report 1 finale

Upload: jithesh-dharmadas

Post on 20-Feb-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    1/119

    CHAPTER 1

    OVERVIEW

    1.1 OBJECTIVE

    Design of prefabricated modular housing for different occupancies for the

    inhabitants (about 5327 households) displaced due to the implementation of the

    Pancheshwar Power Project on Mahakali i!er ("epal)#

    1.2 NECESSITY

    Pancheshwar Power Project is proposed as a "epal$%ndia bi$national scheme

    on the Mahakali i!er with a capacit& of '72 M# ith its implementation* a total of

    +,*33 persons from 5327 households ha!e been displaced for which rehabilitation

    works ha!e to be completed b& 2,2$2,3 but as for now the progress is too slow to

    reach the deadline#

    -or faster construction and as an approach to affordable homes* it is

    proposed to pro!ide a solution to mass housing using modular coordination method#

    1.3 SCOPE

    .he project en!isages selection of a suitable plan as per modular

    coordination and use of building architecture for proper functioning and orientation of

    the building#

    1

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    2/119

    .he houses are proposed to be classified on the basis of income groups (i#e#

    /igh %ncome 0roup* Medium %ncome 0roup and 1ow %ncome 0roup) which will thendecide the corresponding plan areas#

    1.4 METHODOLOGY

    election of a realistic site#

    uggestion of a suitable plan for mass housing with grid dimensions#

    election of t&pe of precast structural s&stem#

    ollection of necessar& data and codal pro!isions as per re4uired for the

    project#

    election of t&pe of connection to be emplo&ed#

    Design of structural precast members#

    doption of t&pical joints and connections between precast and in$situ

    members#

    %nstallation of the members as per design plan.

    Pro!ision for grid wise e6tension of the designed plan#

    1.5 MAJOR DESIGN EXPERIENCE

    1. Planning and la&out using modular coordination for different occupancies#

    2. 0rid wise distribution of plan#

    3. Design of connections between indi!idual precast members#

    4. Design of structural and non$ structural precast members#

    1.6 REALISTIC DESIGN CONSTRAINTS

    2

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    3/119

    1. Man!a"#$%n& "'n(#$a%n#(

    .he functional plan and the construction technolog& shall ensure that the

    project can be implemented in the shortest possible time with acceptable4ualit

    2. Sa!)#* "'n(#$a%n#(

    .he design of all joints between prefabricated components shall meet the

    accepted procedures#

    3. S'"%a+ "'n(#$a%n#(

    .he compulsion to pro!ide housing for people belonging to different strata in

    societ& within the shortest possible time due to mass displacement#

    1., RE-ERENCE TO CODES AND STANDARDS

    Ta+) 1.1 R)!)$)n") #' "'/)( an/ (#an/a$/(.

    C'/)( C'n#)0#

    % ,278 ,92

    ode for practice for design and construction of floors and roof

    using precast reinforced: prestressed concrete#

    % +5'8 2

    Plain and einforced oncrete $ ode of Practice

    1imit state design method* Material stresses* Design

    coefficients#

    % 3358,''ode of Practice for omposite onstruction

    % 9758 ,97

    Part (,;2)

    Design loads for buildings and structures (Dead load ;

    %mposed load)#

    1. APPLICATION O- EARLIER CORSE WOR

    3

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    4/119

    Ta+) 1.2 A+%"a#%'n '! )a$+%)$ "'$() '$(

    1.7

    M

    LTIDISCIPLINARY COMPONENT AND TEAM WOR

    .his project in!ol!es in interacting with the go!ernment officials of the

    Pancheshwar Project for getting necessar& data#

    1.18 SO-TWARE9E:IPMENT SED

    ngineering Design of foundation

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    5/119

    2. ompletion of the project will finall& help in gaining !ital and practical

    implementations in accordance with safet& and ser!iceabilit& of the designed

    units#

    1.12 -TRE SCOPE O- THE PROJECT

    .he implementation of the project will be of a great help to the rising need

    of 4uicker construction and in the field of mass housing techni4ues#

    %t will be a boon for the weaker sections of societ& where owning a house is

    still a common dream and the economic ad!antage of the project would be

    effecti!el& implemented#

    Pro!isions for e6tension of plan for other suitabilit& issues is also included

    for satisf&ing different functional needs#

    5

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    6/119

    CHAPTER 2

    INTRODCTION

    2.1 GENERAL

    s a ci!il engineer* one should be familiar with all the aspects of ci!il

    engineering practices be it housing* industrial* roads* airports* docks and harbors* dams*

    transmission line towers an other h&draulic structures together with power plant

    structures# .he curriculum for ci!il engineering* which has been e6posed all these four

    &ears* has dealt with the rudiments of the abo!e subjects in our curriculum# %n order to

    ha!e hands on e6perience with respect to designing a project* in which the design of

    ## structural elements is in!ol!ed* is taken#

    2.2 LITERATRE REVIEW

    .he basic principle of prefabrication* whereb& a home is prefabricated in one

    location and then deli!ered to another* has been around for at least a few hundred &ears#

    .he most widel& cited benefit of prefab is econom& of scale* as components or entire

    homes can be produced in large 4uantities# ?ut this is not a prere4uisite for success#

    .hereAs !alue in faster project schedules* fewer weather dela&s* and more efficient use of

    materials thanks to optimiBation and 4ualit& control# =ne of the primar& benefits for the

    bu&er is predictabilit&8 Predefined design details and construction processes gi!e the

    client a degree of suret& about the outcome that is often absent in custom projects#

    2.2.1 P$)()n# (")na$%' a$'n/ #

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    7/119

    ?etween ,9 and ,+* ears* oebuck* and ompan& sold o!er 7*

    prefabricated house kits b& mail to enterprising do$it$&ourselfers across "orth merica#

    .hese read&$to$assemble homes featured precut wooden components cross$referenced toa blueprint# .hanks to robust engineering* durable materials* and some good

    craftsmanship* man& of these homes are still in use#

    fter orld ar %% the ames /ouse* in

    Pacific Palisades* alifornia (,+)* e6plored the idea that a home could be constructed

    from off$the$shelf industrial parts and harness economies of scale for read&$made

    components#

    %n the ,7s the

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    8/119

    .he most widel& cited benefit of prefab is econom& of scale* as components

    or entire homes can be produced in large 4uantities# ?ut this is not a prere4uisite for

    success# .hereAs !alue in faster project schedules* fewer weather dela&s* and moreefficient use of materials thanks to optimiBation and 4ualit& control# =ne of the primar&

    benefits for the bu&er is predictabilit&8 Predefined design details and construction

    processes gi!e the client a degree of suret& about the outcome that is often absent in

    custom projects#

    -ew of the following de!elopment trends ha!e been adopted in the recent

    projects8

    Majorit& of the latent defects such as poor joining and water leakage problems

    found in

    pre!ious projects ha!e been eliminated using in$situ fi6ed approach#

    pplication has been di!ersified to other form of building construction#

    apable of appl&ing to the construction of rather complicate shaped buildings#

    More precast elements are in!ol!ed in the construction process#

    =ther techni4ues like the using of mechanical formwork s&stem* lost$form or

    tensioning techni4ues* are incorporated in the construction process (ef# 2)

    2.2.2 P$)!a$%"a#%'n %n /)=)+'%n& "'n#$%)(> a "a() (#/* '! In/%a

    Prefabrication in %ndia began with the emergence of the /industan /ousing

    -actor .he compan& was de!eloped b& the first Prime Minister of %ndia* Pandit

    Cawaharlal "ehru* as a solution to the housing crisis that resulted from the influ6 ofrefugees from est Pakistan in the ,5s# .he /industan /ousing -actor& pioneered the

    production of pre$stressed concrete railwa& sleepers to replace dilapidated wooden

    sleepers on %ndian ailwa&s# .he compan& changed its name shortl& thereafter to reflect

    the di!ersit& of its operations# %t is now known as the /industan Prefab 1imited or /P1#

    8

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    9/119

    1ocated in Delhi* toda& the go!ernment$ run compan& prefabricates primaril& precast

    concrete for architectural and ci!il projects throughout greater %ndia#

    hen /P1 began it was intended to produce low$income housing solutions

    for the deficit in %ndia# Precast wall panels and frame members such as beams and

    columns pro!ided a much needed set of tools to erect 4uick structures for mass housing#

    .he most difficult technolog& transfer obstacle for the /P1 has been the cost of

    machiner& and materials for production# ince the go!ernment could not recoup the

    return on in!estment for the factor& through housing production* prefabrication from

    /P1 began to ser!ice other markets including higher dollar ci!il and larger public and

    hotel buildings#

    .he 4ualit& of construction is much higher when components are

    manufactured in a stable en!ironment such as the factor .his is especiall& true in %ndia

    where toda&* prefabrication has become s&non&mous with durable* modern* and western

    construction methods# Materials are used more efficientl&* are safer from climatic

    damage* and can be reused in the material stream# ?ecause of these benefits* a general

    consensus in %ndia is to mo!e prefabricated building s&stems be&ond precast concrete

    for large$scale construction to additional market sectors including a resurgent interest in

    appl&ing prefabrication technolog& to housing#

    .raditional construction techni4ues in!ol!e the use of timber molds or

    shuttering for roof spans and other structural s&stems# .hese temporar& timber structures

    ha!e a short lifespan and due to the !olume of construction in the peak seasons of spring

    and summer for larger well$funded projects are often una!ailable# .his hinders

    construction schedules and does not allow projects to be completed before cooler or

    rain& seasons begin# /owe!er* construction does not stop in the summer despite the lack

    of proper e4uipment and material# %nstead* using makeshift methods for construction on

    site leads to inappropriate means and hence a substandard 4ualit& of construction in

    9

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    10/119

    finished buildings# .he prefabricated alternati!e to roof construction remo!es the issues

    of timber molds and shuttering#

    Material ad!ances in the prefabrication housing market ha!e also helped to

    mitigate material failures# .he use of fl& ash in concrete increases its workabilit& and

    impro!es thermal performance# %n addition* fl& ash concrete block is beginning to

    replace traditional cla& bricks because it does not contain e6pansi!e soils that cause

    walls and floors to crack with flu6es of temperature and humidit -l& ash is captured

    from the coal burning process that generate electricit& and then reused to manufacture

    more durable and stable building materials in a factor& en!ironment# .he material

    manufacturing is more predictable and therefore ser!es to build more seismicall&

    resistant structures#

    Prefabrication technolog& has not transferred as easil& when compared with

    other technologies because it is a production technolog& or knowledge based and not a

    consumption technolog& or product based# .echnolog& transfer of prefabrication is not

    as pertinent to architects as it is to manufacturers of building products* but we are

    caretakers of culture in the > industr %n man& cases we are asked to help with man&

    of the transfers that are occurring b& wa& of global practice or working for multi$

    national firms that are producing prefabricated components and entire buildings for %ndia

    and elsewhere# lthough transfers will continue to occur* especiall& in the area of

    prefabrication in building* we should be well aware of how the decisions of

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    11/119

    labor issues# ?& casting all the building elements at one go* which is monolithic in

    nature results in elimination of stage construction practice* thus dri!es Prefab techni4ues

    in bigger and faster wa& in mass housing* presentl& in %ndia this sector stri!e to deli!erthe houses for urban poor and middle class# .he project including construction of a

    cluster of 35 houses was implemented b& aji! 0andhi /ousing for .he arnataka

    /ousing ?oard 0o!ernment of arnataka# pecifications of the project include the

    following8

    > /ouse for

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    12/119

    =n peed8

    t site* 3 da& or + da& c&cle can be easil& achie!able and can complete the

    entire house in a week time# .he -oundation* all ; oof components has to be

    designed* based on the soil ; structural considerations# ll the details of >lectrical ;

    Plumbing has to be precise and shall be placed in position before concreting# /owe!er*

    the prefab technolog& is &et to mature enough in terms of cost* assembl& of elements at

    site* issues associated with Coints ; its sealants etc#

    =n Fualit&8

    .he de$shuttering shall be done for wall ; roof after 2+ hours of concreting*

    b& lea!ing ade4uate props to support roof concrete# /ence 4ualit& houses are built at one

    go# .he maintenance of these houses o!er period will be !er& less or minimum# %n all

    other methods* considerable change in design* manual errors* rectification* repetitions of

    works etc# is seen during the project period and subse4uentl& demands high maintenance

    cost#

    =n 1abor8

    .he re4uirement of labors is !er& minimum and hence* lesser 4ualit& issues

    and speedier construction#

    =n .echnolog&8

    .he Prefab .echnolog& deli!ers the strong houses* which are more durable*

    ; sustainable against tornados* earth4uakes etc#* compare to an& other methods of

    construction#

    2.3 SMMARY O- LITERATRE REVIEW

    12

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    13/119

    =ne of the major ad!ancements in construction technolog& has been

    prefabricated structure# -or a countr& like %ndia that is on the cusp of a massi!e

    infrastructure upgrade* prefabricated structures (better known as prefabs) ha!e a hugepositi!e implication# Prefabs ha!e a sprawling market in %ndia in areas ranging from

    large industrial and commercial construction to mass housing# s far as mass housing

    goes* the ad!antages of prefab are se!eral# -irst* it eliminates the need for constant

    shuttering and scaffolding# %n the prefab method* self$supporting precast concrete

    structures are used that promise to e6pedite the construction time* apart from

    standardiBing the 4ualit& of the structure# eduction in gestation period means faster

    returns on in!estment and of course* faster occupanc& of the houses#

    Population e6plosion has alwa&s been a bottleneck to the de!elopment for

    the %ndian societ& pro!iding housing for economicall& weaker sections (>) and low

    income groups is both gigantic and a comple6 problem# %ndia desperatel& needs a lot of

    rapid dwelling units# Mass housing projects prefabrication techni4ue is one of the

    solutions to the o!ergrowing problem* which is benefitted through the following

    ad!antages8

    elf$supporting read&$made components are used* so the need for formwork*

    shuttering and scaffolding is greatl& reduced#

    onstruction time is reduced and buildings are completed sooner* allowing an

    earlier return of the capital in!ested#

    =n$site construction and congestion is minimiBed#

    Fualit& control can be easier in a factor& assembl& line setting than a

    construction site setting#

    Prefabrication can be located where skilled labour is more readil& a!ailable and

    costs of labour* power* materials* space and o!erheads are lower#

    .ime spent in bad weather or haBardous en!ironments at the construction site is

    minimiBed#

    13

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    14/119

    1ess waste ma& occur#

    d!anced materials such assandwich$structured compositecan be easil& used*

    impro!ing thermal and sound insulation and air tightness#

    14

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandwich-structured_compositehttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandwich-structured_compositehttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandwich-structured_composite
  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    15/119

    CHAPTER 3

    OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE

    3.1 OBJECTIVE

    %n rehabilitation works for the gi!en power plant project* there is a need forfaster construction and as an approach to affordable homes for 5327 households* we

    propose8

    .he design of a modular house using prefabrication techni4ues#

    3.2 SCOPE

    .he rehabilitation site is Pithoragarh where an area of 9, hectares (2

    acres) is allotted as shown in -igure 3#,#

    15

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    16/119

    -%&. 3.1 Ma '! P%#

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    17/119

    %n order to reduce the time and cost of the project* it is proposed to adopt

    prefabricated housing in this project#

    .o minimise the number of components to be produced on a mass scale*

    modular coordination will be adopted b& planning the different housing re4uirements#

    3.3 MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

    .he precast structure should be anal&Bed as a monolithic one and thejoints in them designed to take the forces of an e4ui!alent discrete s&stem#

    esistance to horiBontal loading shall be pro!ided b& ha!ing appropriate moment

    and shear resisting joints or placing shear walls in two directions at right angle or

    otherwise# "o account is to be taken of rotational stiffness* if an& of the floor$wall

    joint in case of precast bearing wall building# .he indi!idual components shall be

    designed* taking into consideration the appropriate end conditions and loads at

    !arious stages of construction# .he components of the structure shall be designed for

    loads in accordance with code# %n addition members shall be designed for handling*

    e6ertion and impact loads that might be e6pected during handling and erection#

    3.3.1 T)$;%n'+'&* an/ ()"%!%"a#%'n(

    Harious terms included in Modular oordination are8

    ,# Module$ a unit of siBe used in dimensional coordination#

    17

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    18/119

    2# Modular grid$ a rectangular coordinate reference s&stem in which the distance

    between consecuti!e lines is the basic module or a multi module# .his multi

    module ma& differ for each of the two dimensions of the grid#3# Modular oordination$ a dimensional coordination emplo&ing the basic module

    or a multi module# .he purposes of Modular oordination are to reduce the

    !ariet& of component siBes produced and to allow the building designer greater

    fle6ibilit& in the arrangement of components#

    +# Multi module$ a module whose siBe is a selected multiple of the basic module#

    -or selecting the materials for prefabrication the following factors should be

    considered8

    (a) >as& a!ailabilit& (b) 1ight weight for eas& handling and transport (c)

    .hermal insulation propert& (d) >as& workabilit& (e) Durabilit& (f) "on combustibilit&

    (g) ound insulation (h) >conom& (i) an& other special re4uirement in a particular

    application#

    3.3.2 R+)( $)+a#)/ #' a(%" )+);)n#(

    set of rules as detailed below would be ade4uate for meeting the

    re4uirements of con!entional and prefabricated construction# ules relate to the

    following basic element8

    (a) .he planning grid in both directions of the horiBontal plan shall be 3 M for residential

    buildings# .he center lines of load bearing walls should preferabl& coincide with the

    gridlines#

    (b) .he planning module in the !ertical direction shall be ,M for residential buildings#

    18

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    19/119

    (c) Preferred increments for sill heights* doors* and windows and other fenestration shall

    be ,M#

    (d) %n the case of internal columns* the grid lines shall coincide with the center lines of

    columns# %n case of e6ternal columns and columns near the lift and stairwells* the grid

    lines shall coincide with center lines of the column in the topmost store

    3.3.3 R+)( $)+a#)/ #' "';'n)n#(

    .he preferred dimensions of precast elements shall be as follows where M

    represents a Module8

    (a) -looring and oofing cheme8 Precast slabs or other precast structural flooring units8

    ,# 1ength $ "ominal length shall be in multiples of ,M#

    2# idth $ "ominal width shall be in multiples of #5 M#

    3# =!erall .hickness8 =!erall thickness shall be in multiples of #, M#

    (b) ?eams8

    ,# 1ength $ "ominal length shall be in multiples of , M#

    2# idth $ "ominal width shall be in multiples of #, M#

    3# =!erall Depth $ =!erall depth of the floor Bone shall be in multiples of #, M#

    (c) olumns8

    19

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    20/119

    ,# /eight $ /eight of columns for industrial and other building , M#

    2# 1ateral Dimensions $ =!erall lateral dimension or diameter of columns shall

    be in multiples of #, M#

    (d) alls8

    .hickness $ .he nominal thickness of walls shall be in multiples of #, M#

    (e) 1intels8

    ,# 1ength $ "ominal length shall be in multiples of , M#

    2# idth $ "ominal width shall be in multiples of #, M#

    3# Depth $ "ominal depth shall be in multiples of #, M#

    3.3.4 R)@%$);)n#( !'$ /)(%&n "'n(%/)$a#%'n(

    (i) %n some con!entional forms of construction* e6perience has shown that the

    structures are capable of safel& sustaining abnormal conditions of loading and

    remaining stable after the remo!al of primar& structural member# %t has been shown

    that some forms of building structure and particularl& some industrialiBed large panel

    s&stem ha!e little reser!e strength to resist forces not specificall& catered for in the

    design#

    (ii) de4uate buttressing of e6ternal wall panels is important since these elements

    are not full& restrained on both sides b& floor panels# .he designer ma& take

    ade4uate design precautions# >6perience shows that the e6ternal wall panel

    connections are the weakest points of a precast panel building#

    20

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    21/119

    (iii) %t is e4uall& important to pro!ide restraint to all load bearing elements at the

    corners of the building# .hese elements and the e6ternal ends of cross$wall units

    should be stiffened either b& introducing columns as connecting units or b& jointingthem to non$structural wall units which in emergenc& ma& support the load# Cointing

    of these units should be done bearing in mind the need for load support in an

    emergenc

    (i!) %n prefabricated construction* the possibilit& of gas or other e6plosions which

    can remo!e primar& structural elements leading to progressi!e collapse of the

    structure shall be taken into account# %t is* therefore* necessar& to consider the

    possibilit& of progressi!e collapse in which the failure or displacement of one

    element of a structure causes the failure or displacement of another element and

    results in the partial or total collapse of the building#

    (!) Pro!ision in the design to reduce the probabilit& of progressi!e collapse is

    essential in buildings of o!er si6 store&s and is of relati!el& higher priorit& than for

    buildings of lower height#

    (!i) %t is necessar& to ensure that an& local damage to a structure does not spread to

    other parts of the structure remote from the point of mishap and that the o!erall

    stabilit& is not impaired* but it ma& not be necessar& to stiffen all parts of the

    structure against local damage or collapse in the immediate !icinit& of a mishap*

    unless the design briefs specificall& re4uires this to be done#

    (!ii) dditional protection ma& be re4uired in respect of damage from !ehicles*

    further it is necessar& to consider the effect of damage to or displacement of a load$

    bearing member b& an uncontrolled !ehicle# %t is strongl& recommended that

    concrete kerbs or similar method ade4uatel& protect important structural members#

    21

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    22/119

    (!iii) %n all aspects of erection that affect structural design* it is essential that the

    designer should maintain a close liaison with the builder or contractor regarding the

    erection procedures to be followed#

    (i6) -ailures that ha!e occurred during construction appear to be of two t&pes# .he

    first of these is the pack$of$cards t&pe of collapse in* which the absence of

    restraining elements* such as partitions* cladding or shear walls* and means that the

    structure is not stable during the construction period# .he second is the situation in

    which one element falls during erection and lands on an element below# .he

    connections of the lower element then gi!e wa& under the loading* both static and

    d&namic* and a chain reaction of further collapse is set up#

    precaution against the first form of failure is that the o!erall stabilit& of

    a building shall be considered in all its erection stages as well as in its completed

    state# ll joints that ma& be re4uired to resist moments and shears during the erection

    stage onl& shall be designed with these in mind# .emporar& works re4uired to

    pro!ide stabilit& during construction shall be designed carefull

    .o guard against the second form of failure* that is* the dropping of a unit

    during erection* particular attention shall be gi!en to the details of all pre$formed

    units and their seatings to ensure that the& are sufficientl& robust to withstand the

    ma6imum stresses that can arise from site conditions# Precast concrete construction

    generall& shall be capable of withstanding the impact forces that can arise from bad

    workmanship on site#

    22

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    23/119

    3.3.5 R)@%$);)n#( '! ?'%n#( an/ "'nn)"#%'n(

    .he design of joints shall be made in the light of their assessment with

    respect to the following considerations8

    (i) -easibilit& $ .he feasibilit& of a joint shall be determined b& its load$carr&ing

    capacit& in the particular situation in which the joint is to function#

    (ii) Practicabilit& $ Practicabilit& of joint shall be determined b& the amount and t&pe

    of material re4uired in construction* cost of material* fabrication and erection and the

    time for fabrication and erection#

    (iii) er!iceabilit& $ er!iceabilit& shall be determined b& the joints and e6pected

    beha!ior for repeated or possible o!erloading and e6posure to climatic or chemical

    conditions#

    (i!) -ire ating $ .he fire rating for joints of precast components shall be higher or at

    least e4ual to connecting members#

    (!) ppearance $ .he appearance of precast components joint shall merge with

    architectural aesthetic appearance and shall not be ph&sicall& prominent compared to

    other parts of structural components#

    .he following are the re4uirements of a structural joint8

    (a) %t shall be capable of being designed to transfer the imposed load and momentswith a known margin of safet

    (b) %t shall occur at logical locations in the structure and at points which ma& be most

    readil& anal&Bed and easil& reinforced#

    23

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    24/119

    (c) %t shall accept the loads without marked displacement or rotation and a!oid high

    local stresses#

    (d) %t shall accommodate tolerances in elements#

    (e) %t shall re4uire little temporar& support* permit adjustment and demand onl& a

    few distinct operation to make#

    (f) %t shall permit effecti!e inspection and rectification#

    (g) %t shall be reliable in ser!ice with other parts of the building#

    (h) %t shall enable the structure to absorb sufficient energ& during earth4uakes so as

    to a!oid sudden failure of the structure#

    Coining techni4ues:materials normall& emplo&ed are8

    (a) elding of cleats or projecting steel#

    (b) =!erlapping reinforcement* loops and linking steel grouted b& concrete#

    (c) einforced concrete ties all round a slab#

    (d) Prestressing#

    (e) >po6& grouting#

    (f) ?olts and nuts connection#

    (g) combination of the abo!e* and

    (h) n& other method pro!en b& test#

    24

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    25/119

    3.3.6 S#a"%n& /$%n& #$an('$# an/ (#'$a&)

    >!er& precaution shall be taken against o!erstress or damage* b& the

    pro!ision of suitable packings at agreed points of support# Particular attention is

    directed to the inherent dangers of breakage and damage caused b& supporting other

    than at two positions* and also b& the careless placing of packings for e6ample* not

    !erticall& one abo!e the other)# ibs* corners and intricate projections from solid

    section should be ade4uatel& protected# .acking pieces shall be ade4uatel& protected#

    .acking pieces shall not discolor* disfigure or otherwise permanentl& cause mark onunite or members# tacking shall be arranged or the precast units should be

    protected* so as to pre!ent the accumulation of trapped water or rubbish* and if

    necessar& to reduce the risk of efflorescence#

    .he following points shall be kept in !iew during stacking8

    (a) are should be taken to ensure that the flat elements are stacked with right side

    up# -or identification* top surfaces should be clearl& marked#

    (b) tacking should be done on a hard and suitable ground to a!oid an& sinking of

    support when elements are stacked#

    (c) %n case of horiBontal stacking* packing materials shall be at specified locations

    and shall be e6actl& one o!er the other to a!oid cantile!er stress in panels#

    (d) omponents should be packed in a uniform wa& to a!oid an& undue projection of

    elements in the stack* which normall& is a source of accident#

    25

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    26/119

    3.3., Han/+%n& a$$an&);)n#(

    1ifting and handling positions shall be dearl& defined particularl& where

    these sections are critical# here necessar& special facilities* such as bolt holes or

    projecting loops* shall be pro!ided in the units and full instructions supplied for

    handling#

    -or precast prestressed concrete members* the residual stress at the age

    of particular operation of handling and erection shall be considered in conjunction

    with an& stresses caused b& the handling or erection of member# .he compressi!e

    stress thus computed shall not e6ceed 5 percent of the cube strength of the concrete

    at the time of handling and erection#

    3.3. E@%;)n# $)@%$)/

    .he e4uipment used to the precast concrete industr&:construction ma& be

    classified into the following categories8

    (a) Machiner& re4uired for 4uarr&ing of coarse and fine aggregates#

    (b) on!e&ing e4uipment such as bolt con!e&ors* chain con!e&ors* screw con!e&ors*

    bucket ele!ators* hoists* etc#

    (c) oncrete mi6ing machines

    (d) oncrete !ibrating machines

    26

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    27/119

    (e) >rection e4uipment such as cranes* derricks* hoists* chain pulle& blocks* etc#

    f) .ransport machiner& such as tractor$cum$trailers* dumpers* lorries* locomoti!es*

    motor boats and rarel& e!en helicopters#

    (g) orkshop machiner& for making and repairing teel and timber moulds#

    (h) ?ar straightening* bending and welding machines to make reinforcement cages#

    (i) Minor tools and tackles such as wheelbarrows* concrete buckets* etc#

    (j) team generation plant for accelerated curing#

    %n addition to the abo!e* pumps and soil compacting machiner&are

    re4uired at the building site for the e6ecution of ci!il engineeringprojects in!ol!ing

    prefabricated components#

    3.4 CONCLDING REMARS

    %n order to cope with the demand for housing to fulfill the deficit in housing*

    prefabrication will definitel& sta& once it is adopted# .his ma& definitel& impro!e 4ualit&

    of construction* durabilit& of components* time of construction and aesthetics of

    surroundings# .he ne6t chapter gi!es the details of planning and design of prefab

    components as per Modular oordination and architectural inputs#

    27

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    28/119

    CHAPTER 4

    RESLTS AND DISCSSIONS

    4.1 PLANNING

    4.1.1 In#$'/"#%'n

    hile designing a building* the prere4uisite is a proper plan# .he procedure

    for selection of a plan encompasses plot dimensions and architectural inputs#

    Plot dimensions are gi!en or assumed 4uantities to which the plan must

    compl %t should ha!e the basic re4uirements of the building like a house needs

    a bedroom* li!ing area* kitchen* bathroom* toilet* dining area etc#

    rchitectural inputs such as the sun diagram are re4uired for a proper

    orientation of the building# nthropometrics* space standards* functional

    planning and circulation are other architectural inputs to be taken care of while

    designing a plan#

    .he introduction of Modular oordination in the industr& not onl&

    pro!ides dimensional basis for the coordination of dimensions and of those

    buildings incorporating them* but also it acts as a tool towards rationaliBation and

    industrialiBation of the building industr Modular oordination is essentiall&

    based on the use of modules (basic module and multi$modules) and a reference

    28

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    29/119

    s&stem to define coordinating spaces and Bones for building elements and for the

    components which form them# %t is a concept of coordination of dimension and

    space* in which buildings and components are dimensioned and positioned interms of a basic unit or module* known as , M# .here are standard rules to abide

    b& $ ules for locating building elements within the reference s&stemI ules for

    siBing building components in order to determine their work siBesI ules for

    defining preferred siBes for building components and coordinating dimensions

    for buildings# %t permits a fle6ible t&pe of standardiBation* which encourages the

    use of a limited number of standardiBed building components for the construction

    of different t&pes of buildings# %t ensures dimensional coordination between

    installation (e4uipment* storage units* other fitted furniture etc#) as well as with

    the rest of the building#

    .he application of Modular oordination ma& be applied to the design*

    manufacture and assembl& of buildings* their components and installations* and

    it affects the twin factors of position and dimension# Modular oordination ma&

    be applied to a wide range of building technologies* ranging from component

    building through partial prefabrication to rationaliBed traditional building

    methods# dditionall&* components* which are coordinated on a modular basis*

    ma& be used in reno!ation programs#

    4.1.2 ARCHITECTRAL INPTS

    4.1.2.1 ORIENTATION

    .he ideal house orientation is that the main long a6is of the building runs

    >ast$est* i#e# ridge line# %t is !er& important that the house should be oriented

    29

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    30/119

    with respect to the sun and not to magnetic north# .he most used rooms must be

    on the side of the house oriented towards the sun# lso the least used rooms on

    the side of the house in shade# .he orientation of a house is done according to thesun$diagram as shown in -igure +#,# (ef# ,)

    -%&. 4.1 Tast

    as the cooking direction#

    30

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    31/119

    ombined ?athroom and ater loset (2+J,2)8 %n the "orthwest or est

    and ne!er be placed ne6t to the kitchen#

    ?edroom (3J+)8 /ead direction towards outh and bedroom location is

    outhwest

    1i!ing (3J+)8 %deal in the "orthwest direction

    Herandah8 ?est suited in the "orth# (ef# ,)

    -%&. 4.2 An#

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    32/119

    architectural space is man$made# .he space must be technicall& efficient and

    aestheticall& satisf&ing#

    >!er& space accommodates an acti!it& or a function* which decides the

    area and !olume re4uired# .he acti!ities determine the furniture re4uirements for

    the space#

    4.1.2.4 -NCTIONAL PLANNING AND CIRCLATION

    %dentif&ing the spatial re4uirements and ps&chological needs de!eloped

    in the functional program is a primar& element of the planning process that

    translates to an ownerKs spatial and ser!ice re4uirements for a building or facilit

    e& tasks in this process are8 problem definition or statement* establishing goals*

    collecting and anal&Bing facts* establishing functional relationships* and

    unco!ering and testing concepts# .here is also a need to design for fle6ibilit& of

    programmed space# successfull& designed building that functions properl& in

    all respects is composed of building s&stems* materials* and technologies that are

    selected and integrated to be mutuall& supporti!e as a cohesi!e whole s&stem#

    .he accessibilit& of circulation s&stems determines the o!er$all e6tent of

    access that can be attained in a buildingI therefore* these parts of buildings are

    gi!en high priorit& in code re!iews for barrier$free design#

    4.1.3 -INALISATION O- PLANS -OR DI--ERENT OCCPANCIES

    32

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    33/119

    4.1.3.1 PROPOSED PLAN -OR LIG WITH GRID LINES

    .he plan for 1%0 is shown in -igure +#3 with a carpet area of ' m 2#

    -%&. 4.3 P+an !'$ LIG D%;)n(%'n( a$) %nn)$ /%;)n(%'n( an/ a$) %n ;.

    4.1.3.2 PROPOSED PLAN -OR MIG WITH GRID LINES

    .he plan for M%0 is shown in -igure +#+ with a carpet area of m 2#

    33

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    34/119

    -%&. 4.4 P+an !'$ MIG D%;)n(%'n( a$) %nn)$ /%;)n(%'n( an/ a$) %n ;.

    4.1.3.3. PROPOSED PLAN -OR HIG WITH GRID LINES

    .he plan for /%0 is shown in -igure +#5 with a carpet area of ,5 m 2#

    34

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    35/119

    -%&. 4.5 P+an !'$ HIG D%;)n(%'n( a$) %nn)$ /%;)n(%'n( an/ a$) %n ;.

    4.2 ANALYSIS

    4.2.1 E(#%;a#%'n '! +'a/( !'$ #

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    36/119

    4.2.1.1 Loads for slabs

    elf weight of lab L concreteJbJD L wself

    1i!e 1oad (% 975 Part$2I Pg8 ) L 2

    kN

    m2

    -loor -inish L ,kN

    m2

    Design

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    37/119

    eight of slabL concJ ? J D J .

    eight of beamsL concJ ? J D J .

    eight of wallL masonr&J 1 J / J .

    elf weight L concJ 1 J ? J D

    4.2.1.4 Loads for footing

    1oad on the column L a6ial

    elf weight of footing L ,E (a6ial)

    .otal loadL a6ial N ,E (a6ial)

    4.2.2 G$%/%() /%(#$%#%'n '! (#$"#$a+ )+);)n#(

    37

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    38/119

    -%&. 4.6 ATOCAD +an (

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    39/119

    "umber of slab elements of dimensions 3 m J 5 m L + N 2

    "umber of beams of span 3 m L ' N 2

    "umber of beams of span 5 m L ' N 3

    "umber of columns L N 3

    4.2.2.3 Modular coordination applied to HIG housing

    "umber of slab elements of dimensions 3 m J 5 m L + N 2 N +

    "umber of beams of span 3 m L ' N 2 N +

    "umber of beams of span 5 m L ' N 3 N 3

    "umber of columns L N 3 N +

    4.3 DESIGNS

    4.3.1 In#$'/"#%'n

    .he t&pical structural elements are identified considering the -igure .he

    indentified elements are

    ,# -ooting

    2# olumn

    3# lab

    +# ?eams

    39

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    40/119

    .he loads on these elements are calculated considering the plan# .he

    re4uired data and other re4uirements for the design of structural elements are

    pro!ided then and there# ll the elements are checked for ade4uac& with respectto handling stresses which is uni4ue for prefab construction# %n the absence of

    codal pro!isions for joints* the recommended detailing of joints are followed#

    4.3.2 -'n/a#%'n

    -oundation is a sub$structure of a building which is alwa&s in contactwith soil* to transmit the super$structure load safel& to the subsoil* in such a wa&

    that the actual pressure on the soil below foundation should be less than the safe

    bearing capacit& of the soil#

    ccording to .erBaghi* if the depth of foundation is less than or e4ual to

    width of foundation* then such foundation is called shallow foundation# ?ut if the

    depth of foundation is greater than its width then the foundation is known as

    deep foundation#

    .&pes of hallow foundation8

    i# %solated foundation8 s4uare* rectangle* circle#

    ii# ombined foundation8 rectangle and trapeBoidal

    iii# trap footingi!# Mat or aft foundation

    .&pes of Deep foundation8

    40

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    41/119

    i# Pile foundation

    ii# Pier foundation

    iii# ell foundation

    i!# aisson

    4.3.2.1 Design procedure for isolated square footing

    S#)1>

    -ind out the depth of the foundation Dffrom the following formula8

    qs

    s[1sin1+sin

    ]2

    (+#,)

    here*

    DfL depth of foundation in meter

    4sL safe bearing capacit& of soil in kPa

    s L unit weight of soil inkN

    m3

    L internal angle of cohesion L 3o

    S#)2>

    -ind out the plan area

    41

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    42/119

    rea L L load

    qs

    (+#2)

    1oad L N f

    here*

    L load from column in k"

    fL self weight of foundation in k" L ,E of

    4sL safe bearing capacit& of soil inkN

    m3

    S#)3>

    -ind out the length and breadth of foundation#

    1 ? L rea Ofor rectangular foundation

    ? ? L rea Ofor s4uare foundation

    4d

    2 L rea Ofor circular foundation

    S#)4>

    -ind out ma6imum bending moment at the face of column

    S#)5>

    -ind out the thickness of footing from the following formula#

    42

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    43/119

    Mu* limitL #,39fckbd2 (+#3)

    here*

    Mu*limitL ma6imum bending moment in k"$m

    fckL characteristic strength of concrete in

    N

    mm2

    b L width of the section

    d L effecti!e depth

    S#)6>

    -ind out area of tension steel from following formula8

    u,limit= .87 fyA std [1 fyA stfckbd]M

    (+#+)

    here*

    Mu*limitL ma6imum bending moment in k"$m

    f&L &ield strength of steel in MPa

    d L effecti!e depth

    stL area of tension steel

    S#),>

    .he footing must be checked for one wa& shear# ccording to %$+5'82* the critical

    section for one wa& shear will take place at a distance QdA from one face of column#

    here*

    43

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    44/119

    d L effecti!e depth of foundation

    S#)>

    .he section must be checked for two wa& shear# ccording to %$+5'82* the critical

    section for two wa& shear will occur at a distance d

    2

    from all faces of column#

    S#)7>

    .he footing must be checked for load at the base of column

    c*br L

    wcol

    A g 0.45 fck

    A1

    A2

    here*

    c*br L bearing stress

    wcolL load on column

    gL gross area of column

    fckL characteristic compressi!e strength of concrete in MPa

    A

    1

    A2

    L 2 (?& %8 +5'82)

    S#) 18>

    44

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    45/119

    pacing of main reinforcementsL 0.785main2

    A st b

    pacing of trans!erse reinforcementL 0.785transvrs2

    A st, main b

    4.3.2.2 Design calculations

    Da#a>

    , ? of soil L 2 kPa

    2 D)#)$;%na#%'n '! +an a$)a

    45

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    46/119

    rea L L

    load

    qs

    L

    !+!fqs

    L258+0.1258

    200

    L ,#+, m2

    S#) 3> D)#)$;%na#%'n '! %/#< '! !'n/a#%'n

    ssuming a s4uare footing8

    idth of the s4uare footing L ? L A L 1.419 L ,#, m

    1ets us assume the width of the footing L ,#2 m

    /ence* we ha!e to pro!ide a s4uare footing of siBe ,#2 m 1.2

    m

    S#) 4> D)#)$;%na#%'n '! ;a0%;; )n/%n& ;';)n#

    Ma6imum bending moment Lw a

    2

    2

    here*

    wL upward soil pressure inkNm

    a=

    "

    2

    b

    2

    46

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    47/119

    ?L width of foundation L ,#2 m

    ? L width of column L 3 mm L #3 m

    w L

    load

    column[ #lanara ]

    J ?

    L[258

    1.22]

    J ,#2

    L 2,5

    kN

    m

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    48/119

    u=.87 fyA std [1fyA stfckbd]M

    32#'5 106

    L .87415 A st175 [1 415A st201200175 ]

    -rom the abo!e e4uation8Ast L 5+'#22 mm2

    A st,min=.0012(b $)

    .0012(1200230) L 33,#2 mm2

    /ence*A st>A st,min

    S#) ,> C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    49/119

    -%&. 4.6 C$%#%"a+ ()"#%'n !'$ 'n) a* (

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    50/119

    !

    k c

    -rom % +5'8 2* table number ,8

    #rcntagof tnsionstl=#=100Ast

    bd L #2'

    -or*

    p L #2' andfck L 2 MPa

    c=.36 MPa

    k=1

    /ence*

    !(k c )

    .he depth chosen is not ade4uate as per one wa& shear criteria and the depth has to be

    redesigned#

    [ 1.52581.22 ] [ .275d ] 1.2=.361.2 d

    -rom the abo!e e4uationI d L 27+ mm

    dopting the depth to be 3 mm

    S#) > C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    51/119

    -%&. 4. C$%#%"a+ ()"#%'n !'$ n"

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    52/119

    !Vksc

    /ence* the design is safe#

    S#) 7> C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    53/119

    ssuming 9 mm diameter bars* spacing L s L.785641200

    .00123561200 L ,,7#' mm ,

    mm

    /ence* 9 mm dia -e+,5 bars will be pro!ided X , mm c:c distance as trans!erse

    reinforcement#

    -%&.4.7 R)%n!'$");)n# /)#a%+( '! (@a$) !''#%n&

    53

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    54/119

    4.3.3 COLMN

    4.3.3.1 Introduction

    olumn is a !ertical compression member* whose main function is to transfer

    load from slabs and beams to the foundation#

    column is subjected to following stresses8

    %# Direct compression#

    %%# ompression as well as bending stress due to eccentric loading#

    T*)( '! "'+;n(>

    %# Pedestal8 column is said to be pedestal if its effecti!e length to breadth ratio is less than

    3#lff

    b

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    55/119

    %%# hort column8

    column is said to be short column when if its effecti!e length to breadth ratio is

    between 3 to ,2#

    %%%# 1ong column8

    column is said to be long column if its effecti!e length to breadth ratio is

    greater than ,2#

    4.3.3.2 Design procedure

    /ere* in this project we will adopt limit state method for design of columns as per %

    +5'82#

    .>P ,8 1oad calculations

    1oad on columnL P k"

    Design constant a) 0rade of concrete LM 2 b) 0rade of steel L -e +,5#

    1 L

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    56/119

    ,# %f both the ends are fi6ed then* 1effL #'5 J length of column#

    2# %f one end is fi6ed and another is pinned then 1effL #9 J length of column#

    3# %f one end is fi6ed and other end is free then 1effL 2 J length of column#

    +# %f both the ends are pinned then* 1effL ,# J length of column#

    %f lff

    b

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    57/119

    .>P 58 1ongitudinal reinforcements

    -rom scand g!alues* calculate number of bars#

    -or Z* number of barsL "

    .>P +8 hear reinforcements

    a) elect diameter of lateral ties least of ' mm or ,:+ diameter of the largest longitudinal

    bar not less than ,' mm diameter#

    b) pacing of lateral ties least of

    i) 1east lateral dimension of column

    ii) i6teen times the smallest diameter of bar

    iii) 3 mm

    .>P '8 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at (

    3

    offset from both edges#

    1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of columnL w

    heck for dimensions8

    "egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!erLwl

    2

    2

    Positi!e moment at mid spanL wl2

    8

    "et e6cess momentL Positi!e moment [ "egati!e moment

    Me6cessL #,39fckbd2

    d should be less than adopted depth* for safe condition#

    57

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    58/119

    heck for shear8

    HuL wu l

    2

    !L %

    bd

    -or !alues of ! and pt* refer table ,* %+5'$2I Pg8 73 to find the !alue of \c#

    \c should be less than !* for safe in shear#

    4.3.3.3 Interior column design

    .>P ,8 1oad calculations

    1oad on columnL ,2 k"#

    Design constant a) 0rade of concrete LM2 b) 0rade of steel L -e +,5#

    1 L P 38 .&pe of column

    58

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    59/119

    lff

    bL,9#' W ,2* hence long column#

    .>P +8 dditional moment due to buckling in long column

    Ma6 L Ma& L 'u $

    2000 ((ff$)

    2

    'u $

    2000 ((ff$)

    2

    L 9#+ k"$m

    PuBL #+5fckcN #75f&sc L 75,#+ k"

    'u

    'u) L #2* YnL ,

    Mu6 L Mu& L ,5#29 k"$m*

    Mu*, limMu*

    N

    Muy, limMuy

    L #59 V,# as per P,' Design ids

    .>P 58 1ongitudinal reinforcements

    scL ,# E gL '25 mm2

    -or Z L ,2 mm* number of bar L " L5#52' '

    .>P '8 hear reinforcements

    a) elect diameter of lateral ties least of

    ' mm or ,:+ diameter of the largest longitudinal bar not less than ,' mm diameter#

    59

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    60/119

    Diameter of the lateral ties : link L9 mm

    b) pacing of lateral ties : link least of

    i) 1east lateral dimension of column L25 mmii) i6teen times the smallest diameter of bar L ,'J,2L,2 mm and

    iii) 3 mm

    Pro!ide 9 mmZ X,5 mm c:c

    .>P 78 ummar& of design

    ,# olumn siBe8 25 J 25 mm2

    2# 1ongitudinal teel8 '],2

    3# 1ateral teel8 21]9 X,5 mm c:c

    .>P 98 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at (

    3

    m i#e# ,#55 m offset from both edges as shown in -igure

    +#,#

    -%&. 4.18 H'' $'=%(%'n %n "'+;n(

    1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of columnL ,#5'25kN

    m

    heck for dimensions8

    60

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    61/119

    "egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2

    2

    L

    1.56251.552

    2 L ,#97 k"$m

    Positi!e moment at mid span L wl2

    8

    L 1.56252.3252

    8

    L,#5 k"$

    m

    "et e6cess moment L #9,+ k"$m

    Me6cessL #,39fckbd2

    d L 3+#35 mm V ,7 mm* /ence chosen depth is safe

    heck for shear8

    HuL wu l

    2

    L 1.56251.15

    2

    Hu L #99 k"

    !L%u

    b dL 898

    250250L #,+

    N

    mm2

    ptL ,#

    (efer table ,* %+5'$2I Pg8 73)

    \c L #'2

    N

    mm2 W ! (#,+

    N

    mm2 )

    61

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    62/119

    /ence hear afe

    .hus column is safe for erection stresses too#

    -%&. 4.11 In#)$%'$ "'+;n /)#a%+(

    4.3.3.4 !terior column design

    .>P ,8 1oad calculations

    1oad on columnL ,72 k"#

    Design constant a) 0rade of concrete LM 2 b) 0rade of steel L -e +,5#

    62

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    63/119

    1 L

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    64/119

    Mu6 L Mu& L ,#2 k"$m*

    Mu*, lim

    Mu*

    N

    Muy, lim

    Muy

    L #7 V ,# as per P,' Design ids

    .>P 58 1ongitudinal reinforcements

    scL ,# E gL mm2

    -or Z L ,2 mm* number of bars L " L 9

    Pro!ide 9],2 as longitudinal steel#

    .>P '8 hear reinforcements

    a) elect diameter of lateral ties least of

    ' mm or ,:+ diameter of the largest longitudinal bar not less than ,' mm diameter#

    Diameter of the lateral ties : link L9 mm

    b) pacing of lateral ties : link 1east of

    i) 1east lateral dimension of column L 3 mm

    ii) i6teen times the smallest diameter of bar L ,'J,2 L ,2 mm and

    iii) 3 mm

    Pro!ide 21]9 X,5 mm c:c

    .>P 78 ummar& of design

    ,# olumn siBe8 3J3 mm2

    2# 1ongitudinal teel8 9],2

    3# 1ateral teel8 21]9 X,5 mm c:c

    .>P 98 heck for erection stresses

    64

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    65/119

    /ooks are pro!ided at (

    3

    m i#e# ,#55m offset from both edges#

    1oad on beam due to erection L self weight of column L 2#25kN

    m

    heck for dimensions8

    "egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2

    2

    L 2.251.552

    2

    L 2#7 k"$m

    Positi!e moment at mid spanL wl2

    8

    L 2.252.3252

    8

    L ,#529 k"$m

    "et e6cess moment L ,#,9 k"$m

    Me6cessL #,39fckbd2

    d L 37#75 mm V 2, mm* /ence chosen depth is safe

    heck for shear8

    HuL wu l

    2

    L 2.251.15

    2

    Hu L ,#2 k"

    !L%u

    b dL #,+

    N

    mm2

    ptL ,#

    65

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    66/119

    (efer table ,* %+5'$2I Pg8 73)

    \c L #'2

    N

    mm2

    W ! (#,+

    N

    mm2

    )

    /ence hear afe

    .hus column is safe for erection stresses too#

    -%&. 4.12 E0#)$%'$ "'+;n /)#a%+(

    4.3.4 BEAM

    66

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    67/119

    4.3.4.1 Introduction

    beam is a structural element that is capable of withstanding load primaril& b&

    resisting bending# .he bending force is induced into the material of the beam as a result

    of the e6ternal loads* own weight* span and e6ternal reactions to these loads#

    ?eams are generall& described b& how the& are supported# upports restrict

    lateral and:or rotational mo!ements so as to satisf& stabilit& conditions as well as to limit

    the deformations to a certain allowance# simple beam is supported b& a pin support at

    one end and a roller support at the other end# beam with a laterall& and rotationall&fi6ed support at one end with no support at the other end is called a cantile!er beam#

    beam simpl& supported at two points and ha!ing one end or both ends e6tended be&ond

    the supports is called an o!erhanging beam#

    4.3.4.2 D)(%&n $'")/$) !'$ /)(%&n '! a )a;

    .>P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth

    dL(

    "asic valu for vrtical dflction limit as #r +456: 2000- 'ag37

    DLdN effecti!e co!er

    b L $2

    .>P 28 1oad calculations

    elf weight wself L concJ b J D

    67

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    68/119

    eight of brick masonr& wall if supported o!er it wwall L masonr&J l J t

    1i!e load as per % 975(Part 2)8,97 L wli!e

    .otal 1oad L wselfNwwallNwli!e

    -actored 1oadL uL J,#5

    .>P 38 Moment calculations

    Mu L !u lff2

    8

    Mu*limL #,39fckbd2

    I! MM+%;a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).

    .>P +8 einforcement details

    MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$A

    st f

    y

    b d f ck)

    stis calculated from abo!e formula

    st* minimumL .85

    fy

    Jb J D

    -or st* calWst* min or st* calVst* min

    dopt ^ diameter bars#

    68

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    69/119

    "umber of bars L

    ara of on A st , calA st , min w . ic . vr gratr

    -or higher depth beams side face reinforcement are pro!ided for st*face L #,E of bwJdw

    .>P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force Hu L wu l

    2

    "ominal shear stress L %u

    b d

    Permissible hear trength of concrete is referred from .able , % +5' using M 2 and

    st!alue#

    %f "ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stressL Permissible hear trength#

    %f "ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stress#

    HusL 0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    s!is found from abo!e formula#

    -or the selected stirrup* its area should alwa&s be greater than s!#

    .>P '8 heck for deflection

    69

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    70/119

    ?asic (

    d

    L 2

    -or pt find ktreferring %+5'$2* Pg8 39

    Ma6 W ctual

    %f ?asic J ktWctual then the beam is safe in deflection#

    .>P 78 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at #3m offset from both edges#

    1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beam

    C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    71/119

    dL (

    15

    L 3000

    15

    L 2mm

    DLdNeffecti!e co!erL 2N3L 23mm

    b L,5mm

    .>P 28 1oad calculations

    elf weightL concJ b J D L 25J#,5J#23 L #9'25kN

    m

    eight of brick masonr& wall abo!e plinth L masonr&J l J t L,J2#'J#,5 L 7#+,kN

    m

    .otal 1oadL 9#27kN

    m

    -actored 1oadL ,#5J9#27L,2#+[LkN

    m

    .>P 38 Moment calculations

    MuL !u lff2

    30

    L 1332

    30

    L 3# k"$m (based on elastic foundation)

    Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L ,'#5' k"$m

    MM+%;H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).

    .>P +8 einforcement details

    71

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    72/119

    MuL #97Jf&JstJd (,$ A st fy

    b d f ck

    )

    stL5' mm2

    st* minimumL &85

    fy

    Jb J D L .85

    415

    J,5J23 L 7#'' mm2

    st* calVst* min

    dopt 9mm diameter bars#

    "umber of bars L 2

    H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force HuL wu l

    2

    L 133

    2

    L ,#5 k"

    "ominal shear stress L %u

    b d

    L 19500

    150200

    L #'5 N

    mm2

    Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M2 and st L ,5#72

    mm2* \c L#3

    N

    mm2

    "ominal shear stress W Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stress#

    72

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    73/119

    HusL 0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    ,5 L 0.87415 A sv 200

    300

    s!L 9,#, mm2

    -or a two legged 9 mm diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+L,#+9 mm 2 W s!

    H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF388 ;; "9" !'$ (P 78 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at #3m offset from both edges#

    1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beam L #9'25kN

    m

    73

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    74/119

    C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    75/119

    .>P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth

    dL (

    20

    L 5000

    20

    L 25 mm

    DLdNeffecti!e co!erL 25N3L 29 mm

    b L,5mm

    .>P 28 1oad calculations

    elf weightL concJ b J DL 25J#,5 J #29 L ,#5

    kN

    m

    eight of brick masonr& wall abo!e plinth L masonr&J l J tL , J 2#' J #,5L 7#+,kN

    m

    .otal 1oadL 9#+'kN

    m

    -actored 1oadL ,#5J9#+'L,3kNm

    .>P 38 Moment calculations

    MuL !u lff2

    30

    L !u lff2

    30

    L ,#933 k"$m (based on elastic

    foundation)

    Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L 25#975 k"$m

    MM+%; H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).

    75

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    76/119

    .>P +8 einforcement details

    MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy

    b d f ck

    )

    stL ,2#22 mm2

    st* minimumL .85

    fy

    Jb J D L .85

    415

    J,5J29 L 9'#2 mm2

    st* cal

    Wst* min

    dopt , mm diameter bars#

    "umber of barsL 3

    H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y18 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force HuL wu l2

    L 1352

    L 32#5 k"

    "ominal shear stressL %u

    b d

    L 32500

    150250

    L #97 N

    mm2

    Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M 2 and stL 235#5

    mm2*\cL#5N

    mm2

    "ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stress#

    76

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    77/119

    HusL

    0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    325 L 0.87415 A sv 250

    300

    s!L ,9#, mm2

    -or a two legged , mm diameter stirrup* 2J79#5L,57 mm 2 Ws!

    H)n") $'=%/) 2LY18F388 ;; "9" !'$ (

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    78/119

    -%& 4.14 H'' $'=%(%'n %n )a;(

    C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    79/119

    -%&. 4.15 D)#a%+( '! P+%n#< )a; P 28 1oad calculations

    elf weightL concJ b J DL 25J#,5J#3 L,#,25kN

    m

    79

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    80/119

    Dead weight of slabL concJ b J D L 25J,J#,+ L 3#5kN

    m

    1i!e 1oad L 2kN

    m

    -loor -inish L ,kN

    m

    .otal 1oad L 7#'25kN

    m

    -actored 1oadL ,#5J7#'25L ,,#5kN

    m

    .>P 38 Moment calculations

    MuL !u lff2

    8

    L 11.532

    8

    L ,2#+ k"$m

    Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L 2#7 k"$m

    MM+%;H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).

    .>P +8 einforcement details

    MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy

    b d f ck

    )

    stL,3'#7 mm2

    80

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    81/119

    st* minimumL &85

    fy

    Jb J D L .85

    415

    J,5J3 L 2#,7 mm2

    st* calWst* min

    dopt , mm diameter bars#

    "umber of barsL 2

    H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y18 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force HuL wu l

    214

    L 11.53

    2

    L ,7#25 k"

    "ominal shear stressL %u

    b d

    L 17250

    150265

    L #+3 N

    mm2

    Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M2 and stL235#5

    mm2* \cL#5N

    mm2

    "ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* still nominal stirrups are pro!ided for

    "ominal shear stressL Permissible hear trength#

    81

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    82/119

    HusL 0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    ,725 L 0.87415 A sv 265

    300

    s!L 5+# mm2

    -or a two legged 9 diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+ L ,#+9 mm2 Ws!

    H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF 388 ;; "9" a( (P 78 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at #3m offset from both edges#

    1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beamL ,#,25kN

    m

    C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    83/119

    "egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2

    2

    L 1.1250.32

    2

    L #5 k"$m

    Positi!e moment at mid spanL wl2

    8

    L 1.1252.42

    8

    L #9, k"$m

    "et e6cess momentL #7' k"$m

    Me6cess(#7' k"$m) VMu*member(2#7 k"$m)

    H)n") "

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    84/119

    .>P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth

    dL (

    15

    L 5000

    15

    L 333#33 mm

    DLdNeffecti!e co!erL 333#33N35L 3'9#33 mm[L 37 mm* dL335 mm

    bL D:2L 37:2L,95[L 2 mm

    .>P 28 1oad calculations

    elf weightL concJ b J D L 25J#2J#37 L ,#95

    kN

    m

    Dead weight of slabL concJ b J D L 25J,J#,+ L 3#5kN

    m

    1i!e 1oad L2kN

    m

    -loor -inish L ,kNm

    .otal 1oad L 9#35kN

    m

    -actored 1oadL ,#5J9#35L,2#52[L,3kN

    m

    .>P 38 Moment calculations

    MuL !u lff2

    8

    L 1352

    8

    L +#'25 k"$m

    84

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    85/119

    Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L ',#5 k"$m

    MM+%; H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).

    .>P +8 einforcement details

    MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy

    b d f ck

    )

    stL 3+3#,7 mm2

    st* minimumL .85

    fy

    Jb J D L .85

    415

    J2J335 L ,37#23 mm2

    st* calWst* min

    dopt ,2mm diameter bars#

    "umber of bars L 3

    H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y12 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force HuL wu l

    2

    L 135

    2

    L 32#5 k"

    85

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    86/119

    "ominal shear stressL %u

    b d

    L 32500

    200335

    L #+95 N

    mm2

    Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M 2 and stL3+3#,7

    mm2* \cL#3N

    mm2

    "ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stress#

    HusL 0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    325 L 0.87415 A sv 335

    300

    s!L9#', mm2

    -or a two legged 9 diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+L,#+9 mm2Ws!

    H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF388 ;; "9" a( (

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    87/119

    24 14.73

    H)n") D)!+)"#%'n %( Sa!).

    .>P 78 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at #3m offset from both edges#

    1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beamL ,#95kN

    m

    C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    88/119

    -%&. 4.1, D)#a%+( '! Ma%n )a; P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth

    dL (20

    L 300020

    L ,5 mm

    DLdNeffecti!e co!erL ,5N3 L ,9 mm

    b L,5 mm

    .>P 28 1oad calculations

    elf weightL concJ b J DL 25J#,5 J #,9L#'75kNm

    88

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    89/119

    eight of brick masonr& wall abo!e plinth L masonr&J l J tL , J ,#55 J #,5L +#+2

    kN

    m

    .otal 1oadL 5#,kN

    m

    -actored 1oadL uL,#5J5#,L7#'5[L9kN

    m

    .>P 38 Moment calculations

    MuL !u lff2

    8

    L 832

    8

    L k"$m

    Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L #3,5 k"$m

    MM+%;H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).

    .>P +8 einforcement details

    MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy

    b d f ck

    )

    stL2+#99mm2

    st* minimumL .85

    fy

    Jb J D L .85

    415

    J,5J,9 L 55#3 mm2

    st* calWst* min

    dopt ,mm diameter bars#

    89

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    90/119

    "umber of bars L 3

    H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y18 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force HuL wu l

    2

    L 83

    2

    L ,2 k"

    "ominal shear stressL %u

    b d

    L 12000

    150150

    L #53 N

    mm2

    Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M2 and stL235#5

    mm2 *\cL #3N

    mm2

    "ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stressL Permissible hear trength#

    HusL 0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    ,2 L 0.87415 A sv 150

    300

    s!L9,#, mm2

    -or a two legged 9 diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+L,#+9 mm2Ws!

    H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF388 ;; "9" !'$ (

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    91/119

    .>P '8 heck for deflection

    ?asic (

    d

    L 2

    -or pt L #972* (%+5'$2* Pg8 39)

    ktL ,#,

    2J,#, W 2

    22 28

    H)n") D)!+)"#%'n %( Sa!).

    .>P 78 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at #3 m offset from both edges#

    1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beamL #'75kN

    m

    C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    92/119

    H)n") "P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth

    dL (

    20

    L 3000

    20

    L 25 mm

    DLdNeffecti!e co!erL 25N3L 29 mm

    b L,5 mm

    .>P 28 1oad calculations

    92

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    93/119

    elf weightL concJ b J DL 25J#,5 J #29L,#5kN

    m

    eight of brick masonr& wall abo!e plinth L masonr&J l J tL , J ,#55 J #,5L +#+2

    kN

    m

    .otal 1oadL 5#+7kN

    m

    -actored 1oadL ,#5J5#+7L 9#2kNm

    .>P 38 Moment calculations

    MuL !u lff2

    8

    L 8.252

    8

    L 25#'25 k"$m

    Mu*limL #,39fckbd2

    L 25#975 k"$m

    MM+%;H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).

    .>P +8 einforcement details

    MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy

    b d f ck

    )

    stL352#7+ mm2

    st* minimumL .85

    fy

    Jb J D L .85

    415

    J,5J 29 L 9'#2 mm2

    93

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    94/119

    st* calWst* min

    dopt ,mm diameter bars#

    "umberof barsL 352#7+:79#5L+#+[L5

    H)n") $'=%/%n& 2Y183Y18 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force HuL wu l

    2

    L 8.25

    2

    L 2#5 k"

    "ominal shear stressL %u

    b d

    L 20500

    150250

    L #55 N

    mm2

    Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M2 and stL32#5

    mm2*\cL#'2

    N

    mm2

    >!en though "ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for

    "ominal shear stressL Permissible hear trength#

    HusL 0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    25 L 0.87415 A sv 250

    300

    s!L '9#,3 mm2

    -or a two legged 9 diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+L ,#+9 mm2 Ws!

    94

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    95/119

    H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF388 ;; "9" !'$ (P 78 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at #3 m offset from both edges#

    1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beamL ,#5

    kN

    m

    C

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    96/119

    Me6cess(2#++ k"$m) VMu*member(25#975 k"$m)

    H)n") "

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    97/119

    eight of the beam to rest upon it L wbeam

    .otal load uL wselfN wbeam

    .>P 38 Moment calculation

    MuL !u lff2

    2

    Mu*limL #,39fckbd2

    I! MM+%; a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).

    .>P +8 einforcement details

    st* minimumL #2EJbJD

    dopt ^ diameter bars#

    "umber of bars Lara of on

    A st ,min

    .>P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force HuL !u l

    2

    "ominal shear stressL %u

    b d

    Permissible hear trength of concrete is referred from .able , % +5'82 using M

    2 and st!alue#

    97

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    98/119

    %f "ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stressL Permissible hear trength#

    %f "ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stress#

    HusL 0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    s!is found from abo!e formula#

    -or the selected stirrup* its area should alwa&s be greater than s!#

    .>P '8 heck for bearing stresses

    _br*calculatedL !bam

    b l

    _br*limitL

    fck

    / & o & s * where -#=## is assumed to be 2#

    %f _br*calculatedW _br*limitthen the adopted dimensions of the corbel are safe#

    4.3.%.2 Design

    .>P ,8 dopt preliminar& dimensions

    bL #3 m

    lL #5 m

    98

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    99/119

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    100/119

    "umber of barsL 101. 38

    78.5

    [L3

    H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y18 a( #' #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( '##'; P 58 Design of stirrups

    hear force HuL !u l

    2

    L 6.150.3

    2

    L #2 k"

    "ominal shear stressL %u

    b d

    L 920

    300300

    L #, N

    mm2

    Permissible hear trength of concrete is referred from .able , % +5' using M 2 and

    stL 235#5 mm2* \cL #22

    N

    mm2

    "ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal

    shear stressL Permissible hear trength#

    HusL 0.87 fy A sv d

    v

    s!L 5+#9+ mm2

    /ence pro!iding 21]9 as stirrups Ws!

    .>P '8 heck for bearing stresses

    _br*calculatedL!bam

    b lL

    1850000

    300500L ,2#33

    N

    mm2

    100

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    101/119

    _br*limitL fck

    / & o & s

    L 20

    2

    L , N

    mm2

    ince_br*calculated(,2#33N

    mm2 ) W _br*limit(,

    N

    mm2 )* the adopted dimensions of the

    corbel are safe#

    -%&. 4.28 C'$)+ /)#a%+(

    4.3.6 S+a

    101

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    102/119

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    103/119

    .>P 28 >ffecti!e depth of slab

    pan:depth ratio L 29

    >ffecti!e depth Ls#an

    28

    Pro!ide effecti!e co!er of 2 mm#

    -ind o!er all depth#

    .>P 38 1oads

    elf weight of lab LconcreteJbJD L wself

    1i!e 1oad (% 975 Part$2I Pg8 ) L 2kN

    m2

    -loor -inish L ,

    kN

    m2

    Design P +8

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    104/119

    "o "egati!e Moment due to absence of continuous edges#

    Positi!e at Mid @ pan

    Y& L efer %+5' @ 2I Pg8 , .able 2'

    .>P 58 heck for depth

    Mu#limL #,39fckbd2

    .>P '8 einforcement (short ; long span)

    Min# stL#,2E of 0ross area of cross section

    Positi!e at mid span

    MuL #97 f& st d

    -ind st#

    pacing should least of the following

    ,# 3d

    2# 3 mm

    Pro!ide distribution steel as per minimum steel#

    .>P 78 heck for shear

    onsidering the short span unit width of slab#

    hear force Hu L wu l*

    2

    104

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    105/119

    "ominal shear stress L %u

    b d

    efer table ,* % +5'82I Page8 73 for !alue of \c

    %f \c W!* the slab is safe in shear#

    .>P 98 heck for deflection

    ?asic (

    dL 2

    ktL (% +5'82* Page8 39)

    Ma6 W ctual

    %f ?asic J ktW actual then safe in deflection#

    .>P 8 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at , m offset from edge in longer span and #5 m offset from edge inshorter span* at all four corners of slab#

    1oad on slab due to erectionL self weight of slab

    heck for dimensions8

    "egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2

    2

    Positi!e moment at mid span L wl2

    8

    "et e6cess momentL "egati!e Moment[Positi!e Moment

    105

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    106/119

    %f Me6cessVMu*member then chosen dimensions are safe for erection stresses too#

    4.3.&.3 Design

    .>P ,8 .o determine the t&pe of slab

    16L 3 m

    1&L 5 m

    fckL 2

    N

    mm2

    f& L +,5

    N

    mm2

    1&:16L ,#''7V 2 (.= ] 1?)

    >nd condition L -our edges discontinuous

    .>P 28 >ffecti!e depth of slab

    pan:depth ratio L 29

    >ffecti!e depth L ,7#,+ mm

    Pro!ide effecti!e depth of ,2 mm* effecti!e co!er of 2 mm#

    =!er all depth is ,+ mm

    .>P 38 1oads

    106

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    107/119

    elf weight of lab LconcreteJbJD L25J,J#,+L 3#5

    kN

    m2

    1i!e 1oad (% 975 Part$2I Pg8 ) L 2kN

    m2

    -loor -inish L ,

    kN

    m2

    .otal load L '#5

    kN

    m2

    Design

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    108/119

    b) 1ong direction

    "o "egati!e Moment due to absence of continuous edges#

    Positi!e at Mid @ pan

    Y& L #5'

    M L #5' J , J 52

    ML ,+ k"$m

    .>P 58 heck for depth

    Mu#limL #,39fckbd2

    d L 7,#22 mm V ,2 mm* /ence chosen depth is safe#

    .>P '8 einforcement (short ; long span)

    Min# stL#,2E of 0ross area of cross sectionL ,'9 mm2

    Positi!e at mid span

    MuL #97 f& st d

    ,+ J ,'L #97 J+,5 Jst J ,2

    stL 323#,3 mm2

    pacing should least of the following

    ,# 3d L 3(,2) L3' mm2# 3 mm

    st(pro)L32#7 mm2

    P$'=%/) 18 ;; /%a;)#)$ a$( F 288 ;; "9" a( ;a%n (#))+.

    108

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    109/119

    Distribution steel

    s per minimum steel*

    stL ,'9 mm2

    P$'=%/) ;; /%a;)#)$ a$( F 388 ;; "9" a( /%(#$%#%'n (#))+.

    .>P 78 heck for shear

    onsidering the short span unit width of slab#

    hear force Hu

    Lw

    u

    l*

    2L

    103

    2 L ,5 k"

    "ominal shear stress L %u

    b d

    L 15000

    1000120

    L #,7 N

    mm2

    ptL #29

    (efer table ,* % +5'82I Page8 73)

    \c L #3N

    mm2 W ! (#,7

    N

    mm2 )

    /ence hear afe

    .>P 98 heck for deflection

    ?asic (

    dL 2

    109

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    110/119

    -or pt L #29* (% +5'82* Page8 39)

    ktL ,#2

    Ma6 W ctual

    ?asic J ktW2,#+2

    2J,#2 W 2,#+2

    2+ W 2,#+2

    /ence* safe in deflection#

    .>P 8 heck for erection stresses

    /ooks are pro!ided at , m offset from edge in longer span and #5 m offset from edge in

    shorter span* at all four corners of slab as shown in -igure +#2,#

    -%&. 4.21 H'' $'=%(%'n %n (+a(

    110

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    111/119

    1oad on slab due to erectionL self weight of slabL 52#5kN

    m

    heck for dimensions8

    "egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2

    2

    L 52.50.52

    2

    L'#5' k"$m

    Positi!e moment at mid span wl

    2

    8

    L 52.522

    8

    L2'#25 k"$m

    "et e6cess momentL ,#' k"$m

    Me6cess(,#' k"$m) VMu*member(3#7++ k"$m)

    H)n") "

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    112/119

    4.3.'.1 Introduction

    onnections are among the most essential parts in precast structures#

    .heir performance relates to the structural limit states* as well as to manufacture*

    erection and maintenance of the structure itself# Proper design of connections is one

    major ke& to a successful prefabrication#

    .he main purpose of the structural connections is to transfer forces

    between the precast concrete elements in order to obtain a structural interaction

    when the s&stem is loaded#

    ?& the abilit& to transfer forces* the connections should secure the

    intended structural beha!ior of the superstructure and the precast subs&stems that are

    integrated in it#

    .his could for instance be to establish diaphragm action in precast floors

    and walls* or cantile!er action in precast shafts# -or this reason the structural

    connections should be regarded as essential and integrated parts of the structural

    s&stem and the& should be designed accordingl& and with the same care as for the

    precast concrete elements# %t is insufficient just to consider the connections as details

    for site erection#

    .he ad!antages that normall& are obtainable with prefabrication can be

    lost with an inappropriate design and detailing of the structural connections#

    112

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    113/119

    .he general guidelines to be followed for effecti!e joints and

    connections are8

    %n foundation to column joints* the infill should be prepared with the use of

    e6pansi!e cements so that no ca!it& formation takes place after h&dration#

    ontinuit& bars should e6tend be&ond both the edges of the e6terior slab#

    Dowels bars should e6tend be&ond the column and beam joint to both of the

    sides#

    ?eams should not be casted completel& to lea!e pro!ision for e6tended

    stirrups to be casted along with slabs for effecti!e connections between the

    components#

    4.3.'.2 )loor *o #eam +onnections

    Details of t&pical bearing of a floor unit o!er the precast beam are shown

    in -igure +#23 the stirrups of the precast beams are protruded and function as shear

    connectors#

    113

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    114/119

    -%&. 4.23 -+''$ #' )a; "'nn)"#%'n(

    4.3.'.3 #eam to column connections

    .he bracket support for the beam o!er the column is shown in -igure 2#

    tolerance of 2$3 cm is allowed at the seating of the beam o!er the bracket#

    dowel bar inserted through the holes pro!ided in the bracket and the beam

    ensures an effecti!e connection between them#

    .he top reinforcing bars of the precast beams are connected to thecolumn

    joint b& welding# ince onl& a few number of bars are welded* it is assumed

    that the connection between the beam and the column is a rigid one at the

    ser!iceabilit& stage* but beha!es as a hinged one at the ultimate stage

    114

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    115/119

    -%&. 4.24 B)a; #' "'+;n "'nn)"#%'n

    4.3.'.4 )oundation to column connections

    .he foundations usuall& cast as in$situ isolated footings as the local soil

    conditions warrant#

    115

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    116/119

    .he bottom end of the precast column is connected to the foundation as shown in

    -igure +#2+#

    -%&. 4.25 C'+;n #' !''#%n& "'nn)"#%'n

    4.3.'.% "roduction and erection

    116

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    117/119

    .he method of production depends on the total number of prefabricated

    elements that are to be produced# .he components ma& be produced either in a factor&

    on mass scale or in casting &ards located near the site and e4uipped with the necessar&plant and machiner

    -or facilitating erection* lifting hooks are pro!ided in the precast floors and

    beams# >rection e&es as pro!ided in the structural elements help in lifting them during

    transportation and erection using temporar& bracing# .he hooks ha!e a t&pical design as

    shown in -igure +#2+#

    -%&. 4.26 H'' /)#a%+%n& !'$ #$an('$#a#%'n an/ )$)"#%'n

    117

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    118/119

    CHAPTER 5

    CONCLSION

    5.1 CONCLSION

    .he project successfull& completes the design of modular houses using ad!anced

    technolog& and a solution to 4uicker construction with economic ad!antages#

    ompletion of the project has finall& helped in gaining !ital and practical

    implementations in accordance with safet& and ser!iceabilit& of the designed

    units#

    5.2 -TRE SCOPE O- THE PROJECT

    .he implementation of the project will be of a great help to the rising need of

    4uicker construction and in the field of mass housing techni4ues#

    %t will be a boon for the weaker sections of societ& where owning a house is still

    a common dream and the economic ad!antage of the project would be effecti!el&

    implemented#

    118

  • 7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale

    119/119

    Pro!isions for e6tension of plan for other suitabilit& issues is also included for

    satisf&ing different functional needs#