quality improvement
DESCRIPTION
Quality Improvement. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e. Chapter 6- Control Charts for Variables. The Control Chart Techniques State of Introduction Control Specifications Process Capability Different Control Charts. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Quality Quality ImprovementImprovement
Quality Quality ImprovementImprovement
PowerPoint presentation to accompanyPowerPoint presentation to accompany
Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9eBesterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e
PowerPoint presentation to accompanyPowerPoint presentation to accompany
Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9eBesterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e
Chapter 6- Control Chapter 6- Control Charts for VariablesCharts for VariablesChapter 6- Control Chapter 6- Control
Charts for VariablesCharts for Variables
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
2
OutlineOutline
The Control Chart Techniques State of Introduction Control Specifications Process Capability Different Control Charts
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
3
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
When you have completed this chapter you should:
Know the three categories of variation and their sources.
Understand the concept of the control chart method.
Know the purpose of variable control charts. Know how to select the quality characteristics,
the rational subgroup and the method of taking samples
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
4
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
When you have completed this chapter you should:
Be able to calculate the central value, trial control limits and the revised control limits for Xbar and
R chart. Be able to explain what is meant by a process in
control and the various out-of-control patterns. Know the difference between individual
measurements and averages; control limits and specifications.
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
5
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
When you have completed this chapter you should:
Know the different situations between the process spread and specifications and what can be done to correct the undesirable situation.
Be able to calculate process capability.
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
6
The variation concept is a law of nature in that no two natural items are the same.
The variation may be quite large and easily noticeable
The variation may be very small. It may appear that items are identical; however, precision instruments will show difference
The ability to measure variation is necessary before it can be controlled
variationvariation
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
7
There are three categories of variation in piece part production:
1. Within-piece variation: Surface
2. Piece-to-piece variation: Among pieces produced at the same time
3. Time-to-time variation: Difference in product produced at different times of the day
VariationVariation
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
8
Materials
ToolsTools
OperatorsOperators MethodsMethods MeasurementMeasurement InstrumentsInstruments
HumanHumanInspectionInspectionPerformancePerformance
EnvironmentEnvironmentMachinesMachines
INPUTSINPUTS PROCESSPROCESS OUTPUTSOUTPUTS
VariationVariation
Sources of Variation in production processes:
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
9
Sources of variation are:1. Equipment:
1. Toolwear2. Machine vibration3. Electrical fluctuations etc.
2. Material1. Tensile strength2. Ductility3. Thickness4. Porosity etc.
VariationVariation
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
10
Sources of variation are:3. Environment
1. Temperature2. Light3. Radiation4. Humidity etc.
4. Operator1. Personal problem2. Physical problem etc.
VariationVariation
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
12
Variable datax-bar and R-chartsx-bar and s-chartsCharts for individuals (x-charts)
Attribute dataFor “defectives” (p-chart, np-chart)For “defects” (c-chart, u-chart)
Control ChartsControl Charts
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
13
ControlCharts
RChart
VariablesCharts
AttributesCharts
XChart
PChart
CChart
Continuous Numerical Data
Categorical or Discrete Numerical Data
Control ChartsControl Charts
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
14
The control chart for variables is a means of visualizing the variations that occur in the central tendency and the mean of a set of observations. It shows whether or not a process is in a stable state.
Control Charts for VariablesControl Charts for Variables
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
15
Control ChartsControl Charts
Figure 5-1 Example of a control chart
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
16
Control ChartsControl Charts
Figure 6-1 Example of a method of reporting inspection results
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
17
The objectives of the variable control charts are:
1. For quality improvement
2. To determine the process capability
3. For decisions regarding product specifications
4. For current decisions on the production process
5. For current decisions on recently produced items
Variable Control ChartsVariable Control Charts
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
18
Procedure for establishing a pair of control charts for the average Xbar and the range R:
1. Select the quality characteristic
2. Choose the rational subgroup
3. Collect the data
4. Determine the trial center line and control limits
5. Establish the revised central line and control limits
6. Achieve the objective
Control Chart TechniquesControl Chart Techniques
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
19
The Quality characteristic must be measurable. It can expressed in terms of the seven basic units:
1.Length2.Mass3.Time4.Electrical current5.Temperature6.Subatance7.Luminosity
Quality CharacteristicQuality Characteristic
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
20
A rational subgroup is one in which the variation within a group is due only to chance causes.
Within-subgroup variation is used to determine the control limits.
Variation between subgroups is used to evaluate long-term stability.
Rational SubgroupRational Subgroup
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
21
There are two schemes for selecting the subgroup samples:
1. Select subgroup samples from product or service produced at one instant of time or as close to that instant as possible
2. Select from product or service produced over a period of time that is representative of all the products or services
Rational SubgroupRational Subgroup
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
22
The first scheme will have a minimum variation within a subgroup.The second scheme will have a minimum variation among subgroups.The first scheme is the most commonly used since it provides a particular time reference for determining assignable causes.The second scheme provides better overall results and will provide a more accurate picture of the quality.
Rational SubgroupRational Subgroup
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
23
As the subgroup size increases, the control limits become closer to the central value, which make the control chart more sensitive to small variations in the process average
As the subgroup size increases, the inspection cost per subgroup increases
When destructive testing is used and the item is expensive, a small subgroup size is required
Subgroup SizeSubgroup Size
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
24
From a statistical basis a distribution of subgroup averages are nearly normal for groups of 4 or more even when samples are taken from a non-normal distribution
When a subgroup size of 10 or more is used, the s chart should be used instead of the R chart. .
See Table 6-1 for (total) sample sizes
Subgroup SizeSubgroup Size
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
25
Data collection can be accomplished using the type of figure shown in Figure 6-2.
It can also be collected using the method in Table 6-2.
It is necessary to collect a minimum of 25 subgroups of data.
A run chart can be used to analyze the data in the development stage of a product or prior to a state of statistical control
Data CollectionData Collection
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
26
Run ChartRun Chart
Figure 6-4 Run Chart for data of Table 6-2
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
27
Trial Central LinesTrial Central Lines
Central Lines are obtained using:
1 1
g g
i ii i
i
i
X RX and R
g g
where
X average of subgroup averages
X average of the ith subgroup
g number of subgroups
R average of subgroup ranges
R range of the ith subgroup
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
28
Trial Control LimitsTrial Control Limits
Trial control limits are established at ±3 standard deviatons from the central value
3 3
3 3
R RX X
R RX X
X
R
UCL X UCL R
LCL X LCL R
where
UCL=upper control limit
LCL=lower control limit
population standard deviation of the subgroup averages
population standard deviation of the range
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
29
Trial Control LimitsTrial Control Limits
In practice calculations are simplified by using the following equations where A2,D3
and D4 are factors that vary with the
subgroupsize and are found in Table B of the Appendix.
2 4
2 3
RX
RX
UCL X A R UCL D R
LCL X A R LCL D R
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
30
Trial Control LimitsTrial Control Limits
Figure 6-5 Xbar and R chart for preliminary data with trial control limits
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
31
Revised Central LinesRevised Central Lines
d dnew new
d d
d
d
d
X X R RX and R
g g g g
where
X discarded subgroup averages
g number of discarded subgroups
R discarded subgroup ranges
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
32
Standard ValuesStandard Values
00 0 0
2
new newR
X X R R andd
0 0 2 0
0 0 1 0
RX
RX
UCL X A UCL D
LCL X A LCL D
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
33Figure 6-6 Trial control limits and revised control limits for Xbar and R charts
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
34
Achieve the ObjectiveAchieve the Objective
Figure 5-7 Continuing use of control charts, showing improved quality
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
35
Revised Central LinesRevised Central Lines
d dnew new
d d
d
d
d
X X R RX and R
g g g g
where
X discarded subgroup averages
g number of discarded subgroups
R discarded subgroup ranges
36
Sample Standard Deviation Sample Standard Deviation Control ChartControl Chart
For subgroup sizes >=10, an s chart is more accurate than an R Chart.Trial control limits are given by:
1 1
3 4
3 3
g gi ii i
sX
sX
s Xs X
g g
UCL X A s UCL B s
LCL X A s LCL B s
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
37
Revised Limits for s chartRevised Limits for s chart
0
00 0
4
0 0 6 0
0 0 5 0
4 5 6, , ,
dnew
d
dnew
d
sX
sX
d
X XX X
g g
s s ss s
g g c
UCL X A UCL B
LCL X A LCL B
where
s discarded subgroup averages
c A B B factors found in Table B
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
38
Process in Control When special causes have been
eliminated from the process to the extent that the points plotted on the control chart remain within the control limits, the process is in a state of control
When a process is in control, there occurs a natural pattern of variation
State of ControlState of Control
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
39
State of ControlState of Control
Figure 6-9 Natural pattern of variation of a control chart
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
40
Types of errors: Type I, occurs when looking for a special
cause of variation when in reality a common cause is present
Type II, occurs when assuming that a common cause of variation is present when in reality there is a special cause
State of ControlState of Control
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
41
When the process is in control:
1. Individual units of the product or service will be more uniform
2. Since the product is more uniform, fewer samples are needed to judge the quality
3. The process capability or spread of the process is easily attained from 6ơ
4. Trouble can be anticipated before it occurs
State of ControlState of Control
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
42
When the process is in control:
5. The % of product that falls within any pair of values is more predictable
6. It allows the consumer to use the producer’s data
7. It is an indication that the operator is performing satisfactorily
State of ControlState of Control
Common Common CausesCauses
Special Special CausesCauses
45
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
44
State of ControlState of Control
Figure 6-11 Frequency Distribution of subgroup averages with control limits
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
45
When a point (subgroup value) falls outside its control limits, the process is out of control.
Out of control means a change in the process due to a special or assignable cause.A process can also be considered out of control even when the points fall inside the 3ơ limits
State of ControlState of Control
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
46
It is not natural for seven or more consecutive points to be above or below the central line.
Also when 10 out of 11 points or 12 out of 14 points are located on one side of the central line, it is unnatural.
Six points in a row are steadily increasing or decreasing indicate an out of control situation
State of ControlState of Control
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
47
Patterns in Control ChartsPatterns in Control Charts
Figure 6-12 Some unnatural runs-process out of control
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
State of ControlState of Control
Simplified rule: Divide space into two equal zones of 1.5σ.
Out of control occurs when two consecutive points are beyond 1.5σ.
See Figure 6-13
48
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
49
Patterns in Control ChartsPatterns in Control Charts
Figure 6-13 Simplified rule for out-of-control pattern
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
50
1. Change or jump in level.
2. Trend or steady change in level
3. Recurring cycles
4. Two populations (also called mixture)
5. Mistakes
Out-of-Control ConditionOut-of-Control Condition
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
51
Out-of-Control PatternsOut-of-Control Patterns
Change or jump inlevel Trend or steady change in level
Recurring cycles Two populations
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
52
SpecificationsSpecifications
Figure 5-18 Comparison of individual values compared to averages
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
53
Calculations of the average for both the individual values and for the subgroup avergaes are the same. However the sample standard deviation is different.
SpecificationsSpecifications
X
X
nwhere
population standard deviation of subgroup averages
population standard deviation of individual values
n=subgroup size
If we assume normality, then the population standard deviation
can be
4
sestimated from
c
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
54
If the population from which samples are taken is not normal, the distribution of sample averages will tend toward normality provided that the sample size, n, is at least 4. This tendency gets better and better as the sample size gets larger. The standardized normal can be used for the distribution averages with the modification.
Central Limit TheoremCentral Limit Theorem
X
X XZ
n
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
55
Central Limit TheoremCentral Limit Theorem
Figure 6-19 Illustration of central limit theorem
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
56
Central Limit TheoremCentral Limit Theorem
Figure 6-20 Dice illustration of central limit theorem
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
57
The control limits are established as a function of the average
Specifications are the permissible variation in the size of the part and are, therefore, for individual values
The specifications or tolerance limits are established by design engineers to meet a particular function
Control Limits & Control Limits & SpecificationsSpecifications
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
58
Figure 6-21 Relationship of limits, specifications, and distributions
Control Limits & Control Limits & SpecificationsSpecifications
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
59
The process spread will be referred to as the process capability and is equal to 6σ
The difference between specifications is called the tolerance
When the tolerance is established by the design engineer without regard to the spread of the process, undesirable situations can result
Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
60
Three situations are possible: Case I: When the process capability is
less than the tolerance 6σ<USL-LSL Case II: When the process capability is
equal to the tolerance 6σ=USL-LSL Case III: When the process capability is
greater than the tolerance 6σ >USL-LSL
Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
61
Case I: When the process capability is less than the tolerance 6σ<USL-LSL
Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance
Figure 6-24 Case I 6σ<USL-LSL
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
62
Case II: When the process capability is equal to the tolerance 6σ=USL-LSL
Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance
Figure 6-24 Case I 6σ=USL-LSL
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
63
Case III: When the process capability is less than the tolerance 6σ>USL-LSL
Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance
Figure 6-24 Case I 6σ>USL-LSL
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
64
The range over which the natural variation of a process occurs as determined by the system of common or random causes
Measured by the proportion of output that can be produced within design specifications
Process CapabilityProcess Capability
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
65
This following method of calculating the process capability assumes that the process is stable or in statistical control:
Take 25 (g) subgroups of size 4 for a total of 100 measurements
Calculate the range, R, for each subgroup
Calculate the average range, RBar= ΣR/g
Calculate the estimate of the population standard deviation
Process capability will equal 6σ0
Process CapabilityProcess Capability
0
2
R
d
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
66
The process capability can also be obtained by using the standard deviation:
Take 25 (g) subgroups of size 4 for a total of 100 measurements Calculate the sample standard deviation, s, for each subgroup Calculate the average sample standard deviation, sbar = Σs/g Calculate the estimate of the population
standard deviation Process capability will equal 6σo
Process CapabilityProcess Capability
0
4
s
c
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
67
Process capability and tolerance are combined to form the capability index.
Capability IndexCapability Index
0
0
6
6
p
p
USL LSLC
where C capabilityindex
USL LSL tolerance
process capability
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
68
The capability index does not measure process performance in terms of the nominal or target value. This measure is accomplished by Cpk.
Capability IndexCapability Index
0
{( ) ( )
3
6
pk
p
Min USL X or X LSLC
where C capabilityindex
USL LSL tolerance
process capability
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
69
Cp = USL - LSL 6 ơo
(USL- ¯X), (¯X-LSL)} Cpk = min{
The Capability Index does not measureprocess performance in terms of the nominal or target
Capability IndexCapability Index
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
70
1. The Cp value does not change as the process center changes
2. Cp=Cpk when the process is centered3. Cpk is always equal to or less than Cp4. A Cpk = 1 indicates that the process is
producing product that conforms to specifications
5. A Cpk < 1 indicates that the process is producing product that does not conform to specifications
Capability IndexCapability Index
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
71
6. A Cp < 1 indicates that the process is not capable
7. A Cpk=0 indicates the average is equal to one of the specification limits
8. A negative Cpk value indicates that the average is outside the specifications
Capability IndexCapability Index
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
72
Cpk = negative number
Cpk = zero
Cpk = between 0 and 1
Cpk = 1
Cpk > 1
CCpkpk Measures Measures
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
73
Charts for Better Operator Understanding:
1. Placing individual values on the chart: This technique plots both the individual values and the subgroup average. Not recommended since it does not provide much information.
2. Chart for subgroup sums: This technique plots the subgroup sum, ΣX, rather than the group average, Xbar.
Different Control ChartsDifferent Control Charts
( )
( )
X X
X X
UCL n UCL
UCL n LCL
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
74
FIGURE 6-27 Chart forIndividual Values & Subgroup Averages
FIGURE 6-28 Subgroup Sum Chart
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
75
Charts for Variable Subgroup Size:
Used when the sample size is not the same Different control limits for each subgroup As n increases, limits become narrower As n decreases, limits become wider apart Difficult to interpret and explain To be avoided
Different Control ChartsDifferent Control Charts
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
76
FIGURE 6-29 Chart for Variable Subgroup Size
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
77
Chart for Trends:
Used when the plotted points have an upward or downward trend that can be attributed to an unnatural pattern of variation or a natural pattern such as tool wear.
The central line is on a slope, therefore its equation must be determined.
Different Control ChartsDifferent Control Charts
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
79
Chart for TrendsChart for Trends
Figure 6-32 Chart for Trend
80
Used when we cannot have multiple observations per time period
ValueValue XbarXbar RR
4444
4646
5454 48.0048.00 1010
3838 46.0046.00 1616
4949 47.0047.00 1616
4646 44.3344.33 1111
4545 46.6746.67 44
3131 40.6740.67 1515
5555 43.6743.67 2424
3737 41.0041.00 2424
4242 44.6744.67 1818
4343 40.6740.67 66
4747 44.0044.00 55
5151 47.0047.00 88
XX
n
RR
n
NOTE: n here is equal to 12, NOT 14
Chart for Moving Average Chart for Moving Average and and
Moving RangeMoving Range
An example
81
Extreme readings have a greater effect than in conventional charts. An extreme value is used several times in the calculations, the number of times depends on the averaging period.
Chart for Moving Average Chart for Moving Average and Moving Rangeand Moving Range
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
82
This is a simplified variable control chart. Minimizes calculations Easier to understand Can be easily maintained by operators Recommended to use a subgroup of 3,
then all data is used.
Chart for Median and RangeChart for Median and Range
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
83
5
5
6
5
MD Md Md
MD Md Md
R Md
R Md
UCL Md A R
LCL Md A R
UCL D R
LCL D R
For Table for A5, D5 and D6 see page 230For Table for A5, D5 and D6 see page 230
Chart for Median and RangeChart for Median and Range
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Chart for Median and RangeChart for Median and Range
84
FIGURE 6-31 Control Charts for Median and Range
FIGURE 6-31 Control Charts for Median and Range
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
85
Used when only one measurement is taken on quality characteristic
Too expensiveTime consumingDestructiveVery few items
Chart for Individual valuesChart for Individual values
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
86
2.660
2.660
3.267
(0)
x
x
R
R
X RX R
g g
UCL X R
LCL X R
UCL R
LCL R
To use those equations, you have to use a moving range with n=2To use those equations, you have to use a moving range with n=2
Chart for Individual ValuesChart for Individual Values
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
87
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
3
3
3.686
(0)
new new
x
x
R
R
X X R R
UCL X
LCL X
UCL R
LCL
Chart for Individual ValuesChart for Individual Values
Revised Limits:
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Chart for Individual ValuesChart for Individual Values
88
FIGURE 6-32 Control Charts for Individual Values and Moving Range
89
Charts with Non-Acceptance Charts with Non-Acceptance LimitsLimits
Non-Acceptance limits have the same Relationship to averages as specificationshave to individual values. Control Limits tell what the process is capable of doing, and reject limits tell when the product is conforming to specifications.
90
Charts with Non-Acceptance Charts with Non-Acceptance LimitsLimits
Figure 6-35 Relationship of non-acceptance limits, control limitsand specifications.
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Exponential Weighted Exponential Weighted AverageAverage
Gives greatest weight to most recent values The EWMA is defined by the euqation Vt = lXt + 11 - l2Vt-1 where V t = the EWMA of the most recent
plotted point V t− 1 = the EWMA of the previous plotted
point l = the weight given to the subgroup average
or individual value Xt = the subgroup average or individual value
91
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Exponential Weighted Exponential Weighted AverageAverage
Gives greatest weight to most recent values The EWMA is defined by the euqation Vt = λ Xbart + (1 – λ) Vt-1
where Vt = most recent plotted point Vt−1 = previous plotted point λ= weight given to subgroup
average or individual value Xbar = the subgroup average or
individual value
92
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Exponential Weighted Exponential Weighted AverageAverage
UCL = Xdbar + A2Rbar(((SqRt(λ/(2 – λ)))
LCL = Xdbar - A2Rbar(((SqRt(λ/(2 – λ)))
93
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
94
Exponential Weighted
Average
Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield
© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Computer ProgramComputer Program
Computer Program file names are:Xbar and RMd and RX and MREWMAProcess Capability
95