q+q=?

9
Q+Q=? A case study on putting quant and qual back together for online concept testing

Upload: soqual

Post on 07-Aug-2015

13 views

Category:

Marketing


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Q+Q=?

Q+Q=?A case study on putting quant and qual back together for

online concept testing

Page 2: Q+Q=?

In the good old offline days combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques

was considered to be a desirable approach to any nontrivial research story. In

such cases qual was either meant to set the stage shaping the subject for

consequent quant part and/or to explain the results of the latest.

Nowadays modern technology offer new ways for more seamless integration of

qual and quant. Can we researchers benefit from putting Q and Q back together?

Why re-marrying Q and Q?

Page 3: Q+Q=?

Scope

Client: a major consumer electronics

retailer.

Problem: the Client is constantly

launching new promos. Generating new

promo ideas and mechanics is

becoming increasingly difficult.

Objectives: 1) test 13 new promo ideas,

2) enhance them, 3) co-create new

ideas.

Our approach. We opted for a mix-mode 3 step study:

1. Initial evaluation (Quant) — a sequential concept test.

2. Idea enhancement (Qual) — a moderated bulletin board discussion.

3. Result validation (Qual) — same as step 1, a research-on-research step.

Page 4: Q+Q=?

Concepts: look and feel

Name «NAME» «NAME» «NAME»

Insight

Mechanics

RTB

Page 5: Q+Q=?

Project design

Step Design Outcome

Initial evaluation

(Quant)

13 concepts, N=2400

respondents, LOI=20 min, one

respondent tests 2 concepts for.

Concepts were ranked based on

overall liking and perceived

uniqueness. Five concepts have

been chosen for further

development.

Idea enhancement

(Quant)

Five concepts and 40

respondents from the Step 1, 5-

day moderated bulletin board.

As the result of the stage two

concepts were rewritten and two

brand new concepts were co-

created. Seven concepts in total.

Result validation

(Quant)

Seven concepts from the step

2; 1080 fresh respondents,

LOI=20 mins, one respondent

tests 2 concepts for.

The seven concepts from the Step

2 incl. rewritten and new once

were re-ranked again in order to

evaluate if the Step 2 was effective

or not.

Page 6: Q+Q=?

Experiment flow

Concepts are ranked.

13 initial concepts

Five concepts are

chosen for further

development.

Two concepts re-

written and two new

concepts (grey balls)

are co-created during

the Step 2.

Page 7: Q+Q=?

Co-creation pays off

New (co-created)

concepts rock!

One of the re-written

concepts appeared to be

slightly improved

(number 13 moved from

red to yellow).

And one of the re-written

concepts was ruined :).

Page 8: Q+Q=?

Conclusions

Overall the mix-mode approach allowed to achieve actionable business

significant results at the same time cutting both time and money

budgets.

Recruiting participants for qualitative (enhancement) stage from the prior

quantitative (initial idea evaluation) stage proved to be a smooth and

streamlined process that is also paid off in higher than average

participant engagement during the qualitative stage.

As a result, the Client not only got the initial concepts ranked, but also

enhanced them and developed entirely new ready to use concepts via

the co-creation process.