rdw can be a useful additional marker in diagnosing crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis
TRANSCRIPT
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
RDW Can Be a Useful Additional Marker in Diagnosing Crohn’sDisease and Ulcerative Colitis
Tamas Molnar Æ Klaudia Farkas Æ Zoltan Szepes Æ Ferenc Nagy ÆTibor Nyari Æ Tibor Wittmann
Published online: 16 July 2008
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008
To the Editor
Clarke et al. [1] recently published a study on the potential
role of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) as a marker
for differentiating Crohn’s disease (CD) from ulcerative
colitis (UC). The authors examined the initial computer-
based data of their newly diagnosed patients and found a
slight, but statistically significant difference in favor of CD.
They conclude that RDW may prove to be a clinically
effective marker for differentiating CD from UC. However,
a number of questions are immediately raised: (1) because
RDW is highly dependent on iron level and blood loss, is
there any link between the activity status of inflammatory
bowel disease (IBD) and RDW level? Can the RDW dif-
ferentiate CD from UC in both the active state and in
remission? Does the change in RDW during the disease
course show any link with the laboratory activity markers
or clinical activity?
In view of these questions, we carried out a comple-
mentary study to retrospectively evaluate whether RDW
can facilitate clinicians in differentiating CD and UC both
in the active state and in remission and whether there is a
demonstrable correlation between RDW and the activity of
IBD.
We analyzed data on 176 IBD patients, including 92
patients with CD (57 females, 35 males; mean age
37.5 years, range 17–73 years) and 84 with UC (43
females, 41 males; mean age 44.4 years, range 16–81
years). The RDW values (reference range 11–14%), serum
iron level (reference range 6.6–26 lmol/l), C-reactive
protein level (CRP, reference range \5 mg/l), erythrocyte
sedimentation rate (ESR, reference range 1–20 mm/h) and
CD activity index (CDAI)/clinical activity index (CAI)
measured in both an active and an inactive disease period
of each patient were assessed. The active phase of the
diseases were defined as a CDAI [150/CAI [4 and/or a
CRP [5 mg/l and an ESR [20 mm/h. The data were
analyzed using the Pearson’s chi-square test, Fischer’s
exact test and one-sided Fischer’s exact test.
The RDW was increased in 53.2% of the patients with
inactive CD versus 36.8% of the patients with inactive
UC, representing a statistically significant difference
(average values 14.3 vs. 13.8; P = 0.05), while no sig-
nificant correlation was detected in the active period of
the diseases (14.7 vs. 14.4; P = 0.393). Increased RDW
correlated significantly with the low values of serum iron
level in CD patients and with serum iron level, CRP, ESR
in UC patients in remission—but not in CD patients with
the active form of the disease. Mean RDW was signifi-
cantly increased in the active form of both CD
(RDW [14%; P = 0.0019) and UC (RDW [14%;
P = 0.0263) and also in inactive CD cases (RDW [14%;
P = 0.0415) compared to the normal values of RDW
(RDW 11–14%).
Our results suggest that the RDW value may differ-
entiate between UC and CD in patients when these
diseases are in remission or inactive, but not when they
are active, which is clinically the more important time
for a reliable diagnostic tool. Since RDW reveals a sig-
nificant change with clinical activity, it could be a useful
T. Molnar (&) � K. Farkas � Z. Szepes � F. Nagy � T. Wittmann
1st Department of Medicine, University of Szeged,
Szeged, Hungary
e-mail: [email protected]
T. Nyari
Department of Medical Informatics, University of Szeged,
Szeged, Hungary
123
Dig Dis Sci (2008) 53:2828–2829
DOI 10.1007/s10620-008-0345-4
and inexpensive additional activity marker and also
facilitate the diagnosis of IBD. We agree with Clarke
et al. [1] that future evaluations will determine the exact
value of RDW alongside serologic markers in routine
diagnostic tests.
Reference
1. Clarke K, Sagunarthy R, Kansal S (2008) RDW as an additional
marker in inflammatory bowel disease/undifferentiated colitis. Dig
Dis Sci. Epub 8 Feb 2008
Dig Dis Sci (2008) 53:2828–2829 2829
123