report 1 finale
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
1/119
CHAPTER 1
OVERVIEW
1.1 OBJECTIVE
Design of prefabricated modular housing for different occupancies for the
inhabitants (about 5327 households) displaced due to the implementation of the
Pancheshwar Power Project on Mahakali i!er ("epal)#
1.2 NECESSITY
Pancheshwar Power Project is proposed as a "epal$%ndia bi$national scheme
on the Mahakali i!er with a capacit& of '72 M# ith its implementation* a total of
+,*33 persons from 5327 households ha!e been displaced for which rehabilitation
works ha!e to be completed b& 2,2$2,3 but as for now the progress is too slow to
reach the deadline#
-or faster construction and as an approach to affordable homes* it is
proposed to pro!ide a solution to mass housing using modular coordination method#
1.3 SCOPE
.he project en!isages selection of a suitable plan as per modular
coordination and use of building architecture for proper functioning and orientation of
the building#
1
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
2/119
.he houses are proposed to be classified on the basis of income groups (i#e#
/igh %ncome 0roup* Medium %ncome 0roup and 1ow %ncome 0roup) which will thendecide the corresponding plan areas#
1.4 METHODOLOGY
election of a realistic site#
uggestion of a suitable plan for mass housing with grid dimensions#
election of t&pe of precast structural s&stem#
ollection of necessar& data and codal pro!isions as per re4uired for the
project#
election of t&pe of connection to be emplo&ed#
Design of structural precast members#
doption of t&pical joints and connections between precast and in$situ
members#
%nstallation of the members as per design plan.
Pro!ision for grid wise e6tension of the designed plan#
1.5 MAJOR DESIGN EXPERIENCE
1. Planning and la&out using modular coordination for different occupancies#
2. 0rid wise distribution of plan#
3. Design of connections between indi!idual precast members#
4. Design of structural and non$ structural precast members#
1.6 REALISTIC DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
2
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
3/119
1. Man!a"#$%n& "'n(#$a%n#(
.he functional plan and the construction technolog& shall ensure that the
project can be implemented in the shortest possible time with acceptable4ualit
2. Sa!)#* "'n(#$a%n#(
.he design of all joints between prefabricated components shall meet the
accepted procedures#
3. S'"%a+ "'n(#$a%n#(
.he compulsion to pro!ide housing for people belonging to different strata in
societ& within the shortest possible time due to mass displacement#
1., RE-ERENCE TO CODES AND STANDARDS
Ta+) 1.1 R)!)$)n") #' "'/)( an/ (#an/a$/(.
C'/)( C'n#)0#
% ,278 ,92
ode for practice for design and construction of floors and roof
using precast reinforced: prestressed concrete#
% +5'8 2
Plain and einforced oncrete $ ode of Practice
1imit state design method* Material stresses* Design
coefficients#
% 3358,''ode of Practice for omposite onstruction
% 9758 ,97
Part (,;2)
Design loads for buildings and structures (Dead load ;
%mposed load)#
1. APPLICATION O- EARLIER CORSE WOR
3
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
4/119
Ta+) 1.2 A+%"a#%'n '! )a$+%)$ "'$() '$(
1.7
M
LTIDISCIPLINARY COMPONENT AND TEAM WOR
.his project in!ol!es in interacting with the go!ernment officials of the
Pancheshwar Project for getting necessar& data#
1.18 SO-TWARE9E:IPMENT SED
ngineering Design of foundation
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
5/119
2. ompletion of the project will finall& help in gaining !ital and practical
implementations in accordance with safet& and ser!iceabilit& of the designed
units#
1.12 -TRE SCOPE O- THE PROJECT
.he implementation of the project will be of a great help to the rising need
of 4uicker construction and in the field of mass housing techni4ues#
%t will be a boon for the weaker sections of societ& where owning a house is
still a common dream and the economic ad!antage of the project would be
effecti!el& implemented#
Pro!isions for e6tension of plan for other suitabilit& issues is also included
for satisf&ing different functional needs#
5
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
6/119
CHAPTER 2
INTRODCTION
2.1 GENERAL
s a ci!il engineer* one should be familiar with all the aspects of ci!il
engineering practices be it housing* industrial* roads* airports* docks and harbors* dams*
transmission line towers an other h&draulic structures together with power plant
structures# .he curriculum for ci!il engineering* which has been e6posed all these four
&ears* has dealt with the rudiments of the abo!e subjects in our curriculum# %n order to
ha!e hands on e6perience with respect to designing a project* in which the design of
## structural elements is in!ol!ed* is taken#
2.2 LITERATRE REVIEW
.he basic principle of prefabrication* whereb& a home is prefabricated in one
location and then deli!ered to another* has been around for at least a few hundred &ears#
.he most widel& cited benefit of prefab is econom& of scale* as components or entire
homes can be produced in large 4uantities# ?ut this is not a prere4uisite for success#
.hereAs !alue in faster project schedules* fewer weather dela&s* and more efficient use of
materials thanks to optimiBation and 4ualit& control# =ne of the primar& benefits for the
bu&er is predictabilit&8 Predefined design details and construction processes gi!e the
client a degree of suret& about the outcome that is often absent in custom projects#
2.2.1 P$)()n# (")na$%' a$'n/ #
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
7/119
?etween ,9 and ,+* ears* oebuck* and ompan& sold o!er 7*
prefabricated house kits b& mail to enterprising do$it$&ourselfers across "orth merica#
.hese read&$to$assemble homes featured precut wooden components cross$referenced toa blueprint# .hanks to robust engineering* durable materials* and some good
craftsmanship* man& of these homes are still in use#
fter orld ar %% the ames /ouse* in
Pacific Palisades* alifornia (,+)* e6plored the idea that a home could be constructed
from off$the$shelf industrial parts and harness economies of scale for read&$made
components#
%n the ,7s the
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
8/119
.he most widel& cited benefit of prefab is econom& of scale* as components
or entire homes can be produced in large 4uantities# ?ut this is not a prere4uisite for
success# .hereAs !alue in faster project schedules* fewer weather dela&s* and moreefficient use of materials thanks to optimiBation and 4ualit& control# =ne of the primar&
benefits for the bu&er is predictabilit&8 Predefined design details and construction
processes gi!e the client a degree of suret& about the outcome that is often absent in
custom projects#
-ew of the following de!elopment trends ha!e been adopted in the recent
projects8
Majorit& of the latent defects such as poor joining and water leakage problems
found in
pre!ious projects ha!e been eliminated using in$situ fi6ed approach#
pplication has been di!ersified to other form of building construction#
apable of appl&ing to the construction of rather complicate shaped buildings#
More precast elements are in!ol!ed in the construction process#
=ther techni4ues like the using of mechanical formwork s&stem* lost$form or
tensioning techni4ues* are incorporated in the construction process (ef# 2)
2.2.2 P$)!a$%"a#%'n %n /)=)+'%n& "'n#$%)(> a "a() (#/* '! In/%a
Prefabrication in %ndia began with the emergence of the /industan /ousing
-actor .he compan& was de!eloped b& the first Prime Minister of %ndia* Pandit
Cawaharlal "ehru* as a solution to the housing crisis that resulted from the influ6 ofrefugees from est Pakistan in the ,5s# .he /industan /ousing -actor& pioneered the
production of pre$stressed concrete railwa& sleepers to replace dilapidated wooden
sleepers on %ndian ailwa&s# .he compan& changed its name shortl& thereafter to reflect
the di!ersit& of its operations# %t is now known as the /industan Prefab 1imited or /P1#
8
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
9/119
1ocated in Delhi* toda& the go!ernment$ run compan& prefabricates primaril& precast
concrete for architectural and ci!il projects throughout greater %ndia#
hen /P1 began it was intended to produce low$income housing solutions
for the deficit in %ndia# Precast wall panels and frame members such as beams and
columns pro!ided a much needed set of tools to erect 4uick structures for mass housing#
.he most difficult technolog& transfer obstacle for the /P1 has been the cost of
machiner& and materials for production# ince the go!ernment could not recoup the
return on in!estment for the factor& through housing production* prefabrication from
/P1 began to ser!ice other markets including higher dollar ci!il and larger public and
hotel buildings#
.he 4ualit& of construction is much higher when components are
manufactured in a stable en!ironment such as the factor .his is especiall& true in %ndia
where toda&* prefabrication has become s&non&mous with durable* modern* and western
construction methods# Materials are used more efficientl&* are safer from climatic
damage* and can be reused in the material stream# ?ecause of these benefits* a general
consensus in %ndia is to mo!e prefabricated building s&stems be&ond precast concrete
for large$scale construction to additional market sectors including a resurgent interest in
appl&ing prefabrication technolog& to housing#
.raditional construction techni4ues in!ol!e the use of timber molds or
shuttering for roof spans and other structural s&stems# .hese temporar& timber structures
ha!e a short lifespan and due to the !olume of construction in the peak seasons of spring
and summer for larger well$funded projects are often una!ailable# .his hinders
construction schedules and does not allow projects to be completed before cooler or
rain& seasons begin# /owe!er* construction does not stop in the summer despite the lack
of proper e4uipment and material# %nstead* using makeshift methods for construction on
site leads to inappropriate means and hence a substandard 4ualit& of construction in
9
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
10/119
finished buildings# .he prefabricated alternati!e to roof construction remo!es the issues
of timber molds and shuttering#
Material ad!ances in the prefabrication housing market ha!e also helped to
mitigate material failures# .he use of fl& ash in concrete increases its workabilit& and
impro!es thermal performance# %n addition* fl& ash concrete block is beginning to
replace traditional cla& bricks because it does not contain e6pansi!e soils that cause
walls and floors to crack with flu6es of temperature and humidit -l& ash is captured
from the coal burning process that generate electricit& and then reused to manufacture
more durable and stable building materials in a factor& en!ironment# .he material
manufacturing is more predictable and therefore ser!es to build more seismicall&
resistant structures#
Prefabrication technolog& has not transferred as easil& when compared with
other technologies because it is a production technolog& or knowledge based and not a
consumption technolog& or product based# .echnolog& transfer of prefabrication is not
as pertinent to architects as it is to manufacturers of building products* but we are
caretakers of culture in the > industr %n man& cases we are asked to help with man&
of the transfers that are occurring b& wa& of global practice or working for multi$
national firms that are producing prefabricated components and entire buildings for %ndia
and elsewhere# lthough transfers will continue to occur* especiall& in the area of
prefabrication in building* we should be well aware of how the decisions of
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
11/119
labor issues# ?& casting all the building elements at one go* which is monolithic in
nature results in elimination of stage construction practice* thus dri!es Prefab techni4ues
in bigger and faster wa& in mass housing* presentl& in %ndia this sector stri!e to deli!erthe houses for urban poor and middle class# .he project including construction of a
cluster of 35 houses was implemented b& aji! 0andhi /ousing for .he arnataka
/ousing ?oard 0o!ernment of arnataka# pecifications of the project include the
following8
> /ouse for
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
12/119
=n peed8
t site* 3 da& or + da& c&cle can be easil& achie!able and can complete the
entire house in a week time# .he -oundation* all ; oof components has to be
designed* based on the soil ; structural considerations# ll the details of >lectrical ;
Plumbing has to be precise and shall be placed in position before concreting# /owe!er*
the prefab technolog& is &et to mature enough in terms of cost* assembl& of elements at
site* issues associated with Coints ; its sealants etc#
=n Fualit&8
.he de$shuttering shall be done for wall ; roof after 2+ hours of concreting*
b& lea!ing ade4uate props to support roof concrete# /ence 4ualit& houses are built at one
go# .he maintenance of these houses o!er period will be !er& less or minimum# %n all
other methods* considerable change in design* manual errors* rectification* repetitions of
works etc# is seen during the project period and subse4uentl& demands high maintenance
cost#
=n 1abor8
.he re4uirement of labors is !er& minimum and hence* lesser 4ualit& issues
and speedier construction#
=n .echnolog&8
.he Prefab .echnolog& deli!ers the strong houses* which are more durable*
; sustainable against tornados* earth4uakes etc#* compare to an& other methods of
construction#
2.3 SMMARY O- LITERATRE REVIEW
12
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
13/119
=ne of the major ad!ancements in construction technolog& has been
prefabricated structure# -or a countr& like %ndia that is on the cusp of a massi!e
infrastructure upgrade* prefabricated structures (better known as prefabs) ha!e a hugepositi!e implication# Prefabs ha!e a sprawling market in %ndia in areas ranging from
large industrial and commercial construction to mass housing# s far as mass housing
goes* the ad!antages of prefab are se!eral# -irst* it eliminates the need for constant
shuttering and scaffolding# %n the prefab method* self$supporting precast concrete
structures are used that promise to e6pedite the construction time* apart from
standardiBing the 4ualit& of the structure# eduction in gestation period means faster
returns on in!estment and of course* faster occupanc& of the houses#
Population e6plosion has alwa&s been a bottleneck to the de!elopment for
the %ndian societ& pro!iding housing for economicall& weaker sections (>) and low
income groups is both gigantic and a comple6 problem# %ndia desperatel& needs a lot of
rapid dwelling units# Mass housing projects prefabrication techni4ue is one of the
solutions to the o!ergrowing problem* which is benefitted through the following
ad!antages8
elf$supporting read&$made components are used* so the need for formwork*
shuttering and scaffolding is greatl& reduced#
onstruction time is reduced and buildings are completed sooner* allowing an
earlier return of the capital in!ested#
=n$site construction and congestion is minimiBed#
Fualit& control can be easier in a factor& assembl& line setting than a
construction site setting#
Prefabrication can be located where skilled labour is more readil& a!ailable and
costs of labour* power* materials* space and o!erheads are lower#
.ime spent in bad weather or haBardous en!ironments at the construction site is
minimiBed#
13
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
14/119
1ess waste ma& occur#
d!anced materials such assandwich$structured compositecan be easil& used*
impro!ing thermal and sound insulation and air tightness#
14
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandwich-structured_compositehttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandwich-structured_compositehttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandwich-structured_composite -
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
15/119
CHAPTER 3
OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
3.1 OBJECTIVE
%n rehabilitation works for the gi!en power plant project* there is a need forfaster construction and as an approach to affordable homes for 5327 households* we
propose8
.he design of a modular house using prefabrication techni4ues#
3.2 SCOPE
.he rehabilitation site is Pithoragarh where an area of 9, hectares (2
acres) is allotted as shown in -igure 3#,#
15
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
16/119
-%&. 3.1 Ma '! P%#
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
17/119
%n order to reduce the time and cost of the project* it is proposed to adopt
prefabricated housing in this project#
.o minimise the number of components to be produced on a mass scale*
modular coordination will be adopted b& planning the different housing re4uirements#
3.3 MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
.he precast structure should be anal&Bed as a monolithic one and thejoints in them designed to take the forces of an e4ui!alent discrete s&stem#
esistance to horiBontal loading shall be pro!ided b& ha!ing appropriate moment
and shear resisting joints or placing shear walls in two directions at right angle or
otherwise# "o account is to be taken of rotational stiffness* if an& of the floor$wall
joint in case of precast bearing wall building# .he indi!idual components shall be
designed* taking into consideration the appropriate end conditions and loads at
!arious stages of construction# .he components of the structure shall be designed for
loads in accordance with code# %n addition members shall be designed for handling*
e6ertion and impact loads that might be e6pected during handling and erection#
3.3.1 T)$;%n'+'&* an/ ()"%!%"a#%'n(
Harious terms included in Modular oordination are8
,# Module$ a unit of siBe used in dimensional coordination#
17
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
18/119
2# Modular grid$ a rectangular coordinate reference s&stem in which the distance
between consecuti!e lines is the basic module or a multi module# .his multi
module ma& differ for each of the two dimensions of the grid#3# Modular oordination$ a dimensional coordination emplo&ing the basic module
or a multi module# .he purposes of Modular oordination are to reduce the
!ariet& of component siBes produced and to allow the building designer greater
fle6ibilit& in the arrangement of components#
+# Multi module$ a module whose siBe is a selected multiple of the basic module#
-or selecting the materials for prefabrication the following factors should be
considered8
(a) >as& a!ailabilit& (b) 1ight weight for eas& handling and transport (c)
.hermal insulation propert& (d) >as& workabilit& (e) Durabilit& (f) "on combustibilit&
(g) ound insulation (h) >conom& (i) an& other special re4uirement in a particular
application#
3.3.2 R+)( $)+a#)/ #' a(%" )+);)n#(
set of rules as detailed below would be ade4uate for meeting the
re4uirements of con!entional and prefabricated construction# ules relate to the
following basic element8
(a) .he planning grid in both directions of the horiBontal plan shall be 3 M for residential
buildings# .he center lines of load bearing walls should preferabl& coincide with the
gridlines#
(b) .he planning module in the !ertical direction shall be ,M for residential buildings#
18
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
19/119
(c) Preferred increments for sill heights* doors* and windows and other fenestration shall
be ,M#
(d) %n the case of internal columns* the grid lines shall coincide with the center lines of
columns# %n case of e6ternal columns and columns near the lift and stairwells* the grid
lines shall coincide with center lines of the column in the topmost store
3.3.3 R+)( $)+a#)/ #' "';'n)n#(
.he preferred dimensions of precast elements shall be as follows where M
represents a Module8
(a) -looring and oofing cheme8 Precast slabs or other precast structural flooring units8
,# 1ength $ "ominal length shall be in multiples of ,M#
2# idth $ "ominal width shall be in multiples of #5 M#
3# =!erall .hickness8 =!erall thickness shall be in multiples of #, M#
(b) ?eams8
,# 1ength $ "ominal length shall be in multiples of , M#
2# idth $ "ominal width shall be in multiples of #, M#
3# =!erall Depth $ =!erall depth of the floor Bone shall be in multiples of #, M#
(c) olumns8
19
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
20/119
,# /eight $ /eight of columns for industrial and other building , M#
2# 1ateral Dimensions $ =!erall lateral dimension or diameter of columns shall
be in multiples of #, M#
(d) alls8
.hickness $ .he nominal thickness of walls shall be in multiples of #, M#
(e) 1intels8
,# 1ength $ "ominal length shall be in multiples of , M#
2# idth $ "ominal width shall be in multiples of #, M#
3# Depth $ "ominal depth shall be in multiples of #, M#
3.3.4 R)@%$);)n#( !'$ /)(%&n "'n(%/)$a#%'n(
(i) %n some con!entional forms of construction* e6perience has shown that the
structures are capable of safel& sustaining abnormal conditions of loading and
remaining stable after the remo!al of primar& structural member# %t has been shown
that some forms of building structure and particularl& some industrialiBed large panel
s&stem ha!e little reser!e strength to resist forces not specificall& catered for in the
design#
(ii) de4uate buttressing of e6ternal wall panels is important since these elements
are not full& restrained on both sides b& floor panels# .he designer ma& take
ade4uate design precautions# >6perience shows that the e6ternal wall panel
connections are the weakest points of a precast panel building#
20
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
21/119
(iii) %t is e4uall& important to pro!ide restraint to all load bearing elements at the
corners of the building# .hese elements and the e6ternal ends of cross$wall units
should be stiffened either b& introducing columns as connecting units or b& jointingthem to non$structural wall units which in emergenc& ma& support the load# Cointing
of these units should be done bearing in mind the need for load support in an
emergenc
(i!) %n prefabricated construction* the possibilit& of gas or other e6plosions which
can remo!e primar& structural elements leading to progressi!e collapse of the
structure shall be taken into account# %t is* therefore* necessar& to consider the
possibilit& of progressi!e collapse in which the failure or displacement of one
element of a structure causes the failure or displacement of another element and
results in the partial or total collapse of the building#
(!) Pro!ision in the design to reduce the probabilit& of progressi!e collapse is
essential in buildings of o!er si6 store&s and is of relati!el& higher priorit& than for
buildings of lower height#
(!i) %t is necessar& to ensure that an& local damage to a structure does not spread to
other parts of the structure remote from the point of mishap and that the o!erall
stabilit& is not impaired* but it ma& not be necessar& to stiffen all parts of the
structure against local damage or collapse in the immediate !icinit& of a mishap*
unless the design briefs specificall& re4uires this to be done#
(!ii) dditional protection ma& be re4uired in respect of damage from !ehicles*
further it is necessar& to consider the effect of damage to or displacement of a load$
bearing member b& an uncontrolled !ehicle# %t is strongl& recommended that
concrete kerbs or similar method ade4uatel& protect important structural members#
21
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
22/119
(!iii) %n all aspects of erection that affect structural design* it is essential that the
designer should maintain a close liaison with the builder or contractor regarding the
erection procedures to be followed#
(i6) -ailures that ha!e occurred during construction appear to be of two t&pes# .he
first of these is the pack$of$cards t&pe of collapse in* which the absence of
restraining elements* such as partitions* cladding or shear walls* and means that the
structure is not stable during the construction period# .he second is the situation in
which one element falls during erection and lands on an element below# .he
connections of the lower element then gi!e wa& under the loading* both static and
d&namic* and a chain reaction of further collapse is set up#
precaution against the first form of failure is that the o!erall stabilit& of
a building shall be considered in all its erection stages as well as in its completed
state# ll joints that ma& be re4uired to resist moments and shears during the erection
stage onl& shall be designed with these in mind# .emporar& works re4uired to
pro!ide stabilit& during construction shall be designed carefull
.o guard against the second form of failure* that is* the dropping of a unit
during erection* particular attention shall be gi!en to the details of all pre$formed
units and their seatings to ensure that the& are sufficientl& robust to withstand the
ma6imum stresses that can arise from site conditions# Precast concrete construction
generall& shall be capable of withstanding the impact forces that can arise from bad
workmanship on site#
22
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
23/119
3.3.5 R)@%$);)n#( '! ?'%n#( an/ "'nn)"#%'n(
.he design of joints shall be made in the light of their assessment with
respect to the following considerations8
(i) -easibilit& $ .he feasibilit& of a joint shall be determined b& its load$carr&ing
capacit& in the particular situation in which the joint is to function#
(ii) Practicabilit& $ Practicabilit& of joint shall be determined b& the amount and t&pe
of material re4uired in construction* cost of material* fabrication and erection and the
time for fabrication and erection#
(iii) er!iceabilit& $ er!iceabilit& shall be determined b& the joints and e6pected
beha!ior for repeated or possible o!erloading and e6posure to climatic or chemical
conditions#
(i!) -ire ating $ .he fire rating for joints of precast components shall be higher or at
least e4ual to connecting members#
(!) ppearance $ .he appearance of precast components joint shall merge with
architectural aesthetic appearance and shall not be ph&sicall& prominent compared to
other parts of structural components#
.he following are the re4uirements of a structural joint8
(a) %t shall be capable of being designed to transfer the imposed load and momentswith a known margin of safet
(b) %t shall occur at logical locations in the structure and at points which ma& be most
readil& anal&Bed and easil& reinforced#
23
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
24/119
(c) %t shall accept the loads without marked displacement or rotation and a!oid high
local stresses#
(d) %t shall accommodate tolerances in elements#
(e) %t shall re4uire little temporar& support* permit adjustment and demand onl& a
few distinct operation to make#
(f) %t shall permit effecti!e inspection and rectification#
(g) %t shall be reliable in ser!ice with other parts of the building#
(h) %t shall enable the structure to absorb sufficient energ& during earth4uakes so as
to a!oid sudden failure of the structure#
Coining techni4ues:materials normall& emplo&ed are8
(a) elding of cleats or projecting steel#
(b) =!erlapping reinforcement* loops and linking steel grouted b& concrete#
(c) einforced concrete ties all round a slab#
(d) Prestressing#
(e) >po6& grouting#
(f) ?olts and nuts connection#
(g) combination of the abo!e* and
(h) n& other method pro!en b& test#
24
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
25/119
3.3.6 S#a"%n& /$%n& #$an('$# an/ (#'$a&)
>!er& precaution shall be taken against o!erstress or damage* b& the
pro!ision of suitable packings at agreed points of support# Particular attention is
directed to the inherent dangers of breakage and damage caused b& supporting other
than at two positions* and also b& the careless placing of packings for e6ample* not
!erticall& one abo!e the other)# ibs* corners and intricate projections from solid
section should be ade4uatel& protected# .acking pieces shall be ade4uatel& protected#
.acking pieces shall not discolor* disfigure or otherwise permanentl& cause mark onunite or members# tacking shall be arranged or the precast units should be
protected* so as to pre!ent the accumulation of trapped water or rubbish* and if
necessar& to reduce the risk of efflorescence#
.he following points shall be kept in !iew during stacking8
(a) are should be taken to ensure that the flat elements are stacked with right side
up# -or identification* top surfaces should be clearl& marked#
(b) tacking should be done on a hard and suitable ground to a!oid an& sinking of
support when elements are stacked#
(c) %n case of horiBontal stacking* packing materials shall be at specified locations
and shall be e6actl& one o!er the other to a!oid cantile!er stress in panels#
(d) omponents should be packed in a uniform wa& to a!oid an& undue projection of
elements in the stack* which normall& is a source of accident#
25
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
26/119
3.3., Han/+%n& a$$an&);)n#(
1ifting and handling positions shall be dearl& defined particularl& where
these sections are critical# here necessar& special facilities* such as bolt holes or
projecting loops* shall be pro!ided in the units and full instructions supplied for
handling#
-or precast prestressed concrete members* the residual stress at the age
of particular operation of handling and erection shall be considered in conjunction
with an& stresses caused b& the handling or erection of member# .he compressi!e
stress thus computed shall not e6ceed 5 percent of the cube strength of the concrete
at the time of handling and erection#
3.3. E@%;)n# $)@%$)/
.he e4uipment used to the precast concrete industr&:construction ma& be
classified into the following categories8
(a) Machiner& re4uired for 4uarr&ing of coarse and fine aggregates#
(b) on!e&ing e4uipment such as bolt con!e&ors* chain con!e&ors* screw con!e&ors*
bucket ele!ators* hoists* etc#
(c) oncrete mi6ing machines
(d) oncrete !ibrating machines
26
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
27/119
(e) >rection e4uipment such as cranes* derricks* hoists* chain pulle& blocks* etc#
f) .ransport machiner& such as tractor$cum$trailers* dumpers* lorries* locomoti!es*
motor boats and rarel& e!en helicopters#
(g) orkshop machiner& for making and repairing teel and timber moulds#
(h) ?ar straightening* bending and welding machines to make reinforcement cages#
(i) Minor tools and tackles such as wheelbarrows* concrete buckets* etc#
(j) team generation plant for accelerated curing#
%n addition to the abo!e* pumps and soil compacting machiner&are
re4uired at the building site for the e6ecution of ci!il engineeringprojects in!ol!ing
prefabricated components#
3.4 CONCLDING REMARS
%n order to cope with the demand for housing to fulfill the deficit in housing*
prefabrication will definitel& sta& once it is adopted# .his ma& definitel& impro!e 4ualit&
of construction* durabilit& of components* time of construction and aesthetics of
surroundings# .he ne6t chapter gi!es the details of planning and design of prefab
components as per Modular oordination and architectural inputs#
27
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
28/119
CHAPTER 4
RESLTS AND DISCSSIONS
4.1 PLANNING
4.1.1 In#$'/"#%'n
hile designing a building* the prere4uisite is a proper plan# .he procedure
for selection of a plan encompasses plot dimensions and architectural inputs#
Plot dimensions are gi!en or assumed 4uantities to which the plan must
compl %t should ha!e the basic re4uirements of the building like a house needs
a bedroom* li!ing area* kitchen* bathroom* toilet* dining area etc#
rchitectural inputs such as the sun diagram are re4uired for a proper
orientation of the building# nthropometrics* space standards* functional
planning and circulation are other architectural inputs to be taken care of while
designing a plan#
.he introduction of Modular oordination in the industr& not onl&
pro!ides dimensional basis for the coordination of dimensions and of those
buildings incorporating them* but also it acts as a tool towards rationaliBation and
industrialiBation of the building industr Modular oordination is essentiall&
based on the use of modules (basic module and multi$modules) and a reference
28
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
29/119
s&stem to define coordinating spaces and Bones for building elements and for the
components which form them# %t is a concept of coordination of dimension and
space* in which buildings and components are dimensioned and positioned interms of a basic unit or module* known as , M# .here are standard rules to abide
b& $ ules for locating building elements within the reference s&stemI ules for
siBing building components in order to determine their work siBesI ules for
defining preferred siBes for building components and coordinating dimensions
for buildings# %t permits a fle6ible t&pe of standardiBation* which encourages the
use of a limited number of standardiBed building components for the construction
of different t&pes of buildings# %t ensures dimensional coordination between
installation (e4uipment* storage units* other fitted furniture etc#) as well as with
the rest of the building#
.he application of Modular oordination ma& be applied to the design*
manufacture and assembl& of buildings* their components and installations* and
it affects the twin factors of position and dimension# Modular oordination ma&
be applied to a wide range of building technologies* ranging from component
building through partial prefabrication to rationaliBed traditional building
methods# dditionall&* components* which are coordinated on a modular basis*
ma& be used in reno!ation programs#
4.1.2 ARCHITECTRAL INPTS
4.1.2.1 ORIENTATION
.he ideal house orientation is that the main long a6is of the building runs
>ast$est* i#e# ridge line# %t is !er& important that the house should be oriented
29
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
30/119
with respect to the sun and not to magnetic north# .he most used rooms must be
on the side of the house oriented towards the sun# lso the least used rooms on
the side of the house in shade# .he orientation of a house is done according to thesun$diagram as shown in -igure +#,# (ef# ,)
-%&. 4.1 Tast
as the cooking direction#
30
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
31/119
ombined ?athroom and ater loset (2+J,2)8 %n the "orthwest or est
and ne!er be placed ne6t to the kitchen#
?edroom (3J+)8 /ead direction towards outh and bedroom location is
outhwest
1i!ing (3J+)8 %deal in the "orthwest direction
Herandah8 ?est suited in the "orth# (ef# ,)
-%&. 4.2 An#
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
32/119
architectural space is man$made# .he space must be technicall& efficient and
aestheticall& satisf&ing#
>!er& space accommodates an acti!it& or a function* which decides the
area and !olume re4uired# .he acti!ities determine the furniture re4uirements for
the space#
4.1.2.4 -NCTIONAL PLANNING AND CIRCLATION
%dentif&ing the spatial re4uirements and ps&chological needs de!eloped
in the functional program is a primar& element of the planning process that
translates to an ownerKs spatial and ser!ice re4uirements for a building or facilit
e& tasks in this process are8 problem definition or statement* establishing goals*
collecting and anal&Bing facts* establishing functional relationships* and
unco!ering and testing concepts# .here is also a need to design for fle6ibilit& of
programmed space# successfull& designed building that functions properl& in
all respects is composed of building s&stems* materials* and technologies that are
selected and integrated to be mutuall& supporti!e as a cohesi!e whole s&stem#
.he accessibilit& of circulation s&stems determines the o!er$all e6tent of
access that can be attained in a buildingI therefore* these parts of buildings are
gi!en high priorit& in code re!iews for barrier$free design#
4.1.3 -INALISATION O- PLANS -OR DI--ERENT OCCPANCIES
32
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
33/119
4.1.3.1 PROPOSED PLAN -OR LIG WITH GRID LINES
.he plan for 1%0 is shown in -igure +#3 with a carpet area of ' m 2#
-%&. 4.3 P+an !'$ LIG D%;)n(%'n( a$) %nn)$ /%;)n(%'n( an/ a$) %n ;.
4.1.3.2 PROPOSED PLAN -OR MIG WITH GRID LINES
.he plan for M%0 is shown in -igure +#+ with a carpet area of m 2#
33
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
34/119
-%&. 4.4 P+an !'$ MIG D%;)n(%'n( a$) %nn)$ /%;)n(%'n( an/ a$) %n ;.
4.1.3.3. PROPOSED PLAN -OR HIG WITH GRID LINES
.he plan for /%0 is shown in -igure +#5 with a carpet area of ,5 m 2#
34
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
35/119
-%&. 4.5 P+an !'$ HIG D%;)n(%'n( a$) %nn)$ /%;)n(%'n( an/ a$) %n ;.
4.2 ANALYSIS
4.2.1 E(#%;a#%'n '! +'a/( !'$ #
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
36/119
4.2.1.1 Loads for slabs
elf weight of lab L concreteJbJD L wself
1i!e 1oad (% 975 Part$2I Pg8 ) L 2
kN
m2
-loor -inish L ,kN
m2
Design
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
37/119
eight of slabL concJ ? J D J .
eight of beamsL concJ ? J D J .
eight of wallL masonr&J 1 J / J .
elf weight L concJ 1 J ? J D
4.2.1.4 Loads for footing
1oad on the column L a6ial
elf weight of footing L ,E (a6ial)
.otal loadL a6ial N ,E (a6ial)
4.2.2 G$%/%() /%(#$%#%'n '! (#$"#$a+ )+);)n#(
37
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
38/119
-%&. 4.6 ATOCAD +an (
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
39/119
"umber of slab elements of dimensions 3 m J 5 m L + N 2
"umber of beams of span 3 m L ' N 2
"umber of beams of span 5 m L ' N 3
"umber of columns L N 3
4.2.2.3 Modular coordination applied to HIG housing
"umber of slab elements of dimensions 3 m J 5 m L + N 2 N +
"umber of beams of span 3 m L ' N 2 N +
"umber of beams of span 5 m L ' N 3 N 3
"umber of columns L N 3 N +
4.3 DESIGNS
4.3.1 In#$'/"#%'n
.he t&pical structural elements are identified considering the -igure .he
indentified elements are
,# -ooting
2# olumn
3# lab
+# ?eams
39
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
40/119
.he loads on these elements are calculated considering the plan# .he
re4uired data and other re4uirements for the design of structural elements are
pro!ided then and there# ll the elements are checked for ade4uac& with respectto handling stresses which is uni4ue for prefab construction# %n the absence of
codal pro!isions for joints* the recommended detailing of joints are followed#
4.3.2 -'n/a#%'n
-oundation is a sub$structure of a building which is alwa&s in contactwith soil* to transmit the super$structure load safel& to the subsoil* in such a wa&
that the actual pressure on the soil below foundation should be less than the safe
bearing capacit& of the soil#
ccording to .erBaghi* if the depth of foundation is less than or e4ual to
width of foundation* then such foundation is called shallow foundation# ?ut if the
depth of foundation is greater than its width then the foundation is known as
deep foundation#
.&pes of hallow foundation8
i# %solated foundation8 s4uare* rectangle* circle#
ii# ombined foundation8 rectangle and trapeBoidal
iii# trap footingi!# Mat or aft foundation
.&pes of Deep foundation8
40
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
41/119
i# Pile foundation
ii# Pier foundation
iii# ell foundation
i!# aisson
4.3.2.1 Design procedure for isolated square footing
S#)1>
-ind out the depth of the foundation Dffrom the following formula8
qs
s[1sin1+sin
]2
(+#,)
here*
DfL depth of foundation in meter
4sL safe bearing capacit& of soil in kPa
s L unit weight of soil inkN
m3
L internal angle of cohesion L 3o
S#)2>
-ind out the plan area
41
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
42/119
rea L L load
qs
(+#2)
1oad L N f
here*
L load from column in k"
fL self weight of foundation in k" L ,E of
4sL safe bearing capacit& of soil inkN
m3
S#)3>
-ind out the length and breadth of foundation#
1 ? L rea Ofor rectangular foundation
? ? L rea Ofor s4uare foundation
4d
2 L rea Ofor circular foundation
S#)4>
-ind out ma6imum bending moment at the face of column
S#)5>
-ind out the thickness of footing from the following formula#
42
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
43/119
Mu* limitL #,39fckbd2 (+#3)
here*
Mu*limitL ma6imum bending moment in k"$m
fckL characteristic strength of concrete in
N
mm2
b L width of the section
d L effecti!e depth
S#)6>
-ind out area of tension steel from following formula8
u,limit= .87 fyA std [1 fyA stfckbd]M
(+#+)
here*
Mu*limitL ma6imum bending moment in k"$m
f&L &ield strength of steel in MPa
d L effecti!e depth
stL area of tension steel
S#),>
.he footing must be checked for one wa& shear# ccording to %$+5'82* the critical
section for one wa& shear will take place at a distance QdA from one face of column#
here*
43
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
44/119
d L effecti!e depth of foundation
S#)>
.he section must be checked for two wa& shear# ccording to %$+5'82* the critical
section for two wa& shear will occur at a distance d
2
from all faces of column#
S#)7>
.he footing must be checked for load at the base of column
c*br L
wcol
A g 0.45 fck
A1
A2
here*
c*br L bearing stress
wcolL load on column
gL gross area of column
fckL characteristic compressi!e strength of concrete in MPa
A
1
A2
L 2 (?& %8 +5'82)
S#) 18>
44
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
45/119
pacing of main reinforcementsL 0.785main2
A st b
pacing of trans!erse reinforcementL 0.785transvrs2
A st, main b
4.3.2.2 Design calculations
Da#a>
, ? of soil L 2 kPa
2 D)#)$;%na#%'n '! +an a$)a
45
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
46/119
rea L L
load
qs
L
!+!fqs
L258+0.1258
200
L ,#+, m2
S#) 3> D)#)$;%na#%'n '! %/#< '! !'n/a#%'n
ssuming a s4uare footing8
idth of the s4uare footing L ? L A L 1.419 L ,#, m
1ets us assume the width of the footing L ,#2 m
/ence* we ha!e to pro!ide a s4uare footing of siBe ,#2 m 1.2
m
S#) 4> D)#)$;%na#%'n '! ;a0%;; )n/%n& ;';)n#
Ma6imum bending moment Lw a
2
2
here*
wL upward soil pressure inkNm
a=
"
2
b
2
46
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
47/119
?L width of foundation L ,#2 m
? L width of column L 3 mm L #3 m
w L
load
column[ #lanara ]
J ?
L[258
1.22]
J ,#2
L 2,5
kN
m
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
48/119
u=.87 fyA std [1fyA stfckbd]M
32#'5 106
L .87415 A st175 [1 415A st201200175 ]
-rom the abo!e e4uation8Ast L 5+'#22 mm2
A st,min=.0012(b $)
.0012(1200230) L 33,#2 mm2
/ence*A st>A st,min
S#) ,> C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
49/119
-%&. 4.6 C$%#%"a+ ()"#%'n !'$ 'n) a* (
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
50/119
!
k c
-rom % +5'8 2* table number ,8
#rcntagof tnsionstl=#=100Ast
bd L #2'
-or*
p L #2' andfck L 2 MPa
c=.36 MPa
k=1
/ence*
!(k c )
.he depth chosen is not ade4uate as per one wa& shear criteria and the depth has to be
redesigned#
[ 1.52581.22 ] [ .275d ] 1.2=.361.2 d
-rom the abo!e e4uationI d L 27+ mm
dopting the depth to be 3 mm
S#) > C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
51/119
-%&. 4. C$%#%"a+ ()"#%'n !'$ n"
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
52/119
!Vksc
/ence* the design is safe#
S#) 7> C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
53/119
ssuming 9 mm diameter bars* spacing L s L.785641200
.00123561200 L ,,7#' mm ,
mm
/ence* 9 mm dia -e+,5 bars will be pro!ided X , mm c:c distance as trans!erse
reinforcement#
-%&.4.7 R)%n!'$");)n# /)#a%+( '! (@a$) !''#%n&
53
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
54/119
4.3.3 COLMN
4.3.3.1 Introduction
olumn is a !ertical compression member* whose main function is to transfer
load from slabs and beams to the foundation#
column is subjected to following stresses8
%# Direct compression#
%%# ompression as well as bending stress due to eccentric loading#
T*)( '! "'+;n(>
%# Pedestal8 column is said to be pedestal if its effecti!e length to breadth ratio is less than
3#lff
b
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
55/119
%%# hort column8
column is said to be short column when if its effecti!e length to breadth ratio is
between 3 to ,2#
%%%# 1ong column8
column is said to be long column if its effecti!e length to breadth ratio is
greater than ,2#
4.3.3.2 Design procedure
/ere* in this project we will adopt limit state method for design of columns as per %
+5'82#
.>P ,8 1oad calculations
1oad on columnL P k"
Design constant a) 0rade of concrete LM 2 b) 0rade of steel L -e +,5#
1 L
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
56/119
,# %f both the ends are fi6ed then* 1effL #'5 J length of column#
2# %f one end is fi6ed and another is pinned then 1effL #9 J length of column#
3# %f one end is fi6ed and other end is free then 1effL 2 J length of column#
+# %f both the ends are pinned then* 1effL ,# J length of column#
%f lff
b
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
57/119
.>P 58 1ongitudinal reinforcements
-rom scand g!alues* calculate number of bars#
-or Z* number of barsL "
.>P +8 hear reinforcements
a) elect diameter of lateral ties least of ' mm or ,:+ diameter of the largest longitudinal
bar not less than ,' mm diameter#
b) pacing of lateral ties least of
i) 1east lateral dimension of column
ii) i6teen times the smallest diameter of bar
iii) 3 mm
.>P '8 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at (
3
offset from both edges#
1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of columnL w
heck for dimensions8
"egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!erLwl
2
2
Positi!e moment at mid spanL wl2
8
"et e6cess momentL Positi!e moment [ "egati!e moment
Me6cessL #,39fckbd2
d should be less than adopted depth* for safe condition#
57
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
58/119
heck for shear8
HuL wu l
2
!L %
bd
-or !alues of ! and pt* refer table ,* %+5'$2I Pg8 73 to find the !alue of \c#
\c should be less than !* for safe in shear#
4.3.3.3 Interior column design
.>P ,8 1oad calculations
1oad on columnL ,2 k"#
Design constant a) 0rade of concrete LM2 b) 0rade of steel L -e +,5#
1 L P 38 .&pe of column
58
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
59/119
lff
bL,9#' W ,2* hence long column#
.>P +8 dditional moment due to buckling in long column
Ma6 L Ma& L 'u $
2000 ((ff$)
2
'u $
2000 ((ff$)
2
L 9#+ k"$m
PuBL #+5fckcN #75f&sc L 75,#+ k"
'u
'u) L #2* YnL ,
Mu6 L Mu& L ,5#29 k"$m*
Mu*, limMu*
N
Muy, limMuy
L #59 V,# as per P,' Design ids
.>P 58 1ongitudinal reinforcements
scL ,# E gL '25 mm2
-or Z L ,2 mm* number of bar L " L5#52' '
.>P '8 hear reinforcements
a) elect diameter of lateral ties least of
' mm or ,:+ diameter of the largest longitudinal bar not less than ,' mm diameter#
59
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
60/119
Diameter of the lateral ties : link L9 mm
b) pacing of lateral ties : link least of
i) 1east lateral dimension of column L25 mmii) i6teen times the smallest diameter of bar L ,'J,2L,2 mm and
iii) 3 mm
Pro!ide 9 mmZ X,5 mm c:c
.>P 78 ummar& of design
,# olumn siBe8 25 J 25 mm2
2# 1ongitudinal teel8 '],2
3# 1ateral teel8 21]9 X,5 mm c:c
.>P 98 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at (
3
m i#e# ,#55 m offset from both edges as shown in -igure
+#,#
-%&. 4.18 H'' $'=%(%'n %n "'+;n(
1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of columnL ,#5'25kN
m
heck for dimensions8
60
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
61/119
"egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2
2
L
1.56251.552
2 L ,#97 k"$m
Positi!e moment at mid span L wl2
8
L 1.56252.3252
8
L,#5 k"$
m
"et e6cess moment L #9,+ k"$m
Me6cessL #,39fckbd2
d L 3+#35 mm V ,7 mm* /ence chosen depth is safe
heck for shear8
HuL wu l
2
L 1.56251.15
2
Hu L #99 k"
!L%u
b dL 898
250250L #,+
N
mm2
ptL ,#
(efer table ,* %+5'$2I Pg8 73)
\c L #'2
N
mm2 W ! (#,+
N
mm2 )
61
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
62/119
/ence hear afe
.hus column is safe for erection stresses too#
-%&. 4.11 In#)$%'$ "'+;n /)#a%+(
4.3.3.4 !terior column design
.>P ,8 1oad calculations
1oad on columnL ,72 k"#
Design constant a) 0rade of concrete LM 2 b) 0rade of steel L -e +,5#
62
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
63/119
1 L
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
64/119
Mu6 L Mu& L ,#2 k"$m*
Mu*, lim
Mu*
N
Muy, lim
Muy
L #7 V ,# as per P,' Design ids
.>P 58 1ongitudinal reinforcements
scL ,# E gL mm2
-or Z L ,2 mm* number of bars L " L 9
Pro!ide 9],2 as longitudinal steel#
.>P '8 hear reinforcements
a) elect diameter of lateral ties least of
' mm or ,:+ diameter of the largest longitudinal bar not less than ,' mm diameter#
Diameter of the lateral ties : link L9 mm
b) pacing of lateral ties : link 1east of
i) 1east lateral dimension of column L 3 mm
ii) i6teen times the smallest diameter of bar L ,'J,2 L ,2 mm and
iii) 3 mm
Pro!ide 21]9 X,5 mm c:c
.>P 78 ummar& of design
,# olumn siBe8 3J3 mm2
2# 1ongitudinal teel8 9],2
3# 1ateral teel8 21]9 X,5 mm c:c
.>P 98 heck for erection stresses
64
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
65/119
/ooks are pro!ided at (
3
m i#e# ,#55m offset from both edges#
1oad on beam due to erection L self weight of column L 2#25kN
m
heck for dimensions8
"egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2
2
L 2.251.552
2
L 2#7 k"$m
Positi!e moment at mid spanL wl2
8
L 2.252.3252
8
L ,#529 k"$m
"et e6cess moment L ,#,9 k"$m
Me6cessL #,39fckbd2
d L 37#75 mm V 2, mm* /ence chosen depth is safe
heck for shear8
HuL wu l
2
L 2.251.15
2
Hu L ,#2 k"
!L%u
b dL #,+
N
mm2
ptL ,#
65
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
66/119
(efer table ,* %+5'$2I Pg8 73)
\c L #'2
N
mm2
W ! (#,+
N
mm2
)
/ence hear afe
.hus column is safe for erection stresses too#
-%&. 4.12 E0#)$%'$ "'+;n /)#a%+(
4.3.4 BEAM
66
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
67/119
4.3.4.1 Introduction
beam is a structural element that is capable of withstanding load primaril& b&
resisting bending# .he bending force is induced into the material of the beam as a result
of the e6ternal loads* own weight* span and e6ternal reactions to these loads#
?eams are generall& described b& how the& are supported# upports restrict
lateral and:or rotational mo!ements so as to satisf& stabilit& conditions as well as to limit
the deformations to a certain allowance# simple beam is supported b& a pin support at
one end and a roller support at the other end# beam with a laterall& and rotationall&fi6ed support at one end with no support at the other end is called a cantile!er beam#
beam simpl& supported at two points and ha!ing one end or both ends e6tended be&ond
the supports is called an o!erhanging beam#
4.3.4.2 D)(%&n $'")/$) !'$ /)(%&n '! a )a;
.>P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth
dL(
"asic valu for vrtical dflction limit as #r +456: 2000- 'ag37
DLdN effecti!e co!er
b L $2
.>P 28 1oad calculations
elf weight wself L concJ b J D
67
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
68/119
eight of brick masonr& wall if supported o!er it wwall L masonr&J l J t
1i!e load as per % 975(Part 2)8,97 L wli!e
.otal 1oad L wselfNwwallNwli!e
-actored 1oadL uL J,#5
.>P 38 Moment calculations
Mu L !u lff2
8
Mu*limL #,39fckbd2
I! MM+%;a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).
.>P +8 einforcement details
MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$A
st f
y
b d f ck)
stis calculated from abo!e formula
st* minimumL .85
fy
Jb J D
-or st* calWst* min or st* calVst* min
dopt ^ diameter bars#
68
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
69/119
"umber of bars L
ara of on A st , calA st , min w . ic . vr gratr
-or higher depth beams side face reinforcement are pro!ided for st*face L #,E of bwJdw
.>P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force Hu L wu l
2
"ominal shear stress L %u
b d
Permissible hear trength of concrete is referred from .able , % +5' using M 2 and
st!alue#
%f "ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stressL Permissible hear trength#
%f "ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stress#
HusL 0.87 fy A sv d
v
s!is found from abo!e formula#
-or the selected stirrup* its area should alwa&s be greater than s!#
.>P '8 heck for deflection
69
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
70/119
?asic (
d
L 2
-or pt find ktreferring %+5'$2* Pg8 39
Ma6 W ctual
%f ?asic J ktWctual then the beam is safe in deflection#
.>P 78 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at #3m offset from both edges#
1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beam
C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
71/119
dL (
15
L 3000
15
L 2mm
DLdNeffecti!e co!erL 2N3L 23mm
b L,5mm
.>P 28 1oad calculations
elf weightL concJ b J D L 25J#,5J#23 L #9'25kN
m
eight of brick masonr& wall abo!e plinth L masonr&J l J t L,J2#'J#,5 L 7#+,kN
m
.otal 1oadL 9#27kN
m
-actored 1oadL ,#5J9#27L,2#+[LkN
m
.>P 38 Moment calculations
MuL !u lff2
30
L 1332
30
L 3# k"$m (based on elastic foundation)
Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L ,'#5' k"$m
MM+%;H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).
.>P +8 einforcement details
71
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
72/119
MuL #97Jf&JstJd (,$ A st fy
b d f ck
)
stL5' mm2
st* minimumL &85
fy
Jb J D L .85
415
J,5J23 L 7#'' mm2
st* calVst* min
dopt 9mm diameter bars#
"umber of bars L 2
H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force HuL wu l
2
L 133
2
L ,#5 k"
"ominal shear stress L %u
b d
L 19500
150200
L #'5 N
mm2
Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M2 and st L ,5#72
mm2* \c L#3
N
mm2
"ominal shear stress W Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stress#
72
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
73/119
HusL 0.87 fy A sv d
v
,5 L 0.87415 A sv 200
300
s!L 9,#, mm2
-or a two legged 9 mm diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+L,#+9 mm 2 W s!
H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF388 ;; "9" !'$ (P 78 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at #3m offset from both edges#
1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beam L #9'25kN
m
73
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
74/119
C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
75/119
.>P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth
dL (
20
L 5000
20
L 25 mm
DLdNeffecti!e co!erL 25N3L 29 mm
b L,5mm
.>P 28 1oad calculations
elf weightL concJ b J DL 25J#,5 J #29 L ,#5
kN
m
eight of brick masonr& wall abo!e plinth L masonr&J l J tL , J 2#' J #,5L 7#+,kN
m
.otal 1oadL 9#+'kN
m
-actored 1oadL ,#5J9#+'L,3kNm
.>P 38 Moment calculations
MuL !u lff2
30
L !u lff2
30
L ,#933 k"$m (based on elastic
foundation)
Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L 25#975 k"$m
MM+%; H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).
75
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
76/119
.>P +8 einforcement details
MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy
b d f ck
)
stL ,2#22 mm2
st* minimumL .85
fy
Jb J D L .85
415
J,5J29 L 9'#2 mm2
st* cal
Wst* min
dopt , mm diameter bars#
"umber of barsL 3
H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y18 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force HuL wu l2
L 1352
L 32#5 k"
"ominal shear stressL %u
b d
L 32500
150250
L #97 N
mm2
Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M 2 and stL 235#5
mm2*\cL#5N
mm2
"ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stress#
76
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
77/119
HusL
0.87 fy A sv d
v
325 L 0.87415 A sv 250
300
s!L ,9#, mm2
-or a two legged , mm diameter stirrup* 2J79#5L,57 mm 2 Ws!
H)n") $'=%/) 2LY18F388 ;; "9" !'$ (
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
78/119
-%& 4.14 H'' $'=%(%'n %n )a;(
C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
79/119
-%&. 4.15 D)#a%+( '! P+%n#< )a; P 28 1oad calculations
elf weightL concJ b J DL 25J#,5J#3 L,#,25kN
m
79
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
80/119
Dead weight of slabL concJ b J D L 25J,J#,+ L 3#5kN
m
1i!e 1oad L 2kN
m
-loor -inish L ,kN
m
.otal 1oad L 7#'25kN
m
-actored 1oadL ,#5J7#'25L ,,#5kN
m
.>P 38 Moment calculations
MuL !u lff2
8
L 11.532
8
L ,2#+ k"$m
Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L 2#7 k"$m
MM+%;H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).
.>P +8 einforcement details
MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy
b d f ck
)
stL,3'#7 mm2
80
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
81/119
st* minimumL &85
fy
Jb J D L .85
415
J,5J3 L 2#,7 mm2
st* calWst* min
dopt , mm diameter bars#
"umber of barsL 2
H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y18 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force HuL wu l
214
L 11.53
2
L ,7#25 k"
"ominal shear stressL %u
b d
L 17250
150265
L #+3 N
mm2
Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M2 and stL235#5
mm2* \cL#5N
mm2
"ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* still nominal stirrups are pro!ided for
"ominal shear stressL Permissible hear trength#
81
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
82/119
HusL 0.87 fy A sv d
v
,725 L 0.87415 A sv 265
300
s!L 5+# mm2
-or a two legged 9 diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+ L ,#+9 mm2 Ws!
H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF 388 ;; "9" a( (P 78 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at #3m offset from both edges#
1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beamL ,#,25kN
m
C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
83/119
"egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2
2
L 1.1250.32
2
L #5 k"$m
Positi!e moment at mid spanL wl2
8
L 1.1252.42
8
L #9, k"$m
"et e6cess momentL #7' k"$m
Me6cess(#7' k"$m) VMu*member(2#7 k"$m)
H)n") "
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
84/119
.>P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth
dL (
15
L 5000
15
L 333#33 mm
DLdNeffecti!e co!erL 333#33N35L 3'9#33 mm[L 37 mm* dL335 mm
bL D:2L 37:2L,95[L 2 mm
.>P 28 1oad calculations
elf weightL concJ b J D L 25J#2J#37 L ,#95
kN
m
Dead weight of slabL concJ b J D L 25J,J#,+ L 3#5kN
m
1i!e 1oad L2kN
m
-loor -inish L ,kNm
.otal 1oad L 9#35kN
m
-actored 1oadL ,#5J9#35L,2#52[L,3kN
m
.>P 38 Moment calculations
MuL !u lff2
8
L 1352
8
L +#'25 k"$m
84
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
85/119
Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L ',#5 k"$m
MM+%; H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).
.>P +8 einforcement details
MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy
b d f ck
)
stL 3+3#,7 mm2
st* minimumL .85
fy
Jb J D L .85
415
J2J335 L ,37#23 mm2
st* calWst* min
dopt ,2mm diameter bars#
"umber of bars L 3
H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y12 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force HuL wu l
2
L 135
2
L 32#5 k"
85
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
86/119
"ominal shear stressL %u
b d
L 32500
200335
L #+95 N
mm2
Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M 2 and stL3+3#,7
mm2* \cL#3N
mm2
"ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stress#
HusL 0.87 fy A sv d
v
325 L 0.87415 A sv 335
300
s!L9#', mm2
-or a two legged 9 diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+L,#+9 mm2Ws!
H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF388 ;; "9" a( (
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
87/119
24 14.73
H)n") D)!+)"#%'n %( Sa!).
.>P 78 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at #3m offset from both edges#
1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beamL ,#95kN
m
C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
88/119
-%&. 4.1, D)#a%+( '! Ma%n )a; P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth
dL (20
L 300020
L ,5 mm
DLdNeffecti!e co!erL ,5N3 L ,9 mm
b L,5 mm
.>P 28 1oad calculations
elf weightL concJ b J DL 25J#,5 J #,9L#'75kNm
88
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
89/119
eight of brick masonr& wall abo!e plinth L masonr&J l J tL , J ,#55 J #,5L +#+2
kN
m
.otal 1oadL 5#,kN
m
-actored 1oadL uL,#5J5#,L7#'5[L9kN
m
.>P 38 Moment calculations
MuL !u lff2
8
L 832
8
L k"$m
Mu*limL #,39fckbd2 L #3,5 k"$m
MM+%;H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).
.>P +8 einforcement details
MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy
b d f ck
)
stL2+#99mm2
st* minimumL .85
fy
Jb J D L .85
415
J,5J,9 L 55#3 mm2
st* calWst* min
dopt ,mm diameter bars#
89
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
90/119
"umber of bars L 3
H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y18 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force HuL wu l
2
L 83
2
L ,2 k"
"ominal shear stressL %u
b d
L 12000
150150
L #53 N
mm2
Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M2 and stL235#5
mm2 *\cL #3N
mm2
"ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stressL Permissible hear trength#
HusL 0.87 fy A sv d
v
,2 L 0.87415 A sv 150
300
s!L9,#, mm2
-or a two legged 9 diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+L,#+9 mm2Ws!
H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF388 ;; "9" !'$ (
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
91/119
.>P '8 heck for deflection
?asic (
d
L 2
-or pt L #972* (%+5'$2* Pg8 39)
ktL ,#,
2J,#, W 2
22 28
H)n") D)!+)"#%'n %( Sa!).
.>P 78 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at #3 m offset from both edges#
1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beamL #'75kN
m
C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
92/119
H)n") "P ,8 dopt a preliminar& breadth and depth
dL (
20
L 3000
20
L 25 mm
DLdNeffecti!e co!erL 25N3L 29 mm
b L,5 mm
.>P 28 1oad calculations
92
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
93/119
elf weightL concJ b J DL 25J#,5 J #29L,#5kN
m
eight of brick masonr& wall abo!e plinth L masonr&J l J tL , J ,#55 J #,5L +#+2
kN
m
.otal 1oadL 5#+7kN
m
-actored 1oadL ,#5J5#+7L 9#2kNm
.>P 38 Moment calculations
MuL !u lff2
8
L 8.252
8
L 25#'25 k"$m
Mu*limL #,39fckbd2
L 25#975 k"$m
MM+%;H)n") a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).
.>P +8 einforcement details
MuL #97Jf&JstJd(,$ Ast fy
b d f ck
)
stL352#7+ mm2
st* minimumL .85
fy
Jb J D L .85
415
J,5J 29 L 9'#2 mm2
93
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
94/119
st* calWst* min
dopt ,mm diameter bars#
"umberof barsL 352#7+:79#5L+#+[L5
H)n") $'=%/%n& 2Y183Y18 a( #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( #' P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force HuL wu l
2
L 8.25
2
L 2#5 k"
"ominal shear stressL %u
b d
L 20500
150250
L #55 N
mm2
Permissible hear trength of concrete as per .able , % +5' for M2 and stL32#5
mm2*\cL#'2
N
mm2
>!en though "ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for
"ominal shear stressL Permissible hear trength#
HusL 0.87 fy A sv d
v
25 L 0.87415 A sv 250
300
s!L '9#,3 mm2
-or a two legged 9 diameter stirrup* 2J5#2+L ,#+9 mm2 Ws!
94
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
95/119
H)n") $'=%/) 2LYF388 ;; "9" !'$ (P 78 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at #3 m offset from both edges#
1oad on beam due to erectionL self weight of beamL ,#5
kN
m
C
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
96/119
Me6cess(2#++ k"$m) VMu*member(25#975 k"$m)
H)n") "
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
97/119
eight of the beam to rest upon it L wbeam
.otal load uL wselfN wbeam
.>P 38 Moment calculation
MuL !u lff2
2
Mu*limL #,39fckbd2
I! MM+%; a/'#)/ /%;)n(%'n( a$) (a!).
.>P +8 einforcement details
st* minimumL #2EJbJD
dopt ^ diameter bars#
"umber of bars Lara of on
A st ,min
.>P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force HuL !u l
2
"ominal shear stressL %u
b d
Permissible hear trength of concrete is referred from .able , % +5'82 using M
2 and st!alue#
97
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
98/119
%f "ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stressL Permissible hear trength#
%f "ominal shear stressW Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stress#
HusL 0.87 fy A sv d
v
s!is found from abo!e formula#
-or the selected stirrup* its area should alwa&s be greater than s!#
.>P '8 heck for bearing stresses
_br*calculatedL !bam
b l
_br*limitL
fck
/ & o & s * where -#=## is assumed to be 2#
%f _br*calculatedW _br*limitthen the adopted dimensions of the corbel are safe#
4.3.%.2 Design
.>P ,8 dopt preliminar& dimensions
bL #3 m
lL #5 m
98
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
99/119
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
100/119
"umber of barsL 101. 38
78.5
[L3
H)n") $'=%/%n& 3Y18 a( #' #)n(%'n (#))+ an/ 2Y a( '##'; P 58 Design of stirrups
hear force HuL !u l
2
L 6.150.3
2
L #2 k"
"ominal shear stressL %u
b d
L 920
300300
L #, N
mm2
Permissible hear trength of concrete is referred from .able , % +5' using M 2 and
stL 235#5 mm2* \cL #22
N
mm2
"ominal shear stressV Permissible hear trength* stirrups are pro!ided for "ominal
shear stressL Permissible hear trength#
HusL 0.87 fy A sv d
v
s!L 5+#9+ mm2
/ence pro!iding 21]9 as stirrups Ws!
.>P '8 heck for bearing stresses
_br*calculatedL!bam
b lL
1850000
300500L ,2#33
N
mm2
100
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
101/119
_br*limitL fck
/ & o & s
L 20
2
L , N
mm2
ince_br*calculated(,2#33N
mm2 ) W _br*limit(,
N
mm2 )* the adopted dimensions of the
corbel are safe#
-%&. 4.28 C'$)+ /)#a%+(
4.3.6 S+a
101
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
102/119
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
103/119
.>P 28 >ffecti!e depth of slab
pan:depth ratio L 29
>ffecti!e depth Ls#an
28
Pro!ide effecti!e co!er of 2 mm#
-ind o!er all depth#
.>P 38 1oads
elf weight of lab LconcreteJbJD L wself
1i!e 1oad (% 975 Part$2I Pg8 ) L 2kN
m2
-loor -inish L ,
kN
m2
Design P +8
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
104/119
"o "egati!e Moment due to absence of continuous edges#
Positi!e at Mid @ pan
Y& L efer %+5' @ 2I Pg8 , .able 2'
.>P 58 heck for depth
Mu#limL #,39fckbd2
.>P '8 einforcement (short ; long span)
Min# stL#,2E of 0ross area of cross section
Positi!e at mid span
MuL #97 f& st d
-ind st#
pacing should least of the following
,# 3d
2# 3 mm
Pro!ide distribution steel as per minimum steel#
.>P 78 heck for shear
onsidering the short span unit width of slab#
hear force Hu L wu l*
2
104
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
105/119
"ominal shear stress L %u
b d
efer table ,* % +5'82I Page8 73 for !alue of \c
%f \c W!* the slab is safe in shear#
.>P 98 heck for deflection
?asic (
dL 2
ktL (% +5'82* Page8 39)
Ma6 W ctual
%f ?asic J ktW actual then safe in deflection#
.>P 8 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at , m offset from edge in longer span and #5 m offset from edge inshorter span* at all four corners of slab#
1oad on slab due to erectionL self weight of slab
heck for dimensions8
"egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2
2
Positi!e moment at mid span L wl2
8
"et e6cess momentL "egati!e Moment[Positi!e Moment
105
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
106/119
%f Me6cessVMu*member then chosen dimensions are safe for erection stresses too#
4.3.&.3 Design
.>P ,8 .o determine the t&pe of slab
16L 3 m
1&L 5 m
fckL 2
N
mm2
f& L +,5
N
mm2
1&:16L ,#''7V 2 (.= ] 1?)
>nd condition L -our edges discontinuous
.>P 28 >ffecti!e depth of slab
pan:depth ratio L 29
>ffecti!e depth L ,7#,+ mm
Pro!ide effecti!e depth of ,2 mm* effecti!e co!er of 2 mm#
=!er all depth is ,+ mm
.>P 38 1oads
106
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
107/119
elf weight of lab LconcreteJbJD L25J,J#,+L 3#5
kN
m2
1i!e 1oad (% 975 Part$2I Pg8 ) L 2kN
m2
-loor -inish L ,
kN
m2
.otal load L '#5
kN
m2
Design
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
108/119
b) 1ong direction
"o "egati!e Moment due to absence of continuous edges#
Positi!e at Mid @ pan
Y& L #5'
M L #5' J , J 52
ML ,+ k"$m
.>P 58 heck for depth
Mu#limL #,39fckbd2
d L 7,#22 mm V ,2 mm* /ence chosen depth is safe#
.>P '8 einforcement (short ; long span)
Min# stL#,2E of 0ross area of cross sectionL ,'9 mm2
Positi!e at mid span
MuL #97 f& st d
,+ J ,'L #97 J+,5 Jst J ,2
stL 323#,3 mm2
pacing should least of the following
,# 3d L 3(,2) L3' mm2# 3 mm
st(pro)L32#7 mm2
P$'=%/) 18 ;; /%a;)#)$ a$( F 288 ;; "9" a( ;a%n (#))+.
108
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
109/119
Distribution steel
s per minimum steel*
stL ,'9 mm2
P$'=%/) ;; /%a;)#)$ a$( F 388 ;; "9" a( /%(#$%#%'n (#))+.
.>P 78 heck for shear
onsidering the short span unit width of slab#
hear force Hu
Lw
u
l*
2L
103
2 L ,5 k"
"ominal shear stress L %u
b d
L 15000
1000120
L #,7 N
mm2
ptL #29
(efer table ,* % +5'82I Page8 73)
\c L #3N
mm2 W ! (#,7
N
mm2 )
/ence hear afe
.>P 98 heck for deflection
?asic (
dL 2
109
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
110/119
-or pt L #29* (% +5'82* Page8 39)
ktL ,#2
Ma6 W ctual
?asic J ktW2,#+2
2J,#2 W 2,#+2
2+ W 2,#+2
/ence* safe in deflection#
.>P 8 heck for erection stresses
/ooks are pro!ided at , m offset from edge in longer span and #5 m offset from edge in
shorter span* at all four corners of slab as shown in -igure +#2,#
-%&. 4.21 H'' $'=%(%'n %n (+a(
110
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
111/119
1oad on slab due to erectionL self weight of slabL 52#5kN
m
heck for dimensions8
"egati!e moment at the edge due to cantile!er L wl2
2
L 52.50.52
2
L'#5' k"$m
Positi!e moment at mid span wl
2
8
L 52.522
8
L2'#25 k"$m
"et e6cess momentL ,#' k"$m
Me6cess(,#' k"$m) VMu*member(3#7++ k"$m)
H)n") "
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
112/119
4.3.'.1 Introduction
onnections are among the most essential parts in precast structures#
.heir performance relates to the structural limit states* as well as to manufacture*
erection and maintenance of the structure itself# Proper design of connections is one
major ke& to a successful prefabrication#
.he main purpose of the structural connections is to transfer forces
between the precast concrete elements in order to obtain a structural interaction
when the s&stem is loaded#
?& the abilit& to transfer forces* the connections should secure the
intended structural beha!ior of the superstructure and the precast subs&stems that are
integrated in it#
.his could for instance be to establish diaphragm action in precast floors
and walls* or cantile!er action in precast shafts# -or this reason the structural
connections should be regarded as essential and integrated parts of the structural
s&stem and the& should be designed accordingl& and with the same care as for the
precast concrete elements# %t is insufficient just to consider the connections as details
for site erection#
.he ad!antages that normall& are obtainable with prefabrication can be
lost with an inappropriate design and detailing of the structural connections#
112
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
113/119
.he general guidelines to be followed for effecti!e joints and
connections are8
%n foundation to column joints* the infill should be prepared with the use of
e6pansi!e cements so that no ca!it& formation takes place after h&dration#
ontinuit& bars should e6tend be&ond both the edges of the e6terior slab#
Dowels bars should e6tend be&ond the column and beam joint to both of the
sides#
?eams should not be casted completel& to lea!e pro!ision for e6tended
stirrups to be casted along with slabs for effecti!e connections between the
components#
4.3.'.2 )loor *o #eam +onnections
Details of t&pical bearing of a floor unit o!er the precast beam are shown
in -igure +#23 the stirrups of the precast beams are protruded and function as shear
connectors#
113
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
114/119
-%&. 4.23 -+''$ #' )a; "'nn)"#%'n(
4.3.'.3 #eam to column connections
.he bracket support for the beam o!er the column is shown in -igure 2#
tolerance of 2$3 cm is allowed at the seating of the beam o!er the bracket#
dowel bar inserted through the holes pro!ided in the bracket and the beam
ensures an effecti!e connection between them#
.he top reinforcing bars of the precast beams are connected to thecolumn
joint b& welding# ince onl& a few number of bars are welded* it is assumed
that the connection between the beam and the column is a rigid one at the
ser!iceabilit& stage* but beha!es as a hinged one at the ultimate stage
114
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
115/119
-%&. 4.24 B)a; #' "'+;n "'nn)"#%'n
4.3.'.4 )oundation to column connections
.he foundations usuall& cast as in$situ isolated footings as the local soil
conditions warrant#
115
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
116/119
.he bottom end of the precast column is connected to the foundation as shown in
-igure +#2+#
-%&. 4.25 C'+;n #' !''#%n& "'nn)"#%'n
4.3.'.% "roduction and erection
116
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
117/119
.he method of production depends on the total number of prefabricated
elements that are to be produced# .he components ma& be produced either in a factor&
on mass scale or in casting &ards located near the site and e4uipped with the necessar&plant and machiner
-or facilitating erection* lifting hooks are pro!ided in the precast floors and
beams# >rection e&es as pro!ided in the structural elements help in lifting them during
transportation and erection using temporar& bracing# .he hooks ha!e a t&pical design as
shown in -igure +#2+#
-%&. 4.26 H'' /)#a%+%n& !'$ #$an('$#a#%'n an/ )$)"#%'n
117
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
118/119
CHAPTER 5
CONCLSION
5.1 CONCLSION
.he project successfull& completes the design of modular houses using ad!anced
technolog& and a solution to 4uicker construction with economic ad!antages#
ompletion of the project has finall& helped in gaining !ital and practical
implementations in accordance with safet& and ser!iceabilit& of the designed
units#
5.2 -TRE SCOPE O- THE PROJECT
.he implementation of the project will be of a great help to the rising need of
4uicker construction and in the field of mass housing techni4ues#
%t will be a boon for the weaker sections of societ& where owning a house is still
a common dream and the economic ad!antage of the project would be effecti!el&
implemented#
118
-
7/24/2019 Report 1 Finale
119/119
Pro!isions for e6tension of plan for other suitabilit& issues is also included for
satisf&ing different functional needs#