or sometimes it's just doing
searches through the library website. Other times it'll be something that was written
about in a journal, a book described in a journal, book review or that kind of thing or
mentioned to me by a colleague.” The majority of religious studies scholars concurrently
rely on searching databases and platforms beyond their library’s offerings such as
through WorldCat, Google Scholar, Google Books, Amazon, or general web browser.
Google Books and Amazon were highlighted for offering digital previews and Amazon
was further highlighted for the algorithmic recommendation function based on
purchasing habits.
The use of the library catalog in addition to other platforms reflects that while library
catalogs are increasingly designed to provide multiple functions concurrently (open and
focused discovery, access, citation management), researchers intuitively work from a
combination of platforms to maximize the functionality offered by the various platforms
in tandem and the affordances of working across different platforms concurrently. In
![Page 24: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 23
this landscape the multi-functional design of library catalogs can be a barrier to effective
use: some respondents were not fully aware of or not comfortable with the functionalities
that enable researchers to tailor their searching that enable open and focused discovery
(e.g. Boolean searching, selecting and de-selecting from menus). As will be discussed in
the following section on information management and preservation, some scholars take
advantage of cross-functionalities (e.g. saving bibliographic information from the library
catalog through citation management software), while others continue to use more
idiosyncratic citation management approaches and/or are unaware of these
functionalities.
Barriers to Access
Some scholars from standalone seminaries do not have access through their institutions
to particular databases and/or journals. In some cases this is because the scholars
engage in interdisciplinary work, which involves seeking out literature in fields beyond
what is conceptualized as the purview of their institution’s mission. Others highlighted
the difficulty of transitioning from larger institutions where they did their PhDs to the
smaller institutions where they work that do not have the same level of access to
resources. They utilize workaround strategies such as interlibrary loan, personally
reaching out to colleagues (e.g. with better institutional access, or because they know
they have the content in their possession, or because the colleague authored the piece),
and independently purchasing items.
Beyond the barrier of a scholar’s specific institutional location, another major barrier to
accessing content is if scholars are conducting research on topics about religious culture
beyond Western geographic settings, regardless of the institutional location of the
scholar.18 As one interviewee working on Chinese-Christian theology explained, “I mainly
buy my own books in Beijing. I have my own library in my room. We have decent book-
buying budgets here. Most of the things I need are on my own shelves, or they're difficult
to find because they're available in Chinese databases some of which we can access, some
of which we can't always.” Similarly, an interviewee at another institution whose
research focuses on Buddhist theology noted, “the only thing that causes me routine
irritation here…is the fact that we do not have complete, individual access to the Chinese
databases” and that they also rely on a private library to fill in the gaps and inter-library
loan, whenever possible.
18 While this issue appeared to cut across geographic region, it is important to note that only certain locales were
represented in the study (South East Asia and the Middle East), whereas other areas were under represented or not
represented at all (e.g. Africa, Russia). The findings presented here are not intended to provide the definitive
representation of the relative availability of content by region or country, but rather, to highlight how relatively similar
challenges to access cut across accessing secondary information emanating from a variety of locales.
![Page 25: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 24
Many scholars of Islam also remarked on the explosion of published texts relevant to
their research emanating from the geographic areas their research engages with,
including edited volumes that contain primary texts and commentaries and secondary
works by scholars beyond the West. The majority of interviewees rely on on-the-ground
discovery and personally collecting this information. As one interviewee explained, “I
have a better library in this room and at home than most American libraries put
together. In fact, I would say all American libraries put together for the stuff I work on.”
Discovery can also be a challenge because of the uneven to non-existent inclusion of this
scholarship in Western academic databases and lack of subscription to journals and
databases produced beyond the West in U.S. academic libraries.
As the comments above reflect, many scholars reported acquiring texts during research
trips, not only because more texts are available abroad but also because they can be
acquired there more cheaply. They also acquire edited volumes of primary texts through
other collectors, mainly academics working in the same areas, but also, in one case, a
website with a collection of texts maintained by “a guy in New Jersey." They recognize
that some of this sharing activity may be unauthorized. Scholars also acquire these texts
through personal networks, including contacting authors directly.
The barriers to access for scholars conducting research on
religious culture beyond the West is connected by those
scholars to a sense of marginalization in the academy.
The barriers to access for scholars conducting research on religious culture beyond the
West is connected by those scholars to a sense of marginalization in the academy. One
interviewee, for example, highlighted how their library’s collection is lacking in
contemporary South Asian Hindu content because “there doesn’t really seem to be a
person who currently has the languages for one to be able to talk to -- I'm sure there's
someone who can speak Arabic, but no one who can work in Urdu and Hindi and these
other languages to be able to judge what to buy and how.” Another interviewee expressed
frustration about how the collection at their institution is unbalanced with relatively little
information on Islam, “I mean there’s six shelves on New Testament criticisms."
Despite this sense of marginalization, the interviewees were ambivalent about their
expectations for U.S. academic libraries to provide access to secondary materials
produced beyond the West, particularly books. While one informant suggested that U.S.
academic libraries should be collecting these kinds of texts, others suggested it would be
![Page 26: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 25
impossible and impractical for most libraries to keep up. While some anecdotal evidence
from the study reflected that some scholars do work closely with their institutional
libraries to improve collections (e.g. one interviewee in Islamic studies is working with
their institutional library to make some of the texts they have personally collected
digitally available and another scholar in Islamic studies indicated they would be
interested in working with the library more closely to improve the collection), there is
potential for much more collaborative work between librarians and scholars to be done
in this area. As these scholars do not expect in-house expertise from libraries in their
research areas and they spend considerable time building up their own collections, it
may be a better strategy for libraries to work more closely with scholars to make those
personal collections more widely available.
Information Management
While the types of information religious studies scholars produce and collect vary by
their sub-disciplines, they universally contend with the challenge of managing vast
arrays of information that they produce and collect in the process of conducting their
research. Biblical studies scholars and some social scientists benefit from software
designed to facilitate the analysis phase of their research, and some scholars across the
sub-disciplines also rely on software for managing citations and their writing. Regardless
of sub-disciplinary alignment, interviewees reported idiosyncratic practices overall for
organizing and storing their information. The struggle with digital approaches to citation
management and information storage and experience uncertainty around destroying and
preserving information following their personal use.
While the types of information religious studies scholars
produce and collect vary by their sub-disciplines, they
universally contend with the challenge of managing vast
arrays of information that they produce and collect in the
process of conducting their research.
Type of Information Collected Mirrors Sub-Discipline
The types of information that scholars produce and collect over the course of conducting
their research varies by sub-discipline. Those who conduct humanistic-inflected research
![Page 27: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 26
(including those aligned with theology or biblical studies) generally characterized
themselves as information “consumers” as opposed to “producers.” They reported
collecting and analyzing primary and secondary source material in both physical and
digital forms through annotation, note taking, and draft writing as opposed to creating
their own data and/or manipulating pre-existing data sets. The relative lack of
engagement with creating or manipulating data reflects that digital research methods,
including those associated with the digital humanities, are not widely practiced in
religious studies.
In addition to consuming pre-existing information, scholars who engage in social
science-oriented research, including arts of ministry scholars and historians who use oral
history methods also reported creating data for their research. The data they reported
creating was primarily qualitative in nature including: recordings and transcriptions of
interviews, documentation of events and activities through field notes, photography or
video. Ethnographers in particular are also noteworthy for collecting vast arrays of
content created by their informants and communities of study such as literature,
newspaper articles, movies, maps, social media exchanges, and other ephemera.
Software for Research and Writing
Biblical studies scholars and some social scientists rely on software to facilitate the
analysis phase of their research by providing platforms to gather, annotate and search
information. Some use software to manage information in particular formats, such as
photographs, but these practices were not consistent or widespread. While some scholars
across the sub-disciplines report relying on more general software to manage citations
and their writing, others report barriers to adopting these practices.
For work with canonical primary texts, biblical studies scholars utilize biblical software
such as Logos, BibleWorks, and Accordance, which they value for such affordances as
quickly searching large amounts of text in lieu of memorizing, annotating texts, and
reading texts and linking annotations to the same text across multiple languages.19 While
the affordances vary between software offerings, interviewees reported prior use as the
main reason for working with a particular kind of software. For example, one interviewee
noted that they perceive Accordance to be better for their kind of Jewish scholarship but
that they continue to use BibleWorks because they have been using it for twenty years.
This choice, however, does not necessarily reflect a reticence to learn new software, but
also the reality that many have built up their personal annotations and notes in one
19 For further information about Logos, see: https://www.logos.com/; for further information about BibleWorks, see:
https://www.logos.com/; for further information about Accordance, see: https://www.accordancebible.com/.
![Page 28: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 27
particular system, which ultimately outweighs other benefits that may come from
switching.
Some social scientists reported relying on qualitative analysis software such as NVivo for
storing and analyzing their data.20 While arts of ministry scholars also engage in social
science research, they are less likely to rely on the qualitative analysis software. They
reported lack of familiarity and training as the primary reasons for not using these kinds
of software, but expressed interest in receiving support to learn how to use these tools.
These requests were expressed in the context of their general requests for support in
social science research methodologies.
Some scholars across the sub-disciplinary spectrum report relying on software for
general research and/or writing management, such as Nota Bene, OneNote, EndNote
and Zotero.21 The ability to work with content in multiple languages is a consideration
for some, but it was also noted that the ability to do so is generally improving on various
platforms. Due to the learning curve and investment associated with entering
information into a particular platform, many report working with the same system over
the long term, often beginning during their graduate education. As one interviewee
explained regarding their use of Nota Bene “close to 30 years ago, there was no other
program that did that. Now other programs have caught up but... a lot of it is just in my
Nota Bene files.” Some report overcoming prior barriers to learning new software by
seeking support from graduate assistants, librarians, and others who are already familiar
with the tools. As one interviewee explained, “I have used Zotero and I -- it’s actually
something my research assistant was trained in through a service offered by the library
and he would often do that for me… or some reason I remember my research assistant
being told when he was taking this class that EndNote wasn’t that great so I’ve never
used EndNote.” Similarly, for those who do not use software for managing their
information, lack of time to overcome the learning curve with new technology was cited
as a concern. They are often unfamiliar with the full capabilities of the software or that
software is available that can help them manage their research, which may also be a
barrier to exploring and adopting new software.
20 For further information about NVivo, see http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-product.
21 For further information about Nota Bene, see: https://www.notabene.com/; for further information about OneNote, see:
https://www.onenote.com/; for further information about EndNote, see: http://endnote.com/; for further information about
Zotero, see: https://www.zotero.org/.
![Page 29: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 28
Idiosyncratic Approaches to Organization and Storage
Scholars generally develop idiosyncratic approaches to organizing and storing the
information associated with their research. Their organizational systems, including
conventions for naming and grouping information, are highly personal and developed
over the course of their careers. These scholars rely on common tools and materials to
create their systems, such as series of Microsoft Word documents placed in folders, and
physical documents in folders in boxes and filing cabinets, which they often recognize
are not ideal for quickly searching for information across their entire collection. Many
create organizational systems to mirror and facilitate their writing processes. Others
admit to not having much of a system at all and being disorganized. Those who use
research analysis or management software often still have other caches of information
organized and stored elsewhere.
Interviewees reported storing information in a variety of places, both physically in
institutional and home offices, and digitally on personal computers, external hard drives,
and through cloud storage through their institutions or commercial entities (e.g.
Dropbox, Google Drive). In some cases this information may be duplicated in different
storage mechanisms, and in others the information is scattered across the different
storage mechanisms. As a result, some struggle with remembering where their
information is stored. As one interviewee explained, “I'm getting these big, multi-
megabyte text files now. I have some of them on Google Books [sic] and some of them on
a hard drive and some of them on Dropbox, but maybe I should just do the subscription
for the larger memory on Dropbox so I could have it all in one place so I don't keep
wondering where I've stashed these things.” In some cases this scattering practice
reflects that no one cloud-based storage system provides sufficient space for free.
Seeking Support for Long Term Preservation
Beyond managing and storing the information associated with their research for their
more immediate use, scholars must also contend with how their information is preserved
over time, possibly with a view towards making that information available to others.
Their plans and attitudes towards preserving their research information in the long term
was mixed, with some not perceiving their information as valuable beyond their own use,
others being required to destroy at least some of the information by their institutional
review boards, and other still interested in exploring long term solutions but unsure of
how to proceed. They find the expectations for how they should collect and maintain
information in the long term unclear, including whether and how their information
should be donated to memory institutions. As one interviewee noted, “It’s easier to
collect the material than it is to actually pull it together and to, to make arrangements to
![Page 30: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 29
donate it and I need to do that.” In this confused landscape many expressed a need for
support for navigating their information management in the long term, both in terms of
their own collection and storage and towards making arrangements for future use by
other researchers.
For some scholars, preserving information in the long term is not possible or desirable.
Some interviewees noted that they wanted to destroy their information but were unsure
of when it is appropriate to do so. Conversely, those who conduct research on human
subjects may be required to destroy or redact components of the information they
collected or in particular formats. For example, redacted transcripts may be acceptable
but the original audio recordings must be destroyed. While being cognizant of the need
to destroy the information, some expressed confusion over what needed to be destroyed
and suspected that they had not properly complied. Some also expressed frustration with
requirements to destroy information because it could be useful to other researchers.
Prior to destroying the information associated with their research or donating some or
all of it to an institution, scholars reported typically keeping their personal information
collections for long periods of time, sometimes spanning multi-decade careers. As
mentioned above, the choice to hold onto this information isn’t necessarily intentional:
scholars often chose to hold onto information out of habit or uncertainty about whether
or not they should dispose of it. Regardless of intentionality, maintaining content over
the long term in their personal collections is an issue for scholars, particularly as they
contend with evolving formats and deteriorating content, which they don’t have the
resources or capacity to migrate. For many, the information they collected earlier in their
career is degraded or in formats that are difficult to access or even obsolete. As one
interviewee explains, “For a person like me who actually wants to be able to go back and
keep all the electronic files just like I would in a file cabinet and be able to pull them out,
well, that's not so simple. That really frustrates me.” Another interviewee suggests, “[we
need to] find ways to store our data more cheaply and more easily – where the formats
just update themselves or things just happen automatically.” Another barrier to long
term preservation and wider use is that scholars do not have preservation in mind when
collecting and managing the data at the outset, which means it may have been stored in
ways that destroys the content over time.
While it was more typical for interviewees to report not having considered or made
concrete plans for donating their personal information collections to institutions for
future use by others, those who did highlighted the role of proactive librarians and
archivists in making these decisions. For example, one interviewee noted: “I've actually
been approached by several librarians who are interested in archiving some of the data
from the first interview set that I have. …So I'm thinking about how to do that and in
![Page 31: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 30
what ways I would do that.” Similarly, another interviewee highlighted: “I’ve been
thinking about offering the material to a library collection. I've been talking to, for
instance, the library [at their home institution] as well, but also I was approached by a
reference librarian at [another academic library geographically located near their
research community].”
It is also important to highlight that interviewees did not generally report concerns with
the availability or long term preservation of their published content. This is particularly
noteworthy in the context of interviewees’ reported preference for Academia.edu, as
discussed in the following section. The issues of Academia.edu’s business model (and the
implications for how their activities or the security of when their information will be
preserved) was not an issue to respondents.
Audience, Output and Credit
While many scholars perceive that their work on religion has wider value beyond
academia, their primary focus remains on traditional scholarly outputs due to the
expectations associated with their professional development as academics. Overall
awareness and engagement with open access is low but the perceived importance of
more freely sharing work as enabled by social media platforms such as Academia.edu is
high. Those who conceptualize their work at the intersection of theory and faith-based
practice contend with achieving balance between academic and non-academic publishing
activities. Engaging with society-at-large is not prioritized by most scholars despite their
perceptions that their work and religious studies as field is of wider value.
Primary Emphasis on Scholarly Outputs
The majority of interviewees reported a primary focus on producing peer-reviewed
journal articles, chapters in edited monographs, and single-authored scholarly
monographs. They highlighted that scholarly outputs remain the primary end goal due to
the expectations for tenure and promotion. Beyond peer-reviewed published outputs,
interviewees also reported participating in a variety of other typical scholarly venues to
communicate their work. These venues include invited talks, conference presentations,
and contributing encyclopedia or dictionary entries. Alternative scholarly outputs, such
as those associated with the digital humanities and quantitative data, or with
experimental academic publishing venues (e.g. Syndicate Theology), were noted by a
minority of the interviewees. Similarly, collaborative projects and co-authorship on
research outputs were not widely reported.
![Page 32: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 31
The key concerns scholars noted about publishing their research were connected to their
professional advancement. Typical concerns include producing an acceptable number of
outputs and publishing in appropriate venues based on reputation and audience. In
some cases interviewees reported that their sub-disciplinary areas (e.g. history) privilege
full-length, single-author monographs, particularly towards granting tenure and
promotion. As one interviewee explained, “I don't get credit with a co-authored book,
when I would love to do collaborative work like that.” Similarly, creating critical editions
and translations was also commonly mentioned as an important endeavor in religious
studies alongside frustration that these projects are less valued towards tenure and
promotion than writing articles or books. Many highlighted the freedom that comes with
achieving tenure to publish less and focus on different kinds of outputs. Inability to
frame alternative outputs, such as those associated with the digital humanities, in the
context of tenure and promotion is an ongoing barrier to pursuing those kinds of work.
The venue of publication varied by sub-discipline and institutional home of the
respondent. Those aligned with religious studies in conjunction with the more general
humanities and social sciences seek to publish with presses and publications geared
toward academic audiences that specialize in their sub-disciplinary areas as the tenor of
the project dictates. Many receive their training in disciplines other than religious
studies and continue to publish at least in part in those other areas as opposed to
exclusively publishing in religious studies. In contrast, some arts of ministry prefer to
seek out religious or theological publishers. Some interviewees expressed anxiety over
the state of the academic publishing industry, highlighting difficulties getting their work
published due to increased expectations around marketability even in university presses.
A small group of interviewees reported publishing their academic work in venues beyond
the West and they perceived their practices as atypical. Motivations for publishing
scholarly work in these venues despite the associated barriers include fostering
collaboration with scholars beyond the West and the opportunity to disseminate
research to audiences who will be interested in the findings. They noted ongoing barriers
to publishing scholarly work beyond Western academia such as: lack of knowledge or
resources for translating work, difficulties navigating the terrain of publishing beyond
the West and lack of recognition at their institution for such endeavors.
![Page 33: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 32
Ambivalence towards Open Access
The majority of interviewees, regardless of their sub-disciplinary or institutional
affiliation, reported minimal awareness of or engagement with open access frameworks
for disseminating their research in either green or gold varieties.22 Their perceptions of
and the level of prioritization they assign open access publishing is consistent with
scholars in the humanities and social sciences more widely.23 Many displayed confusion
over the meaning of terms such as “open source” versus “open access.”
The majority of interviewees did not report regularly publishing in open access journals,
nor did they report paying for their articles to be open access in proprietary journals or
that their institutions or funders required them to do so. When prompted as to why they
had not published with open access journals, interviewees primarily expressed that their
priority was to publish in appropriate venues for professional advancement and that in
their sub-disciplinary areas these venues were not open access. Others expressed general
distrust or uncertainty of open access as a model that can publish work appropriate for
academic standards generally and, by extension, that it would not be productive towards
their tenure and promotion in particular. Similarly, the minority of respondents who had
published with fully open access journals did not generally seek out these venues
intentionally, but rather, had sought out journals for reasons typically associated with
academic publishing, such as the publication is peer reviewed and considered
appropriate for their subject matter.
Several respondents expressed that they preferred proprietary publishing models
because they felt that authors and publishers should financially benefit from publishing
academic work. In contrast, those who had not previously published in open access
journals generally highlighted that they would be amenable to publishing under such
models as long as they adhered to standards that were complementary to academic
publishing protocols and could be recognized in tenure and promotion processes
accordingly. As one interviewee explained, “For me, where I am in the early part of my
career, I'd be open to open source…so long as they're peer reviewed.” Similarly, another
22 “Gold” open access generally refers to open access journals, regardless of business model whereas “green” generally
refers to open access repositories. For further information, see Peter Suber, Open Access (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012),
175.
23 See, for example, Martin Paul Eve, Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts Controversies and the Future
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 30-34; Stephen Pinfield, “Making Open Access Work: The ‘State-of-the-
Art’ in Providing Open Access to Scholarly Literature,” Online Information Review 39, no. 5: 612-614.
![Page 34: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 33
interviewee highlighted, “I think that's a great thing. It's just in terms of what I have been
working on th[ere] hasn't [been] the right journal.”
Interviewees also reported minimal engagement with open access repositories.24 A
minority of interviewees at institutions with such repositories reported depositing their
work. In the process of depositing, “leg work” from librarians is appreciated and fosters
participation. As one interviewee explained, “I just got an email yesterday from the
person at the library in charge of that who found out for me all the journals in which I
have published, and gave me a list of ‘here's what we can put in the repository’…And it's
up to me to go track down the terms of all these agreements. I'll probably never get
around to it [on my own], they want to build that repository so they are doing the leg
work for me.” A small group reported putting copies of their published work on personal
websites.
Respondents were more likely to report engagement with other forms of open access
dissemination beyond journal and repository models, primarily in association with
producing secondary outputs other than their primarily academic dissemination
activities. These forms include writing for blogs, departmental websites, or
organizational online newsletters. Awareness of or interest in open models for publishing
monographs was virtually non-existent among respondents with the exception of one
interviewee engaged with digital humanities research.
When asked about open access, many respondents noted that they utilize Academia.edu,
both by posting their own work, and to discover and acquire the work of others.25 These
respondents were generally unsure as to whether Academia.edu constitutes “open
access,” or is adjacent to open access, which suggests that they are unaware of the
nuances of how open access is defined and that these definitions (and their associated
business models) are not a primary motivator for participating in open dissemination
models, but rather, they are interested in unfettered discovery and access to information.
As discussed in the previous section, they also did not report awareness or concerns
around the long-term preservation capabilities of Academia.edu. Their ease with
24 The lack of participation in institutional open access repositories found here is reflective of wider trends traversing
disciplines and institutions. For example, as of July 2016 the University of California’s state-created repository is only
being used by 25% of professors even with using a computer system that automatically emails professors with links for
putting articles into the repository. See Paul Baken, “The U. of California’s Open-Access Promise Hits a Snag: The
Faculty,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 7 2016, http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-U-of-California-s/237044.
25 Other academic social network platforms were not generally mentioned by respondents, which may reflect disciplinary
preferences.
![Page 35: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 34
Academia.edu also reflects how the platform enables an activity that academics already
practice: relying on their networks to discover and acquire research sources.
When engaging with Academia.edu, respondents also expressed mixed attitudes as to
their knowledge of and compliance with copyright. While some expressed awareness of
compliance of copyright issues when using the service, (e.g. “anything that I publish I’ll
put up on my Academia site unless the journal or book tells me not to”), others expressed
uncertainty and that they and their colleagues post regardless of that uncertainty. For
example, one respondent noted: “I'm a little bit hazy on the legality of this – but most
people that I know, everything that gets published is up on their Academia page pretty
quickly.” Similarly, another interviewee noted, “I don't know if it's completely open-
access or available to registered users. I haven't done that. Some of my publications have
ended up [on Academia.edu] because other people have put them there. That's okay with
me, but it's probably not entirely kosher.”
Challenges Engaging with Audiences beyond Academia
Some scholars noted that they also share their research with audiences beyond academia
because their work is relevant to a wider public. Those who do so typically position these
efforts as secondary to or in conflict with their scholarly publishing practices.
Interviewees also reported different experiences and challenges with disseminating their
research beyond academia depending on which publics, and by extension, which venues,
they seek to engage with.
Religious studies scholars who disseminate their work in the context of public
scholarship report producing such outputs as articles in mainstream media publications,
posts on blogs, participation in podcasts, as well as workshops and public talks. One
significant form of output in this area is represented by biblical studies scholars, who
produce and disseminate insight into biblical texts for audiences beyond academia, for
example, through venues like the Society of Biblical Literature’s Bible Odyssey. Public
scholarship is also an opportunity for some scholars to engage beyond Western contexts,
including with the communities that they research. As one interviewee noted, “Most of
my scholarly works have been published in English. And for the Korean, I'll write like a
blog and not necessarily scholarly work. More like, you know, public engagement thing."
Public engagement also represents an opportunity to challenge negative perceptions of
particular faith practices in the mainstream.
Barriers to pursuing public scholarship generally include lack of time and reward for
non-academic publishing within academia, difficulties seeking and translating academic
work for legibility beyond its originally intended audiences, and challenges navigating
![Page 36: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 35
new digital media technologies. The barriers that religious studies scholars experience
are consistent with scholars in other disciplines and various career stages.26 How
religious studies scholars manage intersections between their personal and public media
identities did not yield sufficient findings, which suggests grounds for further study.27
One interviewee in this study highlighted the challenges with public engagement when
communities are critical of the concept of Western academic approaches to studying
their religion, citing their own area of research on Hinduism. They noted that “now
books are banned in India that are written by American scholars.”28
Beyond engaging with the general public, some scholars also displayed unique
publishing practices because their research falls at the intersection of theory and faith-
based practice, which necessitates engaging with religious audiences beyond academia.
As one interviewee explained, “there's a balance where I want to contribute to the wider
academic world but I'm also committed to the life of the church.” Typical forms of
engagement including writing for blogs, magazines, journals and news outlets of
organizations associated with their institutions or other organizations serving faith
communities, many of which are open access. Some of these scholars report producing
trade publications and other monographs oriented toward educating lay audiences, and
in some cases, these publications may function as the primary output in lieu of scholarly
publications (when allowable due to the culture of the institution or if the scholar is not
focused on promotion). They experience challenges seeking appropriate venues for their
work because their research is perceived as not academic enough for university presses
but too academic for religious presses. Some report achieving balance by focusing on
“denominational” outputs later in their scholarly careers when they are less focused on
tenure and promotion. As some denominational publishing houses have academic
branches while others do not, this is also a major consideration when determining an
appropriate venue for work. Some scholars in this group also report relying on self-
publishing.
26 For further information see Jessie Daniels and Polly Thistletwaite, Being a Scholar in the Digital Era (Bristol: Policy
Press, 2016), 100-107.
27 For example, some scholars may experience larger volumes of requests to comment on their research in public based
on their area of study and trends in public discourse. Scholars also have varying experiences when participating in the
public sphere due to their positionality due to gender, race or religion.
28 This observation is similar to Wendy Doniger’s in the Chronicle of Higher Education, which also highlights the particular
challenges facing Western scholars of Hinduism due to the punitive actions of particular Hindu groups that challenge the
validity of Westerners and non-Hindus as scholars of Hinduism. See Wendy Doniger, “The Repression of Religious
Studies,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 20 April 2016. http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Repression-of-
Religious/236166?key=dRRz1Bx8HUWt6A96tLgJrHJmdVxUWx3K9p-
DORyC9do5RU16ZW9hc2xDaEo0RExmTDdkLVZEMllCWWpXRUNCQ0o2bFBSMWNsSGpV.
![Page 37: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 36
Digital Humanities
Reflecting trends in the humanities, digital scholarship and research priorities in higher
education, how and the extent to which the digital humanities is emerging as an area of
research activity for religious studies scholars is an important question. In recognition
that “digital humanities” is a broad term that may relate to various aspects of the
research lifecycle in which technology and humanities intersect, the findings on the
digital humanities have been separated out from the other sections of this report.29 As
the project did not specifically recruit interviewees on the basis of their level of
engagement with the digital humanities, the findings capture activity trends and
perceptions of the digital humanities among religious studies scholars more widely.
Five scholars in the sample reported engaging in projects that utilize digital research
methods and all described these projects in the context of the “digital humanities.” The
projects varied in their content and approach, such as using GIS to map shrines to
pulling APIs from online catalogs to develop a distant reading tool.30 The projects were
primarily experimental, overlapped with teaching aims, and were developed in addition
to, as opposed to in lieu of, other scholarly outputs. As a corollary, it was highlighted that
it is challenging to articulate the value of this work during the tenure and promotion
process.
The projects were largely collaborative in nature and engaged a variety of stakeholders
including other scholars, librarians, institutional staff with technological expertise, and
in one case, a software company. One interviewee observed that collaborative research
methods are not traditionally practiced in religious studies as they are in other fields. As
another interviewee explained: “I think that the biggest learning curve for us was our
digital humanities project because it's not the way we're trained. We're trained to work in
a silo, to have our own independent work…and now once you enter the digital
humanities, we didn't know how to code. We didn't know how to build a database.”
Interviewees highlighted that collaboration is essential for the success of these projects
because they rely on disparate skill sets and knowledge, particularly of the technological
variety. For example, one interviewee noted that the success of their project hinged on
29 For further discussion how the digital humanities functions as an over-arching concept, see Brett Bobley’s definition in
Michael Gavin and Kathleen Marie Smith, "An Interview with Brett Bobley," Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by
Matthew K. Gold, University of Minnesota Press, 2012, 61-66
30 Distant reading is a method of literary analysis that relies on collecting and analyzing large quantities of data. For further
information see Franco Moretti, Distant Reading, London: Verso Books, 2013.
![Page 38: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 37
finding the “right people” to work with while overcoming the steep curving of learning to
work with the technology and the digital methods. Another interviewee who
unsuccessfully applied for a grant to do a digital humanities project also suggested that it
was this lack of technological knowledge combined with the inability to find support
which led to difficulties in their application process. Even when good collaborators are
found, however, there is still the barrier of coordination: one interviewee noted the need
for project management support.
Conclusion
Broader conclusions that cut across religious studies scholars’ research experiences
emerge from the findings presented above on discovering and accessing information,
information management, audience, output and credit. Religious studies scholars
develop significant information collections over their course of their careers and these
activities are generally unmediated by their institutions or informational professionals.
They benefit from the affordances of digital technologies but the majority do not engage
with emerging digitally-enabled research methods. While religious studies scholars rely
on resources provided by their institutional libraries the library is not central to their
research processes.
Religious studies scholars develop significant information
collections over their course of their careers and these
activities are generally unmediated by their institutions or
informational professionals.
The Scholar as Collector
In the process of conducting research and developing final outputs, religious studies
scholars amass collections of material produced by others and themselves, in both analog
and digital formats. The variety of formats reflects that scholars’ collections are
developed over the course of their careers. The content ranges from primary materials
reproduced while visiting archives and special collections, or collected while conducting
field work, to secondary content downloaded through institutional access or through
purchase. They also produce and manage information created in the process of analyzing
information and the content they produce towards publishing their final outputs. The
![Page 39: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 38
information may be stored in analog or digital formats and scholars often have
collections of different materials in both formats. Their organizational approaches may
be self-designed or under-designed. They struggle with the best ways to store and
organize information, including when it is appropriate to discard materials.
Religious studies scholars’ collections emerge in part due to necessity, in part due to
preference and in part due to inertia.31 For example, similar to findings from Ithaka
S+R’s history project, scholars who still rely on visiting physical archives now prefer to
use those visits to collect information (e.g. by photographing or scanning documents),
however, these missions are essential for those researching cultures in which the content
can only be found in institutions beyond the West. Similarly, while many scholars
generally continue to purchase at least some of their books, the need to do so is
especially pressing for those who must consult books published beyond the West, often
acquired while in the field.
Although generally not the aims of collecting, some scholars share their collected content
(primarily secondary) with others as part of the larger culture of networking and
informal information sharing among academics. Some are aware that the primary
information collected over the course of their research may be of wider use, particularly
when it pertains to information not widely available in Western institutions. Information
professionals provide a crucial role in helping scholars identify and donate primary
materials.
Digital Research is both Ubiquitous and Marginal
While religious studies is often highlighted as part of the origin of digital humanities and
biblical studies scholars rely heavily on digital software to do their research, these
connections have not translated into widespread adoption of digital methods within the
field.32 Findings from this study were consistent with this trend as only a small minority
of scholars reported engaging with, or even interest in or awareness of, emerging digital
research methods, including those associated with the digital humanities. The relative
31 The preference for amassing personal collections may cut across disciplines. See, for example, Lucy Campbell, "The
Information Seeking Habits of Architecture Faculty," College & Research Libraries (2016):
http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2016/07/27/crl16-930.full.pdf, in which a survey of architecture faculty recently ranked
personal books highly among internet resources, and conversations with peers as important to their research process.
32 Caroline T. Schroeder, "The Digital Humanities as Cultural Capital: Implications for Biblical and Religious Studies," The
Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture 5, no. 1 (2016): 23-24.
![Page 40: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 39
lack of engagement with these methods is consistent with findings from Ithaka S+R’s
previous studies on scholars in history and art history.33
In contrast to religious studies scholars’ still rarefied engagement with new digital
research methods is the ubiquitous use of digital information and tools to facilitate
research processes more widely. Similar to findings from Ithaka S+R’s history project,
digital discovery approaches, often achieved through deceptively simple text box
searching, are pervasive but not generally discussed, reflected upon, or employed
systematically. This taken-for-granted perspective on digitally-enabled research
processes is consistent with Lara Putnam’s characterization of historians’ reliance on text
box searching: “Such practices fall into the realm of invisible method, the black box
where by consensus we leave so much of our discipline’s heavy lifting.” The invisibility of
the common elements of digital research such as text box searching suggests the need for
greater attention to and awareness of research methods facilitated by digital
infrastructures in religious studies and the humanities more widely.
In addition to being largely taken for granted, it is also important to note that many
religious studies scholars experience discomfort and difficulty with digital technologies
as well as lack of awareness of those technologies’ full capabilities. Some do seek out
support from their libraries and other sources of technological support at their
institutions but, when available, they are more likely to rely on graduate student
assistants to take on these tasks or teach them how to use new technologies. Those who
do have awareness of and comfort with digital tools that help the research process do
encourage their usage in their capacity of educating graduate students, however, the lack
of interest in and update of more systematic and explicit digital research methods among
scholars interviews, leads to questions about how this methodological training can be
shared with students.
The Role of the Library in a Crowded Information Landscape
This study is in a unique position to gauge scholars’ relationship to their institutional
libraries because of the project’s U.S.-wide and non-library specific scope. The semi-
structured interview guide used for this study deliberately did not ask explicit questions
about how interviewees perceive or engage with their institution’s libraries to elicit the
fullest understanding of their research activities and needs. The participating research
33 Roger C. Schonfeld and Jenifer Rutner, Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Historians (New York: Ithaka
S+R, 2012), 29-30; Roger C. Schonfeld and Matthew P. Long, Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Art
Historians (New York: Ithaka S+R, 2014), 14-16.
![Page 41: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 40
teams who collected the interviews from scholars at their own institutions were also
instructed to recruit scholars regardless of prior relationship to their institution’s
libraries to gain as wide a perspective as possible.
Apart from a distinct minority of fans, interviewees did not generally place their
institutional libraries at the center of their research activities or needs. Those in the
minority typically had developed relationships with particular librarians who had helped
them with specific tools or projects. In contrast, most described their use of their
institutional libraries in the context of discovery and access of secondary information
and had relatively few complaints about these services in relation to other elements of
their research process and lifecycle. This project did not explore perceptions or
experiences with using libraries towards teaching, however, findings from Ithaka S+R’s
2015 U.S. Faculty Survey and some comments by interviewees in this study suggest the
possibility that religious studies scholars, like scholars in many disciplines, increasingly
see the role of the library in the context of supporting their students and their teaching as
opposed to their own research, which warrants further exploration.34
While religious studies scholars continue to rely on their institutional libraries,
particularly for access to secondary materials, their use of the library is placed among
many other strategies for finding and accessing information. The library website or
specific databases are consulted, however, these resources are typically consulted in
tandem with other entry points such as Google Scholar, Google Books, Academia.edu,
Amazon, general web searching, and reaching out directly to peers.35 Searching multiple
platforms regardless of institutional location is essential for maximizing the possibility
for discovery and access. The physical library is not approached as a site for information
discovery, and peers are just as likely if not more likely to be consulted for research
questions because of their deep subject-specific knowledge and/or because they are
located in institutions with different levels of access to materials.36 Scholars are also as
likely to consult with graduate students or design personal systems for organizing
materials without outside input despite minimal knowledge of best practices for
information preservation. Scholars generally expect that they will rely on a variety of
34 Wolff, Rod and Schonfeld, 68.
35 By highlighting how religious studies scholars typically consult a variety of discovery platforms in tandem, this finding
extends insight from Ithaka S+R’s 2015 Faculty Survey, which found that of four possible starting points for their research,
faculty are just as likely to begin with a general purpose search engine as they are with a specific electronic research
resource/database and almost as likely to begin with their online library website or catalog. See Wolff, Rod and Schonfeld,
12.
36 This finding is consistent with the Ithaka S+R’s 2015 Faculty Survey, which finds that that physical library continues
decline as the site for the possible starting point for research. See Wolff, Rod and Schonfeld, 12.
![Page 42: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 41
institutions for their primary information due to their specialized research pursuits and
they personally collect a variety of primary and secondary materials due to both necessity
and preference over the course of their careers.
Fostering a larger role in religious studies scholars’ research processes beyond resource
procurement and some facilitation of discovery requires very strong initiative from
librarians and the institutional culture more widely. The minority of religious studies
scholars who were aware of and exploring possibilities for donating their personal
collections to libraries and special collections were doing so because those institutions
had reached out to them directly. Religious studies scholars continue to have minimal
awareness of open access and their publishing motivations remain governed by the
benchmarks of tenure and promotion, in which open access is not a priority.37
Recommendations
Discovering and Accessing Information
Support endangered archives. Primary source materials are at risk in archives of
those religious institutions that have a lack of funding or staff expertise. In other
cases, important archives are held in countries where economics pose a challenge to
preservation or access. Collaborative efforts between information and museum
professionals, scholars, scholarly societies, and foundations could help to support
conservation and/or disseminate fragile collections virtually.
Improve collections for areas of religion study and geographic regions. To improve
these collections, which support important and growing areas of study in many of this
study’s participating institutions, cooperative approaches are needed. Some libraries
may wish to explore collaborations that share the capacity of subject specialists with
the necessary language and subject expertise to develop these collections. This would
permit coordinated if not actually shared collections to develop efficiently. In the near
term, institutions might hire visiting consultants to help them build such collections.
Train researchers on digital tools. Digital tools are emerging far faster than
researchers are adapting their practices to take advantage of them. Libraries should
provide more regular and proactive outreach to the researchers they support to raise
awareness of new digital research tools and gain the needed skills and adapt their
workflows to use them effectively.
37 Emily Drabinksi’s account of working on the journal Radical Teacher, which resulted in flipping the journal to an open
access model, provides a compelling example of how librarians can deeply engage with scholars in the area of research
dissemination. See Emily Drabinski, “Flipping to Open Access for Survival: A Librarian’s Critical Role in Transforming a
Journal,” College and Research Libraries News 77, no.10 (2016), 488-491. http://crln.acrl.org/content/77/10/488.long.
![Page 43: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 42
Provide personalized discovery tools. One key tool that is not available through
discovery platforms is a tool that provides recommendations based on peer reading
habits. Interviewees currently rely on Amazon’s recommendations feature to
approximate this kind of function. Ideally, when vendors design these tools they
should pair these improved discovery features with easy access to the texts through
digital previews or full text integration.
Information Management
Train graduate students on information management. Information management
habits, such as citation management, are often formed during graduate study. Many
faculty rely on their graduate students to introduce them to approaches to
information management. Training and ongoing support in technologies and
techniques are needed.
Improve usability of citation management software. Citation management tools
continue to evolve but the majority of scholars do not experience the full benefits of
these improvements by virtue of their design. Lack of migration pathways between
citation management software systems is a barrier to scholars adopting newer
technologies over time. The difficulties learning new technologies prevent scholars
from exploring and adapting available tools for their information management needs.
Develop centralized policies, mechanisms and guidance for storing and preserving
information collected and produced by scholars throughout their research lifecycle.
Who has responsibility for scholars’ information management, storage and
preservation while the information is still in the scholars’ custody is unclear. Taking a
stronger role in these areas is a potential growth opportunity for libraries. Provide
adequate and user-friendly digital storage solutions to remediate scholars’ current
prevalence of de-centralized storage and preservation approaches and develop
programs to help manage their information.
Audience, Output and Credit
Advocate for and create rewards that encourage more widespread adoption of
innovative approaches to research dissemination. Lack of tangible recognition and
reward, most notably through the tenure and promotion and research funding
processes, is a major barrier to scholars producing research outputs beyond peer-
reviewed scholarly articles and books published in primarily via commercial,
university press, society and other traditional publishing venues.
Offer services that promote scholarly engagement with the public. Scholars do not
receive systematic training in how to translate their research into wider public outputs
or how to navigate the complicated terrain of digital media. Scholarly societies
![Page 44: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 43
represent a potential venue to advocate and provide value-added services around
public scholarship for their members.38
Improve institutional repositories’ aims and functions. Scholars’ investment in
institutional repository programs will remain low in the absence of stronger
requirements and rewards for participating and/or improved functionality for the
purposes of research activities. Develop interoperability and improve discovery
mechanisms between institutional repositories and social media platforms for sharing
scholarly work.
Overall
Develop programs and training to support scholars in their capacity as collectors.
Create guidelines and policies for scholars and information professionals to ethically
foster relationships with records creators and custodians of collections in religious
archives and archives beyond Western institutions. Improve and create platforms and
programs for scholars to make the content they collect more widely available to others
and earlier in their careers.
Create training programs and projects that prepare researchers to work
collaboratively. Developing collaborative skills is traditionally perceived as outside
the purview of scholarly training. Collaboration is crucial because digitally innovative
research projects rely on leveraging a variety of expertise and knowledge.
Conduct further research into the research support needs of non-tenured scholars
including independent scholars and adjuncts. Scholars are increasingly conducting
research while not being a part of the tenure system. Understanding their unique
research activities and needs is crucial to designing research support services to
adequately support them.
38 Jessie Daniels and Polly Thistletwaite’s recommendations about the wider need for scholars to receive training in digital
media and the role that scholarly societies can play in this training was informative towards our finding here, see Daniels
and Thistlethwaite, 105-106.
![Page 45: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 44
Appendices
Appendix 1: Participating Research Teams
1. American Theological Library Association: Gillian Harrison Cain, Margot Lyon, John Meeks,
Veronica Simms, Maria Stanton
2. Asbury Seminary: Wesley Custer, Thad Horner, Paul Allen Tippey
3. Baylor University: John G. Bales, John Robinson
4. Brigham Young University: Trevan Hatch, Ryan Lee, Gerrit van Dyk
5. Columbia University Libraries: Nisa Bakkalbasi, Matthew Baker, Beth Bidlack
6. Concordia Theological Seminary: Robert Roethemeyer, Kay Roethemeyer
7. Emory University: Richard Adams, Rebekah Bedard, Sarah Bogue
8. Harvard University: Gloria Korsman, Reed Lowrie
9. Jewish Theological Seminary of America: Ina Cohen, Naomi Steinberger
10. Luther Seminary: Trisha Burr, Andrew Keck
11. Naropa University: Nicholas Weiss
12. Princeton Theological Seminary: Virginia Dearborn, Jenifer Gundry, Kate Skrebutenas
13. Rice University: Elka Tenner, Amanda Thomas
14. Temple University: Justin Hill, Rebecca Lloyd, Fred Rowland, Nancy Turner
15. Tufts University: Chris Strauber
16. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Kathryn Flynn, Jacqueline Solis, Steve Squires,
17. University of Notre Dame: Hye-jin Juhn, Jean McManus
18. Vanderbilt University: Chris Benda, Bill Hook, Michael Kohut, Ramona Romero
19. Yale University: Suzanne Estelle-Homer, Graziano Krätli, Christine Pesch Richardson
![Page 46: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 45
Appendix 2: Participating Institutions: Demographic Characteristics
The table below is designed to briefly capture some key demographic information about
the participating institutions. See Appendix 4 and the participating institutions’
websites for more detailed information about how religious studies is defined and
administered across the participating institutions.
Notes about the table:
At Brigham Young University, religious studies is not offered through a single department or
program but is represented through courses offered across the Faculty of Arts.
The Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary is owned and managed by Columbia
University Libraries and serves many different constituencies, including Union Theological
Seminary, Columbia University, Barnard College, and New York Theological Seminary. Union
Theological Seminary is an independent seminary. Barnard College is an independent
women's liberal arts college which is affiliated with Columbia.
At Jewish Theological Seminary of America, undergraduate students pursue a JTS major in
fields such as Jewish Thought, Midrash, or Jewish Gender and Women’s Studies, while
completing a second major through the liberal arts and science offerings at Columbia
University and/or Barnard College. Jewish studies at the graduate level is offered through
JTS's Gershon Kekst Graduate School.
![Page 47: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 46
Name Standalone seminary
Seminary, theology, or divinity program affiliated with a university
Religious studies offered through a faculty of arts and sciences
Carnegie Class (Basic) Public/Private Status
Asbury Seminary Yes No No Special Focus Four-Year: Faith-Related Institutions
Private not-for-profit
Baylor University No George W. Truett Theological Seminary Yes Doctoral Universities: Higher Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Brigham Young University No No Yes Doctoral Universities: Higher Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Burke Library Yes Union Theological Seminary, Columbia Department of Religion
Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Concordia Theological Seminary Yes No No Special Focus Four-Year: Faith-Related Institutions
Private not-for-profit
Emory University No Candler School of Theology Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Harvard University No Harvard Divinity School Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Jewish Theological Seminary of America
Yes No No Special Focus Four-Year: Faith-Related Institutions
Private not-for-profit
Luther Seminary Yes No No Special Focus Four-Year: Faith-Related Institutions
Private not-for-profit
Naropa University No Master of Divinity Yes Master's Colleges & Universities: Larger Programs
Private not-for-profit
Princeton Theological Seminary Yes No No Special Focus Four-Year: Faith-Related Institutions
Private not-for-profit
Rice University No No Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Temple University No No Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Public
Tufts University No No Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
No No Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Public
University of Notre Dame No Department of Theology Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Vanderbilt University No Vanderbilt Divinity School Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Yale University No Yale Divinity School Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
![Page 48: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 47
Appendix 3: Institutions Included Through Interviews Conducted by the American Theological Library Association
Name Standalone seminary
Seminary, theology, or divinity program affiliated with a university
Religious studies offered through a faculty of arts and sciences
Carnegie Class (Basic) Public/Private Status
Clark Atlanta University No No Yes Doctoral Universities: Higher Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Howard University No School of Divinity No Doctoral Universities: Higher Research Activity
Private not-for-profit
Interdenominational Theological Center
Yes* No No Special Focus Four-Year: Faith-Related Institutions
Private not-for-profit
Spelman College No No Yes Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences Focus
Private not-for-profit
University of Colorado Boulder No No Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Public
University of Oklahoma No No Yes Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity
Public
*The Interdenominational Theological Center is a consortium of six seminaries
![Page 49: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 48
Appendix 4: Participating Institutions: Detailed Descriptions
The following descriptions were provided by the researchers from the participating
teams as a fuller elaboration of the scope of religious studies at their institutions.
Asbury Seminary
In 1923, Henry Clay Morrison began Asbury Theological Seminary with a class of three
students and fashioned a seal for the Seminary which audaciously reads “The Whole
Bible for the Whole World.” Nearly 100 years later, those three students number in the
tens of thousands with a second full campus in Orlando, Florida. Asbury Seminary
graduates flourish in every state, on every continent, in every time zone, reaching the
world through evangelism, missions, church planting, preaching, teaching, and
counseling.
Today, Asbury Theological Seminary is a multi-denominational, evangelical seminary
serving nearly 100 different denominations. Rooted in the Wesleyan tradition with a
strong emphasis on the Bible, spiritual formation and discipleship. As such, Asbury
Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-
filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the
world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the power of the Holy Spirit and to the glory of
God the Father (http://asburyseminary.edu/about/theological-orientation/our-
mission/).
Asbury Seminary is committed to historic Christian faith in the Wesleyan tradition in a
way which is globally engaged, spiritually formative, and missionally alert. Asbury
Seminary’s values and strategic vision include:
1. Asbury Seminary will be committed to serving the global Church.
2. Asbury Seminary will be committed to graduate-level theological education which is faithful
to God’s Word.
3. Asbury Seminary will be committed to personal and community formation.
4. Asbury Seminary will be committed to pursuing a diverse, missionally oriented student body.
5. Asbury Seminary will be committed to lifelong learning for pastors and church leaders.
6. Asbury Seminary will be committed to equipping pastors for missional engagement in service
to the Church.
7. Asbury Seminary will be committed to serving the emerging ethnic churches.
![Page 50: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 49
8. Asbury Seminary will be committed to developing new constituencies.
9. Asbury Seminary will be committed to the laity.
10. Asbury Seminary will be committed to strengthening our economic model and developing our
network of support.
The faculty at Asbury Seminary are engaging instructors, innovative thinkers, rigorous
researchers and accomplished writers. They are committed to seeing students excel
academically, but more importantly they desire to see a maturing of spiritual growth and
formation. The multicultural faculty totals 201 people, including visiting and affiliate
professors, represent eight Protestant denominations, and come from various cultures
and backgrounds, from church planting to graduates of medical school. During any given
year, one-third of them are teaching abroad, making them well prepared to teach
students with a global perspective. The faculty has also helped lead the way in developing
online education. Asbury Seminary was one of the first institutions of its kind to offer
online classes.
Baylor University
Baylor University’s Department of Religion describes itself as a community of faculty,
staff, and students working together to address “issues of religious identity…, formation
for ministry, and preparation for careers in higher education.” The faculty teach courses
in the Old and New Testaments, Church History, and Theology. Programs are offered to
undergraduates to major or minor in Religion, and to graduate students interested in a
deeper academic research approach, the MA and PhD programs are available.
Truett Theological Seminary has a mission to prepare women and men for full-time
Christian ministry, many of whom serve in the Baptist tradition. The Seminary faculty
covers the areas of biblical studies, systematic theology and practical theology in masters’
level programs. While several of the faculty teach in exactly the same areas as the
Religion Department, Truett’ s purpose is focused upon graduate education for the
professional development of pastors, teachers, missionaries and religious leaders
Brigham Young University
We are similar to academic religious studies programs in that we offer courses at BYU in
Israelite history, the Synoptic Gospels, Greek New Testament special topics, biblical (or
near eastern) archaeology, several Ancient Near Eastern studies courses (both history
and “religious studies”), the Bible as literature, etc. etc. However, we do not offer an
undergraduate degree in “religious studies.”
![Page 51: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 50
As for the Religious Education department, we are similar to theological seminaries in
that we offer scripture classes from the perspective of both scholarship and religious
devotion. Moreover, Religious Education offers two master’s degrees: one for LDS
chaplains and one for current Mormon day-school instructors (high school age). Both of
these are similar to an M.T.S. (Master of Theological Studies) offered by most
seminaries.
Columbia University
The Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary is part of the Columbia University
Libraries system. The Burke serves many different constituencies, including Union
Theological Seminary, Columbia University, Barnard College, New York Theological
Seminary.
Union Theological Seminary
Degrees conferred: MA, MDiv, STM, PhD
Brief summary: UTS was founded in 1836 by Presbyterians. It is now
inter/multidenominational and has a growing number of students and faculty from other
religious traditions (e.g., Islam, Judaism, Buddhism) as well as those who identify as
non-religious.
Mission statement: “Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York is a seminary
and a graduate school of theology established in 1836 by founders ‘deeply impressed by
the claims of the world upon the church.’ Union prepares women and men for committed
lives of service to the church, academy, and society. A Union education develops
practices of mind and body that foster intellectual and academic excellence, social
justice, and compassionate wisdom. Grounded in the Christian tradition and responsive
to the needs of God’s creation, Union’s graduates make a difference wherever they serve”
(https://utsnyc.edu/about/mission-vision/).
Columbia University, Department of Religion
Degrees conferred: BA (with religion major), MA, PhD
Brief summary: Founded as King’s College in 1754, Columbia is a private university with
a Department of Religion that undertakes the academic study of religion from a variety
of critical perspectives, including multi-disciplinary approaches.
![Page 52: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 51
“The Department of Religion is committed to the rigorous exploration of the growth and
development of religious traditions, their historical and contemporary influence in
shaping cultures and societies, and their wide-ranging roles in shaping changing global
contexts. Students learn approaches with which they can understand the dynamics
through which religion and religions influence society in far-reaching and far-ranging
ways, from the most intimate relations of religion and the body to the most fraught
relations in geo-political conflicts past and present”
(http://religion.columbia.edu/undergraduate/handbook/introduction).
Barnard College, Department of Religion
Degrees conferred: BA (with religion major and minor)
Brief summary: Founded in 1889, Barnard is a private women’s liberal arts college
affiliated with Columbia University. Barnard has a Department of Religion that
undertakes the academic study of religion (histories, texts, and practices) from a variety
of approaches, including theories regarding race, class, gender, ethnicity, and other
categories of affiliation and identification.
“The Religion department’s curriculum offers students the opportunity to explore the
histories, texts, and practices of many of the world's religious communities and to
consider both the profound ways in which religion has worked historically and how it
continues to inform and affect the cultural, political, and ethical debates of the current
moment. In addition, our classes invite students to reflect on the vexing theoretical
questions that are generated by the category "religion" itself, an abstract category that
has its own complicated history. The academic study of religion is self-consciously
interdisciplinary, drawing upon the methods and insights of literary studies,
historiography, social analysis, and cultural comparison. Moreover, the study of religion
reminds us that religious identities demand sustained critical analysis, intersecting
complexly as they do with race, class, gender, and ethnicity, among other categories of
affiliation and identification. In its teaching, research projects, and public programming,
the Religion department promotes engaged intellectual inquiry into the rich diversity of
religious institutions, rituals, ideas, and communities both past and present”
(https://religion.barnard.edu).
Concordia Theological Seminary
The nature of research being done at Concordia Theological Seminary Fort Wayne
(CTSFW) is reflective of our identity as a seminary of the Lutheran Church Missouri
Synod. Our interviewees represent a sampling of one-third of our faculty across the four
![Page 53: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 52
theological departments of our campus (Historical, Exegetical, Pastoral Ministry and
Missions, and Systematic). The research supports teaching in the seminary as well as
works for the Church, from narrative histories and biographies, to commentaries on
books of the Bible, to contributions to confessional Lutheran dogmatics. The methods
used are primarily historical, textual, grammatical, lexical, normative, constructive, and
confessional.
Our Faculty identify clearly with our Vision: "CTSFW is a vibrant, Christ-centered
theological community that engages and resources the church and world, domestically
and internationally, with distinctively Lutheran teaching, practice and worship."
CTSFW degree programs include Master of Divinity, Master of Arts in Deaconess
Studies, Master of Arts, Master of Sacred Theology, Doctor of Ministry, and Doctor of
Philosophy (Missiology).
Emory University
Emory University notes in its mission statement
(http://president.emory.edu/university_leadership/university_mission.html) the
importance of the study of religion. The primary departments for the study of religion
are the Undergraduate Department of Religion (http://religion.emory.edu), the Candler
School of Theology (http://candler.emory.edu), and the Graduate Division of Religion
(http://gdr.emory.edu). Religion courses are not required of Emory undergraduates, but
courses do count for many general education requirements, and the department is
popular for majors and non-majors. The Undergraduate Department has courses in
theoretical approaches to religion as well as the practices and traditions of most major
faiths, with robust offerings in Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism.
Candler School of Theology is one of thirteen seminaries of The United Methodist
Church. Alongside this affiliation, the faculty and staff represent a broad range of
religious traditions, though almost exclusively within Christianity. Candler offers six
single degrees and ten joint degree programs with law, business, public health,
international development, bioethics, and social work. Most of the students at Candler
pursue the Master of Divinity degree, with most moving into parish ministry after
graduation. The curriculum and faculty of the school are divided into four, roughly
equal-in-size, areas: Biblical Studies, History and Interpretation of Christianity,
Christianity and Culture, and Church and Ministry.
The Graduate Division of Religion is a unit of Emory’s Laney Graduate School and
comprises more than 90 Emory faculty, drawn from areas of the university such as the
![Page 54: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 53
School of Theology, the School of Law, the Department of Religion, and the Tam
Institute for Jewish Studies. The GDR grants PhDs only, and in the following nine areas:
American Religious Cultures; Ethics and Society; Hebrew Bible; Historical Studies in
Theology and Religion; Jewish Religious Cultures; New Testament; Person, Community,
and Religious Life; Theological Studies; and West and South Asian Religions.
There are also several interdisciplinary programs that connect to the study of religion at
Emory. These include the Center for the Study of Law and Religion
(http://law.emory.edu/cslr), the Emory Center for Ethics
(http://www.ethics.emory.edu), and the Tam Institute for Jewish Studies
(http://www.js.emory.edu), among others.
Harvard University
Founded in 1636, Harvard's concern with religion is as old as the college itself. College
founders hoped the school would advance learning so as not "to leave an illiterate
ministry to the churches" in succeeding generations. The oldest professorship at Harvard
is the Hollis Professor of Divinity, dating from 1721. From the earliest days of the
college, through the 18th century, graduates who aspired to ministry would apprentice
themselves to an experienced practitioner.
The first formal graduate program at Harvard University for ministers was begun in
1811. In 1816, Harvard Divinity School (HDS) was founded -- with the support of leaders
in the nascent American Unitarian movement -- as a nonsectarian theological school. In
the 19thc century that meant the student body included Protestant Christians of several
traditions. In the 21st century, the faculty and student body represent about 30 different
faiths and Christian denominations, as well as many nationalities.
The tradition of professional ministerial education continues in the Divinity School
through the M.Div. degree, and the school offers three additional graduate degree
programs: M.T.S. and Th.M., and Ph.D. The doctoral program is offered jointly with the
Committee on the Study of Religion in Harvard University’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Instructors in the Committee on the Study of Religion are drawn equally from the Arts
and Sciences faculty and the Divinity faculty. In addition to overseeing joint Ph.D.
program with HDS, the Committee also administers the undergraduate program in
religion. Diverse departments are represented on the Committee, and students may find
themselves working with professors in very different fields during their program of
study.
![Page 55: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 54
All ten faculty in our sample have standing in the Committee on the Study of Religion.
Of these, all but one professor has a primary appointment at the Divinity School.
Jewish Theological Seminary of America
The Jewish Theological Seminary (JTS) was founded in 1886 through the efforts of two
distinguished rabbis, Dr. Sabato Morais and Dr. H. Pereira Mendes, along with a group
of prominent lay leaders from Sephardic congregations in Philadelphia and New York.
Its mission was to preserve the knowledge and practice of historical Judaism. In 1887,
JTS held its first class of ten students in the vestry of the Spanish-Portuguese Synagogue,
New York City's oldest congregation.
Since then, JTS has greatly expanded its mission, creating a beautiful campus and
evolving into the prestigious center of Jewish learning it is today. A Jewish university
with a world-class faculty and a diverse student body, JTS grants undergraduate,
graduate, and professional degrees through its five schools and offers enriching
programs for the Jewish community in the United States, Israel, and around the world.
JTS schools include the Gershon Kekst Graduate School; The Rabbinical School; H. L.
Miller Cantorial School and College of Jewish Music; William Davidson Graduate School
of Jewish Education; and Albert A. List College of Jewish Studies..
The Gershon Kekst Graduate School offers the most extensive academic program in
advanced Jewish studies in North America. The Kekst Graduate School awards master’s
and doctoral degrees in numerous areas of specialization, ranging from Ancient Judaism
to Modern Jewish Studies and from Jewish Gender and Women’s Studies to Jewish
Ethics. Students delve deeply into their chosen areas of focus while acquiring broad-
based knowledge of the Jewish experience.
At The Rabbinical School we train the head, the heart, and the hands. We are a
modern yeshiva, offering intensive study of classical texts in an egalitarian setting. We
are a university with world-class scholars devoted to critical inquiry. And we are a
cutting-edge professional school, training students to be transformative Jewish leaders.
Cantors bring meaning and beauty to worship and punctuate the life cycle through
music. H. L. Miller Cantorial School and College of Jewish Music is the single
most comprehensive accredited program in Jewish liturgy and nusah (the musical
modes and melodies by which the liturgy is expressed) available in North America. Our
deep training in Jewish music is complemented by innovative approaches to prayer,
![Page 56: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 55
spiritual leadership, and education that prepare students to shape joyful and soulful
Jewish communities.
The William Davidson Graduate School of Jewish Education trains the leaders
who will shape the lives and communities of the Jewish people for decades to come. The
Davidson School is the largest pluralistic school of Jewish education in North America.
For over a century, we have graduated leaders who go on to define the field of Jewish
education and shape Jewish experience in schools, start-ups, congregations, nonprofits,
and beyond.
Students at List College pursue a rigorous, synergistic, and rewarding curriculum in
Jewish studies at JTS, and in the liberal arts and sciences at either Columbia University
or Barnard College. Each List College student pursues a comprehensive core curriculum
in Jewish Studies, and chooses a major field in which to specialize. Majors can range
from Bible to Modern Jewish Studies, and from Jewish Ethics to Midrash.
Luther Seminary
Religious studies at Luther Seminary is focused on preparing leaders to serve in
Christian communities. Full-time faculty have deep engagements within particular
Christian traditions (particularly Lutheranism) and many are ordained clergy in those
traditions. While focused on the Christian tradition, the Seminary encourages
engagement with interfaith settings as well as practitioners and scholars from other
faiths. Luther Seminary offers the following degrees: Master of Divinity, Master of Arts
in Children, Youth, and Family Ministry, Master of Arts in Christian Ministry, Master of
Arts in Leadership and Innovation for Ministry, Master of Arts (Academic), Master of
Arts (Studies in Lutheran Ministries), Master of Theology, Doctor of Philosophy, and
Doctor of Ministry.
The scholarship and teaching scope of the faculty is organized around Bible, history,
theology, and leadership. Faculty make use of broader methodologies and various
cognate disciplines such as philosophy, sociology, cultural studies, history, political
science, law, rhetoric, anthropology, etc. In addition to writing for other scholars, many
faculty strive to translate their scholarship in ways accessible to clergy, lay persons, and
the general public through blogs, websites, journalistic venues, and localized
presentations.
![Page 57: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 56
Naropa University
At Naropa University the study of religion falls into the Department of World Wisdom
Traditions, which contains both religion and traditional Eastern arts. On the
undergraduate level students study contemplative religious traditions utilizing the
Religionswissenschaft methodology and study most major religious traditions
(Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Taoism, and Hinduism) in a non-comparative
manner.
On the graduate level, there are several option of focus. There is an option to study
Contemplative religions similar to the undergraduate program. However, the majority of
graduate students major in Indo-Tibetan Buddhist studies. Within the Buddhist studies
program, one can choose one of two tracks: History of Religions, which follows the
Religionswissenschaft methodology, or Tibetan Traditions, which utilizes a pedagogical
method similar to a shedra, which is the Tibetan monastic educational system. The two
tracks overlap for some courses and are distinct in others. Finally, Naropa University
also offers a Master of Divinity degree. Students working on an MDiv have the option to
focus as well; they can choose to focus on contemplative religions or focus on the Tibetan
Traditions method. The option to add a language concentration in Sanskrit or Tibetan is
also available to all graduate programs.
Princeton Theological Seminary
Princeton Theological Seminary prepares women and men to serve Jesus Christ in
ministries marked by faith, integrity, scholarship, competence, compassion, and joy,
equipping them for leadership worldwide in congregations and the larger church, in
classrooms and the academy, and in the public arena. A professional and graduate school
of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A), the Seminary stands within the Reformed tradition,
affirming the sovereignty of the triune God over all creation, the Gospel of Jesus Christ
as God’s saving word for all people, the renewing power of the word and Spirit in all of
life, and the unity of Christ’s servant church throughout the world. This tradition shapes
the instruction, research, practical training, and continuing education provided by the
Seminary, as well as the theological scholarship it promotes.
In response to Christ’s call for the unity of the church, the Seminary embraces in its life
and work a rich racial and ethnic diversity and the breadth of communions represented
in the worldwide church. In response to the transforming work of the Holy Spirit, the
Seminary offers its theological scholarship in service to God’s renewal of the church’s life
and mission. In response to God’s sovereign claim over all creation, the Seminary seeks
![Page 58: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 57
to engage Christian faith with intellectual, political, and economic life in pursuit of truth,
justice, compassion, and peace.
Rice University
Rice University’s Department of Religion consists of 13 full-time faculty, one adjunct
professor, and four affiliated faculty (Professors of Anthropology, Philosophy and
Sociology). The department has a broad range of research interests and teaching topics,
including (but not limited to) African and African American religions, Buddhism and
Buddhist thought, ancient and modern Judaism and Christianity, colonial and modern
Hinduism, religion and psychology, and modern American religions. There seems to
be a special emphasis on the more uncommon or unknown aspects of many
religions within the department, with studies in apocrypha, mysticism and
gnosticism being quite common among faculty. The methods used by members of the
department are historical, literary, philosophical and social-scientific in nature.
The department offers a certificate program in Gnosticism, Esotericism, and
Mysticism (GEM) which provides students with a theoretical framework in the often
marginalized, more esoteric elements of religion. The goal is to include diverse voices
from religious traditions, as opposed to focusing on orthodox traditions. There is also
an interdisciplinary program at Rice in the Study of African American
Religions, which brings together faculty from the departments of Religion, History,
Sociology and English that are concerned with the impact and development of African
American Religion in the United States. The program has a very broad focus and there
are about 11 graduate students affiliated with this program.
The Religion department is housed in the Humanities building on campus, along with
the Philosophy and History departments. The department also hosts the Religious
Studies Review (RSR), a publication for short reviews and longer review essays for most
religious studies publications. There are undergraduate and graduate degrees in Religion
available at Rice, with 38 current graduate students. While there are some junior faculty
members, the majority are more senior and have been at Rice University for quite some
time.
Temple University
The Temple Religion Department was established in 1961, having grown out of a
previous school of theology in the Baptist tradition. From its beginning the department
has been unaffiliated with any particular faith, developing deep roots in interreligious
dialogue and interdisciplinary methods in the study of religion. An early focus on the
![Page 59: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 58
three monotheistic religions - Christianity, Judaism, and Islam - soon broadened to
include non-Western religions and more general religious studies topics such as the
death and dying awareness movement, sports and religion, and gender and religion.
Today the Temple University Religion Department includes scholars specializing in
Islam, early Christianity, Biblical studies, American Judaism, Japanese, Chinese, and
Tibetan Buddhism, Afro-Caribbean religions, and the intersection of religion and secular
society.
With 19 tenured, tenure-track, and non-tenure track faculty, the Temple Religion
Department offers the B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. degrees. Undergraduates can also minor in
religion or Jewish studies. The department maintains close ties with religious
institutions of varying faith traditions, both locally and globally. The faculty are actively
engaged in research and annually produce many articles and books in addition to
maintaining a busy teaching schedule. The 2015 Student Profile listed the Religion
Department as having 17 undergraduate majors and 54 graduate students. Despite the
low number of undergraduate majors, the department reaches a very large number of
students through the University’s general education program. Since 2005, the Religion
Department has awarded over 30 Ph.D. degrees.
Tufts University
Tufts University’s Department of Religion, part of the School of Arts and Sciences,
consists of five tenured faculty and two senior lecturers. The department does not offer
graduate degrees. Arts and Sciences undergraduates can major or minor in Religion.
School of Engineering undergraduates can minor in Religion.
The department was until a few years ago the Department of Comparative Religion. As
such, the representation of global issues and non-Christian traditions is strong. Faculty
have scholarly and teaching interests in Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, early Christianity,
and American religious history. They actively contribute to programs in the Consortium
of Studies in Race, Colonialism, and Diaspora at Tufts (which includes Africana Studies,
American Studies, Asian American Studies, US Latino Studies, and Colonialism Studies).
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Founded in 1946, the UNC Department of Religious Studies was one of the first to be
created in a state university. In that year, James A. Gray, president of R. J. Reynolds,
endowed a professorship in biblical literature out of a desire to impart “the fundamentals
of the Bible” to undergraduates. Popular scholar and teacher Bernard Boyd filled this
![Page 60: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 59
chair from 1950 to the early 1970s. Around the same time, philosopher-sociologist
Arnold Nash was hired to chair the fledgling department.
The department expanded in the 1960s and 1970s, bringing on new faculty who
represented a growing array of interests within religious studies. These included the
ancient Near East, medieval studies, religion and literature, philosophy of religion,
psychology of religion, Buddhism, Hinduism, and African religions. At this stage, the
department was devoted primarily to undergraduate instruction, an area in which the
department has continued to excel. An M.A. program was created in 1978 and a Ph.D.
program in 1985.
At present, the faculty conduct research and teach courses in a number of religious
traditions, including Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Buddhism. They analyze religious
life from the ancient and modern world, from ancient Sumer to present-day Iran, from
early modern Europe to 21st-century India, from medieval Japan to contemporary
America. They are trained in an enormous variety of scholarly methods, including
textual studies and literary theory, history, ethnography and other social sciences, law,
philosophy and theology, archaeology, and critical cultural theory. With this breadth of
training, our faculty is equipped to offer students a range of skills that are invaluable for
the exploration of human history and culture.
Today, the UNC Department of Religious Studies is dedicated to the study of religions as
historical and cultural phenomena. It takes an interdisciplinary approach to
understanding religious traditions from around the world: their history, sacred texts,
beliefs, rituals, and institutions.
Because religious pluralism plays an important role in teaching the value of diversity, the
Department is committed to bringing a broad range of perspectives into the study of
religion. UNC offers B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. programs in Religious Studies; undergraduate
minors in Religious Studies, Christianity and Culture, Islamic and Middle Eastern
Studies, and Jewish Studies; an honors program for undergraduate majors; as well as
frequent public lectures and continuing education seminars that advance the academic
study of religion. Students receive training that equips them for an enormous variety of
careers—in law, medicine, teaching, business, social service, journalism, politics, the
arts, and more.
Courses having religious studies themes are taught in many other curricula of the
University, including the Departments of Classics, Anthropology, History, Philosophy,
Sociology, Social Medicine, and Germanic and Slavic Languages, and many of the faculty
teaching these are also named affiliated faculty in the Dept. of Religious Studies.
![Page 61: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 60
There are also two independent study centers:
The Carolina Center for the Study of the Middle East and Muslim Civilizations,
promoting understanding of the Middle East through teaching, research, and community
outreach.
The Carolina Center for Jewish Studies, an academic program more integrated into the
liberal arts than many Jewish Studies programs created at peer institutions. Jewish
Studies is a highly interdisciplinary field that concerns itself with the history, culture,
and religious traditions of Jews in their interactions with others from the ancient period
to the present. It draws faculty strength from religious studies, history, languages and
literatures, archaeology, political science and other disciplines in the humanities and
social sciences.
University of Notre Dame
The University of Notre Dame carries the reputation for being an excellent place to do
religion because of the freedom the institution affords and protects to explore all aspects
of religion. The core of the study of religion resides in the mission statements of the
University and the large Department of Theology, and is reflected in areas of faculty and
research strength in theology, religious history, religion and literature, religion and
politics, and sociology of religion. In addition to these disciplinary strengths, multiple
interdisciplinary centers and colloquia deal broadly with religion, drawing heavily on
history, sociology, political science, Asian studies, and of course theology. Strong
graduate programs exist in all these disciplines, and the centers and colloquia provide
graduate students and faculty a rich intellectual environment.
Vanderbilt University
Scholars of religion at Vanderbilt are dispersed across multiple departments and schools.
The majority are shared between the Divinity School and the School for Arts & Sciences.
Needless to say, all faculty connected with the Divinity School work on religion to some
extent, specifically in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Within the School for Arts &
Sciences, faculty members working on religion are concentrated in the Department for
Religious Studies, but can also be found in the History Department and the Asian
Studies Program. This latter group of scholars works within other religious traditions,
specifically Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism.
There are two, separate, graduate programs concerning religion. The first is housed in
the Divinity School. It is interdenominational and focuses on training ministers. The
![Page 62: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 61
Divinity School offers professional degrees in Master of Divinity and Master of
Theological Studies. A separate graduate program exists as a division of the Graduate
School, known as the Graduate Department of Religion. It offers an M.A. and Ph.D. in
Religion. Fields of Study included in the GDR include Critical Studies in Asian, Islamic
and Jewish Traditions; Ethics and Society; Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel; Historical
Studies; Homiletics and Liturgics; Jewish Studies (M.A.); New Testament and Early
Christianity; Religion, Psychology and Culture; and Theological Studies. Courses offered
in the Graduate Department of Religion are taught by faculty in the Divinity School, the
School for Arts & Sciences, the Law School and the Medical School, though the majority
of these faculty are affiliated with the first two schools, as noted above. All scholars we
interviewed were faculty in the GDR program.
Yale University
There are two major loci of study and research in Religious Studies at Yale University:
the Divinity School and the Department of Religious Studies. Each views itself as having
a very distinct role, the former as a professional school that “encourages scholarly
engagement with Christian traditions in a global, multi-faith context”39 and the latter as
a research-oriented, Ph.D.-granting department within the Faculty of Arts and Sciences,
dedicated to the study of religion worldwide.
Although the two academic units are careful to differentiate themselves, in effect, many
tenured Divinity School professors are granted a secondary appointment in religious
studies that entitles them to advise and train graduate students. There is an element of
prestige in having an appointment in the Department of Religious Studies (or other
“academic” departments such as history, art history or American studies) even though all
Yale faculty go through the same exacting promotion and tenure review process. All of
the scholars who participated in our study were associated with either the Divinity
School, the Department of Religious Studies, or hold appointments in both.
39 ”Yale Divinity School Mission Statement,” Yale Divinity School, http://divinity.yale.edu/about-yds/strategic-
plan/bridging-faith-traditions.
![Page 63: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 62
Appendix 5: Local Reports
While all participating institutions created reports based on the data and analysis
conducted locally, the participants were given the option whether or not to disseminate
their reports publicly. The following reports are publicly available:
Adams, R., Bedard, R., and Bogue, S. “Pitts Theology Library Local Report.” Emory
University, 2016, http://pitts.emory.edu/ithaka2016.
Bales, J. and Bales, R. “Ithaka S+R Religious Studies Project: Report of Interviews of
Religion Faculty at Baylor University.” Baylor University, November 1, 2016,
http://hdl.handle.net/2104/9882.
Bidlack, B., Baker, M.C., and Bakkalbasi, N. “Is There Anything New under the Sun?
(Ecclesiastes 1:9): A Local Report on the Research Practices of Scholars in Religion and
Theology.” Columbia University Academic Commons, 2016,
http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/D8668DKK.
Burr, T. and Keck, A. "Faculty Research Practices at Luther Seminary." Luther Seminary,
2016, http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/staff_pubs/1.
Cohen, I. and Steinberger, N. “Report to Ithaka Religious Studies Project.” Jewish
Theological Seminary of America, November 2016,
http://garfield.jtsa.edu:1801/view/action/singleViewer.do?dvs=1481045442663~220&l
ocale=en_US&VIEWER_URL=/view/action/singleViewer.do?&DELIVERY_RULE_ID=
10&frameId=1&usePid1=true&usePid2=true.
Dearborn, V., Gundry, J., and Skrebutenas, K. The Research Practices and Support
Needs of Advanced Scholars in Religion and Theology: A Local Report by Princeton
Theological Seminary Library.” Princeton Theological Seminary, 2016,
https://library.ptsem.edu/assessment/ithaka-2016.
Estelle-Homer, S., Krätli, G., and Richardson, C. “A Study of Faculty Research Practices
in Religious Studies at Yale University.” Yale University, November 1, 2016,
https://works.bepress.com/suzanne_estelle-holmer/1/.
Hatch, T., Lee, R., and van Dyk, G. "Research Support Services for Religious Studies"
Brigham Young University, 2016, http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/1745.
![Page 64: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 63
Hill, J. Lloyd, R., Rowland, F., and Turner, N. “Final Report: Religious Studies
Scholarship at Temple University.” Temple University, 2016,
https://sites.temple.edu/assessment/files/2017/01/TempleUniversity_ReligiousStudies
_FinalReport.pdf.
Kohut, M., Benda, C., Romero, R., Hook, B. “Research Support Services: Religious
Studies.” Vanderbilt University, 2016, http://hdl.handle.net/1803/8369.
Strauber, C. “Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Religious Studies Scholars
at Tufts.” Tufts University, 2016, http://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tufts:sd.0000506.
Korsman, G. and Lowrie, R. “The Research Practices of Faculty in Religious Studies:
A Local Report by Harvard Library Fall 2016.” Harvard University, 2016,
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29503806.
Thomas, A., Tenner, E. "Research Support Services Department of Religion Rice
University (Ithaka S+R Local Report)." Rice University, 2016,
https://scholarship.rice.edu/handle/1911/92705.
Tippey, P.A., Horner, T., and Custer, W. "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of
Religious Studies Research's.” Asbury Seminary, 2016,
http://place.asburyseminary.edu/firstfruitspapers/70.
![Page 65: REPORT Supporting the Changing Research Practices of ... · Ithaka S+R’s Research Support Services Program is a series of projects that investigate the research support needs of](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022071022/5fd6652ea4bef21e5607ae4c/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
SUPPORTING THE CHANGING RESEARCH PRACTICES OF RELGIOUS STUDIES SCHOLARS 64
Appendix 6: Interview Guide
1. Describe your current research focus.
2. Describe how your research is situated within the academy. [Probe for how they position
themselves in relation to religious studies and theology studies and if they see their work as
connecting to any other disciplines]
3. What theoretical approaches does your research utilize or rely on?
4. What research methods do you currently use to conduct your research [e.g. discourse
analysis, historical analysis, etc.]?
5. Does your research produce data? If so, what kinds of data does your research typically
produce? How and where do you currently keep this data? Where do plan to store this data in
the long term? [Prompt: e.g. an archives, an online repository)
6. [Beyond data you produce yourself] What kinds of sources does your research depend on?
How do you locate these materials?
7. Think back to a past or ongoing research project where you faced challenges in the process of
conducting the research. Describe these challenges. What could have been done to mitigate
these challenges?
8. How do you keep up with trends in your field more broadly?
9. If I gave you a magic wand that could help you with your research process – what would you
ask it to do? [If they cite broader issues, e.g. lack of time or funding, probe further for coping
strategies or workarounds they use to mitigate these challenges when conducting their
research]
10. Where do you typically publish your research in scholarly settings? [Probe for kinds of
publications and the disciplines these publications are aligned with] Beyond scholarly
publishing are there any other venues that you disseminate your research? [Probe: e.g. blogs,
popular press, classes]
11. How do your publishing practices relate to those typical to your discipline?
12. Have you ever published your research in open access venues such as open access online
journals or repositories? If so, which journals or repositories and what has been your
motivations for doing so? (e.g. required, for sharing, investment in open access principles). If
no, why not?
13. From your perspective what are the greatest challenges and opportunities currently facing
religious studies and/or theology studies?
14. Is there anything else about your research support needs that you think it is important for me
that was not covered in the previous questions?