radiative recombination of bare nuclei and ions in electron cooling system a.v. philippov, a.b....
TRANSCRIPT
RADIATIVE RECOMBINATION OF BARE NUCLEI AND IONS IN ELECTRON COOLING SYSTEM
A.V. Philippov, A.B. Kuznetsov, I.N. Meshkov
Veksler and Baldin Laboratory of High Energy Physics
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11),
September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 2/22
OUTLINE
Introduction1 Analysis of experimental data of radiative recombination (RR) rates
for bare nuclei2 Analysis of experimental data of RR rates for intermediate charge
state of ions3 RR beam lifetime and cooling timeConclusion
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 3
INTRODUCTION
Review of experimental results and their comparison with theoretical approaches is presented in this talk. We consider two essential cases for NICA:
– Recombination of bare gold nuclei in the NICA cooling system,– Recombination of intermediate charge state of gold ions in the
Booster cooling system.Based on these comparisons we evaluated the contribution of the RR losses of intermediate charge state of gold ions: Au32+, Au33+, Au43+, Au51+, Au61+, Au68+ and Au69+ during their acceleration in the Booster and the beam lifetime of the gold bare nuclei Au79+ in NICA.
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 4/22
1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 00 .1
0 .5
1 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
5 0 .0
E , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
08
cm3 s
e H e 2 H e 1 Z U2 Z He
2
e C 6 C 5 Z U2 Z C
2
e N 7 N 6 Z U2 Z N
2
e N e 10 N e 9 Z U2 Z Ne
2
e U 92 U 91 e U 92 U 91
1 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATES FOR BARE NUCLEI
RR rates vs. the electron relative energy ΔE, experiments: TSR, CRYRING, ESR. Red solid line — theoretical models of H.A. Kramers [Phil. Mag. V. 46. 1923. P. 836.], black solid line — R. Schuch [Phys. Rev. А. V. 45. N. 11. 1992. P. 7894-7905.].
Black dashed line is the fit of the formula above.
Fitted
Fitted1 1
1
1
8
3 8
,
,Ry
.
Z Z Z Z
Z Z
E f E
E bf E a
E
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 5/22
1 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATES FOR BARE NUCLEI(Contnd)
1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 00 .1
0 .5
1 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
5 0 .0
E , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
08
cm3 s
e S i14 S i13 Z U2 Z Si
2
e C l17 C l16 Z U2 Z Cl
2
e A r18 A r17 Z U2 Z Ar
2
e B i83 B i82 Z U2 Z Bi
2
e U 92 U 91 e U 92 U 91
RR rates vs. the electron relative energy ΔE, experiments: TSR, CRYRING, ESR. Red solid line — theoretical models of H.A. Kramers [Phil. Mag. V. 46. 1923. P. 836.], black solid line — R. Schuch [Phys. Rev. А. V. 45. N. 11. 1992. P. 7894-7905.].
Black dashed line is the fit of the formula above.
Fitted
Fitted1 1
1
1
8
3 8
,
,Ry
.
Z Z Z Z
Z Z
E f E
E bf E a
E
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 6/22
1 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATES FOR BARE NUCLEI(Contnd)
RR rates vs. magnetic field strength B, experiment: ESR. [M. Steck, et al. EPJ D. 15. 2001. P. 145-154.]
1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 00 .1
0 .5
1 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
5 0 .0
E , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
08
cm3 s
80 m T84 m T94 m T104.2 m Ta 1.0a 0.7a 0.4a 0.2
RR spectra of U92+ measured at 4 different magnetic guiding field strengths.
Fitted
Fitted1 1
1
1
8
3 8
,
,Ry
.
Z Z Z Z
Z Z
E f E
E bf E a
E
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 7
1 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATES FOR BARE NUCLEI(Contnd)
RR rates vs. transverse electron temperature T experiment: ESR.[M. Steck. NIM A. 2004. V. 532. P. 427-432.]
clearing voltage
2 2 2
12
cathode
cathode
V cmcm s ,
Gs
VV cm ,
cm
g cm seV ,
Erg eV
10 cm, 1.6 10 Erg eV,
,
0.2 eV.
d
e d
dB
B
d
EV
B
UE
l
m VT
k
l k
T T T
T
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 8
1 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATES FOR BARE NUCLEI[M. Bell and J.S. Bell. Particle Accelerators. 1982. V. 12. P. 49-52.][M. Steck. NIM A. 2004. V. 532. P. 427-432.] (Contnd)
RR rates vs. transverse electron temperature T experiment: ESR (Bell & Bell comparison). RR spectra of U92+ measured for a different drift temperature Td, emRed dashed line — Maxwell, blue dashed line — flattened.
1 0 6 1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 10 .0 1
0 .0 2
0 .0 5
0 .1 0
0 .2 0
0 .5 0
1 .0 0
T d , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
02
s1
96 m T98.2 m T100.5 m T102.8 m T105 m TB ell & B ell , M axw ellB ell & B ell , F lattened
2Maxwell,RR 2 3 2
31 0 1 2 2
2Flattened,RR 2 3 2 2
31 0 1 2
832 4ln ,
2 33 3
232 5ln ln 2 .
2 63 3
BZ Z
e
BZ Z
e
k TZ Rya Z Ry
m T T Z Ry
k TZ Rya Z Ry
m T T Z Ry
cathode cathode, 0.2 eVdT T T T
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 9
1 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATES FOR BARE NUCLEI[M. Bell and J.S. Bell. Particle Accelerators. 1982. V. 12. P. 49-52.][M. Steck. NIM A. 2004. V. 532. P. 427-432.] (Contnd)
RR rates vs. transverse electron temperature T experiment: ESR (Bell & Bell comparison). RR spectra of U92+ measured for a different drift temperature Td, emRed dashed line — Maxwell, blue dashed line — flattened.
1 0 6 1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 10 .0 1
0 .0 2
0 .0 5
0 .1 0
0 .2 0
0 .5 0
1 .0 0
T d , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
02
s1
96 m T98.2 m T100.5 m TB ell & B ell , M axw ellB ell & B ell , F lattened
2Maxwell,RR 2 3 2
31 0 1 2 2
2Flattened,RR 2 3 2 2
31 0 1 2
832 4ln ,
2 33 3
232 5ln ln 2 .
2 63 3
BZ Z
e
BZ Z
e
k TZ Rya Z Ry
m T T Z Ry
k TZ Rya Z Ry
m T T Z Ry
cathode cathode, 0.2 eVdT T T T
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 1
1 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATES FOR BARE NUCLEI[M. Bell and J.S. Bell. Particle Accelerators. 1982. V. 12. P. 49-52.][M. Steck. NIM A. 2004. V. 532. P. 427-432.] (Contnd)
RR rates vs. transverse electron temperature T experiment: ESR (Bell & Bell comparison). RR spectra of U92+ measured for a different drift temperature Td, emRed dashed line — Maxwell, blue dashed line — flattened.
1 0 6 1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 10 .0 1
0 .0 2
0 .0 5
0 .1 0
0 .2 0
0 .5 0
1 .0 0
T d , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
02
s1
98.2 m T102.8 m T105 m TB ell & B ell , M axw ellB ell & B ell , F lattened
2Maxwell,RR 2 3 2
31 0 1 2 2
2Flattened,RR 2 3 2 2
31 0 1 2
832 4ln ,
2 33 3
232 5ln ln 2 .
2 63 3
BZ Z
e
BZ Z
e
k TZ Rya Z Ry
m T T Z Ry
k TZ Rya Z Ry
m T T Z Ry
cathode cathode, 0.2 eVdT T T T
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 11/22
2 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATESFOR INTERMEDIATE CHARGE STATE OF IONS
1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 00 .1
0 .5
1 .0
5 .0
1 0 .0
5 0 .0
E , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
08
cm3 s
e U 28 U 27 e U 92 U 91
RR spectra of U28+ measured at ESR. [A. Müller et al. Phys. Scr. 1991. V. T37. P. 62-65.]
Black line is the fit of the formula above.
Fitted
Fitted1 1
1
1
8
3 8
,
,Ry
.
Z Z Z Z
Z Z
E f E
E bf E a
E
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 12/22
2 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATESFOR INTERMEDIATE CHARGE STATE OF IONS (Contnd)
RR rates vs. electron shell structure, experiments: ESR, LEAR, SIS18
1 5 2 0 2 5 3 01 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
E le c t ro n n u m b e r in io n , N e
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
08
cm3 s A u, ES R
P b, ES RP b, LEA RB i, S IS 18U , ES R
Complete shellPb54+[Ar]4s23d8
One electron missingPb53+[Ar]4s13d10
Complete shellPb52+[Ar]4s23d10
Complete shellAu63+[Ne]3s23p4
U76+[Ne]3s23p4
Bi67+[Ne]3s23p4
Pb66+[Ne]3s23p4
One electron missingPb65+[Ne]3s23p5
Bi66+[Ne]3s23p5
Au62+[Ne]3s23p5
U75+[Ne]3s23p5
One electron missingBi64+[Ar]4s1
Au60+[Ar]4s1
Pb63+[Ar]4s1
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 13/22
2 ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF RR RATESFOR INTERMEDIATE CHARGE STATE OF IONS (Contnd)
RR rates vs. electron shell structure, experiments: LEAR (Pb52+, 53+, 54+), ESR (Au25+), TSR (Au49+, 50+, 51+). Au49+ and Pb52+ — [Ar]4s23d10,Au50+ and Pb53+ — [Ar]4s13d10, Au51+ and Pb54+ — [Ar]4s23d8.
1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 00 .0 1
0 .1
1
1 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
E , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
te,1
08
cm3 s e A u 25 A u24
e A u 49 A u48 e A u 50 A u49 e A u 51 A u50
e P b52 P b51 Z Au2 Z Pb
2
e P b53 P b52 Z Au2 Z Pb
2
e P b54 P b53 Z Au2 Z Pb
2
e A u 50 A u 51 e A u 79 A u 78
Black solid and dashed lines are the fit of the formula above.
Fitted
Fitted1 1
1
1
8
3 8
,
,Ry
.
Z Z Z Z
Z Z
E f E
E bf E a
E
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 14
3 RR BEAM LIFETIME AND COOLING TIME
RR beam lifetime in lab frame:
We use well known Parkhomchuk formula for cooling time in lab frame:
All the units in CGS; q, Z — ion charge and nuclear number; mu, me— unit of mass, electron mass; γ, β — Lorenz factor, beta; max, min — impact parameter; L — electron Larmor radius; V, V|| — , || ion velocity; Veff — electron effective velocity; B — magnetic field angular spread; B — magnetic field in Gs; ΔE — electron energy shift in eV; , — beta-function, emittance; lcool, cool — length, relative length of cooling section; kB=1.6·10−12 Erg/eV — Boltzmann constant; e — electron charge; c — speed of light.
1 RRRR RR Fitted1 cool
1 1 12
1 1, , .Z Z eZ Z
Z Z Z Z Z ZZ Z
ndn dn
n dt n dt
1 2cool 2coolcool cool
3 22 2 2 2eff
22 2max min cool
max min2min 0
30 e
4, , ln ,
1, , , ,
, , 10 ,
Z e e Z eeZ e Z e Z e Z e
u e
L e BZ e L
BL e e
e
n m e Z
Am m V V V
l m ce k TV V
k EV m qB mVm
V c V c V c V
2
ff 0 .BB
e
k EV
m
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 15/22
3 RR BEAM LIFETIME AND COOLING TIME (Contnd)
Estimation of gold ions beam losses in Booster.
1 0 5 1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 00 .0 1
0 .1
1
1 0
1 0 0
E , e V
Rec
ombi
natio
nra
telo
sses
,
A u 25 , A u 32 , A u50
A u 15 , A u 51 , A u79
Black solid and dashed lines are the fit of the formula above.
Fitted
Fitted1 1
1
1
8
3 8
,
,Ry
.
Z Z Z Z
Z Z
E f E
E bf E a
E
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 16/22
3 RR BEAM LIFETIME AND COOLING TIME (Contnd)
Estimation of bare gold nucleus beam lifetime at NICA: Ie=1 A, re=1 cm, T/T||=0.2/5·10−3 eV, B=0.1 T. Intrabeam scattering (IBS) time (τIBS) — black dashed line. The optimal electron energy shift in between of two black dashed lines (0.05 and 2 eV).
1 0 4 0 .0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 0 1 0 01
1 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 4
E , e V
Bea
mlif
etim
e,s
RR cool 1 G eVuRR cool 3.5 G eVuRR cool 4.5 G eVu τIBS(1 GeV/u)=1300 s
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 17/22
3 RR BEAM LIFETIME AND COOLING TIME (Contnd)
Estimation of bare gold nucleus beam lifetime at NICA vs. transverse temperature: Ie=1 A, re=1 cm, B=0.1 T. Based on ESR experiment noted above.
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 18
CONCLUSION
The RR process of gold bare nuclei in NICA cooling system can be suppressed by two methods:
– by choosing of optimal relative electron energy shift ΔE between ions and electrons beam,
– and by an artificial increase the transverse temperature T of the electron beam.
In order to suppress the RR process of intermediate gold ions charge state in the Booster cooling system during ions accumulation is required to avoided when using the ions with electron shell configuration which have one electron missing.
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 19/22
REFERENCES
[1] Concept of NICA Collider. JINR. 2010.[2] H.A. Kramers. Phil. Mag. V. 46. 1923. P. 836.[3] М. Pajek and R. Schuch. Phys. Rev. А. V. 45. N. 11. 1992. P. 7894-7905.[4] M. Bell and J.S. Bell. Particle Accelerators. 1982. V. 12. P. 49-52. (and
references therein for table).[5] W. Shi et al. Euro. Phys. J. D. 15. 2001. P. 145-154.[6] A. Hoffknecht et al. Phys. Rev. А. 2000. V. 63. 012702.[7] O. Uwira et al. Hyperfine Interaction. 1997. V. 108. P. 167-175.[8] A. Hoffknecht et al. Phys. Scr. 2001. V. T92. P. 402-405.[9] W. Spies et al. Hyperfine Interactions. 1998. V. 114. P. 237-243.[10] R. Schuch et al. Acta Physica Polonica B. 1996. V. 27. N. 1-2. P.
307-322.[11] L. Andersen et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990. V. 64. P. 729-732.[12] G.I. Budker et al. Proceedings of the V All-Union Meeting on
Accelerators of Charged Particles 6. P. 236-240.[13] A. Müller et al. Phys. Scr. 1991. V. T37. P. 62-65.[14] A. Wolf et al. NIMA. 2000. V. 441. P. 183-190. / A. Hoffknecht et
al. HYINT. 1998. V. 114. P. 257-261.[15] S. Baird et al. Phys. Lett. B. V. 361. Iss. 1-4. 1995. P. 184-186.
A.V. Philippov, Workshop on Beam Cooling and Related Topics (COOL’11), September 12–16, 2011, Alushta, Ukraine 20/19
Thank you for your attention!