reallocating resources to focused factories: a case study in chemotherapy peter vanberkel, phd...
TRANSCRIPT
Reallocating Resources to Focused Factories: A Case
Study in Chemotherapy
Peter Vanberkel, PhD Candidate
University of Twente
Netherlands Cancer institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Focused Factories History
US Factory in the 1960
FocusedFactory
focus, simplicity and repetition breeds competence. – Skinner 1973
We produce everything!We produce Nothing Well
We produce fewer things!We produce them all Well
Pomegranate Phone: UltimateDo EVERYTHING phone(www. PomegranatePhone.com)
iPhone: Does less but doesEverything Well
Focus on Service? Or Patient? Or Mix?
Breast Cancer
Skin CancerColon Cancer
Lung Cancer
Prostate Cancer
OR
Radiology
Research Question General: How can we quantify the impact of decentralizing a centralized service?
Chemotherapy Case Study: Design a decentralized service (Breast Cancer and Non Breast Cancer) that maintains the performance of the existing centralized department
Presentation Focus…
Chemotherapy (Existing)
Breast CancerChemotherapy
Non Breast CancerChemotherapy
Economies of Scale?or
Economies of Focus?
About Chemotherapy Dept.
Appt.Request
Pnt. Arrives
Pnt. inWait Room
Pnt. inBed for
TreatmentPnt.
Leaves
Appointment:• Clinic Runs Smoothly when beds areUtilized at 90%
• Nurses can manage• Waiting Room time is reasonable
• Currently 30 beds
Access Time:< 5% of patientsShould wait morethan 1 days
F/UNew
About Chemotherapy Dept.
Appt.Request
Pnt. inWait Room
Pnt. inBed for
TreatmentPnt.
Leaves
F/UNew
Black Box
Service Rate: (Patients / day)Depends on:
• Appointment Length• Number of Beds
Arrival Rate: (Patients / day)Poisson(70.2)
Pnt. Arr
Output / Performance:• Access Time• Bed Utilization
Service Rate
P1 P2 P3 P4
Expo (1/λ)Capacity Distribution inPatients / day: Poisson(λ)
Expo (1/λ) Expo (1/λ)Capacity Distribution inPatients / day:Int[Poisson(λ)/2]
Beds Poisson
1 2
)(
Appt. Length = 90 mins Appt. Length = 60
Model Output / Performance Lqn = (Lqn-1+ Arrivalsn – Servedn)+
Wait Time Distribution
Utilization = Beds Used / Total Beds
Scenario
Existing Chemotherapy
BC Chemotherapy
No Efficiency Improvement Expected Due to Focus
Model InputsService Rate: 2.7 Pnts/dayArrival Rate: 72.1 Pnts/day
Beds: 30
Model OutputsBed Utilization: 90%Access time >1 day: <5%
Service Rate: 2.5 Pnts/day
NBC Chemotherapy
Service Rate: 2.8 Pnts/day
Bed Utilization: 90%Access time >1 day: <5%
Bed Utilization: 90%Access time >1 day: <5%
Beds: ?
Beds: ?
Arrival Rate: 29.6 Pnts/day
Arrival Rate: 42.6 Pnts/day
Breast Cancer Chemo
Beds Bed Util% of Patients with
Access Time > 1
17 96.2% 27.9%
18 91.1% 9.1%
19 86.8% 3.8%TargetsMet
Non Breast Cancer Chemo
Beds Bed Util% of Patients with
Access Time > 1
11 96.6% 34.9%
12 88.7% 9.1%
13 81.5% 2.5%TargetsMet
Results
Existing Chemotherapy
BC Chemotherapy
Beds: 30 NBC Chemotherapy
Beds: 19
Beds: 13
EqualPerformance
Centralized Service Decentralized Service
Case Study Conclusion A decentralized Chemotherapy Service requires a total of 32 beds to ensure the same performance as the existing 30 bed centralized Service
General Considerations for FF1. Proportional Sizes of the decentralized
groups
2. Variability in Appointment Length
3. Efficiency Improvement Due to Focus
4. Different Performance expectations for different patients
Advantages of Methodology Uses Data that is commonly available from outpatient Scheduling SystemsApplicable in other Focused Factory Decisions Can determine the min Economies of Focus Applicable in other outpatient environments Can be easily adapted to answering a variety of questions related to different treatment plans for a certain segment of the patient population
Other Applications Impact of Different Drugs with faster infusion times
Impact of Less Frequent Return Appts
Impact of Different Working hours
Impact of Growing Demands
Impact of Dedicated Lab service
Future Research Determine the combined advantages of multiple departments decentralized to a Focused Factory.