rels. 205 lecture 3.1 neo-calvinism as a political tradition

52
Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Upload: crwys

Post on 19-Jan-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition. Back to the Enlightenment. Kant (1724-1804). Voltaire (1694-1778). The Liberal view of Society. Society is an organism that must develop naturally. Revolutionary Europe. French Revolution 1789 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Page 2: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Back to the Enlightenment

Kant(1724-1804)

Voltaire(1694-1778)

Page 3: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

The Liberal view of Society

Society is an organism that must develop naturally

Page 4: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Revolutionary Europe

French Revolution 1789Revolution in the Netherlands 1793Execution of Louis XVI 21 January 1793The Netherlands absorbed by France 1793Invasion of Germany 1796Napoleonic Wars 1798-1815War against Prussia 1806-1807Battle of Jena 14 October 1806Treaty of Tilsit July 7-9, 1807

Page 5: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Revolutionary view of Society

Society is a mechanism

Page 6: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

The Tide Turns

Napoleon invades Russia 1812Wars of Liberation 1813Battle of Leipzig 16-19 October 1813Congress of Vienna Sept. 1814- June 1815Final defeat of Napoleon 1815

Page 7: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Edmund Burke (1729-1797)

Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)

Page 8: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

The conservative view of society

Society is an organism that must be cultivated

Page 9: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Frederick Denison Maurice(1805-1872)

The Kingdom of God(1838)

Page 10: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Christian Socialism

A church which was looked upon, and almost looked upon itself, as a tool of the aristocracy …The Liberal proclamation which says, “Teach them …” was more genial and humane ... More impressive far was the speech of the Methodist and the Evangelical …

Page 11: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Jews for Jesus

Dorothea Veit(1763-1839)

Felix Mendelssohn(1809-1947)

Johan AugustNeander

(David Mendel1789-1850 )

Friedrich Julus Stahl(1802-1861)

Page 12: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Friedrich Julus Stahl(1802-1861)

Parties in Church and State

Page 13: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Willem Bilderdijk (1756-1831)

Page 14: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Abraham Capadosa(1795-1874)

Page 15: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Isaac de Costa(1798-1860)

Page 16: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

G. Groen van Prinsterer(1801-1876)

Page 17: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Christian Nationalism

van Prinsterer the LiberalSevice to William I1827-1827 Referendars to Cabinet of1829-1833 Secretary to the CabinetRevolt in Belgium 1830Breakdown and conversionHistorian and theroistPolitician

Page 18: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Anti-Revolutionary Party

Page 19: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Groen’s Co-Workers

Page 20: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer (1801-1876)

Unbelief and Revolution (1847)

Page 21: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Anti-Revolutionary Movement

Unbelief and Revolution (1847)Against the French Revolution

Page 22: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Christian Nationalism

van Prinsterer the LiberalService to William I1827-1827 Referendars to Cabinet of1829-1833 Secretary to the CabinetRevolt in Belgium 1830Breakdown and conversionHistorian and theoristPoliticianFounder of Anti-Revolutionary Movement

Page 23: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Anti-Revolutionary Thought

Unbelief leads to Revolution

Voltaire(1694-1778)

Page 24: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Revolution leads to Revolution

Page 25: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

The problem of Sovereignty

Tyrant - KingMonarchy

Oligarchs Republic

PeopleDemocracy

Chaos

Page 26: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Abraham Kuyper (1837-1920)

Lectures on Calvinism (1898)

Page 27: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Kuyper’s Achievement

Charlotte Yonge The Heir of RedclyffePolitician – 1869, 1874 in parliamentFree University of Amsterdam – 1880Die Standaard De HarautUnions etc.

Page 28: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Kuyper’s Achievement

Author – numerous booksLectures on Calvinism (1898)

Politician – 1869, 1874Parliament – 1874Prime Minister – 1901-1904

Founded:Free University of Amsterdam – 1880Die Standaard De HarautUnions etc.

Page 29: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Kuyper’s Theory

The influence of Calvinism in our political development ... sprang from its root principle ... The Sovereignty of the Triune God over the whole Cosmos, in all its spheres and kingdoms, visible and invisible ...

Page 30: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Sphere Sovereignty

In a Calvinistic sense we understand hereby, that the family, the business, science, art and so forth are all social spheres, which do not owe their existence to the state, and which do not derive the law of their life from the superiority of the state, but obey a high authority within their own bosom; an authority which rules, by the grace of God, just as the sovereignty of the State does.

Page 31: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

CollegeChurch

God

Arts Business

School Family

Trade

Page 32: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Church

Traditional View

StateState

Page 33: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Kuyper’s View

State Society

Mechanistic Organic

Page 34: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Kuyper’s Thesis

This involves the antithesis between State and Society, but upon this condition, that we do not conceive this society as a conglomerate, but as analyzed in its organic parts, to honor, in each of these parts, the independent character, which appertains to them ...

Page 35: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Mechanistic and Organic

These different developments of social life have nothing above themselves but God, and... the State cannot intrude here ... Keep in mind the difference in grade between the organic life of society and the mechanical character of the government. Whatever among men originates directly from creation is possessed of all the data for its development, in human nature as such. You see this at once in the family ...

Page 36: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Kuyper’s Co-Workers

Page 37: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Herman Bavinck (1854-1921)

Philosophy of Revelation,1909Our Reasonable Faith, 1906-1911

Page 38: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Herman Dooyeweerd (1894-1977)

a

Page 39: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Dooyeweerd’s Works

New Critique of Theoretical Thought, Nutley, Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing, 1953-1958

Roots of Western culture; Pagan, Secular and Christian options, Wedge Publishing Company, Toronto, Canada, 1979

http://www.isi.salford.ac.uk/dooy/index.htmlwww.freewebs.com/ reformational/http://www.redeemer.on.ca/Dooyeweerd-Centre/http://www.members.shaw.ca/jgfriesen/Mainheadings/Dooyeweerd.html

Page 40: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Cosmic Time

God

Cosmic Time

Creation

LAW

Page 41: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Naïve Experience

TimeExperience

Aspects of reality

Page 42: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Analysis and Synthesis

Rational analysis Lack of synthesis

Page 43: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

The Archemedian Point

The Heart as the human center

The need for synthesis

The problem of diversity

Page 44: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Religious Ground Motives

Meaning is found in God

or

an aspect of created reality

Page 45: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Ground Motives

The point of synthesis for philosophers

Materialism

Vitalism

Aesthetics

Etc.

Page 46: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Christian Diversity

Page 47: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Ground Motives of Western Thought

MFGM - The Matter-Form motive of the ancient Greeks (dualistic).

CFR - The Creation-Fall-Redemption motive of Hebrew thought.

NGGM - The Nature-Grace motive of Mediaeval Roman Catholicism (dualistic).

NFGM - The Science-Personality motive of the Renaissance, Enlightenment and Modern times (dualistic).

Page 48: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

The Problem of Dualism

FormNatureScience

MatterGracePersonality

Page 49: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Christian Complexity

Creation-Fall-Redemption

God is sovereign

Everything is under God’s Law

Creation is diverse

Human problems are moral

Page 50: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Law Spheres

Page 51: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

R.J. Rushdoony1916-2001

Chalcedon Foundation- 1965

Page 52: Rels. 205 Lecture 3.1 Neo-Calvinism as a Political Tradition

Francis Schaeffer (1912-1984)