purposes of school algebra
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
1/33
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BEHAVIOR
14,
41-73 (1995)
Purpose in School Algebra
ALAN BELL
The Uni versity of Nottingham
Algebra is commonly regarded as a problem area for many students, which has led
teachers in schools to question its necessity, whereas lecturers of tertiary-level courses
continue to complain of incoming students lack of algebraic skill.
In considering how this situation should be addressed, I need first to clarify the aims
and objectives of the school algebra course. I then
review
the research evidence on
students performance and proceed to
some
suggestions for curriculum modifications that
might be helpful.
AIMS OF SCHOOL ALGEBRA
I give a few examples of tasks to focus the discussion.
Most
of these are from
examination papers for the most able 25% of 16-year-olds. Which of these would
you regard as representing the aims of a school algebra course?
Example 1:
(a) Show that the sum of a number of four digits and the number formed by
reversing the digits is always divisible by 11.
(b) The greatest and least of four consecutive numbers are multiplied together; so
also are the middle pair. Show that the difference of the two products is always 2.
Example 2:
(a) A boat rows a certain distance upstream at 2 mph, stops for an hour, and
returns at 4 mph. The total time is 3.5 hours. What is the distance each way?
(b) Same questions with speeds 2.6 mph and 4.1 mph.
Example 3:
(a) The cost per hour of running a ship is a fixed amount of La together with a
variable amount of fbV3 which depends upon the speed
V
miles per hour) of the
ship. The total cost of a journey of d miles at a uniform speed of V miles per hour is
fC. Prove that C = d a/V + bV2).
Given that a = 3.3, V = 15, d = 3000, and C = 1300, calculate b correct to two
significant figures.
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be sent to Alan Bell, Shell Centre for
Mathematical Education, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NC7 2RD, United Kingdom.
41
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
2/33
42
BELL
Example 4:
Show that, if 2s = a +
b + c,
(a) s(s - a) + (s -
b) s - c) = bc
(b)
s2 -
(s -
a)2
b+c
=-
s - c)~ - s - b)2 b - c
Example 5:
PIZZA PRICES
Size
Mini
Small
Medium
Large
Family
Diameter of
Pizza Plate
20 cm
25 cm
21.5 cm
30.5 cm
38 cm
cost
$ 4.00
$ 5.00
$ 7.50
$ 8.60
$10.50
Explore the relations between diameter and cost, and discuss which size is good
value.
The first of these examples requires the problem to be represented alge-
braically, using knowledge of place value, as
1000~ + 1OOb+ 10~ + d + IOOOd + 100~ + lob + a)
which leads, in two steps, to
1001 (a + 6) + 110
b + c)
which is easily verified to be a multiple of 11.
The second part of the question involves expressing the consecutive numbers
as n, IZ + 1, II + 2, n + 3, leading to
n (n + 3) - (n + l)(n + 2)
which on multiplication shows that the difference is 2, independent of n.
This problem thus demands formulation in algebraic terms, some manipula-
tion, and finally interpretation of the conclusion. This is a typical example of the
use of algebra to establish generalizations-except that the full process includes
the discovery of the generalization, not simply its proof.
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
3/33
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
4/33
44
BELL
compared with the three modes of algebraic use illustrated by Examples 1, 2, and
5 and which we shall take as our curriculum framework:
Generalizing.
Forming and solving equations.
Working with functions and formulae.
Students need to become competent in handling these processes, not just in
the symbol manipulations represented by Example 4. Moreover, it appears that
conceptual obstacles arise less frequently and are easier to overcome when the
work is embedded in appropriate meaningful activities of these kinds. This claim
will be discussed more fully in the last main section of this article. In the next
section, I review the evidence from research regarding the nature and extent of
difficulties that students experience in the learning of algebra in existing courses.
I first look at research indicating how far students are able to handle the three
general processes previously listed-generalizing, forming and solving equa-
tions, and working with functions and formulae. Then I report some work that
cuts across the three main categories.
RESEARCH ON GENERAL ALGEBRAIC STRATEGIES
Generalizing
Generalizing was the focus of a study by Lee and Wheeler (1987). It concerned
the algebraic thinking of 15-year-old students, focusing on their conceptions of
generalization and justification. Three hundred and fifty four students were
tested, using 12 problems, and 25 individual interviews were subsequently con-
ducted. The problems demanded the use of algebraic language in reasoning about
situations.
The first problem used was:
Is the statement
Say how you know.
2.x+ I
1
2x+1+7=8
definitely true?
possibly true?
never true?
The general conclusion here was definitely true, but for two distinct
reasons-either the 2~s were canceled, or cross-multiplying led to an equation
which was then solved, or at least seen to be solvable. Those who canceled were
asked to check by putting a numerical value for n, but no one was able to use this
to recognize that the equation is true for x = 0 but for no other value. Hence, the
concept of an equation-like statement being true for some values of x, but not for
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
5/33
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
6/33
46
BELL
About half of the students tested were able to express consecutive numbers as a,
a + 1 and to obtain 2a + 1; they then tried various substitutions and manipula-
tions, but few could give a general argument to show that this sum must be odd.
In another question, fewer still could explain why x(x + 1) is even.
Thus, the central purpose of algebra was perceived by these students as the
performance of some manipulation; its use as a mode of expression of some
generalizations, allowing discussion of the conditions of their truth, or as the
basis of an argument, was absent.
Another study of typical 15-year-old students ability to explain and justify
generalizations also showed a low level of application of algebra. One of the
tasks required deriving and explaining the fact that if the same number is added
to 10, and subtracted from 10, the sum of the two results is always 20. Only 3 of
4 1 students even attempted to represent the situation algebraically; the remainder
used verbal explanations, often failing to distinguish data from conclusion (Bell,
1976).
Forming and Solving Equations
The forming of equations was the subject of a study by Galvin and Bell (1977).
Here the evidence showed a strong tendency for students to write the arithmetical
calculations required to solve the problem. Writing an equation to represent the
problem, and then working with the equation instead of with the original prob-
lem, was a major obstacle. Perhaps this is the most important difference between
arithmetic and algebra. Galvin and Bell stated:
It appeared that equations represented a quite distinctive form of expression which
was unlikely to be adopted by the pupils spontaneously unless they both recognised
that this expression led to the possibility of algorithms for solution, and also that
they had had some practice in the solution
of such equations resulting in the
solution of the corresponding problem, that is they needed to know that equations
could be manipulated and solved in order to decide that it was worthwhile trying to
formulate the problem in this way. (p. ii)
The other question that arose was whether it is more advantageous to use
suggestive letters, such as h for head and b for body, or conventional ones, like x
and y. It appeared that the use of suggestive letters facilitated the initial writing of
equations, but was less helpful at the subsequent stage of manipulation. In
proceeding from h = b/2 + 4 and b = h + 4 to the combined equation b = b/2
+ 4 + 4, it is necessary to stop thinking about h as head, b as body, and to think
of them as symbols which are manipulated and moved around according to
algebraic rules.
Functions and Formulae
Parts of the Lee and Wheeler (1987) study touched on functions in looking for
the ability to recognize and express a functional relationship in sequences of
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
7/33
PURPOSE IN SCHOOL ALGEBRA
47
numbers, in dot patterns, and in tables of values. They remarked that though
seeing a pattern was not a problem, students lacked flexibility in generating
sufficient possible patterns, in selecting useful ones, and in checking their validi-
ty (p. 146).
The generation of possible variables and relations in practical situations-
mathematical modeling-is a strong interest among curriculum developers, but
not very much research exists documenting students difficulties in perceiving the
relevance of algebra to such situations or their ability to see how to make
appropriate applications. However, material designed to display and evaluate
these modeling abilities was developed by Treilibs, Burkhardt, and Low (1980).
Their problems included one about the advice to give the management of a large
supermarket which is trying to estimate how many of the checkout tills should be
operating at any given time. As well as tests of the students ability to solve the
complete problems, subtests also dealt with generating variables, selecting vari-
ables, generating relationships, selecting relationships, and specifying questions.
On a sample of able 17-year-olds, all the tests (except selecting relationships) had
low correlations with mathematical attainment as measured by school tests and
teacher ratings, indicating that the development of the ability to apply algebra in
this way is a neglected area in the school curriculum.
Conceptual Obstacles
Firth (1975) showed that many lCyear-old students responded to a request to
add 15 to X by asserting that they could not do so until they knew the value of x;
they could not accept the unclosed x + 15 as an answer. However, subsequent
research has shown that this need not be a serious problem, given experience of
working in suitable contexts. For example, Sutherland (1992) showed that lo-
year-old pupils working with a computer spreadsheet can use such expressions;
see also the later part of this article. Another item investigated in Bell and Low
(1982), following Collis (1975), is
ll-6=0-11
This showed two kinds of error. At one level, the response was 5, indicating a
fixation on the early notion that = means makes. This directional approach
to the equals sign has been shown to persist even at college level (Kieran, 1981;
Mevarech & Yitschak, 1983; both quoted in Kieran, 1990). At another level, the
response was
6 showing the persistence of an assumption of commutativity
of subtraction probably deriving from experience with natural numbers. Each of
these errors has been shown to belong to a substantial complex of misconcep-
tions .
The so-called students and professors problem (Clement, 1982) has re-
ceived much attention in the research literature over the last 10 years. In the
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
8/33
48
BELL
original study, several groups of university engineering students were presented
with the problem:
Write an equation using the variables S and P to represent the following statement:
There are six times as many students as professors at this university. Use S for the
number of students and P for the number of professors.
It was found that 37% of the students answered incorrectly, and of these, 68%
represented the problem as 6S = P. A related result was reported by Mevarech
and Yitschak (1983), who found that 38% of the 150 college students they tested
answered that, given the equation 3k = m, k is greater than m.
MacGregor (1991) also studied this phenomenon. In a test based on her work, I
found some 40% of secondary-school students selecting the reversed response to a
similar additive question (a smaller minority selected the commuted 6 - m = k :
I have m dollars and you have k dollars. I have $6 more than you. Which
equation must be true?
6k = m 6m = k k+6=m m+6=k 6-m=k
The first and most obvious explanation offered for these errors is that students
tend to transliterate the verbal form: six students to every professor + 6s = P.
However, subsequent research showed that though this misconception governed
some cases, the error still occurred in translating from tabular or diagrammatic
representations into algebra. In these cases, the error appears to relate to an
associative link perceived in the statement 6S = P, the larger number S being
associated with 6. Wollman (1983) and MacGregor (1990) separately conducted
teaching experiments that show that improvements results from generating num-
bers to fit the equation, reflecting on which is the larger quantity, and expressing
the relationship verbally in different ways.
The incorrect direct transliteration of verbal statements into algebra, where
3a + 4b could be derived from 3 apples and 4 bananas (irreverently known as
fruit-salad algebra), has been shown to be a frequent source of error (Galvin &
Bell, 1977; Kiichemann, 1981), and is of course encouraged by some algebra
texts. In Kiichemanns test, only 10% of 14-year-olds correctly symbolized the
following problem, writing 5b + 6r = 90, whereas 17% gave instead b + r =
90:
Blue pencils cost 5 pence each and red pencils cost 6 pence each. I buy some blue
and some red pencils and altogether it costs me 90 pence.
If b is the number of blue pencils bought and if r is the number of red pencils
bought, what can you write down about b and r?
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
9/33
PURPOSE IN SCHOOL ALGEBRA
49
Misconceptions regarding the commutativity of the subtraction and (partic-
ularly) the division operations, and their notations, have been widely docu-
mented (Bell, Fischbein, & Greer, 1984; Bell, Greer, Grimison, & Mangan,
1989; Brown, 1981). At this point, I will only remark that whereas in an arithme-
tic problem any confusion or error in the order of a division operation, for
example, using 7.2 + 3 for 3 + 7.2, may be detected from the size of the answer;
in considering the rearrangements of D = S X T to T = DIS or SID, the error is
less easy to spot. In a question asking which of six such rearrangements of
formulae were also true, only 6% of secondary-school students chose the correct
two (Bell & Onslow, 1987).
Breakdowns in the equation concept at a higher level have been studied by
Filloy and Rojano (1985; see also Kieran, 1990). They showed that, whereas
equations containing a single occurrence of the variable (such as 3x - 5 = 22)
can often be solved intuitively, or by backtracking or unpacking, those in which
the variable appears twice, on both sides, as in examples of the type 3x - 5 = 2~
+ 22 or, indeed, 3x - 5 = 22 - 2x, need a more detached concept of equation.
Some algebraic errors appear initially to be more technical failures, or memo-
ry lapses. Examples of such errors are adding fractions by adding numerators and
denominators, false canceling of part of a term, manipulating directed numbers
according to the implicit rule drop sign while operating (e.g., - 11 - 6 =
-( 11 - 6) = -5), and treating exponents as multipliers (3* = 6). These all arise
from a failure to make important conceptual distinctions, and hence need to be
treated by an appeal to meanings rather than to the simple reassertion of a correct
rule.
Some Survey Results
Some specific data follow from the British national survey of 15-year-olds (Fox-
man, Martini, Tuson, & Cresswell, 1980-1982).
I. Evaluating d3 when
d =
3 (44% correct; 16% gave 9; 25% other; 15% no
answer).
2. (a) I am x years old. Peter is two years older. What is his age? (49% gave
x + 2; 10% gave 2.x)
(b) Similar question but with 1 more, 3 less, twice (all about 45% correct).
(c) Represent the number which is n bigger than 3 (27% correct; 24%
n > 3).
3. (a) What is x if 2x + 7 = 45? (73% correct)
(b) 2.x + 3x + 4x = 2.x + 21, what is x? (50% correct)
(c) If
A = L
X
B
tells us how to work out
A,
what formula tells us how to
work out L? (39% correct)
Any manipulations beyond these levels tended to have 30% facility with some
25% or more omissions.
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
10/33
5 BELL
AN APPROACH TO THE ALGEBRA CURRICULUM
With this background of research on the current state of understanding and
misunderstanding of algebra, I offer suggestions for a curriculum and a pedagogy
aimed at dealing with these problems. In general, the approach advocated is to
learn the algebraic language in a way similar to that in which the mother tongue
is learned; that is, by using it in order to communicate, with oneself and with
others, in the course of activities defined by the three main modes of activity
already described: (a) generalizing, (b) forming and solving equations, and (c)
working with functions and formulae.
As I have indicated, each of these strands embodies its own characteristic
purposes, and its own set of general strategies and procedures for achieving
them. There is, of course, some overlap, but fluent use of the language and
methods of algebra certainly includes the ability to handle each of these types of
situation confidently. One might make an analogy with the various uses of
language for description, instruction, expression, discussion, persuasion, and so
on. (The now common recognition of language competence as including speak-
ing, listening, reading, and writing can also suggest illuminating ways of think-
ing about mathematical activity.)
I also propose a pedagogy consisting of an alternation between broad activ-
ities embodying the main purposes of algebraic activity (and in particular, of
these three strands), and more focused activities aimed at acquiring particular
concepts or skills. I have called this
diagnostic teaching.
These focused activ-
ities, consisting mainly of provoked cognitive conflicts and intensive discussions
of critical conceptual points, have been shown to be strikingly more effective for
longer term retention than more usual methods (Bell, 1993a, 1993b; Bell,
Onslow, Pratt, Purdy, & Swan, 1985). In this article I consider broad activities
aimed at developing strategic abilities to handle the three strands we have been
discussing. My claim is that these provide a context in which specific misconcep-
tions can be more easily dealt with.
Generalizing
What needs to be learned about generalizing is the process of exploring a given
situation for patterns and relationships, organizing the data systematically, recog-
nizing the relations and expressing them verbally and symbolically, and seeking
explanation and appropriate kinds of justification or proof according to level.
Examples include, at the earlier stages, relations such as these illustrated by
9 = 4 + 5 = 3 + 6 = 2 + 7; 9 + 5 = 14 ==> 19 + 5 = 24; the digit patterns in
5, 10, 15,20 . . . and in 9, 18,27,36 . . . ; various patterns in the addition and
multiplication tables; Pascals triangle; and spiral patterns. The same process
applies to the study of the number field itself, with the recognition and expres-
sion of the general laws of associativity, commutativity, inverses, and so on.
Divisibility properties, such as that the sum of any three consecutive numbers
is divisible by 3, provide good examples of the power of algebra to prove general
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
11/33
PURPOSE IN SCHOOL ALGEBRA
51
properties. Here the method of expressing the number following n as IE + 1 will
arise, but this does not appear to be a serious obstacle when it is dealt with in
context. Similarly, expressing the number with digits x and y as 10x + y is
needed for a certain class of problems.
Harder generalizations will appear in problems such as that of determining the
number of games needed if each of, say, 22 teams is to play against each other
once. Trial of a few simple cases, then systematic organization of the trial data
and a search for pattern follow.
I now give some fuller examples related to the table of counting numbers 1 to
100, the multiplication table, and the calendar.
Days and Dates.
The generalizations in Days and Dates (see Figure 1)
appear not to have been previously noticed by many 1 I-tol2-year-olds, so mak-
DAYS AND DATES
L
Today is the 3rd of October and its my
birthday on the 23rd. Today is a
Monday. So my birthday will be on a
Sunday
c
Great for a party
Peter
f course. If you go 20 days on, its always one day earlier in
1 Is Rachel right? Explain.
2 What happens if you go forward
(a) 10 days; (b) M days; (c) 40 days; (d) 100 days?
3 Explain the rule which governs these problems.
Figure 1.
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
12/33
52
BELL
LINE PATTERNS
Take a copy of the Multiplication Square.
Find the box showing
14
0
21
28
Notice that 14 + 28 = 42
and2x21 =42
Try this other box in the same vertical line
28
0
35
42
Is it still true that T + B = 2M?
Try a few more, in the same line.
Try some similar boxes in other lines.
Try horizontal boxes also: Does L
+ R =
2M?
left right middle
Try lines of 4 and 5 numbers. Write what you find.
Use letters if you wish.
Figure 2A.
ing this link with a possible everyday situation is a good way of encouraging
awareness of mathematical relations in the real world.
Line Patterns and Corners and Middles. Line Patterns and Comers and
Middles (see Figures 2a & 2b) have proved to be good ways of getting pupils to
use algebraic language in situations where it forms a natural means of communi-
cation. Note that opportunities for checking, and understanding the possibility of
relations being true always, sometimes, or never, are built in also.
Some more extended individual explorations of these situations are shown in
Figure 3. These are from 13- and 14-year-old& but the examples could be used
earlier with faster pupils.
In Figure 3, Julia compares the sums of numbers in two similar L-shaped
boxes in the calendar. The difference in the numerical case is 44. We might
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
13/33
PURPOSE IN SCHOOL ALGEBRA
53
CORNERS AND MIDDLES
I I6 24 32 46 46 56(641 72 60 I6 90
9 I6 27 36 49 54 63172111 90 99 106
10 26 JO 46 90:bO 7OllOi 90,100 110.120
11 22133 44~53~66(77~66~99~ilO~I~~32
12 24136 46 (CO/ 721 64/96/106~110(132]144
Cut
out a frame to put
over this table.
B-A=C-B
(the B number - the A number) = (the C number - the B number)
Check that this is true in both the boxes shown
Check other places on the table.
So
B - A = C - B is
always true
.
Consider
A t D = F + I
This is never true. Check this.
. Consider E = 2A
This is sometimes true. Check this.
.
With your partner, make a list of 6 relations and challenge
another pair to decide whether they are always, never or
sometimes true. But sure of your answers first.
Try to get some of each type.
Figure
2%
expect another numerical example at this point, but instead she introduces n for
the number in the central cell, and obtains the difference as (4x + 22) -
(4x - 22) = 44, showing that the pattern is true everywhere on the square.
Students were encouraged to experiment and find their own patterns for
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
14/33
54
BELL
Julia is exploring patterns found by making L shaped boxes around some numbers
an old calendar. Notice how she has gene Aised the pattern with algebra in two
dBerent ways. This
shows that she has
real&d that
letters can stand for generalise
kt7t$. tX*\ t k+Z = 4xtkY
Xi \ Y+xt\ S+x+ntx*- J +A $+a
iul ia SwZSfu& haded the bracketted
eqressions, by thinking of their global
mcuring(~LmoreChanSr,taLB22leuthan4r).Somepupiistuddfficultierhere,
whichwerediswsedinWopa&Sons.
As WeU as thinking about meanings, pupil
experimmted by substituting numbers such as 10,3, KtO.... for x.
Figure 3
different shapes on the calendar, and to include some which did not give a regular
pattern. The second example (see Figure 4) is one in which the nongenerality of
the pattern is shown by the algebra. The difference x - 3 means, as the student
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
15/33
PURPOS IN S HOOL
ALGEBRA
55
says, the answer isnt always 13, but, in the case I took, x - 3 = 13. So the
difference will vary, depending on where the shape is.
These nongeneral relations show more vividly than the general ones how the
use of a letter as a generalized number demonstrates the generality or non-
generality of the proposed pattern.
A more ambitious pattern, using multiplication, is produced by James (see
Figure 5).
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
16/33
56
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
17/33
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
18/33
58
BELL
A
B
C D
2
5
1 a
1
6
2 7
3
4
0 9
0
7
3
6
Figure 6
can be generated. In this way, a very important idea is met in a quite elementary
setting and an intuitive familiarity with the possible transformations of a given
additive relationship is built up. Later, a systematic look at such a set leads to the
identification of formal rules that summarize the possible transformations of the
given additive relationship.
Forming and Solving Equations
The earliest examples may be missing number problems such as 8 + ? = 11 or
? - 7 = 5. The corresponding verbal or situational problems at this stage are not
normally solved by representing the problem symbolically and then transforming
it, but by a mental transformation into the solution form. Thus, a problem asking
how many marbles Jane had at first if she gave away 7 and had 5 left, would be
answered directly by adding 7 and 5. As the work progresses to more complex
problems, involving first one operation, then several, the same tension arises
between the questions which can be resolved mentally and those which require
symbolic representation by one or more equations which are then solved by
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
19/33
PURPOSE IN SCHOOL ALGEBRA
59
manipulation. Learning the solution methods for the different types of equation is
important here.
At a later stage still, this process is central to design problems where there are
sizes or quantities to be chosen and constraints to be met. An example is the
problem of designing a box of a given shape to have a given volume. A more
complex case is the general transportation problem where various quantities of
goods are to be carried as cheaply as possible from a number of sources to a
number of destinations, the cost of each journey being known. This involves
forming and solving a set of linear equations. The same general process is at the
core of many of the problems and puzzles that have fascinated humankind
throughout the history of mathematics. Here are two early ones:
Baker 1568
AD:
One man demaunded of another in the morning what oclok it was y other made
him this answr; yf you doo adde (sayth hee) the r/4 of the howers which be past
midnight with the % of the howers which are to come until noone, you shall haue
the just hower, that is to saye, you shall know what oclok it is.
Calandri 1491 AD:
A
lion can eat a sheep in one day, a leopard can eat it in two days, and a wolf in
three days.
How
long will it take all three?
The first of these leads to the equation
/4 h + % (12 - h) = h
and the somewhat unsatisfying solution
S1/17.
The second may be solved by
considering the reciprocals of the given rates, that is, a leopards daily meal is l/z
of a sheep, a wolfs is
V3
of a sheep, so in a day all three eat 15/6 sheep or one
sheep in VII day.
Bath-filling problems, and problems about electric resistances in parallel,
have the same structure: They require what we might call the reciprocal method
(or the harmonic method by analogy with the harmonic mean).
These two problems perhaps illustrate how algebraic symbolism becomes
advantageous for more complex problems. They also remind us of the motivating
power of a good puzzle, which we should aim to retain in school work.
Childrens first introduction to the notion of extracting an unknown number
from a statement expressing constraints may well be through missing-addend
questions. Later, steps toward more systematic equation forming and solving
may be taken by setting up diagrammatic situations containing hidden numbers.
These have the advantage that (a) they are self-checking and (b) the unknowns
have an obvious concrete existence, thus avoiding the difficulties associated with
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
20/33
60
BELL
having to decide what quantity to denote by x, and how to translate from verbal
information into symbolic statements. Arithmagons provide one example and
others follow.
Other Examples of Diagrammatic Situations. Other examples of possible
situations are Pyramids and Number Routes. In Pyramids the construction
rule is that a lower number is the sum of the two adjacent ones above it (see
Figure 7).
The mode of writing the equation may be suggested by the teacher, but is
normally readily adopted. The collection of terms and the solution of the equa-
tion may similarly be the subject of discussion but are normally accepted as self-
evidently good by the pupils. By changing the construction rule from
A + B
to
A + 2B, and then to A - B, more difficult manipulations arise. These need
dealing with by focused discussions and with experiments showing the validity
of laws such as 2(A +
B) = 2.A + 2B
and
A - (B - C) = A - B + C.
Number Routes is another type of concrete setting for equations (see Figure
8). Number Routes can be made harder by, for example, having addition or
subtraction before multiplication, which gives rise to the need for the distributive
law, and by making longer paths and more complex networks. Students can be
asked to make up their own examples, pitching them at a level of difficulty
suitable for themselves.
Forming Equations From Verbal Problems. The research quoted previously
shows that many students regard the purpose of all questions in algebra as the
r ,
5
4
5
X
4
5+x
x+4
21
21
5+x+x+4=21
2x+9=21
2x=12
x=6
Put in 6 for x; it is seen to be correct
Figure 7
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
21/33
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
22/33
62
BELL
Following this they were asked to work, in groups of three, at solving the next
question, taking each of the three piles in turn as X, and to compare their results.
On the following day, each group was asked to make up and solve three similar
problems, two easy and one hard, to be attempted by another group.
This led to a lot of insight into the way different assignments of x affected the
expressions, turning + into - and multiples into fractions. It also led to an
unexpected degree of richness in the problem statements. As well as four bean
bags,
and the numbers of pupils in three rival schools, we had A nuclear
scientist must complete 4 experiments to save the world, and has 23 days to do
them in. The first will take twice as long as the second. . .
To conclude, we may say that the main initial difficulties lay in expressing
relations such as Pile 3 has 15 more stones than Pile 2 when Pile 2 was x,
making Pile 3 x + 15; and more so when Pile 3 was x, needing a reversal to
make Pile 2 have X - 15; 10 less than x + 15 was a step up in difficulty.
However, although this was observed to be a serious obstacle for some students
in the early lessons, on being offered the answer they soon picked up the idea
and, in the school examination question on this work, no student failed to
formulate an equation, though there were some reversal mistakes.
Recognizing Equivalent Equations. The research quoted previously shows a
strong need for activities in which algebraic expressions and equations are treated
with common sense and normal understanding rather than by a number of special
rules that are liable to misinterpretation and not subject to normal critical apprais-
al. I sketch briefly one such activity.
Arithmagons provides another.
Giving Clues is another generic situation that leads naturally to the intuitive
recognition of equivalent equations. It also provides a body of experience on
which the study of sets of linear equations can be built.
(L - 3)/M = N
1
3M L= 1 2
4N M=2
3
These equations were put on the board; the teacher stated that he had chosen
three numbers, had denoted them by L, M, and N, and had written down these
three clues by which they might be found. The game was for each person to try to
find the numbers (by trial and error or by any other method). When a person had
found them and had checked that they satisfied all three equations, she was not to
say what the numbers were, but was to make up a new clue and offer it to be
added to the list.
It took some 5 min for the first person to find the numbers; after that clues
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
23/33
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
24/33
64
BELL
k'f~ ai(LCW fm,t :'sqw,bcwl
This is an interesting example, and
3 a@WOnd 2 Lorc &uS %,P 19 ,-.a+
successfully solved. EIut note the
2 b(inonaS
nd 1 CQ@X hW ~7 m jynj
attraction for adding all the equations,
1 camrot ond 2 Qrf/rs kol-~ jl ~0fia.
which might not have been helpful bad
mU MWj MjjWf dc.s4UIW Glut I-W-4.
the second
equation been different.
&+ Lb=39
Lb+ c ='+7
c +Ls=tS
U and
Y
This pupil seems
to be enjoying
himself, but has not noticed, so
far, that he has too few equations.
There is an opportunity here for
the teacher to discuss this point.
Figure 9.
value, showing the teacher what aspects of the situation have been recognized by
the pupils.
Working With Functions and Formulae
In work on functions and formulae, the typical situation is either a practical
situation that generates a sequence of numbers in some way, for example, a row
of squares made with matchsticks, or polygons of increasing size made on
pegboard, or sets of practical or experimental data, such as prices of a ferry
crossing for cars of different lengths. The usual task is to determine the rule
defining the function, to express it verbally (and later, symbolically) so as to be
able to interpolate and extrapolate from the data actually given to predict other
cases. The shape of the corresponding graph may be of interest and comparisons
may be made between the shape of the graphs obtained and those of known
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
25/33
PURPOSE IN SCHOOL ALGEBRA
65
functions. When an organized set of sequences is studied it becomes clear that
their difference patterns play an important part in recognizing and classifying the
types. Thus, one gathers knowledge of a variety of kinds of function; linear,
square, inverse, exponential, and wave (sine or cosine), together with the appro-
priate algebraic formulae. Equation solving to determine values comes in as a
part of this study.
Examples of such material will be discussed later. But, first, note that some
attention is also devoted to formula reading. I suggest some questions that can
form starting points for focused discussion on this point.
1. If three
numbers,
A, B,
and C are related so that
A X B = C,
in what other
ways can the relations be expressed?
2. If A = L X B, how do you get L if you know A and B?
3. If
V = w2h,
and h is doubled
while r is fixed, what happens to V?
Similarly, if r is doubled while h is fixed? And if r is doubled but V kept
fixed, what must happen to h?
4. Which of the following formulae do you think is most likely to be correct?
Underline your answer. Give reasons (k, n, and b are constants).
Force exerted on pedals when riding a bike with speed v mph.
F = kv F = kv2 F = k/v F = klv2
Pull of the earth on a satellite at height h.
P = kh P = kh2 F = k/h F = k/h2
Number of marbles of diameter d in a kilogram.
N = kd N = kld N = kld2 N = kid
Stopping distance of a car from a speed of v mph.
D = av + blv2 D = av + bv2 D = av
Among the broader activities on functions, the properties of sequences and
functions arising from practical or experimental data or from pure mathematical
situations are explored. Different ways of growing are compared and related to
difference patterns, graphs, and formulae; we may use the knowledge built up
both to understand better the way in which the situation works and to predict
values in particular cases. As before, the approach is essentially exploratory, the
students posing many of their own questions and checking the correctness and
completeness of their own findings.
The standard process for finding the expression for T,, (see Figure 10) some-
times causes difficulty. It can be eased if the reverse activity is experienced first,
that is, if various formulae are used to generate sequences, and the relation
between the type of formula and the difference pattern of the sequence becomes
familiar. The material (in Figure 11) has been used. A harder example is shown
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
26/33
66
BELL
Making Seauences
cl *
d33
cfk,...
e
T
T
..
n 1
Tn I
d
2
4
3
3 .
9
5 . .
n 1 2 3
Tn 2 5 8
d 3 3
n 1 2 3
total 8 12 16
d 4 4 .
Using matchsticks, cubes, dot or square grids make a sequence of objects which grow in some regular
way. Identify the pattern along the sequence; consider successive differences. Find the rule which
takes you aaoss the sequence - from n to Tn.
Figure 10.
in the Bridge Cables problem, illustrated in Figure 12 (see p. 68). Reconciling
the different forms (see Figure 13, p. 69) gives rise to a need for the development
of manipulation. Similar treatments are possible in the previous easier cases. For
exponential functions, see the examples provided in Figure 14 (see p. 70).
In Warmsnug Double Glazing (see Figure 15, p. 71), just as in the previous
examples, a function has to be found from a set of data (from The Language of
Functions and Graphs, Swan, 1985).
CONCLUSION
I have illustrated and discussed tasks oriented toward fostering the broad aims of
school algebra and at several points I have indicated how particular aspects of
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
27/33
SEQUENCES I
LI ST OF FORMULAE
I . t (n) = 7n - 3 a. t(n) = 3. 7 - 0. 4n
2. t( _n)= 3nZ 9. t(n) f 2 + 3
3. t(n) = 10 x 2 10. t(n) = 4n
4. t(n) = 6 - 2n
li. t(n] =
n - Sn' + 17
c
3.
t(n) f 6
12. t(n) = (2 x n) + 6
6. t(n) = (n + 2](n - 1)
13. t(n) = n
+4n-6
7. t(n) = n 2 - 4n 14. t(n) = 327n - 3
.
Generate the sequences corresponding to each of these formulae. Find their difference patterns.
Relate the type of sequence - its way of growing - to the type of formula. Sketch and compare the
graphs. (Use graphic calculator
if available . Then try to reverse
process. Get the form of the
formula from the previous experimentation. Adjust the coefficients by putting in some values of n.
s, 2. 4. 6. 3, 10
SV. 3. 6. 12, 24, 48
sz 1, Ai, 9, 16, 2s
sir 4.
a,
14, 22. 32
S, 4, 7, 10. 13, 16
su 10, 3. 5. 4, 2
S. 4, 12. 20, 23, 36 517 1, 3, 6, 10, 15
Ss 6, 24, 54. 36. i3
jl8 25. 28 33
38. 43
Sr 2. 4, 3. 16. 32
SU 6,
a.
14. 26, 50
ST 1, 4, a, 4, 4
SlD 16. 13. 7, 4.
Sr 6. 16. 30. 48. 70
51 3. S.2, 7.4, 9.5. il.3
S*
3. 6. 9. 12. is
srr a, 1, 5, 5. 3
510 95. 39. 33. 77, il
Szr 4, 16. 37, 76. i39
511 1. 9, 2s. 49. 31
s:* 2. 3. l-8. 31. ZI
SIZ
2, 20. 38, 56. i4 Szs 57 4 39 7 122. 154.3, 166.6
SIP 3, 5, 9. TS. 23
Figure 11.
67
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
28/33
Suspension bridge ablu
When maldng a able for a suspensionbridge,
many s s are assembled nto a hexagonal
formationand then compacted together.
This
diagram illustrates size 9 able
made up of 61 strands.
How many strandsare needed for a size 10 cable?
How many for a site n cable?
Figure 12
68
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
29/33
PURPOSE IN SCHOOL ALGEBRA
1. Developing a sequence.
69
.
2 Looking for structure.
-1
1
n n-l
3n(n-I)+1
nCZ(n- l)Z+(n- 1)
There are many other ways of seeing the diagram.
For example, can you see how you can get
notation and of algebraic manipulation might be dealt with, by focused and
generally self-checking activities, in such a context. I have not addressed the
question of building up fluency, either with particular manipulative processes or
in the deployment of the three major strategies. I consider it to be important and
see it as a regular result of focused activities devoted to particular algebraic laws.
But the question of how to facilitate the development of fluency, from trying out
possible manipulative laws, including self-checking using numbers, to the auto-
matic symbol-moving procedures used by experts without loss of the link with
understanding, demands further research.
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
30/33
T T T
c G G c G cs c7 G
Note CJ
Cl c* =, =, c, c,
c, c,
Frequency
(HJ Z7 664
130.6 261.6 523.2
10464 2092.6 4185-6
(a&w=)
--
Row number
1 2 3 4
5
--
Numkrr of squares
46 24 12 6 3
--
--
X 1 2
3 4 5
--
Y 4 16
64- 256 1024
--
--
a 1 2
3 4 5
--
b 2 6
32 126 512
--
InternatIonal
aper Sizes
A
Area (I+)
Lengh (mm)
WidM (mm)
A0 1
1169
&l
A, 05
641
594
2 0.25125
42094
42097
A, 0062
297
210
A, 0031
210
148
A* O-016
146
105
AT O-006
105
74
A, 0004
74
52
A, o-002 52 37
A,, 0.001
37
26
Consider the relationship between fhe paper size number (n) and its area
figure 14.
70
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
31/33
WARMSNUG DOUBLE GLAZING
(The windows on this sheet are all
drawn to scale: 1 cm represents 1 foot).
How have Warmsnug arrived at
the prices shown on these windows?
*
Which window has been given
an incorrect price? How much
should it cost?
*
Explain your reasoning clearly.
D
Figure 15.
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
32/33
72
BELL
REFERENCES
Bell, A.W. (1976). The learning of general mathematical strategies. Nottingham, England: Shell
Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham.
Bell, A.W. (1993a). Principles for the design of teaching. Educational Srudies in Mathematics, 24,
5-34.
Bell, A.W. (1993b). Some experiments in diagnostic teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
24, 115-137.
Bell, A.W., Fischbein, E., Greer, B. (1984). Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems:
The effects of number size, problem structure and context. Educational Studies in Mathemat-
ics, 15, 129-147.
Bell, A.W., Greer, B., Grimison, L., & Mangan, C. (1989). Childrens performance on multiplica-
tive word problems: Elements of a descriptive theory. Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education. 20, 434-449.
Bell, A.W., Low, B.C. (1982). Additive problems in everyday situations. Nottingham, England:
Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham.
Bell, A.W., Onslow, B. (1987). Multiplicative structures: Development of the understanding of
rates/intensive quantities. In J.C. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, & C. Kieran (Eds.),
Proceedings
of Eleventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
(Vol. 2,
pp. 275-281). Montreal, Canada: University of Montreal.
Bell, A.W., Onslow, B., Pratt, K., Purdy, D., Swan, M.B. (1985).
Diagnostic teaching: Teaching
for long term learning (Report of ESRC Project X491/ 1). Nottingham, England: Shell Centre
for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham.
Brown, M. (1981). Number operations. In K. Hart (Ed.),
Childrens understanding of mathematics:
11-16
(pp. 102-119). London: John Murray.
Clement, J. (1982). Algebra word problem solutions: Thought processes underlying a common
misconception. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 16-30.
Collis, K.F. (1975). Concreteformal operafions in school mathematics. Hawthorn, Victoria: Austra-
lian Council for Educational Research.
Filloy, E., Rojano, T. (1985). Obstructions to the acquisition of elemental algebraic concepts and
teaching strategies. In L. Streefland (Ed.),
Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference
for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 154-158). Utrecht, The Nether-
lands: State University of Utrecht.
Firth, D.E. (1975). A study of rule dependence in elementary algebra. Unpublished masters thesis,
University of Nottingham, England.
Foxman, D.D., Martini, R.M., Tuson, J.A., & Cresswell, M.J. (1980-1982).
APU mathematical
development secondary survey report no. I, 2, 3. London: HMSO.
Galvin, W., & Bell, A.W. (1977).
Aspects of dt iculties in the solution of problems involving the
formulation of equations. Nottingham, England: Shell Centre for Mathematical Education,
University of Nottingham.
Kieran, C. (198 1). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathemat-
ics, 12, 317-326.
Kieran, C. (1990). Cognitive processes involved in learning school algebra. In P. Nesher &
J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kiichemann, D. (1981). Algebra. In K.M. Hart (Ed.),
Childrens understanding of mathematics: ll-
16 (pp. 102- 119). London: John Murray.
Lee, L., & Wheeler, D. (1987).
Algebraic thinking in high school students: Their conceptions of
generalisation and justification
(Research Report). Montreal: Concordia University, Depart-
ment of Mathematics.
MacGregor, M.E. (1990). Writing in natural language helps students construct algebraic equations.
Mathematics Education Research Journal, 2 (2), l- 11.
-
8/10/2019 Purposes of School Algebra
33/33
PURPOSE IN SCHOOL ALGEBRA
73
MacGregor, M.E. (199 1).
Making sense of algebra: Cognitive processes influencing comprehension.
Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.
Mevarech, Z.R., Yitschak, D. (1983). Students misconceptions of the equivalence relationship.
In R. Hershkowitz (Ed.),
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference for the Psy-
chology of Mathematics Education
(pp. 313-3 18). Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of
Science.
Sutherland, R. (1992).
Thinking algebraically: Pupil models developed in LOGO and a spreadsheet
environment.
London, England: Institute of Education.
Swan, M.B. (1985). The language offunctions and graphs. Nottingham, England: Shell Centre for
Mathematical Education/Joint Matriculation Board.
Treilihs, V., Burkhardt, H., & Low, B.C. (1980). Formulationrocesses in mathematical modelling.
Nottingham, England: Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham.
Wollman, W. (1983). Determining the sources of error in a translation from sentence to equation.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 169- 18 1.