pruning and training sweet cherriessweet...
TRANSCRIPT
Pruning and Training Sweet CherriesSweet Cherries
Lynn E. Long Oregon State University Extensiong y
The Dalles Production TrendsThe Dalles Production Trends
• Largest productionLargest production area
• 10 000 A• ~ 10,000 A• 200 A – 1500 A
Oregon Production Trends
• Oregon– 80% of dwarfing
t t k ld i trootstocks sold into Oregon
– Gisela 6 and 12Gisela 6 and 12– Krymsk 5 (K6)
• OCG purchased 50 000 i 200650,000 since 2006
• Premium $3.50 vs $1.00
Labor IssuesLabor Issues
Worker Prod cti it• Worker Productivity• Worker Satisfaction
W k S f t• Worker Safety• Ability to Attract Labor
M R dilMore Readily
100 lbs/hr171 lbs/hr
Pedestrian OrchardsPedestrian Orchards
• Concerned aboutConcerned about labor
• Pedestrian orchards– Easier maintenance– Harvest time is halved– Need fewer pickers
Standard density = 15’x18’ Mazzard High density = 10’x16’ Gisela
Comparing the Economic and Cash Costs to Establish a Standard and High Density Sweet Cherry Orchard
in Wasco County, Oregon.
$2,000$6,000
$10,000 Economic Costs, StandardDensityCash Flow, Standard Density
-$10,000-$6,000-$2,000
Cas ow, Sta da d e s ty
Economic Costs, High Density
-$18,000-$14,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Cash Flow, High Density
Cash Flow = planting costs, Economic Costs = interest costs, labor, fertilizer, chemicals, harvest costs
depreciation, return on investments
C. Seavert
Future Labor ShortagesFuture Labor Shortages
• We will lack trainedWe will lack trained laborers.
• We now have complicated systems
• Impossible to preplicate
• Dr. Matthew Whiting– “We need to take the
art out of pruning.”
Choosing the right systemChoosing the right system
• As important asAs important as choosing– Variety– Rootstock
Three SystemsThree Systems
Training System PublicationTraining System Publication
• Steep LeaderSteep Leader• Vogel Spindle• Spanish BushSpanish Bush• $5.00 + postage
Spanish BushSpanish Bush
• Developed in EbroDeveloped in Ebro Valley of Spain
• Dwarfing rootstocks grecommended for fertile soils
• Non-dwarfing used in Spain, Australia
Spanish Bush AttributesSpanish Bush Attributes• Divert vigorDivert vigor
throughout multiple branches
• Maximum height 8 ft
Early TrainingEarly Training
• Branching formedBranching formed through heading cuts
• Non-precociousp
Spanish BushSpanish Bush
• Laterals are bearingLaterals are bearing wood
• Leaders are permanent
KGB ModificationKGB Modification
• No permanentNo permanent branches
KGB ModificationKGB Modification
• Similar throughSimilar through formation
KGB ModificationKGB Modification
• 2-4 largest leaders2 4 largest leaders stubbed back each year (dormant)
• New growth headed (dormant)
• Laterals removed (after harvest)
KGB ModificationKGB Modification
• 2-4 largest leaders2 4 largest leaders stubbed back each year (dormant)
• New growth headed (dormant)
• Laterals removed (after harvest)
Vogel Central Leader (S i dl )(Spindle)
• Developed inDeveloped in Franconia, Germany
• 8-10 ft x 16-18 ft • Works best with
dwarfing rootstocksg• Maximum height 10-
12 ft
Early TrainingEarly Training
• Expensive to trainExpensive to train
Precocious SystemPrecocious System
• Highly precociousHighly precocious– Horizontal angles– Little pruning in p g
establishment
3rd leaf Regina
Mature TreeMature Tree
• At maturity easy andAt maturity easy and fast to prune
• Don’t allow upper ppbranches to dominate
• Stub back branches• Tip all new growth
Upright Fruiting OffshootsUpright Fruiting Offshoots
• Developed by DrDeveloped by Dr. Matthew Whiting
UFOUFO
• Very PrecociousVery Precocious• Very Simple
UFOUFO
• Upright branchesUpright branches placed by bud removal orremoval or scoring
• 8” 12” spacing• 8 -12 spacing
UFOUFO
• 20% of branches20% of branches rotated out each yearyear
UFOUFO
• Pruning principlesPruning principles taught in minutes.
Principles of PruningPrinciples of Pruning
• Common to any systemCommon to any system on productive rootstocks
• KGB, Vogel Spindle, UFO• Gisela, Krymsk, MaxMa 14,
etc.• Maximize fruit size
Step 1Step 1
• Remove pendant andRemove pendant and small wood
• Bad on Mazzard• Disaster on Gisela• No new growthNo new growth• Not enough leaves to
support cropsuppo t c op
Step 2Step 2
• Dormant seasonDormant season• Remove ⅓ to ½ of
last years growthy g• Tip all branches• Reduces future cropReduces future crop
Step 2Step 2
• Dormant seasonDormant season• Remove ⅓ to ½ of
last years growthy g• Tip all branches• Reduces future cropReduces future crop
Tipping ResponseTipping Response
Unpruned
Year 1 – vegetative growth
Bing/G5g g
Year 2 – vegetative growth
Year 3 – vegetative & fruit growth
Assumptions:
7 lvs/spur6 f it/
g g6 fruit/spur2’ cm annual growth1 node per 1 inch5 leaves/fruit neces
Matthew Whiting, 5 leaves/fruit neces.
Year 3 Leaf:Fruit
WSU
f
Year 4 Leaf:Fruit
2.5 leaves/fruit
1.8 leaves/fruit
Pruned 1 yearAssumptions:
Bing/Gisela 5
7 lvs/spur6 fruit/spur60 cm annual growthg1 node per 2.5 cm5 leaves/fruit neces.
M. Whiting, WSU
Year 3 Leaf:Fruit
Year 4 Leaf:Fruit
4.7 leaves/fruit
Year 4 Leaf:Fruit
2.1 leaves/fruit• Manage crop load in year 1 (shoots)
Pruned 2 years
Year 3 Leaf:Fruit
Bing/Gisela 5
Year 3 Leaf:Fruit
Y 4 L f F i
4.4 leaves/fruit
Year 4 Leaf:Fruit
3.5 leaves/fruit
M. Whiting, WSU
• Manage crop load in year 1
Step 3Step 3
• Renewal Pruning• Stub back 20% of all
f iti d hfruiting wood each yearLeave 5” 20” stubs• Leave 5”-20” stubs
• Reduces current seasons cropseasons crop
• Renews spurs
Step 4Step 4
• Dormant seasonDormant season• Thin shoots at top of
tree to single branchg• Make sure tree
shaped like pyramidp py• Allows light
penetration throughout tree