quality management what and why? tools for continuous improvement statistical process control...
TRANSCRIPT
Quality Management What and Why? Tools for Continuous Improvement Statistical Process Control Process Capability 6 Sigma Quality Taguchi’s View
What is Quality?
Performance - primary operating characteristics
Features - little extras Reliability - no failure in a given time span Conformance - meeting standards Durability - length of usefulness Serviceability - speed, ease of repair Aesthetics - pleasing to the senses Perceived quality - reputation
8 Dimensions of Quality
How is Quality Defined in Service?
What is Total Quality Management?
Top management involvement Customer driven quality standards Quality at the source Supplier-customer links
everyone has a customer Prevention orientation Continuous improvement
TQM: Philosophical Elements
What are the Costs Associated with Managing Quality?
Kaizen: Continuous Improvement
Standard-Maintaining System Performance standards are fixed unless
major breakthrough in technology occurs Continuous-Improvement System
Performance level should be continuously challenged and incrementally upgraded
Typically requires multifunctional work teams participative management decentralized decision making
The PDSA Cycle (Deming Wheel)
A P
DS
Plan a change ora test, aimed at improvement
Do - Carry out thechange or the test
Study theresults. What didwe learn? What went wrong?
Act -Adopt the change,or abandon it, or run through the cycle again
Source: The New Economics, Deming
Tools for Continuous Improvement Used extensively to improve quality Deceptively simple - workers at all
levels can use Yet, very powerful
Flowcharts, Check sheets, Pareto diagrams, Histograms, Cause-and-effect diagrams, Scatter Diagrams, Run Charts Control charts
Flow Chart A picture of a process that shows
the sequence of steps for a process Makes the process explicit Facilitates group understanding Identifies unknown or
misunderstood steps Can quickly illustrate problems and
solutions
Physician’s Office
Admitting FinancialPlanning
InpatientAccounting
Medicare
Medical Records
Unit
EmergencyDept
UtilizationManagement
Clinical Admin
Medicare Inpatient Billing Process at MassachusettsGeneral Hospital – High Level Flow Diagram(Source: Berwick, Godfrey, Roessner, 1990)
Selected Flow Diagram Symbols Operation/activity
Decision
Storage
Information flow
Flow
Check Sheets
Billing Errors
Wrong Account
Wrong Amount
A/R Errors
Wrong Account
Wrong Amount
Monday
Histograms Graphical representation of the variation in a set of data Provide clues about the characteristics of the population
e.g. bimodal pattern suggests two individual processes
Pareto Diagram To separate "vital few" from the "trivial many" 80/20 rule Histogram of data from the largest frequency to the smallest
Pareto Chart-Occurrences of Errors in Providing a Product to a Customer
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Delivery Raw Fabrication Final Subassembly materials assembly
Cause-and-Effect Diagram Helps in understanding the possible causes of
the problem Problem is listed at one end of a horizontal line Branches are drawn to represent possible cause
PeopleMachine
Effect
MaterialMethod
Environment
Fishbone Chart-Delivery of Goods by Truck
Shipping Documents
Trucking
Leave atright time
Driver knowsroute
Latest traffic& road conditions
Truckmaintenance Delivery of
goods bytruck
Packinglist
Invoice
Rightinformation
Label stuckon well
Containerlabeling
Labellocation
Protectivepacking
Rightcontainer
Quantityin containerPacking
Scatter Diagram
Shows correlation between variables Variables can be from the cause-and-effect diagram
Hours of Training
02468
1012
0 10 20 30
Hours of Training
Def
ects
Control Charts Why bother?
Understanding Variability: An Experiment
Write small letter ‘a’ ten times with your “good” hand.
Now write it ten times with your other hand.
Understanding Variability
Process
Common Causes Special
Causes
Variation
Common Vs. Special Causes Common Causes: Random,
unidentifiable sources of variation
Special Causes: Variation causing factors that can be identified and eliminated
Statistical Process Control:
Conceptual Framework
Every process has variation Must differential between acceptable
and unacceptable variations Acceptable - - random or COMMON Unacceptable - non-random or SPECIAL
- assignable cause exists
A process is in control when all SPECIAL causes are removed.
The NormalThe NormalDistributionDistribution
-3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3Mean
68.26%95.44%99.74%
= Standard deviation
Figure 7.5
Control ChartsControl Charts
UCL
Nominal
LCL
Assignable causes likely
1 2 3SamplesFigure 7.6
Using Control Charts for Using Control Charts for Process ImprovementProcess Improvement
Measure the process When problems are indicated, find
the assignable cause Eliminate problems, incorporate
improvements Repeat the cycle
Measure variables - continuous scale x-chart; R Chart
Measure attributes -for yes/no decisions proportion defective -- p-chart number of defects per unit -- c-chart
number of paint defects/sq yard
Types of Control Charts
p-chart, for the population proportion defective take a random sample, inspect plot the sample proportion defective compare with UCL and LCL to see
whether the process is in control
Control charts for attributes
Control ChartsControl Chartsfor Variablesfor Variables
West Allis IndustriesWest Allis Industries
Example 7.1
Control ChartsControl Chartsfor Variablesfor Variables
Sample Sample
Number 1 2 3 4 R x
1 0.5014 0.5022 0.5009 0.5027 0.0018 0.5018
2 0.5021 0.5041 0.5024 0.5020 0.0021 0.5027
3 0.5018 0.5026 0.5035 0.5023 0.0017 0.5026
4 0.5008 0.5034 0.5024 0.5015 0.0026 0.5020
5 0.5041 0.5056 0.5034 0.5047 0.0022 0.5045
R = 0.0021
x = 0.5027
Special Metal Screw
Example 7.1
=
_
Example 7.1
Control ChartsControl Chartsfor Variablesfor Variables
Control Charts – Special Metal Screw
R-Charts R = 0.0021
UCLR = D4RLCLR = D3R
Example 7.1
Control ChartsControl Chartsfor Variablesfor Variables
Control Charts - Special Metal Screw
R - Charts R = 0.0020 D4 = 2.2080
Control Chart FactorsControl Chart Factors
Factor for UCLFactor for UCL Factor forFactor for FactorFactorSize ofSize of and LCL forand LCL for LCL forLCL for UCL forUCL forSampleSample xx-Charts-Charts RR-Charts-Charts RR-Charts-Charts
((nn)) ((AA22)) ((DD33)) ((DD44))
22 1.8801.880 0 0 3.2673.26733 1.0231.023 0 0 2.5752.57544 0.7290.729 0 0 2.2822.28255 0.5770.577 0 0 2.1152.11566 0.4830.483 0 0 2.0042.00477 0.4190.419 0.076 0.076 1.9241.924
Example 7.1
Control ChartsControl Chartsfor Variablesfor Variables
Control Charts—Special Metal Screw
R-Charts R = 0.0021 D4 = 2.282D3 = 0
UCLR = 2.282 (0.0021) = 0.00479 in.LCLR = 0 (0.0021) = 0 in.
UCLR = D4RLCLR = D3R
Range Chart - Range Chart - Special Metal Special Metal ScrewScrew
Figure 7.9
Example 7.1
Control ChartsControl Chartsfor Variablesfor Variables
Control Charts—Special Metal Screw
X-Charts
UCLx = x + A2RLCLx = x - A2R
==
R = 0.0021x = 0.5027=
Example 7.1
Control ChartsControl Chartsfor Variablesfor Variables
Control Charts - Special Metal Screw
R = 0.0020x = 0.5025
x - Charts
UCLx = x + A2RLCLx = x - A2R
Control Chart FactorsControl Chart Factors
Factor for UCLFactor for UCL Factor forFactor for FactorFactorSize ofSize of and LCL forand LCL for LCL forLCL for UCL forUCL forSampleSample xx-Charts-Charts RR-Charts-Charts RR-Charts-Charts
((nn)) ((AA22)) ((DD33)) ((DD44))
22 1.8801.880 00 3.2673.26733 1.0231.023 00 2.5752.57544 0.7290.729 00 2.2822.28255 0.5770.577 00 2.1152.11566 0.4830.483 00 2.0042.00477 0.4190.419 0.0760.076 1.9241.924
Example 7.1
Control ChartsControl Chartsfor Variablesfor Variables
Control Charts—Special Metal Screw
x-Charts
UCLx = 0.5027 + 0.729 (0.0021) = 0.5042 in.LCLx = 0.5027 – 0.729 (0.0021) = 0.5012 in.
UCLx = x + A2RLCLx = x - A2R
==
R = 0.0021 A2 = 0.729x = 0.5027=
xx-Chart—-Chart—Special Metal Special Metal ScrewScrew
Figure 7.10
xx-Chart— -Chart— Special Metal Special Metal ScrewScrew
Figure 7.10
xx-Chart—-Chart—Special Metal Special Metal ScrewScrew
Figure 7.10
Measure the process Find the assignable cause Eliminate the problem Repeat the cycle
Control ChartsControl Charts
for Variables Using for Variables Using
Example 7.2
UCLUCLxx = = xx + + zzxx
LCLLCLxx = = xx – – zzxx
x = /n
==
==
Control ChartsControl Charts
for Variables Using for Variables Using
Example 7.2
UCLUCLxx = = xx + + zzxx
LCLLCLxx = = xx – – zzxx
x = /n
==
==
Sunny Dale Bank
x = 5.0 minutes = 1.5 minutesn = 6 customersz = 1.96
=
Control ChartsControl Charts
for Variables Using for Variables Using
UCLx = 5.0 + 1.96(1.5)/ 6 = 6.20 min
UCLx = 5.0 – 1.96(1.5)/ 6 = 3.80 min
UCLUCLxx = = xx + + zzxx
LCLLCLxx = = xx – – zzxx
x = /n
==
==
Sunny Dale Bank
x = 5.0 minutes = 1.5 minutesn = 6 customersz = 1.96
=
p-chart, for the population proportion defective take a random sample, inspect plot the sample proportion defective compare with UCL and LCL to see
whether the process is in control
Control charts for attributes
n
)p-(1 p = p
UCL = p + Z
LCL = p - Z
p
p
Attribute Measurements (P-Charts)
p = Total # of Defectives/Total Sample
Sample n Defects1 100 42 50 23 100 54 100 35 75 66 100 47 100 38 50 89 100 1
10 100 211 100 312 100 213 100 214 100 815 100 3
Example
1. Calculate the sample proportion, p, for each sample.Sample n Defects p
1 100 4 0.042 50 2 0.043 100 5 0.054 100 3 0.035 75 6 0.086 100 4 0.047 100 3 0.038 50 8 0.169 100 1 0.01
10 100 2 0.0211 100 3 0.0312 100 2 0.0213 100 2 0.0214 100 8 0.0815 100 3 0.03
2. Calculate the average of the sample proportions.
3. Calculate the standard deviation of the sample proportion ....
.02065= 91.6667
.04073)-04073(1=
n
)p-(1 p = p
0.04073=1375
56 = p
4. Calculate the control limits.
p + / - Z p
UCL = 0.10268LCL = -0.02122 (or 0)
0.04073 +/- 3(0.02065)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0 5 10 15
Observation
p
5. Plot the individual sample proportions, the average of the proportions, and the control limits ....
UCL
LCL
A single point outside limits Two consecutive points near a limit A five point trend toward a limit A run of five points above or below
the average
Erratic behavior
When To Take Action
Process Capability Used to assess the degree to which
the output of a process conforms to specifications
Natural spread of a process is defined as 6 sigma
Specification limits or tolerance limits (LSL, USL) or (LTL, UTL)
Natural Spread vs. Tolerance Spread
Natural Spread
Tolerance Spread
(a) (b)
(c)
Cp= Tolerance Spread/Natural Spread= (USL-LSL)/6sigma
• A cookie machine produces cookies with mean sugar content of 4.28; std of 0.122
• Tolerance Limits for the Product [3.98,4.98]
• Process Capability Ratio =
Process Capability Ratio
Process Capability Index, Cpk
Shifts in Process Mean ....
Cpk
= minX LSL
3 or
USL-X
3
3.914 4.6464.28
3.98 4.98
Example Mean of the Process = 4.28; STD = 0.122 Tolerance Limits for the Product
[3.98,4.98] Process Capability Ratio
=(4.98-3.98)/6*0.122 = 1.366 Process Capability Index =
= min{0.81, 1.91}=0.81
}122.0*3
28.498.4,
122.0*3
98.328.4min{
Why Six Sigma?
If natural spread = tolerance spread we will have:
> 20,000 wrong prescriptions/yr. > 15,000 babies accidentally dropped
each year by nurses and obstetricians 500 incorrect surgical operations
each week
Six Sigma Quality
X-Sigma Quality
Cp W/O shift in mean (ppm)
With shift in mean (ppm)
3 1 2,700 66,803
4 1.33 63 6,200
5 1.67 0.57 233
6 2 0.002 3.4
When Cp=2, it is called six-sigma qualityppm: parts per million
Building Process Capability
Division ManagementMobilize the Entire Organization
Marketing, Design,and EngineeringImprove Performance byIncreasing the Numerator
Manufacturing, Delivery,and ServiceImprove Performance by Decreasing the Denominator
Cpk
SOURCE: Smith (1990).
Is it enough to be "in spec" ? Robustness comes from consistency
Consistent deviation vs scattered deviation
More deviation from the target means greater quality losses Quality Loss Function: losses proportional
to the square of deviation
Robust Quality
Taguchi’s View of Variation
Traditional View Taguchi’s View
LowerTolerance
DesignSpec
UpperTolerance
Non
-con
form
ance
to
desi
gn c
ost
$$$
0
LowerTolerance
DesignSpec
UpperTolerance
Actual value->
Controlling Variation
Fear? Control?
Loss of Options?Can Variations be Controlled in Health Care?
Handcuffs?
Tool for Medical Field Care path: standardized guidelines for a
particular diagnosis or procedure High volume and resource use Caregivers now have a recipe to follow Interdisciplinary
merging the medical and nursing plans of care with those of other disciplines, such as physical therapy, nutrition, or mental health.
Benchmarks permit effectiveness assessment
Examples Massachusetts General Hospital
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)
The University of Texas Medical Center Colon cancer
Shouldice Hospital Hernia surgery