red brand canners
DESCRIPTION
Red Brand Canners - Case studyTRANSCRIPT
RED BRAND CANNERS Case Study-Somaskhandan [10BM60087]-Sathiyaseelan M [10BM60080]- Renjith R[10BM60070]- Satyam Khatri[10BM60081]
OverviewProblem Overview.Cooper’s suggestion.Tucker’s suggestion.Meyers suggestion.Applying Gordon’s Data.Comparison.Conclusion.
Problem OverviewRed Brand Canners – company that canned and
distributed variety of fruit and vegetable products.
Product inspection estimates.Total crop – 3 million lb.20 % Grade A.[9 points per pound]80% Grade B.[5 points per pound]
3 tomato products.Canned tomatoes.Tomato Paste.Tomato Juice.
LP formulation
Grade A Grade B
Whole canned tomatoes
WA WB
Tomato Juice JA JB
Tomato Paste PA PB
Values in Pounds
Cooper’s Suggestion0.40 / 18 = 0.0222 [Contribution per pound for Whole tomatoes of Grade A].
Objective function = 0.08222*WA + 0.08222*WB + 0.066*JA + 0.066*JB + 0.074*PA + 0.074*PB - 180000 ;
WA +JA + PA <=600000;WB +JB + PB <=2400000;WA +JA + PA + WB +JB + PB <= 3000000;JA + JB <= 1000000; Demand for JuicePA + PB <= 2000000; Demand for PasteWA + WB <=1800000; Demand for Whole Tomatoes
Tucker’s Suggestion
Objective function = 0.08222*WA + 0.08222*WB + 0.066*JA + 0.066*JB + 0.074*PA + 0.074*PB - 180000;
WA +JA + PA <=600000; WB +JB + PB <=2400000; WA +JA + PA + WB +JB + PB <= 3000000; WA + WB <= 800000; JA + JB <= 1000000; PA + PB <= 2000000; WA>=3*WB; 3*JA >= JB;
Minimum quality for
In Points per Pound
Whole Tomatoes
8
Tomato Juice 6
Tomato Paste 5
Meyer’s SuggestionObjective function = -.0055*WA - .0055*WB +
0.004*JA + 0.004*JB + 0.022*PA + 0.022*PB;WA +JA + PA <=600000;WB +JB + PB <=2400000;WA +JA + PA + WB +JB + PB <= 3000000;JA + JB <= 1000000;PA + PB <= 2000000;WA + WB <=1800000;
Gordon’s DataAdditional 80000 pounds of Grade A tomatoes
are available at 8.5 cents per pound.WA +JA + PA <=680000;WB +JB + PB <=2400000;WA +JA + PA + WB +JB + PB <= 3080000;Objective function = 0.08222*WA +
0.08222*WB + 0.066*JA + 0.066*JB + 0.074*PA + 0.074*PB - 180000 - (0.085 * 80000);
Comparison
Coopers Suggestion Tuckers Suggestion
Meyers Suggestio
nW/O
Gordon’s Data
With Gordon's
Data
W/O Gordon’s
Data
With Gordon's
Data
W/O Gordon’s
Data
WA 0 0 525000 615000 0
WB 1800000 1800000 175000 205000 0
JA 0 0 75000 65000 600000
JB 0 0 225000 1950000 400000
PA 600000 680000 0 0 0
PB 600000 600000 2000000 2000000 2000000
ComparisonWithout
Incorporating Gordon’s Data
Incorporating Gordon’s Data
Cooper’s Suggestion 56796 55916
Tuckers ‘s Suggestion 45354 45780
Meyer’s Suggestion 48000 -
ConclusionOnly a small portion of tomato crop was
quality A and some quality constraints should be maintained for the products, Coopers suggestion is not valid.
Red Brand has already signed contract agreement topurchase 3 millions pounds tomato at a cost of 6 cents average. Myers calculated tomato cost separately for grade A and B which had an impact in his calculation.
Tucker’s Suggestion along with Gordon’s data yields a maximum contribution.
Thank You