alcts forum response to ithaka

11
We Should Worry My Concerns with the results of the Ithaka S + R 2010 Library Survey ALCTS Forum, June 27, 2011 ALA Annual Conference JENICA P. ROGER DIRECTOR OF LIBRARIES, SUNY POTSDA

Upload: jenica-rogers

Post on 22-May-2015

962 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

We Should Worry

My Concerns with the results of the Ithaka S + R

2010 Library Survey

ALCTS Forum, June 27, 2011ALA Annual Conference

JENICA P. ROGERSDIRECTOR OF LIBRARIES, SUNY POTSDAM

Page 2: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

65% of respondents do not feel that their library has a well-developed strategy to meet changing user needs and research habits.

Answer: NO one, but without a plan, there’s no reason NOT to do it

Question: Who thought this was a good idea?

Page 3: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

Leadership is crucial.Follow-up Questions: • How many library directors are doing “some”, if not “enough”, planning?• How many library directors want to do strategic planning but don’t feel equipped or supported to do it?• How do the answers from this 65% inflect the results of the rest of the survey?

Page 4: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

63% of Library Directors don’t feel they have enough information to deaccession print journals available online.

How much MORE information do you need?

OR, COULD IT BE POSSIBLE THAT YOU’RE TOTALLY OVERENGINEERING THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION?

Page 5: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

Print journals are dead tech.Follow-up Questions:• Are universities and colleges responding differently to this question?• Do the libraries holding tightly to print holdings have a mission that makes that a critical choice?• What local circumstance makes print more important than space?

Page 6: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

Nearly 100% of Library Directors

indicated that “Supporting faculty

instruction and student learning” is

a priority in their libraries ...

... but only 40-65% indicated that “working with instructional

technologists…” and “working with faculty to

incorporate digital information resources into their curricula”

were also high priorities.

WE ARE NOT MAKING SENSE:

Page 7: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

Collaborate or Die.Follow-up Questions:• How much does institutional politics - and faculty perceptions highlighted in the 2009 study - inflect these responses?• Do librarians have the skills to be effective partners with faculty in this arena?• Would a strong supporting leadership voice make a difference?

Page 8: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

75% of Library Directors still think it’s very important that libraries be “gateway”s for information access.

Not only did that ship sail, but then it sunk in the harbor. Get a new ship.

Page 9: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

Seriously. We need a new ship.Follow-up Questions:• When will we begin focusing on sustainably leveraging our collections and metadata?• What skills, training, and knowledge do we need to get there?• What myths are we holding onto that keep us focused on portals and gateways?

Page 10: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

This is not my vision of the future(I would like a future that makes some sort of logical sense)

Page 11: ALCTS Forum response to Ithaka

We deserve better.What will it take to get us there?What new questions do we need to ask?What skills do our decision-makers need?What knowledge? What attitudes?