rd2003-030 system enhancements. system enhancements, rd2003-030, priority 4 improve and enhance the...
TRANSCRIPT
RD2003-030 System Enhancements
System Enhancements, RD2003-030, Priority 4
Improve and enhance the performance and/or add value to existing systems through the application of existing or new technologies
Priority Manager DescriptionRD2003-030 System Enhancements 4 1.95 Popplestone
a Drilplex - inhibitor/lubricant/FLC 0.25 0.60 Cliffe Develop additives to increase the technical application of the DRILPLEX system.
b HTHP Sildril 0.02 0.75 AlfordEstablish the temperature and weight performaqnce envelope
of the Sildril system using all available company additives and new ones as they become available
c Low Cost Ecotrol 0.1 0.55 Chapman To source a product that delivers comparable technical performance at a minimum 20% improvement in cost
d Polymer stabilizer for HT WBM 0.2 0.05 BallardGenerate further lab data to support the existing evidence
that Gallic Acid is an effective WBM Temperature Stabiliser
Manpower Project timeline
RD2003-030A Drilplex
RD2003-030A - Drilplex
DescriptionDescription Develop additives to increase the technical application of the DRILPLEX
system. Technical targets are: enhanced chemical shale inhibition, better fluid loss control and increased lubricity. Additives should not have a significant adverse effect on fluid properties and are low cost.
ApproachApproach Compatibility study using commercially available, low cost, regionally
available additives. Include new technology additives where appropriate.
DeliverablesDeliverables Effective shale inhibitor package for the DRILPLEX system (end Q2). Filtration control additive, better cost/performance than FLOPLEX (Q3). List of candidate lubricants from compatibility study. Temperature limitation of the DRILPLEX HDD system determined (Q4).
2003-030A - MSP Gantt Chart
ID Task Name
1 Project Authorization
9 Phase 1: Shale inhibition
10 Review background work
11 QC bentonite/ Standard mixing procedure
12 Compatibility tests with polymeric shale inhibitors
13 Compatibility tests with K salts
14 Compatibility tests with shale swelling inhibitors
15 Meeting with Huntsman
16 Order/ cut Oxford clay blocks
17 Inhibition bench marking tests
18 Long term mud stability tests/ limitations
19 Recommendations to Marketing
20 Phase 2: Improve fluid loss control
21 Evaluate alternative FLCA's
22 List of new FLCA's
23 Phase 3: Lubricant Testing
24 Lubricant compatibility tests
25 Environmental registration (new products)
26 Recommendations for LEM III testing
27 LEM III Testing (ETC)
28 Recommendations to Marketing
29 Phase 4
30 Determine temperature limitation of Drilplex HDD
31 Phase 5: Further Documentation
16/04
01/07
05/08
29/08
29/09
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec JanQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
Resource: 6 months Time spent: 3 months 40% complete
128
76
139
121
106104
114
5.515.7
2819
6 7.522.7
Base 3% KCl 2.8%K2CO3
4.3% Kcitrate
0.9%TKPP
1.7%TKPP
3.4%TKPP
API FL (mL) YP
1179
3470
2754
1557
4968
63216646
Base 3% KCl 2.8%K2CO3
4.3% Kcitrate
0.9%TKPP
1.7%TKPP
3.4%TKPP
Hardness (g/mm)
RD2003-030A - Drilplex
Potassium Salts in fresh water-DRILPLEX
Viscosity hump/ transient flocculation effect with all K salts, except TKPP. Hardness data from Oxford clay cubes after recovery from fluids (150°F/ 16hrs).
89
6255
28
64
5.5 9.5 8.6 11 9
Base 1.5%EMI-733
3% EMI-733
1.5%EMI-578
3% KLA-CURE
API FL (mL) YP
1066
3611
5278
46984145
Base 1.5%EMI-733
3% EMI-733
1.5%EMI-578
3% KLA-CURE
Hardness (g/mm)
EMI-733 and KLA-CURE have minimal effect on fluid properties. EMI-578 destroys DRILPLEX rheology.
RD2003-030A - Drilplex
Amine based Hydration Inhibitors in fresh water-DRILPLEX
Summary of Progress/DeviationsSummary of Progress/Deviations TKPP, EMI-733 and KLA-CURE show the most promise as shale
hydration inhibitors. GLYDRIL range of glycols promote foaming, and are ineffective
in fresh water fluids. Increasing the DRILPLEX concentration does not improve
chemical shale inhibition. Potassium salts lead to an increase in fluid loss, and transient
flocculation of fresh water based fluids. Benefits of HIBTROL and other polymeric inhibitors are marginal Possible new material may invalidate some of this work
Next StepNext Step Compare performance of TKPP, EMI-733 and KLA-CURE using
Foss Eikeland clay. Accretion tests with TKPP, etc. Final recommendations after long term ageing tests (4 days). Proceed to Phase 2.
RD2003-030A - Drilplex
RD2003-030B Sildril
DescriptionDescription This project will define the density and temperature limits of the SILDRIL
system and seek to identify products, which can be used to enhance its performance at higher temperatures. Specific targets include 12 ppg Sildril stable to 360F and fluids stable at mud weights of 16-18 ppg
ApproachApproach
Compilation of prior field and laboratory data. HTHP density matrix testing of existing products to determine performance limits at different mud weights. Screening of HT products to seek to extend system perfprmance.
DeliverablesDeliverables Comprehensive report compiled from lab and field data defining the HT
performance limits of the Sildril system at defined mud weight. Formulations to meet the field requirements of 12 ppg at 360F and 16-18
ppg.
RD2003-030B – HT Sildril
2003-030B - MSP Gantt Chart
Resource: 9 months Time spent: 6 days 5% complete
ID Task Name Duration
1 Prepare project proposal 5 days
2 Project Proposal approval 1 day
3 Evaluation of conventional additives 60 days
4 Establish the green zone 20 days
5 Evaluation of HT additives 90 days
6 Establish yellow and green zones 20 days
7 Correlation of Lab and fiedl data 10 days
8 Final report with charts and recommendations 5 days
9 Report approval 2 days
14/04
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter
Temperature limit
70
90
110
130
150
170
190
1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9
Mud weight S.G.
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
Summary of Progress/DeviationsSummary of Progress/Deviations Project just getting going Technical Service work in Stavanger has already pushed
performance limits to 325F at 11ppg. This fluid successfully applied in an unspecified country
Project will clearly define where Sildril can and cannot be used. There is significant technical risk the field requirements will not
be met fully
Next StepNext Step Start lab work
RD2003-030B – HT Sildril
RD2003-030C Low Cost Ecotrol
RD2003-030C – Low Cost Ecotrol
DescriptionDescription To source a product that delivers comparable technical
performance at a minimum 20% improvement in cost over Ecotrol.
Additional aims are to obtain improved mud make-up in cold, low shear conditions and improved HTHP performance.
ApproachApproach Market survey: Web search and existing manufacturer
contacts Mud tests in “Zero FL” and HTHP OBMs Concentration profiles to assess cost effectiveness.
DeliverablesDeliverables Report and recommendation on alternative products (Q3)
Resource: 0.55 man year Time spent: 1 month 25% complete
RD2003-030C – MSP Gantt Chart
RD2003-030C – Low Cost Ecotrol
HighlightsHighlights
1111..55 ppppgg VVeerrssaacclleeaann MMuudd TTeesstt RReessuullttss
* 35 ppb Hymod Prima contamination ** trace water
Product Product conc. (ppb)
PV/YP @ 49 C
BHR AHR ESV AHR
HTHP@121C
(ml)
Base - 19/14 19/15 664 4.0 DP9-8460 DP204-9593 Alcomer 274
5.0 3.75 2.5 5.0 * 9.0 5.0
20/17 24/23 20/15 22/21 20/14 22/20 25/25 38/37 16/16 17/15 26/30 31/38
921 789 810 751 726 782
0.8 1.8 2.2 2.8
2.8** 2.8
Baystal T7730
4.0 6.0
18/19 19/21 18/17 21/18
808 739
2.8 2.4
Exp D110-02C 2.0 23/22 21/25 787 2.0 EMI 603 2.0
3.0 17/17 20/15 19/14 20/13
769 694
2.2 2.6
Ecotrol
2.0 2.0*
22/19 25/25 28/29 36/36
883 838
1.2 3.8
Summary of Progress/DeviationsSummary of Progress/Deviations 7 Candidate Materials identified and tested so far
benchmarked against Ecotrol Screened in 11.5 ppg and 16.5 ppg Versaclean fluids Appear at this stage to have a 10% cost advantage in 11.5
ppg Versaclean
Next StepNext Step Continue product screen Take on the best materials for testing in HTHP fluids
RD2003-030C – Low Cost Ecotrol
RD2003-030D Polymer Stabiliser
RD2003-030D – Polymer Stabiliser
DescriptionDescription To determine the efficiency of Gallic Acid as a
temperature stabiliser for mainstream polymers in various Candidate M-I fluid systems and to provide sufficient information for a patent memo
ApproachApproach Conduct screening tests and gather evidence of
product efficacy in generic mud systems bench marking against untreated fluids
Determine benefit or otherwise of different alkalinity sources in the test fluids
DeliverablesDeliverables Report on test findings and submit patent memo
by end Q2
Resource: 0.05 man year Time spent: 2 month 80% complete
RD2003-030D – MSP Gantt Chart
RD2003-030D – Polymer Stabiliser
Fluid Properties
Sample Variations
NaOH Buffered Base (BHR) 10.5 30 10 8 11 -
NaOH Buffered Base (AHR) 8.6 10 3 2 3 39.7
NaOH Buffered Base (AHR)
+ 1g gallic acid
NaOH Buffered Base (AHR)
+ 2g gallic acid
9.6
3rpm
4
39.1 16
10 sec. gel 30min. API
4
55
Fluid Properties Before and After Hot Rolling @ 300°F for 16 hrs
9.1
YPMud pH
58.9 18
6rpm
Base gives high FL and large drop in YP
Fluids containing GA have much lower fluid loss and less drop in YP
Highlight – typical synthetic polymer WB FluidBenefits seen in
Flopro
Glydril
HT synthetic polymer
HT PAC starch fluid
No benefits seen in
Sildril
Dipro
Summary of Progress/DeviationsSummary of Progress/Deviations Gallic Acid tested in HT formulations of Flopro, Dipro,
Sildril, Starch PAC, Glydril and HT synthetic polymer Gallic acid works well in monovalent salt systems NaOH neutralised salt gives very good results Optimum ratio of MgO:GA in a RDF enhances rheology Increases temperature tolerance of PAC and synthetic
polymer based FLA to in excess of 300°F Raises temperature limit of starch based FLA from 250°F
towards 300°F Work on ongoing in Houston and Stavanger Patent application underway Additional time used as original allocation not sufficient
Next StepNext Step Complete screening with Summer School Student report
and transfer technology
RD2003-030D – Polymer Stabiliser