quanta 3d feg beam deceleration · pdf filequanta 3d feg with beam deceleration and in-column...

28
Confidential Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration mode Module 14

Upload: vuongxuyen

Post on 28-Mar-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

Confidential

Quanta 3D FEG

Beam Deceleration mode

Module 14

Page 2: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

2

•New applications

•BSE at low kV (<2 kV)

•Imaging with low landing energy (down to 50 eV)

•High angle BSE

• Improved specification

•Better low kV resolution

•Improved robustness

Optional Beam Deceleration (BD-)mode

Page 3: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

3

Beam Deceleration mode

Using BD mode a focusing lens is

created between negatively

biased specimen and polepiece

or detector above.

• Primary electrons are

decelerated EL = EP - EB

• Basic parameter of the BD

mode:

immersion ratio k = EP / EL

• Rough approximation:

chromatic and spherical

aberration coefficients of

final lens reduced by factor k

• Less chromatic aberrations at

low kV

CCdecel

CC dkV

dV

k

C

V

dVCd

/

Page 4: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

4

Beam Deceleration - mode

Primary electrons are

decelerated:

EL = EP - EB

SE and BSE are accelerated

and detected as high energy

electrons

ESE ~ EB

EBSE ~ EP

Basic parameter of the

cathode lens: immersion ratio

k = EP / EL

E = Landing energy

Page 5: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

5 5

BD-Specifications

• Optional

• Detector needed above sample (BSED)

• Only possible in High Vacuum mode

• Landing energy: 50 eV – 30 keV

• Maximum stage bias: – 4 kV

• Touch alarm disabled and probe current

measurement disabled

• Additional UI control page

Page 6: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

6

Beam Deceleration control

Page 7: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

8

Detector – overview for BD mode

Quanta 3D FEG

Detectors for BD

mode + -BSED (4-quad) No limiting field of view, good

efficiency

Optional, Slow, large hole

diameter

Retractable vCD Faster, low kV sensitive, small hole

diameter

Optional, Limiting field of view

In Column Detector

(ICD)

Best efficiency for SE, combinable

with others, not limiting field of

view

Slow

Page 8: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

9

In-column - ICD detector

SE imaging in combination with

Beam Deceleration mode

Primary beam energy: 4keV

3keV

Landing energy: 1keV

Energy on detector: 3keV (SE) and 4keV (BS)

Page 9: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

10

Detection in BD mode

BSE collection efficiency, Stage bias 4000, landing energy 1000V

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32

WD/mm

Co

llecte

d B

SE

's/%

of

tota

l em

issio

n

QFEG (18mm diode)

Q3DFEG (10mm diode)

Autrata detector

Optimal Q3DFEG WD=5-6mm

Page 10: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

12

• Recommendations for BD mode:

• Sample would be best flat if possible because of parallel plane to detector.

• Sample should be semi-conductive or conductive.

• Sample has compositional contrast either: atomic contrast, crystalline orientation phase contrast or chemical compositional phase contrast, or combined.

• Sample has fine physical structure that usually is lost due to edge brightness or transparency in SE mode.

• Sample that is problematic in high vacuum or low voltage mode should be tried in cathode mode.

• The Electron column should be a performer to cope with high resolution with a BSD and low voltage.

Page 11: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

13

Detection in BD mode

Calculations by Marek UncovskyClose to PB (high angle) z-contrast

Small angles: topo

Page 12: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

14

Low kV BSE

•Enabled detection of BSE at low kV

SE @ 1 kV BSE @ 1 kV

Page 13: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

15

Low landing energy

•Imaging with electrons below 200 eV

50 eV 100 eV

Page 14: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

16

Low landing energy

•Imaging with electrons below 200 eV

200 eV 100 eV

Page 15: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

17

High angle BSED

• Improved detection of high angle BSE

K = 1 K = 1.6

Page 16: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

18

•Plusses

Lower aberration

coefficients

Better low kV resolution

Easy landing energy

control

System robustness

Aperture quality

Alignments

Coulomb interactions

•Minus

Specimen part of the lens

Effected by Flatness,

Roughness,Tilt

Detector above sample

(BSED) is needed,

ETD does not work (very low signal)

Only can be used in high

vacuum mode

Beam Deceleration - mode

Page 17: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

21

Detection in BD mode

•Signal electrons are accelerated and deflected in field of cathode lens

Secondary electrons are detected with energy approximately corresponding to beam deceleration voltage

Backscattered electrons are detected with approximately primary beam energy

All signal electrons trajectories are bent to axis – SE and low angle BSE usually disappear in final lens

Page 18: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

22

Improved Resolution with Conventional Final Lens

3 nm @ 1 kV 2 nm @ 4kV - 3kV = 1 kV

2 nm (35-65%)

Quanta FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector

Page 19: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

23

ICD + solid state BSED

LE 1kV stage bias 4000V

1.55 nm (35-65%) 2.45 nm (35-65%)

LE 1kV stage bias 4000V

Page 20: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

24

Improved Resolution with Conventional Final Lens

2.5 nm @ 200 V 3 nm @ 100 V

2.94 nm (35-65%)

Quanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector

2.4 nm (35-65%)

Page 21: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

25

BD mode – Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

• ICD –– almost pure SE signal - local charging visible (signal similar like on TLD-SE det e.g. Helios)

• SSBSED – BE – optimal for imaging in this case, no charging

• ETD – mixture of various BSEs – less local charging, little signal

Sample - 0 deg – cross section, HT 5kV, landing energy 2kV (stage bias 3kV)

Customer sample - CONFIDENTIAL!

Page 22: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

26

BD mode – Quanta 3D FEG – detector comparison

• ICD –– almost pure SE signal

• SSBSED – BE – optimal for imaging in this case,

• ETD – mixture of various BSEs –, little signal

Sample – steel surface , HT 5kV, landing energy 1kV (stage bias 4kV)

Customer sample - CONFIDENTIAL!

Page 23: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

27

BD on FIB cut

Quanta FEG + BD mode + Autrata detector

Standard FIB cut tilted 40deg

Page 24: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

28

BD on FIB cutThe same area but with beam deceleration (stage voltage 3.5kV)Conventional mode observation of a cross section

at low kV

Field inhomogeneity is too high - not possible to focus

It is not possible to efficiently use standard

geometry (i.e. tilted sample) for FIB cut

observation -

Page 25: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

29

•Used approach:

• FIB cut prepared at 0deg

• BD used on an inclined surface

BD on FIB cut

FIB

cut direction

SEM in BD mode

Observed surface

Page 26: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

30

BD mode – Quanta 3D FEG –BD on 0 deg FIB cut

• ICD –– almost pure SE signal - local charging visible (signal similar like on TLD-SE det e.g. Helios)

• SSBSED – BE – optimal for imaging in this case, no charging

• ETD – mixture of various BSEs – less local charging, little signal

Sample - 0 deg – cross section, HT 5kV, landing energy 2kV (stage bias 3kV)

Customer sample - CONFIDENTIAL!

Page 27: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

31

Borelia Block - BD on 0 deg FIB cut

Page 28: Quanta 3D FEG Beam Deceleration · PDF fileQuanta 3D FEG with beam deceleration and in-column solid state detector 2.4 nm (35-65%) 25 BD mode –Quanta 3D FEG –detector comparison

32

Borelia BlockWhy BD? – for mat with low Z - we may need small interaction volume + BEs