rating assessment of students on internal diseases : traditional or innovative form?
DESCRIPTION
Rating assessment of students on internal diseases : traditional or innovative form?. Ass.prof. I. Khlopina. Internal medicine courses. Faculty’s therapy. Propaedeutics of internal diseases. Hospital’s therapy. Polyclinic therapy. Traditional 4- points form of student’s knowledge control. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Rating assessment of students on internal
diseases: traditional or innovative form?
Ass.prof. I. Khlopina
Internal medicine courses
Faculty’s therapyPropaedeuticsof internal diseases
Hospital’s therapy Polyclinic therapy
Traditional 4-points form of student’s knowledge control
• Questioning at practical lessons• Test controls• Clinical test cases discussion• Writing of patient’s history• Exam
Limitations of traditional 4-points form of student’s knowledge control
• Absence of systematic conduction of control activities
• Subjectiveness of control mark• Occasion in getting tasks and questions for control
test
Introduction of rating system of student’s knowledge control
• Federal Law on higher education (№ 125 from 22 August 1996)
• Methodic recommendations of Ministry of Education of Russia from 11 July 2002 №2654 «About experiment on introduction of rating system of student’s knowledge control in Universities»
Rating
Usually Rating is concidered to be an «accumulated mark», or «mark in its
historical development» In universities Rating means quantity
measure, shown in multi-points scale and is integrally characterizing the student’s
knowledge and competence
Rating system takes into account:
• Active and rhythmic self-work of a student during a semester
• Presentation of test control tasks at strict scheduled time-schedule
• Concideration of “previous study successes” of a student• Information on lectures and classes visited by a student• «optional» training program
Stages of introduction of rating system of student’s knowledge control
• Development of methodology based on state education standards
• Several discussions on Chairs, Faculty’s Council and at Methodic conference of NSMU
• Intruduction of rating system on Chairs starting from 2000.• Further perfectioning of rating system – introduction of
“through-out” rating system on all courses of internal diseases (2003)
Calculation of pointsChair No of study hours Max points
Propaedeutics 205 (23%) 186 (24%)
Faculty’s therapy 163 (17%) 132 (17%)
Hospital therapyV yearVI year
133 (14%) 278 (30%)
107 (14%)196 (25%)
Polyclinic therapy 127 (14%) 138 (17%)
Total 917 759
Calculation of points “Unified Rating System of knowledge control in internal diseases”
№ Chair Excellent Good Satisfactory
1 Propaedeutics 167(90%)
148(80%)
130(70%)
2 Faculty’s therapy 118(90%)
105(80%)
92(70%)
3 Hospital therapy V year 96(90%)
84(79%)
92(66%)
VI year 176(90%)
146(76%)
121(62%)
4 Polyclinic therapy 124(90%)
103(75%)
83(60%)
5 Total 681(90%)
586(77%)
518(65%)
Scheme of points calculation in propaedeutics
Activity Max No of points
«General Care» - test control of out-coming knowledge 5Visiting lectures 26Visiting practice 30
Results of topic-end control 30Assessment of topic-end skills 30
Final testing 10Final skills control 10
Points for patient history 10Exam-conversation 15
Exam - ECG 5Exam – laboratory tests 5
Bonus points 10Total 186
Protocol of rating marks in group №1
ФИО Оценка
практики
Остаточныезнания
Факультативные
лекции
Курсовые
лекции
Посещение
занятий
Оценки
семинаров
Самостоятельная
работа
Практические умения ИТК Поощрит.баллы
Внутренние
болезни
ЭВН
Законодательство
Диагностика
Лечение
Мед. документ
Диспансеризация
Рецепты
Санпросвет. работа
Поликлиника
Скорая помощь
ЭВН
Доклад
больного
Курсовая
работа
Иванов С.Н.
Конев Р. К.
Шульга Н. Р.
Янсон К. Т.
Average rating point among therapy’s graduates in 2011
6 12
28
3915
Отлично (более 90%)
Хорошо (87-89%)
Хорошо (84-86%)
Хорошо (80-83%)
Удовлетворительно(более 70%)
Correspondence of points in rating system and in State Exam
Rating points in therapy
Through-out rating point in therapy (% of
students)
Exam mark State exam (% of students)
Over 90% 6% Excellent 9%
87-89% 12% good 9%
84-86% 15% good 15%
80-83% 28% good 13%
Over 70% 39% satisfactory 54%
Stimulating student’s activity
Granting the President’s bourse
Granting the University’s bourse
Increasing main bourse
Free-of-charge subscription to newspapers, journalsGranting Certificate of Merit
Granting possibility to attend PhD courses
Granting interesting practice
Results of education
Qualification modelof specialist’s training
CompetenceModel of specialist’s
trainingEvolution shift
Knowledge and skills
COMPETENCEReadiness to apply
Knowledge andPerson’s qualities
• Self-evaluation – to define the level of self-competence• Portfolio of the Graduate: his personal successes in studying
and student’s life are marked (science, culture, sports, social life)
New methods of evaluation of formed professional competence
Correspondence of points from different systems of student’s evaluation
Mark Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
Traditional 2 2+ 3 3+ 4 5 5+
% Менее 50
51-69 70-75 76-79 80-89 90-95 96-100
ECTS F FX E D C B A
Points 0-3 4-5 6 7 8 9 10
Rating system:
• Serves for development of systematic approach to studying
• Corresponds to renovation of the system of higher education
• Rating system must show not only indicators of professional and scientific skills, but also student’s personal successes
Thank you for attention!