quality improvement

93
Quality Quality Improvement Improvement PowerPoint presentation to accompany PowerPoint presentation to accompany Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e Chapter 6- Control Chapter 6- Control Charts for Variables Charts for Variables

Upload: alijah

Post on 06-Jan-2016

131 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Quality Improvement. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e. Chapter 6- Control Charts for Variables. The Control Chart Techniques State of Introduction Control Specifications Process Capability Different Control Charts. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality Improvement

Quality Quality ImprovementImprovement

Quality Quality ImprovementImprovement

PowerPoint presentation to accompanyPowerPoint presentation to accompany

Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9eBesterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e

PowerPoint presentation to accompanyPowerPoint presentation to accompany

Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9eBesterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e

Chapter 6- Control Chapter 6- Control Charts for VariablesCharts for VariablesChapter 6- Control Chapter 6- Control

Charts for VariablesCharts for Variables

Page 2: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

2

OutlineOutline

The Control Chart Techniques State of Introduction Control Specifications Process Capability Different Control Charts

Page 3: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

3

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

When you have completed this chapter you should:

Know the three categories of variation and their sources.

Understand the concept of the control chart method.

Know the purpose of variable control charts. Know how to select the quality characteristics,

the rational subgroup and the method of taking samples

Page 4: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

4

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

When you have completed this chapter you should:

Be able to calculate the central value, trial control limits and the revised control limits for Xbar and

R chart. Be able to explain what is meant by a process in

control and the various out-of-control patterns. Know the difference between individual

measurements and averages; control limits and specifications.

Page 5: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

5

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

When you have completed this chapter you should:

Know the different situations between the process spread and specifications and what can be done to correct the undesirable situation.

Be able to calculate process capability.

Page 6: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

6

The variation concept is a law of nature in that no two natural items are the same.

The variation may be quite large and easily noticeable

The variation may be very small. It may appear that items are identical; however, precision instruments will show difference

The ability to measure variation is necessary before it can be controlled

variationvariation

Page 7: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

7

There are three categories of variation in piece part production:

1. Within-piece variation: Surface

2. Piece-to-piece variation: Among pieces produced at the same time

3. Time-to-time variation: Difference in product produced at different times of the day

VariationVariation

Page 8: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

8

Materials

ToolsTools

OperatorsOperators MethodsMethods MeasurementMeasurement InstrumentsInstruments

HumanHumanInspectionInspectionPerformancePerformance

EnvironmentEnvironmentMachinesMachines

INPUTSINPUTS PROCESSPROCESS OUTPUTSOUTPUTS

VariationVariation

Sources of Variation in production processes:

Page 9: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

9

Sources of variation are:1. Equipment:

1. Toolwear2. Machine vibration3. Electrical fluctuations etc.

2. Material1. Tensile strength2. Ductility3. Thickness4. Porosity etc.

VariationVariation

Page 10: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

10

Sources of variation are:3. Environment

1. Temperature2. Light3. Radiation4. Humidity etc.

4. Operator1. Personal problem2. Physical problem etc.

VariationVariation

Page 11: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

12

Variable datax-bar and R-chartsx-bar and s-chartsCharts for individuals (x-charts)

Attribute dataFor “defectives” (p-chart, np-chart)For “defects” (c-chart, u-chart)

Control ChartsControl Charts

Page 12: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

13

ControlCharts

RChart

VariablesCharts

AttributesCharts

XChart

PChart

CChart

Continuous Numerical Data

Categorical or Discrete Numerical Data

Control ChartsControl Charts

Page 13: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

14

The control chart for variables is a means of visualizing the variations that occur in the central tendency and the mean of a set of observations. It shows whether or not a process is in a stable state.

Control Charts for VariablesControl Charts for Variables

Page 14: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

15

Control ChartsControl Charts

Figure 5-1 Example of a control chart

Page 15: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

16

Control ChartsControl Charts

Figure 6-1 Example of a method of reporting inspection results

Page 16: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

17

The objectives of the variable control charts are:

1. For quality improvement

2. To determine the process capability

3. For decisions regarding product specifications

4. For current decisions on the production process

5. For current decisions on recently produced items

Variable Control ChartsVariable Control Charts

Page 17: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

18

Procedure for establishing a pair of control charts for the average Xbar and the range R:

1. Select the quality characteristic

2. Choose the rational subgroup

3. Collect the data

4. Determine the trial center line and control limits

5. Establish the revised central line and control limits

6. Achieve the objective

Control Chart TechniquesControl Chart Techniques

Page 18: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

19

The Quality characteristic must be measurable. It can expressed in terms of the seven basic units:

1.Length2.Mass3.Time4.Electrical current5.Temperature6.Subatance7.Luminosity

Quality CharacteristicQuality Characteristic

Page 19: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

20

A rational subgroup is one in which the variation within a group is due only to chance causes.

Within-subgroup variation is used to determine the control limits.

Variation between subgroups is used to evaluate long-term stability.

Rational SubgroupRational Subgroup

Page 20: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

21

There are two schemes for selecting the subgroup samples:

1. Select subgroup samples from product or service produced at one instant of time or as close to that instant as possible

2. Select from product or service produced over a period of time that is representative of all the products or services

Rational SubgroupRational Subgroup

Page 21: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

22

The first scheme will have a minimum variation within a subgroup.The second scheme will have a minimum variation among subgroups.The first scheme is the most commonly used since it provides a particular time reference for determining assignable causes.The second scheme provides better overall results and will provide a more accurate picture of the quality.

Rational SubgroupRational Subgroup

Page 22: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

23

As the subgroup size increases, the control limits become closer to the central value, which make the control chart more sensitive to small variations in the process average

As the subgroup size increases, the inspection cost per subgroup increases

When destructive testing is used and the item is expensive, a small subgroup size is required

Subgroup SizeSubgroup Size

Page 23: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

24

From a statistical basis a distribution of subgroup averages are nearly normal for groups of 4 or more even when samples are taken from a non-normal distribution

When a subgroup size of 10 or more is used, the s chart should be used instead of the R chart. .

See Table 6-1 for (total) sample sizes

Subgroup SizeSubgroup Size

Page 24: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

25

Data collection can be accomplished using the type of figure shown in Figure 6-2.

It can also be collected using the method in Table 6-2.

It is necessary to collect a minimum of 25 subgroups of data.

A run chart can be used to analyze the data in the development stage of a product or prior to a state of statistical control

Data CollectionData Collection

Page 25: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

26

Run ChartRun Chart

Figure 6-4 Run Chart for data of Table 6-2

Page 26: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

27

Trial Central LinesTrial Central Lines

Central Lines are obtained using:

1 1

g g

i ii i

i

i

X RX and R

g g

where

X average of subgroup averages

X average of the ith subgroup

g number of subgroups

R average of subgroup ranges

R range of the ith subgroup

Page 27: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

28

Trial Control LimitsTrial Control Limits

Trial control limits are established at ±3 standard deviatons from the central value

3 3

3 3

R RX X

R RX X

X

R

UCL X UCL R

LCL X LCL R

where

UCL=upper control limit

LCL=lower control limit

population standard deviation of the subgroup averages

population standard deviation of the range

Page 28: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

29

Trial Control LimitsTrial Control Limits

In practice calculations are simplified by using the following equations where A2,D3

and D4 are factors that vary with the

subgroupsize and are found in Table B of the Appendix.

2 4

2 3

RX

RX

UCL X A R UCL D R

LCL X A R LCL D R

Page 29: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

30

Trial Control LimitsTrial Control Limits

Figure 6-5 Xbar and R chart for preliminary data with trial control limits

Page 30: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

31

Revised Central LinesRevised Central Lines

d dnew new

d d

d

d

d

X X R RX and R

g g g g

where

X discarded subgroup averages

g number of discarded subgroups

R discarded subgroup ranges

Page 31: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

32

Standard ValuesStandard Values

00 0 0

2

new newR

X X R R andd

0 0 2 0

0 0 1 0

RX

RX

UCL X A UCL D

LCL X A LCL D

Page 32: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

33Figure 6-6 Trial control limits and revised control limits for Xbar and R charts

Page 33: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

34

Achieve the ObjectiveAchieve the Objective

Figure 5-7 Continuing use of control charts, showing improved quality

Page 34: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

35

Revised Central LinesRevised Central Lines

d dnew new

d d

d

d

d

X X R RX and R

g g g g

where

X discarded subgroup averages

g number of discarded subgroups

R discarded subgroup ranges

Page 35: Quality Improvement

36

Sample Standard Deviation Sample Standard Deviation Control ChartControl Chart

For subgroup sizes >=10, an s chart is more accurate than an R Chart.Trial control limits are given by:

1 1

3 4

3 3

g gi ii i

sX

sX

s Xs X

g g

UCL X A s UCL B s

LCL X A s LCL B s

Page 36: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

37

Revised Limits for s chartRevised Limits for s chart

0

00 0

4

0 0 6 0

0 0 5 0

4 5 6, , ,

dnew

d

dnew

d

sX

sX

d

X XX X

g g

s s ss s

g g c

UCL X A UCL B

LCL X A LCL B

where

s discarded subgroup averages

c A B B factors found in Table B

Page 37: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

38

Process in Control When special causes have been

eliminated from the process to the extent that the points plotted on the control chart remain within the control limits, the process is in a state of control

When a process is in control, there occurs a natural pattern of variation

State of ControlState of Control

Page 38: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

39

State of ControlState of Control

Figure 6-9 Natural pattern of variation of a control chart

Page 39: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

40

Types of errors: Type I, occurs when looking for a special

cause of variation when in reality a common cause is present

Type II, occurs when assuming that a common cause of variation is present when in reality there is a special cause

State of ControlState of Control

Page 40: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

41

When the process is in control:

1. Individual units of the product or service will be more uniform

2. Since the product is more uniform, fewer samples are needed to judge the quality

3. The process capability or spread of the process is easily attained from 6ơ

4. Trouble can be anticipated before it occurs

State of ControlState of Control

Page 41: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

42

When the process is in control:

5. The % of product that falls within any pair of values is more predictable

6. It allows the consumer to use the producer’s data

7. It is an indication that the operator is performing satisfactorily

State of ControlState of Control

Page 42: Quality Improvement

Common Common CausesCauses

Special Special CausesCauses

45

Page 43: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

44

State of ControlState of Control

Figure 6-11 Frequency Distribution of subgroup averages with control limits

Page 44: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

45

When a point (subgroup value) falls outside its control limits, the process is out of control.

Out of control means a change in the process due to a special or assignable cause.A process can also be considered out of control even when the points fall inside the 3ơ limits

State of ControlState of Control

Page 45: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

46

It is not natural for seven or more consecutive points to be above or below the central line.

Also when 10 out of 11 points or 12 out of 14 points are located on one side of the central line, it is unnatural.

Six points in a row are steadily increasing or decreasing indicate an out of control situation

State of ControlState of Control

Page 46: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

47

Patterns in Control ChartsPatterns in Control Charts

Figure 6-12 Some unnatural runs-process out of control

Page 47: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

State of ControlState of Control

Simplified rule: Divide space into two equal zones of 1.5σ.

Out of control occurs when two consecutive points are beyond 1.5σ.

See Figure 6-13

48

Page 48: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

49

Patterns in Control ChartsPatterns in Control Charts

Figure 6-13 Simplified rule for out-of-control pattern

Page 49: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

50

1. Change or jump in level.

2. Trend or steady change in level

3. Recurring cycles

4. Two populations (also called mixture)

5. Mistakes

Out-of-Control ConditionOut-of-Control Condition

Page 50: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

51

Out-of-Control PatternsOut-of-Control Patterns

Change or jump inlevel Trend or steady change in level

Recurring cycles Two populations

Page 51: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

52

SpecificationsSpecifications

Figure 5-18 Comparison of individual values compared to averages

Page 52: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

53

Calculations of the average for both the individual values and for the subgroup avergaes are the same. However the sample standard deviation is different.

SpecificationsSpecifications

X

X

nwhere

population standard deviation of subgroup averages

population standard deviation of individual values

n=subgroup size

If we assume normality, then the population standard deviation

can be

4

sestimated from

c

Page 53: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

54

If the population from which samples are taken is not normal, the distribution of sample averages will tend toward normality provided that the sample size, n, is at least 4. This tendency gets better and better as the sample size gets larger. The standardized normal can be used for the distribution averages with the modification.

Central Limit TheoremCentral Limit Theorem

X

X XZ

n

Page 54: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

55

Central Limit TheoremCentral Limit Theorem

Figure 6-19 Illustration of central limit theorem

Page 55: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

56

Central Limit TheoremCentral Limit Theorem

Figure 6-20 Dice illustration of central limit theorem

Page 56: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

57

The control limits are established as a function of the average

Specifications are the permissible variation in the size of the part and are, therefore, for individual values

The specifications or tolerance limits are established by design engineers to meet a particular function

Control Limits & Control Limits & SpecificationsSpecifications

Page 57: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

58

Figure 6-21 Relationship of limits, specifications, and distributions

Control Limits & Control Limits & SpecificationsSpecifications

Page 58: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

59

The process spread will be referred to as the process capability and is equal to 6σ

The difference between specifications is called the tolerance

When the tolerance is established by the design engineer without regard to the spread of the process, undesirable situations can result

Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance

Page 59: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

60

Three situations are possible: Case I: When the process capability is

less than the tolerance 6σ<USL-LSL Case II: When the process capability is

equal to the tolerance 6σ=USL-LSL Case III: When the process capability is

greater than the tolerance 6σ >USL-LSL

Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance

Page 60: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

61

Case I: When the process capability is less than the tolerance 6σ<USL-LSL

Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance

Figure 6-24 Case I 6σ<USL-LSL

Page 61: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

62

Case II: When the process capability is equal to the tolerance 6σ=USL-LSL

Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance

Figure 6-24 Case I 6σ=USL-LSL

Page 62: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

63

Case III: When the process capability is less than the tolerance 6σ>USL-LSL

Process Capability & Process Capability & ToleranceTolerance

Figure 6-24 Case I 6σ>USL-LSL

Page 63: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

64

The range over which the natural variation of a process occurs as determined by the system of common or random causes

Measured by the proportion of output that can be produced within design specifications

Process CapabilityProcess Capability

Page 64: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

65

This following method of calculating the process capability assumes that the process is stable or in statistical control:

Take 25 (g) subgroups of size 4 for a total of 100 measurements

Calculate the range, R, for each subgroup

Calculate the average range, RBar= ΣR/g

Calculate the estimate of the population standard deviation

Process capability will equal 6σ0

Process CapabilityProcess Capability

0

2

R

d

Page 65: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

66

The process capability can also be obtained by using the standard deviation:

Take 25 (g) subgroups of size 4 for a total of 100 measurements Calculate the sample standard deviation, s, for each subgroup Calculate the average sample standard deviation, sbar = Σs/g Calculate the estimate of the population

standard deviation Process capability will equal 6σo

Process CapabilityProcess Capability

0

4

s

c

Page 66: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

67

Process capability and tolerance are combined to form the capability index.

Capability IndexCapability Index

0

0

6

6

p

p

USL LSLC

where C capabilityindex

USL LSL tolerance

process capability

Page 67: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

68

The capability index does not measure process performance in terms of the nominal or target value. This measure is accomplished by Cpk.

Capability IndexCapability Index

0

{( ) ( )

3

6

pk

p

Min USL X or X LSLC

where C capabilityindex

USL LSL tolerance

process capability

Page 68: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

69

Cp = USL - LSL 6 ơo

(USL- ¯X), (¯X-LSL)} Cpk = min{

The Capability Index does not measureprocess performance in terms of the nominal or target

Capability IndexCapability Index

Page 69: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

70

1. The Cp value does not change as the process center changes

2. Cp=Cpk when the process is centered3. Cpk is always equal to or less than Cp4. A Cpk = 1 indicates that the process is

producing product that conforms to specifications

5. A Cpk < 1 indicates that the process is producing product that does not conform to specifications

Capability IndexCapability Index

Page 70: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

71

6. A Cp < 1 indicates that the process is not capable

7. A Cpk=0 indicates the average is equal to one of the specification limits

8. A negative Cpk value indicates that the average is outside the specifications

Capability IndexCapability Index

Page 71: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

72

Cpk = negative number

Cpk = zero

Cpk = between 0 and 1

Cpk = 1

Cpk > 1

CCpkpk Measures Measures

Page 72: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

73

Charts for Better Operator Understanding:

1. Placing individual values on the chart: This technique plots both the individual values and the subgroup average. Not recommended since it does not provide much information.

2. Chart for subgroup sums: This technique plots the subgroup sum, ΣX, rather than the group average, Xbar.

Different Control ChartsDifferent Control Charts

( )

( )

X X

X X

UCL n UCL

UCL n LCL

Page 73: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

74

FIGURE 6-27 Chart forIndividual Values & Subgroup Averages

FIGURE 6-28 Subgroup Sum Chart

Page 74: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

75

Charts for Variable Subgroup Size:

Used when the sample size is not the same Different control limits for each subgroup As n increases, limits become narrower As n decreases, limits become wider apart Difficult to interpret and explain To be avoided

Different Control ChartsDifferent Control Charts

Page 75: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

76

FIGURE 6-29 Chart for Variable Subgroup Size

Page 76: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

77

Chart for Trends:

Used when the plotted points have an upward or downward trend that can be attributed to an unnatural pattern of variation or a natural pattern such as tool wear.

The central line is on a slope, therefore its equation must be determined.

Different Control ChartsDifferent Control Charts

Page 77: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

79

Chart for TrendsChart for Trends

Figure 6-32 Chart for Trend

Page 78: Quality Improvement

80

Used when we cannot have multiple observations per time period

ValueValue XbarXbar RR

4444

4646

5454 48.0048.00 1010

3838 46.0046.00 1616

4949 47.0047.00 1616

4646 44.3344.33 1111

4545 46.6746.67 44

3131 40.6740.67 1515

5555 43.6743.67 2424

3737 41.0041.00 2424

4242 44.6744.67 1818

4343 40.6740.67 66

4747 44.0044.00 55

5151 47.0047.00 88

XX

n

RR

n

NOTE: n here is equal to 12, NOT 14

Chart for Moving Average Chart for Moving Average and and

Moving RangeMoving Range

An example

Page 79: Quality Improvement

81

Extreme readings have a greater effect than in conventional charts. An extreme value is used several times in the calculations, the number of times depends on the averaging period.

Chart for Moving Average Chart for Moving Average and Moving Rangeand Moving Range

Page 80: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

82

This is a simplified variable control chart. Minimizes calculations Easier to understand Can be easily maintained by operators Recommended to use a subgroup of 3,

then all data is used.

Chart for Median and RangeChart for Median and Range

Page 81: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

83

5

5

6

5

MD Md Md

MD Md Md

R Md

R Md

UCL Md A R

LCL Md A R

UCL D R

LCL D R

For Table for A5, D5 and D6 see page 230For Table for A5, D5 and D6 see page 230

Chart for Median and RangeChart for Median and Range

Page 82: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

Chart for Median and RangeChart for Median and Range

84

FIGURE 6-31 Control Charts for Median and Range

FIGURE 6-31 Control Charts for Median and Range

Page 83: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

85

Used when only one measurement is taken on quality characteristic

Too expensiveTime consumingDestructiveVery few items

Chart for Individual valuesChart for Individual values

Page 84: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

86

2.660

2.660

3.267

(0)

x

x

R

R

X RX R

g g

UCL X R

LCL X R

UCL R

LCL R

To use those equations, you have to use a moving range with n=2To use those equations, you have to use a moving range with n=2

Chart for Individual ValuesChart for Individual Values

Page 85: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

87

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

0

3

3

3.686

(0)

new new

x

x

R

R

X X R R

UCL X

LCL X

UCL R

LCL

Chart for Individual ValuesChart for Individual Values

Revised Limits:

Page 86: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

Chart for Individual ValuesChart for Individual Values

88

FIGURE 6-32 Control Charts for Individual Values and Moving Range

Page 87: Quality Improvement

89

Charts with Non-Acceptance Charts with Non-Acceptance LimitsLimits

Non-Acceptance limits have the same Relationship to averages as specificationshave to individual values. Control Limits tell what the process is capable of doing, and reject limits tell when the product is conforming to specifications.

Page 88: Quality Improvement

90

Charts with Non-Acceptance Charts with Non-Acceptance LimitsLimits

Figure 6-35 Relationship of non-acceptance limits, control limitsand specifications.

Page 89: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

Exponential Weighted Exponential Weighted AverageAverage

Gives greatest weight to most recent values The EWMA is defined by the euqation Vt = lXt + 11 - l2Vt-1 where V t = the EWMA of the most recent

plotted point V t− 1 = the EWMA of the previous plotted

point l = the weight given to the subgroup average

or individual value Xt = the subgroup average or individual value

91

Page 90: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

Exponential Weighted Exponential Weighted AverageAverage

Gives greatest weight to most recent values The EWMA is defined by the euqation Vt = λ Xbart + (1 – λ) Vt-1

where Vt = most recent plotted point Vt−1 = previous plotted point λ= weight given to subgroup

average or individual value Xbar = the subgroup average or

individual value

92

Page 91: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

Exponential Weighted Exponential Weighted AverageAverage

UCL = Xdbar + A2Rbar(((SqRt(λ/(2 – λ)))

LCL = Xdbar - A2Rbar(((SqRt(λ/(2 – λ)))

93

Page 92: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

94

Exponential Weighted

Average

Page 93: Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement, 9eDale H. Besterfield

© 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, IncUpper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

Computer ProgramComputer Program

Computer Program file names are:Xbar and RMd and RX and MREWMAProcess Capability

95