report on the professional development training … · 2019-07-30 · the 5 day programme at iim...
TRANSCRIPT
1
REPORT
on the
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRAINING PROGRAMME FOR FACULTY & ADMINISTRATORS
OF PROJECT INSTITUTIONS
TECHNICAL EDUCATION QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME – III (TEQIP – III)
(Under the aegis of the National Project Implementation Unit, Ministry of Human Resource Development,
Government of India)
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT VISAKHAPATNAM
15 – 19 JULY 2019
2
INDEX
Topic Page No. Programme Summary 3 Programme Schedule 4 Brief Report on the Programme 5 Feedback from the Participants 7 Training Assessment with Recommendations 10 Glimpses from the Programme (Photos) 12 Appendices 17-24 List of Participants 17 Attendance Sheets 20
3
Programme Summary Programme Title: Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme – III (TEQIP – III) Professional Development Training Programme for Faculty & Administrators of Project Institutions Sponsor: National Project Implementation Unit, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India Organiser: Indian Institute of Management Visakhapatnam Venue: IIM Visakhapatnam campus, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam Dates: 15 – 19 July 2019 Duration: 5 days Number of Participants: 37 Number of Resource Persons: 10 Programme Director: Prof. Bishakha Majumdar Programme Co-Director: Prof. Anupama Sharma
4
Programme Schedule
Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme – III (TEQIP – III) Professional Development Training Programme for Faculty & Administrators of Project Institutions
(Under the aegis of the National Project Implementation Unit, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India)
Venue: Class-Room: LT-1, IIM Visakhapatnam Days Session-1 Session-2 Session-3 Session(s): 4-5
0830-0930 Hrs. 0930-1030 Hrs. 1100-1200 Hrs. 1400-1500 Hrs.
1500-1630 Hrs. 1635-1650 Hrs.
July 15 (Mon)
Inauguration
Aligning Teaching to
Learning Outcomes: Teachers in Leadership
Roles
Industry-Academia Connect: Curricula
Development, Talent-supply &
Capacity-building
Accreditation in Academic
Institutions
Briefing on Administrative Arrangements
Faculty
Chief Guest: Shri Prasad Dahapute
Member (BoG), IIMV
Prof. Subir Verma
Prof. Subir Verma
Prof. Subir Verma
Mr. Kaleem V Khan, Sr. Admin
Officer & Mr. Kamal Keerthi,
Asst. Manager (IT)
July 16 (Tue)
Developing Teaching Styles
Case-based Teaching
Experiential Exercises
Time Management: Best Practices
from the Academia
Faculty Prof. Vinay Ramani
Prof. Anupama Sharma
Prof. Anupama Sharma
Prof. Bishakha Majumdar
July 17 (Wed)
Project Management
Decision-Making using Spreadsheets
Making Students Employment-
Ready
Stress Management:
Managing Physical &
Psychological Stress for Work-
Life Balance
Faculty Prof. B Srirangacharyulu
Prof. B Srirangacharyulu
Prof. Bishakha Majumdar
Prof. Bishakha Majumdar
July 18 (Thu)
Strategizing for World-class Campuses
Trends in Technical Education
Networking and Mentoring in
Academic Institutions
Financial Management in Academic Institutions
Leadership for Realising
Institutional Vision & Mission
Faculty Prof. Amit B Chakrabarti
Prof. G Srinivasan
Prof. G. Srinivasan
Prof. Deepika R
Gupta
Prof. M. Chandrasekhar
July 19 (Fri)
Research in Academia:
Sponsorship and
Management
Consultancy in Academia: Skills and
Techniques
1100-1230 Hrs. ICT-enabled
Pedagogy
1400-1430 Hrs.
Feedback
1430-1600 Hrs. Summarizing &
Valedictory; Presentation of
Certificates
Faculty Prof. Ganesh Prabhu
Prof. Ganesh Prabhu
Prof. Ganesh Prabhu Participants
Chief Guest: Dr. OR Nandagopan, Director, NSTL,
DRDO
Notes: • Coffee/Tea Break: • Lunch (Mon-Wed: 15/7 -
17/7/2019): • Lunch (Thurs: 18/7/2019): • Lunch (Fri: 19/7/2019):
1030-1100 Hrs. & 1630-1645 Hrs. 1215-1445 Hrs. (in the Hotel) 1215-1345 Hrs. (in the Hotel) 1230-1400 Hrs. (on Campus)
• Photos during Inauguration: • Group Photo (15/7/2019): • Photos during Valedictory
(19/7/2019):
0830-0930 Hrs. 0930-0940 Hrs. 1430-1600 Hrs.
• Exposure Visits / Sight-seeing:
1630 Hrs. onwards (daily) • Farewell Dinner (18/7/2019) in the Hotel:
1930-2130 Hrs.
o0o
5
Brief Report on the Programme TEQIP III
The Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme (TEQIP) was implemented by the Government of India in 2002 as a World Bank assisted Project to improve the quality of technical education system in the country. Currently in its third phase, the TEQIP is run by the National Project Implementation Unit (NPIU), Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, with an aim to make engineering education holistic and responsive to changes in the environment.
TEQIP Phase III was launched to improve the competence in teaching, learning, and research in the government and government-aided AICTE approved engineering institutions and engineering departments of centrally funded Universities and Deemed to be Universities of India. The goal of the TEQIP III encompasses having multi-pronged improvement in faculty productivity and motivation and student learning and employability. The Present Programme
The objective of the five-day Professional Development Training Programme at Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Visakhapatnam was to create the needed capacities under TEQIP-III in technical education policy planners and administrators towards gaining greater appreciation for governance, institutional and policy reforms, as well as the management principles, precepts and practices, so that they are able to fulfil the role-responsibilities envisaged of them as mentors, facilitators and champions of change, with competence and confidence. The training aimed to facilitate networking and knowledge-sharing among the participants and the resource persons, provide insights into effective academic practices, and afford exposure to the latest developments in the academic, professional, and socio-economic contexts, in order to empower the participants to transfer the benefits in turn to their key stakeholders – the students, the community, and to the nation. Participant Profile
The 5 Day Programme at IIM Visakhapatnam saw participation from 37 professionals from premier engineering institutions across India, such as NIT Trichy, NIT Uttarakhand, IIIT Guwahati, and Delhi Technical University, among others (List of Participants in Appendix 1). The list of attendees included profiles such as Deans, Professors, Associate Professors, and Assistant Professors from various streams such as Chemical Engineering, CSE, Chemistry, and Humanities and Social Sciences. Together, the participants represented 13 states of India, namely Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Maharashtra, Odisha, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh. Brief Account of the Training Activities
On Day 1, the Inaugural Address was delivered by Mr. Prasad Dahapute, Managing Director, Varhad Capital Private Limited, and Hon. Member, Board of Governors, IIM Visakhapatnam, who emphasized on the changing nature of the industries and the need for academicians to stay updated with the latest trends in the field. This was followed by three engaging sessions by Prof. Subir Verma, on aligning teaching to the learner’s requirements, on
6
enhancing an academic institute’s connection with the corporate world beyond placements, into areas such as curriculum designing, live projects, and knowledge sharing, and on the Accreditation process and how to holistically prepare an institute for an accreditation.
Day 2 was dedicated to three sessions on teaching practices, where Prof Vinay Ramani focused on Teaching Styles, teaching objectives, and developing effective course outlines, followed by two interactive sessions by Prof. Anupama Sharma on Experiential Exercises and Case-Based Teaching. The afternoon session by Prof. Bishakha Majumdar focused on personal development through best practices in Time Management for Academicians.
Day 3 focused on Project Management and Operational Decision Making, with two knowledge-intensive sessions by Prof. B. Srirangacharyulu. This was followed by two activity-driven sessions by Prof. Majumdar, on enhancing Employability of Students, and Managing Stress and gaining Work-Life Balance.
On Day 4, Prof. Amit B. Chakrabarti introduced the participants to the role of campus architecture and infrastructure in an institution’s development. Prof. Srinivasan G. subsequently briefed the participants on the best practices of Networking and Mentoring in Academic Institutions and the latest Trends in Technical Education. The afternoon sessions consisted of Prof. Deepika Gupta providing an overview of Financial Management in Academic Institutions, followed by Prof. M. Chandrasekhar driving an animated discussion on the importance and the process of realizing the mission and vision of one’s Institution.
Day 5, the final day, saw three knowledge-intensive sessions by Prof. Ganesh Prabhu, who discussed the best practices for driving research and consultancy in Academia, the use of technology in classrooms and online education. The valedictory address was delivered by Dr. O R Nandagopan, Outstanding Scientist and Director, Naval Science and Technological Laboratory (NSTL), DRDO, Government of India, who focused on the value of engineering institutions to be industry-ready, and to contribute to the larger cause of nation-building.
In addition to the training sessions, participants were taken out in the evenings to various tourist attractions of Visakhapatnam, such as museums, beaches, and natural spots. The Networking Dinner was organized on 18 July evening, where the participants met and shared views with the faculty fraternity of IIM Visakhapatnam.
Feedback from the Participants Session-wise feedback was collected from the participants at the end of each session, where participants were asked to anonymously rate the resource person on a scale of 1-5 (with 5 indicating the highest level of agreement/satisfaction), on five parameters. The overall feedback for the training was collected in a similar fashion on the last day, before the valedictory. The feedback from the participants is summarized on pages 7-9.
7
Resource Person
Session
Was
the
sess
ion
info
rmat
ive,
pro
vidi
ng
valu
able
info
rmat
ion
on th
e to
pic?
Was
the
sess
ion
enga
ging
, stim
ulat
ing
disc
ussi
on a
nd e
xcha
nge
of th
ough
ts
amon
g pa
rtic
ipan
ts?
Has
the
sess
ion
prov
ided
you
act
iona
ble
inpu
ts to
be
appl
ied
at y
our w
orkp
lace
?
Was
the
facu
lty a
ble
to a
nsw
er q
ueri
es a
nd
clar
ify d
oubt
s of p
artic
ipan
ts?
Did
the
facu
lty c
ome
acro
ss a
s hav
ing
sign
ifica
nt c
omm
and
over
the
subj
ect
mat
ter,
or b
eing
a d
omai
n ex
pert
? O
vera
ll le
vel o
f sat
isfa
ctio
n w
ith th
e se
ssio
n
Comments
DAY 1 Subir Verma Professor, OB & HR, FORE School of Management, New Delhi
1)Aligning Teaching to Learning Outcomes: Teachers in Leadership Roles 2)Industry-Academia Connect: Curricula Development Talent-supply & Capacity-building 3)Accreditation in Academic Institutions
4.53 4.83 4.36 4.67 4.61 4.67
Very informative and inspiring lecture A session that introduced the current topics in academics and will certainly help in improving teaching Excellent, Interactive
DAY 2 Vinay Ramani Associate Professor, Economics, IIM Visakhapatnam
Developing Teaching Styles 4.26 4.48 4.24 4.65 4.61 4.45
Faculty was professional in approach; composed and friendly in equal measure; Planned and prepared Good topic for teaching faculty to use in their premises
Anupama Sharma Assistant Professor, OB & HRM, IIM Visakhapatnam
Case-based Teaching 3.88 4.33 3.70 4.27 4.27 4.06
An engaging session Edge of case study approach over traditional methods was very nicely explained
Experiential Exercises 4.11 4.41 3.50 4.28 4.17 4.22
While the exercises do serve their purpose, one needs more assurance on how they may be viably applied to different learning environments
Bishakha Majumdar Assistant Professor, OB & HRM, IIM Visakhapatnam
Time Management: Best Practices from the Academia
4.75 4.75 4.78 4.78 4.83 4.74
Outstanding. Very good real time examples Constructive suggestions to implement in daily life.
8
Resource Person
Session
Was
the
sess
ion
info
rmat
ive,
pro
vidi
ng
valu
able
info
rmat
ion
on th
e to
pic?
Was
the
sess
ion
enga
ging
, stim
ulat
ing
disc
ussi
on a
nd e
xcha
nge
of th
ough
ts
amon
g pa
rtic
ipan
ts?
Has
the
sess
ion
prov
ided
you
act
iona
ble
inpu
ts to
be
appl
ied
at y
our w
orkp
lace
?
Was
the
facu
lty a
ble
to a
nsw
er q
ueri
es
and
clar
ify d
oubt
s of p
artic
ipan
ts?
Did
the
facu
lty c
ome
acro
ss a
s hav
ing
sign
ifica
nt c
omm
and
over
the
subj
ect
mat
ter,
or b
eing
a d
omai
n ex
pert
? O
vera
ll le
vel o
f sat
isfa
ctio
n w
ith th
e se
ssio
n
Comments
DAY 3 B. Srirangacharyulu Associate Professor, Production and Operations Management, IIM Visakhapatnam
Project Management 4.28 4.22 4.09 4.25 4.50 4.42
Very useful Very good. More practical cases could be discussed
Decision-Making using Spreadsheets
4.59 4.52 4.41 4.59 4.66 4.61
A very experience faculty who knows his job Outstanding. Such a course may be repeated
Bishakha Majumdar Assistant Professor, OB & HRM, IIM Visakhapatnam
Making Students Employment-Ready
4.74 4.71 4.77 4.69 4.71 4.67
Quite engaging as it had a few open-ended problems Excellent presentation with interactive discussion
Stress Management: Managing Physical & Psychological Stress for Work-Life Balance
4.91 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.97 4.88 Complete soothing of mind Ultimate experience. If possible, include one more session
DAY 4 Amit B. Chakrabarti Assistant Professor, Corporate Strategy and Policy, IIM Visakhapatnam
Strategizing for World-class Campuses
4.56 4.53 4.47 4.65 4.62 4.64
Well-prepared, methodical approach, efficient delivery Did full justice to the subject Nicely explained the features of world class universities/institutions
Srinivasan G. Professor, Department of Management Studies, IIT Madras
Trends in Technical Education
4.42 4.34 4.22 4.58 4.61 4.30
Life-long learning really influenced us High on experience and knowledge, grounded in the basics, Fine communication, Propagates values
Networking and Mentoring in
Academic Institutions
4.64 4.46 4.50 4.64 4.79 4.58
Wonderful presentation with day-to-day experiences Experiential learning and teaching emphasized
Deepika Gupta Assistant Professor, Corporate Strategy and Policy, IIM Visakhapatnam
Financial Management in
Academic Institutions
4.53 4.56 4.32 4.65 4.68 4.53
Quite informed faculty and engaging in the class Explanation with relevant examples was very good
9
Resource Person
Session
Was
the
sess
ion
info
rmat
ive,
pro
vidi
ng
valu
able
info
rmat
ion
on th
e to
pic?
Was
the
sess
ion
enga
ging
, stim
ulat
ing
disc
ussi
on a
nd e
xcha
nge
of th
ough
ts
amon
g pa
rtic
ipan
ts?
Has
the
sess
ion
prov
ided
you
act
iona
ble
inpu
ts to
be
appl
ied
at y
our w
orkp
lace
?
Was
the
facu
lty a
ble
to a
nsw
er q
ueri
es
and
clar
ify d
oubt
s of p
artic
ipan
ts?
Did
the
facu
lty c
ome
acro
ss a
s hav
ing
sign
ifica
nt c
omm
and
over
the
subj
ect
mat
ter,
or b
eing
a d
omai
n ex
pert
? O
vera
ll le
vel o
f sat
isfa
ctio
n w
ith th
e se
ssio
n
Comments
M. Chandrasekhar Director, IIM Visakhapatnam
Leadership for Realising
Institutional Vision & Mission
4.82 4.91 4.79 4.88 4.88 4.79 Highly beneficial Excellent interactive session
DAY 5
Ganesh N. Prabhu Professor, Strategy, IIM Bangalore
Research in Academia: Sponsorship
and Management
4.06 3.94 3.74 4.26 4.16 4.03
Good presentation with case studies Include who, why and when regarding industry/business for offering consultancy for the benefit of young/middle age faculty
Consultancy in Academia: Skills and
Techniques 4.31 4.38 4.04 4.23 4.38 4.38
These innovative ideas should be implemented to all colleges of India Very useful
ICT-enabled Pedagogy
4.50 4.54 4.42 4.46 4.50 4.72
Identification of subject specific interactive class (ICT-enabled) for UG/PG students Excellent
OVERALL TRAINING FEEDBACK
Wer
e th
e se
ssio
ns in
gen
eral
in
form
ativ
e, p
rovi
ding
val
uabl
e in
form
atio
n on
the
topi
c?
Wer
e th
e se
ssio
ns in
gen
eral
en
gagi
ng, s
timul
atin
g di
scus
sion
an
d ex
chan
ge o
f tho
ught
s am
ong
part
icip
ants
?
Have
the
sess
ions
in g
ener
al
prov
ided
you
act
iona
ble
inpu
ts to
be
app
lied
at y
our w
orkp
lace
?
Have
the
reso
urce
per
sons
in
gene
ral b
een
able
to a
nsw
er
quer
ies a
nd c
larif
y do
ubts
of
part
icip
ants
?
Did
the
reso
urce
per
sons
in
gene
ral c
ome
acro
ss a
s hav
ing
sign
ifica
nt c
omm
and
over
the
subj
ect m
atte
r, or
bei
ng a
dom
ain
expe
rt?
Ove
rall
leve
l of s
atis
fact
ion
with
th
e ac
adem
ic se
ssio
ns
4.61 4.65 4.42 4.68 4.71 4.71
10
Training Assessment with Recommendations The five-day TEQIP-III Professional Development Training Programme saw the
presence of 37 academicians from different corners of the country in IIM Visakhapatnam. The core themes that ran through the sessions were:
1. Exposure to and identification of the best practices from academia across the world that can make teaching, research, administration. and consultancy efficient and effective for the present gathering,
2. Customization of the tools and techniques discussed to the recipient’s context, i.e., engineering education, to the extent possible
3. Peer-to-peer knowledge sharing so that the participants benefitted from knowing what other engineering institutions are doing well, and
4. Facilitation in the participants a sense of urgency to change, an attitude of openness and interest towards the latest innovative methods, and a willingness for continuous self-improvement that in turn translates into holistic development of the prime stakeholders of educational institutions – the students and the society.
The training programme saw enthusiastic participation from the audience from the beginning, as Resource Persons established the urgency to change. Sessions had a blend of knowledge and experience-sharing, experiential activities, and animated discussions on issues of importance. Resource persons also effectively demonstrated engaging and easy to use teaching methods such as Chalk and Talk, Power point presentations, games, online polls, and group activities, in their respective sessions.
To facilitate retention of key takeaways, the participants were divided in teams, and each team made a presentation at the start of the training day, summarizing the key takeaways from the previous days’ sessions. In addition, the participants engaged in formal and informal interaction with the faculty and the students at IIM Visakhapatnam, during the networking dinner and between the training sessions.
Training assessment was done through training evaluation by participants in terms of perceived effectiveness of delivery and perceived relevance of the content. The overall rating received by the programme was 4.71 out of 5. The participants’ comments gathered through the anonymous training feedback are listed:
11
Excellent planning and delivery All sessions were very interactive, informative and useful This is my first PDT. This programme well-designed and showed effective time management Thanks, IIMV team for the excellent hospitality at every point of our PDT. I look forward to seeing this place again in future Very good lectures and topics were arranged for the participants I hope, we will have this type of programmes again and gather more information
In addition to the above, some valuable insights were received for the way forward:
Some more lectures on management regarding the administration and research methodology is needed More space may be provided for participants to share their experiences For some topics, there should be more focus on how it could be implemented on ground reality or practical ground More sessions on stress management, project management In future may please include a session or two on entrepreneurship
Based on the above, the following recommendations are made:
1. To facilitate adult learning, future TEQIP sessions should continue to be engaging, relevant to realistic issues faced at the workplace, and have a balance between knowledge-sharing and experiential activities.
2. Future programmes may include sessions on Entrepreneurship incubation, designed to empower faculty members to guide engineering students interested in entrepreneurial journey, lead the institute incubation centres, and give courses an entrepreneurial flavour.
3. Future programmes should have additional sessions specifically focussed on building Administrative Skills – such as financial management, campus management, project management, or library management – empowering faculty members to be effective in their Faculty Coordinator roles in their respective institutions
4. Since self-care is crucial to energize academicians in their professional roles, future programmes should have additional sessions – if necessary, in the afterhours – on Yoga and Relaxation Practices, Stress Management, Self-Enhancement, and Life Skills.
12
5. There should be at least 1 session dedicated to Experience Sharing by Participants, where they may discuss Best Practices in their respective institutions, or the way they have found innovative solutions to professional problems.
6. While efforts have been made in the present training to contextualize the content to the engineering context, future trainings need further cognizance in this area so that the cases, activities, and research methods used may be easily adopted to the technical disciplines
7. Future programmes may have an evaluative component – where teams of participants are asked to use one of the teaching methods introduced to them in the training, to teach a topic to the rest of the class. Alternatively, they may be asked to redesign their session plans or course outlines to make them more interactive or industry-driven.
Glimpses from the Programme
Shri Prasad Dahapute delivering the inaugural
address Prof. Subir Verma in his session
Prof. Vinay Ramani in the session on Teaching
Styles Prof. Anupama Sharma speaking on case-based teaching
13
Prof. Srirangacharyulu teaching Project Management Group Activity
Group Discussion during the Session
14
Prof. Chakrabarti speaking on world-class
institutions Prof. Deepika Gupta explaining financial management
Prof. Ganesh Prabhu on ICT Prof. Srinivasan leading a discussion on networking
Stress Management Exercises
15
Prof. Bishakha Majumdar speaking on Work-Life
Balance Team Presentation on key takeaways
Prof. Chandrasekhar, Director, IIM
Visakhapatnam, addressing the participants Experience sharing by participants
16
Dr. O. R. Nandagopan, Director, NSTL, DRDO, at
the Valedictory Awarding certificates
Programme participants and the IIM Visakhapatnam faculty at the Networking Dinner
17
Appendices
1. List of Participants (in alphabetical order)
Sr.
Sl. Name Designation Department & Institution
E-mail ID
1 Mr. Alok Kumar H.O.D Nalanda College of Engineering, Chandi, Nalanda
2 Ms. Amrita A. Manjrekar
Assistant Professor
Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur
3 Dr. Anamika Chauhan
Assistant Professor
Delhi Technological University, NCT Delhi
4 Mr. Anish Kumar
Assistant Professor & Dean Academics
Rajkiya Engineering College Azamgarh
5 Dr. Ashok Kumar
Assistant Professor (ECE) & Nodal Officer (Procurement), TEQIP Cell
Govt. Mahila Engg College, Ajmer
6 Dr. Asini Kumar Baliarsingh
Associate Professor
Government College of Engineering, Kalahandi, Odisha
7 Mr Brajendra Shukla
HOD, Assistant Professor, Biotechnology, TEQIP-III Coordinator
Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi
8 Mr. Chaitanya Nidhi
Assistant Professor & TEQIP-III Coordinator
Rajkiya Engineering College Azamgarh
9 Er. Chandan Kumar
Assistant Professor
IET Ayodhya (Dr.RML Avadh University)
10 Dr. Deba Prasad Dash
Associate Professor
Government College of Engineering, Kalahandi, Odisha
11 Dr. Dharmendra Tripathi
Associate Professor
National Institute of Technology Uttarakhand
18
12 Dr. Dhiren Kumar Behera
Assistant Professor (Selection Grade)
Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang
13 Dr. G K Agrawal
Professor Government Engineering College, Bilaspur
14 Dr. Hariharan Muthusamy
Associate Professor
National Institute of Technology Uttarakhand
15 Dr. Harpuneet Singh
Assistant Professor & Deputy Controller
GNDEC Ludhiana [email protected]
16 Mr. Jibesh Datta Assistant Professor
Tripura Institute of Technology, Narsingarh, Tripura
17 Dr. Kanupriya Sachdev
Professor MNIT Jaipur [email protected]
18 Ms.
Kumari Priyanka Sinha
HOD CSE Nalanda College of Engineering, Chandi, Nalanda
19 Dr. M V V Chandana Lakshmi
Professor, Dept Of Chemical Engineering
A U College of Engg, Visakhapatnam
20 Dr. Munish Rattan
Assistant Professor
GNDEC Ludhiana [email protected]
21 Dr. N Prema Kumar
Professor A U College of Engg, Visakhapatnam
22 Mrs.
N.J. Kotmire Assistant Professor
Department of Technology , Shivaji University Kolhapur
23 Prof.
P V Ramana Assistant Professor
MNIT Jaipur [email protected]
24 Prof.
R.K. Mahajan
Assistant Professor
Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh
25 Mr. Rahul Ranjan
Assistant Professor (CSE) & Nodal Officer(Procurement), TEQIP Cell
University College of Engineering and Technology (UCET), Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribag, Jharkhand
26 Dr. Rakesh Biswas
Assistant Professor
IIIT Guwahati [email protected]
27 Mr. Ravi Prakash Pandey
Assistant Professor
IET Ayodhya (Dr.RML Avadh University)
19
28 Dr. S. K. Patil Dean, Students Welfare
Govt College of Engineering, Karad
29 Dr. S.K. Jarial Professor Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science& Technology, Murthal, Haryana
30 Dr. Sangeeta Vishwakarma
HOD Chemistry University College of Engineering and Technology (UCET), Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribag, Jharkhand
31 Dr. Shovan Barma
Assistant Professor
IIIT Guwahati [email protected]
32 Mr. Siddhartha Das
Assistant Professor, Training & Placement Officer
Tripura Institute of Technology, Narsingarh, Tripura
33 Dr. Suryakant H. Pawar
Associate Professor
Govt College of Engineering, Karad
34 Prof.
T. Ramashri Professor SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati
35 Dr. V M Murthy Professor, TEQIP Coordinator
Faculty of Science, Kurukshetra University
36 Dr. V. Usha Reddy
Assistant Professor
SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati
37 Dr. Vinod Balakrishnan V
Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences
NIT Trichy [email protected]
20
Attendance Sheets
21
22
23
24